Wrack Your Brain
#podcast #politics #twoidiots #veterans This is a show about everything and nothing. Part politics, part satire, all bourbon. Join Charles Fuks as he muses about current events, social issues, and whatever surfaces from the depths of his mind. If you walk away thinking about something in a different way leave a comment, like, share, and subscribe. https://linktr.ee/wrackyourbrainpodcast
Wrack Your Brain
Wrack Your Brain Episode 10
#podcast #politics #Veterans #twoidiots #SCOTUS #rights #principles #parentaldecisions #yourbodyyourchoice #bodilyautonomy
Episode 10. This is a show about everything and nothing. Part politics, part satire, all bourbon. Join Dominick Leon and Charles Fuks as they muse about current events, social issues, and whatever surfaces from the depths of their minds. If you walk away thinking about something in a different way leave a comment, like, share, subscribe, and perhaps support us monetarily!
Dominick has promised to wear a banana hammock live if we reach 200 subscribers on youtube by May 13th!
Music sourced from https://pixabay.com/
Background music is "Indie Folk (King Around Here)" by Alex Grohl
Listen and download from all the major podcast platforms: https://www.buzzsprout.com/1972050/
Add and follow on all social media:
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100080122945233
https://twitter.com/WrackYourBrain
https://www.instagram.com/wrackyourbrain/
https://www.tiktok.com/@wrackyourbrainpodcast
Send us something in the mail:
PMB 245, Suite 400
9789 Charlotte Hwy
Fort Mill, SC 29707
Support links:
https://www.patreon.com/user?u=73783602
https://paypal.me/wrackyourbrain?country.x=US&locale.x=en_US
https://venmo.com/code?user_id=3533895148504822097
https://cash.app/$WrackYourbrain
ladies and gentlemen welcome to may 5th 2022
0:25
racquetbring podcast with charles stukes and dominic leon happy cinco de mayo
0:31
may the fourth be with you and so on and so that's why you're wearing the star wars shirt that's when
0:37
we're in the star wars shirt that's not why we're in the cowboy hat so you're
0:42
you're the nerd that says may the fourth be with you i'm dressed but you're the cultural appropriator
0:50
that will put on the boots in the hat because it's cinco de mayo are we calling this a cultural report
0:56
i don't think we're calling this culture appropriation so first of all uh to any of our current and or most likely future
1:03
fans if you are from a part of the country that wears cowboy hats and cowboy boots i am not making fun of you i wish i
1:10
could walk around day to day wearing this why can't you she's nobody i don't think he'll be
1:16
upset nobody's stopping i get i think i get looks i feel like that good looks oh i'd look at you weird well aside from
1:22
weirdos like you i'm talking about like normal normal north carolinians anyway so this is not me making fun of
1:28
you this is an homage if you will and in fact when somebody is paying respect to
1:34
another culture by wearing for example their clothing it is it's a it's a
1:39
compliment and there is also a group of people out there that would say you are culturally appropriating
1:44
wow you're wrong for doing it i would the people that you're thinking of would only call the sculpture appropriation if
1:51
if i was wearing an article of clothing from a particular ethnic the people that i'm talking about or has blue or purple
1:56
hair weird lipstick and an obnoxious chunky glasses trump supporters
2:02
no no not at all okay um so let's let's well an announcement actually
2:09
we are i need to get a little bit lower lower we are we hit this week just
2:15
yesterday as a matter of fact 500 downloads on uh on podcast platforms that's right
2:21
and uh we're still only at 107 subscribers you know why that is right because nobody wants to see you in a
2:27
banana hammock that's true there's nothing to do people are like oh i would subscribe to these guys but they've threatened me with dominic and a banana
2:34
and the deadline for that has already come and gone no may 13. so we have one we have one more week if i could get us
2:40
97 i could get us 97 uh more subscribers on youtube you will
2:45
be wearing a banana hammock a banana hammock that says daddy
2:51
that's right i i'll also loan him my mug that says big daddy and b he'll be wearing a
2:56
banana hammock and if those cowboy boots fit i'd put those on too these would not fit no they
3:03
[Music]
3:11
anyway sure you have normal feet anyway okay so let's uh let's get into
3:19
into today's topic slash topics uh amber heard and johnny depp
3:25
didn't we talk about that no we talked about that last last time actually did we i think we did yeah because it's been going on for a while that's right
3:33
um we touched just a tip i don't know if there's anything anything more to say i think it's it's
3:39
where i'm i'm on the side of uh i would say johnny depp it appears as
3:45
though he truly you know his reputation was defamed for for no reason
3:50
that being said i think it's also because it and not to interrupt you but it says a lot about
3:56
how for example if you if he followed anything about the case
4:02
and you heard anything for example one of the recordings the amber heard recording you know it says a lot about what i
4:09
think a lot of people have been saying for years is it's a lot easier to see a man abusing a woman
4:15
and a lot easier to believe it than it is to believe a woman abusing a man although we all
4:22
know that it it has been been happening for years but people don't ever want to acknowledge it from that point of view
4:29
well so which is [ __ ] you know that's that that is correct at the same time though as far as amber hood and
4:35
johnny depp this is what i think we know there have been two two
4:40
uh court cases one was one was the criminal i believe proceedings against johnny depp uh amber heard accusing him
4:47
of of abuse and i believe he was acquitted of that right and then now the defamation lawsuit what we haven't seen
4:54
is a lawsuit saying that that johnny depp was a victim and that he was abused by amber
5:00
hurt right right so well you you said something earlier that made all the sense in the world and i and i think
5:05
some people do think that way and i think it makes total sense that even though there are most of america right
5:12
now or most of the world who's paying attention to this is going to side with johnny depp reality is you know the truth is
5:18
somewhere in the middle and that middle is what we're not seeing well and and but part of that middle is
5:24
that they were probably in some ways abusive toward one another whether whether both physically
5:32
uh or or at a minimum verbally right that that seems to have been the case um
5:39
it could be i mean you got to think about like an actor like johnny depp and at this point but he could be the sweetest person on the planet but in
5:46
public but in public but you got also remember this guy's been an actor for oh my god i remember him from 21 jump
5:52
street and i think his first movie was nightmare on elm street when he gets sucked into the bed wasn't john cena
5:59
dude i was talking i know i know what you're talking about so you know and then amber heard you
6:06
know she literally came out of nowhere isn't really a star she's been and she's an
6:11
aquaman i think but she isn't like this big known star like at the level of johnny depp so
6:17
perhaps you know she sees him as like you know like oh you think you're this big star
6:23
