.jpg)
The Tefilah Podcast
The Tefilah Podcast
Tehilim 93: Hashem Moloch REDUX (Part 2)
Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.
Have any questions, insights, or feedback? Send me a text!
Length: 1 hour 1 minute
Synopsis: This evening (6/17/26), in our last Wednesday night Tehilim shiur of the season, we took another pass at our perek. After reviewing the text, the questions and problems, and our approaches from last time. We then learned through the Meiri's first approach and the Radak's commentary, providing us with two interpretations of the perek. We developed them a bit and attempted to understand this perek's relationship with the previous one. Did we succeed? Somewhat. While we now have a working understanding - well, TWO working understandings - of the perek, and each pasuk, I don't think anyone felt like we really cracked it. There wasn't the satisfying, "Aha!" that we often feel at the end of our learning. Oh well. That just means we get to come back for another attempt in the future, God willing!
In my opinion, this was a great year of Tehilim-learning! I enjoyed spending nearly the entire year within the same set of perakim. I'm excited to revisit this in an attempt to grasp the big picture, now that we have nearly all the pieces.
-----
מקורות:
תהלים צג
מאירי
רד"ק
בראשית א:א-ט
תרגום אונקלוס - שמות טו:א
ירמיהו טז:יד-טו
תרגום רס"ג - הערות הרב קאפח
-----
The Torah Content for this month is currently without a sponsor. If you're interested in sponsoring, let me know!
-----
If you've gained from what you've learned here, please consider supporting my work via Patreon, Venmo, Zelle, or PayPal — links below. Even a small contribution helps cover production costs and gives me the freedom to create more Torah content. To sponsor a day's or week's worth of content, or to inquire about tutoring or teaching, reach me at rabbischneeweiss at gmail. Thank you for listening, reading, and supporting my efforts to make Torah ideas available and accessible to everyone.
Patreon | [Venmo: @Matt-Schneeweiss] | [Zelle/PayPal: mattschneeweiss at gmail]
Substack | YouTube | YUTorah | Instagram
Podcasts: The Stoic Jew | Machshavah Lab | The Mishlei Podcast | Rambam Bekius | The Tefilah Podcast
Okay, this is the last Tillem Shear of the season. Uh two strikes against uh against me. One is uh I am totally exhausted, ready for the year to end. Tried working on this, nothing. Not nothing, not nothing, uh, but was not uh not successful. And then also Ken had a phone call that he said it could take five minutes, it could take an hour, ended up taking the whole hour and a half of our learning time. So we did not get a chance to prepare it. So, best case scenario, we read this and we think about it and we come up with a brilliant theory, and we end off on a on a high note. Worst case scenario, uh, we meander and and read through the radak and maybe someone else, and then and then it is what it is. Okay, so no uh no promises. All right, so let's review. All right, uh five psukin. Uh this is telling Saadi Gemo. Arnoi Malak, Geus Lavesh, Lavish Arnoi, Oz Hisa Zar, aftikontevil baltimov. So Hashem reigns, and we noticed uh that um literally it is in the past tense, but uh we said we could play fast and loose with the tenses here. Oops, let me just uh make this bigger. So Hashem, we I think we said uh reigns is just the smoothest, I guess, uh more so than the past tense. Um Gayus Lavesh, he is clothed in greatness. I think still greatness is probably the best literal translation of Gaius. Um uh Lavish Hashem, the Hashem is clothed, o's he sazar, he girds himself with strength, ah tikon table baltimot, he the uh indeed the inhabited land or the earth he established uh firmly, not to be shaken. Baltimot. Your throne, this is addressing Hashem. I don't think we noticed the second person uh last time. Uh your throne is established from long ago. Meaz, me'olamata, you are from eternity. The rivers raised, oh Hashem. The rivers raise their voice, the rivers will uh raise their crashing waves. Uh, we didn't really know what dachyam is, but crashing waves, I think, fits in the cleanest with the shot. Um, okay, then we got this uh ambiguity of the mem here. Mi kolos maimrabim, adirim mishburyam, adir bamarum adunnoi. So it either means um all the English translations we did said it's more than the sound of many waves, waters, more than the breakers of the sea are mighty, is Hashem mighty on high. I wanted to say from the sound of mighty waters, of many waters, um the breakers of the sea are mighty, Hashem is mighty on high, but we'll go with English for now. And then the non-sequitary at the end, Edo Sacha Neemnum Odeska Na'ava Kodesh, Adoro Noi Larchemim. Your testimonies are exceedingly trustworthy, holiness is befitting your house, Hashem for eternity. All right, our questions were, I'll make this a little bit bigger. What's the mushroom of Hashem being clothed and girded in strength? Also, we didn't notice, I don't think we noted this, but like, why is the mushel uh dropped after the first pasak? Um, right? It's not like this is it's not like the whole theme of everything is Hashem's garments. I think that's like it, right? It doesn't come back. Okay. Uh if we say that this is evoking the imagery of the king going out to war, where are the enemies? It's a very uh the scene feels very empty here, right? Not even any creations in terms of like entities, just water and earth and land. Is there even any land? Not directly, right? Just by implication of Tefel. Um, okay, but no, like Arets. Okay. Uh three, what does it mean that the land is established so we won't falter? And what is the uh what's with the off, the indeed or the however or the even. What's up with the waters? Why naharos specifically? What are they doing? I also uh didn't notice this last time. Why Naharos uh into yam? Because it does see Mishbre Yam, right? And uh I think last time we got was remember we talked about rapids, right? I think we just missed the word yam. Maybe it's because we were saying more than the breakers of the sea, but I don't, I it just didn't register in my mind that like there's rivers and then there's the breakers of the sea. Mishbre yam, not just Mishbar in on the uh the the Naharos. Okay, then we've got what are they doing, why waves? Okay, then we have um what is the comparison between Hashem being Adir and the waters being Adirim? It is making an overt comparison here, especially if you go with the more than. What's up with the imagery of Hashem being Bamarom, especially in comparison to water, which is like definitively not Bamarom, it's at sea level, all right? Um, what are, and it's not necessarily sea level, but whatever, uh in the arm. All right, what are the Eidos doing here? What are they? I mean, Plaimshot is Eidos is the Mitsos that um testify to historical interventions like UTS Mitsraim or like uh Pesach and Chavez. Uh, what is Mikdash doing here? Again, just shows up at the end. Uh, what is being said about it? Uh, what is La Orach Yamim doing here? Is it describing Hashem as eternal or beseeching him for something? Uh again, Hashem is eternal, um, his house as eternal, uh, or is it beseeching him for something? And then 10, what's the khiddish? What's the point here? And then we gotta add, um, how, if at all, does this connect to Mizmor Shir Leon Hashabas? Okay, I think those were our questions. Any other what was that? Yeah.
