The Last Gay Conservative
The Last Gay Conservative
Wacky Wednesday: Fannie Willis Meltdown, Reparations Debate, & Brain-Rot in Media!
The sunshine is bright, the takes are brighter, and Wacky Wednesday pulls no punches. We kick off our first video-driven edition by asking a simple question that threads through every segment: where did accountability go? From a prosecutor’s RICO overreach to a city’s promise of reparations without funding, and from viral narratives to conservative shock-jock theatrics, we track how incentives—not ideals—shape outcomes that citizens end up paying for.
First, we unpack the Fani Willis hearing: charges stretched to fit a target, costs that ballooned, and evasive answers when asked who approved invoices and why. Lawfare doesn’t just risk losing cases; it corrodes trust in equal justice under the law. Then we travel west to San Francisco, where the board set up a reparations framework with no dollars attached. Moral claims deserve serious policy: if the mission is mobility and wealth creation, blunt cash drops won’t beat targeted small-business grants, procurement pathways, and ownership ladders that compound over time.
We turn to Representative Jasmine Crockett’s past rental car dispute as a sharper test of character. Mistakes happen; the tell is whether leaders own their contracts and honor responsibility when things go sideways. In between, we break down the media economy’s worst impulses—suggestive framing, click-chasing, and performative outrage—then introduce a new segment skewering conservative media figures who platform hate instead of ideas. If the goal is to build a winning coalition, burning bridges to go viral is self-sabotage. Growth lives in respect, policy craftsmanship, and inviting in voters who are tired of chaos.
Want us to keep the cameras rolling? Subscribe, share this episode with a friend, and drop your thoughts in a text or voicemail at 866 LastGay. Your feedback drives the show—what should we cover next?
It's time. From Newport Beach, California, the sun is shining, the beaches are packed, and the waves are rolling in. All while the Las Gay Conservative prepares to share more truth with America. He's America's binary brother, the holiest homo, and the gayest conservative of all time, working to restore common sense conservative politics in the American household. Welcome to the Lasgay Conservative Podcast. Here's your host, Chad Law.
SPEAKER_01:Welcome to another episode of the Last Gay Conservative Podcast. I'm your host, Chad Law, America's binary brother, the holiest homo and the gayest conservative of all time, here to spread truth through the airwaves on the only rainbow that matters: the red, white, and blue rainbow. Well, welcome to Wacky Wednesday, folks. This is our first video version of Wacky Wednesday, and we have a lot of fun stuff for you today, folks. By the way, how do you all like the video show? Isn't this cool? Don't I look amazing? I see the numbers slowly ticking up on video, getting lower on audio platforms, but I really want to know what you think. And seriously, folks, I don't mind if you just want to listen. Watching Shrek's younger, thinner brother for an hour isn't for you. It's not for me either. I have YouTube Premium, which I love because I can listen in the background. But if you don't have that, which I highly recommend, then listen anywhere you want. Spotify, Apple, I don't care. But please let me know what you think. Don't forget you can call or text anytime at 866 LastGay. You can leave a voicemail or text us at 866 LastGay. However, if that's too much to remember, stop what you're doing right now. Look at the episode page on your phone or wherever you're listening. And right here in the description, it says text the show. Just hit that and let me have it, folks. This show runs on your feedback, requests, and just general genius. Not to mention, I love getting the pile on my desk every morning. It's my favorite part of the day. But wacky Wednesdays when we cover the wackiest stories, people and politics from the week. And I do this for two reasons. The first and foremost reason is the same reason I binge watch housewives and only hang out with people in public that are fatter, older, and uglier than myself. So I feel better. That's right out of my narcissistic playbook. But the other reason I love doing Wacky Wednesday is that we see what is wacky is just general everyday behavior on the left. I mean, the way these folks on the left struggle with reality is very entertaining to me and apparently you, because some of my highest-rated shows are actually Wacky Wednesdays from the audio. And for this week's Wacky Wednesdays gaily news, Fannie Wilson freaked out, channeled her inner early 2000s Nelly during her intense exchange with the Georgia State Senate this morning, oftentimes just shouting, wasn't me. Turns out America's DEI district attorney doesn't like to be questioned or being held accountable. And her outbursts are hysterical. Can't wait to share those with you. Reparations are back on the table as the San Francisco Board of Supervisors is taking more official steps to start writing checks. This is the epitome of a wacky Wednesday story, folks. And all I can say is this is another DNC buy-a-vote program for America's Most Desperate. This is a direct response to the tariff checks and huge tax refunds anticipated for the spring in order to secure DNC votes. Lastly, Jasmine Crockett is caught riding dirty with career criminals. Looks like she has a little history with hanging out with career criminals. We'll talk about that. Furthermore, another non-related news from jingle bells to abuse of vice presidents, the left's biggest lies of the week. And we are introducing a brand new segment to Wacky Wednesdays, the last gay syphilis recovery center. So many conservative broadcasters are clearly suffering from brain rot these days, and it seemed to happen very immediate and very quickly for many of them. And at the last gay conservative, we try to help people instead of hurting them. Think of me as the Mother Teresa and the Nick Fuenteses, the Tucker Carlsons, the Candace Owens, the Steve Bannons, the Milo Yanninopouloses, the Marjorie Taylor Greens, the Steve Crowders, and the Megan Kellys of the world as the sick, poor, starving people on the streets of Calcutta. Clearly, these folks all visited the same Qatari whorehouse or are sleeping with one another. Or maybe this is the CIA's new Tuskegee study of untreated syphilis, because brain rot from syphilis is truly the only logical explanation for their bizarre, almost 180-degree Looney bin conspiracy crackpot QNON antics. I mean, Milo and Fuentis have had brain rot for much longer. Maybe Fuentas is patient X, who knows? However, the brain rot is rampant in this small group, and we're here to help. So at the Last Gay Syphilis Recovery Center, we're gonna expose some of the conservative media's most beloved darlings, according to the left, for the disgusting degenerates they've become in hopes that they get the much-needed help they deserve. So today we've got Tucker espousing that being gay is merely a response to childhood trauma. Should know, right? And Milo, the pedophile promoter, spewing his hateful take on homosexuality while bashing dead Senator John McCain and his family. Candace Crockett, I mean Candace Owens, uh, is now backpedaling on Charlie Kirk's conspiracies since she realized that the Diary of a Mad Black Woman sequel that includes bashing a grieving widow wasn't selling any tickets. And lastly, the very confused half-Mexican white nationalist Nick Fuentes was on wife beater Steve Crowder's show, blaming Jews for his and his family's very sad existence. Folks, why do loser people and their families always have to place blame? I mean, is that not the most anti-American thing possible? This country is one of the last places on earth where you can totally control your own destiny, yet millions of people still stand around and look outside of themselves to blame their problems on other people. Then you get to a point where entire races, religions, nationalities are to blame. That's the lowest of the low. That is someone who poops in their own diaper and blames the diaper company for getting it dirty. I mean, talk about his politics, his hate, racism all day, but at the end of the day, you can't really call yourselves a red-blooded American if you have to blame others, especially large groups, for your sad existence. And painting white males as victims just doesn't cut it for me, folks. All right, all that and more when we come back right after these words. Hey folks, it's Chad, the last gay conservative, here to remind you we're now on video. This episode and all others in the future may sound a little different than they did before because we're currently shooting in our new ultra modern 4K studio with beautiful desert views in Scottsdale, Arizona. Don't forget to tune in, like, subscribe, and watch the show on YouTube or anywhere you listen to podcasts. Just keep in mind the audio might be slightly different now that it's being repurposed for audio from video as we continue to expand our presence online. Again, thank you. You are the best, most beautiful, most well-informed, and smart audience in conservative politics today, and I'd be nothing without each and every one of you. Don't forget to go to YouTube, check out the last gay conservative, like, subscribe, and share. And welcome back to Wacky Wednesday America. Like I mentioned before the break, Fannie Willis had a full-blown meltdown in the Georgia State Senate hearings when they asked her questions about hey, what about