Biblical Talks with Elder Michael Tolliver Podcast

Deep Dive: God's Goodness "Nearness Is the Good"

Michael Tolliver Season 5 Episode 149

Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.

0:00 | 33:33

Send us Fan Mail

Elder Michael Tolliver presents the goodness of God as an essential, unchanging attribute that defines His very nature and all His actions. The text argues that true goodness is not found in material wealth or physical comfort, but is instead embodied in the person of God and His presence. By analyzing Psalm 73, the author illustrates how human perspective often falters when comparing the prosperity of the wicked to the trials of the righteous. Ultimately, the source contends that God’s benevolence is most perfectly revealed through the gospel of Jesus Christ and His sovereign grace. Believers are encouraged to recognize that even in times of suffering, nearness to God remains the ultimate definition of what is good.

 

Each month, Elder Tolliver offers a spiritually encouraging book to help you in your walk with Christ for any size donation. Please go to biblicaltalks.com website to take advantage of this opportunity. 

Support the show

Have a blessed day, and thanks for listening! Visit my website to learn more at https://www.biblicaltalks.com

Framing God’s Goodness

SPEAKER_01

Let's deep dive and conversate the scriptures. Welcome back to the deep dive. We are uh we're back at it today, and we are tackling a subject that honestly, when I first looked at the title of the source material, I thought, well, okay, I know this. Right. Everyone knows this. It's it feels incredibly familiar. But the more I read through this text, we're looking at a sermon by Elder Michael Tolliver.

SPEAKER_00

Right, The Goodness of God.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. And the more I read it, the more I realized I have actually been looking at this entire concept through the completely wrong lens.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell Well, it's one of those classic cases where familiarity breeds uh well, maybe not contempt, but definitely a lack of understanding. Yeah. We think we know what a word means, so we just sort of stop thinking about it altogether.

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Powell Totally. And this word is goodness.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah.

SPEAKER_01

Specifically the goodness of God.

SPEAKER_00

Right.

SPEAKER_01

But before we get into the heavy theology of it, I uh I actually want to start with something way more mundane. I want to talk about your garage.

SPEAKER_00

My garage.

SPEAKER_01

Yes, you derive.

SPEAKER_00

You definitely do not want to talk about my garage. It is a total hazard zone right now.

The Storage Unit Paradox

SPEAKER_01

Right. And that is exactly the point. I was reading this statistic the other day while prepping for this deep dive, and I just can't get it out of my head.

SPEAKER_00

What is it?

SPEAKER_01

The self-storage industry of the United States generates something like $39 billion a year.

SPEAKER_00

Wow.

SPEAKER_01

That is billion with B.

SPEAKER_00

That is a staggering number. I mean, it's effectively an entire economy built on the premise that we have too much stuff and literally nowhere to put it.

SPEAKER_01

Think about the absurdity of that for a second.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah.

SPEAKER_01

We work hard, we buy a house.

SPEAKER_00

Right.

SPEAKER_01

The house has closets, it has an attic, a garage. We fill those spaces up to the absolute brim.

SPEAKER_00

Yep.

SPEAKER_01

And instead of saying, okay, I have enough, or uh maybe I should just donate this old jet ski from 1998.

SPEAKER_00

Right. We say, no, I need to rent a 10 by 10 concrete box three towns over to keep this stuff safe.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. We are paying rent for our junk.

SPEAKER_00

It's what you could call the storage unit paradox. We're living in this era of accumulation where we have so much perceived abundance that it actually becomes a burden we have to manage.

SPEAKER_01

It is overflow as a problem. Now, here is where the source material flips that completely on its head.

SPEAKER_00

Okay.

SPEAKER_01

Elder Tolliver introduces this concept of God's storage. But the difference is God isn't storing junk.

SPEAKER_00

Right.

SPEAKER_01

He isn't hoarding broken furniture or old clothes that are out of style.

SPEAKER_00

No. The text argues that God has a reserve, an absolute overflow, but it is an overflow of

God’s Infinite Reserve Of Good

SPEAKER_00

pure goodness.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah.

SPEAKER_00

It is blessings and favor and benevolence that are stored up specifically for those who revere him.

SPEAKER_01

It's a really fascinating image because we usually think of God reacting to us in the moment.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah.

SPEAKER_01

You know, we pray and he figures out what to do.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell Right. But this suggests he has a warehouse.

SPEAKER_01

Warehouse.

SPEAKER_00

Exactly. It's the idea that God is not scrambling. He isn't waking up in the morning checking his pockets and thinking, oh man, I hope I have enough patience to give to my people today.

SPEAKER_01

Or enough joy.

SPEAKER_00

Right. He has a massive infinite reserve.

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Powell, which sounds amazing, right? Like God has a warehouse of good stuff for me. Sign me up.

SPEAKER_00

Of course.

