Unacceptable Misunderstandings of the 2nd Amendment

From willful ignorance to unacceptable ignorance, ANY ignorance of the text and history of the 2nd Amendment is utterly unacceptable in our public servants. Royce references recent and older comments from Jeanine Pirro regarding her stance on the 2nd Amendment, as well as other articles regarding this destructive misunderstanding in herself and others in the public eye.

Transcript

THIS TRANSCRIPT WAS AUTO-GENERATED ELECTRONICALLY AND MAY NOT BE PERFECTLY WORD-FOR-WORD ACCURATE OR GRAMMATICALLY CORRECT. WE APOLOGIZE IN ADVANCE FOR ANY IRREGULARITIES AND/OR MISTAKES.

Life has a way of throwing unforeseen events and new opportunities our way. At
Glover, Orndorff, and Flanagan wealth management, they are dedicated to putting your
interests first with a truly personalized approach. They are there to bring confidence
to your investment planning choices. Whether you need income production for retirement,
401k guidance, long -term investments, or other financial planning needs. They'll focus
on the establishment of a plan tailored to your life's priorities. For more
information, call Bill Orndorf, partner with Glover -Orendorf and Flanagan Wealth
Management today at 321 -344 -1 -2. 3213 -4 -1 -2.
Investment products and services are offered through Wells Fargo Advisors Financial
Network LLC. Member SIPC, Glover, Orndorff and Flanagan LLC is a separate entity from
Wells Fargo Advisors Financial Network.
WJS Guns in North Merritt Island is where you need to go for your firearms,
ammunition, accessories, holsters, body armor, fishing tackle, and much more.
WJS Guns also offers blue label pricing for law enforcement officers on multiple
firearms brands. And above all, WJS Guns offers friendly, exceptional service to
everyone, especially to us ladies, and first -time gun buyers. For more information,
check them out at WJSguns .com, and always tell them Roy sent you.
on the shooting straight show Turn it all
Let's go
Roy's Bartlett The keeper
Only the facts about the Second Amendment And never ever Forget that all gun control
balls Are nothing less than overt acts of aggression against the American people and
their rights. Exercise your rights in a safe way. Stupidity to think that someone
hell bet on violating the law against murder will magically be stopped by a gun
control law. Politicians that infringe on our God given rights,
he calls them out, he's not here to play.
So turn it on to the head, crank it up.
Roy's Bartlett and the Shooting Straight Show.
Let's go! Let's go!
Welcome to the Shooting Straight Radio podcast. We are locked, we are loaded, and we
are loud. Yes, indeed. We've got a lot to talk about again today. For those of you
that don't know, this is a program primarily about firearms with a heavy emphasis on
the Second Amendment, and all things pertaining there too. I am Royce,
you're also gracious, cute, cuddly, hugable, lovable, squeezable, pleasable host, still
pouring it to you from both barrels with 100 % felt recoil and no suppressor at
all. I want to remind you if you'd like to reach out to me, Shooting Straight
Radio podcast at gmail .com. We'll get you right here. Also, if you're still
following me from the radio days, Shooting Straight Radio Show at gmail .com,
we'll get you right here, and I will definitely answer you as quickly as I see
your email. All right, let's dive into things, no sense in any more formalities,
but it's dispensed with them. First want to start by reminding us all that our
founders never once intended for any of our rights that we freely own and exercise
by birthright are to be subjected to any assaults from legislators or from the
executive branch or from the judicial branch. But more importantly,
the Second Amendment stands out as far as being protected seemingly above the others.
And let me explain why. In the First Amendment, the Bill of Rights states very
plainly, Congress shall make no law, meaning you don't make any laws that contradict
or contravene free speech or that try to silence people with a differing political
opinion and you uh don't you or to worship freely as they see fit uh worship the
right god that is uh you don't have freedom of religion here if you are a
butchering raping piece of crap from the middle east and you think that america
protects your religion. We don't. We absolutely abhor your religion,
and I don't want to get too far off the beaten path here, but freedom of religion
doesn't encompass all religions. I'm free to be a Satanist if I want.
Well, you're not really, no, especially with the crap that you all believe and the
evil stuff that you promote. But anyway, back to at the topic at topic at hand.
