.png){kind=logo}
Dispatch Ajax! Podcast
A Geek Culture Podcast - Two life-long Nerds explain, critique and poke fun at the major pillars of Geek Culture for your listening pleasure.
Dispatch Ajax! Podcast
The Law of One: Ra Dogging Love And Light
In a new miniseries all about the weird and/or esoteric we pull the thread back to The Law of One, a 1980s series of channeling sessions where researcher Don Elkins and collaborator Jim McCarty recorded Carla Ruckert in trance, speaking as an entity called Ra. From “intelligent infinity” to densities of consciousness and a sweeping claim that all is one, the material wrapped metaphysics in sci‑fi gloss and birthed phrases that still ripple through New Age culture, wellness spaces, and social media.
We unpack how that language works: grand, elastic, and impossible to falsify. Ambiguity becomes power, letting seekers project their needs onto a system that can’t be disproved and seldom has to be precise. That’s a feature, not a bug—and it explains why “love and light” turned into a template anyone can remix into starseeds, vibrations, and cosmic downloads. Along the way, we examine the pattern that keeps repeating: disillusionment with institutions, the rise of alternative spiritual paths, and the backlash that follows. When meaning feels scarce, a generous cosmology feels like relief.<br><br>But we also draw a line. The ancient aliens pipeline often bundled with this rhetoric can erase the achievements of ancient, non‑Western cultures by crediting outsiders for pyramids, astronomy, and engineering. We argue for awe without erasure—honoring human ingenuity while keeping a clear eye on how vague metaphysics enables grift and cultish control. Curiosity, compassion, and skepticism can coexist. If all is one, accountability belongs in the circle too.
Stick around for a tease of what this rabbit hole led us to next, including Sunbow True Brother and other wild side paths. If this exploration challenged or delighted you, tap follow, share it with a friend, and drop a review on Apple Podcasts—your words help more curious minds find the show.
The future as you measure in time space the communications which we offer through this instrument. We communicate now.
SPEAKER_00:Gentlemen, let's broaden our minds.
SPEAKER_03:Are they in the proper approach pattern for today?
SPEAKER_02:Negative. Oh the weapon. Charge the lightning field.
SPEAKER_01:Welcome back to Dispatch Ajax. I'm Skip. I am doing no. No, I'm Jay. How about that? You are. You are. Yeah. Oh no. I I kind of wanted to say something about how you're slowly getting dressed as we do this, but uh nobody needs to know any of that. Does it sound different once I put on clothes? Is it sultry? Oh god, no. No, it's the opposite of that. Isn't this another ASMR episode? Oh god. We need all of them. So today is gonna be I think this is gonna be a fun rabbit hole episode. Remember our Mandela Effect episode? You know, in fact, sir, I do remember our Mandela Effect episode. I will never forget it, mostly because when we recorded it, it was so insane and such a rabbit hole that our recording was literally three and a half hours that I managed to pair down to an hour and a half, which even then seemed excessive. This is, I think, a topic on that level. I don't think it's going to be that massive, but but who's to say? And people will probably remember it differently in the future. I'm going to start with a quote. And see if this seems familiar to you in any way, shape, or form. Me or the gentle listener? Yes. Our galaxy was created by a single logos, and our sun is a sub-logos of that logos. A sublogos individualizes or differentiates the natural laws set up by its logos. It also refines the cosmic mind into its specific archetypal mind, informed by the experience of earlier sub-logoi. I had sub-logoi once. I had to get some cream for it. You have to take these big pills. They're horse pills, man. Usually, if you just get some citrus in your diet, it's fine. My neighbor kept saying just use avramechnon. But I was like, no. You know what? Now you're actually way closer to the topic than uh than we were before. We're not the type of people who cynically condemn or judge systems of belief wholesale. We don't. No, no, no, would never do that. We uh do couldn't, wouldn't, haven't, shouldn't. I said wholesale. You know, as long as your religion isn't used as a means of like oppression or abuse or exploitation, yeah, it can be beneficial to certain swaths of society. That's fine.
unknown:Oh.
