Challenging the Mainstream: Uncovering Alleged Fraud and Corruption in COVID-19 Reporting Practices

Are you ready to challenge the mainstream narrative? Join us as we sit down with Dr. Ealy, an expert who dares to question the integrity of some of the biggest institutions in healthcare. Listen in as he pulls back the curtain on alleged criminal data fraud and willful misconduct by the CDC, Health, and Human Services Department and National Vital Statistics System. We delve into how changes in COVID death certificate reporting practices may have contributed to an inflated death toll, shining a light on what may well be an egregious abuse of power.

Ever questioned the legitimacy of PCR tests? Dr. Ealy does too, raising crucial issues about the role of these tests in creating a possible inflation of COVID-19 cases. We discuss the grand jury petition he filed, which alleges massive fraud that seemingly paved the way for justifying lockdowns, 5G tower installations, and, tragically, the death of millions of Americans. We also introduce you to Gareth Care, a beacon of hope in independent healthcare advocacy services, in our pursuit of truth.

Finally, we get into the nitty-gritty of the legal battle that underpins this case. We navigate the intricate court system, exposing the corruption we've encountered along the way while highlighting our fight for justice. It's a journey that underscores the importance of persistence and determination in holding these powerful institutions accountable. Despite the challenges, we are reminded that we are a force to be reckoned with - the resolve of the people will prevail in the fight for freedom. Join us for this essential conversation and become a part of the movement.

graithcare.com
Graith Care Independent Patient Advocate medical advocacy, consultation, advice US and International

OH EDDIES WHISKEY BOURBON SAUCE
Oh Eddies Sweet Whiskey Bourbon Sauce is guaranteed to step up your next barbeque. Made in Minnesota

Buzzsprout - Let's get your podcast launched!
Start for FREE

Instacart - Groceries delivered in as little as 1 hour.
Free delivery on your first order over $35.

Disclaimer: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase, I may receive a commission at no extra cost to you.

Transcript

Dave: 0:10

Secretly recorded from deep inside the bowels of a decommissioned missile silo. We bring you the man, one single man, who wants to bring light to the darkness and dark to the lightness. Although he's not always right, he is always certain. So now, with security protocols in place, the protesters have been forced back behind the barricades and the blast doors are now sealed. Without further delay, let me introduce you to the host of the podcast, Mr Tim Hudner.

HuttCast: 0:45

Thank you, Sergeant in Arms. You can now take your post. The views and opinions expressed in this program are solely those of the individual and participants. These views and opinions expressed do not represent those of the host or the show. The opinions in this broadcast are not to replace your legal, medical or spiritual professionals. Welcome to Hudcast 12-3-20-23. We have back on the show Dr Ealy. He is going to give us some intel kung fu, hand grip, all this stuff about what's going on in his life and his legal decisions with this whole thing. So if you'll stand by in a second, we're going to put him on and we're going to hear what's going on. So for Hudcast, be right back.

HuttCast: 1:35

The current healthcare system is not meeting the needs of real people. People are demanding better, better care, better options and want results. So Gareth Care has launched and is advocating for those in the US and internationally, Since people are realizing the controlled system has not been there for them. If you want your own independent advocate that is not controlled by big corporations, call or text and enroll today to get your advocate for your needs, serving all ages, For any healthcare needs you might have you matter. Here's how you get started. For more information, visit wwwgarethcarecom, Call or text the questions to healthcare sucks and get an advocate with Gareth Care. Get an additional 10% discount on your first advocacy bundle. Remember, mention Hudcast and get that extra 10% off your first bundle of time. This is all brought to you from Gareth Care. Welcome to Hudcast. Today on the special episode, we've got Dr Ealy back. Thank you, Dr Ealy, for being on this show for very much and we've got some information that you just might have for some listeners. What do you got going?

Dr Ealy: 3:07

Well, we've had this fun thing going on for the last three years, tim, and thank you so much for having me, and thank you to all of your audience for their consideration on this. I've been working with Senator Dennis Lenticum and Senator Ken Thatcher, our attorney Steve Jonkis, and really some great Americans on our team John Bowdoin, keith Wilkins, albert Benavides, Brian O'Shea and so many more people, judge Paul Nally, kelly Mordecai. We've put together a grand jury petition and the grand jury petition is very simple. We are alleging criminal data fraud and willful misconduct by people within the CDC, specifically Robert Redfield and Rachelle Walensky. We are alleging the construction of a enterprise fraud, a RICO enterprise fraud construct by the Health and Human Services Department, specifically Alex Azar and Xavier Becerra, and, of course, complicit defrauding of the American people and willful misconduct by the National Vital Statistics System, which is headed by Brian Moyer.

