Episode # 158 A "Remastered" Life - Part 11

A "Remastered" Life

Finally, everything elucidated via this authentic/mature diplomatic dispatch proves beyond a reasonable doubt one's first in time dominion i.e. rule of law over a formally consecrated "jus cogens" mystery via faultless "Supreme Being" based wholly upon one's exclusive and timeless "little g" genesis i.e. the origin or coming into being of something. Any objections to this first-hand account must be made in writing through the hand of another living man and received by the Author within sixty days publication of "Of Sound Mind/A Pacific Transcription" or everything expressed within this copyrighted tome stands for all men everywhere as the unrebutted truth of the matter from fertilization to last breath in regards to the specie-specific heritage of all mankind i.e. Human Race. Silence is acquiescence. 

The Author/Ambassador/Pacifist

Buy the book at: https://supremebeing.life/

Transcript

SPEAKER_04 0:03

Well three minutes late.

SPEAKER_02 0:05

I don't know I don't know if I've started yet though.

SPEAKER_01 0:13

Well, you have to start for the finish.

SPEAKER_02 0:17

I know. We are.

SPEAKER_01 0:22

This is the last paragraph, yes, but you know what's funny is is you uh you get up early on these calls and I just I'm back in Illinois at this point. And so I've been I've been getting on those calls down in Florida on Eastern time. So I have an extra even another hour. So it was 10 o'clock for me, and now it's nine o'clock. And so it's like, oh it was a little bit of a transition this morning. I was actually ready, just so you know. Um but then I had to go to the bathroom.

SPEAKER_02 1:00

So did you love that coffee? Did you actually have a call with a group of people?

SPEAKER_01 1:08

Not really. Are you? Okay. I I get in I get invited occasionally uh where a few uh other sojourners gather occasionally.

SPEAKER_06 1:21

Okay. Okay.

SPEAKER_01 1:23

But I I just jumped on and and you know, give a little bit of what I'll call it insight about whatever it is they're talking about. But I I it's hard. It's hard because I I feel like I'm intruding on somebody else's stuff.

SPEAKER_02 1:39

Oh. Mm-hmm. That's true.

SPEAKER_01 1:47

Well, I do. When I hear things I have to I have to comment. I have a tendency to take over. So um but I am home. I'm I'm I'm home now, and what's really cool about that is I'm I'm I'm in the basement at where it's dark and there's no other extraneous uh things. It's the distractions. I I it's well lit down here obviously, and I'm I can be focused. You know?

SPEAKER_02 2:14

Yeah. Yeah, I could feel how much we were struggling there. I and I think it's part of the reason why you kept getting so frustrated with me was it was just a general frustration in general from not being able to be where you could one have your stuff and two just all the other people there. So yeah, I get it.

SPEAKER_01 2:38

Well, I mean, yeah, with the first with the grandkids and then and then being away from everything I was using Debbie's computer, which you know, I with a mouse I can move pretty quick. If I if I have to figure out how to use the computer, I'm slow. Um I I did uh this here, I'm I'm very comfortable. If I need to actually go to the uh to the to the shelf and grab a book, it's right here. I mean anything I need is right right here with me, but I didn't want to put it off. I didn't want to put those 11 calls off or these 11 calls off because we would never finish.

SPEAKER_02 3:11

Yeah, we got through it.

SPEAKER_01 3:13

We did.

SPEAKER_02 3:14

I I'm just acknowledging that I felt your frustration. I felt felt that it was hard.

SPEAKER_01 3:19

It was way harder, so thank you for for even more tolerance because I I just I was scared every time I got on a phone that I wasn't gonna be able to do the paragraph, you know what I mean? So uh but the the more I look at this thing, the more I look at a remastered life, the more I look around the world and see what's going on, uh it's it's harder to express now that I mean it seems harder for me now because what where we're at right now with this stuff, and even with what I'll I'll bring that you don't even know of yet today, into this last paragraph, it's it's so amazing how much work the architects of that realm or the architects of that narrative, how hard they try to keep everybody captured into that mindset.

SPEAKER_02 4:21

I know because and how much they use your your words and and twist them.

SPEAKER_01 4:29

Well, they're doing that too. I mean, even AI, uh people don't realize I put a definition into something and AI turns it around or turns it into something else. Um and people believe AI. Well, I believe AI over curve. Well, then you're an absolute moron because AI is programmed to defeat these ideas if it can. To defeat these ideas, and and that's what's scary, is that when I bring up an idea and it says something else, when I say monozygotic, this is an example that I just saw the other day, when I use the term monozygotic maritime monarchy, monozygotic maritime monarchy, that is the moment of fertilization when your kingdom, when your monarchy is created. Your sovereignty is created at the moment of fertilization. So I use monozygotic, and and and so let's just just do this real quick. I'm gonna go to monozygotic.

SPEAKER_04 5:31

Monozygotic.

SPEAKER_01 5:35

Okay, here it is at Webster's. Nothing crazy, not in some weird book anywhere. So monozygotic. At Webster's.

SPEAKER_04 5:44

Look what look what the end. There's one definition there, Linda.

SPEAKER_02 5:50

Derived from a single egg.

SPEAKER_01 5:53

That's it. That's the definition. Monozygotic means derived from a single egg, and that single egg, even though egg is kind of a misnomer, is the ovum. That's the that's the egg. So when dad's sperm fertilizes mom's ovum, the product of that is monozygotic. But what they did on AI is they took the example down below as if that was the definition.

SPEAKER_02 6:27

Wow.

SPEAKER_01 6:28

So they're trying to confuse people to go, oh, monozygotic twins. There are no twins. I don't have a twin.

SPEAKER_02 6:38

No.

SPEAKER_01 6:39

But what they're doing is they're giving rise to another problem or a question that when I say monozygotic, am I referring to twins? No, I'm not. I'm talking about a single egg, derived from a single egg. So what they're doing is they're making it seem like twins, twins exist.

SPEAKER_02 6:57

Wow.

SPEAKER_01 6:58

They need that. They need those, they need those twins. They need the there to be Kurt, and they're need they need to have Kurt have a brother, a twin that died along the way. That's what they need. They need the Jesus sacrifice, they need the Amnion twin to be sacrif the fat sacrificial lamb in their narrative. So when I say monozygotic, when you look at AI, it says twins. Wow. So they're doing everything they can to to m muck up or muddy up um the work we're doing.

SPEAKER_02 7:35

Yeah, of course.

SPEAKER_01 7:36

But they but they can't well that's why you have to people that are listening to this can't just go, Oh, Kurt said that or AI said that. Go look for it. Go look for the answer yourself. You'll see it with your own eyes.

SPEAKER_02 7:48

Well, just looking at this word itself, mono is one.

SPEAKER_04 7:56

Right. It is. So how can it be a twin if it's one?

SPEAKER_01 8:04

Well, because it's from a single egg. So if if two sperm get into that ovum Yeah, I get it. You have then there then there's a twin. Then then you have a twin.

SPEAKER_02 8:16

Yeah, I get that.

SPEAKER_01 8:18

But but but that but that's what they're doing. They're they're making it impossible. The system is designed to knock down the truth or to muddy up the truth so people can't see it for themselves. If they're lazy, if you're not lazy and you do the work for yourself, you'll realize that all of these conversations are quite obvious. So the answer, the truth is easy. If you stop believing all the garbage going on around you, do the work yourself.

SPEAKER_04 8:48

Yeah.

SPEAKER_01 8:49

I don't believe in groupthink. I mean, when I say monozygotic maritime monarchy from a single egg, which is the zygote, it the product is the zygote, the divinity of the zygote, maritime because it happens in the water, and monarchy because that's the sovereignty. Your sovereignty originates at fertilization, not conception, seven days or more later upon implantation. If your sovereignty originates at fertilization, monozygotic from a single egg, maritime in the waters of mother, monarchy, sovereignty.

SPEAKER_04 9:28

There it is.

SPEAKER_01 9:34

I'm already riled.

SPEAKER_02 9:35

Um I'm I'm uh clinking glasses with you in my coffee cats.

SPEAKER_01 9:42

Yeah, so I mean, there's nothing we can do, and realistically, when I say intellectually lazy, I mean people that if you really want to know something, you'll go find the truth. You'll go find it. But when you what you'll realize is that y y the truth is the truth is it it already is. So there's nothing you can do about it but accept it. You accept the truth, which means when somebody says, Kurt, how do we get out of the matrix? You're not in the matrix. That's the truth. The truth is you have not been in the uterine wall, i.e. mother's matrix, since you were in the womb. If you're not in the womb now, you're not in the matrix. That's the truth. The truth is you're not in the matrix. That's right. But you want to keep believing it because it's so cool to think, how do we how do we get out of the matrix? What do we do to exit the matrix?

SPEAKER_04 10:42

It's to accept truth. Just to accept there's a lot of guys making money helping people escape the matrix.

SPEAKER_01 10:53

God, I wish I was making that money. Bullshitting people like that.

SPEAKER_02 11:00

Too bad you can only do truth.

SPEAKER_01 11:02

Sorry about that. I might be my my burden is truth. It's not a burden at all.

SPEAKER_05 11:10

No.

SPEAKER_01 11:11

Realistically, I mean I feel better than almost anybody I know. Even though I sound frustrated, I'm frustrated for you people. Not for me. Okay. So one last cup of coffee and we'll get started. Yeah, I'm putting I'm putting off reading this.

SPEAKER_02 11:33

I know. I know.

SPEAKER_00 11:36

I'm putting off reading it. Okay. Go back downstairs, read this thing and get into this last paragraph.

SPEAKER_01 11:43

Um Which I believe is now it now it's I mean, it's paragraph eleven.

SPEAKER_00 11:51

I know. Thank goodness.

SPEAKER_01 11:54

It's been a tough row to hoe.

SPEAKER_04 12:02

Okay.

SPEAKER_02 12:04

There are no results on etymology online for monozygotic.

SPEAKER_04 12:10

Really?

SPEAKER_01 12:13

Well, it says here if you go go back to go back to Webster's, it says first known use is 1916. Which actually fits pretty well with uh the Mandel House quote about biology. Um well we're you know, the biologic we're gonna take we're to gonna take a piece of your biology for for uh uh security. I mean they have they can't take you, they can't take the baby, that would be slavery.

SPEAKER_04 12:40

But what happens if they took a piece of you? Yeah. So they they created a word that would allow for, you know what I mean?

SPEAKER_01 12:54

Monozygotic twins is how they did it, because my 46 chromosomes and the extra embryonic material are identical. So if they have the extra embryonic material on deposit via the afterbirth, they can say, Oh, we got we got we got this guy. And we're gonna talk about that today. We we will get into that, the the idea of that. You haven't heard the word yet, or maybe you have, I don't know.

SPEAKER_00 13:21

I don't know.

SPEAKER_01 13:24

Okay, so I'm gonna all right, I I put it off long enough. Here we go. Let's try the Yeah. All right, so uh mute yourself while I read this. And I'll uh I'll do the best I can. Okay, so this this is uh a a remastered life from a book called Of Sound Mind, a Pacific Transcription, and which was published, I don't know, uh March-ish 2025.

SPEAKER_00 14:01

Um and it is in the Library of Congress via number, I'd like to do this because I think it helps people understand the value.

SPEAKER_01 14:13

Library of Congress number 2025907424. So there's no plausible deniability.

SPEAKER_00 14:21

People can't deny that this information is not available. Um let me get into this.

SPEAKER_01 14:30

A remastered life for ages, an occult war has raged for control over one's godly extraterritorial nativity when nature's seamless evolutionary due process reveals the whole truth of the matter from one's little Genesis onward. The original birthday cake, a vestigial organ and bio biological phetomaternal incorporation, known as placenta, is a prehistoric biogeographic island territory constituting direct DNA proof of one's first estate monarchy and patrimonial right of way passage across mom's immaculate second estate conception. A supernatural mystery is presumed to commence at an interstate stargate between the mutually exclusive past and present, with the violent cutting, removal, and certification of one's undelivered fetal membership. The severed portion denotes a derelict requiring salvage, an indigenous heathen requiring salvation, or some other contrived thing, when a simple medical delivery of one's faultless supreme being, i. e. baby, umbilical cord, and extraembryonic membranes, makes any alternative physically impossible. Definition of war, a struggle or competition between opposing forces or for a particular end. Next paragraph. My story begins when a living man and woman lay together somewhere upon Mother Earth, late 1959, Gregorian. To be precise, the two living beings to whom I now refer are my dad, Richard, and mom Marianne. The simplest explanation of my present substantial manifestation is during their sexual congress, my dad dropped off genetic building materials as 23 chromosome sperm at a job site known as WOM. Mom provided her own 23 chromosome building materials in the form of an ovum at the same job site. Through an act of God known as fertilization, my personal and private waterborne nuclear kingdom monarchy was created as a singular 46 chromosome celestial body. This perfect maritime masterpiece affords me a harmonious one-way space-time journey from nowhere to now here. Science refers to the evolutionary vessel as the zygote. Religion refers to the intelligently designed craft as an arc. Definition of nuclear of relating to or constituting a nucleus.

SPEAKER_00 17:24

Next paragraph.

