presentation and introduction 0:00
As usual before starting the episode, I proceed to update on the scars left by the COVID-19 fraud
Official figures have been published indicating the virtually zero possibility of children getting sick and dying from this disease, unless they have serious co-morbidities; and even in these cases, these possibilities are low.
The anomalies that occurred in clinical trials of vaccines for children aged 5-18 years have already been talked about and verified ad nauseam, and even worse, those that occurred in trials for children under 5 years of age.
Numerous analyzes of VAERS, which we know to be the CDC's Vaccine Adverse Event Registry System, have shown time and time again a dramatic increase in serious adverse events and deaths in children.
We have talked about all this in our podcast where all the corresponding references are.
The discussion about the safety of this substance for use in children is becoming more and more growing.
A German study published in the journal JAMA last week showed that of 7,800 children under the age of five who received mRNA injections, 10 required subsequent hospitalization, meaning that young children are more likely to suffer from serious side effects.
This same study also sought to retrospectively assess the safety of Pfizer's SARS vaccine used in children under 5 years of age, compared to the safety of non-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in the same sample.
The results on this were not conclusive, which added more controversy to the discussion, due to the large number of limitations that this type of study has. What it does indicate is that much more research needs to be done on the safety of this inoculation. The authors themselves acknowledge that there are currently no safety data available for this vaccine in children under 5 years of age.
But in the midst of all this controversy and lack of sufficient data, the CDC HAS JUST APPROVED THE INCLUSION OF THIS SUBSTANCE IN THE VACCINATION SCHEDULE FOR INFANTS.
Thank God, in this country, this is made optional for each State, but what this will bring is that all over the world, those who applaud like seals everything that someone else says, will begin to include it in their respective official vaccination programs.
THIS, for a disease with very low morbidity and mortality among children, where, for example, in the United States, of the relatively few children supposedly dead from the disease, the CDC itself found that 35 percent of deaths from covid, reported in people under the age of 18, they had no provable connection to covid AND that, in children under the age of 12, deaths were almost exclusively limited to children with extremely severe comorbidities.
HOW MUCH LOWER ARE THE CDC AND THE US FDA GOING TO FALL?
LET US CONTINUE NOW WITH THE ISSUE OF CLIMATE CHANGE.
Hello, welcome to the 41st episode of our GREATEST SCIENTIFIC FRAUD podcast, and the thirteenth of our second season.
I am your host, Dr. Esteban Morales van Kwartel.
In the hysteria of the global warming paradigm there are two main protagonists. Both have been debased by the advocates of this: these are, the human being and CO2. In this episode I am going to refer to CO2, a gas that I think requires more respect and appreciation
PHOTOSYNTHESIS 4:48
Both in the human body and in the environment, CO2 is a product of the oxidation of organic material as part of essential processes for life.
In the environment, the origin of all oxygen is from the biological cycle caused by green plants through photosynthesis from water and CO2 or carbon dioxide.
In this way, CO2 is related to its precursor, oxygen, in what we could call a virtuous circle for life.
Co2 is produced thanks to oxygen, and this in turn is produced by photosynthesis from water and CO2 (carbon dioxide).
This process of photosynthesis requires the use of a large amount of energy supplied by sunlight. This energy is returned to be used by the human being. This is achieved through a reverse process that occurs thanks to the combustion of organic materials where that oxygen already produced is used,
In fact, most of the energy used by humans comes from burning wood and fossil fuels such as coal, sludge, natural gas, and oil.
As we see then, there is a whole relationship between the sun, CO2, oxygen and the organic materials mentioned, in a vital process for the generation and conservation of all life, human and non-human.
With Co2, it happens like when someone speaks ill of a person that no one knows and when they begin to know him, everyone realizes that what was said was not true.
THE GREENHOUSE EFFECT 7:01
Let us now see another aspect related to this, to definitively convince ourselves that CO2 is not the villain.