and maybe he treats her that way maybe he's like you don't know who the [ __ ] i am i'm johnny [ __ ] depp you know like
6:29
we don't know what goes on in the privacy of their own home we only know what's come out
6:34
right and we know that in these recordings a that neither one of them is particularly nice to the other although
6:40
johnny seems to be a little bit nicer which the recordings could be biased but what's definitely come out
6:46
from the recordings is that she hit him like no not like not like a love tap but
6:53
like she would smack him around and so that's not okay that's definitely not okay but again but going back to the
6:58
recordings it's a good point he's recording her in the moments when
7:03
she's being abusive towards him but there are no recordings of it being vice versa being you know him against
7:10
her so the recordings are biased and of course it's going to set a tone where you think oh well it's just her doing
7:16
this and i'm not saying he has or hasn't been abusive towards her but if we only get that perspective
7:22
from one point of view it's hard to you know to get a realistic kind of
7:28
grasp on what really has been going on in the privacy of their home and again a lot of the these witnesses
7:35
that's another thing you notice a lot of the witnesses what she had a former aide or a former assistant
7:41
you know who's to say like listen i've had bosses that i [ __ ] hated and even if they did something good you
7:48
know like yeah but you i hate your guts so i'm not going to back you up so then you get this former assistant of embarrassment
7:54
none of she was amber hurts of course she's just today no i think this was last week sometime of course she's not going to say
8:00
anything nice about her i've already seen the video like no no i know what i'm saying about is that up until today or
8:06
yesterday sometime this week but i think the last couple days it was it was uh
8:12
i don't i i'm not a lawyer so i don't remember he's the plaintiff or the faculty i believe he's the plaintiff he
8:18
was the plaintiff's case yeah yeah and and now he rested now it's the defendant's turn yeah yeah
8:23
but his friends have already come up and and they've already but the assistant was called for him
8:29
on during the plaintiffs yeah side yeah and so was one of his friends i think is
8:36
in his band that he's known for like 30 years um also a doctor that attended to his hand
8:42
i think when she threw the bottle at him and last week yeah cause she threw a bottle at him and
8:48
it cut the tip of his finger off that's not okay that's definitely not okay and um
8:53
but i mean again all the witnesses have been for johnny because that's the plaintiffs oh no i i
8:59
i get that but i mean now all the witnesses are going to be for her because that's her turn and who is she
9:04
who is she going to bring she brought i believe a psychologist
9:10
that she's pretty muslim doctor she brought a doctor that pretty much spoke out the things that if you actually
9:16
watch it and the the news on it it was her witness and the doctor kind of the the
9:21
testimony she gave they met last week mm-hmm that again they not her the blonde lady with the glasses
9:28
the one the psychologist the blind the one that had dinner with johnny depp yeah that was again that was for the
9:34
plaintiff that's not one of her witnesses you're forgetting last week last week i'm not forgetting a little bit
9:40
so so we'll see plaintiffs or johnny depp has rested and now it's her turn to call witnesses and
9:45
so far i think they've only her side has only called two witnesses uh one was i believe a doctor but i'm not positive
9:52
the guy was a weirdo voice it was it was a woman and i think it was yesterday or today okay uh and and her and amber heard herself
9:59
so so far they've only called two we don't know if they're gonna call more well today she was understanding she was accused of just separating a bunch of
10:05
things that she's on video doing herself which is very strange like you know we live in a time where it's
10:11
first she lied about the makeup and she got caught about that you know and that made it to the courtroom you know she
10:17
heard her lawyer was like she had to cover her bruises up with his makeup meanwhile the company was like we didn't even make that makeup yeah i'm like what
10:23
the [ __ ] you're trying to talk about and then she's like well that could have been that could have been poor
10:28
research let's say she was abused and let's say she did cover up her eyes no she said specifically i know i know i
10:35
know that right but it could be that she was abused that she was covering her eyeball the lawyer said
10:41
uh what makeup did you use and she was like i don't remember maybelline yeah and the lawyers were like okay
10:47
maybelline they went with that yeah but that's because their lawyers are [ __ ] students these people that's very good a bunch of momos like they're just not
10:54
doing what they're supposed to be doing i don't understand but i mean also look at the behavior of
10:59
amber heard in the courtroom and look at you know the things she's like they have to remind her hey the jet's coming in stand up you're like hey i think there's
11:05
even a a small clip of her lawyer saying you you're forgetting to look sad and
11:11
she's laughing and then looks up and goes yeah you know i remember it's like are you serious like well we don't know what he what what the lawyer told her we
11:18
just know that he whispered something and she went from laughing to to back to like acting like she was outside like
11:23
come on man like that's what a cracker [ __ ] so all we know is that they probably weren't
11:29
they where's what we know they were incompatible as a couple
11:35
they probably didn't do nice things to one another uh
11:40
and then after that it's it's you know assumptions and conjectures oh and another thing i heard is that people are
11:45
saying how come johnny depp has an accent from a place that doesn't exist and he's from kentucky and that's that's a
11:52
kentucky accent with years of drug abuse and living in california it's a mixture of maybe but i've heard
11:58
people saying like that's not that's an accident that's not even kentucky it's nowhere in the united states it's just
12:03
kind of like no no it's kentucky but it's also because kentucky my brother lives in kentucky there's different different accents but here's a remember
12:10
this is kentucky but he's lived in california for the past i don't know 30 years also he's been an actor who takes
12:16
on all kinds of all kinds of characters but also listen that guy was friends with uh what's his name um
12:22
the writer there was a prolific writer that would take mescaline and heroin and cocaine
12:28
uh hunter s thompson good friends with him and they would do drugs like crazy so this is years of
12:34
drugs years having an accent already from kentucky and it being bastardized with
12:40
the california accent kind of mixed in there and then johnny was friends with hunter biden hunter s thompson
12:48
all right look it's check the laptop
12:55
speaking of hunter biden now that the the guy who brought in the laptop is going to sue because he's saying that he
13:01
was they he's suing cnn he's suing a whole bunch of people saying because they called him a russian asset or some
13:07
[ __ ] because he turned into laptop to the fbi and now he's suing he didn't hear about that we're we're done with
13:13
