Presentation and introduction 0:00
I want to remind you that the people who produced the COVID-19 hysteria are the same people who have revived the climate change hysteria. That is why at the beginning of these episodes on climate change I usually update on the scars left by the management of COVID.
Two things I want to mention about this.
The first thing is that Australia, the same country in which 96 percent of adults are inoculated, 72 percent of adults are reinforced; who had tax blocks by police for much of 2020 and 2021; that despite all this, around 85 percent of Australian deaths from COVID have occurred in 2022 and where almost all of them were not only vaccinated, but reinforced, it is the same Australia whose authorities have just suspended reinforcements in minors than 30 years, since the risk of myocarditis due to the reinforcement is greater than the disease itself. But not a word of apology about his misguided policies.
The other thing that I cannot fail to mention is that on the last business day of November another page of the most sinister and dark history of American public health was closed. Self-described man of science, Anthony Fauci will part ways with public service after 50 years as director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. A run he closes, writing his own evil and perverse epitaph with his last words in his final appearance at the White House briefing, which were as follows:
get vaccinated with the latest booster as soon as you get the chance.
Fauci thus closes a career that from its inception was marked by the presentation and promotion of a drug to combat AIDS with almost no efficacy and a large number of side effects. That in the year 2020 he promotes remdesivir whose use was contraindicated by the WHO from its inception due to its low efficacy and large number of side effects, but which is still used in the United States on his direct recommendation.
I have no more words left than to close with this sacred quote:
He does feats with his arm, he scatters the proud of heart. He puts down the mighty from their thrones and exalts the lowly.
He makes feats with his arm, scatters the proud of heart. He puts down the mighty from their thrones and exalts the lowly.
Hello, welcome to episode No. 46 of our GREATEST SCIENTIFIC FRAUDS podcast, and the seventeenth of our second season.
I am your host, Dr. Esteban Morales van Kwartel.
In the last 2 episodes I have described several of the most important climatic factors, namely water vapor, aerosols, clouds, sulphates, volcanic eruptions, and their importance in determining climate. I could say about this that the common denominator is that what they print the most to the climate is a great amount of uncertainty that makes a reasonable prediction about it almost impossible.
In this episode I am going to describe a natural phenomenon of great importance as a climatic factor and that gives the climate an additional content of uncertainties and that has been falsely described as causing calamities, and that has also been erroneously linked to global warming. This is the El Niño/La Niña phenomenon.
El Niño/La Niña 4:20
I have presented this phenomenon in my book as one with two large components, El Niño / La Niña, because, as we will see later, these are part of what can be considered a complement in that their causes and effects are closely related.
The existence of this climatic factor not only adds more uncertainty to the analysis of climate behavior, but it is the one that adds the most controversy to the discussion about it. To better understand these factors, it is necessary to analyze the normal oceanic-atmospheric phenomena that take place.
The trade winds, which I'm sure many listeners have heard of, normally blow the warm waters off the coast of Peru into the Western Pacific, which we know includes areas of China, Mongolia, New Zealand, etc. This zone, by itself, contains the warmest waters in the ocean. As this water flows, not only does the volume of water in the Western Pacific and its temperature increase considerably, but it also rises towards the surface, in the waters of the Eastern Pacific, where the coasts of Peru are, the coldest layers that contain a large amount of of nutrients and, therefore, fish.
This situation is what has sustained the inhabitants of the surrounding coasts economically and alimentarily. The much warmer waters of the West create a more unstable atmosphere around them, determining the pattern of tropical storms and warming of the atmosphere. We then have a natural phenomenon that generates other natural phenomena.
Well, at certain times of the year, the migration of the sun makes the trade winds weaken, and the warm waters flow, then, towards the colder coasts of South America; that is, the reverse direction of what happened before, making the nutrient and the fish disappear, so the fishermen take a break; this happens around Christmas; hence the name given to the phenomenon.
Effects of El Niño/La Niña 7:05
Caused by the pressure differences between the "great hot pool" of the Western Pacific and the Eastern Pacific, this phenomenon becomes so intense from time to time that not only do the trade winds weaken, but they also they reverse, unleashing oceanic and atmospheric effects that defenders of the climate change paradigm have called unusual, and attributed great calamities to it.
The warm waters, in this case, change the pattern of storms and heating, which produces a large decrease in the cooling of the Earth; these effects extend well beyond tropical regions. When the trade winds return to their normal condition, a much larger amount of cold water is generated, greatly lowering the temperature along the coast of South America.
This then gives rise to what is known as the La Niña phenomenon. This enormous flow of cold water moves towards the Western Pacific, which, as I said before, is characterized by being warmer, also producing atmospheric and climatic phenomena opposite to those generated by the flow of warm water that occurred during El Niño.
Conclusions and farewell 8:50
Numerous arguments have been put forward trying to present these events as extreme, unusual, and linked to global warming. In addition, they have been linked to climatic calamities that occurred in various regions.
For example, in the IPCC reports (I remind you again that this is the acronym that stands for INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL on CLIMATE CHANGE, which is an intergovernmental organization of the United Nations whose mission is to provide technical follow-up on the issue of climate change.
Well, in their reports it is stated that the phenomena related to El Niño consisting of regional variations in rainfall and temperatures over a large part of the tropics, subtropical zones and other latitudes, have intensified in frequency, intensity and duration, since the middle of the year. 1970, compared to the 19th century. Likewise, it is related to climate change, droughts, and at the same time, extreme rains and loods.
Is this so, as stated by the IPCC? In the next episode, next week, I will analyze the veracity or not of this, and where I will show the scientific evidence presented on this subject, by prestigious experts. Do not miss it.
What I present today and what I will present in the future is in more detail in my book: THE TWO GREAT SCIENTIFIC FRAUDS OF THE XX AND XXI CENTURIES. This can be purchased as a physical book, or as an ebook through my website estebanmoralesvankwartel.com, where you can also find a lot of information of interest, and to which I invite you to subscribe.
Here you can also access our podcast.
IT HAS BEEN A PLEASURE BEING WITH YOU. I HOPE TO HAVE MEET THE EXPECTATIONS THAT OUR RESPECTED LISTENERS HAVE FOR HONEST AND USEFUL INFORMATION FOR THEIR OWN LIFE, FOR THEIR FAMILY AND FOR THE COMMUNITY IN WHICH THEY OPERATE
See you soon and thank you for honoring us with your attention.