What we think scicomm needs

We want to talk more with fellow science communication professionals (like you!), and we have lots of opinions! 

We think scicomm needs: 

1. More funding, 
2. A reliable way to hold people with power accountable, 
3. Leadership and development opportunities that extend beyond basic skill-building, 
4. More integration between practice and research, and 
5. Buy-in and formalized support from those with funding and power. 

Which is why we made Meteor! (https://meteorscicomm.org/) 

We want to talk with STEM professionals who are exploring science communication as a component of their career and with people who are pursuing a full-time scicomm position within an institution or as an entrepreneur. No matter what your plan with science communication is, we want to help you do it inclusively and sustainably. 

*** Join this conversation: follow us here and say hello (what do you think of our list?) on Twitter with @MeteorSciComm (https://www.twitter.com/meteorscicomm). 

Share this episode using this link: https://meteorscicomm.org/2021/09/23/ep0-what-scicomm-needs/