Episode 133 - Never Trust the Government

If the Government tells you something about health, diet, medication, etc., you should immediately turn the TV off. Search reliable sources for the real information. Government does not serve you, it serves its own purposes, and the NIH is an unconstitutional entity, benefiting bureaucrats and drug companies.

Transcript

SPEAKER_00 0:12

Welcome to Careful Consideration of Our Common Concerns. I'm Dr. Ted Noel. And the seminar is back in session. I know it's been a while. I get busy doing other things, and because I don't make a living at this, sometimes it takes a while. Hopefully, it's been worth the wait. Our subject today is can you trust the government? Then I'm not asking you to trust the news media. We know that the news media is not trustworthy. The latest example being the memorandum of understanding on Iran, which simply says, you're going to do a couple of things while we discuss a bunch of others on these basic principles. And in order for you to understand that we are serious about it, we're going to give you stuff while you give us stuff, and we'll just keep going. You had all sorts of newsies arguing that we had given away the store or that the Iranians had folded. It was all based on unnamed sources or confidential stuff. And anytime you hear that kind of nonsense, remember that it's nonsense. The person passing it on is probably dealing with something they've heard second or third hand and they don't understand it, and they just want to have an in into the media. And this is how all sorts of lies get out into the media. So when anything in the media, and I don't care what the subject is, comes out, sources tell us that. Turn it off. It's not true because the sources are wrong. They simply don't know. In any case, the real subject today is make America healthy again. And let's go back to a bit of history. Ah, yes, as Georgia Santayana said, people who don't know history are doomed to repeat it. And this is where we are. Let's go back in the early 1980s to something called grid, gay related immune deficiency. You don't remember that name? Oh, that's because that was a terrible politically incorrect name. And the actual name now is uh dermal please, HIV slash AIDS. AIDS is the syndrome where you get all sorts of stuff like Kaposi sarcoma, and HIV says that you've been infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. But grid was an accurate description because it predominantly involved gaze. Now it was a blood-borne disease, and there were a handful of patients, including one of mine, who got it from a blood transfusion. It happens. We've learned how to test for it, and it's pretty darn rare now, but it is still a gay-related disease. The anal intercourse that's done in gay sex is clearly the primary means by which it is transmitted. And they thought, oh my god, it's going to be an epidemic. Heaven help us, the sky is falling. And so everybody was about getting scared to death about it. The idea was it's going to take over the world, everybody's going to die, and you need the government to save you. The moment you hear that, gather the women and children, get out your guns, bad stuff is coming. Maybe not quite that bad, but the point is if the government tells you that we got bad stuff coming on the health arena, it's almost certainly not going to happen. Just discount it, it's not going to happen. Let's look at a couple other cases. You may remember something called Ebola. Now, Ebola is something in a family of what are known as hemorrhagic fevers. And the hemorrhagic fevers are endemic to Central Africa. The reservoir is a monkey of one sort or another. And because of extreme poverty, the people there, when they catch a monkey, they eat it. And if the monkey's infected with Ebola, they get Ebola. It's a nasty disease in humans. In the monkeys, it does not much. And so everybody goes, Oh my god, we're going to have a worldwide epidemic. No, it's not happening. And the reason is very simple. Viruses that kill people don't spread very far. Now, in Central Africa, in the latest version of Ebola, we've had maybe a thousand cases or a thousand deaths. A few more cases, some people have recovered. But the basic idea is that the easiest way to prevent Ebola is to not have physical contact with the people with Ebola. But you have social issues in Central Africa where these people gather the dead and they give them kisses and so on. And guess what? That's a good way to get Ebola. And that's how Ebola keeps spreading in that local area of the Congo. Oh, yes. Now, the easiest way to fix all of this would be to get rid of all of the socialist governments, let you know, people start to develop personal wealth. They wouldn't need to eat monkeys. And Ebola would disappear. But Ebola actually brings us to our next villain. I am science Anthony Vauci. Oh, yes, that guy. Because when we had a couple of Americans who had gone over to help treat the people with Ebola who contracted it themselves, they brought them back. And these people were kept in isolation and treated. And they were given a drug called Remdesivir. This was Anthony Fauci's favorite drug. He had developed it. He owned some patent rights. And if it was used, he made money. Money, money, money, money, money. And this is the problem. Because one, it didn't work any in Ebola. The two people who came back with Ebola and were treated survived because of extremely good supportive care. Remdesivir did nothing, but he had this marvelous drug that had to have a place to get used. So, oh, where did that get used? You remember this little thing called COVID-19? Yes, which actually probably existed long before 2019, which was developed. Oh, wait a minute, who paid for that? Hmm, let me think. Oh, yes. Anthony Fauci paid for the development of COVID-19. He laundered the money through Ralph Berrick over to Wuhan. And the