When they wrote the Second Amendment, they said flat out, and you know the amendment
as well as I do, a well -regulated militia being necessary to the security of a
free state, the right of the people shall not, to keep him bear arms,
shall not be infringed. They didn't say Congress shall make no law,
because then politicians would just find another way around the legislative process,
like they did by creating the ATF and the NFA, and find a way to do it.
By the way, the NFA was passed in spite of vociferous resistance against it,
where people saying, you don't have the right to do this. Congress and the president
at the time said, oh, yes, we do, because it's a tax. Well, who told you it's
okay to tax a right? Nobody, because it's, you shall not infringe this even with a
tax. So we all know the NFA is woefully illegal. It's unlawful.
And the enforcement of it all these years since 1934 has also been illegal.
our founders knew that the three institutions of our government,
the legislative, the judicial, and the executive branches could be easily corrupted,
and corruption always assumes the role of tyrant, always across the board.
Ignorance among public officials regarding the Bill of Rights is already woefully
insufficient.
but also many of them's views of the Second Amendment. I mean,
if you want to find out what somebody knows about the Second Amendment or if they
are a staunch Second Amendment supporter, just simply ask them, what does the Second
Amendment mean to you? Well, recently, we had some comments from one Miss Janine
Piro, and I stated during the intro of the last podcast, and I'm amazed at how
many elected officials how little they know about the Second Amendment.
That includes conservative ones, alleged conservative ones. They actually know so
little about the Second Amendment and its purpose, its scope,
and its function. This was borne out recently by comments from Ms.
Janine Piro. And Ms. Piro is about to learn that words are like bullets.
Once they leave your muzzle, you have no control over how far they go or the
damage that they do. Let's start with her first tweet. Let me be clear.
I tell you what, let me be clear. Let Royce be clear. Anytime you preface something
with let me be clear I automatically have throwbacks and flashbacks to Barack Obama
and every time he said let me be clear he was about to tell you a whopper of a
lie I am kind of leaning that way here let me be clear said Ms.
Piro I'm a proud supporter of the Second Amendment no ma 'am you are not you don't
even understand it and proof is about to be shown here in your words. She said
Washington D .C. law requires handguns to be licensed in the district.
I thought you said you were a supporter of the Second Amendment. Where do you see
licensing in the Second Amendment, ma 'am? Where do you see that? Handguns,
long guns, anything. Where do you see that in the text and history of the Second
Amendment? Yeah, let's apply the Bruin standard here. Requires handguns to be licensed
in the district with the Metropolitan Police Department. So that means if you're
going to carry a gun in D .C., you have to go to MetroPD and get their permission.
To be carried into our community. We are focused on individuals who are unlawfully
carrying guns, and we'll you building on that momentum to keep our community safe.
Ooh,
yeah, as soon as I, anytime I read that crap, we want to keep the public safe. We
want to keep community safe. And your words and your actions don't match.
The best way to keep your community safe, ma 'am, is to remove all illegal laws
that forbid the people from carrying guns for their own protection. That's the best
thing you can do. And that includes any idiotic licensing schemes where somebody has
to go to Metropolitan PD and get their permission to freely exercise the right they
were freaking born with. So she made those comments and she rightfully faced the
wrath of Second Amendment proponents. And like I said, rightfully so.
We have to call people out. And of course, they get upset when we do that. Anytime
you point your finger at some alleged conservative or Republican and tell them you
don't understand the Second Amendment. Oh, my goodness, the contempt that comes out
of them in the wake of that is palpable. And it's also very telling.
So here's a comment from Ms. Piro after being called out by all of the Second
Amendment proponents, and here's her comment. Okay, put your safeties back on.
You condescending blippity blank and blip. Who do blippity blank do you think you
are talking to us like that? You think we're beneath you? You think you're above
us? Maybe you should have said, I am so sorry. Apparently, I didn't make myself
clear, and I'd like to reiterate what I said, and maybe offer an explanation,
too. Not this, okay, put your safeties back on. No, lady, put your thinking cap on
before you freaking speak. You understand when you make comments like this and the
one that we already referenced, we drop our trust level for you exponentially.
