The Pushback Against Totalitarianism is Underway!

First, thirteen New Jersey municipalities have openly defied state laws by refunding gun license fees back to the People!! Amazing!!

Then, attempt number three is underway in Florida to remove government infringements of the right of 18-29-year-olds to purchase firearms, and sadly, "Republicans" are the ones standing in the way.

Last, the Yukon government is pushing back against Ottawa's demands that they enforce federal gun control laws, but Yukon officials said they will not participate in the federal mandatory firearms buyback program. Winning!!

Freedom Guns
Firearms, Ammunition, Accessories, Training classes

The Gun Site
9-Lane 25 yard indoor Shooting Range, Gun Store, Training classes

WJS Guns
Gun and Outdoor Shop, ammo, accessories, fishing tackle, more

Sicarios Gun Shop
Firearms, Accessories, Ammo, Safes, and more!

Glover Orndorf and Flanagan Wealth Mgmt.
Wealth management services

SHOOTINGCLASSES.COM
Online business operations platform for firearms instructors, trainees, and Shooting Ranges

Counter Strike Tactical
Best Little Gun Store in Melbourne, Florida! Veteran Owned and Operated 321-499-4949

Control Jiu-Jitsu/MMA
Jiu-Jitsu/MMA Training in Melbourne, FL

Ear Care of Melbourne
Need hearing aids? Go to the audiologists that gave Royce his hearing back!

Go2 Weapons
Manufacturers of AR platform rifles for military and civilian. Veteran Owned and Operated

Disclaimer: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase, I may receive a commission at no extra cost to you.

Transcript

THIS TRANSCRIPT WAS GENERATED ELECTRONICALLY AND MAY NOT BE EXACTLY WORD-FOR-WORD ACCURATE OR GRAMMATICALLY CORRECT. WE APOLOGIZE IN ADVANCE FOR ANY IRREGULARITIES AND/OR MISTAKES.