SPEAKER_01:That having been said, there is a phenomenon post-the Enlightenment of moving away from or finding alternatives to the main institutions of organized religion. Be that movements like deism in the 18th century, spiritualism in the 19th and early 20th centuries, the rise of Hinduism-inspired cults in the second half of the 20th century. It happens and it is cyclical. And in the modern world, those cycles are much more rapid or ongoing. And since the beginning of the 20th century, especially, those ideas have been increasingly esoteric and inspired by more and more international schools of thought. But even those that crop up today, be it QAnon or Zizzium, is it Ziziism or is it Zizism? Zizi Uh Steve Steve Zisu? Is that what you're trying to say? Mm-hmm. Yep, it's Steve Zanzism. They aren't really wholly original, and they do all share similar elements. One of the inevitable elements of these cycles is, of course, backlash by mainstream society. In example, the Jesus movement of the 70s, the Titanic Panic, Evangelicalism of the Ots, whatever the hell's going on right now. They're all part of the same system of rinse and repeat. Case in point, QAnon is a manifestation of backlash and also one of these examples. But in all of those cases, one of the unifying concepts is that we somehow, as a species, have gotten off course spiritually, and we have to get back to connecting to society at large and what is seen as God or a creator. So today I wanted to talk about one that I discovered only recently: the curious case of the law of one. Are you familiar with this at all? Law of One. Uh is that a uh Sylvester Stallone Judge Tred reference? That he is, in fact, the law? He is the law of one. This is all about Stallonism. We are all Stallonites. I am a Stalloneite.
SPEAKER_00:All praise the Stallone. Stallone laughs at your God.
SPEAKER_01:The glass table and praise. One of its disciples is Vince McMahon. Oh god. No, that's a pantheon. We can totally. I read a really bad story recently that just came out about him and one of the former wrestlers he had that committed suicide. Good. After they allowed her rape at a military base, that's an old story. But then he also. Yeah. Yeah. Anyway. That really helped the mood. So the Sorry. Cut it out. Cut it out. Oh boy. So the Law of One is a system of belief that stemmed from ufologist, pilot, engineer, physicist, bon vivant, Don Elkins, and his colleague Jim McCarthy, who together interviewed a woman named Carla Rukert. Now Rukert claimed to be a medium, and in the nearly in the early 1980s, they engaged in a series of sessions where Rukert acted as a channel. This comes up a lot. A channel for an entity known as Ra. Yes, that Ra, the Ra you're all thinking of, from Stargate. Which they believed was a collective consciousness or an advanced extraterrestrial intelligence. Which off the bat should sort of be a red flag, right? What do you mean? Flares go up. They sought to understand and communicate insights about the unity of all life, the evolution of the soul, the interconnectedness of all things, as Douglas Adams would say. They recorded all these sessions, and they delved into topics such as, well, pretty much all just metaphysics. They claimed that they talk about philosophy, psychology, and mystical aspects of the human experience, but I mean you could just say metaphysics and we kind of get it. The resulting material was then published as a series of books that have attracted a loyal following, as they put it, of those interested in spiritual teachings and esoteric knowledge. This work emphasizes the themes of, and here's the most important part, love, light, and the importance of personal growth and understanding the context of a larger cosmic framework. Now, love and light are the most important words in this entire thing. Because these people created, coined the phrase love and light as a spiritual top. So, research of love and light, just Google love and light research. These guys created it. These publications, in reality, were really just a collection of double speak, misused or misunderstood terminology and rhetorical nonsense. But because of its vagueness and its ambiguity, it's since allowed wide swaths of people to apply their own sensibilities and interpretations on top of it. We'll come back to that later. First of all, Doug T. Elkins, engineer, pilot, and paranormal researcher, and this comes from I think his personal obituary, was born and raised in Louis, Louisville, Kentucky. I think they call it Louisville. He grew up in a family of Christian scientists.