Dr Ealy: 4:23

What we found on March 24, 2020 was that the CDC had changed how death certificates were going to be reported, but only for COVID. Now, you and everybody in your audience, I'm sure at this point, has heard that there were people who were hit by a bus or fell off a ladder or shot and died, and that somehow those people died of COVID, right, right, okay. Well, in each of those instances, that's clear fraud and what we found was the construct for how they put it together. On March 24, 2020, the CDC was supposed to go to the federal register and say, hey, we want to make these changes to death certificates for COVID. Have they done that and followed the law the Administrative Procedures Act, the Paperwork Reduction Act and the Information Quality Act? What would have happened is a oversight at the federal level by the Office of Management and Budget that would have shut that change down and said, no, you can't do that. It would have also opened a mandatory 30-day to 60-day public comment period where we could have stepped in and said, no, you can't do that. That's going to hyperinflate all of the death certificates for COVID and this is how they did it.

Dr Ealy: 5:46

We all know that the high-risk group, with people over 65 with multiple preexisting conditions. We all know that the CDC actually published that on March 9 on CNBC News that they knew that. So this is no revelation to anyone. The way we've always recorded death certificates has been whatever your oldest preexisting condition is, that's going to be the cause of death. So, example a person had hypertension for 10 years and then caught a cold and died. The cold isn't what the cause of death was, it's the hypertension Does that make sense.

Dr Ealy: 6:25

Yeah, yeah, yeah Right, it's pretty simple stuff. So what the CDC did knowing that the people who were going to be high-risk and died were going to be people who are already pretty sick is they said well, only for COVID and just for this time, for this disease process, what we're going to do is we're going to move those preexisting conditions to a different part of the death certificate where they're not counted, and what we're going to do is that's going to leave COVID as the cause of death in every instance. And then what you have is this egregious ridiculousness going on, with medical examiners and coroners all around the country where they get a dead body that comes in ie the person who gets hit by a bus or falls off a ladder and they do a PCR test on the dead body to get a false positive so that they can call that a COVID death. And so you have these slight of hands going on all over the country. And what it did was it really fraudulently inflated the death count for COVID by about 95%. So what we're talking about is the CDC, by February I think, of 2021, maybe it was no February of 2022, excuse me had said that there were 890,000 Americans had died of COVID right caused by COVID. Well, upon several partial audits that were done in Alameda County, california, santa Clara County, california and a couple other places in the country, they found, just on quick reviews of death certificates, that roughly 25% right off the top were clearly fraudulent, that there's no way that could have been COVID, and what we had was John Bodewin, who got actual death certificates. He has accessed over a million death certificates now in two states three states, excuse me and his analysis has shown and confirmed what we've been saying since 2020, that they massively inflated this death count and calling everything COVID. It's gotten so bad that he has proof of little girls seven years old that got the damn shots and within days died, and that they still called it a COVID death, but not a death because of the shot, and so the fraud is rampant for us when our analysis shows that, while the CDC was saying in February of 2022 that 890,000 Americans had died of COVID, the real number is closer to about 50,000. So what you're talking about is a massive criminal data fraud against the American people, the fronting of the American people, and what you're talking about subsequent to that, because they did the same thing with case counts.

Dr Ealy: 9:22

One of the things that was very unique in case counting was that the CDC adopted a document from a nonprofit organization. If you can believe this, they drafted a document in April of 2020 from a little known organization called the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists. Now, this organization has no governmental authority whatsoever, but they are heavily funded by the Bill and Linda Gates Foundation and Gavin and all the Maxi Beatrice groups. So what the CDC does is they supply them with subject matter experts and then they can draft the paper they want, and then they later bring it in and adopt it. Well, the methodology that the CDC went about this is illegal. The CDC broke again three federal laws to do this. They didn't report it to the federal register, they didn't launch federal oversight and they didn't open up mandatory public comment on this. And what their argument is is that it was an emergency and we had to do it. Well, if it's such an emergency, why are you outsourcing it to a nonprofit organization?

Dr Ealy: 10:32

So you stop for a second. You look at this document, you go. What did the document say? This document said that all you had to do was cough once and you could be diagnosed with as COVID. And that's great if you're a hospital, because now you can call everything COVID and get more money from Medicare, medicaid insurance billing, which is what the Health and Human Services Department had set up. This is where if you put somebody with COVID on a ventilator, you get more than if you put them on a ventilator and it's the flu. So this is clear insurance fraud, clear criminal data fraud and even worse, tim In this document. What it says is that a person every single time a person takes a new PCR test, it counts as a new case. So let me back up a little bit here for everybody. Do you remember when people had to get a negative test to go back to work? Yes, I do, okay, well, do you remember what people were doing when they got a false positive test?

HuttCast: 11:37

Staying at home for 10 days.

