Why the WHITE man wants to KILL Ibrahim Traore Part II -- Freedom or Death!

The White man has declared WAR on not just Burkina Faso but on Afrika with his negative attacks on Ibrahim Traore.  Captain Ibrahim Traore's revolutionary leadership has become a beacon of hope for the continent. This remarkable leader has implemented comprehensive development programs that directly challenge the Western model of African dependency, making him a prime target for White Supremacists.

What makes Traore so dangerous to Western interests is his rapid transformation of Burkina Faso through industrialization and self-sufficiency programs. In just three years, Traore has established electric car manufacturing, three tomato processing factories, mechanized agriculture systems, a comprehensive road building program, and even launched Air Burkina with a fleet of planes. These achievements that inspire hope is a direct threat to Western hegemony in Afrika, hence the declaration of war to remove Traore and why the issue at stake is FREEDOM OR DEATH!!

This notion of Freedom or Death is highlighted by Howard Nicholas, a European economics professor, who stated in a viral presentation, "the West WILL never allow Africa to industrialize or develop, because if they did, that would destroy the way of life in the West." This revealing statement exposes the true motivation behind Western intervention in Africa - not to help develop the continent, but to maintain access to its resources while preventing the emergence of competitive industrial powers.

The strategic importance of African resources cannot be overstated. The continent holds critical minerals including gold, diamonds, titanium, and lithium - the latter being essential for renewable energy technologies and electric vehicles. Without these resources, Western economies would collapse, as former French presidents Jacques Chirac and François Mitterrand acknowledged when they admitted that without Africa, France would be a "third-rate power." This dependency explains why Western powers consistently undermine African leaders who attempt to process raw materials domestically instead of exporting them cheaply.

The podcast employs Malcolm X's powerful metaphor of "house niggers" versus "field niggers" to differentiate between African leaders who serve Western interests and those who challenge them. House niggers - described as leaders like Paul Biya in Cameroon, Teodoro Obiang in Equatorial Guinea, and others - receive Western support as long as they provide access to resources while maintaining the status quo. Field niggers like Traore represent true resistance, threatening Western control by demonstrating that African nations can determine their own destiny.

Chapters

• 0:00 Introduction and Recap
• 2:16 Freedom vs Death for Africa
• 6:01 Nkrumah's Legacy and Western Interference
• 10:23 Ibn Choury's Revolutionary Developments
• 15:12 House vs Field: African Leadership Divide
• 21:32 The Consequences of Assassinating Choury
• 31:11 Concluding Thoughts and Next Episode

Transcript

Speaker 1: 0:03

Good evening and welcome to this week's edition of Africa in Focus. Myself Kwame, ghanaian writer, journalist, broadcaster, podcaster and entrepreneur. And in this week's episode of Africa in Focus, it's part two why the white man wants to kill Ibn Choray Freedom or death. So that's this week's edition of African Focus a part two of why the white man wants to kill Ibn Choray Freedom or death. So we've had a massive response from part one. I think it's been one of the all-time podcasts for the first week. So we had a massive response. So thank you to all those of you who listened in to part one of why the white man wants to kill Captain Ibrahim Choury. Before you get into the podcast, please subscribe. So if you haven't subscribed to Ghana African Focus, please do. We are on YouTube. We want to get at least 100 subscribers by the end of the year. So look out for Ghana African Focus on YouTube. Hit the notification bell, meaning that every time we upload a new podcast, youtube will notify you of it. Similarly, follow me on Spotify. We upload a new podcast, youtube will notify you of it. Similarly, follow me on Spotify. Just look out for Ghana, Africa and folks on Spotify. Hit the follow button, meaning that Spotify will notify you every time we upload a new podcast. So want to get at least try to get 800 to 1000 followers by the end of the year. We're nearly on 600, so thank you to all those who have subscribed to Ghana African Fakes on Spotify.

Speaker 1: 1:52

Okay, so let's get into this week's podcast why the white man wants to kill Ibram Chowdhury. Part 2 freedom or death. So why is it freedom or death? So why is it freedom or death and why this is such a pivotal moment in African history? This is about Ibn Cholwit, and he's the white man that wants to kill him. He's not a China man, he's not an Arab man, he's not a Muslim man, he's not the you know, indian man. He's the white man, white man, white man who wants to kill Ibn Chowdhury and, like I said, he will use African people, people that look like you and I, africans to kill Ibn Chowdhury. So, as I mentioned last week, right, this is a very, very important issue because, like I said, it's about freedom or death. I'm going to go into detail what I mean by freedom or death, and so what we see in burkina faso, mali and niger yeah, but more so burkina faso is that it's not just about those three countries. It's about Africa. So take out Burkina Faso in the news right now, along with Niger and Mali, and to the Greece and the Gaul.

