Unpacking the Case - Real Estate Law Podcast

Covenants, & Commonhold: Your Property Law Questions Answered

Davitt Jones Bould

Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.

0:00 | 23:55

In this episode, hosts Richard and Lizzie answer some of our audiences’ questions from our webinar on Restrictive Covenants, Positive Covenants and Commonhold. Richard covers restrictive and positive covenants enforcement, disputes, and the future of commonhold.

Drawing on scenarios faced by developers, surveyors, and other property professionals, we explore what actually happens when covenants are breached, how enforceability works in practice, and where the law still leaves uncertainty.

We also look ahead to commonhold reform and what it could mean for ownership structures, service charges, and long-term development strategy.

A must-listen for anyone working in commercial property, planning, or real estate development.

Relevant cases:
Tulk v Moxhay (1848)
Austerberry v Corporation of Oldham (1885)
Kelly v Barrett [1924]
Wall v Collins [2007]
Crest Nicholson Regeneration Ltd v Calvert [2026]
Cosmichome Ltd v Southampton City Council [2013]
Gafford v Graham and another [1999]
Birdlip v Hunter [2016]


Get in touch!

Training & Free Webinars for Property Professionals:

Would you like to keep up to date with the latest in real estate law? Davitt Jones Bould offers legal training tailored to your organisation’s needs, delivered in person across the UK or remotely. We also run free monthly webinars through for surveyors, solicitors, and property professionals across sectors. To sign up or learn more, visit our events page here or email djb.events@djblaw.co.uk for information and booking. 

 

This podcast is for informational purposes only and is not intended to provide legal or professional advice. No liability is accepted by Davitt Jones Bould for any reliance placed on its content.

 

Get in touch!

Podcasts we love

Check out these other fine podcasts recommended by us, not an algorithm.