There's a Reason the 2nd Amendment is the Supreme Law

Multiple topics and states covered in this fast-paced edition!  Royce cuts through the confusing haze of unconstitutionality of all gun control laws and exposes the confusion caused by them.

From Virginia, to Delaware, to Florida and beyond, there's a trunk-load of information herein, tune in and share!

Transcript

THIS TRANSCRIPT WAS AUTO-GENERATED ELECTRONICALLY AND MAY NOT BE PERFECTLY WORD-FOR-WORD ACCURATE OR GRAMMATICALLY CORRECT. WE APOLOGIZE IN ADVANCE FOR ANY IRREGULARITIES AND/OR MISTAKES.

Life has a way of throwing unforeseen events and new opportunities our way. At
Glover, Orndorf, and Flanagan wealth management, they are dedicated to putting your
interests first with a truly personalized approach. They are there to bring confidence
to your investment planning choices. Whether you need income production for retirement,
401K guidance, long -term investments, or other financial planning needs. They'll focus
on the establishment of a plan tailored to your life's priorities. For more
information, call Bill Orndorf, partner with Glover, Orndorf, and Flanagan Wealth
Management today at 321 -344 -1 -2. 3213 -4 -1 -2.
Investment products and services are offered through Wells Fargo Advisors Financial
Network LLC. Member SIPC, Glover, Orndorff and Flanagan LLC, is a separate entity
from Wells Fargo Advisors Financial Network.
WJS Guns in North Merritt Island is where you need to go for your firearms,
ammunition, accessories, holsters, body armor, fishing tackle, and much more.
WJS Guns also offers blue label pricing for law enforcement officers on multiple
firearms brands. And above all, WJS Guns offers friendly, exceptional service to
everyone, especially to us ladies, and first -time gun buyers. For more information,
check them out at WJSguns .com, and always tell them Roy sent you.
on the shooting straight show turn it all tune in let's go
Roy's Bartlett the keeper in the bearer of truth we know
play the facts about the second amendment and never ever forget that all gun control
balls are nothing less that overt acts of aggression against the American people and
their rights. Exercise your rights in a safe way. Stupidity to think that someone
hell -bent on violating the law against murder will magically be stopped by a gun
control law. Politicians that infringe on our God -given rights,
he calls them out, he's not here to play.
So turn it on to the end, crank it up,
and they're shooting straight show.
Let's go! Let's go!
Yes, indeed, we are locked, loaded, and loud. Welcome to the Shooting Straight Radio
podcast. This is all about firearms with a heavy, heavy emphasis on the Second
Amendment, and all things pertaining there too. I am Royce, your cute,
cuddly, hugable, lovable, squeezable host, still pouring it to you from both barrels
with 100 % felt recoil and no suppressor at all.
I want to remind you, you can follow me on social media, on the Shooting Straight
Radio podcast Facebook page, and on Instagram.
radio show at gmail .com and i always respond i usually immediately uh and so if
you want to reach out to me make sure you do it there thank you so much for all
of you that do i really appreciate that you uh reach out with articles and things
and points of interest and i tell you what you some of you are very instrumental
in my show prep believe it or not because of some of the articles that you you
send me. And I really thank you for that. I really appreciate that. Believe me, I
know if it's on my mind, it's probably on your mind too, because we all pretty
much think alike. Well, let's go ahead and get things started here. First, I want
to just briefly touch on this most recent demented trans weirdo,
a mass murderer who committed another mass murderer by gun in Canada.
And thanks to all those gun control laws in Canada, it would have been so much
worse. Yeah, you're catching the sarcasm too. Yeah, because when seconds counted,
the authorities were aware, only minutes away. Which is, of course,
usually the case. But thankfully, all of the after -incident reports, all of them
honored the killer's pronouns at least. So insult was not added to the injuries that
he, she, it, or whatever it was, inflicted on the victims there. So thank goodness
that his pronouns were still intact. I don't have enough facts to make a full
report on this just yet, but I am mindful of it. And I like to give these things
72 hours because so much information information is withheld at first.
Usually the first reports are wrong or they're very, what should I say, insufficient.
