Most providers are focusing on the wrong variables when it comes to energy-based treatments. James Bartholomeusz, Chief Innovation Officer at Sofwave, joins Kathy to break down how providers should evaluate and apply energy-based devices and why results vary so widely across practices.
The conversation focuses on how energy is actually delivered, showing why total energy and distribution matter more than per-pulse intensity or full-face coverage.
He explains how fractional injury drives more predictable outcomes, why targeted treatment zones outperform blanket approaches, and how device simplicity often reflects a stronger underlying biological mechanism.
The discussion also covers patient comfort without numbing, the role of perception in pain, and how GLP-1 use and hormone-related changes are shifting treatment planning toward earlier, more proactive intervention.
The result is a practical framework for delivering more consistent outcomes, improving team adoption, and building scalable, system-based treatment strategies.
Talking Points:
Download the free resource here.
Get the key takeaways and treatment strategies from this episode, including total energy application, patient comfort, and device optimization.
Episode Sponsors:
Ad Links
MINT Online E-courses
Links from this episode
Sofwave