SPEAKER_01

But here's the catch, and this is really the core tension of our deep dive today. Okay. If that warehouse exists, and if it's so incredibly full, why are we all so miserable half the time?

SPEAKER_00

That is the critical question.

SPEAKER_01

I mean, if you walk down the street right now and ask a random person, is God good?

SPEAKER_00

Almost everyone says yes.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. Even

Redefining Good Beyond Circumstance

SPEAKER_01

people who aren't particularly religious will often say, Yeah, you know, the man upstairs is looking out for me.

SPEAKER_00

It's a cultural truism. God is good all the time. It's literally a call and response in many churches.

SPEAKER_01

You say God is good.

SPEAKER_00

And the congregation says all the time, it's reflex.

SPEAKER_01

But the source points out a massive disconnect here. If we really believe that in our bones, why are we so quick to complain? Right. Why do we spend 90% of our mental energy focused on what we lack rather than that warehouse of goodness?

SPEAKER_00

Because we have a definition problem.

SPEAKER_01

A definition problem.

SPEAKER_00

Yes. The mission of this text, and really our mission in this discussion, is to completely redefine what we mean when we use the word good.

SPEAKER_01

Because we treat it like a mood.

SPEAKER_00

Exactly. Or a stroke of luck.

SPEAKER_01

Right. Like I found $20 on the sidewalk, so God is good.

SPEAKER_00

Or I hit all green lights on the way to work. God is good.

SPEAKER_01

But what if I hit all red lights?

SPEAKER_00

Right. Or we complain. Right. The source is arguing that goodness is not a reaction to circumstances, it is a foundational attribute of God's nature that persists even when things are going terrible.

SPEAKER_01

Okay, let's unpack this. Because I think we need to start with the anatomy of this word goodness. That's it. The source makes a really strong distinction right out of the gate.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah.

SPEAKER_01

Goodness isn't just something God does, it's who he is.

SPEAKER_00

This brings us to what theologians might call the ontological argument for goodness.

SPEAKER_01

Whoa, pause. Ontological. That is a $10 word right there.

SPEAKER_00

Well no.

SPEAKER_01

You can't just drop that and keep walking.

Ontology Of Goodness Explained

SPEAKER_01

Break that down for us.

SPEAKER_00

Fair enough. So ontology is the study of being, existence itself.

SPEAKER_01

Okay.

SPEAKER_00

So when we say God's goodness is ontological, we're saying that goodness isn't just a habit God has picked up.

SPEAKER_01

It's not a behavior.

SPEAKER_00

Right. It is the very fabric of his existence.

SPEAKER_01

Okay, help me visualize that.

SPEAKER_00

Think of a firefighter.

SPEAKER_01

A firefighter. Okay.

SPEAKER_00

A firefighter does brave things. They fight fires, they save people. Sure. But when they go home and they take off the uniform and sit on the couch to watch a football game, they aren't fighting fires anymore.

SPEAKER_01

The action is separate from the person.

SPEAKER_00

Exactly. They can stop being a firefighter, they can retire.

SPEAKER_01

Right.

SPEAKER_00

But the source argues that God cannot stop being good.

SPEAKER_01

Because it's not a uniform he puts on.

SPEAKER_00

No, it's not a mood he's in today because he had a good night's sleep. It is his skin. It is his DNA. Wow. If God ceased to be good, he would actually cease to be God.

SPEAKER_01

That is a heavy concept because it implies that goodness doesn't really exist outside of him.

SPEAKER_00

Precisely. And the text actually dives into linguistans here to prove the point, which I found fascinating. Aaron Powell, yeah.

SPEAKER_01

Let's talk about the etymology of our English word God.

SPEAKER_00

Did you know where it comes from?

SPEAKER_01

Honestly, I assumed it just meant supreme being. Or maybe creator.

SPEAKER_00

It actually comes from the old Saxon root meaning the good.

SPEAKER_01

The good.

SPEAKER_00

Yes. So quite literally, for centuries, our language hasn't been able to distinguish between the deity and the concept of goodness.

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Powell They are completely synonymous.

SPEAKER_00

You cannot speak of God without speaking of good.

SPEAKER_01

Which leads perfectly into what I'm calling the separation clause in the text.

SPEAKER_00

Right.

SPEAKER_01

Because the author gets a little spicy here.

SPEAKER_00

He does.

SPEAKER_01

He argues that you can't have one without the other. He notes that society and schools and our culture try to teach values or morality. Trevor Burrus, Jr.

SPEAKER_00

Which is essentially trying to teach goodness.

SPEAKER_01

Right. While simultaneously removing God from the conversation.

SPEAKER_00

And the argument here is that this is a logical impossibility.

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Ross Powell But play devil's advocate with me for a second. Okay. Can't I be a good person without believing in God? I mean, I know plenty of atheists who are kind, generous, moral people.

SPEAKER_00

Sure.

SPEAKER_01

They return their shopping carts, they donate to charity. Is the source saying they aren't good?