SPEAKER_04Um and these are something step together, why is what up? I mean, what can you argue?
SPEAKER_00Right. That's a good question, also, right. And if they are connected, why split them at all? Right? Um, and I just want to check something out here. Of the other Prakim here, we have Kelna Komos, which does not begin with an intro. Yeah, none of these begin with an intro. Fine. All right, I was just wondering if there was any other uh mismore. Uh in fact, let me just check all of them. Kelnah's Luchunranana, Shirulashem, Hashem Malach, Mizmore Shiro Lashem. Okay, so that's a Mizmore in 98, Hashem Malach Yu Guz Amim, and then Mizmore Latada. All right, fine, so it's not not really consistent. Yeah, that's a good question, though. Okay. All right, so then we went to the pivot. Now, what why do we say the pivot is here? We said one one and two are definitely split off from three and four, and then we said if you had to lump five with something, then it would go with one and two, but five could also be its own thing.
SPEAKER_02Yeah, I think we I think we started with it could go with one and two, but I thought we ended with that, it's just more of a third.
SPEAKER_00Yeah, tack on, yeah, right. So not not the most pivoty pivot, but uh definitely three and four are waters. That's what we got. And then we got the um the king imagery in one and two, right? So if there's anything, there's kings and waters. Uh yeah, what are you saying, I say?
SPEAKER_03Like um, why do you say Lavesh Hashem White? Like Hashem Melak Malach Lavesh Hashem. Yeah. How are we part of that?
SPEAKER_00Yeah, uh, let me look at the town name again. Uh shem malah, us lavish. Lavish, arishem, o sea saar. And we said that no one translates this successfully as one phrase. So the Gayuslavesh and Lavesh Hashem are definitely separate.
SPEAKER_01Right.
SPEAKER_00Yeah. Yeah. I'm not so bothered by that. I feel like that's just a poetic repetition thing. We see that.
SPEAKER_03Like the O's and Pizza, Pizza R. Like um base sounds like it should have to do with the O's. The way we're translating it, it seems like it doesn't it just is that anchored himself with yeah.
SPEAKER_00So I don't know if this is where your question is coming from, but in the clothing muscle they go together, but the verb is different for belts and for garments. Like you never say your Lovesh a Chagor.
SPEAKER_04Right.
SPEAKER_00Right. So I don't see how they could be merged. Um once you're saying Hashem is clothed and you're repeating that, then I don't see how you can incorporate the he girds himself within the same verb. Like this is as close as it gets, I think. Like just putting them next to each other. Yeah. Okay, so let's review our our our our general approaches. Uh so we had, I think, um, three full-ish theories. We had Isaiah's theory, which took this on its own, which I think was a good theory. So I'm just gonna read my summary here because I don't remember. Hashem created the world, but in that world, the waters change and shape it, change it and shape it. Hashem set the world down to be a certain way, um, uh, but to have certain laws, and those are the testimonies that are trustworthy and never fail. I think we saw the Ibn Ezra says that his power is greater than them because their power is within the world, but Hashem's power is over them. In other words, there are all these like dynamic forces that have so much power, but the thing, the like I gave my uh my catchphrase in um the Shimona S-ray, Kel Elyon, the power that powers the powers, right? That there are powerful things in the world, but Hashem is the power that powers those powers. Um, so he's the real power behind the powers. Um, so that's the idea that that Hashem is is more mighty than they are. These are the things that shape land, and that's like a like eroding land is like pretty much as powerful as you can get. I mean, earthquakes, fine, okay, but like in terms of like the shaping of the world, but Hashem is the one who shaped those. Okay, fine. But then our question was, what is Mikdash doing here? So then I think I wasn't happy with this last time, right? Isaiah said we're trying to shape the mikdash and make it kadosh. That was the one I wasn't happy with. It was too drushy for me. I don't remember what I said. I said it's not Mikdash, either basically is the universe, like we know the bias is um uh what do you call it? Is um uh a mushal for the for the universe. And then it's describing as Hashem Kadosh vis-vis that universe, like he's transcending it, uh, or Nava is being used here in the sense of abode, which is a reference to Hashem's eternity. Either way, I wasn't happy with it. Okay, then we got Mosh 11's theory, which is that in the previous parak, there was a call to the Ish Ba'ar Uxil, the foolish bourris and bulboish and foolish man, uh, people who fail to recognize God's universe, and then after that, they went out to look at the world. I think we're talking about our parak here, meaning in our parak, we're looking at the world.
SPEAKER_01Yeah, in between these two, basically.
SPEAKER_00Okay, right, right. So in between, I'm gonna say that. Um, between the two Praakim, is there something sticky here? Right. Between the two Prakim, uh Praakim, they went out to look at the world. Now there are two concerns. One, they recognize Hashem as the Ishmael Khama. Oh, that's another thing we mentioned, right? Is the Hashem um as king going out and being mighty does have war, uh war leader uh imagery. Uh, but they wonder how being so powerful is going to create something stable. But then we do see uh but we do see parts of the world that do look unstable, but then that's just looking at things superficially because there's still chakma and order in that. That's the same mistake that the the foolish guys made in the previous parak. Uh, you need to have uh more faith by learning the Torah and the Mikdash as a Malcolm Torah. In other words, the last plus is directing you to how to to um solve the problem of not seeing the order and stuff. Yeah. So I this I think also a promising approach. And I think now this is where your question really shines, which is why do we need this to be a separate uh parak, right? Yeah, okay. So then there was my approach, which I did not write down to my chagrin, um, but also built on the last parak. And I think what I wanted to say was that the last parak was talking about in the state of Olam Hazah, uh meaning in Gallus, then you have two strata. You have the Khachamim who used Shabbos the way it was meant to be used, and who recognized the Khachma of Hashem in the universe, and therefore they recognize the Khachma Hashem undergirding there was a belt muscle that slipped in, uh, underlying the like uh the this the seeming disorder in existence. Um, and uh therefore the the the those Khachamim are not bothered by Sadiq Viral and Rush of Atovla because they know that um that when the wicked succeed, it's to destroy them forever, and they know that there will be a time. Oh, sorry, and then so the Khachamim can see it now and they use their Shabbos that way. In the future, there will be an event where everyone will see it. That's the Yom Hadinha Gadal in Yumosa Mashiach, uh, or whatever that is. So everyone will recognize, oh, the Rashim are punished. And I don't know what that is, but the Naveem talk about it all the time. Okay. Then there's the unfolding of the Yidya Hashem over humanity, where people will actually reach the level of the Khachamim and be able to see it like in a primary way, not in a, well, evidently Hashem is just. They'll be able to like see the actual justice. So that was Miz Brash Alim Shabbat. And then what I wanted to say, I think, is that this is describing the state that the world will be in afterwards, but I was not able to land the plane. But that's where I want this to be. In other words, Miz Brashir Mushabis is describing the future from the present, and this is describing the future per se, like how the future will be. Oh, and I remember the other thing I was gonna say is that that in reality this harkens to um the opening period of creation. And I actually saw someone who says this is the Mi'iri. Uh, I didn't do the whole Mi'iri. Oh no, I did do the whole Mi'iri. But um, I guess when I said I didn't prepare it, I meant that I frantically prepared it and didn't get anything. Um, but um uh so Miri gives two complete ways of learning the parag. The first one is as a standalone, and the second one is uh is connecting to Mashiach. Gamzen Mismor Nira Lisha Rom is alchida sha'olam. This is also talking about the creation of the world, bifrat alhi galus haarets, bihavos ha maim el malkomachad, specifically in the um revelation the the exposure, the exposing of the earth when the waters gathered to one place.
