"hueso de mis huesos y carne de mi carne"

Este es el episodio No 63 y el quinto de la tercera temporada de nuestro podcast  GRANDES FRAUDES CIENTIFICOS.

Hasta el momento he ido describiendo los componentes de la ideología de género tal como sus propulsores la presentan, valiéndome de documentos y bibliografía correspondiente a sus gestores. He resaltado las imprecisiones de esta desde el punto de vista moral y conceptual, apoyado por diversos documentos de la Iglesia católica y de la moral cristiana en general.

En este episodio abordo los argumentos científicos que descalifican rotundamente esta ideología, sin cesar en la presentación de argumentos conceptuales. Afortunadamente hay muchos autores, científicos, investigadores, intelectuales que, motivados por la necesidad de la búsqueda de la verdad y su amor a instituciones como la familia, el Sacramento del matrimonio y en general, a su fervoroso amor a sus valores judaicos cristianos, han venido escudriñando sobre esto. Yo estaré citando a varios de estos autores. 

REFERENCIAS

 Favale, Abigail, The Genesis of Gender : A Christian Theory. Ignatius Press: 2022; ISBN:978-1-64229-217-6

https://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/audiences/1979/documents/hf_jp-ii_aud_19791107.html

Exploring the Biological Contributions to Human Health: Does Sex Matter? (2001)

http://nap.nationalacademies.org/10028

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/article-abstract/1772343

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4009730/

https://press.vatican.va/content/salastampa/es/bollettino/pubblico/2024/04/08/080424c.html 

Para abordar otros temas relacionados que podrán también ser de mucho interés, los invito a adquirir mi libro: LOS DOS GRANDES FRAUDES CIENTIFICOS DE LOS SIGLOS XX y XXI. Este lo pueden adquirir como libro físico en todas las sucursales de la librería panameña EL HOMBRE DE LA MANCHA. Igualmente, puede ser adquirido como ebook haciendo clic AQUI

Los invito a suscribirse a mi sitio web donde podrán acceder a nuestro podcast y a mucha otra información de interés. Este lo pueden encontrar también en los directorios de Apple podcast; de spotify y todos los mayores directorios de podcasts. 

Pueden enviar sus comentarios y observaciones  a través de mi sitio web, así como a mi correo electrónico estebanmoralesvk@gmail.com

Chapters

• 0:00 Presentación e introducción
• 4:37 El "paradigma del género"
• 10:44 El verbo divino y la verdadera Creación
• 16:29 ¿El sexo importa?
• 19:03 Conclusiones y despedida

Transcript

Presehtation and Iintroduction   0:00

Three years ago, a group of young people and a group of intellectuals were interviewed about why young people were increasingly agnostic and even atheistic. Let's listen to a small portion and comment later.

VIDEO 

The components and arguments of this gender ideology create nothing but anguish, uneasiness and confusion for themselves and those around them. Specially, youth is increasingly confused; more and more skeptical, more distrustful, more agnostic. But the main reason for this is their lack of information and the failure to look for it in the right places: their parents, family, teachers. However, it must be recognized that, unfortunately, those appropriate places sometimes fail, which makes the situation worse. The young woman presented in this video actively participates in the Catholic Church; she is a teacher, catechist and works with children and young people, but she chooses not to follow or teach all the truths contained in the Gospels but only some, leaving out those that are not of her preference.

Hello, today is Tuesday, June 11, 2024, the year of the Lord. Welcome to episode No. 63 and the fifth episode of the third season of our podcast BIGGEST SCIENTIFIC FRAUDS.

I am your host, Dr. Esteban Morales van Kwartel.

So far I have been describing the components of gender ideology as its proponents present it, using documents and bibliography corresponding to its managers. I have highlighted the inaccuracies of this from the moral and conceptual point of view, supported by various documents of the Catholic Church and of Christian morality in general. In this episode I will begin to address the scientific arguments that flatly disqualify this ideology, without ceasing in the presentation of conceptual arguments. Fortunately there are many authors, scientists, researchers, intellectuals who, motivated by the need for the search for truth and their love for institutions such as the family, the Sacrament of marriage and in general, their fervent love for their Judaic Christian values, have been scrutinizing this. I will be quoting several of these authors. 