amber hurt and johnny depp right oh we're now 100 100 biden's laptop that's my guy i'm okay i'm okay with that i'd
13:19
rather talk about that than i'd rather talk about uh our buddy our buddy e
13:25
e buddy e's uh conspiracy theories with the laptop than uh than
13:30
uh johnny depp and eberhood so all right um
13:36
yeah look i think people
13:42
people take the conclusion that they want from the existence of this laptop here's
13:48
what i've read snippets of what is on there uh chinese business dealings
13:55
uh maybe russian business the charisma dealings that's what i'm saying i haven't read any sorry let me
14:01
rephrase oh it's on there i've i've read it i can't i can't cite it right now for you but i've read it
14:08
and it says something about the chinese dealings were something about like we got to give the big man his cut and i
14:14
guess the big man they're assuming is his father but the barista dealings are only
14:19
for as far as i understand they don't really give out too much information other than
14:24
we know that hunter biden was on a board which we already knew so i guess that's my point that like
14:32
that like the fact that a laptop even if it does how do i put this
14:38
the the fact that he worked for ukrainian company or was on the board didn't need to be confirmed but even if
14:44
the laptop does talk about him being a part of a board my impression is that people have taken
14:51
that as like well we told you
14:56
that um that there was something shady and therefore it should have been investigated and therefore donald trump
15:02
was right in to request an investigation be open and therefore he shouldn't have been impeached that's the progression
15:08
that that that i think is a i get that and another point i want to
15:13
make too is you know when i said this to somebody else you know everybody's so up in arms about hunter biden and he's you
15:20
know on there's pictures of him smoking meth and crack and all this [ __ ] let me bring this point up
15:27
in the 80s everyone did cooking when you were on wall street
15:33
cocaine cocaine was so prolific i mean it was so normal
15:39
it might as well have been passed out at the at the [ __ ] at by the water cooler like okay hey like you want you want some cocaine or
15:46
some in the basket in the break room if you want everybody was doing it and also these big corporation people
15:52
these big corporate people if you think that a lot of them are not doing some [ __ ] up [ __ ] at home
15:58
they are doing some [ __ ] weird [ __ ] now most of them are not stupid enough to
16:03
put pictures on a [ __ ] laptop and prove prove that they're doing these things like this is a [ __ ] mobile
16:09
thing to do but you're not going to convince anybody that a lot of other these [ __ ] people
16:15
are not doing the same thing they're just not dumb enough i'm going to play devil's advocate okay
16:20
yeah maybe you're right maybe look but how many of you america is hiring prostitutes and doing all kinds of
16:26
things i'm going to play devil's advocate fine let's say that's right just not going to put it on the laptop let's say that's right how many of those
16:32
people are the son or daughter of a sitting vice president probably a lot they just don't
16:37
sitting son or daughter of a sitting vice president zero
16:44
unless one of them is that we know of again because they're probably not putting that out there what
16:49
no you know you're missing my point how many how many vice presidents are there right now right now united states
16:55
one how many kids does she have let's pretend three i don't know let's pretend three and let's pretend they're
17:01
they're corporate college they're not college but i don't know how many millionaires let's just say three i
17:06
should give birth i thought she was a man let's just say three okay um
17:13
and let's say they're doing cocaine and they're working for for big business okay three out of how many thousands and thousands
17:21
of business people who are doing cocaine that's that that's my point so here i'm i'm playing double that's an
17:27
easy target it's not even about the target i'm i'm i'm i'm pretending i'm a i'm a mega guy
17:33
right now you're pretending just because are you ready should i get my uh my
17:39
concealed carry piece no you don't have to you already look like you're carrying i want to
17:56
i hadn't even said it's a large caliber okay anyway lars still large board
18:05
anyway uh so let's pretend i'm a maggot guy just so fine it it's why do you have
18:11
to pretend though just admit it anyway so these these corporate guys that are doing drugs cool
18:18
that's none of our business what is our business is the is is what may have transpired between uh between the son of
18:26
a sitting vice president at the time and a foreign company and how did that influence that the pres the vice president's
18:32
actions were these things going on while he was the vice president yeah it was 2013 2014 something like that
18:41
uh and and i think we even know how much hunter biden was getting paid right now
18:47
and i think it was 200 i'm making that we could have been more i honestly but but we know the number
18:52
it's out there just don't remember okay so um but we we did we talked about hunter biden and bruised me i think we
18:59
were talking about ukraine one one of the times right and and uh my my understanding is that
19:06
um yeah there was a there was a prosecutor who was fired and one of the companies who was investigating the use of reason
19:12
in their ukraine um and it was it was he was fired because he was trying to investigate all the whatever
19:19
he was multiple companies corruption he was investing but a lot of the companies he was
19:24
investigating turns out he benefited his rich buddies yeah right and buried may
19:29
or may not have been in that category but since then i think it was a thing i
19:34
think it was more of the statements that biden made at the time going if you don't fire this guy we're not going to give you whatever aid i think and he
19:40
said that on camera which is what caused the stern i think you're no the stirrer was the star was that the
19:47
the son of a vice president was was on a board of affordability but this this is
19:52
i mean yeah but it's when president biden was the vice president and he was sitting and he on camera said
20:00
if they didn't fire this guy they weren't going to give ukraine the money for aid i have to research that i don't
20:07
know if we if we ever made made aid contingent uh contingents on that
20:14
okay cool factually um but i he here's here's
20:19
um here's the the last thing i'll say on that uh which is
20:25
which is that to our knowledge the relationship between hunter biden
20:31
and the then vice president and burisma and and whether or not there was any
20:36
nefarious acts was investigated by the fbi
20:42
that was that was done okay in 2006 ukrainian prosecutor general victor shulkin in his
20:48
investigation of corruption involving burisma holdings the natural gas company identified 100 hunter biden as the
20:55
recipient of over 3 million dollars from the company so let it keep going hold on
21:05
continue talking while i do this this no that was that was it that that uh to my
21:10
knowledge the fbi has had investigated whatever potential potential affairs
21:18
boom time to keep and uh
21:40
probably somebody else reposted it
21:48
i'm asking valuable questions let me listen to it what year was this video taken it wasn't 2006 he wasn't vice president of 2006.