Freedom Guns is your local gun store for the Rockledge-Cocoa area in Brevard County,
Florida. Stop in and meet Mike and the gang and see the great deals they have on
long guns, handguns, accessories, ammunition, AR build kits,
and Liberty Safes that come with free delivery and installation. They're located at 1
-255 Florida Avenue just north of Rockledge High School. For more information,
check them out at freedom dashguns .com. Tell them you heard about them on the
Shooting Straight Radio podcast.
The gun site in Merritt Island is your one -stop shop for all of your Second
Amendment needs. Stop out there and see my friend Steve Kennedy and check out his
nine -lane 25 -yard indoor shooting range. He's got handgun rentals galore out there.
If you want to try it before you buy it, the gun site in Merritt Island is where
you need to go. Also, he's got a great selection of ammunition, accessories, range
bags, you name it, you'll find it out there at 125 South Banana River Drive in
Merritt Island. Check him out at gunsiterange .com. Make sure you tell
Roy's Bartlett, the keeper in the bearer of truth we know.
Facts about the Second Amendment. And never, ever forget that all gun control laws
are nothing less than an overt acts of aggression against the American people and
their rights. Exercise your rights in a safe way. Stupidity, the thing that someone
hell -bent on violating the law against murder will magically be stopped by a gun
control law. Politicians that infringe on our God given rights he calls them out
he's not here to play so turn it on to the end,
crank it up Royce Bartlett and the shooting straight show let's go let's go
welcome to the shooting straight radio podcast we are locked loaded and we are loud
we've got a lot to talk about today as usual and we're going to get right into
that in just a minute first i want to remind you. You can follow this program on
social media, on Farsbook. I know it's Facebook and Instagram and give it a like
and a share if you would. And I sure would appreciate that. Sometimes I post the
links to all the episodes there, but they're selected episodes. If you want to get
all the episodes, follow on IHeart, Spotify, or any of the major podcast platforms
out there. It is on that platform, I guarantee you. If you want to reach out to
me, Shooting Straight Radio podcast at gmail .com or Shooting Straight Radio Show at
gmail .com, and I always respond, so hit me up. Also, the links to all my sponsors
are on every episode page. Scroll down, click on the link, see their goods and
services, and make sure you tell them you heard about them on the Shooting Straight
Radio podcast. Also, in Florida, don't you forget, all guns and ammo are sales tax
-free until the end of the month and until the new year. So get down to see my
sponsors. Most of the gun stores in Brevard County sponsor my program.
So check them out. Check out their address. You can go out to North Melbourne at
Sicario's gun shop in Melbourne down at Counterstrike Tactical, Rock Ledge at Freedom
Guns, Merritt Island, East Merritt Island at the gun site, North Merritt Island,
WJS Guns, and let's see who else did I leave out there? Hopefully not too many.
Also check out go -to weapons. They're a sponsor of this program. And make sure you
tell them you heard about them on the program, and I sure would appreciate that.
All right, I don't think I have to tell you that Islamofascists are stepping up
their violence. They did so in Australia yesterday. They also did so at Brown
University here in the U .S. The shooter there hollered out, Allaho Akbar,
before he began to kill people. And I warned you, I'm telling you, it's going to
get worse than this. That's just a precursor. Those are just little small fires.
The larger fires are coming. Don't doubt me on this. Well, matter of fact, don't
not doubt me. Don't doubt Sarah Superbad Adams and the information she's been giving
us about the terrorists that are here and the massive attack and assault that they
are planning on the United States that is going to dwarf in terms of victims 9 -11
2001. So, again, I'm going to remind you here and now, stock up on beans,
bullets, and band -aids, and you have no excuse for not being ready. You will only
have yourself to blame, and no one is required to come and save you. And that's
good because nobody's going to come save you because you chose not to be able to
defend yourself, and you didn't stock up on ammo. You didn't stock up on canned
goods and beans and everything like that. You didn't stock up on trauma supplies,
and you're going to get caught flat -footed. That's going to be your fault. Not
mine, not anybody else's. You've been warned about it repeatedly on this program.
You've been warned about it on many other platforms and programs, So you have no
excuse. You better get ready. All right. Now, let's sweep that aside for a minute.
And let's talk about something that has gone right. I know it's shocking that in
the world of the Second Amendment advocacy, that something actually goes right, but
something is going right. And there is some pushback coming in many municipalities
here in the U .S. and in Canada even, and they are pushing back against gun control
requirements, and I am very heartened to see this. I really am.
I'm going to be referencing a story, a story by Brian Burns,
the title of which is Permit Revolt. Twelve New Jersey towns rebel against state gun
fees, and they approved
if you heard me crow about New Jersey and how they're one of the communist occupied
territories, well, you know, I might have to eat some of my words because these are
the municipalities themselves that, according to their city council,
said, you know what, this isn't right. We're giving these fees back because we don't
have any right to collect them. Wow, doesn't that blow your brain. You just,
you would never expect that in a million years. But it does prove something,
number one, it proves your host wrong to a certain degree. It also proves that
there are some constitutionally sensible people sitting on some of these city
governments in some of these municipalities in New Jersey. So let's read the article
here by Brian Burns.
A quiet pushback against state -mandated gun fees is gaining ground in New Jersey,
where a dozen municipalities have now moved to nullify or refund costs associated
with carrying a firearm. As the Tampa Free Press reported last week,
Howell, New Jersey, became the latest town to join the effort on November 25th.
The movement, described by organizers as a grassroots revolt, and those are the best
kind, is a coordinated response to state laws passed following the U .S.
Supreme Court's Bruin decision. After the Bruin ruling expanded carry rights,
no, it didn't. Come on, people. All it did was take the cuffs off the right,
cuffs that had no right to go on the right in the first place and the free
exercise thereof. But anyway, for the sake of the article, after the Bruin ruling
expanded carry rights, New Jersey lawmakers added new financial hurdles to the
permitting process, including a $50 fee for a victim's compensation fund,