this Trump case? What happened with it? You and I all know that this was a fake case in an effort to uh meddle in the election, using election interference as the excuse, and trumping up, for lack of a better term, RICO charges that were completely unprovable. Unfortunately for Fannie Willis, her unprofessionalism, lack of overall knowledge, education, legal proceedings. She's been in her job for a very long time, but she seemingly couldn't find her way out of a paper bag when it came to uh trying to prosecute Trump, hiring special prosecutors, managing a team, and it sounds like it became a uh balloon of constant unlimited expenses that are just gonna cost millions and millions and millions of dollars to the Fulton County taxpayers or the Georgia State taxpayers. I'm not sure how uh they divide up the revenue or how it's directly gonna be paid. I have a feeling that the state is gonna end up picking up the bill uh and the taxpayers of Georgia are gonna end up paying for this faulty prosecution of our president. Uh Fanny Willis was stupid, and this is why she was stupid. I don't know if she's a stupid person, but this is why she was stupid. She thought she could do what Letitia James and some of these other uh very, very liberal left blue district attorneys and prosecutors did around the country when they were waging lawfare against the president. And she thought she could get away with that in Atlanta. And Atlanta is a blue dot, but in a big red ocean of Georgia. She didn't think by any way, shape, or form, at least based on her responses, she didn't think when she brought this case on against President Trump that um she would be held accountable or have to answer any questions or do any sort of analysis afterward. Uh, because judging by her responses, she's completely unprepared. The answer was, I don't know, I don't know, I don't do that. That's not my job, followed by uh ranting and raving uh on personal issues that have no meaningful relevance to the line of questioning that was being asked of her, which is typical in liberal form. It's just stop, pivot, and attack personal, make it personal. We'll talk a little bit about her outrage and and some of the crazy assertions she was trying to make during the hearing about her own safety and how she's not been able to live in her house for many years. But the other point that I really want to drive home here with this uh rogue prosecutor problem is that how Fannie Willis didn't consider the fact that she was a blue prosecutor swimming in a red ocean in the state of Georgia with a very popular governor. Uh, and a very popular governor, but that won by a landslide, by the way. Um how she thought she could get away with waging lawfare against uh the most popular Republican president since Ronald Reagan without any repercussions from the right in state government is so beyond me. See, Leticia James can get away with murder. New York is a blue state, tried and true, over 30 years. They have a supermajority. They've rigged the system so Republicans cannot win there. They might have one or two uh in the in the state legislature, even, uh, might have 20% uh Republican representation. But it is a supermajority, it has been for many years, and they know that no one is going to prosecute Leticia James in the state of New York. No one. Same with uh Alvin Bragg. No one's gonna prosecute him in the state of New York or the city of New York. No one's gonna go after them. Uh the federal government can try, those are very difficult cases to bring. I'm not sure if if the case against Leticia James was even worth it, to be honest, but those are difficult cases to bring. But Leticia James was much smarter than Fannie Willis because she knew that her future is sealed being in a blue, deep, deep, blue, almost black state. Okay. Unfortunately, with Fannie Willis, that's not the case. Why would you trump up Rico charges and create such a spectacle when you're literally under the micromanagement and the microscope of a majority Republican state government? People say, Well, it's not political. Of course it's political. He was a president of the United States. Of course it's political. And her default is you come into my area, you commit a crime, I'm gonna indict you. He's gonna do it again, I'm gonna indict him again. Well, of course we expect you to indict criminals in your district. But what you can't do is draw fractured lines between legislation that's put in place, ignore the intention of the legislation, ignore the history of the legislation, and when I'm talking about legislation, I'm talking about RICO laws in general. She completely ignored the original intention of RICO laws, why they were put into place, how they were used, why they were used, why they're very hard to bring, and molded her case into the law versus finding the right law and violations of law for her case in the first place. And that's what they're doing. These people are looking for a law that suits their needs. And I believe it was Stalin who said, Show me a man and I'll find you a crime. In other words, rogue these rogue prosecutors are trying to create cases to stuff into law that works for them. And that's what she's been doing this whole time. Come to find out, she's sleeping with her special counsel that she hired. She's overpaying him. She's got resources out the wazoo, and tons of people are getting rich over this Trump case, yet she made zero progress on the actual prosecution. Folks, it is not hard to get people indicted, especially political figures that are radical or polarizing, like Donald Trump. Put the right people in a grand jury and you present your case in a certain way behind closed doors. This is why indictments happen nine out of 10 times for prosecution around the country. This is why prosecutors win 97% of the time around the country. Now, that does include plea deals, but I'm saying the prosecutions win 97% of the time because of the fact that they have the resources of the state behind them, and they can mold cases into the laws that they want, which is completely reprehensible behavior as a prosecutor. The law should be blind, regardless of political party, race, et cetera. And of course, no one in the Senate asks Fanny Willis about race. The first thing that comes out of her mouth is, why don't you ask me how many times they've called me the N-word? Again, how that's relative to her essentially letting ChatGPT write a case for her to fit into RICO. I mean, that literally, I think that's what she did. Her and that guy went on vacation, they went into Chat GPT and they said, Hey, ChatGPT, prosecute the president for election interference, but make sure it falls under RICO. And ChatGPT did that. I'm telling you, folks, this isn't that out there. I mean, judges are finding attorneys all the time. I get stories in my inbox all the time of judges that are citing attorneys that are using Chat GPT and it's made up case law. Attorneys are going to federal courts using ChatGPT at this point. So I don't think it's that big of a stretch to think Fannie Willis tried to use Chat GPT or some AI legal tool to try to prosecute Trump under RICO because those puzzle pieces were not fitting. And again, if you have a big high-profile case like that, it can be a good thing for your party, for your community to show the swift arm of justice going after true criminals, especially white-collar criminals, especially political criminals. So I understand how, if this was a regular case and not just made up, how spending that kind of money, having special prosecutors at 160 hours a week, which is four full-time jobs, by the way, I understand how sometimes that could be necessary. Analysts, researchers, paralegals, writers, I get it. I understand that that can be very valuable. However, just like any business, any government policy, any government program, even though for whatever reason the private sector, they ignore it, if you're spending, you have to be able to show that you're making progress towards the goalpost. And the challenge is that she could not get this case through because not only was it riddled with mistakes, errors, misquoted case law. I mean, it literally looks like the uh community law school could have written Kim Kardashian could have written her legal briefs. Let's just put it that way. So she puts this crazy case together. Then she's got all these personal conflicts of interest, and then she's got these law firms that are just cashing in. And meanwhile, they are the judge is issuing sanctions on the prosecution because they're missing deadlines, they're not following protocol. So eventually the buck has to stop. Even if the entire city of Atlanta was rallied around this case, eventually you have to be able to justify the money that you spend in order to achieve the results that you're looking for. That's called accountability. And boy, Fanny Willis, who I call America's DEI D A, is very, very either unused to, thinks she's too good for, or has never had to be accountable for anything in her life. Let's have a listen to some of her crazy outbursts.
SPEAKER_05:I don't review those documents, so you're asking me to look at documents that I haven't for the first time. What I can tell you is that I allowed Mr. Wade to bill 160 hours a week, and then Mr. Wade would be the first one in the office making sure that my staff arrived. He corrected their behavior. They thought that 8 30 minute 8 30, he taught them that 8 30 means. He got there before them. He left after him. He taught them how to do this case. And he was a leader to that team and a public servant. And for that, him like me has been threatened.