The Divine Word and the True Creation. 04:37

Jesus Christ, in Matthew 19:4-6, has endowed the arguments of the science that I will unveil with the basis, the reasoning and the soul, when, addressing the Pharisees; he reminds them of the original order written in Genesis: (I quote) "Have you not read that He who made them at the beginning made them male and female, and said: Therefore a man shall leave father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh?" According to the postmodern philosophy embraced by the ideologues of the genre, as I explained at length in the previous episode, human beings from our thoughts create our own reality and through the word, language, this is transformed into the truth that everyone, according to them, must accept. In this sense, the body is given the meaning we want. These ideologues add that the concepts of the body of woman and man are creations of language and can be inhabited by anyone according to their own will. Abigail Favale in her book, which I will refer to at length at different times, points out the difference between thought and speech from man and that from the Creator, God, when referring to the act of Creation narrated in Genesis: (I quote) "Through language; He speaks to the world so that it exists. This divine Word is the engine of creation, and it is this Word that will become incarnate in Christ." Human beings cannot create or change what has already been created by God; To pretend to do so is to pretend to be a god. This Creation is alluded to in the document Dignitas Infinita where it is stated that the work created by God "is prior to all our decisions and experiences". On November 7, 1979, Pope St. John Paul II held a beautiful audience where he clarified the concept of "original unity" contained in Genesis. This allows us to understand God's creation and His authority over it. Here, meditate on the Creation of man. The pope alludes to the narrative in Genesis 1 of the creation of man, of the human being, as male and female from the beginning. 

He then meditates on the narrative of Genesis 2 where this creation is described in more detail, and I quote: "The Yahwist text of the second chapter authorizes us, in a way, to think first only of man, since, by means of the body, he belongs to the visible world, but goes beyond it. So, it makes us think of the same man, but through the dualism of sex." In this second chapter, Genesis describes how, due to man's loneliness in not being able to share with an equal, only with other beings different from him, he puts that human in a deep sleep and creates the woman with the rib that he extracts. This further highlights the difference between the claim of creation by the ideologues of the genre, with Creation by God. Not only does he create the human being, but after a kind of "divine reflection" he subjects him to a deep sleep where he modifies and awakens him in front of a creature that satisfies both the creator and man; but even more, this creature, Eve, as the pope emphasizes, is part of that "original unity" of man and woman: (I quote) "Somatic homogeneity, despite the difference in constitution linked to sexual difference, is so evident that man, upon awakening from the genetic dream, expresses it immediately, when he says: "This is finally bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh." But in addition to highlighting this homogeneity, the purpose and anthropology of the human being is also shown. This is how Abigail Favale expresses it in her book: (I quote) "The creation accounts do not provide scientific truths about material origins; they reveal deeper truths: truths about identity, who God is and who we are, and purpose, the ends for which we are made." I will refer to these scientific truths in the next section.

Does sex matters?.  10:44

Sex and gender have been under discussion for many years as we have been able to see in these brief historical screenshots that I have presented. These terms have been tremendously deformed as a result of politicization, the ideologization of terms and as a consequence of relativism and postmodernism. Finally, in 2001 a report by the Institute of Medicine of the United States appeared: "Exploring biological contributions to human health: does sex matter?" Here the authors reported on the presence of rapidly growing evidence of important distinctions between men and women at all levels of existence: from the sociological level to the molecular level. The report, which dates back more than 20 years, is presented in light of rapid advances in molecular biology and genetics. These differences are expressed at the cellular level, in that each one has its own sexual genotype which, as we know, is xx in women and xy in men. For example, differences in certain diseases have been found between men and women, due to the ability of the genes of the sex chromosomes to express themselves differently between the two sexes. This is determined by several factors, including genetic branding. They indicate that this genetic mark is determined depending on the fact that the x chromosome of the new being comes from the mother or the father. In addition to the genetic mark, this sex-linked variability is also related to hormonal changes that occur within the uterus in which the new being is present and that will be expressed in later periods after birth. A very important aspect in the research carried out that is expressed in this report is the scientific conception of gender, which, as I said in a previous chapter, is far from the exclusively cultural and environmental connotation given to it by the theorists of gender ideology. The report highlights current knowledge about sexual identity behaviors and reinforcement during the prepubertal period. These are related to hormonal changes and the development of secondary sexual characteristics. These changes continue to occur in adolescence and adulthood. So these hormonal events of puberty establish the basis for the biological differences that occur throughout life.

In other words, gender is not only a cultural, environmental event independent of sex; it is also intimately linked to the entire multiple biological, chemical and genetic mechanism that occurs and is related to sex. Both sexual characteristics and gender characteristics are developed and reaffirmed throughout the different stages of the individual's life. As stated in the document "dignitas infinita", "sex and gender can be distinguished, but they cannot be separated". In fact, behavioral and cognitive differences between men and women are documented as a product of influences from both nature - biology, genetics, etc. - and the environment. John Money, Psychiatrist, psychologist, sexologist refers to this in an article published in JAMA: (I quote) "Gender role and gender identity are two sides of the same coin, gender identity/role... gender identity/role is not the product of nature or the environment acting alone, but of both interacting in crucial periods of developmental differentiation... Social scientists and sexologists are among those who, for the most part, have not made the paradigm shift." In the report, the authors establish that there is evidence that cells, because they have different sex characteristics, affect brain functions differently in the two sexes, influencing behavior and gender identity, and establish differences in cognitive ability. Likewise, hormones determine cognitive sexual behavior and dimorphism. Likewise, the authors refer to sexual differences in terms of the pattern of diseases; differences in responses to pharmacological agents; in the response to pain, etc. Finally, the authors establish some recommendations that we will see in the next section.