and a $150 fee directed to local municipalities. This is galling,
number one, that you would charge anybody in your state a fee so that you could
take that money and create a victim compensation fund. Now, I'm not going to go too
deep in these weeds, but I got a feeling that victim's compensation fund was just
another intake for Democrat money. Yeah, a clearinghouse for Democrat money.
But anyway, who are you to tell law -abiding gun owners that they must pay into a
victim's compensation fund when they have created no victims? And they have no plans
to create victims. Yes, we the people are not the government. We don't create
victims. No, we defend victims, and we don't allow ourselves to become victims
either. So that's pretty galling that they would charge something like that.
But then there was a $150 fee directed to local municipalities. A fee for what?
What exactly is that $100, I'm sorry, $150 fee for? I mean,
don't you just love the whimsical nature of these fees?
Howell, the city of Howell, followed suit last month with the town council voting
unanimously, minus one absentee, to refund $125 of its portion.
This, like I said, this is giving me hope here. Apparently, there are some
constitutionally sensible people in these municipalities, at a minimum, they've got
some good sensibility about them and, you know, they understand what's fair and
what's not. Chairman Allen Gottlieb of the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep
and Bear Arms made this statement. He said, there are now a dozen municipalities in
the Garden State that have decided to respect the rights of their citizens by not
imposing onerous fees on them to exercise a constitutional right.
He credited the victories to collaboration between his organization, the New Jersey
firearms owner syndicate, and the NRA -I -L -A. Now,
the list of towns opting out of the fee collection now includes Beachwood,
Butler, Dumont, Franklin Borough, Hardiston, Hopat -K -K -O -P -A -T C -O -N -G,
it sounds like a Vietnamese village, Medford Lakes, Vernon, Creskill,
Reddington, Englishtown, and Howell. And now thank you to Henry out there in Tom's
River, New Jersey, for letting me know that your city and your town there,
whatever is Tom's River, a town or a city, I don't know, but they have now joined
the rank. So good on you, Henry. Hopefully you'll get your fees back there, brother,
and keep fighting the good fight there in New Jersey. I appreciate you and all you
do out there standing up for the Second Amendment, brother. Howell Councilman Ian
Nadell, who spearheaded the initiative in his municipality, framed the issue as a
defense of civil liberties. That's the best framework to put this in.
That's why I frame civilian disarmament cartels as anti -rights organizations.
And that's what I call them on social media. When I try to get them to engage in
a reasonable debate about gun control, and of course, they never engage,
probably because they know they get their butts handed to them on a silver platter.
But If you defend the right to keep and bear arms as a civil liberty,
because it is, and as a human right, because it is, well, that frames it in the
correct light because the gun control cartels frame their arguments in light of
possibilities. Well, if you have the gun, you might do something bad with it. Well,
then and we might not. Who are you to say that we must be disarmed based on
possibilities? Possibilities and probabilities are not the same thing.
So take that with you. But Howell Counselman Ian Nadell,
when he said, he said, the Second Amendment is the only amendment that seems to be
under repeated attack, especially in the state of New Jersey. Well, yep,
because that's true. advocates
you to all of you there in that state for standing up and fighting and making your
voices heard and being engaged in this battle for our civil rights,
for our constitutional rights. Now let's come on down here to my sunny home state
of Florida that's not so sunny this morning. It's a little dreary out and looks a
little wintry and got a nice brisk wind cutting right through us, But don't worry,
by 12 o 'clock, it'll be 90 degrees again. Here's an article from Ammo Land by Jose
Nino from December 5th. Florida House Committee advances bill to restore gun rights
for young adults. Well, good. They should have never been taken away. I mean,
they really never, they really didn't take the right away. They basically stood up
and imposed themselves between the right and 18 to 20 year olds and dared them
basically to try to exercise it because if they did, the state would come down on
them with both feet. That's exactly what gun control laws are. They don't really
take the exercise of your right away. They can't. They're not able to actually do
that. What they are able to do is intimidate you into not freely exercising it,
and they do that with a law, and to back up that law, they use the police.
Well, the police are called out from we the people. They should be our police,
not the state's police. No cop out there should ever be enforcing a gun control
law. I'm not going to get too deep in those weeds, but you've heard me talk about
that before. So here in Florida, they're trying to restore this again. And I don't
know if it's going to take another court case to, you know,
bring this back into sensibility. But, I mean, like open carry recently back in
September. But I tell you, this is, this is asinine that this ever took place in
the first place. Again, I have to ask, why is it that the actions of one demon
-infested little snot -wad punk and his murderous actions at a school,
in spite of the fact that he was on the FBI's radar, in spite of the fact he had
been arrested numerous times, in spite of the fact that he had been arrested for
actually pointing guns at his own family members, but yet was still according
the requisite catalyst for stripping the right of 18 to 20 -year -olds to purchase
firearms. Well, if you strip the right to purchase them, the only thing they're able
to rely on then is someone to gift them a firearm. Well, what if they don't have
anybody to do that for them? Well, then they're required to be defenseless victims
in waiting, and that's just all there is to it. They may not keep keeping bare
arms until they're 21 and there is no analogous precedent for such a thing in this
country but yet it happened and it happened because a bunch of vociferous scumbags
catterwalled and cried and weeped and wailed and went before the state legislature
and rode the emotional tidal wave to its degree and got the legislators to say,
okay, we got to do something. No, what you got to do legislators is uphold and
defend the Constitution like you swore an oath to do. And if you don't do that,
you should be booted out of office on your backside. That's what needs to happen.
But you don't get to say the actions of one little punk are a reasonable excuse
for a
therefore. Mm -hmm, yes, and that probably smells just like what it is.
A huge pile of pasture patties. Mm -hmm.