SPEAKER_01:All right. So that's a really interesting point that she makes there. She says, uh, first, she immediately goes to defend her boyfriend, Mr. Nathan Wade, uh, who seemingly is a very respectable lawyer. I I don't know why they didn't just date publicly and come out with it, and she could have recused herself, or he could have recused himself. And surely there's other great lawyers in Atlanta, and their love should have prevailed. But this is what happens when greed and putting party in power before all else and your people and your constituents, these are the results that occur: fraud, theft, waste, and major personal conflicts of interest. So the first thing she does is she defends him because they're questioning the billing. Again, 160 hours a week. That's four full-time people. That was just for his law firm, okay? Four full-time people. And I believe they were charging somewhere around$650 an hour. So do the math there. She says, Well, he trained my staff. He told them 830 means 745. Well, first of all, whose fault is that? Yours. It's your staff. He's the special prosecutor. That's like me saying, Oh, I'm gonna bring in a consultant for my marketing agency and then expect him to change the culture of my entire team. So, as a business owner or a leader, or basically she owns the district attorney's office as the elected head of law enforcement in Fulton County, she says, he taught my team how to show up the right way to work. I'm sorry, were you looking for a surrogate father or a special counsel? Which one? The fact that that is justification for anything is absolutely asinine. I'm sorry. But this is what liberals do. They get asked a question Mrs. Willis, Miss Willis, I'm showing$120,000 in billable hours from this day to this day. Can you tell me what you were working on at the time? You tell me how what I'm working on. You tell me what I'm working on. How many times they call me the N-word? I can't live in my own home. Well, that wasn't the question, Miss Willis. The question is, what were you focused on when you build X amount of dollars of tax break? I don't look at no reports. I don't see no reports. It's like all I can think about is Jesse Jackson in the late 80s going, stay out the bushes, stay out the bushes. It's like she is so nasty how she responds. And I'm sure I can't wait to hear everyone calling me a racist because I I'm speaking like a black person or whatever. I that's not what I'm trying to do. I'm trying to speak like her. But the point is that the chip on the shoulder, she is the typical diary of a mad black woman, insane, angry, spiteful, hateful woman. And how she was able to bamboozle the electorate in Fulton County to get elected, who would want someone like this leading law enforcement? Forget the fact that she's using Chat GPT basically to make up cases. That was the Trump case, but she's also done a terrible job with crime overall, which is why she's not there anymore. Let's keep listening to her wacky meltdown.
SPEAKER_05:Thousands of times. You want something to investigate as a legislature? Investigate how many times they've called me the N-word. Why don't you investigate that? Why don't you investigate them writing on my house? Why don't you investigate the fact that my house has been swatted? If you want something to do with your time that makes sense.
SPEAKER_01:Fanny, who reviews the improves the invoices? We've been through this. Well, not really, because we've been listening the whole time and you haven't said it. So this is what I'm talking about when I talk about these asinine arguments on the left. It's like just answer the question or don't show up. But don't try to pivot and then project your own insecurities about racism, crime. Of course, you're a public defender. You are in charge of criminal law enforcement for one of the largest metropolitan areas in the United States. And you think it's uncommon that you're getting death threats, you live in the Jim Crow South. You work in the Jim Crow South. There is still racism in the South. There's still racism everywhere, but there's significant amounts of racism in Georgia. It's one of the most racist, historically racist states in the country. And you want us to all be surprised that someone wrote the N-word on your door at home. That's not because you were indicting Trump. That's because you're the prosecutor and you happen to be black. And a lot of people are gonna hate you because you're putting people away. DAs always often have unlisted residences. They have to live in hotels, especially DAs that prosecute mob like Rico charges. They're oftentimes living in CD motels and having to completely stay off the radar and off the books because they're afraid for their lives. If you don't like being threatened, don't work in law enforcement. Okay? Fanny, how's that for an answer? Let's have another listen.
SPEAKER_08:I'm gonna refer you to the screen. Um, I know you said you don't approve of it.
SPEAKER_05:I don't know. I've never seen it, so there's I can't talk to you about documents. I don't approve and don't review. Can't talk to you about it.
SPEAKER_08:Who does approve the documents in your office when invoices come in?
SPEAKER_05:I thought we'd been through this.
SPEAKER_08:I don't believe you said who reviews the invoices and approves the invoices in your office.
SPEAKER_05:First of all, I have no first-hand knowledge of it.
SPEAKER_08:You have no firsthand knowledge of it.
SPEAKER_05:You want me to testify about something I don't have any firsthand knowledge of?
SPEAKER_01:I'm asking Then she says, I don't have any firsthand knowledge of it. She says, I'm asking you who approves the invoices. She has no clue. Her response makes me question a lot. First of all, she brought this case in 2020. Five years. Okay, it's been five years, and she's just now in front of the Georgia State Senate. Right. Where have the auditors and the people that are in place to hold these departments accountable for spending? I mean, I it was very clear that she was personally enriching her boyfriend through uh just the constant auto billing and the other lawyers that were part of the case as well that she had to hire. And that's the other really part of this that kind of chaps my ass a little bit. And I know sometimes it's necessary, but if you're not equipped to prosecute RICO without spending millions of dollars on outside counsel, should you really be the DA? Shouldn't you already have ADAs that specialize in RICO on staff? Shouldn't you have ADAs that specialize in white-collar stuff on staff? To hire basically four full-time people from one law firm, God knows what the other law firms build. But this is a multi, multi, multi-million dollar, multi-year lawsuit that yielded absolutely no results. And then she's pissed. People want to know what happened. What world does this woman live in? But there you go, folks. That is the epitome of Wacky Wednesday. We'll talk about someone even wackier and reparations when we come back with Jasmine Crockett. I think most of you know I like to wear a suit every day. However, it can get overwhelming with the dry cleaning costs and overheating with all the extra layers that I have to wear in and out of meetings, especially living in Arizona where it gets really hot. Well, let me tell you, I have found the answer. Twillery.com. Twillery is a men's apparel company online that specializes in something called the Air Suit. The Twillery Airsuit looks like an Italian handmade, hand-tailored suit, but it's actually made out of a basketball jersey-like material, if you will, that's stretchable, breathable, and you can't tell the difference if you're wearing your suit or your Lulu's. Not to mention, it has all kinds of fun little tricks like elastic in the waistband to help tuck in your dress shirt. Everything's machine washable and dryable, so you don't have to worry about dry cleaning costs. And it looks great. Did I mention it's really not that expensive either? Do yourselves a favor, go to twillery.com, T W I L L O R Y.com. Check out the Air Suit. They have it in your size, they have it in your favorite color. Get one today. You will look and feel your best, I promise. Welcome back to Wacky Wednesday, America. Interestingly enough, reparations is back on the table as the Board of Supervisors in San Francisco have approved reparations without funding. Okay. In typical leftist fashion. They create laws, they create policies, they create programs, pre-vote, pre-funding, pre-hearing, so they're ready to cut and paste out of any NGO or nonprofit or however else they can squeeze or steal the money. This is what they do. This is typical California politics, folks. Okay. They create these laws and they're just blanket laws. They're already ready to go, and then they swap the name, or they create this these programs and these funds. They have no funding, nothing's been voted on, but somehow money will magically appear into these programs and checks will start going out without any rhyme or reason. Look, look, it doesn't take a genius to understand that reparations would be harmful to the black community and to the recipients of reparations. But let me just tell you something from a personal opinion. This is 100% my personal opinion. It's not necessarily something that I want to see reflected in policies or programs. But if I'm going to pay reparations to anyone from this country, it's going to be Native Americans. Okay. Our Holocaust is the atrocities we committed against Native Americans, not slavery. Was slavery an atrocity? Yes. Was it awful? Yes. Was were the victims of it uh deserving of it? No. Was it completely inhumane? Yes. However, single-handedly erased Native American races and tribes off the map. We took tribes that had been here and moved them and then took their children, forced them into American names, forced them into these assimilation schools. And this is largely unpublished and untaught in public schools. These kids in elementary school learn how to make teepees and cornhuss dolls, but they don't understand the amount of abuse, killing, and atrocities that it took to get to this point. If I'm paying reparations, it's not going to be to the child or child or children or grandchildren or great-grandchildren of slaves. It's going to be to the Native Americans that we single-handedly destroyed. And whether or not the intentions