SPEAKER_04Um what's it also mean? What what song uh uh Ms.
SPEAKER_00Rajalim Shabbas is talking about that, yeah. Yeah, so let's just read the the puzzle here uh to get the day, uh see what actually happens on the day. Um so you've got day one, uh light, day two, the rakia, and then day three. So let the waters be under the sky be collected to one place and let the dry land be seen, and so it was. But you uh the waters were mentioned before, right? Uh it was the same waters, but there was no earth exposed yet. And then we'll see what we're talking about. The very first pasuk. Yeah, the very first pasuk is yeah, the or sorry, second pasuk, I guess. Baharats hai sasso vavohu, bakosh alpine tahom, ruh allohim rachavis alpine amaim. Yeah, we don't have no idea what those waters are. Is that what you're talking about? You're talking about the yeah, those waters, yeah, yeah. And then there's also the the waters in the Rakia, the upper waters and the lower water. A lot of water going on here. Yeah. Um, okay, then we've got um Vayikra Elohim Li Abasha Eret, Ulumikvahemaim Kariyamim, Vyarlo Kim Kitov. So God called the dry land land, and the gathering of water he called seas, and God saw that it was good. Okay, then he creates the plant. Yeah, right. So the Yiri said that, but what I wanted to say is that that I guess I want to say it was the primordial waters, and that Hashem was Melech before the universe was created, and then that's what we're alluding to when we describe the desolate um I can't call it landscape, universecape, cause cosm. I don't know, whatever it was. And then that's what we're alluding to when we say um uh meolamata, that you were from eternity. But then we say that you will be recognized as king in Yimos Mashiach, but it's the same kingship, you know. It's just that, like, it's not like Hashem became king at the time of Mashiach, he always was king, and the Khachamim always recognized that, and it's just that the world doesn't catch up until Yemos Mashiach. I think that's what I want to say last time. Yeah.
SPEAKER_03I don't know if this is a little bit different than what you're saying, but is is it kind of like like Hashem? He created the world and in the beginning, like there was there were these like waters were like uh primordial type. And then they like start they he spread earth, and then the waters were on earth and they were doing around and doing what happens in positive three group three.
SPEAKER_00So it's a good question how the Miri learns if he's learning this is all happening on day three. Well, we'll read a little bit more, we don't have to read the whole thing, but uh uh just to see how he takes it. So I think he means the uh the angels and the lower creations, meaning us that recognize some of God's exaltedness that is so powerful. Okay, that's interesting. He girded himself with strength and might by creating the world out of nothing. You gotta have a lot of strength to do that, right? You think it takes strength to like move matter? How about creating matter? Uh the emtaol, and when he made the table in the middle of the world. So I think that's establishing what table is is uh, I guess the picture of all the seas and then the waters in the middle, or the earth is in the middle, the land, I mean. Baltimot Batanua Lushumzad, and it's stable, it doesn't move around. It's not like a ship floating on top of the water that's uh unstable. A Vishlafarsh dechos, you can also explain it by way of uh poetry, shall kill Mislabesh. Uh oh, that sounds dangerously um the gaus. Okay, all right. Uh he's mislabesh in uh in in greatness. Greatness suits him. God uh suits greatness. I don't know what that means. That's like um that's like the Pashat in um it's befitting. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Like with lush on the fitting, yeah. Um, but that that's like the thing I always quote from the Targum on Az Yashir. Um when we see Kika Ogaa on that very pasak, um uh Ashilashem Kika Ogaa, Targum says, Are is gai al gave sanaya? God exalts himself over the those who are, he makes himself high, he raises himself high over those who are high. The geusa dilehi, and greatness belongs to him because anything else that's great is only great because of Hashem. So so you can only really call Hashem great. You can't really call anything else great because everything else has greatness that's borrowed or endowed by Hashem. Okay, aftikon Klomark he colo geus siba loco harisas matzav. Any greatness is the cause of any breaking of a situation. But Hashem is the one who who endows and sets up the earth in its uh stability. I don't know what that means. Yeah. Um Kisaha, who she'll be seabor brias has shamaim. So maybe we were talking about the prime memorial waters. Because you see, this is the difficult thing, right? Is that in the beginning of Breishis, it does describe the Shemaim and the Aret, and then the waters gather, and then the dry land they call Eretz, right? Not they Hashim calls it eretz, right? So, like you know, I I I I never really know how to read this first posuk.
SPEAKER_04Areth, or that if it's the name of Aurashus.
SPEAKER_00So right, so so the the I I think the simplest way to read it is the first Pasuk. But it's not gonna help us, I'll tell you why. The simplest way to read is the first Pasuk is an overall introduction that God created the heavens and the earth, and then everything else is is like you know, double click on that, and then here's how it happened. Okay, but then the problem is you're gonna have to confront Haarat His Hatovavohu. That's one Aret. In other words, even if you ignore the first Pasuk, Haarat Isatovavohu, but then when God separates the dry land, he calls that one eret as well. So, like, what are the two erats? We won't get sucked into it trying to learn my separaties here, but um, but I'm just saying, like, it sounds like now he's saying he's um he begins to talk about the creation of the heavens, which kind of implies that the water before might have been the primordial water. Let's see, I didn't get this far. Um, I I I skipped right to the Mashiach stuff. They were created in their array, I think, and in the utmost of their perfection. Umi aas, resulum, mi'az me is hibaram. And as soon as he created them, um ata, bras alko. So God existed before quote unquote the earth, uh, everything was created because um he created it. Uh, Romas Al Haqabasamaim. Okay, there you go. That doesn't help us. The waters raise their voices, that alludes to the gathering of the water. So the question is, is that on day three, or was that what we were talking about earlier? I mean, it's definitely day three, but was that what we were talking about earlier as well? Okay, that might answer your question. That they are making noises when they pass over in a flood over the place, that they crush it and destroy it. So that is shaping the land. All right, we got this far. We might as well go on. Adirmish Priyam Rotulamar Galeham, the the waves of the sea, ki um Adir Bamuromarashem, Lasos M Ulashan Stivam. Hashem is stronger than them. Ah, look, to make them and to change their nature. So that is like the idea you were saying is that that God is the one who sets the properties of water. So it is not even in control of itself. It's powerful, but only because he set the limits of its power. And then Vlius Kolehanyanim no daimitsada kabbalah. Whoa, interesting. All this is only known because of the received tradition. I guess he's saying, like, we only know what half how the creation of the universe went because of the the Torah. I don't think he means Torshabal Pe here, by the way.