21:59
hold on
22:05
2016 ukrainian prosecutor general victor shulkin and his investment 16 are six 16
22:10
okay but his corruption involves barisma holdings the natural gas company identified hunter biden as a recipient of over 3 million from the company not
22:17
wanting this corruption exposed joe biden swung into action using the u.s loan guarantees as hostage while
22:23
demanding spoken can be fired smoking loan guarantees it's it's different than
22:29
amazingly joe biden not brags about his actions in this matter okay well before he hit play again so
22:35
2016 he wasn't vice president hold on okay pause okay from 2016 he was talking about what
22:41
he did like two years before that so yeah okay
22:47
they did so they said i guess the 12th 13th time to keeve
22:53
and i was supposed to announce that there was another billion dollar loan guarantee
22:58
and i had gotten a commitment from poroshenko and from uh yachts in new york that they would
23:04
take action against the state prosecutor and they didn't so they said they had they were walking out to prescott said no i said i'm not
23:10
going to we're not going to give you the billion dollars they said you have no authority you're
23:16
not the president the president said i said call him i said i'm telling you you're not getting a billion dollars
23:22
i said you're not getting a billion i'm gonna be leaving here and i think it was about six hours i looked i said leave it in six hours if the prosecutor's not
23:29
fired you're not getting the money oh son of a [ __ ] got fired and they put in place someone
23:36
who was solid okay so
23:41
i think that that that was for the charisma doesn't really know but that doesn't that's not an opposition to anything
23:47
that i was saying which was that at some point he he was vice president and he was sent to ukraine to reduce corruption
23:54
and what it thinks he did was was pull his weight slash
23:59
flash u.s weight right to his position no no he wasn't the position he they
24:05
didn't fire the prosecutor because he was
24:11
vice president he fired him because he he had the authority from the president to to withhold something but you should
24:17
only get it if that you're in the position to do so i know but like that's my point though
24:23
you're you're that's not how most people use the term position if you if if
24:34
we're wasting time on this we could be recording we are recording don't worry we stopped recording
24:40
it's recording oh we've been on this all right we're back
24:45
we've been back we've been back this birth and it's really good
24:50
all right ladies and gentlemen sorry about that there's nothing to apologize for they didn't know anything no but i'm
24:56
apologizing because i'm completely i thought we were paused
25:02
never mind okay i'm gonna have a fun time editing this i
25:08
can tell you i'm already i'm already i'm already not looking forward to it anyway um okay so
25:15
i'm glad i'm actually glad this happened because um i don't actually don't even know how how
25:21
long the previous video was so hell knows okay we'll talk for another 30 minutes max because you got to do it
25:28
all right but i'm glad we're we're past barisma uh due to dude enough of our own but we've we've talked about that in
25:34
another episode the main topic of tonight finally 30 minutes in ish
25:40
uh is uh constitution rights how about principles
25:45
principles of of um of western democracy and also what the
25:52
question you presented to me in the in the kitchen to make sure that we run the same pages and i think a lot of people don't even
25:58
realize what is the job of the supreme court sure and i think from the perspective of
26:04
non-lawyers and i think people get it very very they're very confused as to what it is that they do and they don't
26:09
do okay so um where to begin
26:16
well the bottom let's let's start from the very very basic thing in the supreme court
26:22
is there to make sure that whatever is presented i guess as far as like when people want to pass a
26:29
law or something all they're supposed to do is just make sure it is constitutionally correct or the constitution is protected
26:36
by the constitution am i wrong or right well if if if a right if a right is
26:43
protected by the constitution at a federal level right at a federal level right but like even
26:49
and and i don't i don't know if every supreme court case is like this
26:55
but my it's a possibility that not every court case has to do with a right
27:04
some court cases have to do with like you said laws that were passed but do not meet how about this let's make it as
27:10
broad as possible the supreme court rules on matters to determine if they are
27:16
consistent with the rules of the government set out in the constitution right that's as broad as as i could say
27:23
whether it's easy to understand right whether it's a right whether it's a uh a law saying
27:28
whether or not a law could have been passed whether saying whether or not in a particular matter uh who has
27:35
jurisdiction for example they say no this matter belongs to a state
27:41
the federal government you can't do anything about this right which is why some of these weird wacky laws from like the 18 whatevers
27:48
have never been removed because it's it's the supreme court i think has established that well that's a state
27:53
thing no no no no like some of the wacky laws that we were talking about like you can't [ __ ] a goat after midnight
27:59
or i mean like sodomy is illegal in some way but it's it's not though that's right because it's not enforced but no it's
28:06
not that's been none of us just so this is what i'm trying to point out some some laws are still in the books in
28:12
some states for the mere fact that they haven't been removed right and it's not just that they're not enforced
28:19
they couldn't have forced it if they wanted to because it's it's inconsiderate inconsistent correct so so
28:25
there are states with with rules against it doesn't matter that they're still in
28:30
the books because because they they they weren't allowed to make those laws in the first place so right just because
28:36
they didn't scratch them out doesn't mean really it's meaningless it's it's it's
28:41
you know a what power the state versus the federal government has but also whether or not the supreme court has ruled on it there are other laws
28:48
for example that are still in the books but they might not have had a supreme court case
28:54
but they're also not enforced and they're not enforced because people recognize that they're stupid right but there's still the books right so it's
29:00
like but what about those that people don't like recognize that the stupid but their people still want to pursue which is you know and there have been cases i
29:07
mean i i can't think of one right now but i'm sure there have been cases it's like like why are we pursuing this why
29:12
are we going to such lengths to pursue something so stupid but some people uh do weird wacky [ __ ] like that people are
29:19
wacky well no i know that right but but so okay so there's we've identified two types of state laws
29:24
among other types one is a law that
29:30
for which there has been a related supreme court case and the supreme court case said no states you can't do that
29:36
but the states haven't gotten around to removing the the law and and they're not enforced not because
29:41
they're just not enforced but because the supreme court said no you can't do that and they didn't bother scratching that the other type of law is something
29:48
like that hasn't had a supreme court case i'm gonna make it up you you can't
29:56
any example that i'm thinking of is like a privacy thing but um oh oh oh uh
30:02
you can't wear like a certain type of outfit on sundays something like that okay oreo skirt has
30:09
to be three inches no more than three inches above your knee or some wacky [ __ ] like that so uh it's
30:15
here's why i'm going to say no to that one because that could be a public indecency law and state start allowed to okay
30:24
right so there might be in georgia you might have a law that says you can't wear a type of suit on on sundays and it
30:29
hasn't been enforced in 100 years but that but there's no supreme court case that would have been ruled out it just