Speaker 1: 3:17

This is about African sovereignty, african freedom. Freedom from what you may say Well, freedom from white supremacy, white terrorism and white domination that has inflicted so much pain and hardship on the African continent for at least 1,000 years. So, from enslavement to colonialism to neocolonialism, white supremacy, white terrorism, white domination has inflicted so much pain on entrepreneurs in Africa. And the reason why I say it's freedom is because that, as African people, as our nations, we have a right to be free to determine our sovereignty, determine our self-determination and, more importantly, determine our destiny. And so the white man does not want Africa to be free, because if Africa is free, they will suffer. Why would they suffer?

Speaker 1: 4:27

Well, put it this way, one European or white professor of economics called Howard Nicholas. He did a presentation that went viral about a few years ago and that presentation was about development or underdevelopment in Africa, which I'll put one day on on on. We should talk about one day on on this on this um podcast. But in that, uh, youtube presentation he said a very, very profound thing. He said that the West, so the white man, would never allow Africa to industrialise or develop, because if they did, yeah, if Africa was to industrialise and develop, that would destroy the culture of life in the West and also in Asia. And so they will fight by any means necessary to ensure that no African country ever gets a position where it develops and industrialism to an extent, because if it does, it's game over for them. Game over for them in terms of their culture of life, in terms of that material and in terms of, you know, keeping you know, virtually the white man's survival.

Speaker 1: 6:01

This is why, before going on to Troy, this is why Kwame Nkrumah of Ghana got removed, because Kwame Nkrumah was not talking just about Ghana. His vision was for the United States of Africa, and so what Nkrumah did was like a showcase of what the black man, the African man, is capable of doing. Yeah, and Nkrumah said this right. We will show to the world that, given the chance that the African or the black man is capable of managing his own affairs, and Nkrumah did this. In less than nine years, nkrumah built more than 400 state factories that met every need of the Ghanaian. Yeah, and in Nkrumah, ghana had a car factory, and in Nkrumah, ghana had a national airline carrier, ghana Airways. And in Nkrumah, ghana was developing atomic energy right, for renewable energy purposes. And in Nkrumah, ghana had a comprehensive road network program that it was doing, spearheaded by the Accra Tower Motorway that was built in 1961, two years before Britain's M1. And in Krumah, ghana, you know, had a gold factory that was near completion. And in Nkrumah, ghana became a net exporter of food because Nkrumah invested heavily in agriculture, yeah, and in Nkrumah, ghana had a rapid industrialization program.

Speaker 1: 7:42

So, because Nkrumah was doing this for Ghana, the West, or the white man, said that if we don't stop Nkrumah, this model or the example of African accents that Nkrumah is doing right, it could spread out wide, far, to other African, african countries. And if it did, we are stuck because, like I said last week, right, former former French presidents Jack Chirac and François Mitterrand both said that essentially, without Africa, france would be a federal country. So just imagine, without Africa, the West would be nothing. So, contrary to what you read in your Western press, contrary to what you think you know about Africa, contrary to what you've been told about Africa, right, the truth of the matter is right. The whole world, not just the West, but India, china and whoever, they cannot function without African raw materials, because our raw materials are gold and diamonds, titanium and now lithium the nuclear is in the block lithium particularly used for electric vehicles, ev. Yeah. And these also um battery, long life battery, yeah, the solar, the solar power batteries. And and these other lithium type batteries that are using, you know, cordless lawnmowers, you know cordless uhers, etc. Made of lithium ore that is found in places like Ghana and the Congo. So we've got these raw materials, we've got African raw materials right. India, china, the West is nothing, because they all need African raw materials for their survival.

Speaker 1: 9:25

And this is why Nkrumah had to be with me, because Nkrumah was showing the way, nkrumah was showing the template. And, by the way, nkrumah was inspired by the great African Jamaican, marcus Mazai Garvey yeah, and if you get opportunity, go and read the book that inspired Nkrumah the Philosophy and Opinions of Marcus Mazai Garvey. So Nkrumah's template was actually a Garveyite template that Nkrumah used to good effect. And so because Nkrumah used this model of development right that posed a serious threat to the West, added to the unification of Africa that Nkrumah wanted. This is why Nkrumah had to be taken out and we see this history putting itself with Ibn Churay.