And so I want to give this a little bit more time before we touch on that. Now,
I want to reference an article by my buddy Dan Wass. He is the host of the Loaded
Mike. You can catch him on YouTube. And he's writing this article for ammo land and
all of you people in virginia you are already getting it done thank you for what
you are doing up there i tell you what got a lot of patriots up there you guys
are kicking butt and taking names and you keep doing that and you put those little
communists in their place up there the marxist muslim coalition of your governor
lieutenant governor your AG and some of your reps who were flaming Muslims and
you're already getting it done because you know the ATF can no longer what should I
say assess that $200 fine it is a fine isn't it $200 fee for a tax stamp because
that was done away with recently but of course the Virginia government,
yeah, the communist, decided they were going to reattach that fee and oh, say,
bump it up by another $300, yeah, $500 just for a suppressor.
That's the tax that you would have had to pay the state up there in Virginia.
Excuse me. And here's a little bit of the article by Dan Wass. The announcement,
the suppressors in the Commonwealth of Virginia will not be taxed as being considered
a victory by many. Well, it is. For now, it's temporary, but it can be permanent.
You can make it as permanent as you want it to be. The proposed suppressor tax has
been removed, at least for now. It would seem Abigail Spanberger and her gang of
anti gun tyrants are getting the push back they deserve, and they do deserve a lot
of that. The Virginia gun grabbers might be starting to realize that taking advantage
of the citizens they allegedly represent is not good optics for re -election.
I don't think they care about re -election, Dan, and no, I'm not taking issue with
you on this. I'm just going off of what Ms. Spanberger recently did in signing a
bill or a proposed bill to redistrict the entire state to give them an over,
over, what should I say, a lopsided number of Democrats over Republicans,
and we know why they're doing that. Once they have their districts locked down,
that's when the election fraud comes into full play, and that's when they will start
stealing elections. They won't have to worry about the voters at that point. But
until that system is in place, yep, they might be taking a little bit of a hint
here. But it says in an ex post, American Suppressor Association president,
Knox Williams made the announcement that the proposed $500 tax on suppressors is
dead. Well, I promise you, being the good little Democrat communists that they are,
they'll come up with a new tax because they've never met a tax they didn't like
and didn't want to implement in its fury. Now, here's a little jog down into
Florida, my home state, And this is an article by Raphael Omeda,
writing for the South Florida Sun Sentinel, a rag, a liberal rag,
as far as I'm concerned, but the title is gun control advocates blast Florida
Attorney General for refusing to defend concealed carry law.
Well, which concealed carry law are they referring to, certainly not one that works
in favor of gun owners at all. But what it is really is one that denudes 18 to
20 year olds from carrying concealed firearms. And that happened back in 1987.
That was not part of the 2018 boondoggle known as the Marjorie Stoneman Douglas Act.
Let's read the article a little bit. Florida Attorney General, I'm sorry, Florida
Attorney General James Uthmeyer asked an appeals court to uphold a teenager's right
to carry a concealed weapon even after a Brower judge last year declared the ban
constitutional. Of course, God knows what he was looking at to make such a
declaration. Dealing another blow to gun control advocates who have tried to make it
harder to buy and carry firearms in the Sunshine State. Uthmire also declined to
allow the Broward State Attorney's Office to defend the law on its own, drawing
criticism from some who say the state is abdicating its responsibility to defend the
laws passed by the state legislature. Well, I've got news for you.
Any law passed by the state legislature that are unconstitutional,
they may be ignored with extreme prejudice, according to our founders. And we have
no obligation to simply accept and comply with any and all unconstitutional laws or
some court's decision that upholds them. So the Article continues.
At issue is a 1987 law that blocks anyone between the ages of 18 and 21 from
carrying a concealed firearm. So I'm guessing that the person in question here is
either 18 or 19 years old. The law has survived multiple reviews and reconsiderations
of gun rights and gun control legislation. By the way,
That same law was heavily defended by none other than Pammy Blondie when she was
our utterly useless AG down here in Florida. Now we're stuck with her on a national
level.
Last October, Broward Circuit Judge Frank Letty dismissed the case against a teenager
arrested for carrying a concealed handgun a felony punishable by up to five years in
prison. The judge wrote in his ruling, excuse me, he said,
because the Second Amendment's plain text applies to the concealed carry of firearms,
I like this guy already, he's using the Bruin principle, the plain text.
Because the Second Amendment's plain text applies to the concealed carry of firearms,
Florida's concealed carry ban, as applied to 18 to 20 -year -olds, is unconstitutional.
Amen, amen, Judge Letty. But months earlier, Judge Lorena Mastrarigo upheld the same
law in a similar case. Well, that doesn't mean it's right. Why isn't you guys only
side with the rulings made by liberal court justices. Defense lawyers in that case
appealed the ruling, and Uthmeyer decided the state was wrong to prosecute the
defendant, asking the appeals court to rule for, said defendant.