SPEAKER_01 17:25

About five days after fertilization, prior to conception implantation, the pellucid membrane skin still envelops my celestial body like armor. During my first estate journey, lasting six days or so, I walk unencumbered across the waters of mother, unattached to anyone or anything. Near the seventh day, my maritime vessel arc comes to rest upon the soil of mom's uterine wall accretion. This second estate Garden of Eden is the littoral bank, accounting for the duration of one's extraterritorial nativity. During one's riparian sojourn, lasting between 37 and 42 weeks, my ancestral vessel arc is safely moored in accordance with nature's seamless evolutionary due process, keeping one's genuine alpha to omega monarchy from being disrupted, scattered about, or lost at sea via menstruation, tempest of birth, or anything otherwise. Definition of extraterritorial, existing or taking place outside the territorial limits of a jurisdiction. Next paragraph. The mesoderm forms my embryonic heart about nineteen days after fertilization and is one's first functional organ. My individual spirit entered the kingdom when my biological heart tissue received a source transmission, distinguishing the nature of my own faultless supreme being from all else, including but not limited to any spiritually bankrupt afterbirth mass, born alive infant member, heretical second coming human, heretical second coming human creature, etc., following my foreign government consciousness and means of transport vessel anywhere beyond the womb. Any contrived terminus or space within one's continuous and contiguous journey from fertilization to last breath is both a trespass and lie by omission, and nature's seamless evolutionary due process abores a vacuum. As my own full measure of self-government emanates from a capital head physically located upon my own shoulders, making it a government separate and foreign to all others, per 18 USC 112, CRM 1624, I declare this fair warning regarding my remastered vessel arc. Do not follow. Definition of omit to leave out or leave unmentioned. Next paragraph. My dad gave me 23 chromosomes establishing my just sanguinous fatherland dignity, while mom gave me 23 chromosomes establishing my just solely motherland dowry. My navel is direct proof of the substantial landing of one's entire first estate monarchy within the continental United States per chapter 1267 Congress 1921, clearly contrary to anything else recorded, imported, or discovered at a later date. As a mature man of sound mind and memory, all present and accounted for from fertilization of last breath, I for one do not suffer the undue influence of childish things, ID id, frequently idolized or taken for granted by the ignorant, unconscious, or insane masses. Definition of elf being different in identity. Next paragraph. To be clear, the bulk of one's divine proportion, PHI, kingdom, is to be delivered as one original package, i.e. baby umbilical cord and extraembryonic membranes, i.e. sovereign and regal retinue, per Brown versus Maryland, 1827, as opposed to a medically marooned naked ape. As a man of sound mind and memory, I for one have full species specific diplomatic immunity to any cutoff membership, genetically modified measure, or contrived composition of matter falling short of nature's seamless evolutionary due process, converted or administrated by by privateers, profiteers, racketeers, etc., unjustly enriched from essential goods during times of emergency or otherwise. Such customization gives rise to a substantially deficient or extraordinary issue dependent upon some absurd absurd spiritual medium, alchemical third party, or kangaroo court to provide an official remedy, reconstruction, or revival in regards to the altered state of his health, education, and welfare. Definition of official described by the U.S. Pharmacopia or the national formulary. Next paragraph. His story begins at the splitting of one's monozygotic atom, i.e. the cutting of the umbilical cord. Said abortion, i.e. mayhem, separates a consecrated cross-section B from one's waterborne kingdom, making it available as a prize in admiralty. The nuclear war over one's holy grail first fruits is fixed via Gregorian date of birth, reducing all civilly registered offspring to incapacitated minors or mendicants forever. Without a mature standing in law, the monarchy's legitimate Y chromosomal agnatic primagenture, i.e. eraparent, effectively degenerates to an institutionalized infant prince, i.e., mama's boy, celebrating adopting the revolutionary immortal civil calendar character, denomination, seals one's fate as full faith and credit underwriter, surety, of a municipal, local bond, or central banking system via personal sacrifice of one's present 46 chromosome body and blood upon a mutually exclusive historic 92 chromosome phomaternal avulsion accretion island wasteland. Definition of standing not yet cut or harvested. Next paragraph the historically fixed transgression of an abandoned vessel arc upon a mysterious biogeographic island territory is a syndicated nativity scene of biblical proportions inaugurating an absurd extraterritorial bank account, Sestica Trust or offshore shell corporation subject to income tax. The official administration of one's lost minor account in any way, shape or form is incontrovertible evidence of mayhem, larceny, genocide, or other war crime committed against one's living person proven via prosecution of one's infant membership. A well-learned man's remastered vessel naturally spans a pass a passage of water separating a mainland and an island and we sojourners of sound mind and memory with intimate knowledge of mom's second estate promised land bounty are exempt from acts contrary to one's harmonious one way space-time journey validated via nature's seamless evolutionary due process from fertilization to last breath fictio sedit veritati definition of mind and memory a c a recollection of persons who are the object of his bounty next paragraph the definition of equity at Merriam Webster's dictionary is justice in accordance with natural law. Natural law begins where Darwin meets God i.e. fertilization and any person place or thing arresting nature's seamless evolutionary due process at any point from fertilization to last breath is an obstruction of justice. One's violently removed goods considered in the abstract as the unborn of animals or identified things attached to realty as fixtures is incompatible with the prescribed laws of nature giving rise to a pauper, vagabond and fugitive from justice devoid of nature's equity and the privileges and immunities of the United States Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it and treaties made under its authority constituting the supreme law of the land definition of abstract insufficiently insufficiently factual formal next paragraph in order to end the occult war before it ever begins we sojourners of sound mind and memory naturally reconcile any unnatural terminus or space between his story and my story for there's no obligation to do impossible things. To wit a man in the public is not to be confused with things of the public for Article 42 of General Orders number 100 the Lieber code unless the real intent is to follow indenture or enslave the man a separation of church and state applies to public lands only and not to one's individual right of way passage across mom's immaculate second estate conception evidenced by one's fetal maternal afterbirth i.e bags and effects per twenty two USC two eight eight B, an event formally concealed the violently removed, medically incomplete, biologically confused birth certificated character res sua Nimini servit definition of reconcile to bring to a state free of conflicts, inconsistencies or differences last paragraph finally, everything elucidated via this authentic mature diplomatic dispatch proves beyond a reasonable doubt one's first in time dominion i. e. rule of law over a formally consecrated just cogents mystery via flawless supreme being based wholly upon one's exclusive and timeless little g genesis i.e. the origin or coming into being of something any objection to this first hand account must be made in writing through the hand of another living man and received by the author within sixty days publication of Sound Mind a Pacific Transcription or everything expressed within this copyrighted tome stands for all men everywhere as the unrebutted truth of the matter from fertilization to last breath in regards to the species specific heritage of all mankind i.e human race silence is acquiescence the author ambassador pacifist you there sorry I put myself on mute that's okay I was hoping that I my phone didn't turn off somehow and I and I went through all that for nothing and I had to reread it no no you did great I just have to go status quo land Well you know what that since this is the last paragraph again after all of everything we've read for the last eleven weeks or the last ten weeks what people got to realize is that when they clamp and cut the umbilical cord they start a war and the definition of war if you go to the very first very first paragraph again is a struggle or competition between opposing forces or for a particular end. The war Linda when they clamp and cut the cord is for your godly origin. It's your godly origin that you're fighting over another or or natural law because um fertilization is both natural law and if you want to use the word creation it's the moment of creation it doesn't matter I don't care if you call it the laws of nature and nature's god or creation it doesn't matter to me fertilization is the origin of a species and they got that species on deposit because they clamp and cut the cord and they place it in what they call the in God we trust. So status quo antebellum what you just brought up is that the definition of Wikipedia is the term status quo antebellum is a Latin phrase meaning the situation as it existed before the war. Well before the cut Linda was my monarchy was my monarchy. My sovereignty was intact before they cut the umbilical cord it says the term was originally used in treaties to refer to the withdrawal of enemy troops and the restoration of pre-war leadership pre-war leadership so before the cut before the cut was my monarchy intact in its entirety but when they clamp and cut the cord there's some confusion now over whose monarchy is that they they call it a war of succession but but if you get in front of the cut if you get in front of the the the act that causes the war by knowing that you're all present and accounted for from fertilization of last breath that's status quo antibellum and then finally it says when used as such this is the the final part of the uh definition it means that no side gains or loses any territorial economic or political rights. So when I'm in front of the cut with this knowledge with this knowledge I'm I'm I'm the monarch. Now I'm not trying I'm not trying to go against anything I'm sorry if you hear beeping it's my son trying to call but if if I switch over I'll screw up the whole call. Um so again the idea is when you understand what's happened you don't have that's not the truth Linda the cutting of the umbilical court is an act of mayhem and it's it's the the medical industry that that establishes that twin that that that that duality they do it. The medical industry's probably the one that's guilty of all this if I have to point a finger I'm gonna say well the medical industry created this they created the opportunity for the war to begin yes so I mean that's that's that would just be my take on it.

SPEAKER_00 32:45

Now what's funny is um what was it?

SPEAKER_01 32:51

Uh there was a Star Trek episode my one of my favorite ones where this the Captain Kirk by the way Kirk K-I-R-K means church Captain Kirk um was was going through a series of tests and the this test was the Kobayashi Maru and it was basically they were put in a impossible situation where failure was inevitable. They were going to fail but they're taught how to fail but they are going to fail in this test it's designed for them to fail but what Captain Kirk did was he didn't didn't go by the rules of that program. He he changed the program so he wouldn't he wouldn't lose well that's what we're doing here. We're actually getting in front of we're getting in front of the birth certificate we're getting in front of the program itself and all the way back to the truth and when we when we actually align with the truth of the matter from fertilization of last breath the the the outcome we're not we're not injured. There's no injured party when there's no cut if there's no injured party there's no case if there's no case there there's there's no cause of action or if there's no cause of action there's no case there's no court so getting in front of the cut and getting all the way back to the truth or aligning with truth from fertilization last breath is what I call the Kobayashi Maru you actually are reprogramming or actually you're you're no longer participating in the program itself.

SPEAKER_00 34:38

It's better just to say you're not party to the program right you're not party to the program you're not part of the program.

SPEAKER_01 34:49

You're not in his story that's the thing his story begins at conception my story begins at fertilization.

SPEAKER_04 34:57

His story begins with the destruction of the sovereignty and his story sounds like there's two of us that's the twin yes anyway go ahead no I was I was just thinking that I have to exist before the cut or there would be no cut.

SPEAKER_01 35:23

I mean ev it just is axiomatic I have to already be here whole for all the rest to ensue you you have to exist you have to exist before they can create his story exactly um so the paragraph the last paragraph finally finally everything elucidated via this authentic mature diplomatic dispatch proves beyond a reasonable doubt one's first in time dominion i.e rule of law over a formally consecrated just cogents mystery via faultless supreme being based wholly upon one's exclusive and timeless little gegenesis i.e the origin or coming into being of something finally the word finally I'm gonna go to finally at I'm gonna just go to the dictionary until I need to explain something big finally at Webster's uh one says after a prolonged time at the end of a period of time two says at the last as the last act or occurrence in a series in the end or eventually um two B says by way of conclusion as the last point uh two C says in the end or ultimately three says in a final manner in a way that does not allow change it does not allow change I'm the author Linda words mean what I say they mean they cannot be there they cannot be interpreted by another and they go well this word means that that might mean it to you but it doesn't mean it to me as the author it might even mean it to you as subject to another story or subject to another realm but it doesn't mean that to me in my story yes my story begins at fertilization I'm the author I'm the only authority over that duration between fertilization last breath I'm it unless the cut is in play that's why the Kobayashi Maru I I don't even I don't accept the cut because I'm not injured it looks like I am by the bank accounts that go in somebody else's name or some other situation but I'm not injured Linda I'm sitting here with my 46 chromosomes which are identical to the original 46 chromosomes of the monozygotic maritime monarchy I'm whole through mind and memory I'm not injured there's no injured party in my it from fertilization of last breath the injured party begins at conception it begins with the legal fiction of conception now there's an injured party the birth date is an it evidence is the injured party I don't know who that is I'm not gonna point any fingers but there is no injured party when you go all the way back to fertilization. There's no injured party okay and then it says finally everything eloof elucidated I'm gonna go to the word elucidate I don't use big words Linda I use words that make sense elucidated websters finally everything elucidated via this authentic mature diplomatic dispatch elucidate to make lucid especially by explanation or analysis and intransiv intransitive verb says to give a clarifying explanation Linda the three books all of these these five hundred plus hours um of calls it's to give a clarifying explanation of the duration of my monarchy or your monarchy or any monarchy of those listening to this call right now no kings no kings yeah in your world go ahead and be common be common be in the public pool I call it the cesspool go ahead and and be part of that communal communistic communal nightmare the welfare state that's the welfare state we're all in it together Kurt no we're not the more I do for myself this is this is my the quote I made up years ago it's it's my favorite Linda the greatest gift I can give to another is to remove the burden of my life from his shoulders that's the greatest gift I can give to anybody if I take care of myself you don't have to worry about feeding me whose responsibility is my family but me mine it's my responsibility your life is not my responsibility and my life is not your responsibility the greatest gift I can give to you is to remove the burden of my life from your shoulders I don't expect you to feed me I'll do whatever I have to do to survive. It's called it's it it it's called self-preservation but if I expect you to feed me if I know you will if I if I know that the family down the street is having money taken out of the his check if I know the dad down the street is having property stolen from him to be given to me there are people that accept that shit Linda there are people that think it's okay to steal from one to give to another absolutely that's a sick society fundamentally sick anyway finally everything elucidated via you know what most people don't even know what Via means I'm gonna go to Via V I A by way of through the medium or agency of also by means of so if you want to read it that way finally everything elucidated by way of by means of this authentic mature diplomatic dispatch I'm going to authentic I'm gonna move through these words until I get to something really deep okay authentic finally everything elucidated via this authentic look at this authentic not false or imitation real R-E-A-L actual by the way the word real royal royal it's and and of course the royal we is God and me or the breath the the breath or the spirit of God in this biology that's real that's royal look at this go ahead well just etymology authentic authentic in etymology one of the definitions is well original genuine it comes from authenties which is acting one acting on one's own authority self one's own author author author one's one's own author authority do I have any authority over you I mean if I'm if my story if I'm the author of my story am I the author of yours no which means I have no authority over you Your story is is your business. Personal and private.

SPEAKER_04 44:04

I have it's none of my business your story is. For that matter, his story, history is none of my business because I've never been there. Right. I've always only been present. I can't be anywhere else. So history or his story is none of my business either. Okay, authentic. Not false or imitation. By the way, imitation, if I just click on it. An imitation.

SPEAKER_01 44:47

An act or instance of imitating something produced as a copy, a counterfeit. Is the birth record real or is it a copy?

SPEAKER_02 44:58

A copy.

SPEAKER_01 44:59

Look at this. A literary work designed to reproduce the style of another author. If I'm the author of my story and some of my stuff gets taken from me, even if I don't authorize it, Linda, a literary work designed to reproduce the style of another author, author. A literary work, like the historical record. The record, the record, R E C O R D. Is that a literary work?

SPEAKER_02 45:31

No. Yes, it is a literary work.