SPEAKER_04I think he means like of uh of Kabala isn't referred to like uh medieval or just like uh the secretar pasta.
SPEAKER_00No, no, no, it never refers to that uh in the Rushana. No, Kabbalah all usually refers to Torshibal Peh, but here he must mean yeah, he must mean uh referring to like the maybe the Perusim on the Torshib Sun. Could be. The footnote guy says Mesuris Shikibal no me abusino, uh the tradition that we received from her fathers. I mean, I guess we knew this before we had the written Torah, uh from uh well actually I don't know how we I mean technically Noah, you know, and Survivors knew this. And yeah.
SPEAKER_05He's not just saying like the posak, he's saying like the proper interpretation.
SPEAKER_00Correct. That's also true. Right, right. Yeah. Venim Shahimle munishachidush. And uh and this follows um from it follows the belief in the creation of the world. Uh Vihim Him had varmikal and Bamilas Edu, so Eidos here is not mitzvos edus, and it's not the laws of nature, it is testimony that we received about how God created the universe. It's trustworthy. Ulvesha hanoda mamatzachamim bale zosaimuna. So that your house, which is known in the state, in this in the session, the standing of the chakamim who possess this emuna. Um, he says in the footnote, Shahim Hamatsuim Bamikdash, hey Mafarsmi Hamuna, they're the ones who publicize it. Naba Kodesh, Rosalamar, Nae Lukasha Ulhadro. It is befitting to sanctify you and beautiful uh glorify you. Lolkofrim, dabar, not the kofrim, not for the kofrim to do this, that they don't believe anything. Um, Rakmashi Chaifa Hekesh Hamosi. Okay, yeah. Yeah, uh, I know why he's using Kabbalah now. Uh, they only believe what is dictated by logical proof, the exercise, and which is dictated by uh philosophical speculation. So this is classic Niri. Okay, classic Miri, almost not almost every, but many Derek Nisters and Mishley talk about this is Mi'iri is very, very big on there's two kinds of philosophical truths. There's the ones that you can prove or arrive at independently through philosophical speculation, in which case you should do that. But then there's the ones that you only know through Masora or through Navua, and you should not try to rely on philosophy in those areas because it's not provable. Uh, you need actual nibuah for it. So he's saying that these Kofrim are the people who only believe what their sechel and their philosophy like dictates, and they're not gonna believe this because back then there was no way to prove that the universe was created. So, like, they're gonna deny all this. Um uh he says, Umachala pne umakhalapne uh and then uh he beseeches God, I guess the psalmist beseeches God, Shiyamod Bekimo. I don't think it means that God should last. What is that 19? Oh, that his house, okay, that his house should stand uh permanently. Not that it should be destroyed in the end. He's davning for a time when one should be afraid or can be afraid that it will be destroyed. But who calls mancheshara umus shultanus? That's whenever the other nations have dominion. So until the time when the earth is filled with knowledge of Hashem, and then people will not, and then they won't be afraid anymore. Ukmohu, kilo ezovcha arashar ima sisi isashardibati lach, in a katsark lahtach, then you won't need a promise anymore. So, in other words, he's saying basically until we get to this point of Mushiach um where the truth will be vouchsafed in mankind because everyone will know it, then I need to dive in that the house remain. What was it?
SPEAKER_03House of the people who know Hashem.
SPEAKER_00Um, well he's saying the Khacham you know it in the house, but I guess figuratively, when the house is in its destruction, then it is passed down in the Khachamin.
SPEAKER_03What is he diving for?
SPEAKER_00It sounds like he's the Funno guy's understanding that he's dominating for the basin mikdash to persist and not be destroyed.
SPEAKER_03I thought he's talking about a time when it doesn't exist. He's saying he's dominating during a time.
SPEAKER_00He's dominating during a time well he's dominating during a time Shiesh Le Fahid Bakurbano, when you could be when you you could be afraid that it would be destroyed. And Kavakomere if it actually is destroyed, like now, I think. Uh yeah, Moshe.
SPEAKER_04Yeah, so one um I guess uh just I guess um usually answering the question when we recite those.
SPEAKER_00Oh yeah, right, right.
SPEAKER_04I mean I guess basically in kind of doesn't there and something what's saying is that now when you don't when you don't when you go to the basic Mikdash, you're praying for the the the truths that were passed down over time, or not to be right philosophically, to not be uh destroyed or lost.
SPEAKER_00Yeah, and that also answers the your question about um the relationship to Ms. Rashil and Mishabas, because Ms. Rashiel and Ms. is articulating the belief that we're trying to pass down and the significance of it. And then this is like a I don't know what the whole thing is doing, but this last puzzle because it's fila that that should be preserved. And uh side note, um, when I was in um uh okay, I gotta pause this part way through. When I was in uh when I was out of town last week, um and they uh they did the Chris of Torah of I didn't click it yet. I'm gonna just pause it at a certain part. Um and they were at they read the Makoshish 8 team, right? The guy who gathered uh wood on Chavez and uh and you know it's Khayev Misa. So uh an elderly man leaned over to me and said, he was like shaking his head, and he said, like, like really, like you get killed for something like that. He wasn't really asking it as a question, so I also didn't want to answer him. So I was thinking, how would I answer someone who said this? It's a very basic question, right? It was why of why is uh you know doing a malacha on Shabbat? And and you know, the the Torah is going out of its way. I mean, it happened, but like the Torah's going out of its way in the example to show like it was a very, very like this guy was not building his house on Chavez, he was gathering sticks, which is like you know, very, very tame, right? So like why is it high of Misa? Like seems extreme. You have an answer? Like I'm sure everyone has intuition, yeah.
SPEAKER_05I guess the first thing comes to mind, although I feel like there's more, is that uh it does a simple example to show you that it's not that there are mixes that are beyond your logic, you know, and like not everything has to make perfect sense to you. There are things that are inherited, I guess. And like part of it is that really looks the the the the would be like you're denying what a short you're doing, and that that's like okay, but that's not really a Shabbos specific answer, right?