were that negative is up for debate. But that is my personal belief. But we know, just like Native American communities know, just like blacks really do know, that throwing cash at a problem never fixes it. So what are we supposed to believe reparations are going to do? And that's what I don't understand. It's a feel-good talking point title, but what do we expect it to do? Is it going to lift all these black people out of poverty? Is it going to start all this black business? Is it going to uh create funds for the black communities to start doing more innovative and exciting things? I I don't know. I don't know. And that's, I think, the challenge and why there's so much resistance as well, because common sense says it's not going to work. And no one knows what the expectations are, because nothing like this has been done. Except for, I guess, maybe in the Arab Spring when all the revolutions were happening and the royal families that are still in place decided the only way they were going to stay in power was to start paying people. So I look at that and I say, okay, this is the Democrats just trying to remain in power with their uh majority popularity in the black community. That's all this is. It's a pay-to-play program. But again, what are the long-term? And if we're going to go start paying people for our historical atrocities, why stop at slaves? Because certainly the reservation programs, the assimilation programs, the things that we've done to Native Americans, uh and I don't think it's fair to compare. I'm not trying to make a comparison. Everyone's atrocities are terrible as it pertains to them. We all have our own stuff, and we all have our own history, and we all have our own shame that we have to carry. But handing out checks is not the answer. And you know how I know that? And I've written about this so many times. All you have to do is study people who have won the lottery to see what happens when people get large sums of money for nothing. Okay? Most people that win the lottery are bankrupt within 10 years. They piss away all their money. It doesn't stimulate the economy, it doesn't stimulate any markets. Oftentimes it's completely wasted. They end up in shambles, ruined families, ruined relationships. It doesn't work. Cash does not solve inequity. Period. And I know with punitive damages and on our civil system that sometimes there are, but you have to be able to prove fiscal loss. And it would be very, very difficult to make that argument from a case of damages and punitive damages when it comes to multi-generations later. So there's an article on the ABC 7 news up in San Francisco says San Francisco lawmakers vote to create reparations fund for black residents without initial funding. I think this is very important. The measure does not allocate any city dollars, a move that may have helped secure support from the board's moderates after repeated years of city budget shortfalls. Instead, the ordinance establishes the framework to receive future contributions, whether through city appropriations or private donations. Where do you think the private donations come from? Well, thank God we don't have USAID anymore. USAID would have already funded and been paying out reparations for 20 years if they could have. Okay, where do you think this money is going to come from? From private donations. Let me tell you, there are no billionaires standing in line waiting to fund free money for descendants of slaves. Because there's no return. There's no benefit. What happens? Nothing. Money gets spent. Sure, there might be a temporary up increase in the economy, but the inflation numbers that would have to correspond with printing that much cash completely deter any economic benefits in the long run. Just doesn't make sense, folks. One of the uh supervisors in San Francisco says this most certainly is different than asking the city to pony up dollars to support recommendations uh for reparations. Her name is Shaman Walton, who she's the author of the ordinance. She says it takes some time. We're gonna build a pot and then, of course, come up with the right criteria in terms of how we're gonna prioritize what recommendations we address first. But this is a major first step. Now, again, I know the messages that I'm gonna get. Chad, it's the county supervisors of San Francisco. Why do you care? They're so left, they're already socialists up there. Guys, have we not established that California, especially Northern California, is the Petri dish of testing for progressive policy? Okay. Anything you see in California is being tested to roll out nationally by the left. It is their petri dish. And the taxpayers of California have been funding this petri disc for many, many years. All the immigration stuff that you see Joe Biden when he opened those borders when he came in his first day in office. Guess where he learned all of that from? California. How did California set up the supermajority the way it is today? Illegal immigration was a huge part of that platform. Okay. Half the state didn't wake up Democrat one day. Okay, this happened strategically over time. So uh the article goes on to say the vote follows years of work by the city's African American Reparations Advisory Committee. Wow, say that 10 times fast, which in March 2023 released a sweeping draft proposal that includes over 100 recommendations. Those included one-time lump sum payments of$5 million to each qualifying black adult, guaranteed annual income of$97,000, down payment assistance, tax and debt relief, and affordable housing options, such as houses for just one dollar, marking one of the most ambitious reparations plans in the country. Again, Petri dish, folks.$5 million because God happened to make you born in a lineage of someone that happened to be a slave. And I'm not downplaying the fact that these people were slaves. It is horrific. I need to make it very clear that I'm not trying to downplay slavery, but what I'm trying to say is there have been so many horrible atrocities around the globe. And any attempts to fork out cash have only done one thing, which is keep certain people in power. Because the historical examples that we have of reparations, like I'm using the Arab Spring, for example, and then you know, examples of lottery winners and largely impoverished or uh the poverty line or middle class or lower middle class, whatever you want to say, come into a huge lump sum of money, it can be detrimental. And it will be detrimental. We have to prioritize prioritize the meritocracy. I mean, if anything, don't hand out reparation checks. If you want, if you have this funding, make small business, small black business, business grants, block grants. Empower the communities, give people funds so black people can buy franchises like in their communities and they can start their own businesses. I mean, these young black entrepreneurial Americans have ideas better than anything that I see in any other community right now. That's what we should be supporting, not free money because of your relatives. Again, it's a natural lead into my story about Jasmine Crockett because funny enough, from the time I recorded the intro to now, she's now been on a podcast talking about reparations. And the original Wacky Wednesday story was the fact that when she was just out of law school, she rented a car from budget rent a car with a career criminal that's been in and out of jail dozens of times and put him on as an authorized driver and then let him take the car, which we'll talk about more when we come back. But in the meantime, I want to play you a little bit of her word salad about reparations.
SPEAKER_06:There's some misinformation going around about your stance on reparations. Um, I guess just based off of someone proposed what we do with tax dollars, and you gave critique for the idea, but you weren't necessarily saying you were anti reparations. And you've told me you've become you've come lead on a couple projects with truth and reconciliation in the house.
SPEAKER_04:That's something that Barbara Lee was leading on, that I'm now working on. I think that anybody that knows me knows that. I'm a fan of making sure that people understand our contributions as well as acknowledging the harm that has happened as it relates to our people. And so for me, it's always been about what is it that we can actually get past?
SPEAKER_01:Okay. So she goes, hey, again, word salad. I love these people. These politicians are so funny. Direct most direct question in the world. Hey, there's some misinformation out there about your stance on repropriations. Do you support it? Yes or no? Well, yeah, but no, but yeah, but no, but yeah, but no. And then she gets to it and she goes, Well, it's just a matter of what we can get past. I just love these people. It's like, no proposal, no details, no nothing. What can we get past? What does that mean? It means absolutely nothing. She's saying that she only supports something that can get passed. Wow, that's interesting. I guess all those um Democrats that voted against the civil rights movement in the 60s felt the same way. I don't understand how you can be a black Democrat, the party of KKK, the party of Jim Crow, the party of slavery, a black Democrat talking about reparations. You wouldn't even need reparations if it wasn't for Democrats. And you're sitting here on a podcast for black lawyers talking about reparations for black people and the harm to black people, which I wholeheartedly agree with. The harm is reprehensible. And we should be open to these discussions if we can have meaningful conversation. But cash for feelings doesn't work for me, folks. It doesn't work for me. And so these politicians say, well, I'm not against reparations, I'm not for reparations, but I'm just for whatever can get passed. And then she, of course, has to credit the biggest degenerate in Congress, which is Barbara Lee, which is, well, one of them. They belong together, the two. Jasmine Crockett can be Barbara Lee's daughter. Let's have an additional listen to more word salad from Jasmine Crockett herself.
SPEAKER_04:I think it takes kind of some bold, unapologetic people to move the needle. We know that Donald Trump advocated for reparations for January Sixers, right? And so it's like, why is that not a big controversy, right? Like, I mean, that's that's a bit more controversial in my own.