Dr Ealy: 11:39

Well, some people would, but a lot of people would go and get tested five or six times a day. They would go around to the different free testing centers and just try to find a negative test. They were just hunting for a negative test. So some people were getting 12 to 15 tests in a week. Every single time that that test tested positive that wasn't associated with that person, those were each counted fraudulently as new cases. Every single time a person got a positive test. So what you have is this massive fraud, this massive enterprise of fraud, and for all intents and purposes, it appears to accomplish two very important goals for them One, to justify lockdowns and what happened when we got locked down they put up all these 5G towers that are such a big problem now and number two, to pave the way for the EUA for these shots which we know have injured. According to VAERS and VSAFE, over 11 million Americans have reported injuries from these shots. That's a low estimate, but that's out of those two systems, and we know that at least 36,000 people have died off, and most within two days after the shot, following the administration of Pfizer and Moderna and Johnson Johnson's death batches.

Dr Ealy: 13:09

So what we see here is that we see something catastrophic going on. They used a manipulation of data. They used criminal data fraud to construct a system a financial system that people could be complicit and go along with the fraud. Hospitals and doctors could go along with the fraud and make money at being fraudulent and in doing so, exhibited willful misconduct, which will then remove the protections of the PREP Act in the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and will enable Americans to sue these companies and the government into oblivion. I mean, this is what it comes down to is we need to open up the floodgates on lawsuits for people whose lives and their families have been destroyed by this.

Dr Ealy: 14:04

I mean, we're talking, tim. We know that $4.5 trillion of US taxpayer money has been stolen in the process of this fraud. We can prove this. There is a 0% chance we're wrong about this. So what we've done is put together a petition, filed it in federal court. It's going to go to the Supreme Court. As soon as we get a ruling on where we are the stage we are right now the next step is going to be the Supreme Court, and what's really exciting about this for Americans is that this is the legal effort right now, and there's some great ones out there Brooke, jackson, warner, mended Hall are doing great to work. There's some other things we've heard of. We just heard that AG Paxton is going after Pfizer, which we're attempting to interface with that team and support him and his venture. But we're the furthest along right now and what we've learned is a lot.

HuttCast: 15:06

I got a question. There are two types of tests. People might not know this. There's the PCR, the NAAT test, and there's the antigen test. But if you were to get a PCR test, the difference is that the positive tests on an antigen test are reliable but, however, in general antigen tests they're less likely to detect a virus than a PCR. So if you've got two tests that are running, which one trumps and which hospital administered the one? Because you say there's people running around taking 10, 15 tests, and if they're all PCR tests and they're all positives but you really don't have an accurate test like an antigen test, which one's Trump?

Dr Ealy: 15:47

Well, that's a great question, because the way we used to do things, and have always done things, is we actually do two tests that can be diagnostic, especially as a medical professional when you're dealing with symptomatology. You see, when you first come in and somebody comes in to work with me, per se, they're exhibiting signs low grade fever, maybe clear discharge from the nose, body aches, things like that. These are all signs of viral infection and so you write there off the bat. You can actually create a presumptive diagnosis of viral infection. What's the virus and what's going on, who knows? So if you step up and you say, well, I want to get a definitive diagnosis, then you do testing. And what we would do in the past is we would do antigen testing plus antibody testing. So the antigen testing would tell us what the viral load in the bloodstream is and we would look for several different possibilities. The antibody tests would tell us where we are in the immune process. So if we are talking about, you know, ig, it basically breaks down to immunoglobulins and if we have a certain class of immunoglobulins and we don't have another class, that tells us we're early stage, we have both classes, we're in the middle stage, and then if we only have one class at the end, then we know that we're over this, and especially if the viral load markers are going down. So there is a definitive way to look at this.

Dr Ealy: 17:19

Pcr was never a part of this. Pcr was never a part of this because many people know and have seen the videos by the late Kerry Mullis, who, in my opinion, was murdered. You know you can't have a guy like that, the inventor of PCR, running around during the 2020 and 2021, especially with his abject disdain for Anthony Fauci. You can't have him running around. So what he made very, very clear and is that PCR is not supposed to be used diagnostically and the labs back this up. When you run a PCR test like if we run a PCR test for something relative to the prostate, for example it actually says on the report, when you get the PCR testing back, it actually tells you point blank that this cannot be used diagnostically. It just is. It's an added way of looking at something. You need additional testing to make it a definitive diagnostic test by itself. You can't do it, which was another red flag for us when they proposed doing that. We've never done that before and there's good reason we've never done that before and it comes down to cycle threshold.

Dr Ealy: 18:34

When you talk about cycle threshold with PCR testing, it's akin to making copies. So let's say a person does one cycle. What that means is one is going to become two. One thing you're looking at is going to be two. You're going to make a copy of it. You go to two cycles. Those two things are going to become four. You go to three cycles, those four things are going to become eight. You go to four cycles, those eight things are going to become 16. Does that make sense? So far it's kind of this rapid speed. It sounds exponential, yes, exponential, right.

Dr Ealy: 19:07

So you can imagine, by the time you get to 30 on 30 cycles, I mean you're talking about a lot of copies right there. What that means is you can pretty much find anything you want. That's why most people who look at PCR testing say you know, if you actually wanted to use it diagnostically, you'd have to keep the number of cycles, the number of times you copy what's in there. You'd have to keep that under 30 to be accurate, to have any kind of semblance of accuracy. But what the FDA did was they set that at 40. And many labs that we know, and especially in the relative to the men and women in service and the arm services they were being, their PCRs were set at 45 cycles.