SPEAKER_00:Yeah, exactly.
SPEAKER_01:Jesus was first and foremost a scientist. And an alien. Apparently. He departed from his youth. Jesus Christ. I guess that would just be getting older. Uh no. He departed from his youth. I meant to say like a like a rocket into space. Elkins departed from his faith as a youth, and eventually he served in the Korean War, after which he completed his education at the University of Louisville. He earned three degrees in engineering. He completed his last one in 1960. He then took a job at the University of Alaska. Interesting, we talked about that earlier, and created the mechanical engineering program at that school. In 1961, he accepted a position at his alma mater, back in the continental US. He'd become interested in the paranormal in the mid-1950s. Basically coming off of the UFO Craze, Roswell, and what have you. In 1962, he called together a group to practice meditation in an attempt to contact extraterrestrials. Because he was gifted a book that depicted UFO contactees in Detroit who claimed to have a psychic tie to their alien abductors. This part is actually, I think, on his website. The experiment proved successful. And in 1963, he published an initial report, telepathy data collected by extraterrestrial communication. It's required reading in most schools now. In 1965, he left. Soon to be. Well, yeah, now it's going to be, I'm sure. In 1965, he left the university for a higher paying job as a pilot, because, you know, back when airlines made money, apparently. During this time, though, he formed a group that would stay together for quite a while. One of the people that he managed to recruit was a woman named Carla Ruckert. Following her divorce in 1968, they became close friends and he began to work with her as sometimes described as medium, sometimes described as channel, and she became one of his top bitches. Technical terms. Yeah, that's medical. So in 1970, they founded L Research, Love Light Research, to provide structure for this project. And so through the 1970s, Elkins developed a cadre of what he called channels, or can be described as mediums. The first of which resulted in a book co-authored with Ruckert called Secrets of the UFO. Ooh, I'm intrigued. I want to know the secrets of the UFO. Tell me the secrets of the UFO. Why have we not heard of these before? In 1980, Elkins invited a member of his original group, James McCarthy. I think it's actually McCarthy. I think it's James McCarthy. To work with him exclusively with Rukirk. As a result, was one of the craziest paranormal sessions, let's say, of all time. This is right up there with Rendelsham in its scope. Rukert claimed to experience an intensive period of channeling an extraterrestrial being calling himself Ra. He claimed to have come to Earth centuries ago and to have introduced monotheism to Egypt and to have built the pyramids. Okay, a bunch of flares going off now. Yep. Okay. Alright. This also comes from Elkin's website. He taught that the basic truth was that in capital letters, all are one. This material was gathered together and published over the next few years as The Law of One. Cool. Love Light Research is jargon they helped coin. You'll see this in almost all new age spiritualism today. So much so, even in fucking Instagram moms are talking about love and light. It's so cliche and so overused, even from 1970 when they coined it, even the creators of it kind of commented it on it later. It basically includes focusing the mind to channel chakras and focus and we're all love and God is everything. We've all heard it before. Yeah, I call it the way. That's how I found my spiritual truth. This is the way. It's very clearly replicatable. It's almost like a Mad Libs template for every spiritual leader that comes after this. To the extent where Don Elkins actually mentions this in one of the sessions about how generic and absurdly obvious these things were that she was channeling. He actually goes on to question why is this so ambiguous? At one point, he basically just goes, Can we not do that because we're wasting our time here? Even though he believed it was happening, which is embarrassing. If you want, I can send you a link to some of the audio because these were all recorded. Basically, here's how it works. So Ruckert would go into a trance state and channel raw. And I'm gonna pause right here so that I want you to understand how serious this is. This work, The Law of One, is also referred to by them as the Raw materials. Wait, are we Raw Dogging this episode? The Raw Dog materials. You know, ODB used to say, Ooh, baby, I like it raw. That must have been what he was talking about. I'm pretty sure he was channeling Raw. He was really into the sixth density social memory complex that originated from Venus. See, that's where we're getting at here. This is where it gets complicated