

        <cite>Conor</cite>
      <time>0:00</time>
      <p>
          We   got   warblers,   we   got   cardinals,   we   got   golden   eagles   now.
      </p>

        <cite>Bryce</cite>
      <time>0:03</time>
      <p>
          I   do   love   birds   and   waterfowl,   so   yeah,   oh   my   goodness,   that&#39;s   correct.
      </p>

        <cite>Conor</cite>
      <time>0:08</time>
      <p>
          That&#39;s   correct.   Bright   oh   I   wasn&#39;t   even   thinking   about   that. Welcome   to   ADSP   the   podcast   episode   45,   recorded   on   September   11th,   2021.   My   name   is   Connor,   and   today   with   my   co-host   Bright,   we   revisit   inverse   scans,   talk   about   groups,   and   talk   a   little   bit   about   Combinator   Bird.   Maybe   that   that   should   be   an   episode   one   day.   Not   that   people   care,   maybe   not.   I   went   to   uh   three   national   science   fairs.
      </p>

        <cite>Bryce</cite>
      <time>0:43</time>
      <p>
          Yeah,   no,   that&#39;s   definitely   gonna   be   an   episode.   How   do   I   not   I   I   I   keep   learning   things   about   Connor.   And   you   know,   it&#39;s   I&#39;ve   learned   enough   surprising   things   about   Connor   that   I&#39;m   never   surprised   when   I   learn   some   new   savant   level   thing   that   Connor   has   done.
      </p>

        <cite>Conor</cite>
      <time>1:00</time>
      <p>
          It&#39;s   not   savant.   Although   I   will   say   this   the   start   of   the   story   was   that   I   had   no   intention   on   trying   to   get   to   the   national   level.   Um   I   just   one   year   I   I   asked   my   mom,   how   come   when   people   break   their   spinal   cords,   they   can&#39;t   like   fix   it?   Like   you   break   your   arm,   you   put   a   cast   on   it,   you&#39;re   good   to   go.   But   like   you   break   your   spinal   cord,   and   then   you&#39;re   in   a   wheelchair   for   the   rest   of   your   life,   either   as   a   paraplegic   or   quadriplegic.   And   uh   she   was   like,   Well,   why   don&#39;t   you   do   a   science   fair   project   on   it?   And   uh   fast   forward   like   a   couple   years   later,   I   had   finished   cutting   up   some   worms   and   like   testing   how   they   regenerated   their   cells   and   all   this   stuff,   and   I   was   just   this   like   happy   go-lucky.   I&#39;d   I   had   uh   finished   all   my   projects   in   a   woodworking   elective,   and   so   I   cut   out   like   a   sort   of   mini   life-size   human   and   then   plugged   in   a   bunch   of   Christmas   lights   to   like   different   parts   of   the   body,   and   very,   very   unsafely   had   this   mechanism   where   I   could   plug   and   unplug   these   little   things,   and   so   it   would   light   up   like   oh,   if   you   break   it   at   L4,   like   at   Lumber   4,   like   this   is   the   parts   that   you   lose   access   to.   It   was   super   awesome   and   definitely   against   all   the   regulations.   Uh   and   then   any   I   ended   up   I   ended   up   getting   one   of   the   top   awards,   which   inv   involved   a   uh   entrance   to   the   Canada   Wide   Science   Fair,   which   at   the   time   was   uh   that   year   being   held   in   uh   St.   John&#39;s,   Newfoundland   on   the   other   side   of   the   country.   Connor   Hookstra   in   grade   eight   had   never   stepped   foot   on   a   plane   before.   I   had   not   I   had   not   traveled   like   outside   of   the   province,   I   don&#39;t   think   in   my   lifetime.   Maybe   I   crossed   the   U.S.   border   once,   but   I&#39;d   never   flown,   um,   never   been   on   a   plane.   Well,   I   guess   those   are   the   same   thing,   but   you   never   know.   Uh   and   so   I   was   so   excited.   I   walked   down   the   whatever   the   stage,   uh,   the   auditorium   down   to   the   stage.   I   was   literally   like   shaking   and   jumping   up   and   down.   And   all   I   was   thinking   in   my   head,   like   so   like   literally,   all   the   other   winners,   they&#39;re   just   standing   there   with   their   like   trophy.   I   am   like   bouncing   up   and   down   on   the   stage   like   a   small   bunny   rabbit,   like   an   energizer   bunny.   And   in   my   head,   I&#39;m   thinking,   oh   my   god,   I   hope   my   parents   let   me   go.   Oh   my   god,   I   hope   my   parents   let   me   go.   Because   I   wasn&#39;t   sure   if   I   was   gonna   be   allowed   to   go.   Um,   but   it   was   all   expenses   paid,   and   yeah,   that   was   uh   that   was   a   good   time.
      </p>