The Florida House Judiciary voted 13 to 7 on December 2, 2025,
to advance legislation that would restore the right of young adults to purchase
rifles and shotguns. This marked the fourth consecutive year, Republicans have
attempted to correct what gun rights advocates viewed as a constitutional infringement
committed in the panic following the Parkland shooting. House Bill 133 sponsored by
House Majority Leader, Tyler Soroy, would lower the minimum age for purchasing long
guns from 21 back to 18 years old. The measure now heads to the full House For
consideration with the 2026 legislative session begins on January 13th,
having cleared its final hurdle. Oh, the only problem with that is there's some
people standing in the way up there. In spite of the fact, there are many good
advocacy groups, gun owners of America, gun owners of Florida,
Florida Carrey, and others who have been fighting for this since 2018,
okay? Let me just bring this out. This has been in place since 2018.
Look how long this fight has been to get it back. This is why we need people to
simply stand up and say, we're not abiding by this law. And we need law enforcement
to stand up and say, we're not enforcing this law. That would nullify bad
legislation very quickly. If you want to see the power of such a collective mind
and voice, look at how Bulgaria recently ousted their useless government by simply
taking to the streets and saying, we're done with you, get out. And if you didn't
see the video for that, it was impressive. It was absolutely astounding to see that.
I wish we could see stuff like that going on here in the United States, especially
in places like New Jersey, New York City, Chicago and such, whenever they pass some
draconian gun control law. If we had started doing that back since 1934,
there would be no gun control laws that we would have to contend with at all. So
keep that in mind. This is why I talk about resolutions of noncompliance telling
them flat out, we know you passed a law and we know you went through the proper
channels to pass the law, but the law you passed is constitutionally repugnant and
therefore we refuse to abide by it and good luck enforcing that because we outgun
you. You're welcome. So for gun rights organizations like Florida gun rights,
this legislation represents an opportunity to roll back what they characterize as a
betrayal of constitutional principles, because it is, during a moment of political
weakness. And that's a very good way to put that, very succinctly put.
Florida gun rights wrote following the committee vote, they said this removes the
military age purchase ban of long guns that came from the egregious Parkland bill in
2018. While this is a victory, the Senate has refused to take it up for years.
The Senate in Tallahassee is treating the Second Amendment as a second -class right.
That's exactly what they're doing. And that should not stand on that basis alone.
The current law creates what supporters 3 -3 view as an obvious constitutional
inequity. Adults aged 18 to 20 can vote,
serve in the military, sign contracts, and legally possess firearms, if gifted to
them, they simply cannot purchase those same firearms for themselves.
Okay. So what do you do when you have some 18 -year -old student going away to
college and he or she is living off campus somewhere, they're not allowed to
purchase a firearm to defend themselves. And if their parents won't buy it for them,
they're pretty much sunk unless somebody, let's say, have a really good friend that
says, you know what, your birthday's right around a corner and I think you need a
gun. So come on, let's go down to the gun store. Let's pick you one out and I'd
like to buy it for you. That rarely happens, I assure you, no one's ever done it
for me. If you want to, shooting straight radio podcast at gmail .com, and I'll tell
you what kind of guns I like. Never mind. Anyway, state representative Jessica Baker
highlighted this contradiction during committee deliberations. And she said, right now
in Florida, a 19 -year -old can legally own a long gun if someone gives it to them,
but they cannot buy it for themselves. Mm -hmm, that's about the truth.
HB133 would restore purchasing rights for rifles and shotguns to adults in this age
group, though federal law would still require buyers to be 21 to purchase handguns
from licensed dealers. The bill would also allow 18 -year -olds to purchase pistols
from private sellers. Okay, what is the good of this thing in the first place then
if you're actually going to say, well, you can't do that, but here's an exception
to it. What are you saying? You're admitting in that case that your law that you
passed is bogus. 18 to 20 year olds to purchase pistols from private sellers since
current state law prohibits any firearm purchase for those under 21. this marks the
fourth consecutive year the Florida House has advanced such legislation the chamber
passed similar measures in 2023 and 2024 and during the 2025 session but each time
the so -called Republican Senate has refused to take up the bill well why did they
do that I got a funny feeling there's money involved.
Anytime you have a compromised Republican or any kind of compromised legislator,
there's usually money involved. Something tells me there's more than just domestic
money involved also. Something tells me there's some foreign money involved,
and I'm going to explain why in the second half of the program. because these age
limits to purchase, these are not just some, you know,
those were not some spur of the moment idea. That wasn't something that somebody
came up with after that horrid tragedy down there in Parkland. No, no, no,
no, no. These age limits to purchase and limits on how many guns you can purchase
and things like that those all have their root in an international what should I
say plan and I will be talking about that in the second half the committee vote
broke almost entirely along party lines with Representative Hillary Castle whose
district is near the Parkland community being the only Republican to vote against the
measure. Well, she should be smacked for that. The Senate remains the primary
obstacle to restoring these rights. Well, the rights are still there. The way they
really need to put this is like I said before. The Senate is the primary obstacle
to forcing the state to get out of the way of the free exercise of 18 to 20 -year
-olds to buy guns. Senate President Ben Albraton, who is a scumbag,
has not publicly stated his position on the issue. Well, you know why?
Because he hasn't heard from the highest bidder yet. Throwing that out there. But
the bill must pass through Rules Committee where another constitutionally dyslexic
perverted retard named chairwoman Kathleen Pasadomo, which sounds a lot like Quasamoto,
has stated she will not repeal the 2018 legislation. In other words,
she's saying, I am going to be the one to stand between you and your rights.
I am going to be doing, I am going to be the one that says whether or not you
18 to 20 year olds free to exercise your God -given rights ever again.