In a written statement issued Monday, Broward State Attorney Harold Pryor said he
disagreed with the attorney general, but would comply with his decision.
Oh, you're so gracious. He made this statement.
Given the impact of gun crimes in the state of Florida, what about all the other
crimes? What about their impact? Including the February 14,
2018 mass shooting at Marjorie Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland and our
community, which resulted in the tragic murders of 17 children and adults and severe
injuries to 17 other individuals who survived, we respectfully disagree with the
position taken by the Office of the Attorney General. Let me translate that for you.
The free exercise of the rights of the people of Florida is completely contingent
upon the violent actions of criminals. That's essentially what he's saying. Well,
based on all this gun violence and based on what happened down in this state before
when some evil little piece of crap, some little demon -infested snotwad,
took a gun and killed a bunch of his fellow students that therefore should cancel
out the rights for all 18 to 20 -year -olds,
sorry. By the way, There were a total in 2024 of 3 ,200 people in Florida that
died by gunshot wound. Half of them, more than half of them, were suicides, and the
rest of those were also homicides, but a large portion of those were justifiable
homicides committed by cops and armed citizens. There was a total of 17 ,902 violent
crimes committed in Florida in that year in 2024, and gun deaths only account for
17 .87 % of all violent crimes in Florida that year.
So why is it that only the violent gun crimes are being focused on? Well,
we know why Democrats don't like the rest of us having guns. They want to have a
monopoly on force, and they fear the guns of conservatives, and the reason they fear
the guns of conservatives is because they know that they want to do things to
conservatives that conservatives would have every right in the world to shoot them
for.
Despite the Brower judge's ruling, the law remains on the books, and Pryor said as
much that his office will continue enforcing it. So let me get this straight,
Mr. A .G. Pryor, or assistant A .G. Prior, whatever you are. So you were just
notified that this law is constitutionally repugnant, yet you're going to enforce it
anyway. You're a scumbag. Yeah, you're welcome. For the House rep Dan Daly criticized
the Attorney General for putting conservative political preferences above state law. Is
that what you really think this is, jackass? Huh? Yeah, you're going to be getting
a nice little email from me, you douche -nauzle. Sorry, that was not a very kind
thing to say. That was not very respectful to douche -nauzles all over the country.
But that is not what he did, Mr. Daly. He didn't put conservative political
preferences above state law. What he did, Mr. Daly, and rightly,
he simply deferred to the Supreme Law, the one you hate,
which overrides the Florida state law in question. That's why Mr. Uthmeyer said it's
unconstitutional. Let me say it nice and slow for you. Just because something has
enjoyed the status of law doesn't mean that it's unimpeachable if it violates the
supreme law, it's null and void. Daly also said,
while our appointed attorney general might not be aware, he does not have the
authority to abandon a state law simply because he disagrees with it well he didn't
abandon it because he disagrees with it you bring jackass he abandoned it because
the supreme law of our land doesn't agree with it and he that that supreme law
enjoys primacy over Florida's state law so anything that does not measure up to the
Constitution, is repugnant there too, is null and void,
automatically at the will of the people, Mr. Daly. Don't get mad at Mr.
Uthmire. How about you get mad at me and all of my fellow conservatives? That's
right, you already do hate us anyway. I'm calling on Governor DeSantis to intervene
here. The governor has previously removed duly elected state attorneys for far less,
no example given, of course, based solely on statements about enforcement discretion.
You know, you have enforcement discretion on just about everything short of murder
and rape and some of the more severe crimes. If they do not align themselves with
the Supreme Law. DeSantis has shown no indication that he disagrees with Uthmeyer or
Judge Lettie on gun rights. Then Mr. Fred Gutenberg, whom I've referenced on this
show many times, because he likes to interject himself into the Second Amendment
debate, and he likes to use his status as a victim. He had a daughter,
sadly, who was murdered by that scumbag in Parkland. And, you know, my heart goes
out to him for that. But,
well, let's just read what he has to say. No single official should be able to
decide which laws are worth defending, especially when those laws are designed to
protect the public from gun violence. Freddie, baby, what's what judges do all the
time, sir? Those black -robed single public officials? Yeah,
they slam the gavel on laws they don't like all the time. You're welcome. That's
right. Yeah, one single official, a judge, does this regularly.