        <cite>Bryce</cite>
      <time>3:22</time>
      <p>
          They   they   they   fly   your   parents   out   too,   I   assume.
      </p>

        <cite>Conor</cite>
      <time>3:25</time>
      <p>
          No,   no,   no.   You   uh   you   go   with   the   chaperone.   Um   and   yeah,   Chris   Gasky   uh   he   he   did   his   on   uh   genetics   uh   project   on   genetics   at   the   time,   and   so   yeah,   we   became   good   friends.   Um   and   I   was   supposed   to   go   travel   around   with   him   in   Europe.   He   was   doing   his   uh   MBA   in   in   the   Netherlands   in   the   past   year.   And   then   good   old   COVID.   Good   old   COVID.
      </p>

        <cite>Bryce</cite>
      <time>3:45</time>
      <p>
          He   was   doing   an   MBA   in   the   Netherlands.
      </p>

        <cite>Conor</cite>
      <time>3:48</time>
      <p>
          Yeah,   yeah.   He   is   uh   it   would   have   been   awesome   to   go   and   travel   around,   but   um   well,   so   we   we   ended   up   talking   a   little   bit   about   uh   the   associative   operation   back   in   episode   43,   then   episode   44,   completely   unplanned.   We   just   ended   up   opining.   Uh   we   might   have   to   do   another   episode.   I   think   the   the   moral   is   if   you&#39;re   in   school,   probably   the   answer   for   most   of   you   is   to   stay   in   school.   Should   you   go   to   school?   Stay   tuned   for   a   future   episode,   which   I   guess   at   that   point   will   be   planned.   Um   I   was   gonna   bring   up   one   last   thing,   which   maybe   I   should   cut   into   the   first   one   because   it&#39;s   math   related.   So   we   we   um   in   episode   42,   had   you   had   mentioned   there&#39;s   probably   a   name   for   the   mathematical   property   of   the   difference   between   the   plus   and   the   max   scan.   Um,   and   then   we   put   it   to   our   listeners.   So   one   of   our   listeners   responded   via   tweet.   Um,   his   name   or   their   name,   I   should   say,   uh   is   Andre   Andreas   Shotti.   I   apologize.   We   gotta   we   gotta   do   take   a   course   on   how   to   like   pronounce   names.
      </p>

        <cite>Bryce</cite>
      <time>4:52</time>
      <p>
          I   don&#39;t   I   don&#39;t   think   that   would   help   us.   I   don&#39;t   think   that   I   think   it   would.   I&#39;m   gonna   uh   whatever   affliction   we   have   when   it   comes   to   pronunciation,   I   don&#39;t   think   it&#39;s   curable.
      </p>