SPEAKER_04 45:34

So so the public record, the birth record, is a literary work. Is it mine or is it his? Yes. It's somebody it's some other author. So it's an imitation of me.

SPEAKER_01 45:49

It goes on to say, uh, philosophy, the the the quality of an object in possessing some of the nature or attributes of a transcendent idea.

SPEAKER_04 46:01

A transcendent idea. Origin. We all begin at the same place. That's you know, that's what we might have in common.

SPEAKER_01 46:16

But even at that origin, we have nothing in common because my zygote, the origin of the species for me, has 46 chromosomes that are unique.

SPEAKER_04 46:26

I have nothing in common with anybody else. Imitation.

SPEAKER_01 46:35

Relying something else that is usually that is usually genuine and of better quality. Not real. The genuine issue, Linda, is my 46 chromosome me right here. But my my 46 chromosomes, the trillion cell body I'm using today is identical to the single cell monozygotic maritime monarchy. So the monarchy is genuine, and by extension, so am I. We're gonna get into that.

SPEAKER_04 47:08

So I'm not an imitation, I'm the genuine. So I'm getting out of imitation.

SPEAKER_01 47:15

Um, number two, it authentic says true to one's own personality, spirit, or character.

SPEAKER_04 47:26

That's ownership. It says one's own. Am I sharing my personality with anybody else? No.

SPEAKER_01 47:37

How about my breath? Am I sharing the spirit or the breath of God with another?

SPEAKER_04 47:42

No.

SPEAKER_01 47:43

How about my character? Is it am I sharing my character with anybody else?

SPEAKER_04 47:49

No.

SPEAKER_01 47:51

So there no. Um 3A says worthy of acceptance or belief as conforming to or based on fact. Authentic.

SPEAKER_04 48:04

Uh let me look at.

SPEAKER_00 48:08

I'm looking for.

SPEAKER_04 48:10

I like 3D. Okay.

SPEAKER_00 48:12

What does it say?

SPEAKER_02 48:15

Conforming to an original so as to reproduce essential features. Well, maybe not so much.

SPEAKER_01 48:22

Conforming, yes, yes, yes. We're getting that you know what that word is called? And it's in this paragraph, by the way. It's it's on this sentence. We're gonna get to it, but you brought it up even before we're there. Conforming to an original. That's the zygote, right? The original is the monozygotic maritime monarchy born in the water or created in the water at the moment of fertilization, which is a zygote. That's the original. What conforms to the original as evidenced by a belly button?

SPEAKER_04 48:54

The umbilical click? The baby.

SPEAKER_02 48:58

The baby, of course.

SPEAKER_01 49:01

Embryo fetus babies identical to the original, the same exact 46 chromosomes. Yeah. So it says 3B for authentic is conforming to an original. That's the single cell zygote, so as to reproduce essence. Essential features. That's your 46 chromosomes. That's the essence of your existence. That's that's the information they're using against you.

SPEAKER_04 49:34

Conforming to an original so as to reproduce essential essence features.

SPEAKER_01 49:39

My belly button used to be connected to the origin, directly connected to the original, the zygo. The monarchy. It used to be direct, and then somebody cut me off, somebody cut me apart, somebody destroyed my link to the monarchy. Linda, I don't know who that is, but somebody did, or they tried count.

SPEAKER_00 50:02

Because I'm still here.

SPEAKER_02 50:06

And have knowledge, you know.

SPEAKER_01 50:08

And I have knowledge of my true godly origin. So they have not separated me. There is no particular end from me because I've accounted for it, all present and accounted for from fertilization to last breath. There's nothing missing in my kingdom.

SPEAKER_04 50:26

Right. Which means there's no injury. Right. No injury means no cause. No claim, no cause.

SPEAKER_01 50:39

No cause, no court.

SPEAKER_02 50:43

That is closed.

SPEAKER_01 50:44

Nobody can make a claim. Yeah, yeah, nobody can make a claim.

SPEAKER_04 50:48

And if there's no claim, there's no cause. If there's no cause, there's no court. All right.

SPEAKER_01 50:58

Authentic mature. Why why am I so adamant about the word mature? Not just because I'm 65 plus years old. I'm what I'm trying to do is show that I'm not stuck in some infancy or minor position.

SPEAKER_04 51:14

Let somebody prove that I'm not mature. Mature. Let's go to mature. Having completed natural growth and development. Am I still in the womb? No. Am I still in the matrix? And am I still in mom's uterine wall? No.

SPEAKER_01 51:38

How about this? Having attained which is 1B. Having attained a final or desired state.

SPEAKER_04 51:52

The present. Yeah. Mm-hmm. Present moment.

SPEAKER_01 51:56

Having attained a final or desired state. So if I've if if my desired state is the present, remember, my the state of mind is of that state too. So if if my mind is in the present, if my body is in the present, and my spirit, the breath, is in the present, is that not the desired state? Is that not my presence?

unknown 52:21

Yeah.

SPEAKER_04 52:22

If I'm present, am I stateless? No. Nope. Not if I'm certainly not if I'm wholly present. Um right.

SPEAKER_01 52:35

Look at this. This is a strange one. This is going to be hard for some people because they don't understand the second estate. But look at number uh, look at D, of relating to or being a person past middle age. When you think of the three estates of the first estate, second estate, and third estate, which one's in the middle?

SPEAKER_02 52:56

The second estate, the nobility.

SPEAKER_01 52:58

Which is what but it's in the it's in the uterine wall. It's in the uterine wall.

SPEAKER_02 53:05

Mm-hmm. So I passed middle age, yes. You get it?

SPEAKER_01 53:09

The middle age, if you look at it from a biological standpoint, the first estate, the second estate, and the third estate. The first estate is prior to implantation, which the United States calls correct. Pre-implantation is correct according to the United States. So pre-implantation has my entire kingdom as one monozygotic maritime monarchy. That's pre-implantation. The second estate is when I implant into the uterine wall matrix of mom. That's the middle.

SPEAKER_06 53:43

Mm-hmm.

SPEAKER_04 53:45

It becomes the middleman, the middleman. Yeah. And then I come out of the womb. But when I come out of the womb, I have the exact same forty-six chromosomes as the first estate. Because they're identical. They're identical. Um let me do something real quick. The problem let me go to let me I posted something the other day. Let me just see if I can find it real quick. Is there's a legal word and it's called Let me see, I po I posted the uh picture of it.

SPEAKER_03 54:39

On Facebook?

SPEAKER_04 54:40

In Well, no, in in um there it is. It's called and I'm gonna go to Black Slaw Fifth Edition. It's called Palage. P A L L A G E Talage.

SPEAKER_01 55:15

Page thirteen oh five, Flax Law Fifth Edition Talage, T A L L A G E, or Tailage, Tail, T A I L A G E, Tailage. It says a piece cut out of the hole. Wow. Used used metaphorically for a share of a man's substance paid by way of tribute, toll, or tax being derived from the French tailier, which tailier, which signifies to cut a piece out of the hole. When they clamp and cut the umbilical cord, Linda, that is a tailage or talage.

SPEAKER_04 56:08

Wow. Wow.

SPEAKER_01 56:14

So that my life from fertilization of last breath is one unbroken duration. But when they clamp and cut the cord, they're taking a piece of me, which is known as tailage or taliage. And they call it tribute, toll, or tax. I call it bullshit. I call it theft. I call it trespass. I call it mayhem larceny and genocide. That's what I call it.

SPEAKER_00 56:42

Talage is what they call it. Okay. So where was I? I better better go back to where I was.

SPEAKER_01 56:52

Um mature. But but the tallage, we'll get into this too. But remember that the piece of me, Linda, where where is it? I'm I'm using all of my biology today, which is my body, but where is the piece located? The tallage.

SPEAKER_02 57:11

It's still the talage. It's still in the um the fetomaterial maternal placenta, or uh it's on the accretion.

SPEAKER_01 57:23

It's on it's on the accretion, which is mom's uterine wall. So a piece of me is fallen, the fallen man, the fallen angel, has been deposited on that ground, making it holy ground. But they're calling it tallage. They're saying that that's my my that's what I'm offering to God. That's my sacrifice. I'm sack sacrificing that piece of me to God. So the piece of me that's fallen or been cut off of me that is still attached to the maternal part of the placenta, which is her accretion, that part of me is called an abultion.

SPEAKER_02 57:58

And then they become the intermediaries between you and God because of the talent.

SPEAKER_01 58:04

Wow. The clergy is saying, we control that, we control that holy ground. Right. So then mature um 2A of relating to a condition of full development, characteristic of or suitable to a mature individual, um, based on slow, careful consideration is mature. And then um to bring to maturity or completion, Linda, at 65 years. Now I know that my cells replace each other about every seven years. So even now, when I'm 72 or when I when I become 72, seven years from now, pretty much my entire biology of this body will be replaced, with the exception of my neurons in my brain. But they're always being replaced. That's just part of evolutionary due process.

SPEAKER_02 59:13

It's just part of life, it's part of nature, but laws of nature. But your 40 yeah, but your 46 chromosomes are still the same.

SPEAKER_01 59:22

They never change. That's why it's important to understand why I talk about the DNA or or the 46 chromosome kingdom, monozygotic maritime kingdom, all the time, because that's always mine. Unless I abdicate my throne or abdicate the kingdom, or volunteer my kingdom away, um I lose my equity, of course, if I volunteer anything away. But anyway, finally, everything elucidated via this authentic, mature, and diplomatic. Let's go to diplomatic. You already kind of brought this up. Diplomatic. So Diplomatic 1A says paleographic, P-A-L-E-O-G-R-A-P-H-I-C paleographic. One B says, and here it is, exactly reproducing the original. Does my body today, sixty-five years later, evidence the exact same 46 chromosomes as the original monozygotic maritime monarchy?

SPEAKER_02 1:00:49

And no one but you has those. Nor every will have those.

SPEAKER_04 1:00:54

Right. There's no war over the king.

SPEAKER_01 1:00:56

There is no war over the kingdom.

SPEAKER_06 1:00:59

Uh-uh.

SPEAKER_01 1:01:02

When I say all present and accounted for from fertilization of last breath, I'm including all the time in the womb, both the first estate, the second estate, and the third estate. If you look at the estates of the realm, they're all one lifetime. They're all one lifetime. And there's no break. There's no fault. It's faultless.

SPEAKER_06 1:01:22

Absolutely.

SPEAKER_01 1:01:23

Until somebody until somebody attempts to break it up. Um paleographic, let's click on paleographic.

SPEAKER_06 1:01:31

What does it say?

SPEAKER_04 1:01:33

Look at this. Paleographic.

SPEAKER_01 1:01:38

Relating to writings of former times. Is not that, is the birth record not an attempt to be a writing of former times which evidence the time in the womb?

SPEAKER_05 1:01:54

Yes.

SPEAKER_01 1:01:55

So the birth record is considered diplomatic because it has a piece of me on a piece of mom. And the only time that occurred was in the womb in the uterine wall. So I come out of the waters in the first estate and land, I come out of the heavens, there's my heavenly kingdom, and it comes down and lands in the uterine wall, the second estate.

SPEAKER_04 1:02:22

So the evidence of me coming from the heavens and coming to Earth via mom's uterine wall, there's a piece of paper, a plane P L-A-N-E of existence.

SPEAKER_01 1:02:40

That is a it's it's paleographic. It's a writing relating or representing, representing the phetomaternal placenta, which evidences my arrival here from the heavens to earth, to Mother Earth.

SPEAKER_04 1:03:00

And that's the birth record.

SPEAKER_01 1:03:02

So they're saying that this rel some this writing, this birth record, it relates to the former times, times in front of where we are today.

SPEAKER_06 1:03:13

Right.

SPEAKER_01 1:03:14

So but but here's the problem, Linda. There's a time stamp or or the what they're using for that paleographic evidence is the Gregorian calendar, the civil calendar.

SPEAKER_04 1:03:33

So now whoever created that calendar, that time frame, that time is gonna lay claim to it.

SPEAKER_01 1:03:50

So whoever whoever created the paperwork, whoever authorized that paperwork, those forms, that calendar, they're gonna lay claim to the character born B-O-R-N-E, to that time frame.

SPEAKER_04 1:04:11

It becomes an alternate universe. And and and on their paleographic diplomatic page, I don't have any control over it.

SPEAKER_01 1:04:28

Because what they have on that record, that record, is an infant. And that infancy is legally incapacitated. So I can't speak for that character. It requires an attorney, the Bar Association. So the only people that can speak to that paleographic diplomatic plain P L A-N-E of existence. I say plain because it's an XY axis folio page. It's a page that represents the time in the womb, the former times in the womb. But that's that might be their interpretation, Linda. Because if I go back to diplomatic, it says exactly reproducing the original. That's me. Do I need a piece of paper to exist?

SPEAKER_04 1:05:23

No. If all the paper in the world burned today, would I still be here? Yes. Yeah. So I don't need a piece of paper.

SPEAKER_01 1:05:34

I don't need the word. In the beginning was the word. No, it wasn't. Biology preceded the word. Long before man could speak was man's biology. Long before the Gutenberg press or anything on paper was man's biology. The word did not exist before the biology, Linda. I'm I'm first in time.