SPEAKER_00

That is the crucial question. And the source isn't saying a person who doesn't believe in God can't do kind things.

SPEAKER_01

Okay.

SPEAKER_00

But it is asking a deeper question. By what standard are you measuring kind or good?

SPEAKER_01

The yardstick.

SPEAKER_00

Exactly the yardstick. If you remove God, who is the very definition of good, then good just becomes what I like. Or what society agrees on right now.

SPEAKER_01

And history shows us that what society agrees is good can change very quickly and become very, very dark.

SPEAKER_00

Precisely. So without the sun, that being God.

SPEAKER_01

You can have a flashlight, which is human morality.

SPEAKER_00

But the battery eventually dies.

SPEAKER_01

Or worse, you start calling the dark light.

SPEAKER_00

The source quotes Jesus on this specifically, Luke chapter 18, verse 19.

SPEAKER_01

What does he say?

SPEAKER_00

That says there is only one who is good.

SPEAKER_01

That is an absolute claim.

SPEAKER_00

It is. You cannot have the fruit if you chop down the tree. If you detach goodness from God, you're just left with human preference, which is incredibly shaky ground.

SPEAKER_01

It's like trying to have sunlight without the sun. You can't just bottle the light and get rid of the star.

SPEAKER_00

Great analogy.

SPEAKER_01

Now let's go back. Way back. The source traces this thread of goodness all the way to Genesis chapter one.

SPEAKER_00

The creation narrative. Yes. It's the refrain of the entire opening chapter of the Bible. God creates light, and what does he say?

SPEAKER_01

It was good.

SPEAKER_00

He creates the land.

SPEAKER_01

It was good.

SPEAKER_00

The seas. Good. It establishes

Language, Morality, And The Yardstick

SPEAKER_00

that the baseline for existence, the environment God intends for us, is goodness.

SPEAKER_01

But then, and I totally missed this in my previous readings of Genesis, the text points out the very first time God says something is not good.

SPEAKER_00

It's a really jarring moment in the text.

SPEAKER_01

This is Genesis 2.

SPEAKER_00

Right. Up until now, everything is perfect. Then God looks at Adam and says, It is not good for the man to be alone.

SPEAKER_01

What's fascinating there is that the not good isn't sin.

SPEAKER_00

No.

SPEAKER_01

Adam hasn't sinned yet. He hasn't eaten the fruit. The not good is a lack of connection.

SPEAKER_00

Precisely. It highlights that God's intention is always for a specific type of environment.

SPEAKER_01

He saw a lack which was solitude.

SPEAKER_00

And his goodness compelled him to solve it by creating a companion.

SPEAKER_01

But almost immediately after establishing this perfect goodness, we are introduced to the central conflict.

SPEAKER_00

The tree of the knowledge of good and evil.

SPEAKER_01

That tree is the stage for the battle. It sets up the choice.

SPEAKER_00

Right.

SPEAKER_01

But before we get to the fall, there's one more aspect of this anatomy of goodness I want to touch on.

SPEAKER_00

Okay.

SPEAKER_01

The interaction between Moses and God.

SPEAKER_00

Ah, yes. Exodus 33. This is a pivotal moment in the source material.

SPEAKER_01

Because Moses is basically asking for the ultimate VIP pass.

SPEAKER_00

He is.

SPEAKER_01

He asks to see God's glory. He wants the fireworks. He wants the cosmic light show.

SPEAKER_00

He wants to see the face of the Almighty.

SPEAKER_01

And God's response is so telling.

SPEAKER_00

It really is. He doesn't say, I will show you my power.

SPEAKER_01

He doesn't say, I will show you my wrath.

SPEAKER_00

No. He says, I will make all my goodness pass before you.

SPEAKER_01

Wait. So glory equals goodness.

SPEAKER_00

In this context, yes. The expert insight here is that God's glory is his goodness on display.

SPEAKER_01

That's amazing.

SPEAKER_00

When we talk about the radiance of God or the heavy weight of his presence, which is what the Hebrew word for glory, kebab, actually means. We are actually talking about the sheer intensity of his benevolence and character.

SPEAKER_01

So his goodness is the shiny part of who he is.

SPEAKER_00

Exactly. It's the radiance.

SPEAKER_01

I love that image. Goodness isn't a soft, quiet, passive attribute. It's the radium blinding glory of the creator.

SPEAKER_00

It's active.

SPEAKER_01

But and here is where it gets really interesting, and for where we have to get real for a second. If God is so radiant and good, and if he has this infinite warehouse, why does life often feel so

Genesis: The Pattern Of Good

SPEAKER_01

incredibly bad?

SPEAKER_00

And this brings us to part two of our discussion: the crisis of perspective.

SPEAKER_01

Because the source spends a significant amount of time analyzing Psalm 73.

SPEAKER_00

And specifically the figure of Asaf.