Dr Ealy: 19:55

I mean you start getting into anything above 30, really anything at about above 28, you're talking about. It's impossible to tell what that is. It could be whatever you want to be. So that's how you get so many false positives. And if you have, if everybody who's testing and they're, of course, because they never tell you what the cycle threshold is that you tested positive at, they never tell you what the cycle threshold that they set at for for what constitutes a negative. You know what I'm saying, but can we foy it? We actually foy it, this information, and they wouldn't tell us what it was.

Dr Ealy: 20:27

So you get to a place with a PCR where it's just clear fraud on top of existing fraud. And that's what my team brings to the table. We can break down the timelines. What happened, connect the dots. It's very easy to connect. It's just. It comes down to the simplicity of they lied using data. They manipulated death certificates. They manipulated COVID case counts. They manipulated COVID hospitalizations. They highly incentivized doctors and hospitals to go along with it and then, if you didn't go along with it. They threatened you. The FDA would come in and threaten you and what it was was a clear methodology for constructing a criminal enterprise that resulted in a theft of $4.5 trillion of US taxpayer money at the very least, and also, from what our analysis is showing, you know, millions of injuries and we are one of the things about VAERS that we've learned and this comes from our VAERS expert, top VAERS analysts in the country, albert Pinovides.

Dr Ealy: 21:35

You know what you're left with is the CDC doesn't tell Americans everything by a long shot. The CDC is in charge of the VAERS system. When you make a report to VAERS, you'll get the initial report and so if the person, let's say, passed out and there is a VAERS report, right, you'll get that report that they passed out. The American people will get that report. But let's say, because the CDC does follow-ups on all reports for a year, so let's say, two weeks later the person dies, complications, maybe they had a heart attack, myocarditis, right, or maybe they had a stroke, blood clot or something that we're seeing all over the place. The CDC will get that information, but they do not update the American people on that report.

Dr Ealy: 22:24

So what that means is we have no idea of the 1.7 million reports in VAERS right now, which is significantly underreported. To begin with, we have no idea what's happened to people after their first report. We have no idea how many people have actually died since their first report, but the CDC does, and they don't release that information to the American people. So it is very safe to say that over 100,000 Americans have died in connection with these damn shots and it's very safe to say that I'm probably underestimating significantly. We have concerns. Our VAERS analyst expert, albert Benavides, says it's probably closer to about 1.5 million Americans who died in connection with these shots. Wow, wow, wow.

HuttCast: 23:26

There's a good spot for a break. We're 21 minutes into this. Let's come back with the legal side of this. You want to give us some heads up on that when we come back 100% Okay. We'll be right back with Dr Ealy. He is open in our eyes yet again, so stand by. We'll be right back.

Speaker 4: 23:45

This grill and season take your taste buds to the next level. The sauce that'll change your barbecue forever. Oh Eddie's Whiskey Bourbon Sauce is going to be at the Anoka County Fair. Oh Eddie's Whiskey Bourbon Sauce is all about that split second when the tender meat and delectable sauce touches your taste buds. Don't believe me. Chef Richard Cooper is bringing oh Eddie's Whiskey Bourbon Sauce to the Anoka County Fair so you can taste it and become a believer yourself. Oh Eddie's Whiskey Bourbon Sauce the sauce that's worth the wait.

HuttCast: 24:17

Back at you with Dr Ealy. We left in the last segment the medical part of this and what we're doing and what he's seeing Now. Doc, let's fast forward a bit here and let's talk legal. Now I understand you're not turning, or am I? So these are strictly opinions, but let's find out where you are in the mix. And how are we going to kung fu these guys into saying, okay, yeah, we made a problem, because you know, government does never tell you when they're wrong.

Dr Ealy: 24:46

Oh yeah, well, the criminal isn't going to prosecute themselves. I mean, come on, that's not right. I think that violates the criminal code.

HuttCast: 24:55

There's a code.

Dr Ealy: 24:56

There's a code. So the thing I like to get across to Americans right now is that the CDC, the NVSS, the Health and Human Services Department they didn't violate federal law. It's people within those organizations that violated federal law. We have to start talking about the White House and we have to start talking about the people, because people are doing these things and you know, I'm in the unique position of I work with people who are severely injured by the shots, so I have a level of experience over these years that a lot of people don't have on that side, and I'm very blessed to work with folks on this team who have a very strong legal background. They've done a great job of educating me on the grand jury system. So we decided that there's really one solution here Because they're not going to investigate themselves and because they're not going to, a criminal isn't going to prosecute themselves, we have to use the only peaceful means. We have to be able to launch an investigation, and that's the grand jury. The grand jury, first of all. There are grand juries in every county in the United States 3,143 different counties. There are grand juries at every state level and there are grand juries at the federal level In phase one of our grand jury initiative, senator Dennis Linton and myself filed a grand jury petition unprecedented in legal history, us legal history.