And when it comes down in favor of you and your leftist politics, you're okay with
it but anything that gives a leeway to the free responsible exercise of someone's
rights you have a problem with that yeah he's a he says as a father who lost my
daughter Jamie to gun violence no you lost it to a scumbag a little demon filled
scumbag sir The gun did not commit the violence. He says,
I am deeply disturbed by the Attorney General's refusal to defend Florida's concealed
carry law for 18 to 21 year olds. Well, it's not 18 to 21, moron. It's 18 to 20.
Laws like this exist to protect our communities and save lives.
Okay. Well, Mr. Gutenberg, I am very saddened for you. And the loss of your
obviously precious daughter, I'm sure I'd be upset too. Heck, I might even go crawl
into a bottle of scotch and never come out again. But, sir, channeling your grief
and anger against the rest of your fellow citizens by demanding that we all be
disarmed simply on the basis of what your daughter's murderer used as the murder
weapon is absolutely misguided and excruciatingly perverse,
sir. And, Fred, please feel free to offer any evidence that proves criminals will
obey those gun control laws. You may think they're designed to keep people safe,
but in what fantasy world do you reside where bad guys Bay laws.
Huh?
Really, I'm sick to death of people like you equating guns with violence,
with, you know, felonious violence. I'm sick to death of you heaping the rest of us
in a pile with scumbags like the one that murdered your daughter. You think simply
we're guilty by association because we own the same firearms. That, sir,
is absolutely perverse. You own vehicles, but yet, sir, people have used vehicles to
run over a bunch of people up on sidewalks. They've been used in terrorist attacks.
They've been used in car bombings. So, how dare you own a car?
Yeah, yeah, same logic. You like that? Of course not. Anyway,
I'm very happy to see our Attorney General down here in Florida using his
constitutional sensibilities in favor of the free exercise of the right to keep in
bare arms. We're going to take a brief commercial time out. Then we'll take a
little trip to Delaware and talk about how, well, let's put it this way. Every time
the Constitution gets forsaken and tucked back in a corner and where it doesn't
enjoy primacy over the other laws and it's not even considered during many judicial
decisions, it creates an absolute tangled web of confusion.
It absolutely does. And we'll talk more about that. When we come back right after
these brief commercial timeout. Don't go anywhere. The listener retention squads are
all on standby.
Hey guys, let me tell you what. Counterstrike Tactical is the absolute best little
gun store in Melbourne and proud sponsors of the Shooting Straight Radio podcast.
Come visit us at 1008 Strawbridge Avenue and see the custom AR builds by Anthony
Balejo, owner and combat veteran, plus AK -47s, handguns, ammo,
tactical rifle accessories, and much more. So stop in and see us, 1008, Strawbridge
Avenue, and visit the best little gun store in Melbourne. Or give us a call, 321,
499, 4949. Tell Anthony that Roy sent you. We can't wait to see you.
As many of you know, I, your host, am a firearms instructor, and I run all of my
firearms training business through shootingclasses .com because it simply doesn't make
sense to try to do it all myself. With automated roster creation when students sign
up, payment processing and automated emailing to your students, reminding them of the
class date and time, it simply doesn't make sense to try to do all of that by
yourself. Get signed up with shootingclasses .com today and take a big load off
yourself. Shooting classes .com.
Norm's Music Shop. Producer and music creator for shooting straight radio podcast.
I can write and record a personalized music track for your audio or video projects.
Do you want a song for a special occasion? I can do that. For more information
contact, Norms Musicshop at gmail .com.
Let's create your musical identity. Thank you. Welcome back to the program.
We have been talking in the first portion of the program about how whenever the
Supreme Law is not considered, whenever the principles therein do not enjoy primacy
and supremacy over all other laws, it creates a boatload of confusion amongst the
populace, amongst the courts, amongst the judiciary, everything. And proof of that is
going to be in this story I'm about to read to you from Cam Edwards.
Here's the thing. All laws that run contrary to the Supreme Law are
advocates and how they're all incensed and just flabbergasted that he had the right
to do that to override a bad law with the Supreme law. Wow.
Now, another case coming out of Delaware is going to also exhibit this rather
handily, I should say. Here's the article, Delaware police and the prosecutor enforce
a law even after the courts say they can't. There are a number of ongoing lawsuits,
challenging multiple gun control laws in Delaware, including Rigby v. Jennings,
which takes on the state's ban on possessing, manufacturing, and assembling quote
-unquote, untraceable firearms. A U .S. District Court judge,
however, granted a temporary injunction blocking enforcement of much of the law back
in September 2022. By the way, why are untraceable firearms so worrisome to the
Democrat Communist Party? Well, because they can't control them. That's why. And they
feel they have to have, they must have some sort of divine right to control the
people simply by virtue of being elected to their positions, of course, yeah.