SPEAKER_01:Let me just respond to that real quick. Why it's not a big controversy? Because it wasn't real. Okay. It was a few conservative people that brought it up. They floated it to Donald Trump's desk. And the reparation conversation at the time that he said it for blacks and descendants of slavery was very, very hot. San Francisco had just released their first proposal of five million dollars a person. And as America's grandpa, that's very much a victim of the time that he was raised, Trump, like most of our grandparents, I'm sure, says some crazy shit. We know that. This is another prime example. But was there ever a time in history or a place where Donald Trump or us as conservatives thought people that were in the January 6th mess, Joe Biden's unarmed insurrection? First time in history, folks, in the history of the world. The first insurrection, nobody armed. That's typical uh Biden management there. But no one in their right mind ever thought that January 6ers should get reparations. It was never a controversy, just like Trump never thought you should put bleach in a needle and inject it in your arm. Okay. Again, cherry pick the talking points, silly talking points, to avoid answering the question. Well, what does that look like? And then I love these journalists, so-called journalists, podcasters, whatever the fuck this woman is, saying, Oh, what does that look like? And just letting her go instead of saying, Well, actually, Jasmine, the Board of Supervisors in San Francisco is proposing this. This is what they're saying. If you're this, this, or this, you get this, this, or this. Do you agree or not? But they don't. They don't hold them accountable and to answer the direct question. So, City of San Francisco, now they have the reparation fund all ready to go. Now they just need to find some correct, corrupt NGOs. And let me tell you something else. There's something really shady about California politics. Um, in California, they have something called behest payments. And what it is is the governor of California leans on private businesses to make behest payments in the name of the governor to certain nonprofits. Well, of course, Gavin Newsom, his wife's nonprofit, is who gets all the behest payments. Perfect example. She got several million dollars in behest payments from United Healthcare and Blue Cross Blue Shield. Guess who got the exclusive no-bid contract for healthcare during COVID for illegal immigrants? United Healthcare, Blue Cross, Blue Shield. So we've got this reparations bank account set up. And now Newsom all he has to do is go lean on and do pay-to-play deals for behest payments into this for this to happen. And the second this starts happening in San Francisco is the second we have revolt all over the country. But I hope San Francisco passes this on its own. You would not believe the entire black population of America would be moving to San Francisco just to stand in line for these checks. Or this will put pressure along the nation because, again, California is the petri dish. Hope I'm making my point clear here, folks. There's no answer, end in sight, what it looks like. These politicians like Jasmine Crockett will only support something that will potentially pass, which is nothing. There's no way you're going to get a majority of Americans to vote on reparations. There's no way. There is way too much nonsense whether or not someone was an actual descendant of slavery, and then they couldn't find enough people, right? Because there's so many of the black people in this country now are descendants from, like let's say the Caribbean, whatever, that aren't direct descendants of American slavery. Okay, there's that population that has changed so much that they had to open up, okay, well, if you were a victim of the war on drugs or urbanization, right? So it's not just descendants of slavery anymore. It's all these other things. And they'll just continue to expand, just like they have with trans, gay rights, sexual orientation, and all the other wackiness that you see in the gay bay. All right, we'll talk more about Jasmine Crockett riding dirty with career criminals when we come back right after these words. I think most of you know I like to wear a suit every day. However, it can get overwhelming with the dry cleaning costs and overheating with all the extra layers that I have to wear in and out of meetings, especially living in Arizona where it gets really hot. Well, let me tell you, I have found the answer. Twillery.com. Twillery is a men's apparel company online that specializes in something called the Air Suit. The Twilery Airsuit looks like an Italian handmade, hand-tailored suit, but it's actually made out of a basketball jersey-like material, if you will, that's stretchable, breathable, and you can't tell the difference if you're wearing your suit or your Lulus. Not to mention, it has all kinds of fun little tricks like elastic in the waistband to help tuck in your dress shirt. Everything's machine washable and dryable, so you don't have to worry about dry cleaning costs. And it looks great. Did I mention it's really not that expensive either? Do yourselves a favor, go to twillery.com, T W I L L O R Y.com. Check out the air suit. They have it in your size, they have it in your favorite color. Get one today. You will look and feel your best, I promise. All right, and we're back to Wacky Wednesday, America, and I want to talk to you a little bit about Crazy Jasmine Crockett now running for Senate. By the way, if you didn't know this, folks, the only reason why she has to run for Senate is because they approved the redistricting map and she's out. She's bounced with the new map. So that's why she's running for Senate. She's not going to have a seat anymore when this redistricting map is completely finalized. Running for Senate, it is a joke. It is the funniest Senate race I have ever followed. I seriously love watching it. But uh Hudson Crozier, who is an amazing uh author and news reporter at the Daily Caller News Foundation, uh broke the exclusive. He dug deep and found out that Jasmine Crockett in 2006, right after she graduated law school, uh was clearly dating. It doesn't say that, but obviously she's dating. And I'll tell you how I know this. So uh there's an old comedian, her name was Samore. Uh, and she was part of this group called Queens of Comedy. I think it was in the early 2000s. And she talks about something called being dickmatized. And she says, you know, black women, you know you're digmatized when you let him drive your car, and you know he ain't got no license. And that's exactly what Jasmine Crockett did. She got turned on by the orange jumpsuit, added him as a co-driver to her budget rental car contract, and that motherfucker was gone. He went to Oklahoma so fast they couldn't find the car, crashed the car, destroyed the car. And what does she do? She avoids budget, and then as a new lawyer, she tries to like sue them, fight them in court. She ended up having to pay the company$10,400 for the damages, but only after trying to say that the original uh lease agreement was invalid, uh, that they were racist, that they were discriminating against her and her criminal boyfriend. And again, guys, look, I've done crazy stuff. I have a past. We all have a past. That's okay. When I talk about Steve Crowder, you made a huge mistake. That's okay. But what makes you a degenerate is when you don't own it and fix it. And so it's like, there's this person. She's obviously dickmatized, she's got her man, she's got the orange jump, he's got the orange jumpsuit on. She's really excited. You know, I don't know what these women get the hots for criminals. So uh she's really excited. No, literally, there's a whole website of mugshots for women to go on and pick like rate mugshots. Anyway, I digress. She's she's hot for this guy, bad boy, rents the car, says, Oh, here, baby, I'll put you on my lease. And then he takes off, ruins the car, and just instead of saying, you know what? I took the risk when I put him on my lease. I knew what he was all about. I knew this, I knew that. I'm sorry. Here's the money. And then go sue him to claw the money back. You know, that's what a normal person does in this situation. You know, I've been in situations where I've co-signed and I've done things that I probably shouldn't based on trust of someone else and gotten screwed over. I don't blame the company, I don't blame the bank, I blame the person. So just say you're sorry, or just come out and say, Yeah, I did it. So that's why I wanted to bring it up to talk about the character, because it goes back to people not being able to be held accountable. You put someone on a car lease, they screw it up, you're responsible as the primary signatory on that contract. Period. Just the way the world works. Instead, you drag them through court, make make it about race, make it about poverty, make it about crime, make it about invalid contracts. As a fresh lawyer, this is what you're doing? This is what you're doing in 2006, hanging out in the wrong crowd, which we've all done, making some bad choices, which we've all done, but then going after budget rent a car instead of just taking accountability, trying to counter sue and fight budget rent a car over 10 grand, which I know is a lot of money to some people, but over 10 grand? It seems to me that you could have borrowed that money from someone or figured it out and then gone after him. But again, birds of a feather fog together, folks. This guy's in and out of jail. Clearly, he doesn't like accountability either, or authority, or towing the line. So it just comes to show you the kind of person that she is. She's just