Yeah, I think we've got something to say about that. Now, we're going to take a
brief commercial time out, and then we're going to take a little trip up to Canada,
and we're going to see some New Jersey -esque pushback going on up there in regards
to firearms, so don't go anywhere. We've got a lot more to go here on Shooting
Strength.
This is your humble host, and I am proud and honored to say that Sicario's Gun
Shop is a sponsor of the Shooting Straight Radio podcast. They're up on North
Wickham Road and Melbourne. They are your full service gun store. They offer a wide
range of firearms, including Class 3 and NFA weapons, ammo and accessories,
gunsmithing. If you want to buy your trade, Head on down to Sicario's Gun Shop.
They also offer transfer service, custom builds. If you need a muzzle device pinned
and welded, no problem they can do that too. Codings, refinishings, cleanings,
survival safety items. Sicario's Gun Shop is your full -service gun store in North
Melbourne. They also have a fine selection of gun safes to choose from. Check them
out at Sicario's Gun Shop .com. Make sure you tell them you heard about them on
Shooting Straight, Sicario's Gun Shop, where you come first for your second.
Norm's Music Shop, producer and music creator for shooting straight radio podcast.
I can write and record a personalized music track for your audio or video projects.
Do you want a song for a special occasion? I can do that. For more information
contact, Norms Musicshop at gmail .com.
Let's create your musical identity. Thank you. Welcome back to the program.
We've been talking about pushback going on against gun control. And that pushback has
begun in New Jersey, among other places, but we talked in the first portion of the
program about how 12, actually 13 New Jersey municipalities are now rebelling against
the state law that demands they charge a $150, you know, just for the heck of it
fee, to all gun owners who want to get a license to buy or carry a gun.
And they are refunding that. And we're also looking at how we looked at how Florida
is pushing you back against the Marjorie Stoneman Douglas Act. And what a
constitutional monstrosity that was. But now we're going to take a little journey
north up into the frozen north, so to speak, up into Canada.
What do they call that? Canuck County, a country I mean. What do you pronounce
that? C .A.
just as I was heavily heartened to read that story about all of those towns and
those municipalities in New Jersey pushing back against the state. Now we're seeing
other provinces in Canada pushing back against the federal government there.
Now, first of all, I'm going to put this notion in your head just to make it make
sense later,
all of these gun control laws that are being proposed here in the United States and
or enacted and enforced, and the ones in Canada and the ones in every other nation
across the world, all of them have their root in the United Nations Gun Control
Small Arms Treaty. I'm going to talk about that here and just a little bit, a
little ways through this article. So bear with me on this. This might be just a
tad lengthy, but not too bad, I promise. This is an article by Jeremy Borg,
B -O -R -G. And this is from December 9th. The Yukon government has formally stated
it will not participate in the federal mandatory firearms buyback program,
placing the territory among a growing group of provincial and territorial governments
resisting Ottawa's gun control policies. If that doesn't give you a reason to be
happy, I don't know what does, especially for you people up there in Canada. The
announcement came during the recent speech from the throne delivered by Commissioner
Adeline Weber, which outlined the government's priorities for the upcoming legislative
session. Now, if you don't know what the speech from the throne is, that's basically
a ceremonial event in parliamentary systems like Canada's and the U .K.
And like Canada, I'm sorry, the U .K. pretty much a constitutional monarchy.
is typically delivered.
the government wants to reach and their priorities and proposed legislation and
everything like that. So that's when they say speech from the throne, that's what
they're referring to. In the address, Weber affirmed the government's intentions to,
quote, support the rights of legal gun owners in this territory, signaling continued
recognition of vetted firearms ownership, hunting traditions, and cultural rights.
The speech also referenced the importance of hunting for First Nations communities in
rural Yukonters, noting firearms are widely used for subsistence harvesting.
It should be sustenance. Wrong word. Anyway, protecting protection from wildlife and
hunting for food and for security in remote regions.
The decision not to participate in the buyback aligns Yukon with Alberta,
Saskatchewan, and Ontario, all of which have publicly declined to assist in the
federal initiative. Well, this is almost like Missouri, passing their Second Amendment
Preservation Act, which recently was ruled illegal,
I guess, by a superior court. But the catalyst for Canada's totalitarianism is a UN
set of standards called Isaacs, I -S -A -C -S. And I'll tell you what that means in
just a second, but those are the standards which can't.
arming the rest of the citizenry. The article continues. Ottawa's plan includes a
mandatory buyback offering compensation for surrendered firearms.
Well, here's my annoyance with so -called buybacks. Number one, they're not buying the
gun back from you. You didn't buy it from the government. Worse than that, they're
using your money, your tax dollars, to give back to you. and, you know,
taxation, that's tax dollars, they stole from you via taxation, and they're giving it
back to you in exchange for you, allowing the government to transform you into a
defenseless victim in waiting, for your own safety, of course. Says, however, low
levels of voluntary participation have contributed to multiple deadline extensions now
estimated to run into 2026. Good. You know what that tells me? Oh,
this gives me great hope right here. There was a low compliance and the government
says, okay, well, we'll extend the date for you. And then there were still low
compliance. Well, okay, we'll extend it again. And they've extended the deadline
multiple times now, which should tell us the obvious and that is the government
fears and armed citizenry when it stands up and says no. That's a principle that we
better latch onto and we better use it for our own preservation and the preservation
of our rights. This is why I talk about resolutions of noncompliance and things like
that, which I will be getting into again, in a very near future episode.
So it says compliance has remained below 1 % in preliminary reporting,
prompting continued debate over feasibility and implementation.
Oh, I love it when these legislators, they pass these laws, excuse me,
and then they expect all the provinces and all the states and all the cities and
everything to help them enforce it and they mandate the enforcement and everything