You understand that? I don't think you do. Because, number one, you can't understand
the Second Amendment as it is. How could you possibly understand the angst and the
ire that we feel every time some public official like you make some ignorant comment
about the Second Amendment? Do you understand that that just sets us on edge?
Makes us think we're just a little bit closer to having to defend ourselves against
government thugs coming to disarm us, you know, like they did in the wake of
Hurricane Katrina. Okay, put your safeties back on, she said. I'm a proud supporter
of the Second Amendment. Yeah, sure you are. However, oh,
let me translate that, but, yeah, you need to be responsible.
Okay, well, first where'd you get the notion that people that Cary guns, law -abiding
citizens to carry guns, are irresponsible. Number one, they're showing their
responsibility by carrying a freaking gun in the first place. They're taking
responsibility for their own defense and the defense of their families. And possibly
the defense of even an idiot like you, ma 'am, or even a Metro PD cop who just
recently licensed back that right to somebody. That person might and save their life.
Don't tell me what responsible is. We're far more responsible with our guns than you
people are with your freaking words and the laws that you pass and enforce. And
then she says, and every responsible gun owner that I know, make sure they
understand the laws where they are going and understand whatever registration
requirements there might be. Really?
Well, every true upholder and defender of the Second Amendment that I know
understands that all gun control laws are treasonous acts of unlawful,
constitutionally forbidden aggression against the American people and their rights.
Oh, but you're a staunch Second Amendment supporter, are you? Really? Yeah.
You think registration is okay. Is that it? You think registering our firearms is in
line and compatible with the Second Amendment. How do you do that? How do you
arrive at that conclusion, ma 'am? She said President Trump's goal here,
And my goal as well is to take guns out of the hands of criminals. Really?
First, that's impossible, okay? It's utterly impossible. And anytime you set out to
take the guns out of the hands of criminals, it's funny how many innocent people
get caught up on those drag nets. She said there's a reason that we, that is D
.C., have the lowest homicide rate in recorded history of D .C.,
we're taking guns off the streets, illegal guns from the hands of criminals who want
to use those guns to victimize law -abiding citizens. Wrong. Removing just the guns
won't do crap. Removing the criminals is the only proven way to increase the actual
public safety of the general public, okay? remove the bad people they don't need
guns to victimize people but good people do need guns to defend themselves against
the criminals
so remember you're invariably going to miss some of the guns that bad guys have you
can't catch them all you can't find them all and they will be using their guns to
victimize people who did follow the law and did not carry a gun because they did
not want to go through the constitutionally repugnant process of registering their
freaking carry weapon with MetroPD. She said there's a big difference here.
If you're responsible and you follow the laws, you're not going to have a problem
with me. Well, Ms. Piro, I do have a problem with you. And I have a problem with
people like you that really do not understand, as I said earlier, the purpose,
the scope, and the function of the Second Amendment. You also don't seem to
understand that you have no blipity -blanking right to prosecute and arrest and
prosecute anybody who walks into D .C. wearing a firearm,
unless, of course, they're a felon with a firearm. Other than that, you have no
constitutional authority to do that. Oh, but you're such a staunch supporter of the
Second Amendment. Uh -huh.
And you really didn't assuage anybody's concerns with that particular response, by the
way. Among other issues there, ma 'am, you said your goal is to take guns out of
the hands of criminals. The problem with that, as I said earlier, many innocent
people have been treated like criminals for simply exercising their right in
Washington, D .C., and the bad people you take the guns from will be out of jail
and rearmed in no time while the good people are still sitting and there rotting,
waiting for their lawyer, waiting for all the processes to be, the charges to be
processed, and everything else. Meanwhile, the revolving door in most areas like D .C.
lets the criminals right back out.
Also, let me give you a hypothetical. What if somebody with a valid, say,
Pennsylvania carry permit or a West Virginia or Virginia carry permit carries a
pistol into the D .C. area and they get arrested for it. You understand,
ma 'am, that the law in D .C. treats them like a criminal, considers them to be a
criminal. Even if they have no record, no rap sheet, no nothing, they're a criminal.
And what did you just say? You're wanting to take guns out of the hands of
criminals. Well, I tell you what, y 'all are pretty good at manufacturing criminals
with some of these freaking laws that people run afoul of in their ignorance, and
they shouldn't have to contend with those dadgum laws in the first place if all the
elected officials actually followed the letter of the Supreme law and never passed
any gun control in the first freaking place. Yeah,
you treat people who carry guns accidentally into D .C.
with the same severity as some gangbanger or some robber or some carjacker.