a scoundrel, and she's obviously always been a scoundrel. And again, I've co-signed, I've done stuff for less, right? I mean, we all have. But when your name is on that contract, own it. How can you be a senator? One of a hundred people in the world that represent the United States, one of two people in Texas that represent your state at the United States Senate, the most prestigious legislative body in the world. And you can't even be accountable for the fact that you gave some guy a rental car in your name and he ruined it and you didn't want to pay for it? I don't get it. And we want to expect her to replace Ted Cruz, one of the most principled men in Washington? I don't know, folks. It just seems so bizarre that this would be coming out of a potential senator's background. Okay? This kind of stuff is okay for an ASB, you know, treasury or secretary, whatever the House of Representatives is. But to be a United States senator and to already show signs right out of law school that you can't handle being held accountable, you can't even bear the responsibility of putting your name on a rental contract with budget. Yet we want you to be in charge of appropriating trillions of dollars. No thanks. No thanks. And not to mention, folks, I'm still running the last gay conservative wig snatch contest. One million dollars cash to the first person who snatches her weave off her head in public. You heard it from me first. All right, we'll get into the left's biggest lies of the week in the last gay syphilis recovery center when we come back after these words. Hey folks, it's Chad, the last gay conservative, here to remind you we're now on video. This episode and all others in the future may sound a little different than they did before because we're currently shooting in our new ultra modern 4K studio with beautiful desert views in Scottsdale, Arizona. Don't forget to tune in, like, subscribe, and watch the show on YouTube or anywhere you listen to podcasts. Just keep in mind the audio might be slightly different now that it's being repurposed for audio from video as we continue to expand our presence online. Again, thank you. You are the best, most beautiful, most well-informed, and smart audience in conservative politics today. And I'd be nothing without each and every one of you. Don't forget to go to YouTube, check out the last gay conservative, like, subscribe, and share. All right, America! Welcome back to Wacky Wednesday, and it gets even wackier, believe it or not, as we talk about the left's biggest lies of the week. Serial left liar Joy Reed, or as my friend Charles Payne on Fox calls her, killjoy Reed, was ranting about how jingle bells is racist. Now, we don't expect anything less from the ultimate race baiter herself. She's a failed broadcaster who got pulled from MSNBC, who espouses all crazy sorts of conspiracy theories around Christian white nationalism, uh, Epstein, you name it, she's got a conspiracy for it. Joy Reed is black Rachel Maddow in conspiracy theorist clothing. And again, just like Tucker and all these other people, she lost her big fat salary. So now she has to rely on clickbait for clicks because that's how she gets paid. Paid per click, paid per subscriber. It's paid subscription content. I don't charge anyone. I don't think anyone wants to pay to see me. But these people, what they do is they get fired off their programs because, again, you know, they've lived off of their big salaries their whole life. They've never done anything really. And uh they get canned like Tucker. And so what do they have to do? Well, they don't have that automatic income. So they have to determine their income by getting more views, more clicks, more subscribers. And the only way they can do that is to be more salacious. So, what does she do? She misrepresents this post. A gentleman posted on Instagram, she reposted it, and it's a plaque in Medford, Massachusetts, and it says, Lord Piermont, James Lord Piermont, written the song Jingle Bells. Well, then she points to this report that was printed. Uh they're pointing to this report by Kina Hemel that was written in 2016, and it's a historical biography of the writer and the song, the history and the historical significance of the song itself. It talks about the author's racist past, but it doesn't directly tie the song to racism because you can't. I mean, jingle bells, jingle bells, jingle all the way. And so my question is what does Joy Reed think about the Indian jingle bells that's taken the internet by storm? Have a listen.
SPEAKER_03:Just hear those lay bells jingle linga ring a tinga tingle, ring a linga linga tingle.
SPEAKER_01:No. Uh honestly, this is the race baiting crap that we look at. It's the biggest lie on the left. Was the the guy, yes, he apparently was a racist. He was pro-slavery, he fought for the Confederacy, but it doesn't mean the song that he wrote was racist. Just because someone's racist or someone is something doesn't mean that every single thing is a reflection of that belief system. Okay. So a Satanist can write a decent song without it being about Satan. It's possible. Go figure. So who knows? Maybe this guy used Chat GPT in the 1700s to write the song. No. But uh I I honestly think that this is just a perfect example of the left's biggest lies because what it does is it showcases what they have to do in order to remain relevant, especially once they're off the air. Next, we'll go to the other proven left liar, twink of the week, Harry Sisson.
SPEAKER_07:Engineer Dean Kamen. And this is one of the photos that have been released. I'm sure you've seen it by now. The women's faces are blacked out for privacy reasons. And I always want to point out in this photo, and again, this is not getting enough coverage. Just look at where Donald Trump's hand is in this photo. You can see it right down here on this woman's waist uh or girl. And you know, Donald Trump is supposed to be, I believe, married in this photo. He's just a gross man, and that's you know, we've known that. But below look, below are some of the most suspect and disturbing images from Epstein's estate that we have so far.
SPEAKER_01:Here's one Trump Epstein who decided to promote this picture of Donald Trump with several Hawaiian tropic models that got dumped in the Epstein files. I'm sure you guys saw it by now. And of course, you know, the uh committee Congress has to black out the faces because the victims need privacy. No, these pictures have all been published before. These are nothing is the we listen, guys. I have been following Epstein for 10 years. We've learned nothing new in 10 years. Everything that's come up, I already knew. Now it wasn't necessarily confirmed 10 years ago, but it was what we already knew. Everything that you think you know about Epstein, you do. And it's it and it's done. The story is done. The guy is dead. Okay? This is just a distraction. So what do they do? They put up this propaganda to try to showcase Donald Trump with these women. Oh, look at him. And then he has the audacity to say, I think he was married at the time. Okay, are you the morality police now on the left? You guys want to be the morality police about him being married? I mean, come on, Harry. I know you know how to tap three times under the truck stop bathroom stall. Come on. I'm not morality policing you. You're gonna morality police the president from the left? Have you ever seen anything so ridiculous from the twink of the week? So they redacted it. Turns out they're all women of age, they're all Hawaiian tropic models. And of course, Trump, Trump owned Miss Universe. He's always surrounded himself with gorgeous women. Guess what? The American people don't care anymore. This whole concept of being presidential is so asinine and so old. I remember when Rudy Giuliani, America's mayor, the best mayor in American history, I would argue. At least for New York City. Giuliani's reign over New York City was the most prosperous, safe, and beautiful time for the city of New York. Period. He goes to run for president, and all the Bush Republicans at the time, oh, he's not electable because he's been divorced or he's had an affair. Well, boy, Trump sure took the fucking wind out of their sails, didn't he? Doesn't matter. People would rather have an a-hole CEO that keeps them all employed and paid than a nice guy that gets everybody laid off, but makes sure everyone has a baloney sandwich for lunch every day. That's the difference. So for this guy to be posting pictures, this Harry Sisson to be posting pictures, he has a very weird obsession with Joe Biden, by the way. He's obviously got major elder daddy kinks going on. But uh he posts this picture, and all they do is they just hint. It's like same with the ignore illegal orders. Well, what are the orders? Oh, I don't know. Who are these models? Oh, I don't know. So let's just try to trick the American people by lying and suggesting. And I swear he got his degree at MSNBC as well, with all the rest of them. All right, who's our next biggest liar of the week here? We've got Jojo from jurs. Jojo from jurs is claiming that as someone who's looked into the eye of her abuser, she knows. Picture of JD. It is so funny. It is so obviously AI. And this is what's so funny. Even before AI, I people don't understand how easy it is to doctor photos and videos. I mean, I'm doing this show on video for the first time now, folks. And I can tell you if I wanted to tell my editing team to make me look like an anorexic liberal, they could. Okay? You can edit anything. So again, the irresponsibility of Jojo from Jurass, she's the trashiest liberal influencer I have ever seen. She is total trash. She could be