Dr Ealy: 26:26

We filed a grand jury petition 63 pages with all the facts and a thousand pages of substantive exhibits, evidence to the courts, with one simple prayer for relief your honor, get this before a grand jury. We had already went through, attempted to go through all US attorneys we had attempted to work directly with and the Department of Justice. We had already attempted to work directly through a specific US attorney by the name of Scott Asfog, and we were invoking a federal law 18 USC 3332. 18 USC 3332 says explicitly that any US attorney who is made aware of crimes and is requested to get information to a grand jury shall get that information to a grand jury. That word shall, in legal parlance, really says is that you don't have the discretion, mr Attorney, of deciding whether that information be seen, should be seen, by a grand jury. You have to bring it to a grand jury. It's for them to decide and for this reason we have three official branches, right, we have the executive branch, the legislative branch and the judicial branch.

Dr Ealy: 27:50

The grand jury system belongs to we, the people, and specifically to be able to investigate corruption and willful misconduct wherever it may exist in our government. That's the sword function of the grand jury. The grand jury, they say, has a shield and a sword function. That's the sword function. Grand juries are made up of people like you and me, and grand juries do not have any limitation to where they can go to investigate, to hold corruption to account. So they pose this beautiful solution for us whereby, once a grand jury is investigating, they get to determine their own jurisdiction, and it's very clear in our laws and in our case law at the Supreme Court level that they cannot be interfered with. It's actually a felony to interfere with a grand jury investigation. Once a grand jury is completed their investigation, they can form of presentment, which is going to tell the American people what they found. They can also produce indictments against individual people and they can also Tim return back and say, hey, we investigated this thoroughly, here's our report, but there was no crime committed. You see what I'm saying. So they really are the thing that our enemies don't want us to access, and that's why we've had so much obstruction of justice, because when we reached out to the US attorneys, I paid for it myself to do it and we got no responses from the US attorneys or the Department of Justice, so that's dereliction of duty.

Dr Ealy: 29:36

We then started working with Senator Dennis Lentencombe, senator Kim Thatcher, who authored on their official letterhead letters to Scott Asfog saying hey, we need this information to get to a grand jury and under 18 USC 3332, you're required to do so. Instead of going to a grand jury, he went to the Department of Justice. Department of Justice started interacting with the senators and basically told them go, pound sand, we're not doing it. So everybody's they don't want this in front of a grand jury. So we went to the courts and we said hey, this has never been done before, but we want to get this petition and this evidence to a grand jury and we want to be able to, upon subpoenaed by the grand jury, we want to be able to inform them of what we know so that we can aid their investigation. That's how it's supposed to work.

Dr Ealy: 30:28

The court is supposed to have but one consideration for a petition like this, and this court didn't know how to handle it or knew how to handle it, and decided to do it whatever way they wanted to do it. Judge Hernandez in the Ninth Circuit Court didn't do that. He had one thing to rule on and Tim. That's public interest. The only question he was supposed to ask of this petition is is there public interest on this topic? I think, when you're talking about $4.5 trillion of US taxpayer money stolen, I think, when you're talking about over 11 million injuries by an experimental product, I think when you're talking about the incredible disruption to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness that has occurred over the last, there's public interest. We actually have a petition with Stand for Health Freedom, with over 300,000 signatures from Americans in support of this. There is significant public interest on this topic. We want to see an investigation.

Dr Ealy: 31:30

We sent in motion. We knew this was going to ultimately get to the Supreme Court and we sent in motion saying, hey, we don't expect to win at the lower levels. We do win, great, but whoever loses is going to appeal. It's just the way it is. This is going to get all the way to the top. We started that process and we are at the middle stage of it right now. We're at the appeals process because the Department of Justice actually started defending the people that we are alleging of crimes instead of investigating them.

Dr Ealy: 32:06

What we came in contact with was a judge who intentionally misinterpreted our petition. There's a little thing that Americans do not have the right to demand prosecution of an individual. It's called it said you have no traditionally cognizant interest in prosecution as an American, which is ridiculous, but that's the way it is. What Americans do have is a right to demand investigation. We were explicit in our initial petition to the Ninth Circuit Court that we are not requesting prosecution. We are requesting and demanding, as a prayer for relief, investigation. When you set that up, there's now no room for the judge to do anything other than to get this information to a grand jury. This judge ruled. Judge Hernandez ruled that we were attempting prosecution, even though we were explicit that we were not. He ruled against us.