The gender paradigm. 16:29

They recommend emphasizing areas of study at the cellular level such as: the functions and effects of genes linked to the X and Y chromosomes; the effects on organs, systems, and apparatus. They also recommend studying how these sex differences affect the response to diseases. They also recommend studying the difference between the effects produced by genes and hormones; To study the influences produced by the intrauterine environment and how sexual difference affects people's longevity. In addition, they recommend that in studies of human subjects, the term sex be used as a classification, differentiated in its two components: male or female, according to the reproductive organs and functions that derive from the chromosomal composition. This has obviously infuriated the promoters of gender ideology who are the ones who have created the confusion of multiple genders, the countless number of pronouns and even sexes in the non-binary group, and which they want to impose on the rest of society. This is why Abigail Favale goes beyond considering it a gender ideology. She calls it the "gender paradigm." As I explained in one of my episodes last season, Thomas Kuhn espouses the "paradigm of science." According to him, as a result of a consensus, a reality is constructed that must be accepted by all others as a truth. In this case, Favale explains, the gender paradigm is based on the consensus of a sector of the population that there is no Creator. This sector is then free to create itself; they create the concept of body, its own meaning and anthropology. Here, Man and Woman are created concepts, based on language, and that can be inhabited by anyone. In the end, everyone must accept this "truth." This must be accepted by all institutions, including educational institutions; as in fact is happening in many countries. In the next section, the conclusions and farewell.

Conclusions and farewell  19:03 

Throughout the episodes presented, we have been seeing how the shaping of this paradigm has been strongly influenced by psychologists, social scientists, historians, etc., who have ignored, not only the truths of Revelation, which was to be expected, but also the existing biological principles, and even the knowledge about biochemistry and the cellular level. that even though they corresponded to times prior to the current one, they already showed strong evidence of the differences between the two sexes. However, despite the rapid advances in our current era of basic sciences and molecular biology, they refuse to discuss the subject in the light of new knowledge. They continue to insist on the imposition of their thinking, assuring that it is the truth. As time goes by, it is being shown that what the defenders of gender ideology advocate is anything but science. They continue to maintain their "gender paradigm" as defined by Abigail Favale. In an environment of moral and spiritual superficiality, doctrines such as relativism, skepticism, constructivism, postmodernism, and many others, seduce people, especially the youngest. These give them the false feeling that they will make their lives easier, more bearable and with fewer commitments and sacrifices. The simple and humble doctrine of Jesus does not suit their lives because it generates sacrifices, it complicates them. What they fail to understand is that we are the ones who have to accommodate ourselves to Jesus, and not the other way around. Christianity is not a narrative created by human beings and can therefore be interpreted, revised, manipulated or changed by other human beings. It is an original narrative from the Creator. The young woman we hear at the beginning of the episode, bets on changing the future of things in the Church, but let us remember: glory to the Father, to the Son to the Holy Spirit; As it was in the beginning, now and ever, forever and ever, amen. As a result of the recommendations given in the report, in these little more than 20 years that have elapsed, progress has been made in new studies. In the next episode, next week, I'll begin to touch on some of these new studies.

In the episode description you can find all the references on today's topic.

I invite you to purchase my book: THE TWO GREAT SCIENTIFIC FRAUDS OF THE 20TH AND 21ST CENTURIES. Here I describe and analyze in a simple way and with responsible scientific evidence everything related to misrepresentations about the climate. This can be purchased in all branches of the prestigious Panamanian bookstore, EL HOMBRE DE LA MANCHA.

I invite you to access our website estebanmoralesvankwartel.com to which I invite you to subscribe. Here you can also access all the episodes of our podcast and find a lot of other information of interest. Through my website you can also purchase our book THE TWO GREAT SCIENTIFIC FRAUDS OF THE 20TH AND 21ST CENTURIES.

IT HAS BEEN A PLEASURE TO BE WITH YOU. I HOPE THAT I HAVE MET THE EXPECTATIONS OF OUR RESPECTED LISTENERS FOR INFORMATION THAT IS HONEST AND USEFUL TO THEIR OWN LIVES, TO THEIR FAMILIES, AND TO THE COMMUNITY IN WHICH THEY OPERATE

See you soon and thank you for honoring us with your attention.