Speaker 1: 10:15

So, ibn Churay, I didn't get into it deep last week, but what Ibn Churay is doing in Burkina Faso is revolutionary. Just to give you some examples of what Ibn Churay is doing in Burkina Faso is revolutionary, just to give you some examples of what Ibn Chirou is doing in Burkina Faso. So he's actually en route on the way to redesign or recarburate. You know a comprehensive road building programme in Burkina Faso just last year. Yeah, under Ibn Choy's leadership right, burkina Faso was probably the first African country to produce an electric car. Yeah, and by producing an electric car, it's part of the wider industrialisation programme that Captain Ibn Choy has embarked upon in terms of rapidly industrialising Burkina Faso.

Speaker 1: 11:20

Also, he's revolutionary mechanised agriculture, so he understands that a people needs to feed themselves. If they can't feed themselves, the people will die, and so, on the leadership right, he has invested heavily in revolutionary mechanised agricultural methods to make Burkina Faso food secure. And on that, you know, he's opened you know, three tomato factories. Yeah, because tomato is a big export earner for Burkina Faso. Yeah, so it's developed three tomato factories whereby, you know, they're using the raw material, tomato, to make tomato paste. And if you know anything about African food. In African food we use a lot of tomato paste, yeah, for jollof rice, for our stews, for our soups, etc. Etc. So you know tomato paste is a big thing on the African continent and you know Ibn Chowdhury is investing heavily in these tomato factories again, you know, under Ibn Chowdhury's leadership right, there's now Air Burkina.

Speaker 1: 12:34

He bought a fleet of planes, yeah, to again create employment for his people, to invest in his people by pilots, air stewardess, air hostesses, you know, air management, etc. Etc. To revolutionise Burkina Faso's aviation industry. So these are some of the fantastic work that Captain Ibn Chow is doing as a model of development in Burkina Faso that other African countries could use as an example. And also we see this going on in Mali and in Niger, yeah, but we don't know too much of those developmental programmes that are going on because the leaders haven't been open, unlike Ibn Chowdhury, as to what they are doing. But we know that there's a lot of development, you know, within Mali and Niger. And so you know Captain Ibn Chowdhury is putting a lot of African leaders to shame because within three years, he's done what I've just told you and a lot, lot more than he's done, and so this is sending shockwaves for the Western world because, like Nkrumah, if they didn't take out Ibn Chowdhury, this example of what he's doing could spread like wildfire to other African countries and that would definitely jeopardise their stronger hold on the African continent that they've had for more than you know, 400 years, from enslavement through to the uh you know the Berlin congress of 1884-85, where they divided Africa like a pizza through to uh you know colonialism, through today to neocolonialism, where we have African leaders, or rather European project managers, disguised as African leaders but doing the aiding and abetting of the white man. So, like I mentioned last week, paul Beyer example of that Paul Beyer in Cameroon, theodore Obiang in Equatorial Guinea, alassane Matara in La Côte, d'ivoire, paul Kagame in Rwanda, yueri Museveni in Uganda, william Ruto in Kenya, etc.

Speaker 1: 15:12

These are, as Malcolm X said, the house niggers. So Malcolm X, the great late Malcolm X, whose 100th anniversary of his birth is this year, malcolm X said this the house nigger and the field nigger. So the field nigger was the one who was on the plantations doing the work and ensuring that Master survives and that the cane or the plantation is sufficient, and they were also the ones who were rebellious. You know, the field niggas, the house niggas. Now. They were the ones who had been appeased by the white slave master and they were in the house eating a circle of good food, looking after the mother's kids and etc. Etc. And they didn't want to go into the field because they were happy, they were satisfied being under the rule of the white slave master.

Speaker 1: 16:21

So same way, today we have these African leads I've just mentioned who are happy being dictated to by the West. So, as long as they play ball, you know, ie give the West raw materials for charge or very, very cheaply. You know they done give the West raw materials for charge or very, very cheaply. You know they don't go against the grain, they don't do things controversially, they don't say anything controversial. Then, you know, the white men will leave them alone. Those are the house niggers, right.

Speaker 1: 16:49

The third nigger is Ibram Chowdhury, who is out the grain, who is prepared to put his life on the line in order to develop his country and, by extension, mum Africa. And this is why you saw last John, last week, on April, the 30th, yeah, the worldwide global African Day of Action to protest against the West's attempts to kill Ibn Churi. So, like I said, the demonstrations in Ouagadougou, in Accra, in London, in Paris, in Berlin, in Kingston, jamaica, in some cities in America, all over the African world. Right, there were demonstrations warning the West that, as right-minded think Africans, we will not tolerate the assassination of Captain Ibrahim Chouhri. So this is what I'm saying it is a matter of freedom or death.