30:35
it's still in the books but nobody forced it nobody cares it's nobody cares okay so so that's yeah but my point is like
30:43
if nobody cares that why is it still in the books because they just haven't gotten around to removing that's but that's the thing it's
30:49
government laziness that's the reality you know like t like you know you you figure if by the time we've established
30:56
that these laws are wacky and stupid you know the fact that i think it to a degree it
31:02
is government laziness but to another degree it's like are the governments kind of like holding on to these and
31:08
kind of you know like yeah maybe we can pull this out of my [ __ ] back pocket if anybody gets too goofy or hot you
31:14
know you're in trouble there there sweetheart well i'm doing this with one hand really oh i do a lot of things with one hand
31:20
you don't see me straining like you right now trying to pull something off of the other thing that you're doing with an end that's a weird that's a
31:26
great thing come on nobody said this show was not rated r but it was pg pg 17 or nc
31:33
17. nc 17 probably it's a more fitting it's a more fitting rating
31:40
it's a definitely more fitting rating than pg so okay well that was the pgp
31:45
just barely makes cinemax at 2 a.m skinny max
31:51
anyway cinematics after done okay it's just the performance where did cinemax die it was like this is it cinemax over
31:58
or is it still around know i think it's an app i think cinemax now is just an app like
32:03
hbo max or something hbo still wrong of course show time well i think actually i think showtime
32:10
was bought out partially by hbo yeah which is why it's called hbo max now i remember there were four
32:16
major channels on on cable that were like you had to pay for them extra every
32:21
month yeah it was hbo hbo showtime cinemax and one other one i think uh i think there
32:27
were four anyway hbo cinemax showtime and something else i mean
32:33
that's that's for the fourth one is to something else i can't remember i know so or maybe you're wrong maybe we'll
32:39
start so okay um so the supreme court so let's let's talk about some some principles
32:44
yeah okay is it true well
32:50
let's start with rule of law what do you know about rule of law you're going to talk about joe biden's
32:55
role of natural law because that's what we're talking about no no no no just the concept of rule of law and we we can get
33:01
to we can get to heaven okay well
33:06
uh some people would say well as long as your country has laws you get the rule
33:12
of law and that's not true and it's it's tough to define it but here are some principles um
33:18
here are some some consistent parts of the definition one um
33:24
like the fair treatment or equal treatment under under the the law okay
33:31
uh whether whether it has to do with individuals or whether it has to do with with a a particular legal principle
33:39
being applied no matter what okay um
33:44
i can't i can't think of one um okay i can think of one and this is this
33:51
is less controversial than some of the other ones i can think of which is you know how like when people when
33:57
people get killed uh when they have an interaction with the police some people are like good riddance they
34:03
were criminal well i mean morally maybe maybe you got a point there buddy
34:10
but under the law they were denied the opportunity to go to court and that's the problem i think people get there
34:18
people are are human beings are emotional creatures and they allow
34:23
themselves to be dominated by their emotions rather than rational thinking and and i completely agree with you
34:30
because the law states that we are if we're a country of laws that means for example but that that
34:37
flies so that means no matter how much morally we think somebody's doing something
34:42
[ __ ] up if they're child rapists or their murderers or whatever they are the the law applies to them equally
34:49
across the board to everybody every single citizen in this country it applies to them equally
34:56
whether or not we like what they did we still have to have them go through the legal process
35:03
and guess what sometimes a legal process [ __ ] up and you get the worst of the worst people and they let them go
35:09
because and i know that people are like oh yeah but that's [ __ ] up i understand that and i we
35:15
agree with you but again that's the way the law works if we let
35:20
ourselves rule the country by emotion half the [ __ ] country would be
35:26
lynched shot or you know or killed by some way shape or form only because
35:32
since our morals are so different what you do if i don't like what you do
35:37
i'm just going to shoot you or i'm just going to kill you because we're allowing morality to dictate what we do wouldn't
35:44
it that's not what this is what they call that partner the wild west
35:49
[Laughter] i had to do
35:54
but again we can't let ourselves be governed by emotions we if we're a country of laws that means we have if a
36:00
principle is is is considered a principle you apply it no matter what no matter how upset or how much it bothers
36:07
you and you know what that the really [ __ ] up thing about that is that people don't want to agree with that
36:13
until it applies to them everybody's so emotional oh you got to do this or this guy did that you should
36:19
hang in but what if somebody accused you of some doing some [ __ ] that you know you didn't do all of a sudden now wait a minute no
36:26
the legal system hold on it doesn't work both ways you either like the laws and you like
36:32
that we're right we have the rule of law yeah or you or you just shut the [ __ ] up or free speech or you shut the [ __ ] up
36:39
like oh we should have free speech no but then somebody tells you you're cancelled
36:44
because of what you said right that's like free speech that's just then you're like okay yeah okay you're so [ __ ]
36:50
so okay so principles that that's principle number one the principle number one that that we're
36:56
establishing is that the principles have to apply in every single scenario across the board okay
37:03
principle two the rights that are guaranteed to you in the constitution
37:09
stop the the at the at the location slash time and place location at the time and location
37:17
that they meet somebody else's constitutional protected race right agree yeah
37:23
not no at all that time no matter what well that's where the that's where the
37:30
rule of law is it really isn't when you if i am going to impose myself my
37:35
constitutional right but if i forcibly impose myself on you in any way shape or form i am violating your constitutional
37:43
right um not every time not every time so they here's
37:48
see but that's where it gets goofy fine uh well so so the print what the second
37:53
principle number two is that is that uh your constitutional rights stop when they meet somebody else's
38:00
the way the implication of that sometimes needs to be ruled on by the
38:05
supreme court because it involves a constitutional right well because it most invite
38:10
involves multiple entities not just human beings but corporations can be
38:16
constitutional corporations they consider corporations as people in some ways yeah but you can't murder a
38:22
corporation but like yeah they're they're they have some rights i'm sure you could no i mean you can't
38:27
some of these people can figure they'll buy out a corporation just to [ __ ] dissolve it and get rid of no no but that's not a murder that it didn't end
38:34
its life sure it did if they buy it out it wasn't alive okay there wasn't a lot of ceases to exist
38:40
wasn't alive by the way wwe bought wcw back in the late 90s
38:46
took their personnel and then just shut the company down they essentially but it wasn't exactly it wasn't alive oh it was
38:52
a slow miserable death for the wcw okay so sometimes
38:59
when when multiple entities rights meet
39:04
uh whether it's the same right meaning at the same time in place or whether it's different rights meeting
39:10
at time and place needs to be ruled on by by a higher a higher element okay
39:16
um next and i don't know if this is a
39:21
principle but let's let's try to apply it a little bit
