Presentation and introduction 0:00
It is time for public health authorities to leave the COVID-19 hoax behind and begin to be more responsible for public health and focus their efforts on the prevention and control of chronic noncommunicable diseases.
In the last 6 months, deaths from covid have become 1% of all deaths and it continues to drop. But what has become more important is the growing increase in excess deaths, especially in the most vaccinated countries, whose statistics I have been presenting in various episodes. Let's remember that this concept means all deaths that are not due to covid.
The available evidence shows that this decrease in lethality from COVID is mainly attributed to the providential appearance of the omicron, which has a very low lethality, and to the increase in natural immunity produced by covid infections.
As I have been explaining, this excess mortality is due, until proven otherwise, largely to the scars caused by the inoculation of gene therapy, either by the effects of the spike protein, which is induced by inoculation or by the weakening of immunity that it produces in people.
I have explained over and over again in various episodes of my podcast that most of the most prevalent health problems are diseases that generate inflammatory processes in our bodies, which trigger immunological reactions that can be lethal. This is the case, for example, of metabolic syndrome diseases, such as obesity, diabetes, hypertension, etc.
Regarding viral diseases in general, instead of continuing to wear down the population with the use of masks and other ridiculous restrictions that only destroy the immune system, work must begin to promote the large number of simple measures aimed at improving and strengthening the immune potential of the population, including those over 60 years of age who have irresponsibly been taken for granted that they are condemned to live with a depressed immune system.
Let's get on with climate change
Hello, welcome to episode No. 45 of our GREATEST SCIENTIFIC FRAUDS podcast, and the seventeenth of our second season.
I am your host, Dr. Esteban Morales van Kwartel.
In this episode I continue talking about external factors that interact with the 5 elements of the climate system and that play a fundamental role in the earth's climate. In this case, I will refer to clouds, which is a daily factor, and sulfates, which are daily, if they are the product of burning fossil fuels; or unusual, if they are the product of volcanic eruptions.
Role of clouds in the climate system 03:38
Clouds are a visible aggregate of small water droplets or ice particles in the atmosphere above the Earth's surface.
Now, the clouds have a tremendous influence in determining the weather. This is due to the fact that they generate a "feedback" in the Earth's climate whose characteristics differ according to the properties of the clouds.
Here comes the most interesting part of this and that explains the intricacies of the weather.
These properties depend on the action on the clouds by other climatic factors such as the ones we have mentioned (aerosols, water vapor, etc.), which gives rise to the fact that, due to this multiple interrelationship of factors, it places the clouds as the largest source of uncertainties in the study of climate.
As a consequence, once again, these predictions, made with such certainty, about unusual warming, do not have sufficient scientific support.
This situation occurs due to the different chemical characteristics of the aerosols that initiate the process of condensation in the clouds. Thus, for example, sulfates are particles generated in part by volcanic eruptions. Here I will explain what I promised in the previous episode.
Sulfates in the form of aerosols reflect the sun's radiation producing an intense negative energy force. (cooling) This effect is, however, transitory, but can last for a few years.
This explains what I said in the previous episode, that if this data is taken as a reference to predict the climate, since it starts with a cooling that is transitory, obviously, what comes later is a relative warming, when the effect of the sulfates. In other words, it would be a false warming prediction.
Sulfates are also a by-product of the combustion of fossil fuels that, in addition to reflecting the sun's radiation, also help to increase cloudiness a little, producing a negative energy force, which leads to cooling of the earth's surface.
What does this mean, since the greenhouse effect produced by this activity is partly offset by sulfates, thanks to the mechanisms explained.
Role of sulfates in climate sustem 06:59
Most aerosols have a high affinity for water molecules. This is known as "high hygroscopic property". Since clouds are basically water concentrates, the former adhere very easily and increasingly to the clouds; In this way, they grow in size, giving rise to reflect more and more solar radiation, thus producing a net difference in negative energy (cooling).
Given that when the water particles grow due to the hygroscopic action of the aerosols that act as condensation nuclei, these clouds, during the nights, with a high content of water vapor, and where there is no sun, act by exerting a greenhouse effect; therefore, they exert a positive energy force (heating).
As the particles have increased in size, they fall as rain or snow to the surface; if they fall like snow, the effect will be the generation of a negative energy force (cooling) since the white surface will reflect the sun's rays during the day; if it falls as rain, which produces a darker earth surface, the sun's rays will be absorbed producing heating.
As you can see, God has created various climate regulation-compensation echanisms.
Conclusions and farewell 08:59
This reflectivity of clouds, of which I have spoken, is known as albedo.
The average albedo of all clouds exerts a negative net energetic force; that is, they produce cooling of the earth's surface. However, the albedo is not constant, which is compatible with the natural variability of the climate.
This albedo is affected by innumerable factors, such as forest fires, the time of day, and even if the oceans have a lot of waves (more albedo) or if they are calm (less albedo), which is one of the explanations for the enormous uncertainty that clouds contain with respect to their effect on the climate.
Computer predictor models try to average all of these factors, but since they occur at multiple points and at different times, the data feeding these models is inaccurate.
This is one more example of the uncertainty of the climate and of the predictive models.
What I present today and what I will present in the future is in more detail in my book: THE TWO GREAT SCIENTIFIC FRAUDS OF THE XX AND XXI CENTURIES. This can be purchased as a physical book, or as an ebook through my website estebanmoralesvankwartel.com, where you can also find a lot of information of interest, and to which I invite you to subscribe.
Here you can also access our podcast.
IT HAS BEEN A PLEASURE BEING WITH YOU. I HOPE TO HAVE MEET THE EXPECTATIONS THAT OUR RESPECTED LISTENERS HAVE FOR HONEST AND USEFUL INFORMATION FOR THEIR OWN LIFE, FOR THEIR FAMILY AND FOR THE COMMUNITY IN WHICH THEY OPERATE
See you soon and thank you for honoring us with your attention.