SPEAKER_02 1:05:54

Yeah, absolutely. Had to have the biology. Yeah, had to have the

SPEAKER_01 1:06:00

voice box in the hand to reproduce anything to write anything it's always second hand it's always second hand it's always it's always behind me because I'm the only thing happening in the present moment most people don't even understand what the present moment actually is Linda before I say what I'm about to say is the future but I already said it and I only say it I only speak I I only breathe in the present my spirit and my existence is only in the present moment but the moment I say it the moment I live it the moment I express it is past and now it's it's behind me but as long as I'm still breathing everything I do is present and as long as I'm still living and I'm present everything I produce all thoughts all product all inventions everything biologically genetically whatever as long as I'm present I have access to it in the present because I only exist today I only exist in the present moment which means I should always have access to it today when I say I need this that I created five what we're gonna call five weeks ago I need it today it should still be accessible to me today directly I shouldn't have to go through some middleman that that is working with the historical record because it's not in history to me it didn't pass away into some other other realm it's still here the car I bought the truck I bought in in 2017 is still on my driveway it's I can look out the window and look right at it but somebody's gonna say oh no that truck came into your possession in 2017 so now it's on the historical record and you have to go through all the middlemen to then evidence proof of ownership no it's right there right out on my driveway right now in the present moment and I'm the owner I don't need a piece of paper to evidence ownership I'm the owner unless somebody comes and tries to steal it from me or take it from me but guess what that's a crime I know I'm the owner and so does somebody trying to steal it from me. Right they know I'm the owner but they might get me to register it onto some historical record so that they control the truck but I'm the owner I don't need to fucking register and put it in some trust subject to thieves I knew a guy in Denver who I mean he did have he used to get stopped all the time because he speeded um but he would he would have his um bill of sale in his car and he'd just hand it to the police and they'd leave him alone ownership means it's not held in trust exactly if I'm the owner I don't need to have my property held by you now understand that the Gregorian calendar or the civil calendar is a trust it's it's that record is a trust. So everything that's registered to that is held in trust but if I am here why do I need to have somebody else act as a middleman I don't need that but you know what they did that they created all that as far as I'm concerned whoever created that Linda is liable for their creation so all liability falls on them if their character's in an accident they're liable whatever character born to the calendar whoever created that character is liable for everything that character does doesn't matter what it is they're liable for that's their character they created it liability somebody asked me about that the other day Kurt if you're the owner you're liable yes I am I'll take it I'd love I love full liability because if I have full liability I'm the only voice I'm the only one that gets to speak for that property to that property about that property. Nobody else gets to share in that property with me nobody gets to speak about that property. Well you you you need to have a permit no I don't my property this is the difference between knowledge and ownership and stupidity children are the ones that need that kind of help infants minors whatever whatever words you want to use yes but even when I was younger I'm the owner I'm always the owner I'm always the owner from fertilization to last breath I'm always the owner anything that my energy anything that my existence produces is mine it allows me then to exchange my efforts with the efforts of others that's the only thing I have to offer a value for value exchange I do this and you do that and I I need your your tomatoes and and you need my expertise we trade I'm not saying barter is good I'm just saying that the energy my product my output my labor whatever you want to call it is mine but if I put it on somebody else's timeline if I if I if I redirect it and go through some conduit somebody else's creature somebody else's creation I it's not mine anymore or somebody else's fairy franchise which we talked about earlier anyway so diplomatic dispatch let's go to dispatch diplomatic dispatch are you there um now remember as the author you pick the definition Linda diplomatic dispatch go just go down to two the act of dispatching such as then it says obsolete dismissal or one two C one the prompt settlement of an item of business promptness and efficiency in performance or transmission a dispatch promptness and efficiency in performance or transmission I don't know that I can be any more efficient Linda I tell you the greatest my efficiency is all in one line all present and accounted for from fertilization to last breath that's it right there that's I can't get any more efficient than that.

SPEAKER_04 1:14:19

But dismissal let's see what dismissal says the act of dismissing the fact or state of being dismissed I'm dismissing what who am I dismissing?

SPEAKER_01 1:14:32

Let's go to see what dismissing means to remove from position or service to discharge to reject serious consideration of something or someone 3B says to put an action out of judicial consideration I'm dismissing it well or refuse to hear an action or to hear an action further in court but look at the law says to put an action out of judicial consideration should my at should any piece of my monarchy be considered at any moment if it if it's extraterritorial no it's outside my origin it's it's outside of all jurisdictions. Everything we're doing but this is this is the act of dismissing to put an action out of judicial consideration consideration remember that consideration is part of an agreement or a contract but consideration is what you put into it what happens if I remove my biology from their their consideration because if my biology is consideration if my DNA is consideration I'm a slave. I'm a servant that's a servitude a man can't have a servitude over his own property rezua namini servant no one can have a servitude over his own property you need to remove your property and we are this is an authentic mature diplomatic dispatch and it says proves beyond a reasonable doubt let's go to prove P R O B E to prove this is crazy to establish the existence truth or validity of as by evidence or logic but look at this one B says to demonstrate as having a particular quality or worth remember the definition of war is competition over a particular end. If I have knowledge of fertilization which is my true godly origin and I'm still using the exact stain forty six chromosome biology that's a particular quality my existence I'm what I'm saying I am self-evident my monarchy is self-evident because it originates at fertilization now it's gonna get weird here in in a little bit when I go down this other path but you got to understand that the 46 chromosome body I'm using today has evolved through a seamless or faultless evolutionary due process from the single cell the zygote to this moment nothing impedes that evolutionary due process. I'm here the the fact that I'm here now evidences that I was there at the moment of fertilization and whatever happened between the moment of creation i.e fertilization and this moment is just part of the duration or part of the evolutionary due process so I'm in the water I'm in the womb and now here I sit you've you've tested the truth validity and genuineness of you've proven it everything um and that's what it is this has nothing this is where it gets weird for people is they they're waiting for somebody to validate somebody else to validate they're waiting for a response the biggest thing that people say to me is Kurt have you got any response from anybody I'm not expecting any Linda because it's already true what I'm saying is already true. What are they gonna do? Validate the truth who has the authority who has the power to validate the truth no one but you nobody it's truth is self-evident if you if you go contrary to to what is self-evident that's insanity you're insane to go with what's right in front of you you're insane to deny that's why I'm saying that these courts that deny reality because they have a piece of paper in front of them an infant an infant record that they're working with they're gonna say well this is all I got to work with they're denying what they know to be true. That's fraud they know what they're doing Linda yes that's deception the intent is to deceive but they need you to agree to it because once you agree to it then it becomes a voluntary act and now all of a sudden equity doesn't aid a volunteer so they need you no matter how scary it gets they need you to admit to the infancy the incapacity that's what they're trying to get you to do the moment you admit to the birthday Linda how many times did you come out of the womb? Once once how many times do you do you have to celebrate your arrival once once okay diplomatic dispatch proves beyond a reasonable doubt well I'm gonna go to reasonable doubt let's see what it says reasonable doubt um we'll see what it let's see what comes up here I'm gonna go to Cornell let's see what Cornell says reasonable doubt WEX US law Cornell reasonable doubt is the level of uncertainty that prevents jurors in a criminal case from finding a defendant guilty it is the highest burden of proof in law and requires that the prosecution prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. If such doubt exists the jury must acquit can you imagine standing in front of a jury or sitting in a chair in front of a jury where they can see you where they're looking right at you and they're saying that you're an infant based upon a record the only record that exists that you're an infant. Now physically it's obvious you are not but the record says you're an infant and you've already admitted to it which is the only reason you're in that courtroom to begin with by the way but now you're in this courtroom where they're dealing with a record that only evidences infancy so I guess I one thing I have to do is I I have to go to infancy um or infant legal.

SPEAKER_00 1:23:21

Let's just see what it says here.

SPEAKER_01 1:23:25

I'll go to infant and I'll just go to Webster's and I'll see if Webster's has a legal definition for infant because infant at Webster says a child in the first period of life that makes sense a person who is not of full age a minor so a minor is also considered an infant um intended for young children being in an early stage of development of relating to or being in infancy of course if we go to infancy etymology online it'll lead to infantry and infantry is a is infants collectively which is um the afterbirth material in a public pool which is the collection of infant biology but let's see if I can find a legal definition for infant infant kids there medical definition legal definition so a medical definition of an infant is a child in the first year of life a baby a child several several years of age and a person who is not a full age a minor well I'm 65 years old plus so I can't by any definition so far be considered an infant.

SPEAKER_00 1:24:38

And then it says a person who is not the age of majority a minor I'm gonna just click on minor and see what it says I'm gonna go to infant in black saw let's just see what it says there infant I forget I I didn't have black saw down in Florida so I forgot that I have access to it.

SPEAKER_01 1:25:03

Infants Infancy infant infants infant infancy child infancy minor so infancy there it is I knew there was something here really weird here um infancy I I I'm at black saw page six ninety nine infancy minority the state of a person who is under the age of a legal minority or majority now I have to do this I I did it a couple calls ago but I have to do it now. It says the state of a person who is under the age of legal majority at common law 21 years now generally 18 but it says the state of a person the state of a person I'm gonna go to Montevideo convention this is gonna take a minute Montevideo convention and I'm gonna go to the actual convention document although web although Wikipedia is fine too I'm gonna go to the actual Montevideo convention it's called the Montevideo Convention on rights and duties of states take a minute for it to pop up okay so article one this is December 26 1933 Linda the same year that birth certificates were issued the same year FDR this is a day in his in his first inaugural address this is a day of national consecration so he created a holy nation national consecration consecration is to make holy national means nation so a holy nation this is a day of national consecration he created a holy nation and then he issued deeds to the ground of that holy ground deeds deeds to the holy ground which I just described as the birth certificated person it is the birth certificated

SPEAKER_04 1:28:00

Certificated person, which is the deed to the holy ground. That's the birth certificate. Okay, so I'm at Article One. This is weird. It says the state as a person. So the word person now is the state. And the birth certificated person is the state.

SPEAKER_01 1:28:34

It says here the state as a person, the state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications. A a permanent population.

SPEAKER_04 1:28:47

Now remember, the birth certificate is consecrated ground, holy ground, holy land, a holy nation.

SPEAKER_01 1:28:57

And that certificate has a piece of it, it only gives it only exists because of the fetal maternal placenta. That's the deposit. That's the biology they're writing this birth certificate on. It has a piece of me, which came from the heavens, and a piece of mom from earth. So my heavenly body, a piece of it, is still on a piece of mom. So there's a pe there's a holy relic on the ground, found on the ground.

SPEAKER_04 1:29:33

The piece of me is my 46 chromosome kingdom. It's my biology.

SPEAKER_01 1:29:42

It evidences my infancy in the womb. My infancy. It says the state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a permanent population. Well, it's a population of one. Who's on that? Who's on that ground?

SPEAKER_02 1:30:01

You are. Your DNA.

SPEAKER_01 1:30:04

My DNA, the fallen man or the fallen angel or whatever, is on that ground permanently. Does it do they ever extract, do they ever take my biology off of the maternal portion of the placenta? Do they ever extract it? Do they ever separate my biology from mom's biology with the fetomaternal placental organ?

SPEAKER_02 1:30:26

No.

SPEAKER_01 1:30:27

No. So a piece of me is always on that ground. Always. And they got a record of it. But the definition of record is an unsurpassed statistic, which means that that piece of me, that infant biology, is never surpassed. But it does evidence my coming out of the heavens, Heavenly Father, out of the heavens, landing on earth. So it's the heavenly biology, the holy land is my mom's ground, and it's only holy because of my heavenly body that is there. But it says the state, as a person of international law, should possess the following qualifications. A, a permanent population. It has a permanent population of one infant. My biology is still on it. B, a defined territory. That's the accretion. That's mom's uterine wall biology. It's defined. It's called an island. It's an island territory. It's an insular territory.

SPEAKER_04 1:31:35

C, a government. Well, when I know about it, I govern it.

SPEAKER_01 1:31:43

But if I don't know about it, it falls into the government of another or under the government of another.

SPEAKER_04 1:31:50

Right. Which government claims the human creature in 1302? The Catholic Church. The Pope, yes. The Pope is saying that that human creature belongs to the pontiff.

SPEAKER_01 1:32:10

And I'm this I this is just deductive reasoning. So the government of that holy ground, that holy land. By the way, what calendar marks that occasion of the arrival of the Holy Land? Or memorializes the Holy Land? What I'm sorry, I was talking. What?

SPEAKER_02 1:32:33

The Gregorian calendar.

SPEAKER_01 1:32:35

And and who created the Gregorian calendar? Who created the Gregorian calendar? Who created the Gregorian calendar that memorializes me coming from the heavens?

SPEAKER_02 1:32:47

The Pope Gregory of the Catholic Church.

SPEAKER_01 1:32:51

In what year?

SPEAKER_04 1:32:53

Uh uh.

SPEAKER_01 1:32:56

1582. 1582.

SPEAKER_02 1:33:01

I can't keep chasing my head.

SPEAKER_01 1:33:03

It doesn't matter. It doesn't matter, Linda. It's gonna come out no matter what. So it has a government.

SPEAKER_04 1:33:13

Yeah.

SPEAKER_01 1:33:13

And it's that a government. The Catholic Church is a government. There's no doubt about it. The Vatican City has a government.

SPEAKER_06 1:33:24

Mm-hmm.

SPEAKER_01 1:33:26

And then D, the capacity to enter into relations, and all I have to do is go to Roman Catholic Church, and I'll do that real quick.

SPEAKER_04 1:33:41

There it is. Roman Catholic Church.

SPEAKER_01 1:33:43

The juristic personality of the Roman Catholic Church. So the Roman Catholic Church, by definition, is the juristic personality. The juristic personality is Isaiah 9.6. It's biblical. So I'm going to Isaiah 9.6. Isaiah 9.6. And it says, and it's describing the birth certificated person, Linda. It says, For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given, and the government shall be upon his shoulder. And his name shall be called wonderful, comma, counselor, comma, the mighty God, counselor, the everlasting father, comma, the prince of peace. So this fetal maternal placenta, which evidences my arrival from the heavens onto Mother Earth, mom's uterine wall, the remains of my arrival, the ark itself, the vessel I was in, is on that ground. And they give a they create a birth record, which I call Isaiah 9.6, because it's evidencing that it is the government. The birth certificated character is the government.

SPEAKER_04 1:34:58

Over that ground. And it has the capacity, let me finish Roman Catholic Church here. Roman Catholic Church.

SPEAKER_01 1:35:33

That's 325. That could be, you know. But what I'm getting is it it already has the capacity to do this with other states. So that that's a state. What's really weird is Article 2, Linda, right below Article 1, it says the federal state shall constitute a sole person in the eyes of international law. So they're they're they call they said the federal state. So this piece of ground, this holy land ground with the birth certificated Isaiah 9.6 is the federal state.

SPEAKER_04 1:36:16

Go to Etymology Online. And go to and go to federal. Look at what it says. Sixteen forties as a theological term in reference to covenants between God and man. Isn't that amazing? Yeah.