39:26
okay i'm going to say one more thing and this isn't it's not a legal principle
39:32
right it's somewhere below it but this is this is something that i think most people would agree with
39:39
children under the age of 18 before the age of adulthood have some constitutional rights but they
39:45
don't have all their constitutional rights no because they're subject to their parental that's right so they have
39:51
constitutional rights but at a reduced quantity or value right okay
39:58
let's apply that or let's apply several things at once
40:04
some some why is that why is that though like what dictates why is it that a child
40:10
just because they're under the age of 18 because we we recognize full like i don't i don't think it's been
40:16
stated this way or maybe it has but essentially the day you turn 18 is when the
40:22
constitution grants you the full suite of of rights that you get before that
40:28
you you're you have less rights that's just and it says it somewhere uh sure in the constitution i don't
40:34
think so actually what about the bill of rights i could be wrong but i don't think so
40:39
i don't think the constitution says so then so they were assuming that just because you're under the age of 18
40:45
you're i mean i i understand that that's how we treat it but is it is it a fact we treat it as if
40:52
their constitutional rights are less than than when you turn 18 but is it a fact that your constitutional rights are
40:58
less than your attorney benefits your question your question is related to really after allergies no no what
41:04
we're just saying you just said yeah a child under the age of 18 has less rights under the constitution as an
41:10
adult and my question to you was does the constitution say that you said no
41:15
i said that's different that wasn't your question you asked if i said does the constitution ask that does the kind of to say that i
41:21
specifically said just that does the constitution say that under the age of 18 you have less rights you couldn't said it any other
41:28
way i'll answer your question in in a partial way
41:33
it depends on what you mean say because sometimes the constitution says things that it doesn't say in the constitution
41:39
and that's determined by the supreme court so what i want to know is does the constitution have anywhere in it that
41:45
says that you have less rights under the cut or less protections into the constitution if you're under the age of 18 i'll
41:51
answer i'll answer the question i think i mean exactly the question i'm posing i know but you
41:57
know me so i'm going to answer the questions that you should be asking which is has the supreme court
42:04
stated that the constitution has determined that says or states are written but that
42:10
that the cons per the constitution and have they i don't i think they have actually i
42:18
think they have um i can think of one example so i'm going to look that up for the next episode sure because i want to
42:24
know i i can think that doesn't make any that doesn't make any sense well before i ask you why that you don't
42:31
think that makes sense i can think of one example there there has been at least one supreme court case
42:37
that has said and it's a little bit different but but it has said that students
42:45
in in in k through 12 actually have less free speech than
42:51
other people the supreme court has actually said that now i don't know if that was because
42:57
their age or because they were in because of the ins organization that
43:02
they were inside that i don't know but
43:07
that sounds kind of goofy to me well but the reality is that is that
43:14
is that whether this well let me let me let me
43:19
go back so i think this the first amendment right doesn't apply fully to it to
43:25
a person under the age of 18 as it would if you were over the age of 18. yeah
43:30
that's my understanding depending on where you were at least in school that was that was at least in schools the
43:35
supreme court said no now it's actually applied it differently
43:40
for for other would there be a difference between private and public institutions uh i don't think so but
43:47
what there is a difference is between k through 12 and college now there's a correlation between the fact
43:53
that when you're k-12 you're under 18 and in college you're already over 18. so that might have something to do with
43:59
it but like basically basically they've said yeah college students have free speech even though they're on a college
44:05
campus and the college campus could say whatever they want about you know but they've also said to high schools
44:12
yeah you can limit you you can limit students free speech here's here's how i think it was taken
44:17
and again there's so many details which is because the colleges are run by private organizations and private investors as opposed to a public school
44:25
run by the state i don't think so things to do with the age of the people in those in those organizations
44:31
that's very discriminatory i mean what the fact that people under 18 have less
44:36
have less rights i mean less protections yeah to a degree i i would say yeah it
44:42
doesn't really make much sense well they have less protections under the constitution it don't it's no wonder
44:47
kids are are moved around in in such a way where you know it is
44:53
i mean maybe my problem right now is that i don't know how to articulate why i find
44:59
it disturbing well okay let's apply let's apply it let's make make some some
45:05
uh i'm trying to put the words together but let's let's let's uh create some scenarios where
45:11
if they did have equal rights parenting wouldn't work who makes medical decisions for a child
45:18
under parents well for a child under the age of 18
45:23
your parents okay well can anyone other than you as long as you're conscious
45:29
and uh and able to consent can anybody make a medical decision for you except for you
45:35
yeah why some of them don't i mean why
45:40
no more why more why i don't know because you have constitutional rights to your own to
45:46
yeah i mean right like the right to privacy sure sure probably how how medical decisions would be applied
45:53
or which which which right so to speak would apply the right to safety and security or the wrong person
46:00
which includes saying what people and cannot do to you medically well
46:07
under the age of 18 again and i don't know if it's been ruled it must have been ruled i can't
46:12
imagine some kid at one point didn't think they were slick and see something on tv and bring a case
46:18
but but i'd be shocked if there wasn't a supreme court case where the supreme court said yeah if you're under 18 you you actually have less constitutional
46:24
rights again because parenting wouldn't work now have there been times when somebody
46:29
under 18 is great is emancipated almost positive that's the word oh yeah they've had even mccullough culkin was
46:36
emancipated from his parents yeah that was a famous thing that's right
46:44
was emancipated from the he wanted to be completely separate from his parents
46:49
there you go [ __ ] parents so so you have to like petition the court and prove that like your
46:55
sound mind and and whatever it is you have to pray there was also like different circumstances as well because i think the parents were just taking all
47:02
his money well the other circumstance was the fact that he had a [ __ ] ton of money any other kid would be on the street at 12
47:08
right yeah if they got if they could even convince a judge to immense a bit okay so
47:15
i i think we're we're we're we have established that per the constitution you have less rights when you're under
47:20
18 because otherwise parenting wouldn't work okay well that's not why you have less
47:25
rights but like basically even though the constitution doesn't say um
47:31
you know if you are under age of adulthood you have less rights it doesn't say that right but i i get what
47:36
you're um so let's apply that
47:42
some twins are born conjoined
47:48
my understanding is the thumb twins are born born conjoined and one is gay and one is not
47:53
that'd be so weird that's actually i know i know it has happened who's anus is it
47:58
