Iintroduction 0:00
Summer recently began in Florida. And for many, the tasty warmth typical of Florida and the opportunity to enjoy the beach with its warm waters. But along with this the campaign of fear resumed. And the extreme weather statistic begins.
They are meant to make readers believe that a climate apocalypse is upon us, which gives the sitting in the presidency of the United States opportunity to reiterate their campaign to eliminate gas stoves, promote electric cars made in China, windmills, made in China, Ahh but they forgot that Jeff Bezos' $65 million Gulf Stream plane preceded a caravan of 400 private jets that went to the last COP26 environmental summit to be held in Scotland.
There were so many private planes that according to local news created such a traffic congestion that forced empty planes to fly 30 miles to find parking space.
According to the estimates that were made, these jets spread 13,000 tons of CO2 into the atmosphere, which will generate more global warming gas than 1,600 Scots burn in a year.
Of course in this event of climate hypocrisy Biden as well as many other famous figures such as Arnold Schwarzenegger, Bill Gates and singer Ellie Goulding and many others spoke against global warming in this event that was heralded as a watershed moment to take action on limiting carbon emissions.
Hello, welcome to episode No. 55 of our podcast GREAT SCIENTIFIC FRAUDS, and No. 27 of our second season.
I am your host Dr. Esteban Morales van Kwartel.
In this episode I continue with the conclusions initiated last week. For a better understanding of these conclusions it is important to make a final consideration about how truthful and accurate the climate models are. Today I will begin to develop this topic, but first I will make a few brief comments on temperature indicators.
Temperature indicators. 02:55
To give context to the issue of the veracity of the predictions, I must begin with a few brief comments on the temperature indicators that are being provided by the news media announcing local climates.
Every week an apparent new temperature record is announced. On Saturday of last week there was talk of a new record with respect to the year 2014, of 87 farengheith vs 86. This is absurd, first because you cannot take such short periods to compare and second and more important, that temperature is a variable; This means that it varies, and if it varies, sometimes it is lower and sometimes higher, depending on a large number of other variables that interact with it. In addition, if that Saturday there was a record, then the previous days or following days in which a record is not reported, possibly then the historical temperatures recorded on those days could have been equal or lower. Temperatures are indicators and indicators are variable.
Well, one of those other factors that affect this variability are, among many others, the El Niño and La Niña phenomenon. I have explained this extensively in my podcasts, but especially, in detail in my book. I have already said that the El Niño phenomenon, the abundant evidence of which indicates that it has no relation to climate change and that it is a phenomenon dating back hundreds of thousands of years, is causing warming.
I have already explained extensively why and how the El Niño phenomenon occurs and how it affects global temperature and I do not have space today to explain it again. I just want to remind you
IN YEARS WHEN THERE IS THE PHENOMENON OF THE LA NIÑA CHILD, THERE IS A WARMING OF THE EARTH'S SURFACE.
And, gentlemen, in June a new El Niño phenomenon began to occur and this year the calculations indicate that it will be a year of El Niño phenomenon. That's climatology.
The probability that our young El Niño will continue even during the winter is over 90%. And there are already well-marked signs that this is a very strong Niño, and this is having and will continue to have in the rest of the year and perhaps part of the other, a strong effect on global weather patterns.
NOAA stands for NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION. This is a United States federal organization of great influence and prestige throughout the world. Well, NOAA uses certain indices to declare a year as the year of the Niño; this calculation revealed an extremely high level which not only qualifies him as such, but he is a tremendously strong Child.
El NIÑO and the warm-up 07:01
As the trade winds become weaker they allow the surface to continue warming, and make a feedback mechanism. The peak of these riots almost always occurs in November-January; but other parts of the world may see impacts before that: June and July, as has been seen as well as August.
There are other temperature indicators, which I will talk about in the next episode, which indicate that although it has been a hot June and July, they have not been, as shouted loudly, the hottest in history. But more so, as a criterion of appalling warming an arbitrary indicator is being used that is 1.5 degrees C above the average temperature of the period 1850-1900.