SPEAKER_01 1:36:42

Now, what's really cool is and I've never spoke of this before because but we're talking about the Montevideo Convention of 20 of 26 December 1933, the same year that the the uh the memorials, i.e. the the holy land deeds, the birth certificates, were issued. They started to be issued that that year. Well, the secular meaning to federal says pertaining to a covenant or treaty, led to a political sense formed by agreement among independent states. Independent states formed by agreement among independent states. So this federal state, Linda, so I come in on September 19th, 1960, at 3 50 a.m. I come out of mom according to their timeline. Or actually, I came out earlier, but this is the record. But I come out of mom onto what would appear to be the United States of America through Illinois soil, Illinois being entering the United States of America, 1818. So it would look like I came out of the extraterritorial waters or mere incognitum waters of mother, the land in onto Illinois soil, which would make me, which I would arrive to Illinois. United States of America, the United States of America. But the Montevideo Convention was talking about American states. They're not talking about the United States, they're talking about American states. Now you look at federal, and it says formed by agreement among independent states.

SPEAKER_04 1:38:39

So my independent state, Linda, is the island territory. That's the federal. That's the federal. By the way, there are two types of law: the law of the sea and the law of the land. My monozygotic maritime monarchy was created where, Linda? In the water. In the water, maritime. That's the federal state. My forty-six chromosomes, Linda, is of the water.

SPEAKER_01 1:39:25

My forty-six chromosomes is of the water. It's maritime. So they created a federal state for my kingdom.

SPEAKER_04 1:39:35

Independent. Are you following this? Yes. Yes.

SPEAKER_01 1:39:48

So my kingdom is of the water, Linda. And yet the US Constitution, Illinois, is on the land. But my but that's why I call my monozygotic maritime monarchy waterborne land-based.

SPEAKER_02 1:40:05

Yeah.

SPEAKER_04 1:40:07

When you look at the back cover of First in Time, the second book, there's a boat on an island. My boat evidences my maritime origin. The island is the land. When you put them together, you have your sovereignty. So my kingdom landed. Go ahead.

SPEAKER_02 1:40:37

Well, so then Article true two is true for me. The federal state shall constitute a sole person in the eyes of international law. Soul being the definition of soul being being only one, having no sharer, functioning independently and without assistance or interference.

SPEAKER_01 1:41:00

And but it says in international law.

SPEAKER_04 1:41:04

Mm-hmm. Not domestic. No.

SPEAKER_01 1:41:09

So international law is the only place your sovereignty can be recognized because it's federal. The federal government is dealing at the international level, not domestically.

SPEAKER_04 1:41:28

Domestic would be Illinois.

SPEAKER_01 1:41:38

Illinois is saying, uh-uh, we have we have a deposit on our ground that was abandoned.

SPEAKER_04 1:41:50

We have it. So Illinois is saying that just like in Haslam versus Lockwood, we have first dibs on that deposit. This is church and state stuff.

SPEAKER_01 1:42:13

Um it goes on to Federal goes on to say um formed by agreement among independent states. 1707.

SPEAKER_04 1:42:26

When was the Declaration of Independence written?

SPEAKER_03 1:42:32

1776.

SPEAKER_04 1:42:34

Right. So they already knew this.

SPEAKER_01 1:42:39

From the uh it says from the use of the word in federal union, union based on a treaty popularized during the formation of the United States of America. They have U period, S period, A period, 1776 to 1787, and like phrases. It goes on to say, also from this period in U.S. history comes the sense of favoring a central government. A central government. Used from 1861 in reference to the northern forces in the American Civil War. Northern. But I want to get back to this thing before I forget it. Favoring the central government.

SPEAKER_04 1:43:43

Okay, I'm going to go back to the book of Sound Mind, and I am going to the word nuclear.

SPEAKER_01 1:43:56

Second paragraph, Linda. It says, through an act of God known as fertilization, which is the first estate which is in the water, my personal and private waterborne nuclear kingdom, nuclear kingdom, monarchy, was created as a singular 46 chromosome celestial body. Definition of nuclear. Of relating to or constituting a nucleus.

SPEAKER_04 1:44:21

Now I'm going to go to the word nucleus. Nucleus. At Websters. What does it say?

SPEAKER_02 1:44:51

Well, I was looking at number two, a central point group or mass about which gathering, concentration, or accretion takes place.

SPEAKER_01 1:45:01

Okay, central point. A central point, a central point, a central point. Federal. I'm going back to federal.

SPEAKER_04 1:45:11

Favoring a central government. Yes. The central point is the nucleus.

SPEAKER_01 1:45:21

And but it says a central point group or mass about which gathering concentration or accretion takes place. What?

SPEAKER_04 1:45:29

Where does this occur?

SPEAKER_02 1:45:35

In the waters.

SPEAKER_01 1:45:36

No, it doesn't. Because it says or accretion takes place. So the central point group or mass about which gathering concentration or accretion takes place? What is the central? Where does the accretion occur? Where does the accretion occur? In the womb.

SPEAKER_04 1:45:55

But what causes the accretion?

SPEAKER_01 1:45:59

The fertilization and the No, what call what I'm talking bio physically, Linda, what causes the accretion? Fertilization is an event. It isn't a ca it isn't a thing. What is the thing fertilization produces? The zygote. What does the zygote do after seven days?

SPEAKER_02 1:46:23

It implants into the wall of the uterus.

SPEAKER_01 1:46:26

So so the accretion occurs because of this implantation, but what caused the accretion?

SPEAKER_04 1:46:36

Implantation. The zygote. Yeah, that's what he said.

SPEAKER_01 1:46:41

No, it's you're not agreeing with me right now. Implantation is an event.

SPEAKER_04 1:46:47

Linda, implantation is an event. It is not the zygote. No. But you just said it was.

SPEAKER_01 1:46:54

You said implantation caused the accretion.

SPEAKER_02 1:46:58

But I said zygote.

SPEAKER_01 1:47:03

Yes, the zygote is the same. There's a difference between events and substance. I'm trying to get to what they're calling the central. What's the central point, Linda?

SPEAKER_02 1:47:14

The zygote.

SPEAKER_01 1:47:16

The zygote is the nucleus, is the central point. What is it though? Ultimately, what is what is that?

SPEAKER_04 1:47:24

What is the zygote? It's it's my origin. It's the monozygotic maritime monarchy.

SPEAKER_05 1:47:36

Yes.

SPEAKER_01 1:47:38

Which is the central point, which is the federal state. Yes. The favoring the central government. The central government lands in the uterine wall. The nucleus, which is the the the very thing itself. My kingdom comes out of the heavens, lands into the uterine wall, but my kingdom is the central government that lands in the uterine wall.

SPEAKER_04 1:48:05

Yes. That's the federal state. Thank you.

SPEAKER_01 1:48:12

Now, what I'm trying to get at is the difference between events, things happening, and the product of those happenings is the biology.

SPEAKER_06 1:48:23

Yeah.

SPEAKER_01 1:48:24

And the hardest part for people to get is the fact that it's all biology. They're telling a story. And in fact, the one word that trips everybody up in all the courtrooms is the word event. It's an event. But what's the event? The event is implantation. But what's implanting the kingdom?

SPEAKER_02 1:48:45

The zent government.

SPEAKER_01 1:48:47

The kingdom is the central government. Yes. So the monarchy, you're you're you were about to say it. The monarchy is the central government. What happens when it gets cut off of me? What happens when my where I am right now, Linda, 65 years later? I'm the my mind is the government over that biology. What happens when it's separated?

SPEAKER_02 1:49:11

I lose. I lose control.

SPEAKER_01 1:49:14

You lose the island. You lose, you lose that that island doesn't have a central government anymore.

SPEAKER_06 1:49:22

Right.

SPEAKER_01 1:49:22

Because you're it. You're all there is, unless you give it to somebody else.

SPEAKER_03 1:49:28

So I lose the case.

SPEAKER_01 1:49:33

That's equity. Once the government abandons the island, once you don't know that it exists, all this stuff, if you really, really think what's going on here. There's only three things that exist, and not even three things, Linda. Two things exist. Your 46 chromosome monozygotic maritime monarchy that appears for the first time ever as a zygote. But that zygote and the body you're using today are they have. It has the identical information.

SPEAKER_00 1:50:02

Right.

SPEAKER_01 1:50:03

Same 46 chromosomes. So those that's one thing. The one cell, which is the monarchy, and the body you're using today is the monarchy. They're both the monarchy. That's it. From fertilization to last breath, it's the monarchy. But there's a stop, there's a middle ground. There's a piece of ground that you land in.

SPEAKER_04 1:50:24

The body you're using today. Where's it located? It's on the land. But it's of the water. Yes.

SPEAKER_01 1:50:36

It's of the water. I don't care if you walk across your yard right now, it's of the water. You're using the vessel born in the water. Yes. But you're using it on the land. So the constitution does not apply to the first estate because it's the law of the land.

SPEAKER_04 1:50:58

Right. So does the federal state apply to the law of the land? No. No, it applies in in the maritime admiralty world.

SPEAKER_01 1:51:12

That's why everybody's confused. The body you have right now, when you walk into the courtroom, is it on the land or is it of the water?

SPEAKER_02 1:51:21

It's on the land.

SPEAKER_01 1:51:22

It's of the water.

SPEAKER_02 1:51:25

And of the water. It is on the land.

SPEAKER_01 1:51:27

There is no and there is no and it's there is no and, Linda.

SPEAKER_02 1:51:33

Okay. I see.

SPEAKER_01 1:51:34

The reason I'm saying this is the reason they're flying Admiralty flags in the courts is because you're of the water.

SPEAKER_02 1:51:42

Yes, I am of the water. My orders of the water. I am of the water.

SPEAKER_01 1:51:47

But everybody wants to be the man on the land.

SPEAKER_02 1:51:50

Yeah.

SPEAKER_04 1:51:52

The Constitution does not apply to waterborne vessels. No. That's why I'm screaming. That's why I'm screaming.

SPEAKER_01 1:52:04

I'm trying to get to this thing that nobody's ever heard before.

SPEAKER_04 1:52:07

Yeah, thank you.

SPEAKER_01 1:52:09

Maybe that's okay. I'm so glad that screaming is over because I I'm trying to get I'm just seeing it for the first time, and uh, and it's making me angry because when you use this 46 chromosome monozygotic maritime monarchy, and you walk into a courtroom and then you're all bent because they got m admiralty flags flying. It's because you're of the water, your kingdom is of the water.

SPEAKER_06 1:52:36

Right.

SPEAKER_01 1:52:36

But you're at war, you're in commerce because of the cut, and you can't figure out no, I'm on the land.

SPEAKER_04 1:52:44

No, you're not. The law of the land does not apply to your vessel. No.

SPEAKER_02 1:52:55

Because you're stupid to even think that if it's a vessel.

unknown 1:53:00

No.

SPEAKER_01 1:53:02

Well, so so my point is the federal state is your boat. It's it's it's the s waterborne aspect of your existence.

SPEAKER_06 1:53:11

Yeah.

SPEAKER_04 1:53:12

The waterborne.

SPEAKER_01 1:53:14

But what they did, Linda, is they created that. Remember, we've already had this conversation. So there's there's you're in the water. You're the there's the law of the sea. I don't care if it's the marinognetum water's the mother. It doesn't matter. The water, there's the law of the sea, and there's the law of the land. But they created a shoreline that is temporary. It only works with the light of the moon or whatever. It doesn't matter, but there's a shoreline. High tide, there's only water and land. Low tide exposes this weird shoreline that does not exist in law.

SPEAKER_04 1:53:52

The shoreline, Linda, is the accretion. Wow.

SPEAKER_01 1:54:00

There's no doubt that if I mean when you were sitting next to me here at the computer, we were on the land. There's no doubt we're on the land. But we're born of the water. So you come from the water onto the land. But this birth record, it evidences the shoreline, where you the point where you transitioned from water to land. And it's the transition. That's the purgatory. That's where everybody's lost. They're lost at that transition. Because somebody else controls that toll booth, that toll.

SPEAKER_04 1:54:38

You can't get to the land because you're a maritime vessel. You can't get to the land unless you get permission through the birth record. But that's infancy.

SPEAKER_01 1:54:52

So now you can't get to the land. You need the ferry franchise to get you from the water to the land. But the ferry franchise is the is the bar association.

SPEAKER_02 1:55:04

But I only that's only if I Yeah, that's only if I volunteer into that. Otherwise I'm all present and accounted for on fertilization.

SPEAKER_01 1:55:20

Right. Those but that's only those that those of us that know that.

SPEAKER_02 1:55:23

Right.

SPEAKER_01 1:55:24

I ask you this all the time, but I mean how many people even recognize fertilization as their as their origin? Nobody. And then finally this idea.

SPEAKER_04 1:55:41

Go ahead.

SPEAKER_02 1:55:42

Well the second just I want to make sure I'm clear on this. On the month of the federal state shall constitute a sole person in the eyes of international law. So the federal state is you there?

SPEAKER_03 1:56:06

Did I lose ya?

SPEAKER_02 1:56:08

It's my federal is my covenant, man's covenant with God. The state is maritime.

SPEAKER_04 1:56:18

No. Be careful.

SPEAKER_03 1:56:20

No. Okay.

SPEAKER_04 1:56:22

The federal state. The federal state. Remember there's two states. There's Illinois and then there's the federal state. Yeah?

SPEAKER_01 1:56:35

One is one is on the land, one is one is part of the United States of America, which has the Constitution and it's the law of the land. That's Illinois as part of that. But do I ever reach Illinois?

SPEAKER_04 1:56:49

No.

SPEAKER_01 1:56:50

No. Because they created a federal state through the Montevideo Convention and then they issued birth records for the federal state, which is all waterborne. You never make it to land.

SPEAKER_02 1:57:04

Got it.

SPEAKER_01 1:57:05

You're always on the sea of commerce based upon the fact that Article IV of the United States Constitution allows Congress to create new states. New states. Go to Article IV of the United States Constitution and look up new states, and you'll see that they created a state that they control completely. The federal government is controlling this state completely.

SPEAKER_04 1:57:31

But they're only controlling it because of our ignorance of our true godly origin. They're not the enemy because truth doesn't have enemies, Linda. There is no enemy but our own ignorance.

SPEAKER_01 1:57:50

Remember that the back cover of this book has Cruden versus Neil on it. The very last line that I use for Cruden vs. Neil is every man is independent of all laws.