there's this there's there's these conjoined twins i've heard it i think that one is gay the other is not but they only have one [ __ ] but whose
48:05
[ __ ] is it both of their ass well they only have the one between yeah but typically like
48:10
only one controls one limb one leg and the other one controls one so like who controls the anus like who's pushing
48:16
when it's time to poop who's pushing the top the guy doing the [ __ ] that's his
48:22
best that's unfortunate it is because i mean and the thing is these ca these particular conjoined
48:28
twins it's not like they're side by side they're literally facing each other that's how they're conjoined i think
48:34
they're conjoined more like at the trunk here facing each other so it's like i don't know i don't even
48:39
know how that works how many legs do you have to hold up you know there's a uh there's a pretty faint
48:46
there you're gonna
48:53
conjoined twins they're they're they're women oh the girls are the teachers yeah they're teachers now and they date they
48:58
date that must be so weird you know i to it to some degree i think
49:04
it's only weird because we're looking at it from a perspective that you know we don't know them
49:10
and we don't know their environment we don't know what they're doing i think if we knew them personally and we knew
49:17
how they go about their day-to-day life and possibly their dating situation
49:23
you know i would think we probably wouldn't have a better grasp of understanding it but again
49:28
i'm not saying that these things are bad or i'm just saying that they're they're not a it's not a common thing right but
49:33
it's also unusual for us
49:40
and their teachers now those those girls yeah they get paid i think one salary
49:48
the school was basically like they get paid double no they don't get the double they get paid one salary
49:53
because the school the school basically said you know you can't be in two classrooms
49:59
at once and we pay like right right but what if one is writing on the chalkboard the other hits turned around going up
50:05
that's what they do don't [ __ ] spin any spitballs over
50:11
here i'm watching you right i'm writing and the other head's turned around yeah i can see what that's pretty sure that's
50:16
what they do okay so all right so here's why i bring up the ingredients is that i'm cool yeah if i'm
50:22
that you're listening if they're doing that god bless them yeah i made them that way god god doesn't make mistakes
50:28
so you're probably right yeah that's how
50:34
god intended them to be you're probably right in your statement
50:41
that doesn't mean that they weren't a mistake but that's all god doesn't make mistakes no no
50:47
your statement is correct i think your statement could be correct
50:52
it was a scientific like anomaly like you know perhaps but maybe god intended
50:58
them to be just like your statement may be correct
51:04
that doesn't mean that they weren't a mistake if you know you know i all right yeah now i got it sorry jesus wow you you are
51:11
morbid man oh my god well no i don't think you know what i'm saying i know exactly what i don't think
51:17
so what if the dead wasn't wearing a condom and
51:24
it's a philosophical thing if you know you know comment comment oh uh comment like share subscribe sponsor us by our
51:30
merch like and subscribe it really helps the algorithm subscribe we'll cute and we'll continue to make these videos if you
51:37
like them definitely we're going to continue but you know like and subscribe it helps our
51:42
algorithm download stream all that stuff okay and soon we're going to release that p.o box i've already released the
51:48
payment on this episode and every other episode we have to do the same thing what don't forget it's done it's
51:54
released and don't forget don't forget to uh follow us on tick tock instagram facebook uh yes add us add us as friends
52:02
and connections and and likes and talk all the [ __ ] you want because the sooner
52:07
or later i'll get to you oh uh we're we are on tick tock now we have we have some segments on tick tock
52:14
and uh clearly clearly one of us is getting under under people's skin i sure am you know
52:21
so okay i hope i am i hope i'm getting under your skin it makes you it makes
52:27
you think about what i'm saying i don't care whether you like it or not if it gets you wound up if it gets you
52:32
thinking about what we're doing they're thinking that just means they have a reaction to it which could be emotional exactly but they had to think about what
52:39
they were going to say before they put it into [ __ ] text you know everybody thinks about what they said before
52:45
absolutely not but you know that's what momo's do
52:50
shout out to all our moves okay mafia shout out to greg valentino in the moment mafia who greg valentino he knows
52:57
who he is okay he's the leader of the moment all right
53:03
uh okay so so conjoined twins right some and i don't know all the details but
53:10
there are there are times when conjoined twins are born matter of fact
53:15
maybe every time maybe whenever conjoined twins are born i believe parents are given the choice hey do you
53:20
want us to try to separate them i think if it's medically possible they'll do it but a lot of times they
53:26
they share organs and they they share well i think parents are all those even despite that i think parents are always
53:31
given the choice yeah and they're told one more both of them might we're both good
53:37
and sometimes parents choose to do it and sometimes they don't but the case with those girls the way they're conjoined i just don't see it being even
53:44
an option they're conjoined in such a way it's almost like they have one body that's just a little bit wider than
53:49
normal but their heads sit right next to each other oh yeah they're very different they've two different
53:57
i think they have two different brains and spinal cords uh one of them controls one limb
54:02
the limbs on one side will never control slims on the other side but i but i'm saying but to separate
54:08
them would be very very difficult because their their body is is so
54:13
together as one to a degree where it's like you'd literally have to be splitting them
54:19
it might be possible to separate them and then and then then one one is missing limbs on one side then one is
54:24
the missing limbs no it wouldn't be that way because they're conjoined too close to each other that would be possible if
54:31
you're talking about a dead even split down the middle and i have one leg you have another leg i have my right arm you
54:37
have your left arm that's great but these girls it's almost like here they if you look at them sit up a little
54:44
bit forward they are pretty much right wherever you are not dead
54:50
yeah so to separate them you'd have a spinal cord like the old lady in the wheelchair from spongebob going
54:55
chocolates chocolates you know that lady forget forget those two yeah and the two
55:02
guys you could possibly but they share one [ __ ] so how could you split those two who gets the [ __ ]
55:08
but that's okay you're you're i'm saying spitting some splitting isn't the right word i'm saying some conjoined
55:15
twins are not as easily separated as others maybe like the famous siamese
55:20
twins in that were in the ringling ringling brothers and barnum and bailey circus from pt barnum these siamese
55:25
twins were only conjoined by a small piece of piece of flesh right here they didn't share any organs they didn't
55:32
share really anything all they had was some veins you know so if one got sick the other
55:37
one got sick but they just that they could have been easily separated but they realized like hey this is like a
55:42
schtick we can make some money this is back in the pt bottom day so what is it the 20s i think or 30s
55:48
so of course they were trying to like if we can make money [ __ ] it let's make some money we're going to pause
56:07
outtakes gotta love them you talking yourself yeah
56:13
i said outtakes gotta love them you gotta save all these outtakes here i
56:19
think i saved them all right so separate's not the right word
56:27
separate implies splitting them in half well separate implies you you start out with two and one and
56:33