        <cite>Conor</cite>
      <time>5:01</time>
      <p>
          Uh   at   me   on   on   Twitter   or   or   GitHub   if   there&#39;s   a   course   I   can   take.   But   um   they   wrote   uh   I   believe   the   concept   you&#39;re   searching   uh   was   inverse   functions.   A   function   is   invertible   if   it   is   a   bijection.   Uh   in   the   case   of   scans,   don&#39;t   consider   the   binary   operation,   but   instead   consider   the   partially   applied   unary   function.   So   for   example,   if   you   have   42   plus   x   or   the   max   of   42x,   addition   is   obviously   bijective,   but   max   isn&#39;t   because   in   this   example   all   values   of   x   that   are   less   than   or   equal   to   42   are   mapped   to   42,   whereas   for   plus   it&#39;s   not   the   case.   So   like   it&#39;s   a   one-to-one   mapping   for   a   unary   function.   So   like   basically   you   can   think   of   uh   max   as   like   it   sucks   in,   it   maps   a   bunch   of   different   values,   one,   two,   three,   four,   five,   six,   seven,   all   the   way   to   42   into   42.   And   so   because   of   that,   you   can&#39;t   get   back   those   values.   But   for   a   function   like   42   plus   x,   whenever   you   have   a   different   value   of   x,   it&#39;s   always   gonna   produce   a   different   answer.
      </p>

        <cite>Bryce</cite>
      <time>6:00</time>
      <p>
          Yeah.
      </p>

        <cite>Conor</cite>
      <time>6:01</time>
      <p>
          I&#39;m   not   sure   if   bijection   is   actually   what   we&#39;re   looking   for.   Um   so   I   guess   they&#39;re   saying   it&#39;s   inverse   functions.   That   being   said,   um,   we   also   got   a   response   on   GitHub,   and   this   is   from   uh   Roman.
      </p>

        <cite>Bryce</cite>
      <time>6:13</time>
      <p>
          Wait,   explain   explain   explain   how   we   got   an   ex   a   response   on   GitHub.
      </p>

        <cite>Conor</cite>
      <time>6:18</time>
      <p>
          Because   I   said   if   um   if   you   don&#39;t   have   Twitter,   uh   just   go   find   uh   our   so   I   have   um   our   website   is   hopes   hosted   using   uh   Ruby   Jekyll   pages,   blogs,   and   so   it&#39;s   it&#39;s   just   backed   by   like   a   GitHub   repo.   And   so   he   just   opened   an   issue.   Or   they   open   an   issue,   sorry.
      </p>

        <cite>Bryce</cite>
      <time>6:35</time>
      <p>
          Uh   I   love   it.   If   you   have   it   if   you   have   any   complaints   about   our   podcast,   just   uh   open   an   issue   or   send   us   a   PR.
      </p>

        <cite>Conor</cite>
      <time>6:44</time>
      <p>
          I&#39;ve   decided   that   once   every   50   episodes,   which   we&#39;re   coming   up   on   now,   um,   we   will   like   quasi-reintroduce   ourselves   and   we&#39;ll   plug   all   our   contact   stuff.   Because   I   don&#39;t   really   like   plugging,   like,   oh,   you   know,   follow   us   here,   blah,   blah,   blah.   If   people   like   it,   they&#39;ll   do   whatever.
      </p>

        <cite>Bryce</cite>
      <time>6:59</time>
      <p>
          No,   no,   come   on.   Shouldn&#39;t   we   shouldn&#39;t   we   tell   all   the   people   to   go   leave   us   reviews   on   the   iTunes   storm?
      </p>

        <cite>Conor</cite>
      <time>7:06</time>
      <p>
          No,   so   I   just   said   we&#39;re   doing   that   once   every   50   episodes. I   hate   that&#39;s   the   thing.   I   I   I   sort   of   irks   me   when   I   l   I   listen   to   30   plus   podcasts,   and   they&#39;re   always   saying,   you   know,   um,   go   live   go   leave   a   five-star   review   on   iTunes.   And   I&#39;m   like,   well,   wait,   what   if   I   what   if   I   don&#39;t   like   your   podcast   enough   to   give   a   five-star   review?   And   they&#39;re   like,   they   don&#39;t   ask.   They   don&#39;t   ask   for   well,   some   of   them   ask   for   a   review,   but   most   of   them   implore   you   to   go   give   a   five-star   review.
      </p>