work was actually done out of sight in Wuhan, which didn't have very good safety protocols. And however, it happened, it got loose. And that's kind of the end of the story. Except that the government, in order for the government to have power, never forget this. The government did it in order for it to have power, declared it this horrible epidemic. Now we now know what some of the naysayers, like Peter McCulloch and others, have said from the beginning that this was no worse than seasonal flu. And we all called it Wuhan flu. Everybody who tested positive got declared to have COVID. And what did the government do? It said, you're going to use this PCR test in 40 cycles. Well, the people who developed PCR said no. 25 is the maximum, and it's not designed to diagnose a disease. Remember, it's a lab test. And one of the things they teach you early in medical school is that you don't diagnose a disease based on lab tests. Lab tests plus symptoms and signs. Symptoms are what they tell you. Signs are what the doctor observes. Those are what diagnose a disease. So for example, when I look at Parkinson's disease, there are no lab tests. None whatever. There are some provocative tests, and a combination of those provocative tests tells the doctor, I think that this is Parkinson's, and then they'll try the Parkinson drugs. And if they you get better on those, then you have a diagnosis. Okay. You don't have the flu if you test positive for the flu and you're not sick. Pure and simple. You have to have both the lab and the signs and symptoms. Okay. I remember when my daughter got married. My group and my hospital demanded that I get the flu vaccine. I got it, and I got mightily sick. I got the flu from the vaccine. And so I was very sick at her wedding. But they told me I had to come into the hospital and spread the flu, or I couldn't go to her wedding. End of story. But here we have the bureaucracy, the authority. And COVID-19 was diagnosed by lab test only. So when a motorcyclist was killed when he ran into a tree, they swabbed him and oh, he had COVID-19. How? Well, after 40 cycles, the PCR test showed COVID-19. Therefore, he died of COVID-19. You see the garbage. They lied to us completely. They claimed a million people died from it. No, they didn't. And as a matter of fact, the government killed people by refusing to allow people to have ivermectin and zinc, because ivermectin and zinc together kept everybody out of the hospital. But they wouldn't let you have ivermectin. A doctor who prescribed ivermectin was likely to lose his license. You get the picture. So many billions of dollars got dumped into the vaccines, which didn't work. In fact, the vaccines kill people. Oh, yes. Check with Karen Kingston. Check with Steve Kirsch on Substack. Those people have very, very good data. Peter McCullough, same thing. Those people have very good data showing that the vaccine kills people. It causes great clotting. It causes turbo cancers. And it causes myocarditis at about 40 times the rate of normal myocarditis. In other words, the vaccine is deadly. I still don't understand why it's on the market, much less approved. It should be gone because it's horrible. Meanwhile, what let's go back to I am science. Fauci. What did he do? He didn't let you have ivermectin. But once you got in the hospital, you got, oh yes, what was that drug? Hmm. Oh yes, remdesivir. The one that didn't work for Ebola. Maybe it'll work for COVID. No, it didn't work for COVID either, but it killed people. It gave them kidney failure. It gave them liver failure. It killed people. But what happened? Anthony Fauci made money and the government had power. You see how much you should trust the government? Now let's go on. We finally get through COVID-19, and by the way, lockdowns did not work. We now know that in New York City, where they locked people down, the incidence of COVID was higher in the lockdown people than it was in the people out on the street. And by the way, was there ever a case transmitted outdoors? Not been a single case documented to have been transmitted outdoors. Same thing for flu. All of the airborne diseases, and flu and COVID-19 are just the two obvious ones, are transmitted in closed spaces with recirculated air. The Sichuan restaurant data showed that beyond any shadow of a doubt. The Skagit Valley Corral data showed it again. It's an airborne problem. And you beat it with fresh air and sunlight, because sunlight includes ultraviolet, which kills viruses. Oh, yeah, I bet the government didn't tell you that either. At any rate, let us carry on. We've talked about COVID. When COVID faded away because of Mueller's ratchet, that's a new one for you. Muller's ratchet is a mathematical description, basically, of the idea that a virus survives by being able to infect the largest number of hosts. Ebola kills its hosts, so it doesn't spread very far. The flu infects millions of people because it doesn't kill people. Why? If it killed its hosts, they couldn't spread it. And all viruses mutate. They do it constantly. It'll mutate into a less lethal form. And that form of the virus will infect more people. So the news spread on by the government, oh Fauci, yes, uh, will tell you, oh my god, it's highly infectious. They want you to think that means it's deadly. The answer is no. Something that's highly infectious is very much not deadly. It has mutated to a form where it doesn't kill people. It's mutated to a form where it's less serious. And yeah, once in a while somebody will die. Like once in a while, a measles patient will die, but not very often. And let's go take a look here. Let's go on. The next one was monkeypox. Oh my god, there's going to be another epidemic. This was discovered in 1958 in lab animals. The outbreak was in 2022 and 23. It is another sexually transmitted disease, primarily among the gays. You ever begin to wonder how gays survive with