Top 4 Technologies Fueling America’s Hydrogen Future by 2035 Part 1

Welcome to The Hydrogen Podcast! I’m Paul Rodden, and today kicks off Part 1 of our special two-part series on building the U.S. hydrogen economy by 2035. In this episode, we break down the four core hydrogen production technologies shaping America’s clean energy strategy:

🚀 Featured Technologies:

1. Steam Methane Reforming (SMR) with Carbon Capture
2. Methane Pyrolysis
3. Natural Hydrogen
4. Nuclear Hydrogen

🔍 We explore:

• The carbon intensity (CI) and scalability of each pathway
• Real-world project examples like ExxonMobil’s Baytown plant and Monolith’s plasma pyrolysis pilot
• Tech innovation from Aurora Hydrogen and Koloma’s natural H2 drilling
• Cost analysis based on data from the DOE, IEA, and BloombergNEF
• The economic impact of 45V and 45Q tax credits under H.R.1
• High-value hydrogen derivatives like low-CI ammonia and sustainable aviation fuel (SAF)

💥 Bonus: Learn how each technology plays into the $200B ammonia and $1T SAF markets by 2050.

This is the definitive roadmap for tech leaders, investors, and policymakers shaping hydrogen’s role in the U.S. energy transition.

👉 Subscribe so you don’t miss Part 2, where we cover hydrogen infrastructure, regional hubs, and market deployment across the U.S.

Transcript

Welcome to The Hydrogen Podcast, where we fuel your curiosity for hydrogen’s role in the energy transition with crisp economics, bold tech, and a dash of playful optimism. I’m Paul Rodden, your energy analyst host, and today we’re launching the first of a two-part series on building the U.S. hydrogen economy by 2035. In Part 1, we’re diving into the top technology opportunities driving this revolution: steam methane reforming with carbon capture and storage, methane pyrolysis, natural hydrogen, and nuclear hydrogen. We’ll unpack their technological edge, crunch the numbers on their economics, and shine a spotlight on high-value derivatives like low-CI ammonia and sustainable aviation fuel. All cost estimates come from the U.S. Department of Energy, International Energy Agency, and BloombergNEF, ensuring industry-standard benchmarks. So, strap in, and let’s ignite the hydrogen spark!

Let’s kick off with the four technologies poised to jumpstart the U.S. hydrogen economy. Each offers unique strengths, from mature infrastructure to cutting-edge innovation, and together they form a diversified strategy to decarbonize industry and transport.

First, steam methane reforming with carbon capture and storage, or SMR with CCS. This is the workhorse of U.S. hydrogen production, accounting for 95% of the 10 million tons produced annually, per IEA. SMR uses natural gas to produce hydrogen, capturing 60–90% of CO2 emissions and storing them underground, achieving a CI of 0.5–1 kg CO2e per kg when optimized, per DOE. Projects like ExxonMobil’s Baytown facility in Texas, producing 1 million tons annually, leverage existing pipelines and refineries, making SMR with CCS a scalable, near-term solution. Key advancements include high-efficiency capture systems, reducing energy penalties by 20%, per Nature Energy.

Next, methane pyrolysis, a rising star. Unlike SMR, pyrolysis splits methane into hydrogen and solid carbon at 800–1600°C, avoiding CO2 emissions. With renewable electricity, it achieves a CI of 1.5 kg CO2e per kg, per Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. Monolith’s Nebraska pilot, backed by a $1 billion DOE loan, uses plasma torches to produce hydrogen and carbon black, a $12.8 billion market by 2032, per DataHorizon Research. Innovations like Aurora Hydrogen’s microwave pyrolysis, consuming 37.7 kJ/mole H2, promise modular, on-site production, ideal for niche applications like transport.

Third, natural hydrogen, the wild card. Found in geological formations, it’s extracted via drilling, with near-zero CI (0 kg CO2e per kg), per IEA. Koloma’s pilots in Kansas tap Midcontinent Rift deposits, potentially yielding 1–2 million tons annually, per DOE. Early-stage tech focuses on improving well purity and flow rates, with $245 million in funding driving exploration, per Nature Communications. Its simplicity—no processing, just extraction—makes it a game-changer if scaled.

Finally, nuclear hydrogen, your personal favorite. Using excess nuclear power for electrolysis, it leverages 94 U.S. reactors (98 GW) to produce hydrogen at 0.1–0.5 kg CO2e per kg, per DOE. Constellation’s Nine Mile Point in New York, producing 1 ton daily since 2023, showcases proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyzers running at 60–70% efficiency, per ScienceDirect. Stable baseload power ensures 80–90% capacity factors, unlike renewables’ 30–40%, making nuclear a reliable choice for steady production.

These technologies—SMR’s scale, pyrolysis’s innovation, natural hydrogen’s cost, and nuclear’s stability—form a robust foundation. Let’s turn to their economics.

Now, let’s crunch the numbers. Economics will make or break these technologies, especially with H.R.1’s 45V and 45Q tax credits shaping the landscape. Here’s how each stacks up, with costs per kilogram driving the story.