CO2 is one of the gases that are called "greenhouse effect". In this episode I am going to limit myself to presenting a short definition of what the greenhouse effect is and from the next episode I will delve deeper into this because it is of fundamental importance.
The greenhouse effect is a normal, natural mechanism of the Earth to maintain its heat and, therefore, its survival.
The Earth has an average temperature of 14 degrees Celsius. If this mechanism did not occur, the Earth would be 33% colder, which would not be sustainable for life as we know it.
This is important to know because in the hysteria and disinformation unleashed, the perception has been created in people's minds that the "greenhouse effect" is synonymous with misfortune and a global catastrophe. However, we do know that a greater than normal, than expected, increase in greenhouse gases causes warming.
Now, we know that CO2, according to the reports given by the IPCC, indicate that it has increased by approximately more than 30% since the pre-industrial era; but what is not emphasized is that this increase has been from 0.03% to 0.04%; In other words, this has been an increase of exactly 33%, which means 0.01%.
a part of this increase is of anthropogenic origin, especially by the combustion of fossil fuels and deforestation; but what the IPCC does not emphasize is that of this 0.4% or 400 PxM that represents the CO2 in the atmosphere, the human being contributes with only 4.3% of it, according to data from the same IPCC.
Conclusions and farewell 10:07
According to the IPCC, this will increase around 0.4% per year for the next few years. Remember, however, that these are prediction calculations of the future based on ASSUMED SCENARIOS. But although there is already evidence to contradict this, let us suppose that this is so; this would be an increase of 1.6 PXM, which would be an extremely small increase, of a gas that I already explained in a previous episode that has a very low sensitivity to temperature; much smaller than the IPCC had calculated. I already explained what climate sensitivity means, but as a reminder, this is the increase in global average temperature caused by a doubling of the concentration of CO2
But why this very low sensitivity; well, it has a reason related to its molecular structure, which causes it to absorb little heat, therefore contributing less to the greenhouse effect than all other gases.
This is known as "global warming potential". What does this mean; Greenhouse gases (GHGs) warm the Earth by absorbing energy and slowing the rate at which energy escapes into space. This allows that part that remains to heat the earth, which is good, as I already explained. Well, it happens that of all the gases in the EI, CO2 is the one with the least global warming potential.
But this does not end here. It happens that CO2 represents only 3.6% of all GHG; and all GHGs together represent 1% of the entire atmosphere.
Finally, between 50 and 60% of the CO2 is reabsorbed by what is known as "residual terrestrial sinks". The latter is important because it constitutes one of the natural regulation mechanisms of the Earth. I will talk about this another day.
All this means that this is a mechanism put in place by our Creator, in the necessary quantity and quality, that has worked for hundreds of thousands of years, with its own regulation mechanisms, and that will allow its operation for a very long time, as scientific evidence has been showing as this is better understood.
You see, most of the data that I used to do the analyzes that led to the writing of my book, I got from the IPCC documents and not from the so-called skeptics. That's when I realized several things:
1. That a lot of half-truths are mentioned.
2. Second, they use mathematical alternatives in the presentation of certain data, seeking to impress the reader.
3. There are thousands and thousands of pages of documents that only the very committed or the very insane dare to read.
What is presented today and what I will present in the future is in more detail in my book: THE TWO GREATEST SCIENTIFIC FRAUD OF THE 20TH AND 21ST CENTURIES. This can be purchased as a physical book, or as an ebook through my website estebanmoralesvankwartel.com where you can also find a lot of interesting information, and to which I invite you to subscribe.
Here you can also access our podcast.
IT HAS BEEN A PLEASURE BEING WITH YOU. I HOPE I HAVE MET THE EXPECTATIONS THAT OUR RESPECTED LISTENERS HAVE FOR INFORMATION THAT IS HONEST AND USEFUL FOR THEIR OWN LIFE, FOR THEIR FAMILY AND FOR THE COMMUNITY IN WHICH THEY WORK
See you soon and thank you for honoring us with your attention.