you're going to end up with two right eventually i think in a lot of different
56:39
situations would you let me just sit there and be pretty for a few minutes
56:44
conjoined twins they're two minds in one body the the amount
56:52
that the one is oneness is yes it's it's it varies
56:58
i this is my understanding it's always possible to separate conjoined twins
57:04
but sometimes when you separate them they both die and sometimes both survive and sometimes
57:10
only one survivor so it's always possible this might understand it's always possible to make a snip
57:16
by surgery okay the question is what happens after you finish the snake and so my understanding is that i mean
57:22
in that case anything is possible well it's just you're not really concerned with the outcome you just want to do
57:28
what you do well already knowing that the outcome is so sometimes sometimes conjoined twins are born right it's just
57:34
a little piece of flesh doctor says yeah we're pretty sure they're both going to survive we're just going to cut them apart okay maybe one will have scarring
57:40
and maybe deformed leg or something but yeah you're gonna still end up with two kids and sometimes they say hey look do
57:46
you want two kids with a very difficult life or do you want us to try to get you two
57:52
kids knowing that both might die yeah and sometimes one dies but not because
58:01
nothing i guess you could argue they couldn't split them down the middle but like sometimes they're like we need to
58:06
choose who will have a functioning body right like it's a full as much of a full
58:11
body a heart liver organs all that [ __ ] all that stuff right and so like
58:17
they're like hey look you know if if if if we do this surgery and it's and
58:22
once we get in there you know what both will die if we do a true middle split do you want us to choose
58:28
one they'd be like yeah we'd rather one you know if they if they're choosing to do the surgery right and so some parents may opt for
58:35
that yeah right and so in even in the case of these these two women that we were talking about
58:40
it might be possible to give one of them a full body and one of them death even today even as adults
58:48
but they now they're adults and now they would both need to consent getting back to where we were yeah yeah
58:54
but before they were 18 especially when they were born it's absolutely the parents i get what you're saying and they have the right to choose
59:02
to death they're choosing death potentially sometimes in some cases and that is their right
59:09
as parents well you did yes um well
59:14
as parents but but you're you're you're being too uh
59:21
uh non-non-constitutional about it they have the right to do that despite
59:27
their rights meeting another entity's rights
59:32
but but the principle is that one like we know
59:38
which one of their rights wins you know in another in another
59:44
example with rights interfering it's it's the the cake makers right not wanting to make cakes well what's one right i have the
59:50
right to my religion freedom of religion but what's another person's right i have the right not to be discriminated against because of my who i am right but
59:57
it's also there there's another sign and these a lot of these sources you ha i have a right to or
1:00:03
um what is it a right to admission or some [ __ ] so that the owner of the of the establishment doesn't want you to be
1:00:08
in there he can tell you to leave there's that there's there's i forgot what it's called
1:00:14
i don't remember but i know what you're telling me but here's my here's my thing yes somebody can determine who they want in their presence uh unless unless it's
1:00:22
for us a thing that's protected right but a gay a guy who makes cakes if
1:00:27
he doesn't want to make cakes for somebody who's gay then he doesn't have to well so again forget cakes and forget
1:00:34
gay freedom of religion someone's freedom of religion and someone's someone's
1:00:39
right someone's right to their to their expression of their religion uh and someone's right to not be discriminated
1:00:46
against for for being in a protected class this this whole protected class [ __ ]
1:00:52
is such a [ __ ] that listen is everybody protected equally under the
1:00:58
law then what the [ __ ] is this protective class [ __ ] you either because of that you're a person yeah but
1:01:03
before before any of this existed you had separation of races no i understand that
1:01:09
but what i'm saying that now that we've been past that then we're not past that to some people to some people we're not
1:01:15
which is [ __ ] ridiculous because they love to grab on to this [ __ ] that's just so empty and if the supreme court is
1:01:20
just an antiquated way of thinking and if the supreme court continues to say that that
1:01:27
decisions decisions of previous versions of the court
1:01:33
were incorrect because they said something was in the constitution that was not
1:01:40
and we're sending this back to the states there are people in some states that would want separation of races and
1:01:47
without the supreme court saying no that is that is to go back to the
1:01:52
definition we used before that is not consistent with the rules for our country that the constitution
1:01:57
has set out without without the supreme court doing that states are free to do that
1:02:04
sit where things like that and that goes back to the comment that we were talking about that uh that the
1:02:09
president made when are people gonna start treating each other like human beings well as long as
1:02:15
religion instead of just and that's just the problem and that that's what i have a big problem with i'm a religious
1:02:22
person but that's my business that's nobody else's business and the way that the people like to [ __ ] shove it down
1:02:28
other people's throats based on their morality versus versus other people's moralities it's just [ __ ] [ __ ]
1:02:35
you know i'm sorry we're human beings and everybody is an individual we all think different we all have different
1:02:40
likes and dislikes we all have different points of view no matter what we do in our lifetime or
1:02:47
the next that's not gonna change we are never gonna get to a point where everybody even in communist countries
1:02:54
they are told you have to think a certain way you have to be a certain way you have to do things a certain way but
1:03:00
you know they'll probably do it because they want to avoid prosecution they want to avoid persecution
1:03:07
but is that who they really are no they're human beings people want to do what they're doing
1:03:13
you know nobody's ever going to you're never going to have this universal morality you're never going to have this
1:03:18
universal way of thinking and until we realize that and we stop treating people as if that is going to
1:03:26
exist at some point in our life and just accept that hey he's jewish i'm not does that mean we're not gonna get along give
1:03:32
us a [ __ ] like people and some people some people they would see it that way they would
1:03:38
see it together oh where you're jewish and you're catholic you can't intermingle that's [ __ ] [ __ ] and
1:03:44
some people would say that if their religion says so then it should be the law yes that's like a lot of the muslims
1:03:50
that's a lot of muslims a lot of a lot of evangelical christians want and they think the same thing right which is
1:03:56
[ __ ] crazy uh look you're everything imagine how [ __ ] up this country would be if we
1:04:02
would allow the the the self-righteous [ __ ] religious people to to just
1:04:08
run wild with these laws and well you do
1:04:16
you know what i i believe it i believe it and they would resurrect billy graham to
1:04:21
run the [ __ ] country i mean we we live don't we live in the next to the billy graham should we sure
1:04:27
do libraries what are the one of the sites um so i mean in in generally
1:04:32
most of what what you said is right um about about live live and let live
1:04:38
but there was that time i saw you say to a man never been with a man
1:04:43
you're going to tonight and with that ladies and gentlemen
1:04:49
maybe 6 20 22 rack your brain podcast with dominic leon and charles
1:04:56
we'll see you guys next time take care