SPEAKER_00Can't you say that for yeah, uh-huh? Okay, right, yeah, yeah, yeah. I think I think he was asking about Shabbos specifically.
SPEAKER_03Yeah, and it's like Shabbos is the myth of that keeps alive this idea that Shem Green world, right? Right without Shabbos.
SPEAKER_00If we lose the the entity of Shabbos, then we lose that yeah, yeah, I think once I I think that is uh that that's yeah, what do you say something else, Mosha?
SPEAKER_04Yeah, I was also gonna say that on the part of um the water, the water current. Just naturally reminded how like uh earthquakes and conflict shifting as well as like bringing like canyons are formed because of like you know, canyons water water is slowly.
SPEAKER_00Wait, are you answering this question or you're answering doing something completely different? Oh, fine. So I want to answer this question. Yeah, yeah. So so the the I'll I'll say my version of it. And then so I want to say that um that um first of all, I think he's making the methodological mistake, which is that if something is small, then how can it have such a big effect? Like that's just like a uh a dumb mistake. And the the the example I want to use is like if you are you know a in charge of safety at a nuclear power plant, and you're like, why does this one little number or this little thingy matter? Like, really, it's gonna be such a big deal. Yeah, it's gonna be a big deal. Like it results in a nuclear meltdown, you know. And here we're obviously not dealing with a physical destruction, but this idea of God as the creator is so fundamental to the entire way that we orient ourselves around uh to reality and to what you're and to ourselves that like and it and because it's only because for most of humanity it was not provable, you know, and even still there are people arguing against it. Check out physics to God, um, then like it is still very threatened. And so it's kept alive through people keeping the institution from Shabbos, you know. Um, and um, I was gonna say as well that uh right, if people stop keeping it, the idea can get lost. I was gonna say two other things. One is I think they asked Richard Feynman, like if you had to like write down, like if all of science got like destroyed, and you should write down like one sentence to like give to the generation that was gonna try to reconstruct it, what would you give? And I don't remember the exact sentence, but it was something about like like the theory of like everything is is like you know, is uh particles and forces or something like that, you know, like some like some basic paradigm that took humanity a while to get, you know. Um and so like this is this is like precious uh in in that way. And then I was gonna say one other thing also, which is a side point to this side point, which is I said, you know, I I also knew this guy was very Zionist. And I said, like, what's the big deal if you just burn the Israeli flag? Or he's also very American, you burn the American flag, right? Like, who cares? It's just a piece of cloth, right? Well, you're making a statement, and it's not the actual thing you're doing. Like, yeah, if you burn a flag, the physical act does not affect you or anyone else in any way, but it's a statement, and you're only Khayev Misa when you violate Shabbos bemazied after being warned not to do it in Khaev Misa. So it's it's an act of defiance. It's not just like I think when people hear the question of Shabbos being Khaiv Misa, they think, oh, I accidentally turn on the light and and and and the religion's gonna kill me. Like, no, it's like it is an act of defiance that you're overtly saying, I do not believe in what this stands for, you know. So you had a question on what Isaiah was saying? Yeah, yeah. Yeah.
SPEAKER_05Um I I thought this question would then be basically what you're saying with them, but okay, I okay, so I guess shamas is important. Yeah, but then what is what is carrying sticks have to do with shamas?
SPEAKER_00Right. So that I think the the you have to explain, you know, the premise of the question is that there are 39 malachas, and this is a malacha, you know, and uh but I think the thing that was bothering him was not I think the thing that was bothering him was not how is sticks Shabbos, it's given that sticks is Shabbos, how would you kill why would you kill someone for it? You know, that's like extreme, yeah, yeah. Um yeah, Moshe, what was your point? Okay, all right. So I guess the Mi'iri ended up taking a very similar approach to you. Let's just see if we could bring it home though, about like what, yeah, what is the let's just summarize the Mi'iri while we have him and then see if we can get what the um what the uh main idea is here. Okay, so the Mi'iri says uh this is about Petusha'olam uh and describes um the primordial waters and the initial gathering of the uh of the waters to reveal the earth, uh, and underscores how Hashem has uh total power over everything, in that he is the one uh who who uh who dictates what the waters can and can't do. And then um we only know this because of the Edu of um of the Kabbalah uh which is preserved by the Chachamim who who hang out in the Mikdash. And then uh this concludes with a tfila uh to preserve the mikdash um during the long time period where its destruction uh and consequently the destruction of these ideas is a real possibility, uh is a real possibility. Yeah.
SPEAKER_03So like if we didn't have like the law, then wouldn't you not we wouldn't be able to say this? Like we wouldn't be able to say this.
SPEAKER_00Yeah, it wouldn't have a basis, right? It would just be like any other myth. Yeah.
SPEAKER_04Um I think that's what I think about I do want to say what before and and same for the question, which is what's specifically about the water that is describing the shrimp power of everything.
SPEAKER_00Right.
SPEAKER_04And yeah, and and that was you see that water in in nature is that which is that which literally does uh sculpt the earth insofar as it we see if it creates canyons and it's uh how to stuff that to come. Yeah, so why is there so why water used about it?
SPEAKER_00Yeah, so I'm not doubting the truth of that. I'm doubting I don't think uh they um I don't know what they knew about they definitely didn't know to comic plates, but I don't know. They must I I I just it's hard to know what they knew about um like did people realize that the Grand Canyon, like Native Americans around, did they realize that it was carved out by water? Like, I don't know, like to us that's obvious, but like I just don't I don't know. And certainly on a small level, they could see it, you know. Well, I well, if we're trying to learn the Mi'iri, right? If we're trying to learn the Peric, then that's whatever you think however works. But if we're learning the Miri, I just want to be wary of projecting our ideas onto the Mi'iri, yeah, yeah. So I but the question I think we do need to ask here is like, what does this add to um to uh t Saudi Bayes and um and why isn't this part of it? And the the the biggest thing we have going for us is tfila, right? Yeah.
SPEAKER_03I mean he's the the fact that he mentions like you wouldn't know this if you have this blood and like the those who those who uh have that end up going to like erroneous ideas, right?
SPEAKER_00Oh, so that's interesting. Okay, uh maybe that's good. Um it's the error that the fools make, but it's the error that the Khachamin are prone to. Because he criticizes the Khachamin here, right? That they reject the Kabala and they only rely on Hekesha Sihli, right? Right. So it's like the it's the um opposite error of the fool. It's the same mistake, but from the opposite direction.
unknownRight.