SPEAKER_01

I feel like ASAF is the patron saint of everyone who has ever looked at their Instagram feed and just felt totally depressed.

SPEAKER_00

That is a very accurate modern translation of his experience.

SPEAKER_01

Introduces to ASAF. Who is this guy? Is he just some random complainer?

SPEAKER_00

Far from it. Asaf isn't a nobody. He's a Levite. Okay. He is a worship leader. He was appointed by King David himself as a chief musician.

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Powell So he's not just a guy in the pews.

SPEAKER_00

No, this is a man who knows theology. He writes songs about God. He leads the choir.

SPEAKER_01

He's deeply embedded in the religious establishment.

SPEAKER_00

He is a professional believer. He's in the inner circle. He knows all the God is good chants we talked about earlier. Exactly. And Psal 73 opens with a statement that sounds completely right.

SPEAKER_01

He says, surely God is good to Israel.

SPEAKER_00

It's a true premise.

SPEAKER_01

But the source argues he draws the completely wrong conclusion from it.

SPEAKER_00

He thinks because God is good, my life should be smooth.

SPEAKER_01

I should have money.

SPEAKER_00

And the bad guys, the people who don't care about God, they should have it rough.

SPEAKER_01

This is the good life envy. And I think we all deal with this.

SPEAKER_00

Oh, absolutely.

SPEAKER_01

ASAF looks around and what does he actually see?

SPEAKER_00

He sees the wicked. And not just that they exist, but that they are doing great.

SPEAKER_01

They are winning.

SPEAKER_00

They are driving the nice chariots, their kids are healthy, they seem to have zero stress. He says their bodies are healthy and strong.

SPEAKER_01

They don't seem to be plagued by human ills.

SPEAKER_00

Right. So the people who mock God are winning. And Asaf, the worship leader, is struggling.

SPEAKER_01

And this causes a massive spiritual crisis.

SPEAKER_00

The text says ASAF nearly lost his footing.

SPEAKER_01

Because he looks at the wicked and assumes they are mocking God without any consequence.

SPEAKER_00

But worse, he looks at himself and falls into deep self-pity.

SPEAKER_01

He says, In vain have I kept my heart pure.

SPEAKER_00

That is such a heavy, brutal statement. In vain.

SPEAKER_01

He's basically saying, I wasted my time being a good person.

SPEAKER_00

Right.

SPEAKER_01

I follow the rules, I worshiped, I stayed clean, and for what?

SPEAKER_00

I'm suffering, and that guy over there who cheats on his taxes is living it up in a mansion.

SPEAKER_01

But the source notes that ASAF's

Glory Revealed As Goodness

SPEAKER_01

vision was entirely distorted here.

SPEAKER_00

He was painting with incredibly broad strokes.

SPEAKER_01

He exaggerated the happiness of the wicked.

SPEAKER_00

He looked at their highlight reel and compared it to his own behind-the-scenes footage.

SPEAKER_01

It's the classic social media trap, but thousands of years before social media even existed.

SPEAKER_00

Look at their vacation photos. They must be happy.

SPEAKER_01

He assumed they had no problems just because he couldn't see them.

SPEAKER_00

But he calls himself out later, right? He uses some pretty harsh language about his own mindset.

SPEAKER_01

He does. He confesses later in the psalm that he was senseless and ignorant.

SPEAKER_00

And that he was like a beast before God.

SPEAKER_01

A beast, like an animal.

SPEAKER_00

Yes. Think about how an animal reacts to the world. If a dog is fed and warm, it's happy. If it's hungry or cold, it's miserable and mad.

SPEAKER_01

It only responds to physical stimuli.

SPEAKER_00

Exactly. ASAF realizes he was judging God entirely based on his physical comfort level.

SPEAKER_01

Just like an animal would.

SPEAKER_00

He wasn't seeing spiritual reality at all.

SPEAKER_01

So what changes? Does he win the lottery?

SPEAKER_00

No.

SPEAKER_01

Does lightning strike the wicked guys in front of him?

SPEAKER_00

The circumstances don't change at all. The location changes.

SPEAKER_01

Ah. Verse 15 says Asaph entered the sanctuary of God.

SPEAKER_00

The sanctuary. It's the turning point of the entire text. Because when he gets into the presence of God, away from the noise, away from the envy.

SPEAKER_01

His perspective shifts from the immediate to the ultimate.

SPEAKER_00

He sees the end of the wicked.

SPEAKER_01

He realizes that what looked like stability was actually slippery ground.

SPEAKER_00

Slippery ground. That's a terrifying image.

SPEAKER_01

It makes me think of someone walking on a frozen lake that's just about to crack.

SPEAKER_00

It is. He realizes their success is a total setup. It's an illusion of security.

SPEAKER_01

Because without God, they are walking on ice.

SPEAKER_00

And their destruction when it comes will be sudden and total.