because we don't want to be complete cynics and we don't want to be, we don't want to seem as we're just making fun of of certain things. But no, we're having fun. We're having fun, that's for sure. It this comes down to sort of like the fundamental idea that this kind of thing it uses such double talk and such generic and ambiguous language that you could pretty much just put whatever you want on top of it and then think you're doing something profound. Which I guess is all of human history, but this is the onset of the modern version of this. This is post-Blavatsky and post-that whole vrill, this is the modern genesis of this kind of spiritualism. Just naturally lends itself to grifters and con artists and cult leaders. Well, I mean, this thing behind all new religious movements is that people are searching for meaning, they're searching for hope, they're searching for enlightenment. And if they haven't found it, a new path opening up that seems new and fresh and different and exciting. It's understandable that anybody would take that path. The people who do this, they're not necessarily, you know, I mean, well, I'm sure we'll get into it, but not every QAnon person is an idiot or a mark. There's a lot of people just get misguided. They're searching for meaning and reason to their life, and they found answers, or at least someone purporting to have the answers, you know, that may not have their best interest or the interest of society as a whole there for them. Right. That's why I was saying it's cyclical. I mean, like whether it's Mormonism or spiritualism or other offshoots of major religions or backlashes to major religions. I mean, think about all the that cult in organ that essentially started with a yoga instructor who became a psychotic dictator. And since the Enlightenment, essentially, and obviously before it could, but that's a that's kind of a different topic. There have been backlashes to discontent with mainstream doctrine of institutionalized religion. And so inevitably these kinds of things happen. And along with those offshoots, like what was it? Um in the in the 70s, you had the Hare Krishna's. I mean, white people joining Hare Krishna groups or certain hippie communes that profess Hindu doctrine or whatever. I mean, it's cyclical, it's always happened. A part of that is also the more modern we get, the more we move away from not necessarily getting secular, but being more granular with how we understand the way the universe actually works scientifically, the more we look for different explanation. And instead of just being like, Oh, moon's too big, I gotta kill this chick in town because she's a witch. We go, Oh, well now I know how the moon works. So I need to kill the chicken town because she's a witch. But I do know about the moon. But I know how the moon works now. So they look for more grandiose, but also more at the same time, both generic and specific explanations. Like they pick and choose from different cultures, but they still want more so overarchingly vague answers to these things that we get stuff like this. Here's uh one of my favorite excerpts of this. This is kind of how these conversations went in these sessions from the questioner.
SPEAKER_02:Understand that the first distortion, intelligent infant, distortion of what we call free will. Can you give me a definition of this distortion?
SPEAKER_03:I am wrought in this distortion of the law of want. It is recognized that the creator will know itself.
SPEAKER_02:And am I correct in assuming that the creator will know itself? Creator and grants for this knowing the concept of freedom, total freedom of choice, in the the ways of knowing. Am I correct?
SPEAKER_03:I am wrong. This is quite correct.
SPEAKER_01:I mean, maybe six-dimensional creator entities might speak this way. Um who else would Zool? I think Zool. At least I got the gist of what Zool was saying, and Zool didn't have to say I am Zool every time. Like it's Simon says. I will continue. Questioner.
SPEAKER_02:Just then being the first distortion of the law of one, which I assume means the law of intelligent similar.
SPEAKER_01:I'm assuming that too. We're all thinking that. But who would? I mean, we're all on the same page here. Intelligent infinity, that's obviously that's my license plate, okay.
SPEAKER_00:No, your license plate's actually much strangely more confusing if you even don't know what it means.
SPEAKER_02:This then being the first distortion of the law of one, which I assuming is the law of intelligent infinity, from all other distortions, which aren't the total experience of the creation, spring from this. Is this correct?
SPEAKER_03:What? I am wrong. This is both correct and incorrect in your illusion all experience springs from the law of free will or the way of confusion in another sense which we are learning. The experiences are this distortion.