SPEAKER_00I mean, that's the way he says it, right? So let me just try this out here, right? So so oh excuse me, the um the fools in the previous parak um uh uh failed to grasp the Chachma in Masubres, uh, and that resulted in all the problems they had with God's justice. Um this parak uh criticizes uh criticizes a similar mistake made by the philosophical who who attempt to rely exclusively um on their minds to the point uh where they deny the Kabbalah um uh and fall into a similar error, right? Not an error that is unsophisticated, but uh uh yeah, not the the you know the the error of the unthinking, unsophisticated, uh unwashed masses, but the error of the people who give supremacy uh to their own thinking uh over the Kabbalah. Right. Yeah.
SPEAKER_04I and that that is a good idea. I just wish the puzzle spelled at least some of this out of here.
SPEAKER_00I know, right? There's no people in the puzzle.
SPEAKER_04I mean if you even just start off with like right.
SPEAKER_00Well, here's the thing. The allusion to people is an eightoseka. Someone, whether you say eidos are mythos or whether it's Navua, someone is uh it's testifying to someone someone is getting the testimony, right? And then basica is a reference to a human institution, assuming it's the base of Mikdash. And if you say that the um that this is a tfila, which uh people say then there is a mispala as well. So it's like it is alluding to there being people here. I I'm with you though, in the sense that like it would be nice if it if it like you know was a little bit more explicit. Yeah. All right, let's really quickly look at the Radak because the Radak is taking the approach that it's about Yimos Mashiach here.
SPEAKER_01Um doesn't the raise the button?
SPEAKER_00He does say that. Uh, I want to do the Radak because he says it better. And I know the Radak is longer, but um uh but we're gonna do it anyway. Um, not the whole thing. Okay, so he says, I'm just gonna read in English. All these mismorim until the Davi Mismor are all about Yumos Mashiach. Um, which is funny because he does not say that for I mean he said that the last one was about Yumus Meshiach, also. So like I don't know why he's saying clear ailem. Maybe he's including the last one. So and when he completed this mismore, is that maybe that's mismore's the mosque? Yeah, yeah, good god, yeah, yeah. When he completed this mismore, 92, uh, because then all the world will recognize that there is no iniquity in him, he began with this mismore and said, Hashem, oh, this is a good shot now. Okay, Hashem um uh reigns, uh Hashem dawns greatness, because then the entire world will recognize that Hashem is upright and that he rules over as king over everything. Now here's the thing Veloyisgaubne Adam Lafana, Kamosh Asu Machai omos. People will not be haughty before him like the kings of the nations of the world did. So why does it have to describe Hashem as donning greatness? Because right now, human beings are donning greatness and gives a good string of Psukim here. Okay, you want all the Psukim where people call themselves gods. He compared himself. Uh uh, I will ascend onto my altar uh or onto the heights um of the cloud, I will be compared to the most high. Okay, two vampire, uh the river is mine and I made myself. Uh Vamar Mil Asher, Bokohi Adia Sisi, of Chachmassi Kinivonasi. Um, with my the hand the strength of my hand, I did it, and with my chachmah, I uh I understood. Yeah.
SPEAKER_04Is par like Jesus himself?
SPEAKER_00No. Uh good question. What his mythology was. Uh, umr Melchur, the king of Tyre, Tyr, Tyre. I never had no say it. Uh, Ilani, Umoshev Elohim, Yoshafti. I am God, and I sit on the I sat on the throne of God. I've never heard him say this before. Okay, so so all these guys make themselves into gods, and then everyone will recognize that the only one who can don the the garment of greatness is God alone, and only to him belongs kingship. As it is stated, the kingship will belong to Hashem in Ovadya. And it says on that day, Hashem will be king over all the earth. Okay, so uh, and then he will be girded with strength. So I think that's Gripshat. Is that that because our problem was Hashem has strength now, but this is just like saying, Beyomhu yi Hashem Khad Ushmochad. What do you mean? He is one and his name is one now, or Hashem Lamelk Al Khalards. So it means it'll be recognized. So people will recognize that he is uh he's the one wearing the not the pants, the uh the the the the no the the royal garments and the belt, right? Yeah, yeah, close to the pants. But okay. Um okay, and then he says, uh, and what does it mean that he established the earth there and not falter? So this is a mushroom that there will not be anyone who is margise, people who enraged the earth or cause the earth to tremble, uh, uh, which I think are the powerful kings because there will not be any more war. The opposite of this is said about the great wars that the earth crumbled. Okay, so I guess earthquaking is a mushroom for war and um and stability of earth is a mushroom for peace. Okay, so it's all metaphor. So again, very different than the Miri. And he says also the earth will shape. Okay, then he gives us another other proof. By the time of Mashiach, the earth will be stable and will not falter anymore. Okay, good. So that's so we're we're now chronologically ordering the prakim in this way that the last period was talking about the onset of Mashiach, and now this is talking about in the Messianic era. What's funny?
SPEAKER_04Yeah, stages.
SPEAKER_00I know, I know. We gotta go back and like see how this all fits in. That'll that'll be for the sunny share. Yeah, right. Yeah, yeah. Yeah, I know. We gotta we gotta put it together. We should have done it. We should have done it in the order of the safer, not in the order of cabal of shabbas. Yeah, yeah, all right, whatever. That's what we get for following the cabalists all right. Um, okay, um, so it is a good question why they do it that order, though, right? Question though. Yeah, okay. Um okay.
SPEAKER_02Yeah, it's a good question. Why would they especially give it a quarter of the who are you the thing well?
SPEAKER_00Yeah, it's it's strange, strange, yeah. Um, okay, so uh your throne will be established, uh was established from from before. Then they will recognize. Oh, sorry, this is now this is my point. Then at the time of Sheikh, they'll recognize your that your throne was always established from eternity. Okay. Umat, and you are from forever. You were from before the universe. You created the universe. So they're only recognizing now that God has always been king. Okay. Um I think I I referenced this last time, but that's like the all always was meme, you know, like yeah. Uh the meme with the astronauts pointing at the earth. Always has been, you know, but like in this case, like literally, like even before the earth. Yeah. Okay, well, I'll just show you later. Yeah. Okay. Um, the rivers raise uh Hashem. Oh Hashem, uh the rivers, again, it's all a mushroom. Rivers are mushroom for Gog and Mago, obviously. Okay, I never would have gotten that. And on the kings that are with him, with him, okay. That they will gather to wage war over you shalim. I always I thought that their war was north of Israel, but I know Urlaim gets split somehow. So I don't know my eschatology.
SPEAKER_04I think more epic that goes over.