SPEAKER_01

He realizes that having it all without God is actually a nightmare scenario.

SPEAKER_00

Because it makes you feel self-sufficient right up until the moment you crash.

SPEAKER_01

So the shift wasn't that ASAF got what they had.

SPEAKER_00

No, it's that he realized what they didn't have.

SPEAKER_01

They didn't have a foundation.

SPEAKER_00

Which brings us to part three of our discussion: the true definition of good.

SPEAKER_01

Because ASAF walks away from this sanctuary experience with a completely new dictionary.

SPEAKER_00

He redefines the term entirely.

SPEAKER_01

His conclusion is the nearness of God is my good.

SPEAKER_00

Let's pause on that. The nearness of God is my good. Contrast that with his old definition.

SPEAKER_01

The old definition, the one most of us use by default.

SPEAKER_00

Is goodness equals no pain, no poverty, no sickness, plenty of comfort.

SPEAKER_01

If I have that, God is good.

SPEAKER_00

But the new definition, the one ASAF arrives at, is goodness equals communion, intimacy, and dependence on God.

SPEAKER_01

And there was a real paradox here that the source highlights.

SPEAKER_00

The prosperity of the wicked actually worked against them.

SPEAKER_01

Right. Their ease hardened their hearts.

SPEAKER_00

Because they didn't need anything. They didn't need God. It pushed them away.

SPEAKER_01

Meanwhile, Asaph's affliction,

Asaph’s Crisis In Psalm 73

SPEAKER_01

his suffering, his jealousy.

SPEAKER_00

It softened his heart.

SPEAKER_01

It forced him to run to the sanctuary. It forced him to lean on God.

SPEAKER_00

So in a strange counterintuitive way, the affliction was good because it produced nearness.

SPEAKER_01

Man, that is a tough pill to swallow.

SPEAKER_00

It really is.

SPEAKER_01

I think most of us, if we are completely honest, we want the nearness and the cash.

SPEAKER_00

We want the intimacy and the easy life.

SPEAKER_01

But the source takes a really strong stance here against what it calls the prosperity-only gospel.

SPEAKER_00

It does. It explicitly refutes the idea that health and wealth are the only signs of God's favor.

SPEAKER_01

There is this powerful anecdote in the text about Dr. J. Dwight Pentecost.

SPEAKER_00

I loved this story. It's so dramatic.

SPEAKER_01

Tell us about the medical test.

SPEAKER_00

So Dr. Pentecost is teaching a class or preaching, and he shares with the room that his wife had to undergo a very serious medical test.

SPEAKER_01

Presumably for something life-threatening like cancer.

SPEAKER_00

Right. The suspense is very high. And then he reveals the results came back negative.

SPEAKER_01

Meaning she's healthy.

SPEAKER_00

Yes.

SPEAKER_01

And naturally the room explodes.

SPEAKER_00

Right. The class shouts, God is good, praise the Lord.

SPEAKER_01

It's that reflex we talked about earlier.

SPEAKER_00

And it's a valid feeling. Relief is good.

SPEAKER_01

Of course.

SPEAKER_00

But Pentecost stops them. He silences the entire room.

SPEAKER_01

And he says something that just sucks the air out of the building.

SPEAKER_00

He asserts if the test had been positive, God is still good. Wow. That is the crux of the entire argument.

SPEAKER_01

God is good in opening doors and in closing them.

SPEAKER_00

In healing and in sickness.

SPEAKER_01

Goodness is a constant variable. Our circumstances are the changing variable.

SPEAKER_00

If your definition of goodness depends entirely on the test result, you don't have a theology of God's goodness.

SPEAKER_01

You have a theology of favorable outcome. Exactly. That leads us directly into the really heavy stuff. Part four suffering and sovereignty.

SPEAKER_00

Because if God is good when the test is positive and good when the test is negative.

SPEAKER_01

How do we process the pain of the negative test?

SPEAKER_00

This is where we have to be incredibly precise with our theology, or we end up really hurting people.

SPEAKER_01

Right.

SPEAKER_00

The source does not say cancer is good. Let's be very clear about that.

SPEAKER_01

Okay, because that sounds insane.

SPEAKER_00

Sickness, death abuse, betrayal, these are results of a fallen world.

SPEAKER_01

They are not good in themselves.

SPEAKER_00

No. But the text leans heavily on Romans chapter 8, verse 28.

SPEAKER_01

People misquote this verse all the time.

SPEAKER_00

Constantly. They say everything happens for a reason or it's all good.

SPEAKER_01

But the text doesn't say that, does it?

SPEAKER_00

No. It says God works all things together for good.

SPEAKER_01

Works. It's an active verb.

SPEAKER_00

It means God takes the debris of our life, the tragedy, the pain, the stuff the enemy meant for evil.

SPEAKER_01

And he acts like a master weaver.

SPEAKER_00

He takes that dark thread and weaves it into a picture that ends up being good.