        <cite>Bryce</cite>
      <time>7:32</time>
      <p>
          See,   see,   my   the   podcasts   I   listen   to   are   better   than   the   podcasts   you   listen   to,   because   the   podcasts   I   listen   to   never   implore   you   to   leave   a   five-star   review.   They   just   say,   please   leave   a   review.
      </p>

        <cite>Conor</cite>
      <time>7:41</time>
      <p>
          Yeah,   yeah.   That&#39;s   and   that&#39;s   the   thing.   I   would   never   ask   for   five   star.   I   would   say   leave   the   review   that   you   think   is   appropriate.   I   mean,   if   you   don&#39;t   like   our   content,   feel   I   mean,   you   do   what   you   want.   Don&#39;t   leave   a   review,   leave   a   one-star   review.
      </p>

        <cite>Bryce</cite>
      <time>7:53</time>
      <p>
          Um,   you   know,   don&#39;t   leave   a   one-star   review   on   this   podcast.   I   will   find   you.
      </p>

        <cite>Conor</cite>
      <time>8:01</time>
      <p>
          I   see.   That&#39;s   the   thing   is   I   don&#39;t   know   what   the   list   typical   listener   looks   like   or   what   their   behavior   is   like,   but   I   feel   like   if   now   we&#39;re   gonna   get   a   bunch   of   one-star   reviews,   just   I&#39;m   gonna   have   to   check   out.
      </p>

        <cite>Bryce</cite>
      <time>8:12</time>
      <p>
          Do   we   do   we   have   do   we   have   reviews   on   iTunes?
      </p>

        <cite>Conor</cite>
      <time>8:17</time>
      <p>
          I   have   no   idea.   I   don&#39;t   I   don&#39;t   honestly   I   honestly   I   the   my   my   value   from   recording   this   is   just   getting   a   chat   with   you   once   every   once   every   couple   weeks.   And   then   every   once   in   a   while   we   have   people   retweet   or   whatever,   tweet   at   us   on   Twitter.
      </p>

        <cite>Bryce</cite>
      <time>8:31</time>
      <p>
          I   can&#39;t   I   but   now   I   have   to   know.   Now   I   have   to   know.   Okay,   I   I   don&#39;t   I   I   own   no   I   own   no   things   from   the   Apple   Corporation.   Uh   so   I   I   have   no   idea   how   to   access   the   iTunes   store,   but   somebody   please   tell   me   if   we   have   reviews,   especially   if   they&#39;re   like   really   bad   reviews   that   like   just   like   trash   us.   Like,   I   want   to   know.   I   wanna   know.
      </p>

        <cite>Conor</cite>
      <time>8:57</time>
      <p>
          Oh   man,   if   you   want   if   you   want   bad   reviews,   we   can   just   go   look   at   one   of   my   uh   YouTube   videos.   Uh   the   ones   where   I   do   like   the   comparative   languages.   Oh   man,   it&#39;s   uh   I   get   a   lot   of   hate   these   days.   It&#39;s   just   like,   you   know,   yeah.   We&#39;ll   save   it   for   another   episode.   But   yes,   we   we   did   get   an   issue   opened   uh   by   Roman   Roman   Koshetson.   Koshitson.
      </p>

        <cite>Bryce</cite>
      <time>9:21</time>
      <p>
          Uh   well,   you   know,   we   we   should   tell   people,   you   know,   if   you   have   if   you   have   a   um   if   you   have   you   know   if   you   find   some   issue   or   you   have   some   feedback   or   something,   like   you   can   open   an   issue,   but   you   could   also   like   send   us   a   PR   with   an   audio   clip   of   you   asking   the   question,   something   like   that,   and   then   we   can   use   it   in   the   episode.
      </p>

        <cite>Conor</cite>
      <time>9:44</time>
      <p>
          Can   they   do   that   on   a   GitHub   issue?
      </p>