SPEAKER_01:Fuck off, Ross.
SPEAKER_00:The Raw is that! The Raw in Stargate made way more sense.
SPEAKER_01:Okay, this I like this part too. Um we're gonna do with this the whole time, but this is funny. Although we could. That could be a whole podcast of itself. We could do a live thing about that, that'd be really funny.
SPEAKER_02:We'll have to think about that and ask questions on it in the next session while we'll go on to what you have given me is the second distortion, which is distortion of love. Is this correct?
SPEAKER_03:Where did that come from? I am raw. This is correct.
SPEAKER_01:Cool. Thanks, great. Nailed it. Really helping me in my life. This is enlightenment. It's all explained now. This is enlightenment. This is the truth in the way. The love and the light. This is what raw dogging love and life is all about.
SPEAKER_00:Raw dogging love and life. That's the name of the episode.
SPEAKER_01:This influences so many people today. Very serious people. What was that woman who like died in Hawaii? They'd wrapped her in Christmas lights. Amy Carlson? Yeah. Mother God. That's this. It's still going on. Yep. It always will be. Apparently. Until Raw finally decides to come through the Stargate. Yeah. Once he pops out, and I was like, hey, yo, obviously you guys know what Love and Lights about. You know that whole free will thing. We talked about it earlier, you know. Hey, I'm Raw. Did you see the Raw thing? Let me tell you the raw truth. Until that happens, someone's gonna be trying to figure things out, and that's where we get this stuff. Even from their own website. They try to give you these overarching synopses of point by point, and even in those, they contradict themselves. If you go and you actually listen to the or read the transcripts from the actual sessions. The Law of One states that there is only one, and that one is the infinite creator, which Ra also calls the infinite intelligence or intelligent infinity. Okay. Since all is one, all manifestations or appearances of manyness is an illusion. According to Ra, it is an illusion carefully engineered in order to give the creator the opportunity to know itself. Okay, so this is where you think you get into like, I don't know, original sin or something, right? On their website, it says in Ra's terms, distortion is anything that moves away from undistorted unity. Defining yourself by saying you're not the opposite of yourself is really helpful. You're Jake because you're not not Jake. Hey, stop you pretending to lie. You're you're you're Jake because you're not anti-Jake. Stepping back a second, by imposing these at odds logical distinctions and rhetorical conundrums, it imposes this pseudo-esoteric mysticism and ineffability to these things. You can't really ever grasp it because you can't explain it. So it's always mysterious and thus has power. And you can't disprove it either. No, because it's not saying anything, it's all just mumbo jumbo. Yeah. So you're just running around in circles. And anybody who tries to like come at that, well, they'll just point to that. And then if you try to explain, like, well, that doesn't make sense, or like, well, you're just not understanding. Right, exactly. It innately doesn't make sense. And then the more you look into it, the less it makes sense. Okay, so free will, the first distortion. The first distortion is free will or affinity, or the limit of viewpoint. Or the concept of free will is a distortion of the way things are. Right, which can be taken so many ways. It's a malleability of motive. Absolutely. You can use it however you like. It says here, even in this, with the first distortion, the created universe that we experience is the creator's exploration of itself through the first distortion, which Ra also calls the law of confusion. Ra defines free will as the recognition that the creator will know itself. You can take that in a lot of ways. It's a little different. The way that they describe free will.
SPEAKER_03:I am wrong. This is quite correct.
SPEAKER_01:That's not exactly what they said in the summation, though. I mean, I do find their ability to interpret the universe in a new way fascinating, but I will give it that. This is a good one.
SPEAKER_02:Is there a manifestation of love that we could call vibration?
SPEAKER_01:That is science. I just love how all of these questions they have an underlying thesis behind them that is coming completely out of the field. Yeah. I know. Well, we all know that 5G gives cancer to cats. I mean, yes, we do know that. Uh I am raw. Yes, that is correct. And so from there, we can now build our logical arguments. That's what this is, right? Yeah. And then, of course, the response, this is one of the longer responses by Ra.
