Presentation and introduction 0:00
Before entering the topic of climate change, I proceed with a short report on covid-19.
A few days ago, the sugeon general of the State of Florida, Dr. Joseph Ladapo, recommended not applying mRNA vaccines against COVID-19 to men between 18 and 39 years of age. This was based on studies conducted, using the most accepted methodology to determine the efficacy of vaccines, determined that there is an 84% increase in the relative incidence of heart-related death in this sex and age group.
The same entity had already recommended against inoculation in healthy children and adolescents aged 5 to 17 years and against COVID-19 inoculation among infants and children under 5 years of age.
As director general of health of Panama on 2 occasions I know the responsibility with the health of this entity and the seriousness with which health decisions are approached, starting with the fact that these are supported by high-quality scientific teams.
Added to this recommendation is the announcement by the Danish health authority that it no longer offers vaccination to those under 50 years of age. This had already indicated that those under 18 years of age would no longer be invited to be vaccinated because this group "very rarely gets seriously ill from this disease."
About two weeks ago, Norway stopped giving boosters to its entire population under 65, and Australia has done the same for everyone under 50.
At this point, with all the evidence that has been provided by famous scientists and endorsed by prestigious health institutions, it becomes, for health providers, not only irresponsible, but also immoral and criminal to insist on inoculating the population, especially children.
Now let's get on with the climate change fraud.
Hello, welcome to the 39th episode of our GREATEST SCIENTIFIC FRAUD podcast, and the eleventh episode of our second season. I am your host, Dr. Esteban Morales van Kwartel.
In the previous 3 episodes, I explained the findings presented by scientists who question the paradigm of global warming caused by human beings. In this episode I am going to explain in a simple way the findings of another remarkable scientist, who was one of the most prestigious climatologists in the United States, Dr. Patrick Michaels who also analyzed the IPCC paradigm.
His death just 3 months ago saddens me considerably because he was one of the most influential in my deepening on the subject of global warming and also greatly inspired the writing of my book, "The two great scientific frauds of the 20th and 2Ith centuries".
Climate change is natural 3:50
Let us remember once again that IPCC, which stands for INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE, is the organization sponsored by the United Nations to promote the supposed "paradigm of the increase in global temperature caused by emissions of greenhouse gases, produced by the human being".
Well, Dr. Michaels, like many others, has presented evidence that calls into question ALL components of the aforementioned paradigm. But in this episode I am going to refer only to the magnitude of the warming. In this regard, Dr. Michaels presented evidence that greenhouse gas-related warming is clearly below the average of IPCC climate forecasts.
Incidentally, one of the frequent lies of proponents of the paradigm is that those of us who question it deny climate change and global warming. Could not be farther from the truth. Climate change is nothing new; it is a natural component of the climate. This constantly changes, presenting variable periods of heating and cooling.
Douglas Pollock, an industrial civil engineer from the University of Chile who has dedicated himself for several years to studying climate change, refers to this in an interview with him, from which I presented the following extract. Listen.
Recording
Not included
Patrick Michaels declaration before the Congress 7:20
Returning to Dr. Patrick Michaels, in his statement before the United States Congress, in 2010, he summarized the most important on this subject.
He stated that the atmosphere itself shows clear signs that the response to changes in carbon dioxide is much more modest than the consensus of scientific models appears to be.
How did he explain this? Well, in episode 31 I explained that there are several models presented by the IPCC where warming is predicted over time until the year 2100.
Now, due to mathematical and chemical reasons that it is not the case to explain here, the rate of temperature increase is constant. In this way these IPCC computer models became a kind of magic wand that easily predicts the future.
What Dr. Michaels then did was to compare the behavior of the observed rate of temperature increase with that of the IPCC computer models.
What he found and what he presented in his statement to Congress was that both the observed rate and the rate obtained by models varied since each of these showed periods of greater or lesser warming and even cooling. . Furthermore, he found that comparing the mean of the models with the observed rate of warming, the latter was considerably less than that of the IPCC computer model.
Conclusions and farewell 9:25
Concluding then, the rate of warming is neither constant nor as high as that of the IPCC models. But even more so, the latter indicates that the temperature response to CO2 concentrations is much lower than predicted.
What does this remind you of? Well, neither more nor less than what I explained in the previous episode known as CLIMATE SENSITIVITY.
This conclusion, which was reached using mathematical logic, but above all that of common sense, was recently fully proven thanks to the technological advance achieved through the application of artificial intelligence, and which I explained in the three episodes previous. It should be noted that as I presented in episode 29, Dr. Christy had also reached the same conclusion.
In the next episode I will talk about the possible reasons why all this evidence has been ignored.
What is presented today and what I will present in the future is in more detail in my book: THE TWO GREATEST SCIENTIFIC FRAUD OF THE 20TH AND 21ST CENTURIES. This can be purchased as a physical book, or as an ebook through my website estebanmoralesvankwartel.com where you can also find a lot of interesting information, and to which I invite you to subscribe.Here you can also access our podcast.
IT HAS BEEN A PLEASURE BEING WITH YOU. I HOPE I HAVE MET THE EXPECTATIONS THAT OUR RESPECTED LISTENERS HAVE FOR INFORMATION THAT IS HONEST AND USEFUL FOR THEIR OWN LIFE, FOR THEIR FAMILY AND FOR THE COMMUNITY IN WHICH THEY WORK
See you soon and thank you for honoring us with your attention.