SPEAKER_04 1:58:04

Except those prescribed by nature. When does man's nature begin? Right.

SPEAKER_01 1:58:17

Man's nature doesn't begin at conception or implantation, it doesn't begin there. So when when you buy into or subscribe to the conception, you have abandoned nature. And now all of man's laws, statutes, codes, they all apply to you because you've abandoned or you're no longer aligned with nature. Cruden versus Neil becomes so obvious. Every man's independent of all laws. Not some, not most, all laws, except those prescribed by nature. Nature begins at fertilization. When you're in alignment with nature, none of this other shit applies to you. That's a monarchy. That's a foreign monarchy.

SPEAKER_04 1:59:03

So I mean what's really weird about this is one you one USC eight supports that too. Right? It supports it as a separate entity.

SPEAKER_01 1:59:20

One USC eight only exists because of the cut. When there's no cut, there's no one USC eight. Because that's an act of Congress. So they clamp and cut the cord, which is evidencing your godly origin, which is also known as a particular end. One USC eight is a particular end that everybody's fighting over. That particular end gives rise to a patent, that particular end gives rise to a patented composition of matter, which is the federal territory, which is equity.

SPEAKER_02 1:59:59

So there's the federal state in Article 2 of the Monte Visto is the equity.

SPEAKER_04 2:00:18

Yeah.

SPEAKER_01 2:00:19

You you you your existence begins at fertilization. The legal fiction begins at conception. If you admit to the legal fiction and do not know your true godly origin, you are volunteering away your equity. Yes.

SPEAKER_04 2:00:43

The whole man exists from fertilization to last breath. All of this other stuff is what's the word?

SPEAKER_00 2:00:51

What am I looking for?

SPEAKER_01 2:00:55

It's a it's a libel. It's it's a libel. L-I-B-E-L, but what's an what what is the document I just spoke of a couple weeks ago?

SPEAKER_04 2:01:05

Defamation in fiction.

SPEAKER_01 2:01:10

It's a defamation in fiction. The legal fiction is defamation because it doesn't include fertilization, it doesn't include your true origin. So it reduces you to less than a man or a human being. The word man is scary because I'm a man sitting here, but humanity begins at fertilization. And so they're gonna say, well, a man and humanity are different things because humanity is is just a bunch, a group of cells. Fertilization results in a single cell. That's not a man. No, but it produces a man, but it's not a man, but it produces a man, but it's not a man, but it produces a man. You see the argument, they're gonna keep saying it's not a man, because it isn't a man, it's a it's a single cell. But the 46 chromosomes within it, through evolutionary due process, turns into the man. But because of re because of religious beliefs and the religious beliefs trying to negate evolution, the evolutionary due process, they're saying that no, no, no, no. You're always a man, and that's all there is. There is no evolution. So the church is taking all of the early version of your biology because that's where you begin. And they're saying that's their whole Adam and Eve story. That's their Genesis story, that's their Genesis narrative. What happens if they don't get to claim that? What if they don't get to claim their biblical account of what's going on inside the womb, which is extraterritorial? What if they don't get that, Linda? What if the Roman Catholic Church doesn't get to claim the shit that they've ruled the earth? They've punished everybody, Linda, for centuries. Because they could, because everybody was stupid, everybody was ignorant. Well now some of us aren't.

SPEAKER_05 2:03:10

Mm-hmm.

SPEAKER_02 2:03:12

So an etymology produce an etymology produce is to bring into being our existence. And it also says in front of.

SPEAKER_04 2:03:29

In front of That's the fertilization, is fertilization in front of inception? Yes. Yeah.

SPEAKER_01 2:03:43

I'm this this this paragraph is weird because it's not a there there isn't a lot in it, but we're kind of trying to tie up a bunch of loose ends. Um it says proves beyond a reasonable doubt one's first in time dominion. First in time dominion. Well, nothing is in front of the moment of fertilization. So the event of creation, known as fertilization, produces the zygote. But the zygote evidences one's divinity where two vines are become one. The bloodline of mom and the bloodline of dad become one divine kingdom.

SPEAKER_04 2:04:24

Um the point is that that kingdom is first in time, it exists before as a nuclear kingdom, waterborne. Um and it has dominion over a rule of law.

SPEAKER_01 2:04:44

A rule of law. Now, this is where it gets interesting to me because the rule is a quantity, a quantity of law. Well, if law is the laws of nature and nature is God, then the rule of law, the measure of that, is evidencing your link to that creation or godly origin. If they cut that off of you and call it a federal state, then they're they have God on deposit.

SPEAKER_04 2:05:21

In God we trust. Right. But they're saying that that piece of you cut off is the rule or measure. But it's international. Remember, the federal state is international. Right. So you can't even get to it in a domestic court. Right. Yeah. You can't get there.

SPEAKER_01 2:05:46

The domestic court would be like an Illinois court or on the on the land. But this is oversea. This is in the water. This is Law of Nations stuff. This is United Nations stuff to keep the peace. We just have to, if you stay focused on the biology, you don't get mixed up with all of their nonsense. If you just look at the things happening biologically, and you go, oh, the measure, the the rule is a measure, it's a quantity. It could be a weight, it could be one pound of flesh, which is the average weight of or the average weight of a placenta. That's a weight, that's a measure.

SPEAKER_04 2:06:27

The rule of law could be the measure, the weight of the placenta, the pound of flesh. That they talk about in what? The merchant of Venice. So the rule of law. What happens when the rule of law is under your control?

SPEAKER_01 2:06:52

Through mind and memory? What if you know the rule of law what that is, what that entails? What if you know that it's the fetal maternal implantation or the memorial that's marking where you came out of the heavens and landed on earth? What if you know that?

SPEAKER_04 2:07:11

Then I'm by the way, then you already are whole. You already are whole.

SPEAKER_01 2:07:17

Yeah, but I know that I'm whole. Right. And now that now it's nothing. Because it's just the truth. See, this is this is the hardest part about all this crap that we have to go through every week, or you especially. Actually, me too. But the idea is that it's already true, Linda. The fact that you're sitting here, it's already true.

SPEAKER_00 2:07:41

But they're gonna get you to agree for the greater good to give up your life, to sacrifice yourself for the greater good.

SPEAKER_01 2:07:53

Um it says first in time dominion. I'm gonna go to the word dominion real quick. First of all, no, I'm not. We're at I'm at rule of law anyway. Oh, wait a minute. First in time. Dominion and rule of law. So let me see if I can find first in time legally. Let me see if first in time comes up. First in time. Um you know what? I actually have it on a document. Let me see if I get this on a document. First in time. Well, again, once we once we blow through this, there's not a whole lot left. So I mean, I'm not worried about time, even though we've been at this a while. I'm gonna go to see if I can find first in time.

SPEAKER_04 2:08:43

Uh maybe JTOR. JSTOR has it. There's one in Cornell. First in time. Well, I'm looking for a document where I can read I mean I can go get the book. But first in time burger. There it is. I found it. So or was that Nebraska? No, it's Nebraska. Nebraska.

SPEAKER_01 2:09:33

Let me go to this document because first in time is so huge. I mean, if fertilization happens before anything else in my I mean, the moment of creation, the moment of my existence. You can call it time if you want, I call it duration, or you and I call it duration, but first in time, the moment that monozygotic maritime monarchy exists, it's first.

SPEAKER_04 2:10:02

I don't know why it's not going up. Okay, I'm just gonna goog I'm gonna Google it real quick. Oh, here it is.

SPEAKER_01 2:10:19

It came up. This this this this is Nebraska Law Review, 1985, an analysis of the doctrine that first in time is first in right by Lawrence Berger. I'm gonna read one paragraph out of this because it explains everything regarding first in time. The whole doc the whole paper is worth reading, but most people won't do it anyway, so I don't get my hopes up.

SPEAKER_04 2:10:55

Hang on a second, my computer's really running slow.

SPEAKER_01 2:10:59

See, you know what's funny is if I had a bunch of money and I and I was operating through m unbelievable computers and things like that, this kind of shit wouldn't happen.

SPEAKER_04 2:11:08

You know what I mean?

SPEAKER_01 2:11:09

There it is.

SPEAKER_04 2:11:11

If I have it yet. So I'm just gonna go to the first page, or actually, there it is.

SPEAKER_01 2:11:24

It says, and this is the first paragraph, introduction, the notion that first in time is first in right is an ancient one. It determines the resolution of numerous human conflicts, both in law and custom. The legal rules about finding, comma, water rights, comma, nuisance, comma, prescription, comma, patents, comma, wild animals, comma, creditors' rights, comma, franchises, comma, recording and priorities in realty, comma, and Scores of other issues are wholly or partially governed by it. People follow it as unwritten law in their social interaction. That right there. First in time. You don't even need it written down. Everybody knows. I'm here first. You know what I mean? I call that. We did we did it as kids. So all of those things. That's like everything, Linda. So when you understand first in time, by the way, this was in the second book called First in Time. That was the name of the book. Okay, so I'm getting out of this because it's just too much. Yeah. Um, and I can get out of federal. But it but where was where was I going with this? Rule. Or no, I'm sorry. First in time. Uh reasonable doubt once first in time, dominion. So I was gonna go to Dominion. Sorry, I'm I have so many things in my head right now.

SPEAKER_04 2:13:01

I'm just trying to make sure I get them. Dominion. Dominion. Page 436 Black Black's Law, um, fifth edition.

SPEAKER_01 2:13:20

Dominion. Generally accepted definition of dominion is perfect control in right of ownership. The word implies both title and possession and appears to require a complete retention of control over disposition. Um sovereignty under dominion says, as a dominion of the seas over a territory.

SPEAKER_04 2:13:48

That's a federal state.

SPEAKER_01 2:13:52

The seas over dominion of the seas or over a territory. They're talking about the extraterritorial island. The fetal maternal placenta. That's an island territory.

SPEAKER_04 2:14:06

The United States calls it an insular possession.

SPEAKER_01 2:14:16

Okay, I'm not gonna go into dominion too much more because it's there's so much in there. It says first in time dominion, i.e. rule of law, over a formally consecrated just cogents mystery.

SPEAKER_04 2:14:33

Okay, so I'm gonna go to um just cogens. Um, but I'm gonna go to Just Cogin's at Wikipedia.

SPEAKER_01 2:14:55

When you go to Just Cogins, that's J-U-S space c O G E N S. When you go to Just Cogens at Wikipedia, it comes up as peremptory norm. P-E-R-E-M-P-T-O-R-Y norm, N-O-R-M. So peremptory norm, I'm at Wiki now. It says a peremptory norm, also called Just Cogins, is a fundamental principle, here it is, of international law that is accepted by the international community of states.

SPEAKER_04 2:15:30

Is that the federal state? Yes. Yeah, because is Illinois an international state?

SPEAKER_01 2:15:40

No. No, it's a domestic state within the United States of America. So it says is a fundamental principle of international law that is accepted by the international community of states as a as a norm from which no derogation is permitted. Thought to be so fundamental that it even invalidates rules drawn from treaty or custom. Norms of this character therefore cannot be derogated from by the will of the contracting parties. A peremptory norm or a just cogents, Linda, is that federal state. It's heaven and earth together in harmony. It's peaceable assembly, which is the First Amendment.

SPEAKER_04 2:16:30

It's peaceable assembly of heaven and earth.

SPEAKER_01 2:16:35

Um peremptory norm goes on to say at Article III of the Vienna Convention of the Law of Treaties defines just cogents norms as those that are accepted and recognized by the international community of states as a whole, as a norm from which no derogation is permitted and which can be modified only by a subsequent international norm of the same character. This means that even states objecting to the norm are bound by it. And any treaty of international agreement conflicting with the peremptory norm is void. So when you know the truth, Linda, from fertilization to last breath, that piece that was cut off of you is this just it is this just cogent's fundamental principle.

SPEAKER_04 2:17:23

And it's in international law, which is why you go to court and they're flying admiralty flags. Does that make sense?

SPEAKER_02 2:17:37

Yeah.

SPEAKER_04 2:17:38

Now I'm gonna go to the word fund. I'm sorry, what?

SPEAKER_02 2:17:42

I said I think I'm gonna finally get it.

SPEAKER_01 2:17:46

Don't it's it's hard. I just saw it. I just saw it for the first time yesterday or two days ago, and it and I couldn't wait to say it, but I couldn't get to it. I don't even know how to get to it. Remember that there were only two worlds, Linda. There's there's the the water world or law of the sea and law of the land.

SPEAKER_04 2:18:04

But they created this weird shoreline that exists at the international level. That shoreline is this just cogents state.

SPEAKER_03 2:18:18

It's the international.

SPEAKER_01 2:18:22

But it's also where it's it's it's you transitioning from the womb onto the land, and that transition is where the attorneys, the bar attorneys work as what?

SPEAKER_03 2:18:38

Middlemen, ferrymen.

SPEAKER_01 2:18:39

The ferryman, the fairy franchise.

SPEAKER_02 2:18:42

Yeah.

SPEAKER_01 2:18:43

The fairy franchise. That's what they're using. They're helping you get from the womb onto the land or reconnecting you with God from the land, uh you know, into the water. But they're pretending to be these middle the this middle ground middleman. Can you hear that talking? Okay. Well, whoever's on this call shouldn't be until I make it, until I post it. I can hear him talking.

SPEAKER_02 2:19:13

Really? Wow. Yeah, that's pretty bad.

SPEAKER_01 2:19:17

Well, whatever. So fundamental. It says per peremptory norm or just cogents is a fundamental principle. So I'm going to Webster's at fundamental. And this is where you start to see it. The just cogents aspect, that piece that was cut off of you is the rule of law, Linda.

SPEAKER_04 2:19:37

Yeah.

SPEAKER_01 2:19:39

It is the rule of law because it's your it's your link to God, which is your sovereignty. So when you allow your sovereignty to remain on deposit, or worse, let it die.

SPEAKER_04 2:19:54

Fundamental.

SPEAKER_01 2:19:55

Number one A says serving as a basis, supporting existence or determining essential essence structure or function. Basic. Uh one B says serving as an original or generating source. Primary. Primary. Serving as an original or generating source. Is that not the zygote?

SPEAKER_02 2:20:21

Yeah.

