4 Legal English

The McDonald’s Hot Coffee Lawsuit: What Really Happened?

Timothy Barrett Episode 89

Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.

0:00 | 21:27

Send us Fan Mail

 On the docket today, we look at the real story behind the McDonald’s hot coffee lawsuit — one of the most misunderstood cases in American legal history. This episode explains what actually happened in Liebeck v. McDonald’s Restaurants, including the serious injuries, the temperature of the coffee, the evidence presented at trial, and the jury’s decision. You will also learn key Legal English terms connected to negligence, product liability, comparative negligence, compensatory damages, punitive damages, settlement, and tort reform. 

Read the full Episode Brief:
Get the transcript, Legal English Lexicon, key vocabulary, and further explanation for this episode here.  

Free Legal English PDF:
Download 10 Common Legal English Mistakes — and How to Avoid Them here.

Learn more about 4 Legal English:
Visit 4LegalEnglish.com to find more podcast episodes, Legal English lessons, free resources, and courses for international lawyers and law students.   

For more about the podcast, go here

Have a question or topic suggestion? Send a text or voicemail through the link at the top of the show notes. I may answer it in a future episode.

Join the global 4 Legal English conversation.
The podcast now has listeners in 186 countries — and I would love to hear from you. Click Send Fan Mail at the top of the show notes to send a quick text message or voicemail. Tell me your first name, country, and question about Legal English, legal communication, or the U.S. legal system. Your question may be featured in a future episode. 

Support the show