Now, believe it or not, Ms. Piro once rightly declared in her view that Washington
DC's ban on openly carried long guns and possession of so -called large capacity
magazines violates the Second Amendment and violations by lawful D .C.
gun owners would not be prosecuted. Now, why the reversal? And that's a huge
reversal from a position
she uttered back in 2004, yeah, 22 years ago.
And we'll look at that in just a moment. So if she's willing to take such a or
make such a show of support for the constitutionality of those carry statutes in D
.C., then she should do the same with their lack of concealed carry reciprocity as
well as their totalitarian gun registration requirements. Okay? Instead,
her statements seem to suggest that she does find those statutes against carrying
without a permit to be somehow in compliance with the Second Amendment and such a
position is, how should I put it, utterly unacceptable for someone in her position
to hold in any government position to hold. Now,
I grant you, this is more than likely it was stated out of her ignorance rather
than her maliciousness, but there's more evidence that Ms. Piro simply doesn't
understand the Second Amendment, like I said, which is utterly unacceptable for public
officials, and that her recent quote unquote approval of D .C.
residents owning tactical rifles in high capacity magazines is a very untrustworthy
flip -flop. And it seems to expose her as someone whose political loyalties change
with the wind, depending on who she's working for. I'm going to reference an article
from the New York Times from back in in April 25th,
2024, an article by Barbara Whitaker. It says, District Attorney Janine Piro,
a Republican, allegedly, called on Washington last week to set politics aside and
extend, listen, the federal ban on assault weapons, which is scheduled to expire
September 13th. You caught that, right? Yes, that was the Bill Clinton assault weapon
ban, and she wanted it extended. And she said this,
the fact that I'm a Republican doesn't have anything to do with this. You're right
about that. I've been in law enforcement 29 years, and there's no legitimate purpose
to have an assault weapon. These weapons are employed by drug operations, by gang
enterprises. This is about killing as many people as possible in a short, in a
short a period of time as possible. Ma 'am, those weapons are also employed by cops,
soldiers, and free citizens, and we have every dead gun right to keep and bear
them. Worse than that, now, we have a never -trumper who has already used in her
words to strategize against Trump and anybody he might support.
And this strategist, according to this article by Cam Edwards, says he's going to
use Ms. Piro's comments to target gun owners in the midterms. How do you like that?
Ms. Piro, you're about to find out that your words are a lot like bullets.
You have no control over them once they leave your muzzle. You have no control over
how far they go or the damage that they do. And you, ma 'am, in your ignorance,
have done us a great disservice here in the Second Amendment community. This never
-trumper and co -founder of the Lincoln Project named Steve Schmidt, I think he'd
probably leave the M out of that, has a plan to keep gun owners away from the
polls this November by reminding them of recent comments made by Janine Piro and
also comments by FBI director Cash Patel. Isn't that nice?
Yeah, they're going to use your words to attack our rights, Ms. Piro. How do you
feel about that? Now, I know she probably wasn't being malicious,
but I'm going to tell you right now, public official ignorance is unacceptable.
If you, ma 'am, or anybody, takes the oath with their hand on the word of God
saying that you are going to swear an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution,
and then you turn around and make comments like this, you're proving yourself unfit
for your office. Absolutely.
Of course, if we kicked everybody out of office right now, there was unfit for it.
My goodness, we'd have to hold some very quick emergency elections to counter the
big power vacuum. So we're going to take a brief commercial timeout and give Ms.
Piro a little bit of a break. And then we're going to come back and go to New
Mexico and talk about their Proposed ban on all of those assault weapons that Janine
Piro said back in 2004, we didn't need. Stick around.
We'd be right back with more Shooting Straight.
Hey, guys, let me tell you what. Counterstrike Tactical is the absolute best little
gun store in Melbourne. And proud sponsors of the Shooting Straight Radio podcast.