SPEAKER_01 2:20:22

I'm gonna but look at I'm gonna hurry and go down to number three real quick. Of central importance.

SPEAKER_04 2:20:30

Nuclear.

SPEAKER_01 2:20:33

And central importance says principle. P A L, P R P R I N C I P A L principal.

SPEAKER_04 2:20:40

So that's the principal deposit.

unknown 2:20:45

Yes.

SPEAKER_01 2:20:46

It's the principal deposit. It's it's the principal deposited on that island territory. Your 46 chromosome kingdom deposited on that ground, making it holy ground or holy land.

SPEAKER_05 2:21:00

Yes.

SPEAKER_01 2:21:01

I'm going back up to 1B where it says serving as an original or generating source.

SPEAKER_04 2:21:05

Primary. Primary. I'm going to primary.

SPEAKER_01 2:21:15

And it says first in order of time or development. Is the zygote the first, Linda?

SPEAKER_04 2:21:21

Yes.

SPEAKER_01 2:21:22

And it says primitive. Of course it is. It's the earliest version. It's a single cell. How much more primitive can it get? Um 2A says of first rank, importance, or value. Principle. Again. T A L. 2B says basic or fundamental. 2E says expressive of present or future time. So primary says expressive of present or future time. Not the past, Linda. So the the the the 46 chromosome biology that was deposited on that island, it says express. Will you guys shut the fuck up? Seriously.

SPEAKER_04 2:22:07

Get off the call. This is a private call. Um 3A says direct or first hand. It's a first first hand account.

SPEAKER_01 2:22:22

And then 3B says not derivable from other colors, odors, or tastes.

SPEAKER_04 2:22:28

So the color of law is off the table. Um preferatory to something else in a continuing process. Of relating to a primary school, of relating to a primary election. Um I'm looking just at anything that makes any sense to people. Um look at primary noun.

SPEAKER_01 2:22:58

Something that stands first stands first in rank, importance, or value, fundamental. Number two says the celestial body around which one or more other celestial bodies revolve, especially a more massive, usually brighter component of a binary star system. Binary. So what I'm trying to get at is this just cogents thing. I'm gonna go to now um just cogens at Cornell, and this is interesting because it says just cogents or compelling law. Compelling.

SPEAKER_04 2:23:48

Linda, they have a record that compels you. You're compelled to show up because it's true.

SPEAKER_01 2:23:58

You know, I mean, that's the second stop. I mean, you you it's it's you're waterborne. Your monarchy, your kingdom is waterborne. The fact that you deny it, you know, it doesn't make it true. What you're saying is, I'm a man on the land. I got that. But your the body that you have is it originated in the water. Um, just cogent says of or compelling law refers to the a category refers to a category of norms that govern customary international law. The Latin term is used interchangeably with the English term peremptory norm. Just cogents norm differs from other norms in two key aspects. First, as the translation suggests, just cogents norms are mandatory. They compel lawmakers to act in a specific manner. If a provision of a treaty conflicts with an existing just cogents norm, that provision is invalid insofar as it violates just cogents. You don't think just cogents is important? You don't think your godly origin is important? And then it says, second, for a norm to be considered a just cogents norm, its mandatory effect, baggage and effects, baggage and effects, baggage and effects, its mandatory effect must be universally accepted by the international community. In practice, this limits just cogents norms to prohibitions against egregious conduct, such as crimes against humanity, genocide, slavery, and human trafficking.

SPEAKER_02 2:25:36

Wow.

SPEAKER_01 2:25:39

This is huge. So let me read that line again. It says, um, finally everything elucidated via this authentic, mature diplomatic dispatch proves beyond a reasonable doubt when first in time dominion, i.e., rule of law, over a formally consecrated just cogents mystery, via faultless supreme being, based wholly on one's upon one's exclusive and timeless little Genesis, i.e., the origin or coming into being of something. Just cogin's mystery via faultless supreme being. Okay, so I'm gonna go to uh etymology online, and I'm gonna go to um father.

SPEAKER_04 2:26:29

I'll just go to father.

SPEAKER_01 2:26:33

Because I use the word supreme being, faultless supreme being. So I'm gonna go to father because I already know it's there. So father at etymology says um he who begets a child, nearest male ancestor, also any lineal male ancestor, and then right after that to my colon, the the supreme being. So a father's the and it's capital S, capital B, Supreme Being. That's the father is the supreme being. But if I go down about three paragraphs, it says, as a title of various church dignitaries from 1300, circa 1300, the meaning, this is father, creator, inventor, author, is from mid-14th century. That here it is, anything that gives rise to something else. Does the zygote give rise to the embryo fetus baby? Yeah. So the zygote, the monozygotic maritime monarchy, that single cell born in the water, gives rise to the embryo fetus baby.

SPEAKER_05 2:27:49

Yeah.

SPEAKER_01 2:27:49

So the zygote is the father, and that father, then, that that material that's left behind after baby comes out, the father's left behind, Linda. On the ground of the accretion, mom's part of the placenta. So that father is on the ground. Heavenly father is on that ground, the supreme being is on that ground. So the fetal maternal placenta, Linda, evidences the father on that island, even though it's considered an infant in biology. Got it?

unknown 2:28:28

Yeah.

SPEAKER_01 2:28:29

And they mark it. It's a they memorialize it. It's a memorial. The birth record is a memorial. That holy ground, where you arrived. It's not a big deal when you understand it. It's not even a threat.

SPEAKER_04 2:28:47

You just have to know it and then not be angry about it because it's just part of nature.

SPEAKER_01 2:28:56

I know it's really hard to not be angry, but okay. Okay, so I'm gonna get out of here.

SPEAKER_04 2:29:03

I'm gonna get out of Just Cogents.

SPEAKER_01 2:29:08

And it says formally consecrated Just Cogents ministry via faultless supreme being based wholly upon one's exclusive and timeless little g Genesis. I think we need to go to Genesis real quick because I said little g Genesis.

SPEAKER_04 2:29:32

Little G. So what's interesting is they use this loop tail g.

SPEAKER_01 2:29:36

There's a circle with a nice curve down, and then this flat circle, which to me is the baby umbilical and extraembryonic material. When you look at the it's called the loop tail g, when you look at the loop tail g lowercase genesis, it says the origin or coming into being of something. That's biology. And they're using the loop tail g, which looks just like the baby umbilical and extraembryonic material, Linda, with any imagination at all. And then, but then you go down to capital G Genesis and it says the mainly narrative first book of canonical Jewish and Christian scripture. So Capital G Genesis is a narrative, it's a story, it's art. Lowercase loop tail G Genesis is actually the biology. So it says little G Genesis, i.e., the origin or coming into being of something. Any objection, oh you know what? I found something the other day. Because we've been I'm really harping upon this this this island, this this place where Heavenly Father is on the ground. Where I mean I we I call it holy ground. The birth record is holy ground, Linda. Um, I found some a legal term that it's the the combination of heaven and earth or or my first estate biology on mom's second estate um ground or land. And the fetal maternal placenta is evidencing the first estate on the second estate. There's a word, there's a legal term that is I just saw it, I just learned it the other day. Inextricably intertwined. The fetal maternal placenta is evidencing an inextricably intertwined organ. You cannot separate my biology from mom's biology. It it is inextricably intertwined. And there is a document or lots of documents, but you have to look up inextricably intertwined as a legal term, and it'll blow your mind.

SPEAKER_04 2:31:58

Because what they're saying is that let me see if I can find the one thing here. In fact, I'll I'm just gonna go to the easiest definition I have I found.

SPEAKER_01 2:32:11

Inextricably inextricably intertwined Let me see if I can find this. There's a really simple definition. And I'm if you're thinking of the fetal maternal placenta, it's it is mind-boggling what they're what they're able to do with this.

SPEAKER_04 2:32:46

Let's see. Oh, that's not it.

SPEAKER_01 2:32:58

Oh, I might have it you know what, I might have it at uh at at the telegram group. Let me see if I find it there.

SPEAKER_04 2:33:06

Oh, I do. I do actually. Inextricably intertwined.

SPEAKER_02 2:33:33

Seven forty AM on April twenty-sixth.

SPEAKER_04 2:33:38

April twenty-sixth. There it is.

SPEAKER_01 2:33:46

Um, I said it it it right there, the fetomaternal placenta is inextricably intertwined, and the definition that I found that really makes sense here it says flames. Are inextricably intertwined only when deciding one necessarily decides the other. So you got to look at this. You got my kingdom, my 46 chromosomes, on a piece of ground with mom's 46 chromosomes. If they were to decide in favor of mom or whoever's managing that that island territory, then I lose. If because I'm attached to it. If I win, if my 46 chromosome claim wins, then I get the I get the island. You see, so so because they're inextricably intertwined, if you decide anything on one, you're also deciding on the other. And it's so huge, the ramifications of this is so huge that which is what equity is about. When you go all the way back to fertilization and and you evidence the first in time, there it's so obvious that the that the effect of my existence, my my existence being the cause and the nucleus, um, and the effect of that existence becomes the accretion. So now when you understand the biology, um, even though the fetal maternal placenta is inextricably intertwined, you'll realize that I have a right of way over mom's biology. And if an ownership position is forced, the only one that has any right to that biology is me.

unknown 2:35:42

Yeah.

SPEAKER_01 2:35:43

Nobody else has a right to it. I'm the only one that ever crossed over it, I'm the only one that ever occupied it. I'm the only one. It didn't exist before me because mom created it for me, and it doesn't exist after me because she expels it with my biology in the form of afterbirth. So the only one that has any right to it by any stretch of the imagination is me. But it is inextricably intertwined because you can't separate the two biologies. It's it is literally a tertium quid that cannot be separated. But the problem is nobody knows it exists. Right. So there's all kinds of rulings happening, and if if somebody defeats me in a court action, or if I don't understand the and my my my waterborne nature, I I'd be giving up the kingdom. I'd be giving up the monarchy, I'd be giving up the sovereignty.

SPEAKER_06 2:36:42

Right.

SPEAKER_01 2:36:45

If I'm a man on the land, I've let go of my waterborne kingdom. If I'm in the water, if I'm if I'm still considered in the water, then I don't have the law of the land or the constitution or bill of rights that apply to me. But when I know that I'm all present and accounted for from fertilization to last breath, then my ship has come in, so to speak, and here I am sitting in the basement of my house on the land. I've arrived. Even though I'm waterborne. And that's why, again, when you when I the the greatest movie ever that evidences these two positions, Linda, is Trading Places. The very last scene of Trading Places is where a boat with Dan Aykroyd is standing there waving to uh a guy uh uh uh on the on an island, and the boat is moored. You can see the mooring line going underneath, so it's attached to the island, but Aykroyd's wearing a sweater vest, a red, white, and blue sweater vest, which is you gotta think of it as the United States, red, white, and blue, and the native um kidding on on the island, the native on the island, uh, which is Freddie uh Murphy. I mean I'm is it Freddie Murphy?

SPEAKER_02 2:38:15

Eddie Murphy.

SPEAKER_01 2:38:16

Eddie Murphy, I'm sorry. Eddie Murphy um on the island wearing you know island colors, they're connected.

SPEAKER_04 2:38:28

Yeah. So you got you got the boat, the mooring line, and the island.

SPEAKER_01 2:38:34

You have my vessel that I came in from the heavens, which is my arc or my biology, my 46 chromosomes, the umbilical cord is the mooring line, and the island territory is the accretion. And that I mean that's the greatest movie ever that shows these two positions separate until they get together. At the end, when they get together, when they're in agreement, when they're working together, when they're in harmony, everything works out. Um, so let me keep going. Again, inextricably intertwined.

SPEAKER_04 2:39:17

The the phetomaternal placenta. What happens if somebody were to take that placenta, Linda, through eminent domain?

SPEAKER_01 2:39:28

What if somebody claimed that? What if somebody claimed it through eminent domain? I'm gonna go to eminent domain real quick at Black Flaw.

SPEAKER_04 2:39:38

Just for the hell of it. Eminent domain. There it is.

SPEAKER_01 2:39:46

Page 470. The power to take private property for public use by the state, municipalities, and private persons or corporations authorized to exercise functions of public character. In the United States, the power of eminent domain is founded in the in both the federal Fifth Amendment and state constitutions. However, the Constitution limits this power to taking for a public purpose and prohibits the exercise of the power of eminent domain without just compensation to the owners of the property which is taken. The process of exercising the power of eminent domain is commonly referred to as condemn condemnation or expropriation. They condemn it, they condemn your house, they condemn that property. The right of eminent domain is the right of the state through its regular organization to reassert either temporary or permanently its dominion over any portion of the soil of the state on account of public exigency and for public good. Thus, in time of war or insurrection, the proper authorities may possess and hold any part of the territory of the state for the common safety, and in time of peace, the legislature may authorize the appropriation of the same to public purposes, such as the opening of roads, construction or defenses, or providing channels for trade or travel. Eminent domain is the highest and most exact idea of property remaining in the government or in the aggregate body of people in their sovereign capacity. It gives a right to resume the possession of property in a manner directed by the Constitution and laws of the state whenever the public interest requires it. I'm going to go down to partial taking, P-A-R-T-I-A-L. The taking of part of an owner's property under the laws of eminent domain, compensation must be based on damages or benefits to the remaining property as well as the part taken. So again, this is where I think when you go to uh the Libra Code, Article 38, Article 38, Libra Code, when you understand that that record is evidence of probably the taking through eminent domain, again it's not a big deal if you understand equity, but Article 38, oops.

SPEAKER_04 2:42:48

Article thirty-eight, Lieber. There it is.

SPEAKER_01 2:43:00

Um it starts to make sense. Again, there's no enemy in this thing if you really understand what's going on. You just have to realize that it's all biology. So Article 38 says private property, unless forfeited by crimes or offenses of the owner, can be seized only by way of military necessity for the support or other benefit of the Army or of the United States. It says if the owner has not fled, which means standing your ground, the commanding officer will cause receipts to be given, which may serve the spoliated owner to obtain indemnity. And indemnity would be basically immunity. Immunity. So that would be equity. Yeah. But you have to stand your ground or you have to know what that island territory is, and most people will never know what it is.

SPEAKER_02 2:43:53

Um there I better keep it. They forfeited it by uh offenses by the owner.