        <cite>Bryce</cite>
      <time>9:47</time>
      <p>
          Um,   see   I&#39;m   I   kind   of   I   don&#39;t   I&#39;m   gonna   remind   you   of   the   relationship   here.   I&#39;m   the   executive   producer,   I   come   up   with   the   big   ideas,   you   implement   them.
      </p>

        <cite>Conor</cite>
      <time>10:01</time>
      <p>
          So   the   problem   is   that   we   deck   we   technically   do   have   an   email,   but   I   already   have   six   personal   emails.   I   do   not   have   the   bandwidth   to   keep   track   of   another   email.
      </p>

        <cite>Bryce</cite>
      <time>10:11</time>
      <p>
          Just   have   it   forward   to   your   uh   Gmail.   That&#39;s   what   I   do.
      </p>

        <cite>Conor</cite>
      <time>10:15</time>
      <p>
          That&#39;s   a   lot   of   work.
      </p>

        <cite>Bryce</cite>
      <time>10:16</time>
      <p>
          I   don&#39;t   know,   it&#39;s   really   easy   to   set   up.   That&#39;s   what   I   do   for   yeah,   I&#39;ll   show   you   how   to   do   it.   Yeah.
      </p>

        <cite>Conor</cite>
      <time>10:20</time>
      <p>
          Well,   think   about   it.   Anyways,   we   gotta   read   this,   we   gotta   read   this,   and   I&#39;ve   realized   it   actually   was   not   the   issue   was   not   opened   by   Roman.   It   was   open   by   Sunbubble.   Uh,   and   then   Roman   just   posted   a   comment,   which   actually   I   didn&#39;t   even   see   because   it   was   posted   seven   hours   ago.   So   very   quickly,   uh   Sunbubble   says,   I&#39;m   pretty   sure   that   the   concept   you&#39;re   looking   for   is   group.   So   we&#39;ve   got   inverse   functions   and   we&#39;ve   got   group.   Uh   a   group   is   just   a   monoid   with   an   additional   inverse   operation   for   each   element   of   the   set.   My   understanding   is   that   the   inverse   left   scan   is   just   a   right   scan   with   the   inverse   binary   operation.   Actually,   wait,   my   understanding   is   that   the   inverse   left   scan   is   just   a   right   scan   with   the   inverse   binary   operation.   Is   that   true?   So   uh   uh   uh   a   plus   scan   is   the   left   scan,   and   an   inverse   of   that   they&#39;re   saying   is   a   right   scan   with   the   inverse,   which   would   be   minus.   So   that   would   be   that   would   be   correct.   Technically   Yeah,   technically   that   is   I   think   correct.   It&#39;s   correct   for   the   plus   scan,   like   a   plus   an   inverse   plus   scan   is   equivalent   to   a   minus   right   scan.   But   is   it   is   it   correct   for   all   the   other   ones?   Sunbubble,   Sunbubble   continues   to   say   keep   in   mind   that   both   monoids   and   groups   may   or   may   not   be   commutative   related   to   the   missing   reduction   episode   topic.   Also,   as   far   as   I   know,   monoid   or   maybe   strictly   a   semi-group   is   the   typical   base   property   you   need   to   be   able   to   implement   a   parallel   version   of   scans   and   folds.   And   then   Sunbubble   links   a   couple   resources.   And   then   Roman   replies,   I&#39;ve   just   listened   to   episode   42   and   found   this   repo   to   say   groups,   groups   are   everywhere,   but   Sunbubble   beat   me.   Let   me   elaborate   a   bit   more   on   this.   A   group   is   a   pair   of   an   operation   and   a   set.   This   means   that   existence   of   inverse   often   depends   not   only   on   the   operation   you   use,   but   also   on   the   type   of   elements   fed   into   this   operation.   That   makes   sense,   yeah.   Um,   and   then   I&#39;m   not   gonna   read   through   this,   but   uh   Ramon   proceeds   to   say,   let&#39;s   show   that,   and   then   uh   states   a   lemma   and   has   uh   a   bit   of   a   proof.
      </p>