Speaker 1: 17:55

So what Ibrahim Chouy represents and Mali and Niger also, but what they present is freedom Freedom from Western imperialism, freedom from white supremacy, freedom from Western domination, freedom from Western terrorism and the right to self-determine their destiny. The right to trade with whoever they want to trade, the right to have policies and programmes that are for the people and that are in the interest of the people, not in the interest of the people, not the interest of a Western elite or Western multi-national companies. Three to make decisions for yourself that will benefit the people. Yeah. So what Ibn Chowdhury represents is freedom from that kind of white people. Yeah. So what Ibn Chowri represents is freedom from that kind of white domination. Yeah, but like I said last week, african emancipation is anti-white supremacy, white supremacy is anti-African emancipation.

Speaker 1: 19:12

And so, like I said, the white man has never wanted Africa to be free, let alone develop. All that they're concerned about is Africa being where it is being named, the hero of wood and jewel of water. That all Africa should do, right, is just produce these raw materials and not add value to it. But they will add value to it, and you know, getting dirt cheap these raw materials that they can use for their industrial complex. And they've never wanted Africa to develop. So these so called developmental programmes in Africa, right, ask yourself all these Western NGOs that have come to Africa in the last 25, 30, 40 years with their so-called developmental programmes, these so-called NGOs, right, you tell me, what development have they brought to it? What really transformation development have they brought to an African country? None whatsoever. Showing you, right, that the West is not interested in African development.

Speaker 1: 20:19

Because if Africa develops, you ain't going to get immigrants wanting to leave Africa and come to Europe. If Africa develops, right, you know, you won't get people wanting to come to the West, particularly America or UK, and seek asylum. Yeah, and by the West, particularly America or UK, and seek asylum, yeah. And, by the way, they need immigration because the West yeah, you know, germany, britain, france, spain, italy, portugal, etc. Right, is experiencing negative population growth. What do I mean by that? So, for one death, none is born. Yeah, so for everywhere, every white person that dies, they can't replace that person that dies. But in africa, for every one person that dies, three is born or even four is born. Yeah, so if.

Speaker 1: 21:15

And they talk about immigration as if, as if they need it and as if it's some kind of arbitrage on their neck. But Europe, like I said, is experiencing population decline, population in a lot of European countries UK, france, Italy, germany, portugal, you know, poland, russia, all these European countries, right, have Asian populations, yeah, and so they need immigration to do the jobs that you know Asian population can't do or some, you know, british or German or French people don't want to do. Yeah, so they need immigration. So if Africa was to develop, if they would allow Africa to develop right, africans wouldn't bother to, you know, wouldn't risk their lives, you know, fighting to get across the Sahara and fighting to get across the Sahara and then fighting to get from North Africa to the coast areas of Europe to seek a so-called better life. It wouldn't be like that, because Africa has everything, you know great food, great climate, all the raw materials that are needed to industrialise, etc. Nobody in their right mind would want to leave Africa, and so this is why they want to keep Africa down. This is why they have no intention of allowing any African country to develop and particularly industrialise, because if they do, like I said, it's game over for the white man. So this is why what Ibn Chowdhury is doing in Burkina Faso away for the white man. So this is why what Ibn Choway is doing in Burkina Faso is larger than Burkina Faso and it's like I say it's not just about Burkina Faso, it's about Africa. Because if the white man kills Ibn Choway, then you could say it's game over for another probably 20, 30 years.

Speaker 1: 23:15

Yeah, because the same way that they killed Nkrumah or they ousted Nkrumah in that coup in 1966, that curtailed not just Ghana's development but also Africa's development by a good 30, 40 years and that put fear into the people. Nkrumah's removal put fear in his contemporaries at the time. So they knew that if they were ever to do what Nkrumah did right, they would suffer the same fate as Nkrumah. So if the white man is successful, yeah, in killing Ibn Choray, that is death not just for Burkina Faso but the whole of Africa, because that will put fear again, like in Ndezi Bin Khouryma. That will put fear in this current generation of African leaders who want to do the right thing and develop and design their countries. So they will not doing that and that's why I say death.

Speaker 1: 24:25

But before I go deep into death, right, I just want to end on freedom, okay, and what it means to be free. Like I said, many of us don't really appreciate what it means to be free. And we're not free Just because you have a national anthem on the flag. You're not free, beloved. We're still under white control. Yeah, white tyranny, white domination, yeah. And this is why it's so important for Ibn Choy to succeed, because this dynamism, moving away from Western influence, western control, western manipulation, is freedom, and for them to do what we want when we want, support us, buy us. That's in our interest and the interest of the African continent.