thereof but then when the cities like it happened in new jersey stand up and say
screw you we're not doing that what do they really have to do what what recourse
do they really actually have after that Well, they don't, because they darn sure
ain't going to come kick your door in if their police won't do it for them. Yep.
Critics of the federal program argue that targeting licensed gun owners and restricted
models does little to address criminal misuse of firearms. And that's true, which
frequently involves smuggled or unregistered weapons. Supporters counter that reducing
the number of prohibited arms and circulation is necessary to improve public safety,
prove it, and bring Canada, listen to this, this is where I'm going with this, and
bring Canada in line with international gun control standards.
Did you hear that?
This is the focus. This is the crux of it all. This is their motivation.
Canada's motivation and the communists there.
It's now called Mosaic, which stands for modular small arms control implementation
compendium. I have no idea why. Anyway,
it is heartening for me to know that the U .S. has not signed on to these
standards, but I guarantee you the next Marxist president will try to do exactly
that. Now, the link showing all these is on this episode web page.
Scroll down and check out the link there and hit it and give yourself a,
it's about a 30 -page read. But check it out and tell me if you haven't heard that
here before. So, introduction to Isaac's 03 .30,
2015. It is estimated that three quarters of all small arms in the world are in
civilian hands. Good. Why don't they call them citizens, though? Mostly,
they are used for legal purposes such as hunting and sport shooting. What about self
-defense? Small arms can be everyday working tools for civilians,
involved in activities such as sustenance hunting or professional hunting,
agriculture, forestry, and species management. Okay, one more time.
What about self -defense? No, that doesn't rate, huh? Globally speaking,
the responsible legal use of small arms, and I'm reading directly from this Isaac's
report by civilians far outweighs their irresponsible and illegal misuse.
So in this report, they are admitting in It's text that they know that lawful gun
owners are not the freaking problem, but yet all of this is aimed at who?
Well, they're aiming at the criminal. Well, do you think criminals are going to
comply? I mean, I hate to put a rhetorical question out there for you,
but of course they're not going to. Who is going to comply? The law -abiding
citizens. So don't tell me that you understand that these are mostly used for lawful
purposes and then turn around and try to strip them from lawful hands. However,
some civilians hold small arms illegally due to the fact that they possess a type
of small arm or even light weapon, the civilian possession of which is prohibited by
law. Okay, prohibited by law. Why? Oh, because the law said civilians can't have it.
to criminals and say that they own their arms now illegally.
Excuse me, they possess more small arms than the law allows or do not possess a
license required by law for the weapons that they hold.
There it is right there. They didn't get the state's permission. They didn't pay the
state for permission and therefore they are now criminals. You see how that works?
A small proportion of civilians misused small arms to unlawfully kill,
injure, or intimidate, including an organized in petty crime,
intimate partner and family -related violence, gang violence, terrorism, and other
illegal acts of aggression. The impact of such misuse is devastating to victims,
their families, and their communities. I'll tell you what, it's nowhere near as
devastating as the COVID vaccine. I'll just leave that right there. When improperly
stored, listen, you're going to hear some familiar stuff. Civilian small arms can put
at risk children and others who come into contact with them. When widely misused in
a particular area, in a particular area, I'm sorry, they can cause significant damage
to the lives, livelihoods, and health of individuals, families, and communities,
and can create a pervasive environment of fear and insecurity that hinders well -being
and sustainable human development. Well, what really hinders sustainable human
development and well -being is Democrat communists run cities and other
that we the people, whether we're in Canada or the United States or anywhere,
how is it that our access to those arms and light weapons is a factor in their
global illicit trade, especially when most of those weapons that are in the illicit
trade are stolen? Loose or inadequately enforced regulation in one state can affect
neighboring states if significant numbers of weapons acquired by civilians are allowed
to flow illegally across borders. Where have we heard this before? Oh, yeah,
Governor Hockel and Governor Prickster claiming that the reason they've got a gun
problem there in their cities is not the gun control. No, no, no, no, no, no. It's
people in other states with lax gun control laws that are infecting their states,
the neighboring state, with those illegal guns, allegedly. So in other words,
all of these states must sign on to the same kind of gun control in order for
there to be complete and total public safety.
while effective import, export, and border controls are essential to preventing illicit
trade, it is also essential that regulatory mechanisms are in place to ensure that
privately held small arms are legally owned and used, and that civilians are held
accountable for their illegal possession, misuse, and trafficking. Well, that's one
reason I hate possession crimes. Possession crimes say, well, because you have it,
you plan to use it unlawfully and therefore you're in trouble. Under international
law, states are obligated to exercise due diligence. Now, this is the same
international law that Canada is trying to impose upon its citizens. Exercise due
diligence in the regulation of private actors under their jurisdiction, including by
protecting their citizens against violence and the threat of violence. And this is
Canada's justification in what they're doing up there. They're regulating civilian
access to small arms and light weapons. And they're claiming that's an essential
element of their responsibility, not to protect the citizenry, but to strip them of
arms. Now, do you ever wonder, like I said before, where the domestic enemies of
the United States get their ideas for these gun control laws? Well, let's read the
Isaac's regulation standards. Tell me they don't sound familiar. In Section 8,
regulating civilian users of small arms, 8 -1, prohibitions.
In order to minimize the risk of small arms being misused by civilians,
national law shall prohibit certain categories of civilians from owning,
acquiring, or possessing small arms. And here's the criteria. A civilian shall be
prohibited from acquiring, owning, or possessing a small arm if he or she,
A, B and C is legally present in the state in which the small arm is to be
acquired, owned, or possessed, has a criminal record that amounts to one year or