Snooky's sister, not looks-wise. She's actually very beautiful, Jojo. Um, I give credit where credit's due. She's she's a beautiful woman, uh, but she's an idiot. So it deters it and she's ugly on the inside. So anyone who's ever looked in the face of an abusive partner knows this is it. Talking about JD Vance. It's an AI picture. He's in a fucking sweaty tank top at a restaurant that's seemingly nice, a wine glass and things like that. Tell me something. One of the most photographed and videoed people in the world. He literally has a press core following him around, essentially 24-7. He's gonna go out to dinner with his wife in a tank top. I mean, any idiot can put two and two together that this is AI. Any idiot. And I love JD Vance. He just retweets it and says, Oh, yeah, because I always go out to dinner, take my wife out to nice dinner in a tank top. Because he doesn't care. He's the coolest guy ever. I love how he doesn't buy into this. Really, Trump could really take a page out of JD's book when it comes to this stuff. Trump gets so offended, and JD knows how to let it roll off of his back and play it cool. This is so obviously AI, but Jojo from JERS left liar. If you see anything that she's posting, 99% of the time, it's a lie. But doesn't this suck for people who really have looked at abusive partners in the eye? I mean, I've never been a victim of abuse, but I can tell you I've known several and I've worked in several organizations through Big Brother and Big Sister of America and Al-Anon and some of the programs that I've been through in my life and worked with abuse victims. And I can tell you, you don't post to a million people a picture that would trigger PTSD from abuse. You don't do that. So if you're saying, oh, this is an example of an abuser, and you post it for your million people, predominantly liberal women. Really? I mean, the irresponsibility is crazy to not even check a source. And this is the these are kind of low lives we're dealing with. And she's got a million people that follow her, a million people. She can post AI. It blows me away, the lies that they get away with. It is absolutely insane. If I posted this picture into this, I would have a mutiny on my hands. A mutiny on my hands if that was Joe Biden in a tank top and Dr. Jill Biden. Don't forget she's a doctor. All right, the AP was in hot water this week because they incorrectly claimed that Ted Cruz was threatening to shut down the government if new military flight restrictions weren't passed. A total lie. Nothing of the sort ever came out of his mouth. They published it on AP. These are the people that report on and call our elections, folks. Zero journalistic principles, zero fact-checking, zero ethics when it's any hit piece on the right. But boy, on the left, if someone were to write that about someone threatening a government shutdown about Jasmine Crockett, the AP, oh, the fact-checkers would be all over it. But instead, they politely take the article down. I think they might have issued a statement on social media. But that could have been detrimental to Ted Cruz, who's entering a Senate race. What are you doing? Stop lying. Get it together. I I this is the associated, these are the people of Woodward and Bernstein. And they're literally making up stories about a sitting U.S. senator threatening a government shutdown, which we already went through, so it's just completely heightened hysteria, and they just flame the fire and make it bigger and bigger and bigger, and then quietly take it down. Well, the damage has already been done, folks. The damage has already been done. And this is why when people criticize Donald Trump and people on the right who are going after these media organizations in civil court for billions of dollars because they've caused irreparable harm to their reputations in business and in their personal life. This is why I support it. Not to get rich, but because there's no other way these businesses are gonna learn. I mean, the Associated Press is the same people that refuse to call it the Gulf of America. Who cares? Just call it the Gulf of America. You're gonna sue the presidency over Gulf of America. Zero ethics, zero journalistic standards, huge lie, all about Ted Cruz. Hit peace, let it sit there, let the liberals run with it, let the Harry Sissons and the Jojo's from JERS run with this stuff, and then they quietly take it down. Totally unacceptable. Ted Cruz should sue them for that immediately. All right, and moving on from the left's biggest lies, we're gonna dive right into the last gay syphilis recovery center. As you know, this is a new segment of the show to expose the reprehensible and levels of disgust that are coming out of some previously conservative broadcasters' mouths, including Milo Yanninopoulos. Milo Yanninopoulos, I could not let this sit. Milo Yanninopoulos was on Tucker's show and went off about Meghan McCain being the ultimate fag hag. But I want you to listen because there's something, another small thing he says that I want to see if you all pick up on. Have a listen.
SPEAKER_03:Is there anything gayer than John McCain's like bloodlust? Or his proteges. Seen through this prism. I mean, he's even got the fat friend. It's his daughter. He even bred the fat best friend. Is there a more ostentatious like fag hag in America than Meghan McCain? You know, she hates herself, she's fat, she's crazy, she's every gay man's dream. Why is that every gay man's dream? Because they want to visit upon their female friends the cruelty they wish that they could perform on their mothers.
SPEAKER_01:So he says, is there a more ostentatious fag hag than Megan McCain in America? Well, uh what? Okay, first of all, you're not gay anymore. You don't get to say fag hag. You don't get to be a part of the club. So, no, she's not the premier fag hag, and you're not a fag, so you don't know what a fag hag is. Are you are you secretly both? I I don't understand that. But then he goes on to say that John McCain's bloodlust was gay. I mean, the guy just says everything is gay. Oh, you're gay, he's gay, he's gay. It's like, but everyone is gay but Milo, apparently. Milo is the only one who is not gay. So Benny Johnson's gay, uh uh John McCain's gay, and then it just is this is the most reprehensible, disgusting comments. No one should say about anyone. She hates herself, she's fat, and she's every gay man's dream, he says. And then Tucker says, Why is that every gay man's dream? And he says, Because the gay guys wish they could inflict the kind of pain on these women that they wish they would have done on their mothers. Well, I don't know about you. I don't want to inflict any pain on my mother. I know he has constantly tried to terrorize and torture his poor mother his whole life. He's admitted it. He is now talking about how gayness is a response from childhood trauma. However, he's the one that said repeatedly that a boy having sex with an adult male could be life-affirming. Well, I mean, can you state that as a matter of fact without having the experience? I don't think so. I think what's even most frustrating is that we know that Milo is nuts. We know he has brain rot. He probably has syphilis. The guy is a staple at all the New York and Washington, D.C. bathhouses. Okay. He is probably a product of incest, if you ask me. But there's something seriously wrong with this guy. He supports pedophiles by saying that pedophile sexual engagement is life-affirming for the boy. Then he runs to the most pedophile prone place in the world, the Catholic Church, to get converted out of homosexuality. Is that not the blind leading the blind? Or should we say the gay leading the gay? I mean, give me a break. So he gets to live out his altar boy fantasy with all the priests at the Catholic Church while they pray the gay away from him. And then we finally get this guy out. Because, you know, the reason the whole reason why I do what I do is because he came on and started establishing himself as a gay conservative leader, and I went, eh, not gonna happen under my watch. This guy's a freak. Milo is about Milo, he's about headlines. He's always been this way. Tucker wasn't always like this, but now he's gotta make up for his lost salary, so he's gotta go salacious. Milo was always this way. And I will give credit where credit is due. Milo was a fantastic editor and writer at Breitbart. Okay. I was a big fan of his when he was a writer. The second he put his, in his own words, faggoty ass on camera is the second I realized that he was a total fraud. He does not walk the walk. He talks the talk, and who knows what he's talking about now. But I think the most uh disingenuous and sad part of all of it is that we had him pretty much gone. He went and to the Catholic Church, he went to go live out his ultra boy fantasy, he wasn't really doing anything, and then he decided that he was going to try to make a comeback when Charlie Kirk was killed to use poor Charlie's name to self-promote, like all the other degenerates are doing. And then Tucker Carlson platforms him just like he did Nick Fuentas. It's like, what are we doing, Tucker? I mean, honestly, who is going to be your next guest? I mean, are you going to have a hologram of Adolf Hitler in your chair and your main cabin with all the antlers all over the place? I mean, who can be your next guest? You have literally brought on the most disgusting, low-life, hateful, discriminatory, un-American individuals that have ever existed in the world onto your show of millions of people because conservatives like me promoted you and loved you and supported you when you were on Fox. And now you're gonna give a mic to these people? And don't