SPEAKER_01 2:44:05

Well, I mean, yeah, well, I mean, that anything, even if you're abandoning it, if you if you abandon the property through you just don't know, out of sight, out of mind. It doesn't matter what it is. The reality is, is I'm here right now. But the original first estate, zygote, has exactly the same 46 chromosomes I have today. So the monarchy, the original monarchy, and me today, my belly button evidences that link through what was used to be attached, the umbilical cord. So the kingdom itself is baby, umbilical cord, and extraembryonic material. That's the first estate monarchy. The extraembryonic material then is the roots of the roots or my heritage, but those roots went into the soil of mom's uterine wall. So the soil of mom's uterine wall, which is still the which is the accretion, still attached to part of the placenta. So now you have the roots, my my 46 chromosomes, in that soil, mom's 46 chromosomes. So had the delivery been completed, which is the fetus and its membranes by definition, my monarchy would have been intact. But somebody cut that off and placed it on deposit, whether it was taken through eminent domain or not. The point is that I'm still using it today. If I'm still breathing life into the monarchy, if I'm still breathing life into this vessel, if I'm still breathing life into it, it can't be condemned. If I'm still breathing life into it, Linda, it can't be taken as condemned property because I still have what you would call, or what most people would call, um the grace of God, the breath.

SPEAKER_04 2:45:50

I'm still breathing. It's not condemned. God is still in the house.

SPEAKER_01 2:45:58

How's that? God is in me, and if it's in me, it's also in the 46 chromosomes on that island by extension. And I also, because my mind recognizes the second estate island territory, it has this has a government. Mine. I'm self-governing over that territory, over that land. It all makes sense when you when you stick with the biology. The moment you start trying to make shit up, Linda, and I mean make it up. Everything that comes out of almost everybody else's mouth, they're just making it up because they don't know. All I know, this is the only thing I know. I know that I'm all present and accounted for. How's that? From fertilization of last breath. All right, let me keep reading here.

SPEAKER_02 2:46:50

That's all I know.

SPEAKER_01 2:46:52

Any objection to this first hand account must be made in writing through the hand of another living man and received by the author within 60 days publication of Sound Mind, a Pacific Transcription, or everything expressed within this copy copyrighted tome stands for all men everywhere as the unrebutted truth of the matter from fertilization to last breath in regards to the species specific heritage of all mankind.

SPEAKER_04 2:47:20

I'm gonna s I'm gonna see if I can find heritage of all mankind. Well heritage of all common heritage of humanity. Common heritage of humanity. Um this is huge.

SPEAKER_01 2:47:56

Let me see if I can find okay, so I'm gonna just go to the simplest one common heritage of humanity at Wikipedia. See what it says. This is so common heritage of humanity. The common heritage of humanity represents all the skills and achievements of the human race, which are held to be shared by all. That's equity, Linda. But it's but it's by the human race. So if you're part of the human race which begins at fertilization, then you have equity. What happens when you cut yourself off from the human race?

SPEAKER_02 2:48:34

Then you don't have anything, any right.

SPEAKER_01 2:48:36

You don't have equity, you certainly don't have equity. It says as a principle of international law, look at that, it's even international law. It holds that the defined territory, territorial areas and elements of humanity's common heritage, cultural and natural, should be held in trust for future generations. That's this is equity, and be protected from exploitation by individual nation states or corporations. Some possible examples include global communication between individuals over the internet and geostationary orbit over the high seas. The high seas.

SPEAKER_04 2:49:14

There it is.

SPEAKER_01 2:49:19

The 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict. It says the first known use, there it is right here. Common heritage of mankind. The first known use of common heritage of mankind by a state representatives uh representative in the United Nations, constituting state practice, was the first United Nations Conference on the law of the sea. I'm sorry, Linda, where where does man originate? Where where do we originate?

SPEAKER_02 2:49:59

In the sea. In the waters.

SPEAKER_01 2:50:01

In the waters of mother, yes. The law, so the law of the sea by Prince Juan of Thailand uh in 1958. It says the role of mankind as a legal subject was mentioned in negotiations in the 1967 Outer Space Treaty, and mentions of mankind appear in across space treaties. Mankind as a subject, a subject in international law also appears in the preamble of the United Nations Charter, the preamble of the North Atlantic Treaty, and the Treaty of Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.

SPEAKER_04 2:50:35

But again, I'm gonna go to the Law of the Sea Conference, and I'm gonna just see if I can find their I don't really have to.

SPEAKER_01 2:50:54

I got the the species-specific heritage of all mankind, Linda, from the Law of the Sea. Now, I'm gonna do something here. Territorial sea. I'm I'm at the the convention, the United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea, and I'm just going to the word territorial sea. What's interesting about territorial sea, it says vessels, this is territorial sea, vessels were given the right of innocent passage through any territorial sea with strategic straights allowing the passage of military craft as transit passage, in that naval vessels are allowed to maintain postures that would be illegal in a territorial sea. Innocent passage is the key here.

SPEAKER_04 2:51:43

When I'm in the womb, Linda, in the waters of mother, everything I'm doing is extraterritorial. Nothing in the womb is subjected to man's ideas.

SPEAKER_01 2:51:59

I'm going to innocent passage. I'm clicking on innocent passage. Innocent passage at Wikipedia says is a concept in the law of the sea that allows for vessels to pass through the territorial sea and certain grandfathered international waters. Grandfathered international, I'm sorry, internal waters of another state innocent passage is huge. And finally, I think what I sh what I really need to do is I need to go to the word innocent. This is really weird to me.

SPEAKER_04 2:52:36

I just saw this yesterday. Innocent D E F at Webster's. This is so nutty. I mean Webster's innocent. Now remember the moment of creation, Linda. You're innocent of everything. So innocence begins at fertilization. But what but why don't you ever hear the word innocent in a courtroom? Because it's after the cut. Right.

SPEAKER_01 2:53:15

So the legal fiction only gives there's only two choices for the legal fiction. So I call them the fool's choice, but the legal fiction only allows for innoc or uh guilty or not guilty. The legal fiction is guilty, not guilty, whereas your true godly origin is innocent. Fertilization equals innocence. Um conception or legal fiction equals guilty or not guilty. So what's really weird about the word innocent, the definition of innocent.

SPEAKER_04 2:53:46

Look what it says here. One A. Read that. Free from legal guilt or false. Also lawful. It's a lawful. Lawful is innocent. But look what one A says. Free from legal guilt or false. It doesn't say free from guilt or false. It says free from legal guilt or false.

SPEAKER_01 2:54:34

It doesn't say free from guilt or false. Innocence doesn't say free from guilt or free from fault.

SPEAKER_04 2:54:43

It says free from legal guilt or fault. Also lawful. So they've just defined that legal guilt or legal fault. Free from legal guilt or free from legal fault. Can you see what's going on here?

SPEAKER_01 2:55:19

If it once you accept the legal fiction in place of reality or in place of fertilization, in place of the first estate or got your godly origin, the moment you accept the birth certificated legal fiction in place of reality, you're no longer innocent.

SPEAKER_02 2:55:42

Um you're not guilty. And your lawful says being in harmony with the law. And that's the law. God's law.

SPEAKER_04 2:55:57

Right, the Theo.

SPEAKER_01 2:56:00

God's law. Being in harmony with the law.

SPEAKER_04 2:56:05

When does the law begin? When does natural law begin? When does anything begin for a man? At fertilization. At fertilization. This is again understanding reality.

SPEAKER_01 2:56:25

And remember, truth has no enemy. Standing in the light of truth has no enemy. There is no opposition to truth. People don't understand that, well, Kurt, what about a lie? What about what if somebody lies to you? That's not truth. Yes, yes, it is. What people don't understand is that a lie is nothing more than an omission of the whole. You're leaving something out. To mislead is e it is also an omission to mislead. A birth date is an omission. You're not including a piece of the duration of one's life. I don't care whether it's at the front end or the back end. It's an omission.

SPEAKER_04 2:57:12

Something's missing. A lie by omission. So if somebody lies to you, it's still within the truth. They just didn't tell you the whole story. If they would have told you the whole story, it would have been the truth.

SPEAKER_01 2:57:35

But if they don't tell you the whole story, if they don't tell you everything, if they're concealing something, the lie by omission. All lies are by omission because they're they're leaving a detail out. They're leaving some moment out. They're leaving something out, which means it's not W-H O L E. It's not whole.

SPEAKER_04 2:57:57

And any terms.

SPEAKER_02 2:58:00

Yeah, it's subject to the um.

SPEAKER_03 2:58:04

If it's not whole, then it's it's subject to whatever fiction it's in, if it's not.

SPEAKER_01 2:58:12

It requires a remedy. It requires a prosthetic. When you clamp and cut the cord off of me, which I would just I would call it an amputation, if you remove an organ from me, now I'm missing something. That's an omission. If you give me a prosthetic or a representation of that thing you cut off of me, then you control the representation. But the reality is, is I already had it. It was mine before the mayhem. It was already mine before you cut it off.

SPEAKER_04 2:58:54

It's weird when you think about it because truth is so simple.

SPEAKER_01 2:59:00

And in fact, again, the back of this book, the very last line says, every man is independent of all laws except those prescribed by nature. When you're in alignment with nature, when you're in alignment with truth, everything works. When you don't lie to somebody, they have an opportunity to respond based upon the truth. But if you lie to somebody and they respond based upon your lie, chances are their response is wrong. They can't even respond according to the truth because you misled them. Is a birth certificated character does it mislead people?

SPEAKER_04 2:59:47

Yes. Of course it does. There's so much the the truth is so beautiful.

SPEAKER_01 2:59:57

And the problem is is it's really easy when you're willing to look.

SPEAKER_04 3:00:02

Or w by the way, let's just finish up with this idea too, is that you already have everything all the time. I mean we all do. You have the gifts you were given.

SPEAKER_01 3:00:28

What you do with them is up to you. And and that's how it works. You know? We choose our paths, but truth doesn't you don't get to choose truth. The beautiful thing about truth is you can only accept it. You don't choose truth. It already is. So all you can do is accept it.

SPEAKER_04 3:00:55

You can't find it because it's true. You can't change it because it's true. You can only work within it.

SPEAKER_01 3:01:09

Um let me see if I can I'm gonna do I'm gonna make one last I may have brought this up before, but let me do one thing here. Because I kinda don't want people to think I'm always railing off against anything when I'm not, because some of my favorite books some of my favorite books are you know religious in their nature. Um this book right here is so amazing to me. It's called, and I may have mentioned it, I know I have to you before, but um, The Great Deception, how one lie uh reshaped modern Christianity. You know, this to me, when I when I understood the message of this book, it made me realize what we're doing is totally in alignment with what what with what Christianity um should have been. But I'm gonna read out of this something. Uh he talks about design in this book. Um, and most people would call it intelligent design or design itself. Everything works the way God created it. So he's saying that things are designed to work a certain way in this book. So design was the key that he's he's focused on in this book, and he's saying if everything works in accordance with its design, then everything works perfectly. Well, that goes with us too. Um here's here's the line. I'm just gonna read this because it's so cool. It says, this is from page 33, design law describes how things are meant to function and does not require enforcement because it operates automatically. Gravity does not punish those who ignore it, it simply functions as it was designed. When its principles are violated, injury follows naturally. The consequence is not imposed, it is inherent. The Bible presents God's law in the same way. Life flourishes when it is aligned with how reality was created. When it is not, damage follows. This damage is not the result of God's anger, but the result of breaking connection with what sustains life. Seen through this lens, sin is not dangerous because God is offended. It is dangerous because it disconnects life from its source. Design law does not require punishment because it is woven into creation itself. A plant der deprived of water withers, a body deprived of rest breaks down. These outcomes are not penalties imposed by an authority, they are natural, they are the natural result of ignoring how life works. That's the same with us. When you understand that your origin is fertilization and that your body and everything else is all present and accounted for from fertilization of last breath, then all of the inherent rights of man belong to you.

SPEAKER_04 3:04:50

But when you go against creation, when you go against the design, things happen, things go wrong.

SPEAKER_01 3:05:01

And that's what Cruden v. Neil is. That's man's design. Nature is man's design. When we lie to each other, bad things happen. When we steal from each other, bad things happen. When we cheat on each other, bad things happen because it's not in our nature to do those things. It's our nature to get along, it's our nature to not be at war.

SPEAKER_04 3:05:34

By design.

SPEAKER_01 3:05:58

But when you start making claims that aren't true, you're not getting punished, you're feeling the results of bad choices. My I'll end I'll end with this idea. It's truth or consequences.

SPEAKER_04 3:06:16

Yep.

SPEAKER_01 3:06:18

You remember that show?

SPEAKER_04 3:06:20

I do.

SPEAKER_01 3:06:22

Truth or consequences. If you tell the truth, everything flows smoothly. If you don't stay in alignment with truth or reality, there are consequences. If you're not being punished, it just happens.

SPEAKER_04 3:06:38

Anyway, that's it.

SPEAKER_01 3:06:42

That's that's again inextricably intertwined. When they rule on the one, the other is affected. That's simple.

SPEAKER_04 3:06:56

If they rule in favor of the island, you're affected. If they rule in favor of you, you have equity. That's simple. We good? Yeah.

SPEAKER_01 3:07:18

I don't really know where these voices have been coming from on this call. I'm gonna see if I can hear them um on the recording. But they've really been they've they've been really pronounced on this call. And it's like somebody is you know in the background. So it's kind of bothering me.

SPEAKER_02 3:07:36

Yeah. Yeah, I never heard them.

SPEAKER_01 3:07:39

Yeah, it's only on this side, I think. I thought at first it was uh kind of a reverb, or I could hear myself talk, but they're not saying the same things as me. So anyway, I'll uh get this, I'll get this posted. But yeah, this is this is the end of a remastered life. Um eleven eleven paragraphs is a lot. But uh we get to talk about something else. Yeah. All right, lady, love you. I'm gonna I'm gonna end the thing and and and post it.

SPEAKER_02 3:08:09

Okay. Sounds great.

SPEAKER_01 3:08:11

All right, talk to you. Yep.

SPEAKER_02 3:08:13

Talk to you. Bye. Wow.