SPEAKER_01

So he doesn't necessarily send the storm, but he uses the rain.

SPEAKER_00

Or even if he permits the storm, it has to pass through what the source calls the filter.

SPEAKER_01

Explain the filter. I found this visual really helpful.

SPEAKER_00

Imagine a massive fortress or a high security clearance zone.

SPEAKER_01

Okay.

SPEAKER_00

Nothing gets into the fortress without the king's explicit permission.

SPEAKER_01

Right.

SPEAKER_00

The source argues that for a believer, you are inside that fortress.

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Powell So if something even something terrible like a virus or a financial collapse or an attack.

SPEAKER_00

If it reaches you, it had to get a pass from the king.

SPEAKER_01

That is deeply comforting, but also kind of terrifying.

SPEAKER_00

It is.

SPEAKER_01

Because it means he let it in. He signed off on the permission slip for my pain.

SPEAKER_00

He did. And that brings us right back to trust.

SPEAKER_01

Think of a surgeon.

SPEAKER_00

Okay.

SPEAKER_01

If a stranger walked up to you on the street and cut you open with a knife that is assault, that is pure evil.

SPEAKER_00

Definitely.

SPEAKER_01

But if a surgeon cuts you open with a knife, you literally sign a waiver allowing him to do it. You pay him to do it.

SPEAKER_00

Why? Because I trust

Envy, Illusions, And Slippery Ground

SPEAKER_00

his intention is to heal me, not to stab me.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. I trust that the wound is necessary for a better outcome.

SPEAKER_00

The goodness is in the intent, not the immediate sensation of the knife.

SPEAKER_01

The source uses Joseph as the prime example here.

SPEAKER_00

We all know the story, but think about the brutal details.

SPEAKER_01

His brothers threw him in a pit. They discussed murdering him.

SPEAKER_00

They sold him into slavery.

SPEAKER_01

He was falsely accused of rape. He was thrown in an Egyptian dungeon for years.

SPEAKER_00

It is a literal horror story.

SPEAKER_01

If you were Joseph in the middle of that dungeon, you would not say life is good.

SPEAKER_00

No, you wouldn't.

SPEAKER_01

But years later, when he is ruling Egypt and he saves his family from starvation, he looks at those same brothers and says, You meant it for evil.

SPEAKER_00

He doesn't deny their sin.

SPEAKER_01

Right. But he adds, but God meant it for good.

SPEAKER_00

Two completely different intentions for the exact same event.

SPEAKER_01

The brother's intent was destruction.

SPEAKER_00

God's intent through the exact same event was salvation.

SPEAKER_01

That is the absolute sovereignty of goodness.

SPEAKER_00

It requires a massive amount of trust.

SPEAKER_01

It's easy to say on a deep-dive discussion, it is incredibly hard to live when you're sitting in the hospital waiting room.

SPEAKER_00

Exactly.

SPEAKER_01

Ideally, that trust is anchored in the ultimate demonstration of goodness.

SPEAKER_00

Which brings us to the gospel.

SPEAKER_01

Part five.

SPEAKER_00

The source argues you cannot understand the good news without first understanding the bad news.

SPEAKER_01

The bad news being that our personal storage units are totally empty.

SPEAKER_00

Worse than empty. They are in massive debt.

SPEAKER_01

The text says humanity is bankrupt.

SPEAKER_00

We are sinful, broken, and completely separated from God. We don't have any goodness of our own to trade.

SPEAKER_01

So the solution isn't just us trying harder to be good.

SPEAKER_00

No, it's goodness wrapped in flesh. The source presents Jesus as the literal embodiment of God's goodness entering human history.

SPEAKER_01

But there is a point here in the text that might ruffle some feathers.

SPEAKER_00

Discussion on sovereign grace.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, this was really interesting. And it honestly sounded a little harsh to me at first. The idea that God didn't owe us redemption.

SPEAKER_00

It's a critical distinction between justice and grace.

SPEAKER_01

Justice is getting what you deserve.

SPEAKER_00

Grace is getting what you do not deserve.

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Ross Powell The text points out that when the angels fell Lucifer and his followers, God did not provide a plan of redemption for them.

SPEAKER_00

They fell and they were judged, period.

SPEAKER_01

So he didn't owe them a second chance.

SPEAKER_00

Correct. And logically, he doesn't owe humanity a second chance either.

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Ross Powell If God were merely fair, we would all face judgment for our sin. That would be fair.

SPEAKER_00

The fact that he saves any humans is an act of sovereign voluntary goodness, not an act of obligation.

SPEAKER_01

That really changes the whole gratitude dynamic.

SPEAKER_00

How so?

SPEAKER_01

Well, if you think you're owed a salary, you don't thank the boss when the check comes you earned it. But if you receive a massive financial gift you absolutely didn't earn and frankly didn't deserve because you were a terrible employee, the gratitude is totally different. Precisely. It turns entitlement into true worship.