Apparently, someone did not get the memo because the State Department of Justice sent
a letter to Judge Mary Ellen Norieca this week informing her of an arrest and
prosecution under an enjoined statute. Well, an enjoined statute means that a judge
has issued an order saying this is is likely or is flagrantly unconstitutional.
Let's read on. The case proceeded to family court where a deputy attorney general
offered the 17 -year -old a plea deal. So it was a 17 -year -old carrying a ghost
gun, an untraceable gun. Oh, my goodness, it's untraceable.
You're going to read that it in here often. Untraceable. It's not traceable. We
can't control it. It doesn't have a number on a special number whereby we can
identify that gun and wield total control over it from its manufacturing to its
disposition.
The 17 -year -old was offered a plea deal. If he would plead guilty to a possession
of an untraceable firearm, all the other charges would be dropped. Well,
why was that particular charge the most important one to maintain? Once again,
control.
That was a pretty good deal for the defendant since possession of a firearm by a
juvenile comes with a mandatory six -month stay in juvenile detention.
That means there's no discretion over the judge's decision. While possession of
untraceable firearm can be punished with a mere probationary sentence,
the teen took the deal last April and received probation for his crime. The state
DOJ claims it was entirely unaware of the problem with the case until it reviewed a
summary report of criminal charges and convictions in Delaware over the past five
years, apparently as part of an unrelated case. After discovering the error,
the Deputy A .G. notified the defense counsel and moved to vacate the conviction in
family court late last month. Well, good. You should. Oh, Royce, you think 17 -year
-olds should carry guns? I think my 17 -year -old should. You know why?
Because I train him. Yeah. When he was even a child, if he picked up his squirt
gun or play gun off the floor with his finger on the trigger, I took it away from
him. I started him at a young age teaching him real gun safety. I taught him how
to shoot a handgun, a rifle, a carbine, a shotgun, all those things.
And I'm going to continue to train him until he is more proficient than myself.
He's already very good at mixed martial arts. I want him to be able to be able to
shoot just as well as he practices his arts. Delaware DOJ told the judge that after
the injunction was issued, the department issued a guidance memo explaining the terms
of the injunction in detail. The department added that it was, quote, very likely,
end quote, The same information distributed to law enforcement agencies during a
meeting of the Delaware Police Chiefs Association. So, how did a police officer,
prosecutor, and family court judge all managed to be blissfully ignorant of the
status of the law? Well, probably because they're so accustomed to being tyrannical
over the rights of the people, they always simply just err on the side of tyranny.
That's how they do things. The DOJ's letter to Norieca,
however, does not explain how exactly that happened, but this is a pretty big
mistake, as well as evidence of the soft -on -crime policies and practices by the
State's Department of Justice. The possession of an untraceable wasn't the only charge
the teen faced him, so he still would have been arrested and prosecuted for
possessing a gun and ammunition as a juvenile. But if this is a serious crime in
the eyes of the state, and we've been told repeatedly that guns in the hands of
juveniles is a huge problem, then why did the state offer a plea deal that ensured
the defendant would be sentenced solely to probation instead of a mandatory six -month
stay in juvenile detention. It's bad enough that no one involved in this case
managed to figure out that the statute in question is currently unenforceable because
it had been enjoined by a prior judge. Using that statute to deliver a slap on the
wrist, though, is arguably even worse.
Delaware's prohibition on the manufacture and possession of un -serialized,
untraceable. Firearms should be struck down permanently by Norieca,
given that there is no national tradition of gun ownership requiring firearms to be
serialized. And if the state plans on using the statute as plea bargain bait,
it's not only unconstitutional but unconscionable as well. Amen and amen.
Now, I'm going to leave you with one final story by Dean Weingarten writing out of
Ammo Land. January 2026 NICS background checks dips slightly while NFA checks surge.