Dr Ealy: 33:14

This is that whole standing issue where they keep saying you have no standing, you have no standing and we're seeing great cases getting thrown out of court. We knew that could happen, so we appealed and now we're at that stage. We had oral arguments set up for December 5th. Attorney Steve Jocus was going to be representing the team. We were going to have 15 minutes to answer questions to the appellate courts. It was actually going to be our first moment in court on this issue. We have been trying to get into oral arguments for some time and we had it scheduled December 5th it was going to happen. And then the day after Thanksgiving, when nobody is really doing anything, this year Thanksgiving, this year, okay, the Circuit Court sent our attorney a letter late in the afternoon, almost to close a business, saying, hey, we actually have enough information, we don't need you guys to come in. They revoked our right to oral arguments. We said, fine, we probably won't get a ruling in our favor. We might, but we probably won't. It doesn't matter, because that's going to go to the Supreme Court.

Dr Ealy: 34:27

Our phase one, which is the federal level grant jury system, is actually going to go to the Supreme Court. It may take. The Supreme Court may pick it up immediately. They may take years for the Supreme Court to pick it up. We don't know. But we have proven that there is corruption, clear corruption, in our lower court systems and that's something we wanted to prove to the American people. Either the courts are working or they're not. The courts at the lower levels are not working. They are not doing what they're constitutionally obligated to do as their sworn duty. So we know that. So it turns our attention to the county level and in phase two, which we're going to launch on December 5th, so your audience can join us for a free, short press conference and Q&A session December 5th, tuesday at 5 pm Pacific, 8 pm Eastern, right on beyondtheconcom that's beyondtheconcom. We're going to take everybody through and we're going to launch phase two of this grant jury initiative.

Dr Ealy: 35:33

Now, phase two of the grant jury initiative is really simple. We have 3,143 counties in the United States. What we are doing is preparing templates based upon our initial filing, but also updated with full evidentiary packages from our team of information that's come out since we filed last year. I mean, there's been a lot of information that's come out that's damning since we filed. So we're putting all that together John Bowen's great work on death certificate analysis, which is the top of the country. Albert Beneviti's great work on fairs analysis, which is top of the country. Keith Wilkins' expert analysis on the Rico Enterprise fraud, which is tops of the country. Brian O'Shea's great work on One Health and how they're trying to construct a county-level blueprint for the World Health Organization to take over our country Information on the grant jury system and how to access it at the county levels.

Dr Ealy: 36:37

We're going to have trainings and we have monthly meetings and we're just going to put everything together for Americans, because we've had so many great Americans come and say, okay, what can I do? What can I do? I want to help, I want to help, and we were saying just sit tight for a second. We wanted to amass as much information as we could in phase one so that we can argue against what we know they're going to argue now, and we have great arguments. In the revised template that will be ready the 1st of January, we're going to be able to start training Americans on how to go to your local counties, how to file these petitions and how to get into this system, because somebody is going to break through, and the first folks that break through whether it's at county, whether it's at state, whether it's at federal, it doesn't matter the first folks that break through. That's going to be all she wrote for this eagle, and so we have over 3,000 cracks at it. We're going to take every single one of them, I suppose.

Dr Ealy: 37:42

Wow, yeah, we're working on some historic stuff here, and the thing that's really cool about it all is it's all grassroots, it's all done by good Americans. There's no sensationalism, there's no hyperbole. Here there's no hero ball. There's just good Americans who love their country, love their families, love God, working together and saying look, this is not going to stop. We're going to stand and we are going to exercise and exhaust every peaceful means. We have to investigate the greatest crime that has ever been perpetuated on humanity and make sure that the people who are guilty are thoroughly investigated, that they get their day in court to defend themselves, but that the evidence is so damning they won't be able to. I mean, that's what it comes down to. I don't think their AI computer models could have predicted the resolve of what lives in the burning spirit of an American who longs to be free.

HuttCast: 38:40

Let's go to that website again. What was that name?

Dr Ealy: 38:44

Beyondtheconcom. Beyondtheconcom, and you can get all kind of information. You can see where we are on the federal level. You can. You can we have videos on there. We have. I mean, we have so much information on them that explains everything and how it was constructed. And it really comes down to the simplicity of the CDC, the HHS, the NBSS. The people within those organizations violated federal laws to defraud the American people and steal trillions of dollars and sadly, tragically injure and kill millions of Americans and people around the world.

HuttCast: 39:26

really, Okay, as I'm working and talking now, I'm going to put Huttcast in there In my email address so I can follow through with this. Thanks for those comments, emma. And then follow through with Tim. Do you see this, or do you have a company that runs this? I?

Dr Ealy: 39:41

Will see it yeah okay, we have. We have teams that run it.

HuttCast: 39:44

All right, Well then you go ahead and push that through for me so I can make sure that hot cast stays up to the up to minute thing. That's the United.

Dr Ealy: 39:52

States.

HuttCast: 39:52

District Court for a district of Oregon and Portland Division.

Dr Ealy: 39:56

Yep, that's the Ninth Circuit Court, correct.

HuttCast: 40:00

And I see the the stamped date, which was 7th of March 22 15 49. Okay correct.