SPEAKER_00

And the source warns that this goodness isn't just sentimental.

SPEAKER_01

It's not just a warm, fuzzy feeling.

SPEAKER_00

No, it is meant to lead to repentance. There is a severity

Nearness To God As True Good

SPEAKER_00

to God for those who actively reject this goodness.

SPEAKER_01

It's an open door, but if you refuse to walk through it, the door eventually shuts.

SPEAKER_00

Okay. We've gone deep into the theology, the suffering, the filter, and the gospel.

SPEAKER_01

We have. But I want to pivot to something a little lighter now, something more tangible.

SPEAKER_00

Part six experiencing goodness in the everyday.

SPEAKER_01

The source talks about sensory goodness.

SPEAKER_00

I absolutely love this section.

SPEAKER_01

It's an argument from design, but focused entirely on pleasure.

SPEAKER_00

The author points out that God could have easily made food nutritious without any taste.

SPEAKER_01

We could have just eaten flavorless nutrient paste to survive.

SPEAKER_00

Like those sci-fi movies where everyone eats gray sludge. Here is your daily caloric intake.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. Or think about vision. God could have given us eyes that only see black and white outlines.

SPEAKER_00

Just enough to navigate and not bump into walls.

SPEAKER_01

But he didn't. He gave us a world completely saturated in color.

SPEAKER_00

The deep blues of the ocean, the vibrant greens of the forest.

SPEAKER_01

He gave us melody and birds. He didn't have to make birds sing, they could just squawk to communicate.

SPEAKER_00

He gave us fragrance and flowers. He gave us spice and sweetness.

SPEAKER_01

The source calls these the unnecessary extras.

SPEAKER_00

Unnecessary extras. I love that. They aren't strictly needed for survival, so they must be proof of benevolence.

SPEAKER_01

They are gifts.

SPEAKER_00

It's the creator saying, I don't just want you to live, I want you to actively enjoy living.

SPEAKER_01

It's a deeply affectionate goodness.

SPEAKER_00

It is. And to illustrate this trust in God's provision, this idea that He truly wants to give us good things.

SPEAKER_01

The source tells the grocery store parable.

SPEAKER_00

This is my absolute favorite part of the whole text. It's such a simple story, but it really hits home.

SPEAKER_01

It's a classic. So a little boy is at the grocery store with his mom.

SPEAKER_00

They are checking out at the counter.

SPEAKER_01

And the grocer, who is a really kind older man, offers the boy a handful of candy from this big glass jar on the counter.

SPEAKER_00

Go ahead, son, take a handful, the grocer says.

SPEAKER_01

And the kid just freezes. Which is weird because usually kids are like vacuum cleaners for sugar.

SPEAKER_00

Right. But he refuses to take it.

SPEAKER_01

The grocer tries again. Come on, don't be shy, take a handful. But the kid just shakes his head no. Finally, the boy looks up and asks the grocer to grab the candy for him.

SPEAKER_00

So the grocer, probably pretty amused, reaches his big hand in a bit, grabs a massive scoop of candy.

SPEAKER_01

Way more than the kid could have ever held.

SPEAKER_00

And dumps it into the kid's hands and his pockets.

SPEAKER_01

Later outside the store, the mom asks, Why didn't you just take it yourself? You're usually not shy about candy.

SPEAKER_00

And the boy delivers the punchline.

SPEAKER_01

He says, Because mom, his hands were bigger than mine.

SPEAKER_00

Boom. That is the lesson.

SPEAKER_01

It is so profound in its simplicity.

SPEAKER_00

We spend so much time trying to grab blessings with our own small hands.

SPEAKER_01

We rely on our own limited strength, our own limited wisdom, our own limited networking.

SPEAKER_00

We constantly try to force doors open.

Beyond Prosperity-Only Theology

SPEAKER_01

But trusting God allows for the handful of a king.

SPEAKER_00

It's about letting go of control to actually get more of the goodness.

SPEAKER_01

If I grab it, I only get what I can carry. If he gives it, I get what he can carry.

SPEAKER_00

And that requires resisting the urge to control everything.

SPEAKER_01

Which is exactly where the enemy attacks us.

SPEAKER_00

This leads us to the final section, part seven. The source argues that Satan's primary attack in the garden wasn't on God's power.

SPEAKER_01

No. Satan didn't walk up to Eve and say, God isn't strong enough to stop you.

SPEAKER_00

He didn't even start by saying God doesn't exist.

SPEAKER_01

He started by questioning God's goodness.

SPEAKER_00

Did God really say you can't eat that? Is God holding out on you?

SPEAKER_01

Is he keeping the best stuff for himself?

SPEAKER_00

That is the root of all temptation, isn't it?

SPEAKER_01

The suspicion that God is secretly stingy, that he's a cosmic killjoy who doesn't actually want me to have fun.