I will tell you right now, this story, it has some things on the outer fringes
that really trouble me. And I'll explain what I'm talking about here in just a
second. Let's read a small portion of this article. The National Instant Criminal
Background Check System, the NICS, or we call it NICS, or we call it NICS, adjusted
figures for January 26 show a slight decrease in the number of checks compared to
2025. from the National Shooting Sports Foundation, the following information is
brought forth. It said the January 2026 NSF, National Shooting Sports Foundation,
National Instant Criminal Background Check System, figure of 1 ,198 ,879 is a decrease
of less than 1%. 0 .7. compared for the January 2025 NSS -Assisted NICS figure of 1
.2 million and change. For comparison, the unadjusted January 2026 FBI NICS figure was
2 ,170 1 ,172 ,185 reflects a 5 .6 % decrease from the unadjusted FBI NICS figure of
2 ,299 ,989 in January 2025.
As noted by the NSSF, the adjusted NICS numbers, which include checks for various
gun permits and rechecks for the same, are down 5 .6%.
This is likely a reflection of the increasing permitless or constitutional carry
states, and I believe that's true, too.
On a positive note, the NSSF's report, and I'm not so sure this is positive, well,
it's positive, but it's also negative. I'll explain. The NSF's report on NFA items
saw a massive increase compared to 2025. Well, most of us know why.
2025 January, there was still a $200 tax stamp applied to any NFA item.
Now, there's no such tax. So where I work, we've been selling the living Dickens
out of suppressors and SBRs and short -barreled shotguns too. And yes, even some
fully automatic weapons and such. So, yeah, it definitely makes a difference. What
that also proves is that any tax levied against an item that is directly associated
with the free exercise of one of our rights is indeed an infringement because it
does indeed squelch the free exercise of that right in those areas.
It says the
January 2026 NFA figure of 2 ,071 ,6 ,871 is an increase of 121 .2 % compared to the
January 2025 figure of 93 ,518. Now,
here's where I have a problem.
This is worrisome to me. It shows it willingness by gun owners to register their
firearms with a criminal agency filled with domestic terrorists and enemies of the
Constitution because we're doing that. So many people coming in willingly given
fingerprints and facial photos and the ATF has taken out and they're creating an AI
-driven national database of gun owners. I bet you didn't know that.
Some of you do because you listen to this program. But that's what's going on.
Yeah. So I, yeah, it's great that NFA purchases are up.
It's good for me and our business where we work. But the other side of that is
kind of like, it just grates me no end. Now,
one more thing about the ATF and I'll let you go. An article by John Crump, just
listen to this because the title is ATF reverses course after denying NFA
applications for wanting to, quote, exercise God -given rights. Now,
if you've never filled out an ATF NFA form to get a tax stamp, there's one part
on there that you have to tell them why you think you need that item. Well,
first of all, ATF, it's not called the Bill of Needs. I don't have to tell you
why I need it, but they try to tell us that we have to answer that.
So one of the things they've been denying for answers on line 4L,
or 4I, with a language I'm reading from the article that referenced constitutionally
protected activity as a legitimate reason for possessing NFA items. In a stunning
reversal, the agency has now approved those forms, including those rejected for
constitutionally grounded purpose statements, such as, here's what some of them listed,
quote, exercise my God -given rights, end quote. Amen, brother.
Amen. Or the other one, I love this one, for all lawful purposes,
including justifiable homicide. Yes, amen.
You know why the ATF didn't like that? Probably because they know that lawful gun
owners shooting them in self -defense would be justifiable homicide. Anyway, according
to the reports, the ATF has acknowledged they, quote, should never have been denied
in the first place. Oh, well, it's shocking to us that you guys would do such a
thing. Oh, but now you're reversing course. Yeah, you got your finger in the wind
and you're feeling the political winds and reading the political tea leaves and now
you're trying to justify your budget because you want to be around a lot longer.
The rest of us don't want you around, okay? So those,
it says that, the third case involving an initial approval for an SBR build was
later voided during, quote, routine quality control because the purpose statement for
all lawful purposes, including justifiable homicide, was not palatable enough.
The email from supervisory legal instruments examiner Shannon Severeo instructed
resubmission treating honest self -defense language as disqualifying.
Yeah, well, because it scared the examining agent. That's why. And it should.
Here's the thing. These people know that they are acting outside of constitutional
boundaries. They know it good and stinking well. No matter how many times they may
lie to you and tell you differently or that they believe differently, they know they
exist to infringe the rights of the people. They know this.
I think I talked about them in the last episode, too, talking about how they know
that they are infringing on our rights. And now they're trying to be all nice to
gun owners and everything like that. Aw, that's so sweet.
Yeah. You stay in contact with your reps. You get stocked up, beans,
bullets, and bandages. And You make sure you got plenty of ammo on hand. Get some
training and never forget. Incoming rounds always have the right of way. Royce out.