SMR with CCS is the cost leader at $1–$2 per kg, per DOE. Natural gas at $1–$2 per MMBtu and CCS costs of $50–$100 per ton CO2 keep it competitive, especially with 45Q credits ($60–$180 per ton), per BloombergNEF. Retrofitting plants, like ExxonMobil’s Baytown, costs $50–$100 million per facility, but leverages 1.5 million miles of pipelines, minimizing transport costs ($0.50–$1 per kg). Challenges include methane leakage, adding $0.20–$0.50 per kg in high-emission regions like the Permian, per Nature Energy, and post-2026 credit uncertainty, risking $10–$20 billion in investments.

Methane pyrolysis matches SMR at $1–$2 per kg, per C2ES. Energy costs for high-temperature processes are offset by carbon black sales ($500–$1,000 per ton), per DataHorizon Research. Monolith’s Nebraska plant, with $1 billion in capex, shows scale challenges, as modular designs cost $10–$20 million per 10 MW unit, per IEA. Using renewable electricity at $30–$50 per MWh keeps CI low, but gas-based pyrolysis raises emissions, adding $0.10–$0.30 per kg. Carbon market volatility is a risk, requiring long-term offtake agreements.

Natural hydrogen is the cheapest at $0.50–$1 per kg, per DOE. Drilling wells costs $10–$50 million, far less than electrolysis or SMR plants, per Koloma. No processing means minimal operational costs, but exploratory risks—uncertain purity and flow rates—require $5–$10 million in R&D per site, per IEA. Limited deposits cap economic scale, with $1–$2 billion needed for 0.5–1 million tons annually by 2035, per BloombergNEF.

Nuclear hydrogen costs $2–$4 per kg, using off-peak power at $20–$40 per MWh, per DOE. Electrolyzers cost $20–$30 million for 25 MW, with nuclear’s high fixed costs ($80–$100 per MWh) adding pressure, per BloombergNEF. H.R.1’s 45V credit (up to $3 per kg, pre-2026) bridges the gap, but its January 1, 2026, deadline threatens $5–$10 billion in projects, per IEA. Co-locating electrolyzers avoids $5–$10 million in grid balancing costs, but limited excess capacity (10–20 GW) caps output.

Economically, natural hydrogen leads, followed by SMR with CCS and pyrolysis, with nuclear trailing due to capex and policy risks. Derivatives are where these costs pay off.

Hydrogen’s value shines in derivatives like low-CI ammonia and sustainable aviation fuel, which drive demand and justify production costs. Let’s explore how these technologies fuel high-value markets.

Low-CI ammonia, used for fertilizers and shipping, is a $200 billion market, consuming 23.56% of U.S. hydrogen in 2024, per Grand View Research. By 2035, it’ll need 7–8 million tons of hydrogen, per TechEnergy Ventures. SMR with CCS, at $1–$2 per kg, produces ammonia at $500–$700 per ton, competitive with hydrocarbon-based ammonia ($400–$600 per ton) thanks to 45Q credits, per IEA. CF Industries’ Donaldsonville plant in Louisiana uses SMR with CCS for 1 million tons annually, meeting strict CI standards (0.5–1 kg CO2e per kg H2). Methane pyrolysis, at $1–$2 per kg, supports ammonia in Nebraska’s Monolith pilot, leveraging carbon byproducts. Natural hydrogen’s $0.50–$1 per kg enables ultra-low-CI ammonia in Kansas, ideal for Midwest fertilizer plants. Nuclear hydrogen, at $2–$4 per kg, powers ammonia in Illinois, targeting Chicago’s agricultural markets, per McKinsey.

Sustainable aviation fuel, a $1 trillion market by 2050, demands 1–2 million tons of hydrogen by 2035, per IEA. SAF, meeting CORSIA’s 70% emissions reduction, costs $1,500–$2,000 per ton with hydrogen at $2–$4 per kg, per BloombergNEF. Nuclear hydrogen’s 0.1–0.5 kg CO2e per kg makes it ideal for SAF in New York, serving Northeast airports, per DOE. Natural hydrogen’s near-zero CI supports SAF in Kansas, near aviation hubs like Dallas. SMR with CCS fuels SAF in Texas, with ExxonMobil’s Baytown targeting 500,000 tons annually, per McKinsey. Pyrolysis, with 1.5 kg CO2e per kg, is viable for SAF in Pennsylvania, but carbon offtake is critical.

These derivatives amplify hydrogen’s impact. Ammonia leverages SMR’s scale and natural hydrogen’s cost, while SAF demands nuclear and natural hydrogen’s low CI. Together, they drive a $400 billion market by 2035, per Grand View Research.

SMR with CCS, methane pyrolysis, natural hydrogen, and nuclear hydrogen are the technological pillars of the U.S. hydrogen economy. Economically, natural hydrogen’s $0.50–$1 per kg leads, followed by SMR and pyrolysis at $1–$2, with nuclear at $2–$4. Derivatives like ammonia and SAF, fueled by these technologies, unlock $200–$1 trillion markets, meeting decarbonization goals. Stay tuned for Part 2, where we’ll explore where this happens and how the market unfolds. I’m Paul Rodden, and this is The Hydrogen Podcast—see you next time!

Alright, that’s it for me, everyone.  If you have a second, I would really appreciate it if you could leave a good review on whatever platform you listen to. Apple podcasts, Spotify, Google, YouTube, etc. That would be a tremendous help to the show. And as always if you ever have any feedback, you are welcome to email me directly at info@thehydrogepodcast.com. So until next time, keep your eyes up and honor one another.