Ep. 74 - Precedential Decisions from 9/20/2021 - 9/26/2021 (nexus; Yemen; motion to reopen - changed country conditions, sua sponte, exceptional circumstances; NTA deficiencies; parole; accomplice & categorical approach; credibility)

Immigration Review

Immigration Review
Ep. 74 - Precedential Decisions from 9/20/2021 - 9/26/2021 (nexus; Yemen; motion to reopen - changed country conditions, sua sponte, exceptional circumstances; NTA deficiencies; parole; accomplice & categorical approach; credibility)
Sep 27, 2021

[2:49] Ghanem v. Att’y Gen. U.S., No. 19-1475 (3d Cir. Sept. 22, 2021)

  • asylum; political opinion; nexus; mixed-motive; tribal; ignoring evidence; corroboration; reasonable explanation; CAT; Matter of J-F-F-; hypotheticals; Houthi; Yemen

 

[9:09] Abushagif v. Garland, No. 19-60807 (5th Cir. Sept. 24, 2021)

  • motion to reopen; changed country conditions; affidavits; inherently believable; burdens; asylum; CAT; Libya

 

[14:01] Matter of Arambula-Bravo, 28 I&N Dec. 388 (BIA 2021)

  • NTA; jurisdiction; Niz-Chavez; Pereira; parole termination; charging document; 8 C.F.R. § 212.5(e)(2)(i); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.13; INA § 274(A)(1)(a)(ii); aggravated felony; INA § 101(a)(43)(N); alien smuggling

 

[20:10] Tino v. Garland, No. 20-3508 (8th Cir. Sept. 20, 2021)

  • Pereira; Niz-Chavez; jurisdiction; NTA; asylum; Guatemala; gangs

 

[22:29] Berdiev v. Garland, No. 20-9542 (10th Cir. Sept. 21, 2021)

  • sua sponte motion to reopen; equitable tolling; ineffective assistance of counsel; due diligence; Matter of  Zmijewska; ten-year bar for failure to voluntarily depart; Chenery

 

[29:55] Alfred v. Garland, No. 19-72903 (9th Cir. Sept. 22, 2021)

  • Valdivia-Flores; Washington robbery; categorical approach; accomplice; aiding and abetting

 

[36:27] Li v. Garland, No. 18-70943 (9th Cir. Sept. 21, 2021)

  • adverse credibility; omissions; inconsistencies; Iman v. Barr; totality; respondent confusion and sloppy testimony; misuse of pronouns; China; house church; misrepresentation in application 

 

[41:02] Cui v. Garland, No. 18-72030 (9th Cir. Sept. 23, 2021)

  • motion to reopen; in absentia; exceptional circumstances; appeal of in absentia removal order; immigration court mistakes; Matter of Guzman-Arguera




*Sponsors and friends of the podcast!

Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli and Pratt P.A.
www.kktplaw.com/
Immigration, serious injury, and business lawyers serving clients in Florida, California, and all over the world for over 40 years.

Docketwise
www.docketwise.com/immigration-review
"Modern immigration software & case management"


*Want to become a patron of Immigration Review? 

Check out our Patreon page at https://www.patreon.com/immigrationreview 


*CONTACT INFORMATION
Email: kgregg@kktplaw.com
Facebook: "Immigration Review Podcast" or @immigrationreview
Instagram: @immigrationreview
Twitter: @immreview



DISCLAIMER: 
Immigration Review® is a podcast made available for educational purposes only. It does not provide specific legal advice. Rather, the Immigration Review® podcast offers general information and insights regarding recent immigration cases from publicly available sources. By accessing and listening to the podcast, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the podcast host. The Immigration Review® podcast should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state. 

MUSIC CREDITS: 
"Loopster," "Bass Vibes," "Chill Wave," and "Funk Game Loop" Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com) Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 4.0 License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.

Support the show