        <cite>Bryce</cite>
      <time>12:25</time>
      <p>
          At   least   in   terms   of   C,   when   we&#39;re   talking   about   an   operation,   um   I   think   we   are   typically   talking   about   a   group   because   when   we&#39;re   talking   about   an   operation,   we&#39;re   not   talking   about   it.   You   know,   the   types   that   it   operates   on.   Like   when   we   sometimes   we   when   we   talk   about   you   know   we&#39;re   talking   about   usually   we&#39;re   talking   about   it.   And   so   then   when   we   talk   about   like   when   we   talk   about   the   sub-dos,   we&#39;re   we&#39;re   not   just   talking   about   sub-dos,   but   we&#39;re   also   talking   about   sub-dos   and   sequences   that   can   be   added   to   the   sub-duce.
      </p>

        <cite>Conor</cite>
      <time>13:25</time>
      <p>
          Yeah,   looks   like   I   gotta   go   after   finishing   this   category   theory   book.   I   gotta   go   read   a   set   theory   book.   I   feel   like   set   theory   is   actually   gonna   be   more   useful   than   category   theory.
      </p>

        <cite>Bryce</cite>
      <time>13:36</time>
      <p>
          If   I   find   them,   I   can   mail   you   some   of   my   some   of   my   math   books.
      </p>

        <cite>Conor</cite>
      <time>13:40</time>
      <p>
          Okay.   And   we   didn&#39;t   even   so   my   my   goal   was   to   talk   about   the   uh   inverse   functions   group   response   and   then   also   the   other   feedback   that   we   did.
      </p>

        <cite>Bryce</cite>
      <time>13:49</time>
      <p>
          And   you   know,   I&#39;m   I&#39;m   terrible   because   I   knew   that   we   I   knew   that   we   had   that   inverse   group   uh   uh   I   because   I   saw   it   on   Twitter,   I   knew   we   had   that,   I   knew   we   had   it   to   talk   about,   but   I   had   to   do   my   ranchy   spiel   thing.
      </p>

        <cite>Conor</cite>
      <time>14:01</time>
      <p>
          Well,   no,   so   I   was   gonna   I   was   gonna   say   that   was   gonna   be   the   first   episode,   and   then   the   second   one   was   gonna   be   delving   into   the   world   of   combinator   birds   because   I&#39;ve   just   been   going   on   a   combinator   tear   because   I&#39;m   reading   to   to   mock   a   mocking   bird,   and   like   it   used   to   just   be   about   the   starlings   and   the   phoenix   and   the   bluebirds,   but   now   we   got   bald   eagles,   golden   eagles,   we   got   them   all,   man.   And   uh   I&#39;m   catching   them   all,   and   it&#39;s   it&#39;s   it&#39;s   so   awesome,   and   it&#39;s   really   it&#39;s   gonna   be   the   future.   I   don&#39;t   understand   how   Haskell   Curry   spent,   you   know,   three   to   four   decades   um   studying   and   writing   his   texts   on   combinatory   logic,   and   then   it   just   seems   like   the   world&#39;s   forgotten   about   it.   Like   everybody   knows   about   Lambda   calculus,   but   what   happened   to   the   SKI   combinator   calculus?   That&#39;s   where   it&#39;s   at.   That&#39;s   where   it&#39;s   at,   man.   And   uh   Martin,   or   not   Martin,   uh   Raymond   Smollian,   he   wrote   the   book   with   the   birds.   It&#39;s   even   it&#39;s   more   fun.   Who   doesn&#39;t   want   to   learn   the   bird   names?   Who   doesn&#39;t   want   to   learn   the   bird   names,   Bryce?   I   I   put   it   to   the   listener.   Don&#39;t   you   want   to   learn   about   the   birds?   We   got   warblers,   we   got   cardinals,   we   got   golden   eagles   now.
      </p>