SPEAKER_00

That is the wedge. Because if you believe God is withholding something good from you, then obedience completely stops making sense.

SPEAKER_01

Why would you obey a God who doesn't want you to be happy?

SPEAKER_00

So the logic of trust is if God is good, then his prohibitions, the thou shalt nots, are actually for our good. Exactly. It frames the commandments not as arbitrary restrictions on our joy, but as guardrails for our absolute protection.

SPEAKER_01

If a good God says don't do that, it means that thing will ultimately hurt you.

SPEAKER_00

It's like a parent telling a toddler not to touch the hot stove.

SPEAKER_01

It's not because the parent hates the child, it's because the parent knows what fire does to skin.

SPEAKER_00

The antidote to Satan's whisper, then, is anchoring ourselves deeply in scripture.

SPEAKER_01

The source says we need to interpret life through God's character rather than interpreting God through life's circumstances.

SPEAKER_00

That is the key shift.

SPEAKER_01

If you interpret God through your circumstances, you will always end up confused or angry.

SPEAKER_00

Because circumstances change like the weather. One day is sunny, one day is a category five hurricane.

SPEAKER_01

If you judge God by the weather, you'll think he's

Suffering, Sovereignty, And Trust

SPEAKER_01

bipolar.

SPEAKER_00

But if you interpret your circumstances through the lens of God's unchanging good character.

SPEAKER_01

Then you have stability.

SPEAKER_00

You can look at a massive storm and say, I do not like this storm. It hurts.

SPEAKER_01

But I know the captain is good, and I know the ship is secure, so we're going somewhere safe.

SPEAKER_00

That brings us full circle to exactly where we started.

SPEAKER_01

We've covered a lot of ground today.

SPEAKER_00

We really have. We've moved from the storage unit paradox to the ontological nature of goodness.

SPEAKER_01

The crisis of ASAF, the redefinition of good as nearness, and the ultimate proof in the gospel.

SPEAKER_00

It's a really comprehensive journey. We've moved from a shallow God is good because I got a front row parking spot theology.

SPEAKER_01

To a deep, resilient God is good, even though I am walking through the valley of the shadow of death theology.

SPEAKER_00

So as we wrap up this deep dive, let's summarize the key insights for you listening.

SPEAKER_01

If you only remember three things from this hour, what should they be?

SPEAKER_00

First, goodness is a person, not a circumstance. You cannot have good without God. It is his very nature.

SPEAKER_01

Second, envy of the wicked ignores the much bigger picture. Their success is slippery ground, so do not trade places with them.

SPEAKER_00

And third, suffering is not evidence of God's absence. It can be the very tool he uses to bring you into his nearness.

SPEAKER_01

And I want to leave you with a final provocative thought, something to chew on as you go about your week.

SPEAKER_00

We talked about ASEF's profound conclusion. The nearness of God is my good.

SPEAKER_01

It's a very challenging standard.

SPEAKER_00

I want you to really ask yourself if you lost everything else, your wealth, your health, your comfort, your status.

SPEAKER_01

Would the sheer presence of God be enough for you to genuinely say life is good?

SPEAKER_00

That is the question that separates the theoretical believer from the one who truly knows his heart.

SPEAKER_01

And remember the image of the hands. Stop trying to scoop up life with your own small hands.

SPEAKER_00

Trust the big hands.

SPEAKER_01

Thanks for diving in with us.

SPEAKER_00

See you next time.

SPEAKER_02

Have you grown too comfortable with compromise? Is your sense of sin dulling under the weight of cultural excuses and moral relativism? The Vanishing Conscious by John MacArthur isn't just a warning, it's a spiritual defibrillator, jolting the heart of a church tempted to trade holiness for hallow approval. In a time when blame shifting, guilt denying, and sin sanitizing run rampid, MacArthur calls for believers back to the sacred urgency of personal holiness. This is a confrontation, gracious but unflinching. Drawing from the scripture with laser clarity, MacArthur shows that the path to peace and freedom run straight through confession, conviction, and courageous obedience. You'll be equipped to expose the cultural drift away from moral responsibility, recognize how sin disguises itself through modern justifications, pursue holiness that doesn't flinch under pressure, and reclaim the power

Joseph: Evil Reversed For Good

SPEAKER_02

of a clean, Christ-centered conscience. Not all will like it, but all should read it. Dr. Adrian Rogers, a prophetic word we must hear and heed. Dr. Joseph Stawwell. MacArthur reminds us why the conscious matters. Greg Lowry. This book isn't polite, it's prophetic. If you're weary of watered down truth and hungry for revival, the vanishing conscious will speak to your soul and stir it awake. For any amount of donation to Biblical Talks, we will send you the book. Please go to BiblicalTalks.com and click the Donate Here tab. Thank you for listening to Biblical Talks.

Podcasts we love

Check out these other fine podcasts recommended by us, not an algorithm.