First, no one has explained why this is an apocalyptic indicator; Second, there have been much hotter times, with temperatures above this arbitrary threshold, when mankind flourished greatly, as was, for example, the Middle Ages, and when, by the way, there were not even the great factories of the industrial period.
But the most important thing to comment on now is the assertion that this warming is caused by the effects of greenhouse gases produced by humans.
This warming of July has been taken advantage of by the same as always, to continue disrespecting us by creating terror in humanity for the fulfillment of their purposes.
The Secretary-General of the World Meteorological Organisation said: "The extreme weather that affected many millions of people in July is, unfortunately, the harsh reality of climate change and a foretaste of the future.". The need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is more urgent than ever."
Among many others, the most disrespectful has been, of course, United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Gutierrez, who said: "For large parts of North America, Asia, Africa and Europe, it is a cruel summer. For the entire planet, it's a disaster. And for scientists, it's unequivocal: humans are to blame. All of this is entirely consistent with repeated predictions and warnings."
But he also had the chutzpah and disrespect to say, "Climate change is here. It's scary and it's just the beginning... The era of global boiling has arrived."
First, the leaders of these organizations that we pay with our taxes should not be there to terrorize, but to educate by explaining the facts as they are; Like me. And many others, we have been trying to do.
Second, everything is as false as have been the predictions with which we have been terrorized for many years.
Apart from the fact that there has been the cynicism of ignoring the existence and effects of natural phenomena in this, one of which I explained again today, but many others have already been explained, Dr. John Christy has already debunked this fallacy. I begin to explain this now and finish in the next episodes.
Conclusions and farewell 12:54
How truthful and accurate are climate models?
In 2007 there was a discussion about the feasibility and accuracy of temperature prediction models that showed a warming greater than the observed data revealed, which presented, not only a decrease in warming, but a tendency to stop it. The climate prediction models presented a series of deficiencies that significantly modify their predictive capacity. These shortcomings continue to this day; The fundamental reason for this is the existence of a great complexity inherent in the climate, which makes it extremely difficult to predict.
On May 13, 2015, Dr. John Christy appears before the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives of the United States of America. The hearing would focus on the revised draft from President Obama's Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). This Council was the one that initiated all the attacks that we see today on carbon emissions and the strategies aimed at reducing them.
Dr. Christy focused on refuting, with evidence, many of the assertions (hypotheses) that had been wielded on this subject. He began by referring to the CEQ approach to the effect of GHGs on climate change, where emissions, under this approach, are considered as a direct representation of the negative impacts of climate change. This is a supposed cause-and-effect relationship that lacks all statistical evidence.
He then went on to highlight the limited scope of this assertion where the two main beneficial effects of this increase in emissions are not considered: the improvement of the duration and quality of human life through affordable energy, and the strengthening of the biosphere, referring to plant material used for human consumption.
In the next episode I continue with the forceful and shocking findings presented by Dr. Christy.
What I presented today and what I will present in the future, is in more detail in my book: THE TWO GREAT SCIENTIFIC FRAUDS OF THE TWENTIETH AND TWENTY-FIRST CENTURIES. This can be purchased in all branches of the prestigious Panamanian bookstore, EL HOMBRE DE LA MANCHA
This can also be purchased through my website estebanmoralesvankwartel.com to which I invite you to subscribe. Here you can also access our podcast and find much other information of interest.
IT HAS BEEN A PLEASURE TO BE WITH YOU. I HOPE I HAVE MET THE EXPECTATIONS OF OUR RESPECTED LISTENERS FOR INFORMATION THAT IS HONEST AND USEFUL FOR THEIR OWN LIVES, FOR THEIR FAMILIES AND FOR THE COMMUNITY IN WHICH THEY OPERATE.
See you soon and thank you for honoring us with your attention.