more of time served in prison. Read your ATF 4473 form. Same thing on there. Or is
awaiting trial or sentencing or has been convicted of a crime involving the threat,
attempted use or use of violence with or without a small arm, or of robbery,
assault, intimate partner, or family -related violence, gender -based violence. You mean
like them trans people that shoot up schools? Or sexual violence?
Blah, blah, blah. And or if they've been confined by an order of the court into a
psychiatric institution and such. So now they get into the licensing.
First, what I just read there is what you will find a lot of that on the ATF
4473 gun purchase form. It's also most in probably all 50 states by now have such
identical criteria. They got it from the Isaac's regulation.
All right. Section 8 .2, licensing. licensing requirement. In order to acquire,
own, or possess a small arm, a civilian shall be required to hold a license from a
competent national authority. Did we have such a thing? Well,
anyway, I won't go there. But does this sound familiar? What about New Jersey's
firearm purchase card, or the FOID card? And what about the Illinois ford cards.
What about California's license to own a gun? New York's license to own a gun.
All of this comes from these standards. Now, they've got licensed categories,
too, and it's based on the risk that they feel that you might be, whether that's
low, medium, or high. And then they say the licensing authority, the national law
shall designate the competent authority that is responsible for issuing small arms
licenses to civilians, different levels of authorization within the small arms
licensing authority, may be required for issuing different categories of small arms
licenses according to the principle that the higher the risk category into which a
small arm fails, the higher may be the level of authorization required to issue a
corresponding license. Let me translate that for you. How many times have we heard
AR -15s called Dangerous and Unusual? Well, why do you think they started that
category? To fall in line with the Isaac's standards.
That's why. That's what this is. Well, how dangerous Could that weapon be in the
wrong hands? All right, we're going to designate that as an assault weapon. Oh,
that magazine capacity holds more than 10. That's a high -capacity magazine.
In other words, it's more dangerous than all other magazines, and you lowly peon
civilians may not own this. Then they go into licensing conditions.
The issuance and renewal of a civilian small arms license shall be conditional upon
fulfillment by the applicant of basic requirements. Where'd we hear this before?
Every concealed carry program in every freaking state in the United States.
That's where. Yet you better believe it. And they base that on age,
low risk of misuse, legitimate use, safe use, and wait, wait, wait, wait, tell me
if you heard this, safe storage,
inability or failure to meet one or more of the above requirements shall issue,
I'm sorry, shall result in a license not being issued, being revoked,
or not being renewed. So what it comes down to is the state is the arbiter of
whether or not you are, well, should I say, morally qualified to get the license in
the first place, much less by the gun. And let's see. Note,
these requirements are elaborated in clauses 8 .2 .4 .2. And it says,
general, the minimum age required in order to hold a license for a small arm in
the lowest risk category shall be 18 years, that is, hold the license for it,
unless under the applicable law, majority is attained earlier. National law may
require a higher minimum age in order to hold a license for a small arm in a
higher risk category. In other words, if you adhere to the Isaac's standards,
you can raise the age all you like, and you won't violate our feelings on that at
all. An applicant for a small arms license shall be required to provide evidence of
their age. Then they go into exceptions. In the context of introducing young people
to recreational activities involving small arms, like hunting and sports shooting,
the competent national authority, y 'all have one of those in Canada, anyway, may
make arrangements for people under the minimum age set out in clause 8 .2 .4 .2 .1 to
legally possess and use, but not own a small arm, provided that this takes place in
a controlled safe environment, and individual supervision is provided at all times by
a small arms license holder age 21 years or older. Notice they don't give any
criteria for what a safe environment is or a controlled environment is. That's
totally arbitrary. So that gives them power to, what should I say,
find loopholes in their own laws. In no case shall national law permit a person
under the minimum age set out in Clause 8 .2 .4 .2 .1 to acquire or own a small
arm. Now they go under low risk of misuse, 8 .2 .4 .3.
In addition to the criteria set out in Clause 8 .1, the Small Arms licensing
authority may put in place additional measures to minimize the risk of small arms
licenses being issued to applicants who are likely to misuse them.
So here you go. They're making sure they put in some criteria there to keep the
public safe, allegedly. Then they go into 8 .2 .4 .4, what they consider to be
legitimate use, In order to strengthen compliance with national regulations regarding
legitimate and illegitimate uses of small arms by civilians, you notice they didn't
make any legitimate or illegitimate uses of small arms by the government. The Small
Arms Licensing Authority may require applicants to specify a legitimate use for the
small arms. Where did we hear that? Oh, yes, yes. You have to give a good reason
to the state of New York as to why you want to purchase a firearm. You know,
in some of these communist occupied territories, self -defense is not a legitimate
reason to own a firearm? Yeah, now you know. Where'd they get that from?
From the Isaac's standards, that's why. That's where, I'm sorry, not why. then they
talk about safe use and what they
General safe storage of a small arm shall be a condition for holding a small arms
license. Let me translate that for you. You have to prove that you are able to and
know how to and will store your gun in compliance with their dictations.
You understand that, right? That means you can own it, but you better store it the
way we tell you to. Do you think the government's going to tell you to store your
gun in a way that you can access it quickly in order to defend yourself and your
family? If you think so, I don't think you've read the Isaac's standards.
Violation of this condition shall result in a license being revoked or,
and or not being renewed. A civilian applying for a small arms license shall be
required to demonstrate capacity to store the weapon and its ammunition safely and
securely when not in use to minimize the risk that it could be stolen or accessed
by someone other than the licensee, in particular by a child. A safe storage
practice includes when not in use, now tell me if this doesn't sound familiar like
some of the laws in many of our states here, a small arm shall be stored unloaded