Come visit us at 1008, Strawbridge Avenue, and see the custom AR builds by Anthony
Balejo, owner and combat veteran, plus AK -47s, handguns, ammo,
tactical rifle accessories, and much more. So stop in and see us, 1008, Strawbridge
Avenue, and visit the best little gun store in Melbourne. Or give us a call, 321,
499, 4949. Tell Anthony that Roy sent you. We can't wait to see you.
As many of you know, I, your host, am a firearms instructor, and I run all of my
firearms training business through Shooting Classes .com because it simply doesn't make
sense to try to do it all myself. With automated roster creation when students sign
up, payment processing, and automated emailing to your students, reminding them of the
class date and time, it simply doesn't make sense to try to do all of that by
yourself. Get signed up with Shooting Classes .com today and take a big load off
yourself. Shootingclasses .com
Norm's Music Shop Producer and music creator for shooting straight radio podcast.
I can write and record a personalized music track for your audio or video projects.
Do you want a song for a special occasion? I can do that. For more information
contact, Norms Music Shop at gmail .com.
Let's create your musical identity. Thank you. Welcome back to the program.
We gave poor Miss Piro a good beating in the first half. And I don't dislike the
woman. I think she's pretty spunky and feisty against the communist in this country
and everything. But again, I say, ignorance of the law, the Supreme law, is no
excuse for anybody. If ignorance of the law for you and I, dear listener,
is inexcusable, then ignorance of the Supreme Law was absolutely inexcusable.
That's just the bottom line. And especially when you've got governments in the
states, the state governments like New Mexico, they're proposing a ban on so -called
assault weapons, and it's already passed the first Senate hurdle. I'll be referencing
heavily an article by Mark Chestnut from February 3rd.
And here it is. A sweeping gun ban proposed by Democrats in the New Mexico
legislature is drawing pushback from Republican lawmakers in the land of enchantment.
But,
excuse me, not enough to keep it from being approved by a key Senate committee.
Senate Bill 17 is a ban on so -called assault style, end quote,
weapons, and would severely undermine the Second Amendment protected rights of New
Mexico gun owners. Well, they don't care. That's their focus. That's what they plan
to do. And it's for government safety and not public safety. According to the
National Rifle Association's Institute for Legislative Action, or NRA -I -L -A,
the measure would, quote, unconstitutionally stripped law -abiding New Mexicans of their
Second Amendment rights by banning common gas -operated semi -automatic firearms, 50
caliber rifles, and magazines holding more than 10 rounds under the guise of
extremely dangerous weapons. Extremely dangerous.
How do you measure the dangerousness of a weapon to minimal minimal uh minimal
minimally dangerous to extremely dangerous. How do you do that? Well, it's certainly
not based on any facts because you people are woefully ignorant. Um, what is the
guise of extremely dangerous weapons? Why is an AR -15 more dangerous than a Glock
17? I mean, it's firing bullets that can kill either one of them. I mean,
because it has a high capacity. That's really what scares these people. The fact
that we can have high capacity rifles to take on their thugs if they ever decide
to send them to our doors to kick them in and take our other guns from us. Yeah,
that's what this is really all about. The article continues. Further, the act targets
the firearms industry. Listen, remember recently with the former ATF assistant director
and her alleged study saying that the licensed FFLs are the ones that are feeding
and fueling the underground illicit trade and guns? Further, the act targets the
firearms industry by, quote, imposing excessive and costly bureaucratic mandates on
local firearm dealers, including invasive site -hardening security measures and 24 -hour
response requirements for law enforcement trace request. Well, guess what?
There's already 24 -hour requirements for trace request. We get trace requests where I
work all the time. You know what our duty is? According According to the Alphatango
Foxtrot, we have to have that response back to them within 24 hours.
We always send it email. I never trust anybody I speak to on the phone with the
ATF. You send it email that way you've got hard copy that you did, and this is
the C word I hate, comply. Lastly, the measure would also compromise the privacy of
peaceful citizens through centralized record keeping. Anytime the government centralizes
anything will be tied to citizens. Centralized record keeping of purchaser identities
and serial numbers. Oh, that's a registry. That's not a centralized record keeping.
That's a registry of gun owners, not just their guns, of gun owners.