SPEAKER_00That's true. All right. And they are compared to river, strong rivers that give uh off a sound with their motion. Uh so too they will give uh they will give forth sound and uh and a lot of clamor. Uh and it says that he can uh it says um that it compares the sound of the camp to the sound of the water, and he he gives a uh okay, he gives a uh a um rye from the Nabi, Kikol Maim Rabim, Kikol, Shakai, Balachtam, Kol Hamula, Kakol, Hamachan. Okay, find this of the war. And he also likens the king of Assyria to the river, saying, Behold, I will bring up the waters of the river that are strong in many. Okay, I don't know. I don't know these references in Yeshay. All right, and he says, These kingdoms will raise their voices and they will raise their crushingness on Israel. And the meaning of Dachyam is in Shever, so it's crushing this. Okay, so that's like war of Gogamagog. Yes, he is that's funny. Because he he's also going out of order, right? He says that there will be no more war, and now he's describing war of Gogamagog. So presumably the time when there's no more wars after this.
SPEAKER_04No more bad wars. Well, Gogamagog is a lot of people die, and if it's over your slime, then it's like me like when like that war was like exactly all the vengeance on Roscience.
SPEAKER_00I don't know my eschatology. I like I did the uh looked at this over the summer, but I forgot already.
SPEAKER_04Didn't we see that during one of the dang that like um uh like one of the things like Shirelishem uh you like you spoke people that said it? Yeah, the king referring I thought he said it's maybe that God will enact into vengeance.
SPEAKER_00Yeah, that's true. Yeah, like yeah, we we need it, we need a timeline here. Yeah, I mean I uh it's it's good questions. All right, so um Mikolas Mamra beam Amarki Yisu Kolam when they raise their voices, Yosir. So he's learning more than more than the sound of of many waters, mightier than the breakers of the sea, and more mighty than the breakers of the sea. Uh uh Hashem is mighty on high. Uh, even though they are mighty, Hashem is mighty over them and lowers them. Again, this is not talking about actual water, Hashem is mightier than the kings. Okay, that'll that'll be clear. All right, then we get to this last part. Oh, yeah, right. That's true. That's true. Yeah, yeah. That's a yeah, good call. Uh behima devarim haksubim aidini viyaka. So Edu Secha is the uh things that the is the Navuos, okay, about the Yimus Mashiach, Hami Idim al-Mahusakha that testify about your kingship. So again, this is a perfect example of the Mi'iri thing. I know the Miri wasn't talking about this, but that's my go-to example. I don't care how much philosophy you you study, you're never gonna derive Yimos Mashiach from just thinking. We only know about Yumos Mishiach because of the Navua. So so if someone said, I'm only gonna believe what my logic tells me, you would just never, you would always just deny Yimos Mashiach. In fact, you'd probably say it's never gonna happen because humanity is messed up. Um okay. Uh those navoas will be fulfilled then. A lot. Oh, so not a lot, meaning exceeding, meaning it's gonna be fulfilled so clearly that no one will deny that this is the Navuah coming true. Um Lvescha Nava, uh, so Aleph Mun Muna'as Bachataf Patah, Bashar Naha Bahem Half. Apparently, there's a mach lokus about whether there should be an a Kamat or a patach under the nun. And there's different theories about what the word means based on that. But he says it's a patach the way we have it. And says it'll be beautiful and uh and beautiful. Okay, so he's learning not nava as befitting, but beautiful. Kodish Lorchimin. Um be destroyed again. But Hashem, Lush and Kriya. Hashem is lash and kriya. That's how you get us to filah. Oh Hashem for length of days, meaning may you preserve this for length of days. Vyishlafarish nava in and tava vakeshik. Someone want to explain Nava is from the same shorts as Taiva and desire. That every person desires for your house to be kodesh, low rachim for all days. Komosh kasu, nahon yihashem Burosha Harim, Venisa Miguos, uh Vinaharu Ela Kolo Goim, Henomer Yavu Kobas or the Stakhos Lavadasham. Yeah, so let's just summarize here. So this is a much simpler thing, but is it is it more compelling? So Radak says um that this is about the time period after um uh or I guess not after, but like once Mashiach comes. I don't know how after Mashiach comes, and all wars will cease, and and everyone will recognize that Hashem is king and has always been king. Um, and we we dab in at the end for all the Navuos about this era to come true uh beyond any doubt. So now the same question is what is the relationship uh between this and uh Ms.
SPEAKER_01Moore uh Saudi Bays hard. Wasn't didn't we say something more about this, um it was like um You mean just now?
SPEAKER_04No, I guess more than it was like a Mongol war.
SPEAKER_00Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. I mean uh to me I related to those as particulars.
SPEAKER_04Okay, meaning I I know I just wanted to be Yeah, sure.
SPEAKER_00Then no, yeah, you're right, you're right. We should be responsible. Um always been king. Um Hashem will uh Hashem Hashem's um power over all the kings will be evident um from the he didn't say this directly, but like the the outcome of Milhamas Gogumagog, right? That that that's gonna end all wars. Yeah. Yeah.
SPEAKER_03I guess I have a question, general question. Like is this such a great thing to have happen for people? Like we say about like the sequence right and like a sham needed to do those miracles, yeah, but it also like took away people's pretty well to a degree to like have it so evident that Shem is in control of everything.
SPEAKER_00Right.
SPEAKER_03So it's interesting the same kind of thing, or it's it's differently like yeah, if it comes naturally that everyone comes to the recognition, so that's right. That's that's not I wouldn't say that I would say that's nothing.
SPEAKER_00It's a legitimate question. Um, and it I think the Radox uh I think the Radox holds like the Ramam that Ain Bane Olym Hazali Moshik, Alashibul Mahdios Bilvad, that's not gonna be miraculous, even right? There's just gonna be change of machus. So that seems less less uh impressive, but I was thinking about two things. I was thinking about uh America's 250th birthday coming up, and I was thinking about uh the war with Iran, okay. And you know the expression Athens and Jerusalem, like people talk about Athens and Jerusalem. So I don't know who coined the expression, but like it's a term that you hear people throw around basically that like the two pivots of like Western civilization are Jerusalem, which is the Bible, you know, Judeo-Christian values and all that stuff, and then Athens, which is Greek philosophy and the contributions of Greek thinking and science and all that stuff. So Rabbi Jonathan Sachs adds a third, what not ours, not ours, yeah. Right, Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sachs um adds a third, which is uh Gettysburg. Okay. And by Gettysburg, he he he really means America, but he he I I I know I he I know he explains it further later on, but um, but like what he means is that you had you know you had Torah introducing all these ideas into mankind, you had Greece applying the mind to the world in a way that had never been done before. But then the third step is the founding fathers of America translating a Selim Elohim-centric philosophy into a national um force, meaning enshrining the equality of human beings and making that the print the governing principle that that all human beings are subject to uh are endowed by their creator with inalienable rights and that everyone is equal under the law. And he the reason I think why he says Gettysburg is because he holds that you know that, and this is true, that like they in order to found the United States, they deferred the issue of slavery. They made that an agreement, and that came to a head in the civil war, and only you know, uh the civil war was that actually like surmounted, and obviously it's still unfolding. Um so I do think there is a level of incompleteness in the Mahus Hashem, not the objective one, but in terms of like Mahul Hashem reigning over people when in the political sphere, and that's literally what Yumos Meshiach is, is that that God is king over the laws of nature, and he demonstrated that in YTS Mitsraim, but everyone recognizing Machus Hashem in a political order is a different level. And remember, there's a Pasuk in um hold on. Okay, I can only get to this through the Haggadah. You don't know the Navi, you have to get through it through the Mishnah Torah of the Haggadah okay. So, in you know the part in the haggadah where they're talking about uh um Laelos and Yamim and uh Imosa Mashiach, the Masabrabi. Uh yeah, Ella Zabina Zaria. Yeah, right. So first Russian. Yeah. Um so there is there should be a Mafar Shan who bring down this positive in one of the Niveam.
