Presehtation and Iintroduction 0:00
In this final summary of the paradigm of human-induced climate change, I cannot fail to reproduce the following words of Dr. Douglas Pollock.
Listen
Translation of audio not available.
Hello, welcome to episode No. 58 of our podcast GREAT SCIENTIFIC FRAUDS, and No. 30 of our second season.
I am your host Dr. Esteban Morales van Kwartel.
With this final summary, I conclude the topic of global warming and the paradigm of human-produced climate change initiated in 1988 with the presentation to the public of the warming curve developed by Dr. James Hansen and promoted during the last 35 years by the UN.
The fraud of global warming. 03:23
The issue of global warming and its economic implications is really difficult and full of many edges; But a full and honest approach to this can lead us to make decisions favorable to humanity. These decisions should focus on the following:
• Decision between improving global warming in the most efficient way versus using this issue as a pivot to address other political, social and economic projects, endangering our current form of economy.
• Decision to spend a huge sum of money to slow a small portion of warming versus investing these funds in the development of disadvantaged countries.
• Decision between, delaying the cutting of emissions and starting efforts to seek alternative sources of power versus starting to spend on the process of cutting emissions that becomes less expensive over time, and that offers results of little impact on warming.
But for this to happen, there must be a willingness for dialogue and suspend the censorship and disqualification of those who present approaches different from the current paradigm.
The issue of global warming has become one of the greatest scientific frauds of humanity of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries (without prejudice to the fact that the current issue of the coronavirus, about which I have spoken throughout the first season of my podcast, becomes the greatest scientific fraud in the history of humanity).
The progressive lines of thought that dominate the main world media and represented by a huge number of organizations in the world, promote the idea that developed countries reduce their CO2 emissions thanks to a "significant" decrease in their industrial production, in order to give the necessary space to the industrial development of underdeveloped nations.
But it happens that among these nations are China and India which, due to a conceptual distortion that I have already explained, are considered underdeveloped", so they are not forced to control their emissions, when, at the same time, both represent a huge percentage of CO2 emissions in the world. But worse still, the real underdeveloped countries, which are politically weak, are pressured, in different ways, to reduce their emissions.
But even more, the technological development that has occurred so far, has allowed the advance of today's society in general, thanks to the transfer of this technology to other nations, which has occurred and will continue to occur until the same technology generates other alternative sources of energy. The latter has also been taking place, in large part, thanks to the current use of available energy, which is precisely provided by fossil fuels.
Climate, a political and ideological issue. 07:27
The debate on global warming has been forced to be, from its inception until now, a political, moral and economic issue. This has been expressed by the main representatives of progressive-socialist liberalism, as shown in the tweet of Bernie Sanders, former candidate for the presidency of the United States for the Democratic Party and current senator for the same party and which I quote below:
"We have less than 12 years to transform our energy system away from fossil fuels into sustainable energy with energy efficiency... This is a moral imperative. There is no other choice."
In the same way, the congresswoman for the Democratic Party Ocassio Cortez, of the same ideological tendency, expresses the following:
"This is a political crisis of inaction and it will require political will, political courage, so that we can deal with this issue with the urgency required for the next generation."
The issue, obviously, has become political, led by certain political and ideological thoughts, with the good faith of an enormous number of honest citizens who have believed in a discourse promoted by almost all the media and who respond to this political and ideological agenda.
These politicians are the same ones who have been intensively promoting the so-called "green new deal" that they have managed to insert into various institutions and programs, which have already cost the American taxpayer billions of dollars. An agreement that is aimed at seeking a massive transformation of the economy of the United States and the world with the same principles of the Tokyo Protocol and the Paris Agreement, analyzed in these last episodes: reduction of CO2 emissions; eliminate the use of fossil fuels; the use of 100% clean and renewable energy, and some others.
Conclusions and farewell 10:10
The agreement imposes the goal of achieving the full use of 100% clean and renewable energy with zero GHG emissions in ten years, thanks to a list of characteristics that makes it absurd, some of which are:
a dramatic expansion and rapid transformation of all energy sources; transformation of all existing buildings in the United States to achieve maximum energy efficiency; a 100% clean and zero-emission manufacturing industry; zero-emission vehicle infrastructure; an agricultural and livestock industry with zero pollution and GHG emissions. I emphasize the latter a bit because they have already explicitly said what this means.
SIMPLY, NOT COWS OR AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION IN GENERAL.
Hence the campaign to change our eating habits; hence the accelerated creation of meat substitute foods; Hence the attacks on producers' lands in all parts of the world.
The subject, therefore, has ceased to be scientific, so it has been denied a frank and open debate, denying, likewise, the complete information to all that honest population and that has the right to the truth; a truth that will only emerge when people refuse to be manipulated and to have ideas implanted in them through mass propaganda; The truth will come out when people demand the free right to information and demand a broad debate where ideas from all sectors of thought are confronted, on equal terms.
This has been my last episode on this subject which has not failed to produce some inconveniences. But these have been dispelled and more than compensated by the satisfaction of having given my small contribution to bring us a little closer to the truth. No human being is the repository of absolute truth, but using the attributes of scientific thought, we can approach it. These attributes can be further strengthened if we incorporate the use of common sense into our mental practice.
What I presented today and what I will present in the future, is in more detail in my book: THE TWO GREAT SCIENTIFIC FRAUDS OF THE TWENTIETH AND TWENTY-FIRST CENTURIES. This can be purchased in all branches of the prestigious Panamanian bookstore, EL HOMBRE DE LA MANCHA
This can also be purchased through my website estebanmoralesvankwartel.com to which I invite you to subscribe. Here you can also access our podcast and find much other information of interest.
IT HAS BEEN A PLEASURE TO BE WITH YOU. I HOPE I HAVE MET THE EXPECTATIONS OF OUR RESPECTED LISTENERS FOR INFORMATION THAT IS HONEST AND USEFUL FOR THEIR OWN LIVES, FOR THEIR FAMILIES AND FOR THE COMMUNITY IN WHICH THEY OPERATE.
See you soon and thank you for honoring us with your attention.