You know, like the the ATF has been doing? You know, if y 'all are wondering why
the ATF is getting these suppressor stamps and SBR stamps back to you so quickly,
because they are reveling and how quickly we hand over so much information to them,
and they have been building not just a registration of guns, a gun registry,
an illegal gun registry, they've been creating a citizen registry,
lists of citizens that they know have guns. And they're also creating an AI -powered
database for facial recognition of every one of us that has a stamp or stamps.
You didn't know that, did you? That's right. They're using every photograph we send
them to further enhance their second unlawful registry.
So lastly, the measure would also compromise the privacy of peaceful citizens through
centralized record keeping of purchaser identities and serial numbers while threatening
dealers with felony charges for Technical compliance errors.
No, not just the stripping of your business license, a felony.
Let that sink in real nice and deep. You understand what they're doing, right? Yeah,
they're trying to follow the recommendations of little Miss Mariana,
whatever her name was. We'll talk about her more just a second when she wrote that
bogus study saying that FFLs are the ones fueling and basically supplying the illegal
gun trade. This article continues, the measure is officially named, here it is,
the Stop the Illegal Gun Trade and Extremely Dangerous Weapons Act.
Number one, there's none of you in New Mexico that has any constitutional right or
authority to even write a gun control law, much, much less start writing these
assault weapon ban laws and things like that. That is an act of treason as far as
I'm concerned. Why would you want to disarm the entire populace of your state of
battle ready and battle capable weapons? Well, we know what the reason is and it
has nothing to do with public safety.
The sponsors of the bill are pushing hard to get it through the legislative process.
Democrat Representative Andrea Romero, she made this moronic statement. And during the
Senate Health and Public Affairs Committee on January 28th, she said, we regulate
alcohol and cannabis more strictly than we regulate gun dealers.
No, No, you don't, number one. The other problem with that is there's no amendment
that protects cannabis and alcohol in the Bill of Rights that also forbids the
government from infringing the ownership or use of marijuana or alcohol. There is an
amendment protecting the keeping and bearing of arms by the people, and that
amendment says you may not even write the laws you're trying to pass. It also says
in the 14th Amendment that you may not do it on a state level. Second,
you have no such constitutional authority to regulate firearms in the least,
period, end of story. Third, just because you were granted power to regulate cannabis
and alcohol, doesn't mean that you were given carte blanche to regulate everything
else your little pepick and communist heart desires from there on out. This is the
problem when you give these scumbags power. They stretch it to the nth degree,
and they think they can just keep building and building and building on their power
while stripping more and more of it from us. This is what they do. Count on it.
She also added that the dealer provisions were simple. This is her statement. Secure
your inventory, train your employees, track your sales, and stop selling military
-grade weapons designed for mass casualty. In other words, run your businesses the way
we tell you to. Military -grade weapons.
We have the right to military -grade weapons, and so do the people of New Mexico,
you filthy little communist piece of worthless trash. this statement obviates the fact
that she believes that report by former ATF Associate Assistant Director,
Mariana Mitcham, that claims the illicit firearm trade is fueled and supplied by
lawful licensed gun dealers, and they are doing their best to cut off the supply of
arms to the people of New Mexico. Back to the article. About the only hope for New
Mexico gun owners is the pro -gun Republicans in the New Mexico House and Senate,
and they're speaking out loudly against all the provisions in the measure. I'm sorry,
I wholeheartedly disagree with that statement that the Republicans are the only hope
for New Mexico gun owners. The only hope for New Mexico gun owners are New Mexican
gun owners. Yeah, they are the only true hope when it comes to truly securing and
defending their constitutional rights because they, I hope to God,
if you manage to pass this, I hope they rally at the governor's mansion and say,
or at the state house and say, you can pass this all you want,
but you come try to enforce it and see what happens. Yeah, that's where this needs
to be right now. Eventually they're going to win the legislative war. Eventually,
they're going to find judges to uphold their unconstitutional laws. Eventually,
they're going to win the PR campaign. The only thing that truly terrifies them is
armed citizens, and the proof of that is in the fact that they are trying to
disarm them. So, back to the article, even though they were a minority on the
committee, They spoke out strongly, that is, the Republicans in the committee hearing,
calling the bill unconstitutional, a gross understatement to be sure. Republican
Senator Rex Wilson told the committee, he says, we really need to focus on the
criminal element, and I think we can unite on that. No, you can't. You don't
understand, sir. The Democrats in your state protect and defend the criminal element,
sir, they have a parallel judicial system. They turn out the bad people back onto
the street while prosecuting to the eighth degree, anybody that runs afoul of one of
their unconstitutional laws. He said, how can we do something that doesn't punish the
legal law -abiding dealers and purchasers? Sir, you don't understand. That is their
goal. That's their aim, sir. Quit looking at them as just misguided people.