SPEAKER_03:I am raw. Again, we reach semantic difficulties.
SPEAKER_01:You know what? He's not wrong there.
SPEAKER_03:The vibration or density of love or understanding is not a term used in the same sense as the second distortion love. The distortion love being the great activity and final co create of various creations using intelligent infinity the vibration love a being of that density in which those who have learned to do an activity called a loving without significant distortion, then seek the ways of light or wisdom. Thus in a vibratory sense. Thus vibratory complexes recapitulate in reverse of the creation in its unity. Thus a showing of the rhythm or flow of the great heartbeat if you will use this analogy.
SPEAKER_01:Shout out to the movie Rhythm and Flow. What are we supposed to make of the rhythm of the night then? If there's no light. How does this religious movement not do rhythm of the light? How is it not the law of one in the Miami sound machine? Also, do we think that Groot is just like he's still contemplating how to tell them about their original sin? That's like, I am Groot. Your idea about vibrational love is wrong. And that's a real ancient aliens theory there. Yeah. Yeah, you could say this is kooky and woo-woo, and that's fine. I am raw. That is correct. This is correct. I'm sure you've gone through some of these. They are quite entertaining. The woman that's channeling this is eventually just like, I'm tired. Let's do this later. I love that. I love that. Uh no, I know we're like breaking down the laws of the universe and what it means to be human and both an infinite soul wandering upon the light and love of the intergalactic unity that we all are. But I'm really hungry, so I think we're gonna take a break.
SPEAKER_03:This instrument is growing low in vital energy, green ray energy, and partially open other self to blue ray interaction. May we ask if you have any queries. Before we close.
SPEAKER_00:So the next response is the only thing I need to know is is there anything we can do to make the instrument more comfortable or help her?
SPEAKER_03:I am wrong. This instrument is slightly uncomfortable. Okay.
SPEAKER_01:Wait, what? Hold on. Wait, oh what? That's supposed to be like a salutation? I don't know what that is. A-D-O-N-A-I? I guess that's supposed to be a salutation. What you say? A-D-O-N-A-I? Yeah. Yeah. What the word? And it refers exclusively to God, the singular form of Adonai, the Hebrew term meaning my lord or my master. Originally historically used to refer to human superior, a king, a husband, or man in position of authority. Okay. So he was saying raw out and dropped the mic. Yeah. I am raw. This vessel needs at least a couple hundred dollars, uh, maybe twenty minutes of oral satisfaction and a light nap. Do you have any change? I am raw. Can you put the game on, please? I am raw. My car broke down, and I need to get back home to my kids. I'm hangry. Please leave me alone. Oh, bra. And I don't mean to be cynical, but the best. Part about this is like I'm literally reading this from their website. You can look this up. They give you free links to their audio, to their transcripts of these sessions, which number 106, by the way. That's a that's a lot of truth. The first round, there is later a movement called Re-Listening, where they will revisit this and do an extra 60 plus. Oh shit. That's smart. Yeah, yep. That's smart. That's the New Testament. Yeah. Take that old shit, flip it, reverse it, make the new shit, and then spit on it. Remix that shit. That's your third one. Get somebody to cover that shit. That's four. And then you have a reboot. That's five right there. And then a few years later, you have a requel. Yeah. Do a prequel of that reboot. Then you have a multiverse where it's the two interacting. Oh no. So I'm on the website right now, right? And they have all these links in in various languages. And then there's an ad at the bottom. And this is not generated by them. This is an actual ad put in by you know one of those firms that does this. Put in by Ra himself. What starseed are you? Ooh, which one? Oh man, there's so many to choose from, though. And it asks, are you a Palladian? A gray brackets Zeta reticuli? A light worker? Or a Syrian? No, not a Syrian. Syrian. Yeah, yeah. I mean, I've always thought of myself more as an Arcturian. Hmm. You know, with Arcturians, maybe it doesn't matter, you know. I've always considered myself from the 12th planet. Leboo-Boo. No, canonically it's now La Boo-Boo. Okay. Sure is. Yeah. Yeah. That's what we needed. That's the good stuff right there.