all the diseases that land on them only? In any case, because it was transmitted just like HIV, most of the rest of us were never going to get near it. And it faded from our attention. Let's just kind of go on and look at a couple of things. The government, when it tells us things about health, is wrong. Back in the 1950s, there was a big deal about heart disease was caused by too much saturated fat. And Ansel Keys browbeat people in various journals to publish that. And he got the McGovern uh commission in the Senate to publish what eventually became known as the Food Pyramid, which says you need lots of carbs and very little fat. We now know that that is absolutely wrong. There are no diseases that are caused by saturated fats. There are lots of diseases caused by unsaturated fats, particularly the polyunsaturated that they told you was so good for you. If you go back into a restaurant with a grill, look up. There's a thing above the grill called a grease trap. If they are using vegetable oils to cook, which have lots of polyunsaturated fats, that grease trap will be ugly, dirty, awful, grungy. You don't want to get near it horrible. Okay? Because what happens is chemically, polyunsaturated fats rust. It's the easiest way to put it. They change chemically into that intractable tar that's up there. It's horrible stuff, and you just don't want to get near it. If they cook with tallow, olive oil, olive oil is a vegetable oil, but it is a monounsaturate, has a single oxygen in it. If you look at, you know, where they be cook with tallow, with lard, whatnot, look up at the grease strap, it's pretty clean. Example from my house. I used to use the popcorn oil, which was canola. Now, canola is rancid rapeseed oil, it's polyunsaturated. My popcorn maker got grungy beyond belief. I'd go two or three batches of popcorn and I would spend an hour cleaning the bloody thing out. Now I cook with avocado oil and butter. And it stays clean. They want to tell you that you're dying from high cholesterol. Sorry, that's a problem. The number of diseases caused by high cholesterol is zero. There are low cholesterol, it is deadly. But you look at various studies, they claim that certain things are cardioprotective, like statins. But what you have, their surgosphere two study, is an observational study with unmatched groups. First, it's observational. You can't get a good scientific outcome from an observational study. What you get is a suggestion of something that you can study and then prove the case where you have matched groups. But this had very badly matched groups. So it doesn't even suggest anything other than that the researchers wanted to find something and it was designed to help them find it. That's bad science. And when you sit here and look at GAMA, Journal of the American Medical Association, the American Medical Association does not represent American medicine. Fewer than 10% of all U.S. doctors are members of the AMA. We have just as many doctors in the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, which stands up for patient and physician choice. JAMA and the New England Journal, the Archival Methods, when you look at uh Lancet out of England, we now know, for example, there is a war, a literal war on good studies, because it shows that large data sets prove COVID-19 vaccines kill people. And that brings us to our final step. Who should you believe? When I was in medical school, it was dogma that vaccines saved lives. But if you take a look at infectious diseases, which have all gone down over the years, and you look at the number of cases each year, and you will see a high level, sometime back, maybe 1920s, even, that slides down and down and down and eventually levels out into what we call in mathematics an asymptotic approach to zero. And basically what it says is they were declining. Whatever caused them to decline is still going on. And if you then say, well, we we established a vaccine for smallpox, for polio, for measles, for whatever, then you look at it and you go, okay, when did you do it? You look at the curve. If the vaccine worked, and this is your key point, your key takeaway, if a vaccine actually works, when you see it introduced, the number of cases from that disease should immediately drop way down. In other words, the curve was nice and smooth on the way down. It should have a step function down. It should fall off the cliff. I don't care which disease you look at, you won't find that curve anywhere. Measles, mumps, rubella, polio, smallpox, none of them show that curve. Why? Because the vaccines don't work and all the stories we've been told about them are lies. You heard me right. Go to look discovering illusions.com and look at their work. They've gone through the history. Read their book, read the book Turtles All the Way Down about Testing. Not a single vaccine has been tested properly. That's right, not one. But the government told us it was safe. And yet we now know that SIDS sudden infant death syndrome is universally within one week of vaccination of children, young children. And Japan, which outlawed vaccination before age two, has a near zero incidence of SIDS. You heard me right. Our government health function is a liar. It serves to make money for big pharma. And we should get rid of it for two reasons. One, it's a liar. It is impossible to be reformed. $42 billion could be cut from the budget tomorrow. Eliminate the National Institutes of Health, they are worthless. Somebody else will want to buy them. They'll probably give us pennies on the dollar, but that's better than nothing. But when you sit and look at it and you look at the Constitution, there is nothing in the Constitution that allows the government to be in that business. And I think that's enough for today. When the government talks about health, turn off the TV. Until next time, the message is what matters. I'm Dr. Ted Noel.