They're not. They're your freaking enemy, and if they thought they could do it
tomorrow, they'd march across the aisle, pull out a heavy bladed knife, and start
hacking throats. Don't you put it past them. These people are scumbags, and if you
can't tell that from recent things that they have said on TV regarding what's going
on in Minneapolis, and you ain't paying a freaking tension.
Another person speaking out against the bill was Nancy Bennett, a Santa Fe -based
firearms instructor. She says, I really do have empathy for the people who suffered
from gun violence. Oh, stop. Stop using the contrived terminology of our enemies.
What about the knife violence people have suffered? That doesn't matter. What about
the blunt force trauma that people have suffered? What about that violence? What
about vehicle violence? Just stop with this. I hate the term, gun violence.
Violence is violence. I can kill you with my hands. I don't need a gun to kill
you. I could do it with a blade. I could do it with a tree branch. There's so
many things I could kill you with if I was so disposed. It's a garbage.
I have sympathy for people who suffered from gun violence. I hope they understand
we're not promoting gun violence. They don't. They don't understand that. You know
why? Because they believe all the bull fertilizer that the media and the civilian
disarmament cartels pour into their willfully ignorant little ears. Okay?
They don't understand that. They don't want to understand that. You are the boogeyman
or the boogie woman in this case. You are evil. The Democrats said you were and so
therefore you are evil and you must go. Common sense. What's that? Yeah,
they don't want to. So, Ms. Bennett, please. I love you. I appreciate you. Thank
you for what you're doing. But stop using their terminology. Stop allowing these
domestic enemies of the Constitution to control the narrative and the language and
force you into a place of guilt that you did not earn. I am sick to death of
guilt being heaped on me simply because I own firearms. And then she continued,
he said, I really wonder what the purpose of all of this is. That is,
these laws being proposed. Well, that's a large part of the problem. You shouldn't
wonder at all. They've stated their inclinions, their intentions very clearly.
Not to mention the fact that you can easily see what their end game is by taking
a short look back into the history of communism and all other disarmed citizenries.
It's really easy. All you've got to do is pick up a freaking history book. Matter
of fact, pick up your phone and hit Google. Yeah. How about just Google in?
Genocides of unarmed people. Let's start there. She said it's a burden on small
business people in this state and on gun owners. As people have said, you're not
addressing the source of the crime. Ma 'am, that's their intention to be a burden,
to create a burden to gun stores and drive them out of business and to create a
burden some hurdle for gun owners and stop them effectively from owning and keeping
and bearing arms that the government is afraid of their end game is to shut down
the arms supply to the people this is a warfare tactic this is not misguided
political ideology, okay?
They said ultimately, the committee voted six to four to advance the bill, whether
or not opponents gain enough steam to stop the punitive measure remains to be seen.
If passed by both the House and Senate, there's little doubt that anti -gun Democrat
Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham would gladly sign the measure into law.
And we know she would because she was the one who used the executive order power
of her office to just magically declare certain areas of Arizona or New Mexico,
I'm sorry, to be off limits to gun owners. Yeah. Well, you can go there. You just
can't take your gun and defend yourself. Off limits. Just by executive fiat.
I promise you, people, if she thought she could get away with that and strip
everybody's guns from their hands tomorrow without any pushback, she would freaking do
it. Mark my words, I assure you. So you stay in touch with your reps.
You stay in contact with all of your senators and you let them know that you are
not playing around. You let them know that the last line of defense is not them,
but you, when it comes to defending your rights, you let them know that.
Remind them of that. Betrayal is second nature to some of those scumbags.
You remind them that that could come with a heavy price. So you stay in contact
with them all. You make your voice heard. You stay armed up. You stay stocked up.
You stay trained up. And never forget, incoming rounds always have the right of way.
Royce
out.