SPEAKER_02:Mm-hmm.
SPEAKER_01:People tying this into the Anunnaki, coming up with different weird interpretations of it, you know, of on their own, because it's so generic in its like double speak and its ambiguity that they could just kind of throw whatever jargon or what have you on top of it and make it mean whatever they want. And you know what? And for some people, maybe that helps. Sure. But when you get into the ancient alien stuff, as we were talking, a lot of it is is literally just white colonial discreditation of ancient cultures and othering of non-white, non-European societies, their ability to possibly engineer something or build something and not be white. I would say there is a strong Western paradigm that is applied to a lot of these things when they don't quite understand. And some of this comes from that. But I do think what you're saying is like at the through line for a lot of people who get into this line of thinking. And as you were saying, there are accounts of things like the chariots of the gods type stuff, the wheels, the you know, all sorts of alien, you know, not a uh maybe accounts you could say in ancient history, but you know, the premise, the underlying premise of most of of this type of line of thinking is essentially othering aliens. Wait, we you can't other aliens, man. This is the uh the the infinite all of us, what whatever it was, the the what was it, the the infinite intelligence? Yeah, yeah. Well, on this density. I mean, it all depends, you know, which layer of the jello you're really functioning on. I mean, it's part of the 75,000-year cycle. That's a long cycle. I didn't want to even get into that because the the lore in this is long. It's really long. There's 106 of these in the first. You can look into that if you want to. Do your own search. I didn't want to get too far into it, but this is interesting because it is a fundamental, I think, part of the modern new age spiritual movement. And if you've ever heard anyone talk about light beings or moving toward light, or like being a bringer of light, or being, you know, like a or white light, star children, or anything in that vein. Anything you heard at Burning Man, these guys coined light love research. And this is kind of the fundamental baseline. You said you were going down this particular light and love rabbit hole, and it it led you to some other places, is that right? Something that a little teaser for what will come next. Oh, indeed it did. In fact, there were a lot of things that falling down this rabbit hole, I hit my head on, and we will discuss several of those coming up soon. Give us little little tastes on the menu. Well, this will be literally what it is, but I encourage all of you to look up a guy, a friend, dear friend, friend of the show. Uh, let's not go that far. Sunbow True Brother. And if you've ever met him at a rainbow gathering. A squatch sighting, maybe. If you've ever gone squatching, you might have met our good friend Sunbow True Brother. It's just a tease. There's more involved, and we will get to that soon. Indeed, we will, gentle listener. But until that time, we hope that you've enjoyed the journey with us so far. I am raw. And if you wouldn't mind liking, share, and subscribing. We just start on every statement that way. I am raw. Please leave us five lights and loves. On the podcast app of your choice, ideally Apple Podcasts. It's the best way for getting heard and seen. I am Raw. Don't do check us out on YouTube. Uh, we are there. We'll have social media sometime, you know. I am Raw. Uh, but until we do, also if you we are if you know that any people that might uh, you know, friends, loved ones, retirees, veterans, veterinarians, anybody who might be interested in uh what we do, what we talk about, hey, uh pass along, you know, because uh I am raw, and we we just want to like share what what we're doing, and you know, one last thing I'd like to say that I am raw, and we are happy that you have been listening with us, and we hope you've enjoyed everything and skip until next time. I am raw. What should they do? Well, first and foremost, I am raw, and we are all part of the whole, the infinite intelligence, the one, the whole being of creation. Reject distortions and the idea of manyness, and please support your local comic shops and retailers because they are part of the whole and the one. And they are raw. And from Dispatch Ajax, who is raw, we would like to say, Godspeed, fair wizards. I am raw.
SPEAKER_03:Please go away.