Dr Ealy: 40:08

Yeah, we are, we are official. A lot of people have been hearing of grand juries and Theronburg 2.0's and all this other stuff. None of that's beneficial. Those have been, at best those have been educational opportunities, but they have had no official impact. What people were doing that and putting on a show? We were actually doing the work, we were actually filing. We were actually starting the process of how do we, as Americans, get access to the system, the only system at our disposal that is there explicitly to investigate allegations of criminal fraud and willfulness conduct by elected officials. And Believe me when I tell you these, these evil folks they're brilliant and they do are doing everything they can to prevent us from getting to a grand jury with this information, information, and that's okay, because try as they may and try as they might, they will fail. We will get to a grand jury. We will get to a grand jury in 2024 and we are gonna bring this whole horrible heart house of cards down and burn it. If this, this has to be evicted from the face of the earth.

HuttCast: 41:25

I'm seeing here in the motion to dismiss on November, November 11th 22nd. That's not so.

Dr Ealy: 41:32

Your appeal is now right that's where our appeal is now, and there the judges have said the the appellate court that they originally had granted us four arguments for 15 minutes, which we were really excited about, because we hadn't we haven't been in court yet. We've been at this for three years and we still haven't been in court, because they don't want this anywhere near court. Like I said, tim, we're doing something that has never been attempted in US case history. We are attempting to access the grand jury by invoking a Section of federal law right that demands that the judge In panel, a grand jury, upon being so duly informed about alleged crimes, this the judge Hernandez is in dereliction duty In, and that's. That's just what it is.

Dr Ealy: 42:20

I see, appellate courts may be in dereliction of duty as well. That's just is a demonstration of corruption, because all that they had to rule on was public interest. Is there a public interest around this? And they neglected to do that and instead cited two Cases that they have been citing for. In every single court case that has been dismissed.

Dr Ealy: 42:44

Called on lack of standing okay and, and what we're gonna do in the Updated county level template is we are going to beat the hell out of those two cases in the template so that they cannot use those and any future arguments against anyone who files at the county level. So we had to do a little skirmish here and this, that's the thing that's hard for a lot of Americans. This takes time. This process, this is a war of attrition, this is a war of persistence. You have to decide that you are not going away, no matter what right, and you know. And you have to be willing to endure Rejection after rejection after rejection. And at this point, where we are is our resolve is stronger than it's ever been, and that's saying something because we've always been fully invested. But now my attitude is they picked on the long American right. I'm coming.

HuttCast: 43:46

As it should be right Exactly, can we have this conversation? The and someone corrected me it was it was a parable and it was the Wicked don't need rest and the rightists don't need any. Is that how that works?

Dr Ealy: 44:01

That's right, yeah right, but that's what it comes down to is just the greatest data geologist prevails. You know, I have my desire to be free and make sure every man, woman and child in our great nation remains free Burns deeply and and I will not rest until we have that achieved yet again. And it seems like every generation goes through a major challenge To that freedom and we have to respond to that challenge. In World War two is by storming beaches. In World War three, which is going on right now, unfortunately, it's going to be by storming Grand juries and getting grand juries going, because that is our sword in this case and that's good.

Dr Ealy: 44:54

It's gonna take down All of these evil people who think that they can buy their way into Emperorship of the unofficial, unelected emperors ship of the United States and of the world and that you know the people, we, the people, are a bunch of useless eaters and they get to decide when we're born, when we die and how we live in between and all that nonsense. No, you do not, so we're gonna show you, don't?

HuttCast: 45:23

this is a district court of Oregon, correct?

Dr Ealy: 45:25

Yes, this is a federal court federal district. This is fed. This organ is its own unique federal district. Yeah, so this is district nine.

HuttCast: 45:34

And is there a higher court than this? Yes, the Supreme Court. Okay, so what happens if we bounce there and get a goal, but it's supreme and they just kick it out?

Dr Ealy: 45:44

Well, well, the Supreme Court is figuring out what we're doing and if they want to be in rule on it right now we have a majority in the Supreme Court and it's our opinion that they're gonna want to hear a case like this, okay, so it's in the Supreme Court where we felt we would get a favorable rule. And we didn't expect to get a favorable rule, isn't Oregon if we think the Ninth Circuit Court is corrupt and we have a right to that opinion. So that's not me accusing them of anything, that's me just saying that's my opinion. I've got right under first amendment to be able to say that what we are doing is saying we're not gonna wait for the Supreme Court. You know, my hope is that it becomes a moot conversation because in 2024 we get this before a county level Grand jury and the county level grand jury.

Dr Ealy: 46:34

A lot of people here County Grand jury and think that they're restricted to the county they live in. No, that's not how it works. Grand juries at any level have the right to go wherever their investigation leads them, including to the Oval Office, including oh boy the United States Supreme Court, including to the To the chambers of Congress, and including into the companies known as Pfizer and Moderna and Johnson and Johnson. Grand juries, at any level, have a right to go anywhere they please. They have the power and authority to go anywhere they please. They do not need the permission of the courts, they do not need the permission of the president, they do not need the permission of anyone to do their duty, which is to thoroughly inquire and true presentment make of what they have found. In fact, grand jurors are made up of people just like me and you who are coming in and do jury duty. For example, they just happen to get on to a grand jury.