        <cite>Bryce</cite>
      <time>15:02</time>
      <p>
          I   do   love   birds   and   waterfowl,   so   yeah.
      </p>

        <cite>Conor</cite>
      <time>15:05</time>
      <p>
          Oh   my   goodness,   that&#39;s   correct.   That&#39;s   correct,   Bryce.   Oh,   I   wasn&#39;t   even   thinking   about   that. You&#39;re   I   took   a   sign   about   uh   when   I   was   in   Regina   uh   visiting   a   friend   uh   in   August   because   they   had   a   waterfowl   park,   and   I   thought,   Bryce,   this   is   Bryce   that&#39;s   actually   not   Bryce&#39;s   kind   of   city,   because   it&#39;s   really   no   offense   to   the   people   of   Regina.   Um   look,   I   I   will   Bryce   is   usually   the   one   offending   people   of   the   world,   but   um   I   will   take   a   turn.   Uh   Regina   is   uh   not   a   lot   going   on.   I   think   the   I   think   the   lake   in   the   middle   of   the   city,   like   they   made   that   lake.   Um   maybe   it   was   there,   but   I   I   feel   like   I   feel   like   they   made   it.   Um   but   they   added   a   little   waterfowl   park   next   to   it,   and   um   uh   you   can&#39;t   run   by   a   sign   that   says   waterfowl   park   uh   when   you&#39;ve   got   a   uh   a   podcast   with   Bryce   and   not   think   of   him.   Um   and   this   recording   has   completely   gone   off   the   rails   now.
      </p>

        <cite>Bryce</cite>
      <time>16:00</time>
      <p>
          Uh   I   guess   we&#39;re   gonna   have   to   do   it,   we&#39;re   gonna   have   to   do   a   waterfowl   episode.   A   waterfowl   instead.
      </p>

        <cite>Conor</cite>
      <time>16:06</time>
      <p>
          Maybe   that&#39;s   what   I&#39;ll   call   if   I   I   I&#39;ve   decided   at   some   point,   uh,   you   know,   spoiler   for   the   listeners,   that   I   will   come   out   of   retirement.
      </p>

        <cite>Bryce</cite>
      <time>16:15</time>
      <p>
          Spoiler   for   who?
      </p>

        <cite>Conor</cite>
      <time>16:18</time>
      <p>
          Spoiler   for   who?
      </p>

        <cite>Bryce</cite>
      <time>16:20</time>
      <p>
          You   said   spoiler   for   the   listeners,   but   there&#39;s   not   listeners   that&#39;s   listeners   for   the   listener.
      </p>

        <cite>Conor</cite>
      <time>16:26</time>
      <p>
          Thanks   for   listening,   listener.   We   really   need   to   get   back   in   the   swing   of   things.   This   is   uh   this   is   a   rough   ending.   This   is   a   rough   landing.
      </p>

        <cite>Bryce</cite>
      <time>16:39</time>
      <p>
          Yeah,   I&#39;ll   say. You   can   fix   it   in   post.
      </p>

        <cite>Conor</cite>
      <time>16:44</time>
      <p>
          All   right.
      </p>

        <cite>Bryce</cite>
      <time>16:45</time>
      <p>
          Well,   well,   yeah,   we   should   probably   call   it.   Well,   we&#39;ll   we&#39;ll   uh   wait,   what   was   the   spoiler   for   listener?   For   the   listener.
      </p>

        <cite>Conor</cite>
      <time>16:52</time>
      <p>
          Oh,   yeah,   that   I&#39;m   coming   out   of,   I   will   be   at   some   point   in   the   future,   I   will   come   out   of   my   speaking   retirement   uh   to   give   a   talk   on   waterfowl.
      </p>

        <cite>Bryce</cite>
      <time>17:00</time>
      <p>
          Okay,   good.
      </p>