say, Well, I'm a journalist. I'm doing it. You're not a journalist. Okay, journalists report on the news. You're not reporting on the news. There's nothing new about what you're talking about. But second of all, these aren't interviews, these are circle jerks. Okay. You literally look like you are going to cream your pants. I swear. Tucker Carlson, I hope he was sitting on a shamwell when Milo made the comment about a gay man's dream and how they want to. I mean, he was going, whoa, whoa, as you saw in the video. Whoa, whoa. But you could see it was like he was excited about the hate that just came out of Milo's mouth. These people are feeding off of each other. They've become disgusting shock jocks of their own miserable existence. And the biggest problem here is that what he's saying is not true. It's very dangerous. And for the first time, log cabin Republicans has had more gay enrollment because of Donald Trump. Donald Trump is the most gay-friendly president the United States has ever had. Speaking from experience, uh he hosts the log cabin Republican Gala at Mar-a-Lago for free every year. He supports gays for Trump. He supports gays against groomers. He is a Manhattan socialite that was surrounded by gay guys all the time. Obviously, he appointed Scott Bissent, who's the highest ranking LGBTQ member of the government in American history. So when we look at that, and then we look at everything that Milo's saying, it's like we've made so much progress to make gay guys feel like that they can be conservative and be gay and be okay and be accepted and be a part of something. We've done so much work, and all this does is it just puts it all back. Okay, because true conservatives are not anti-gay. I mean, JD Vance is the first person to tell you, yeah, normal gay guys are just they're regular Republicans and conservatives. These are the people that I want part of my base. Trump wants part of his base. You know, we are not the religious alt-right that they want to make us out to be. But it sets us back. The whole part of the reason I do my show is because I get calls all the time from parents. Thank you. I'm a conservative Christian. My son came out before I found you. I had no idea that it was even possible for someone to have a good, live a good conservative Christian life and be gay at the same time. You know, and I'm not perfect by any means, but my point that I'm trying to make is that this sort of rhetoric is detrimental to the conservative movement because we have to appeal, as we have been, to the traditional Democrat holdouts. That's blacks, Latinos, LGBTQ, and young college-educated women. We have to become more accepted. Single young college-educated women are generally more Democrat. We have to take those populations and welcome them and understand that we are the sane alternative, and we don't care what's going on in your bedroom. But sadly, this is the crap that we have to deal with. This is the hate that we have to deal with. And he and he and Tucker has misused his audience for evil, and it's it's very disheartening to see because nothing good can come out of this. Nothing good can come out of what Milo just said. And it uh it really uh is hard for me to listen to because uh the hate is so prevalent, and the fact that Tucker doesn't even blink makes me realize that he's a rotten individual and probably has been for a very long time. And we're back to Wacky Wednesday America, and I want to start with a little joke. A wife beater and a half Mexican white nationalist walk into a bar. Oh, wait, it's not a joke. Steve Crowder had Nick Fuentes on his show last week. Hey, you can't get any lower than a woman abuser. Steve Crowder is a big man, too. He I mean, pfft, he is an abuser, tried and true, and he looks awful. God, here I am reverse aging. I've got more messages about my skincare routine than I do about politics. And this guy looks like he's about to check into Cancer Centers of America. Okay. Then he brings on Nick Fuentes, because of course you have to re-up the degenerate levels, right? Just like me, like I said in the introduction, I surround myself with fat, old, ugly people. So I look like the hottest guy in the room. So he's got to find someone worse than him. So what is below scum? I don't even know what's below scum, but he's got to scrape the bottom and get Nick Fuentes. Brings on Nick Fuentes. Nick Fuentes, who has criticized him up and down, says, Well, you're not as bad as the rest of them. And Crowder looks like he has an erection the size of the Eiffel Tower. He's so excited that he got praise from Nick Fuentes. What is wrong with these people? Ask the questions, Nick. Why do you blame large groups? Where is the science and any of this large preference data that you're talking about when it comes to trends, when it comes to property ownership, when it comes to wealth? There is no science. It's all false, it's all propaganda, and it's all clickbait. And the problem with Nick Wenders is that he has never single-handedly done anything for the conservative movement, period. Nothing. He's not he didn't do anything with Tea Party. He doesn't work with convention with us at the Convention of States. He's never gotten a candidate elected, never worked a campaign. Come on, people, give me a break. But 1.8 million people tune in to watch a wife beater interview a half Mexican white nationalist. And what I love is I was looking at Fuentes' family photos the other day. This is white, people, if you want to know. White is I can't drive a car without tinted windows because half of my arm will be sunburned and peeling the next day. That's white. Okay, you Mr. Arian, you are not Aryan. You are a tiny, tiny little Mexican man. Arians are massive big German blonde people, farming people, working people. You are tiny, meek. And your DNA test shows that you have 1% Middle Eastern and African in you. And there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. This is not a critique. This is me explaining how asinine this guy's opinions can be when the fact that clearly he disparages black people, he disparages Jews, he disparages Middle Easterners. Oh, and then and then he says, and the best part about my DNA is 0% Ashkenazi Jew. Well, first of all, Ashkenazi Jew, I mean, that's a sm that's a one population, one sect of the Jewish race or the Jewish religion or the Jewish faith or the Jewish populace, whatever you want to call it. That's one small area. Ashkenazi generally, from what I understand, represents more Eastern European Jews. That's what you see a lot of uh people that people that immigrated after World War II. But you also have Sephardic Jews. You also have Russian Jews. Some of them have bright red hair and blue and green eyes. So the fact that you're like, oh, I'm not Ashkenazi Jew, okay. What uh I mean, is that are you getting so are you niching down so bad that you're anti-Semitic, especially against Ashkenazis? They're the worst. You don't even know what you're saying, and you have black in your DNA. That's what I love. It's so funny. I mean, I hope I've never done a DNA test, but I would love it. I would own it. I would anything that I have, I love because I know God gave it to me. I'm not ashamed. There is so much shame and hate in this little child. And it's clear that I don't know. I think his parents might be cousins, first cousins, but that's again merely my opinion. No science data, nothing. Sorry if it's not true, but uh your eyes are a little far apart. You kind of look like ish. And trust me, I I'm no looker. I'm not saying he's ugly. Trust me, that's the pot calling the kettle black. But what I'm saying is is that for everything that he talks about, so he's so pro-white, he is so the opposite. Last name Fuentes, tiny little Latin male stature. Uh I mean, give me a break. And and you're you you're tan, you tan, you're dark, your mom's dark. He's just a picture of his dad wearing a Superman thing sitting back in a chair. What a degenerate loser. He might as well have a swastika face tattoo. Your children directly represent who you are. Look at the Bidens, look at Rob Reiner. Your children represent you as people. Sorry to say, that's why my mom is very proud of me. Because I reflect well on her. Hunter reflects exactly the way Hunter turned out is a perfect reflection of who Joe Biden is. So people say, oh, parents are off the table. No, not when you start talking about Ashkenazi Jews and spread hate. In the name of Christianity, conservatism, patriotism, all lies, false, brain rot. I mean, uh I don't even know if you guys can stand to listen. I mean, here's acclimated in conservative. You're not acclimated in conservative politics. You're not a you you weren't a fellow at the Hoover Institute. You've done zip zero, but run your mouth and hope you can say something so sensational and salacious that a bunch of people will click and you'll get a chunk out of the creator fund. That's all. That's all. Brain rot is rampant, folks. Make sure your conservative broadcasters get tested for syphilis. It's going around, it's being spread. I think Fuentes might be patient X. He might have been the first one. It also could be from Qatari Hookers. Again, personal opinion. It's Wacky Wednesday. I can say whatever the hell I want. And on that note, folks, I'm out of time. Thanks for tuning in to Wacky Wednesday. Let me leave you with what Reagan once said. We're all going to have to pitch in together, but if we refuse, if we go back to the old pattern of business as usual, then let there be no mistake. Business as usual will eventually destroy our prosperity and all the blessings it has given us. God bless you, President Reagan, and may God save America.