Dr Ealy: 47:40

Okay and what happens is they're the only Government officials that are sworn into term of service with the explicit requirement to tell the truth.

Dr Ealy: 47:55

Politicians don't even don't take an oath that requires them to tell the truth, nor does the president United States. Or do the Supreme Court justices? Hmm, but grand jurors? It's explicit in their oath of service that they are required to tell the truth, and that's where the presentments and indictments come in. So we just got to get this to a grand jury. We are know we're going to be able to achieve that with the help of a lot of great Americans in 2024, and if there is anybody listening right now who is on a grand jury or will be in the future, we encourage them to immediately subpoena myself and my entire team and and we will duly inform them and the grand there a grand jury chamber that they Are serving of everything that we have and also connect them to other great Americans, like Ed Dowd and David Martin and people of that nature who have done significant work as well, so that they can thoroughly investigate this and put together what I think is going to be the most scathing presentment and series of indictments that the world has ever seen.

HuttCast: 49:15

Wow, whatever that gas can do to help spread that word, you count on us. You tell your team to count on us. You can tell your Other doctors, constituents, that we're here to be a voice, a sound for you, whatever it takes to make this go out there, because I believe in that fight.

Dr Ealy: 49:36

Amen, we appreciate that so very much and we will take you up on it 25 minutes 31 seconds into this section.

HuttCast: 49:42

Do you want to prime that website again before we pull the panel? Do you have something else to add?

Dr Ealy: 49:48

No, I think let's just prime it. Okay, go ahead. Yeah. So we encourage everybody to get involved with us beyondtheconcom. Beyondtheconcom, december 5th, 5pm Pacific, 8pm Eastern will be our first kickoff for phase two of the Grand Jury Initiative and then, beginning in January, we will be having and hosting monthly meetings for everybody who's participating, and you will have all the resources you need updated templates, how to get these two year grand juries in your counties, and full evidentiary packages to deliver as well. We are going to give Americans all the tools they need to seek justice and make an absolute beautiful mess of what these criminals hope is a red carpet walk to their own you know, to their own rulership of the world.

HuttCast: 50:48

We're fighting these criminals in their house. You got it.

Dr Ealy: 50:52

We're going after them and we're going to have names. We know who we're going after.

HuttCast: 50:55

We're going after them, and how can it be peaceful at that point?

Dr Ealy: 50:59

Well, you know the grand jury is there to investigate and I think if there is an ongoing investigation to grand jury it gives us great hope and it also gives us a reason to put a little pause on that second amendment thought that we might have in time and time.

HuttCast: 51:18

So there ends the peaceful transition. I'm looking at your website and I see injured share a story. You know we got a lot of listeners. So if you are injured and you want to share this story, log into their site, sign up. They got a donate button. They've got get conference replays beyond the concom, download the court documents If you're in that side of the world. I mean just, it's a whole wealth of information that looks very, very well put together.

Dr Ealy: 51:47

Appreciate that.

HuttCast: 51:48

Okay. Well then, is there anything else we got to talk about? I know your beeper went off and I don't want to go and keep you anymore.

Dr Ealy: 51:55

Oh, no, you're totally fine. And no, it's just, it's just gratitude, it's just sending a lot of love and gratitude to Americans and really anyone anywhere in the world listening. There are people who've been fighting for you for a very long time and I think, if I know, if it was me and I was losing hope, it would make me feel really good to know that there are Americans who are all over this and that they're going to position me for a little payback too, because that's something I'd be wanting at this point, if I felt like I had been wronged or someone had that I love, had been injured or killed by these damn shots, or if I had lost my business, or even God forbid one of my children had committed suicide and have disbared during this horrible time. I mean, the destruction is unprecedented in world history and there has to be an investigation and people have to be held accountable for the fraud that really created the opportunity for that destruction to take place Definitely accountable.

HuttCast: 53:03

They have war crimes courts. For that reason, maybe this isn't a war crime, but it's still a crime. Still a crime, dr Eley, thank you. Thank you, you heard him do what you can do engage, jump on the website, even if it's worldwide, you guys jump in on the website and let's see if we can get something to happen for him. Okay, this is going to pull the pen. We are 30 minutes in the second segment and it'll probably be an hour 10 minutes show because of the pre-roll and post-roll. But thanks for tuning in. Huttcast might not be back next week. Got to get some shoulder work done and I don't know if I can move the mouse at that point. So we're crossing my fingers. But for Huttcast, see you next time. Thank you, doc, we'll catch you next time. And that's a wrap for Huttcast. Huttcast is again a pragmatic approach to seeing things how some people see them. If you like our show, give us a thumbs up on the Facebook site. Again for Huttcast, thank you again. Have a wonderful evening.