well as far as i'm concerned if my guns loaded it's in use it's in use by me for
self -defense or defense of my home and family that's why i have loaded guns in
various places all around my home so that i'm never more than a step or two away
from one and more unlikely. I probably already have one on my person anyway. A lot
of times my gun doesn't come off my hip until I go to bed. So,
but they're saying it has to be stored unloaded, separate from its ammunition. Does
this sound familiar yet? This is exactly how they require all of these safe storage
laws at all of these states here in America. Must be out of reach of children.
On a premises that offers protection against intrusion, in other words, you have to
have protection standards, alarm systems, cameras,
what should I say, reinforcement on your windows and doors and things like that.
Before you can store it at your home. It says on a premises that offers protection
against intrusion. You know what that could also be construed as, you have to store
it somewhere else and not your home. You have to store it with a local gun dealer
or a local armory or something. And in a sturdy locked storage unit,
number one, that can withstand, and it doesn't mean a storage unit like we have
here in America, that means an item like a lockbox, that can withstand a 15 -minute
attempt at forced access by an adult using commonly available household tools.
Who made up this standard? Wow. It's funny when they wrote these things.
You know they copyrighted these standards? Yeah, they copyrighted them. I wonder if
the governments of New York and Illinois and California and Oregon and Washington
State that all have laws that mirror this very thing. I wonder if they got
copyrighted permission from the United Nations before they put these same conditions
in their laws. I can't help but wonder that. It says,
oh,
there it is. That can withstand a 15 -minute attempt at forced access by an adult
using commonly available household tools.
only one thinking and saying that. She's echoing the sentiments of every other bloody
Democrat communist in any position of authority anywhere in America. They all say
that they all think, and I said this years ago, that these safe storage laws are
going to be used to circumvent Fourth Amendment protections. They're going to say,
well, we have a right to come in to make sure your guns are locked up and we
don't need a stinking warrant. Now move aside. Oh, we don't that is 1230 at night.
We're coming in.
Okay, you get the license initially, they come to your home, inspect your home,
inspect your storage facility. Oh, you want to renew it? We're going to come and
make sure you still got that. You know what? It's such a great idea that we do
this now. We're just going to go ahead and make it so we can just come to your
house anytime we want and force you to show us your safe storage units,
your safes, whatever the case may be. It's going to happen, people. It's going to
happen.
I don't want to get into all those other time frame for issuance and all this
stuff. Let's get into license validity. The validity of a small arms license shall
be limited in time. It shall have an expiry date after which it is no longer
valid. The expiry date shall be clearly marked on the license. The validity of a
small arms license should be limited to a reasonable period of time,
in other words, like three to five years. If you want to renew that license, well,
you have to prove you can safely store your guns. They can revoke your license if
you don't meet all their criteria. And so there you go. What we're taking your
license? You guess what they're going to take after they take your license of your
guns. If you're not licensed to have them, you have to give up your guns too. You
understand now that licensing is nothing but a power grab by the government, gives
them power over the free exercise and ownership of your rights and your weapons?
That's what it does. I'm not going to get into much more of this and the
standards. You can read them all for yourself. But one thing I want to point out,
in addition to the safe storage standards, if you don't report the loss or theft of
a firearm within 24 hours, you can get in trouble for that and lose your license.
Where have we heard that before? Oh, yeah. People in the United States being
arrested for not reporting or not actually, no, for reporting their firearm was
stolen out of their vehicle and then getting arrested because the police decided on
a whim that, well, you shouldn't have left your gun in your vehicle so you didn't
store it safely and now you're getting arrested. Yeah, we're not going to go try to
find the criminal. We're going to arrest you. That's what that comes down to. So
that's where these safe storage laws and their requirements come from.
So to finish up this article that we started with, they're in Canada where they're
pushing back. The provinces are saying, we're not going to adhere to the government
standards as they try to
responsibility under the Criminal Code. Yukon's decision adds momentum to an ongoing
national conversation about jurisdiction, regional autonomy, and how gun policy should
reflect the realities of northern and rural communities. Well, here in America, it
needs to reflect the realities of the Constitution and all of the lives and all of
the limbs sacrifice to uphold and defend our Constitution and protect our way of
life and defend our right to keep and bear arms. That's what we do here.
The article finishes by saying the issue is expected to remain a point of contention
as Ottawa prepares to advance the program while northern and Western governments
signal continued pushback over its scope and execution. Good.
This is exactly what needs to be happening in Canada. That's exactly what needs to
be happening in New Jersey, as we referenced at the beginning of the program, and
I'm happy to see it going on up there. 13 different municipalities now saying flat
out, we're not charging those state fees, pound sand. You know what that is?
That is the beginning of even more pushback. Just like one gun control law engenders
the next and the next and the next, well, so does pushback. It lights a fire.
It's a little spark. It ignites the kindling. It lights then the main body of the
logs and other things like that. That's what needs to happen here with pushback.
Pushback against gun control. One more time, I'm going to ask, I'm going to put
forth a challenge to everybody out there, not my listeners, but all of you out
there who are anti -rights, you are pro -civilian disarmament,
I'm going to ask you to prove to me when and where. Give me one instance where
the free, responsible exercise of the right to keep and bear arms has ever harmed
an innocent person. I'll wait. In the meantime, stay in contact with your
representatives. Stay trained up. Get some training if you don't have any. Get armed
up. Make sure you're stocked up on beans, bullets, and band -aids. And never forget,
incoming rounds always have the right of way. Royce out.