Speaker 1: 25:21

So let's now touch on to death. So should Ibn Choy be killed by the white man and his cohorts, that will kill. That will potentially kill Burkina Faso. The strides that Burkina Faso is making right now to industrialise, to become a self-sufficient country, to become food secure, to become a modern, industrialized country, that could die if Ibn Chowdhury is murdered by the white man. Again, this death of Ibn Chowdhury would signify death of Africa, because many African countries, these so-called leaders, even those like Mali and Niger, who are now on the same page as Troy, they may get scared. They think that they could be next. So, rather than be pan-Africanists in their outlook, they may turn more authoritarian right and begin to do what the white man tells them to do, and this will signify death.

Speaker 1: 26:35

And we cannot afford death. As African people, african continent, we cannot afford, you know, for Ibn Chowdhury not to succeed Because death, or rather freedom, is better than death. Death is that's it, because death. Death does not allow you to become independent. Death does not allow you to become independent. Death does not allow you to become a critical thinker, death does not allow you to take your destiny into your own hands. Death does not allow you to do what's in the interest of your people.

Speaker 1: 27:20

And it's something that we, as a global African community, cannot countenance, that the killing of another progressive African leader that will lead to the death of our development, our industrialization and, more importantly, our not desire but our right to take charge of our own affairs and to self-determine our own destiny as a people. So this is why we must support Ibn Chure and we must warn the West that we will never allow you to take out Ibn Chure, because we know of the dire consequences that potentially could happen if they were successful in taking out Captain Ibn Churi. And these consequences will have severe repercussions, not just Africa, mind you. You know they may think that if they kill Ibn Choway it could have repercussions not in Burkina Faso and other African countries, but you know it will also have repercussions. See, in Europe, as a result, potentially, of the destabilization of South African countries will be a massive wave of immigration from Africa to the West. And these people mean business. Once they destroyed the African dream, they will now take it upon themselves by enemies necessary to come to Europe. And it doesn't matter what policy you've got, what army you've got, whatever, these people will find a way to come to Europe.

Speaker 1: 29:15

And so Europe and the West, it's in your interest, believe it or not, to leave Ibn Choway alone. Why? Because if you do, africans are not going to leave Africa and come and swamp Europe, as some of your populist rat ring parties are already talking about. We see populism taking its way all over Europe, with Maloney in Italy, the AFD in Germany, the Front National in France, even in Britain just over a week, the local elections, reform UK won more than 600 council seats where they had none before, where they had none before. So right-wing populism, spearheaded by the fear of immigration, the fear of a black and brown Europe, is why you must leave Ibn Chowri alone, because if you don't, it could have severe implications for you that you cannot countenance and you would definitely not stop. And so this is what I mean by death.

Speaker 1: 30:26

Yeah, if the white man was successful in using one of our own to destroy ibn churi and on that there was a pathetic, um, you know, uh comment or statement by the house nigger, african American head of AFICOM, which is the American so called AFICOM African High Command, said that Ibn Chowdhury is stealing from the country. Ibn Chowdhury is living like a dictator. Ibn Chowdhury, is this Ibn Churay? Is um living like a dictator? Ibn Churay, is this Ibn Churay? Is that? That's the same game, the same game that they did with Nkrumah, lumumba and Kandahar, to mention a few.

Speaker 1: 31:15

And I'm saying to our people right, do not fall for that propaganda, do not allow these people, these house niggers and the white man to fool us, to make us hate Ibn Choy to such an extent that we'll fall for their bait and end up killing this man because, like I said, if Ibn Choy is murdered, we've lost our freedom, the right to determine ourselves, the right to determine ourselves, the right to determine our own destiny and death, in that we are being slaves. Yeah to western domination, white supremacy and white stronghold in African continent. And so I thank you for listening to this part two of Ibn Churri, why the white man wants to, of Ibn Choway, why the White man Wants to Kill Ibn Choway. Freedom or Death.

Speaker 1: 32:12

And if you like what you hear, please share to your friends, family, social media networks. Subscribe to Ghana African Focus on YouTube, subscribe to Ghana African Focus on Spotify and, you know, tell your friends and family about this fantastic podcast, ghana African Focus. And so until next week, where we have a podcast coming from Ghana, that Ghana is not cheap but expensive, particularly if you want to live a Western lifestyle. We're breaking down that. So until next week, from myself, kwame, and from all the crew here on Africa In Focus it's. Thank you very much for listening and we see you next week for some Ghana In Focus.