Episode 130: 18:53 Working Tools Series - American Civic Life

Throughout history, Masonic publications and early newspaper accounts have reflected a lasting public curiosity about the relationship between Freemasonry and government.

In this episode, we explore the research of Masonic historian Chris Ruli, whose work invites us to reconsider the stories, assumptions, and myths that surround the Craft’s role in American history. As we approach the semiquincentennial year, there’s an opportunity to examine both the criticisms and the praise often associated with Freemasonry — and to consider whether the full impact of its tradition of public service has yet to be fully understood.

Chris Ruli serves as the Assistant Grand Historian of the Supreme Council, 33°, A.A.S.R., Southern Jurisdiction. Check out his latest essay in the June 2026 edition of "Fraternal Review" at www.theresearchlodge.com

Transcript

0:00

In July 2026, the United States will celebrate the 250th anniversary of its independence. Among the most persistently discussed and frequently misunderstood topics is the Masonic fraternity's involvement in revolution and the subsequent attempts to form the government that we see today. hundreds, perhaps thousands of works have been written about the subject, and often focus on the notable Freemasons who participated in the private meetings, debates, and battles that shaped our country Cumulatively, however we discover that we know relatively little from a Masonic perspective about the craft's role in revolution. Surviving lodge records from the colonial period are few and far between, often limited to attendance lists and brief notations of actions taken. ironically, this information gap exists even today, as relatively little research has been produced that focuses on the two centuries worth of material that exists in congressional records and ancillary reports. This information gap has major consequences for fraternal research. It has allowed both the fraternity's admirers and its critics to project meaning onto a silence, filling it with romantic narratives of Masonic architects of liberty or conversely, dark conspiracies of secret influence. Neither version holds up under scrutiny Masonic periodicals and notices in early newspapers suggest a long public fascination with the idea of Masonic involvement in government. Masonic The fraternity itself fed this perception, sometimes deliberately, with Masonic publications that highlighted biographies of notable members or reproductions of public events. Masons laid the cornerstones of the White House in 1792 and the United States Capitol in 1793 with elaborate public ceremonies. George Washington himself participated in the Capitol ceremony, wearing his Masonic regalia and consecrating the stone with corn, wine, and oil before a large crowd of spectators. these grand public gestures, parades down Pennsylvania Avenue, funeral processions through the district's streets, and lavish balls attended by presidents and legislators cemented the fraternity's visibility in the national consciousness. Yet its local presence within the community grounded itself as a local organization that opened its doors to any interested man. Setting aside some notable exceptions, see Prince Hall. at times this visibility made Freemasonry enormously popular. At others, it provoked a fierce backlash. anti-Masonic sentiment coalesced into the Anti-Masonic Party, which sent 44 representatives to Congress between 1828 and 1841. Former President John Quincy Adams returned to the House under the anti-Masonic banner, and Millard Fillmore launched his congressional career within its ranks before transitioning to the Whigs. The movement eventually faded, but its echo, the tension between public admiration and public suspicion of Freemasonry, has persisted in American culture ever since This record of public engagement challenges the popular characterization of Freemasonry as a secret society. The fraternity has long published detailed proceedings of its meetings, printed notices in newspapers, performed rituals at public events, and operated institutions open to the wider community. Lodges published rosters of their officers, announced their meetings, and reported on events with a regularity that would be unusual for any genuinely clandestine organization Freemasonry is better understood as a society with private rituals, much like other fraternal, religious, and civic organizations in the United States, rather than a secret society in any meaningful sense of that term. Its existence in public life has been constant and well-documented When this lens is applied specifically to Congress, the results are striking. Research for the author's forthcoming book, Congress and the Freemasons, identified over two thousand four hundred fifty individuals associated with Freemasonry who served in Congress between 1775 and 2026. But the numbers alone tell only part of the story. Masons who entered state and national politics frequently found ways to bring the fraternity into civic life congressional Masons often accepted invitations to participate in cornerstone ceremonies and other public events and entered Masonic-themed speeches, resolutions, and memoranda into the Congressional Record. Congress itself recognized the fraternity as a beneficial society, issuing charters for Masonic incorporations, granting lodges permission to purchase federally owned land for temple construction, loaning government equipment, including tents, flags, even artillery for Masonic conventions, and authorizing the return of historic lodge minute books that had ended up in the Library of Congress. Masonic charities, particularly those of the Shriners, contributed millions to public health through hospitals and research funding. Grand Lodges established orphanages, homes for the elderly, and employment bureaus, especially following the Civil War, to provide a community safety net well before the advent of federal social programs these activities were not conducted behind closed doors. They were public, documented, and widely reported in newspapers that, by the turn of the 20th century, dedicated full pages to fraternal events in communities across the country In 1826, Congressman Sam Houston, a Freemason, argued that the House should adjourn for Washington's birthday so that the Masonic fraternity could use the chamber for a commemorative celebration. The request prompted a spirited floor debate about whether Masonic activities could disgrace the hall. Benjamin B. French, a House clerk who rose to become the Grand Master of the District of Columbia, organized the cornerstone ceremonies for the Washington Monument, the Smithsonian Institution, and the Capitol Extension, and later planned Abraham Lincoln's funeral as Commissioner of Public Buildings the catafalque his son built to hold Lincoln's casket was later used for Presidents Garfield, McKinley, Harding, and Taft, all of them Freemasons The fraternity's engagement with Congress was never static. Before the turn of the 20th century, Masons primarily sought congressional assistance to charter Masonic incorporations and secure legislative benefits. Between the 1910s and 1930s, national Masonic organizations, particularly the Scottish Rite Southern Jurisdiction under Grand Commander John H. Cowles, took an active role in lobbying for causes like the creation of a Department of Education and the defense of Masons persecuted under European fascism. From the 1940s through the 1990s, the fraternity marketed itself as a patriotic and charitable counterbalance to communism. Prince Hall Grand Lodges urged Congress to pass anti-lynching legislation in the 1920s and reaffirmed their support for the government against communist infiltration in the 1950s By the 1990s, the fraternity's congressional engagement had shifted towards commemoration, recognizing lodge anniversaries, honoring prominent members, and reflecting on the fraternity's historical contributions rather than lobbying for new legislative actions As we enter this semi-quincentennial year, the opportunity exists to address our popular Masonic myths, both hostile and flattering. and acknowledge that we may not necessarily know the full extent of the craft's legacy of public service to America. More needs to be written and examined, and at times, uncomfortable truths may need to be presented and considered in order for us to seek better understanding. The Masonic through line is neither secrecy nor conspiracy, but sustained visible participation in American civic life. Participation that deserves the same critical attention historians apply to any other institution that has operated alongside democratic government for this long