SPEAKER_01Hold on. Uh who's gonna say it? Maybe I won't be able to find it here.
SPEAKER_00Um Brothos. I don't even remember the left on the positive, otherwise I would just search for it. No. Okay, this is not going to be. Yeah, here we go. Uh Yumiyahu 16, 14 through 15. This is about you mustem. There are days coming, says saith the Lord. When people will no longer say, you know, as Hashem lives, you know, like it says an expression of uh Shivua, that Hashem brought up Bene Israel from Erit Me Triam, K'im, rather they'll say, Ham shamah, that that the they'll refer to Hashem as the one who brought Bin Israel out of the land of the north and all the other lands that he scattered them there and who returned them to their land that he gave to their fathers, meaning that that the ingathering of exiles in the time of Mishiach will be so wondrous that people will not refer to the God who took us out of Mithraim, they'll refer to the God who took us, who gathered us in from the four corners of the earth. So there is something more astonishing about the ingathering of exiles in the time of Mashiach than even Yetis Mitzraim.
SPEAKER_04I think I'm intuitive.
SPEAKER_00Bring one people from a small number of one lane versus the at least double the number of right, but it's not about I think what impresses people about Yatis Mitzraim is the miracles, the open miracles, and there won't be open miracles here, and that's why it's uh astonishing that it'll be more wondrous, you know. Um, yeah. Um I mean, so you agree with the Navi. Yeah. It'll be easy to present if the primary will have been a long time ago. Right, right. But that doesn't mean that we will, like, for example, we're not gonna stop referring to God as the creator of the universe. That's still more impressive, you know. Um, but uh yeah, so why did what you asked a question that led us here?
SPEAKER_03With like uh is it a good thing for Hashem for us for everyone's recognizing?
SPEAKER_00Oh, right, yeah. So I was gonna say that like there will so apparently in Mizbushi Alam Shabbas, there's a recognition of the Mishpat Hashem. And this is not talking about the Mishpat, this is talking about the Mahus, right? Actually, let's start that right. Is that Saudi Saudi Bez is uh Saudi Bez is about the Mishpat Hashem, and indirectly uh about the the the mele as shofate, right? Which which the other Praakim and Kablashava deal with, okay. But Saudi Gimel is about the Malhus per se uh as uh you know uh per se is Hashem as the king, king of kings, right? Um right. So we separate the two Pragan. And also just to point out is that um we do Davin at the end of this one, but not not Saudi Bez. Still is not fully satisfying. Why has to be separate? What are you gonna say though? Um he's learning the last plastic as Edu Sakham Navakosh Hashem Lower Hamim. He's learning it as Lash and Pakasha, and we also saw that Saadi Gon learned it that way. Said you gon uh Kathek had said that Saadi Gaon translates the word um where is it? Sa'di gaon translates the Hashem at the end of the parak. Bisha Nava Nave Hakodish Hashem. Yihi is a uh have you say it? Allah Kam, I don't know, sho netas mash ella. So afkan anumavakshi mechashem, she yeah, is uh baska nave kodish lachim. It's Daven at the end, whereas we don't do that Daven at the end of uh nine two. Yeah, I say.
SPEAKER_03I mean, I don't know if it's so much in one of the same, but like if you could say the end of the parent signing basis, that's Odinum, Baseba Dishana, Rani, and you like like this will be the culmination of those who grow old and spread the wisdom and keep the uh was it the Miri they're talking about uh but keep the ideas that Hisham gave to them like alive, yeah, so they'll so through doing that, they'll bring about those bad.
SPEAKER_00That is true. I mean, yeah, that fits in actually better with the Miries one talking about the Khacham in the basement. But yeah, that is true. Yeah, all right. Well, I mean, Sarak Yoon, we at least we have several viable approaches, it just hasn't landed yet. It's not I don't see the necessity of this. Honestly, I think what I am gonna I I'm not gonna say sadly, but like it's gonna take a lot of work. I think I did do need to give a Sunday shear on this where I go back and look at the entire everything we've done all year and like see what the sequence is.
SPEAKER_04And what was that? And like the ones we didn't do.
SPEAKER_00Yeah, so I think actually we we should plan to do those. So which how many have we not done? We have not done 94, and then is that the only one? 94. Yeah, just 94, right? Yeah, oh yeah, 90 and 91.
unknown90, 91.
SPEAKER_00Yeah, I mean, it depends on on if you say that that's part of the set, right? Because if we're talking about the Moshe being a set, and 90 is one of my favorite ones that I also did my first year teaching in Yeshiva, but we haven't come back to yet. So I would this be part of the Moshe. No, no, no, this is part of the Moshe, but is this about the Mashiach one? Yeah, like the Moshiach set. Yeah, yeah. All right, so let's let's make a tentative plan, not maybe not the beginning of next year, because next year the beginning is going to be very close to uh around the Yom Norayam. So I I would probably want to do Yom Noraim stuff for the first couple of actually, I don't even know what days. Oh, it's falling out on the weekends, so we we'll probably have shear or whatever. We'll but let's plan to to early in the year do 90, 91, and 94. And then at that time, maybe I'll feed all of the transcripts of from software AI of all of our shear and tilum into Claude and like just get reminders of what each of those about, and then we could like maybe work on it.
SPEAKER_04Is Silver AI getting better?
SPEAKER_00Yeah, it is getting better, yeah.
SPEAKER_04Yeah, just triggering or do you not even do that?
SPEAKER_00You sample it. Yeah. Oh.
SPEAKER_02Oh, I think it might be the file size is too big, though.
SPEAKER_00Interesting, yeah.
SPEAKER_05Uh