        <cite>Conor</cite>
      <time>17:01</time>
      <p>
          And   maybe   that&#39;s   what   I&#39;ll   call   it.   I&#39;ll   call   it   um   maybe   I&#39;ll   call   it,   yeah,   Bryce&#39;s   birds   or   something.
      </p>

        <cite>Bryce</cite>
      <time>17:06</time>
      <p>
          Uh   I   don&#39;t   mind   that.   I   don&#39;t   mind   that   at   all.
      </p>

        <cite>Conor</cite>
      <time>17:11</time>
      <p>
          Do   you   do   you   have,   yeah,   maybe   uh   that&#39;s   an   amazing   idea.   That&#39;s   an   amazing   idea.
      </p>

        <cite>Bryce</cite>
      <time>17:18</time>
      <p>
          Well,   you   were   about   to   ask,   do   I   have   a   favorite   waterfowl?   I   was,   but   then   I   was   thinking   of   actually   I&#39;m   I&#39;m   not   sure   if   this   was   like   geese   are   like,   you   know,   geese   are   pretty   good,   but   they&#39;re   also   a   little   bit   terrifying.   Ducks   are   like,   ducks   are   pretty,   ducks   are   pretty   okay.
      </p>

        <cite>Conor</cite>
      <time>17:33</time>
      <p>
          I&#39;m   not   sure   if   there&#39;s   any   of   the   bird   names   that   correspond   to   ducks,   but   what   would   be   amazing   is   if   I   didn&#39;t   actually   give   the   talk   live   and   I   I   pre-recorded   it   as   like   a   a   mini   documentary   where   where   I&#39;m   explaining,   getting   all   excited   about   the   combinator   birds,   and   then   we   cut   to   like   a   little   a   little   tour,   a   little   tour   of   a   bird   sanction   sanctuary,   and   Bryce   just   like,   oh   look,   look,   it&#39;s   a   cardinal,   and   then   cut   cuts   to   the   a   cardinal   is   also   known   as   Flip   from   Haskell   and   uh   it&#39;s   the   C   combinator.   Uh   cardinals   are   useful   for   we   cut   back   to   Bryce.
      </p>

        <cite>Bryce</cite>
      <time>18:09</time>
      <p>
          Look,   it&#39;s   a   war   blur!   Perfect,   perfect.
      </p>

        <cite>Conor</cite>
      <time>18:12</time>
      <p>
          It   would   be   amazing.   Although   I&#39;m   not   sure   if   we   could   find   I   wonder   if   there   is   a   bird,   a   what   do   they   call   it?   Like   an   aviary   or   a   sanctuary   that   um   has   all   of   the   cards.   Yeah,   does   it   have   all   the   birds   though?   I   live   in   New   York.
      </p>

        <cite>Bryce</cite>
      <time>18:29</time>
      <p>
          New   York   has   everything.   So   yes,   I&#39;m   sure   it   does.
      </p>

        <cite>Conor</cite>
      <time>18:33</time>
      <p>
          Okay.   Well   wait,   some   of   them   aren&#39;t   real   though.   Phoenix?   That&#39;s   not   a   real   bird.
      </p>

        <cite>Bryce</cite>
      <time>18:41</time>
      <p>
          No,   that&#39;s   not   a   real   bird.
      </p>

        <cite>Conor</cite>
      <time>18:44</time>
      <p>
          Wait,   did   I   click   stop?   Oh   no,   I   didn&#39;t.   Okay,   good.   All   right,   I&#39;m   clicking   stop   now.
      </p>

        <cite>Bryce</cite>
      <time>18:50</time>
      <p>
          Yes.   Did   you   did   you   because   this   is   all   such   such   such   gold,   such   gold.   We&#39;ll   really   be   able   to   use   this.
      </p>

        <cite>Conor</cite>
      <time>18:57</time>
      <p>
          Thanks   for   listening.   We   hope   you   enjoyed   and   have   a   great   day.
      </p>