Tax Changes Every Retiree Needs to Know in 2026

**Are your retirement plans about to get upended by tax law?** The One Big Beautiful Bill Act is reshaping the tax landscape for retirees in 2026, and waiting until April could cost you thousands. If you live in Florida or rely on retirement income, these sweeping changes demand your attention now. In this episode, we break down seven critical tax provisions every retiree needs to understand before filing their 2026 return. From Social Security taxation to required minimum distributions and estate planning implications, we explain how these shifts affect your bottom line and why proactive financial planning matters. Whether you're working with a fee-only advisor or managing your own wealth, understanding these changes positions you to make smarter decisions today. Don't let tax surprises derail your retirement strategy. Ready to talk? Schedule a complimentary discovery call at TDWealth.net. For educational purposes only. Not investment advice. 📖 Full show notes: https://tdwealth.net/tax-changes-every-retiree-needs-to-know-in-2026/

✅ BOOK AN APPOINTMENT TODAY: https://davieswealth.tdwealth.net/appointment-page

===========================================================

🔴 SEE ALL OUR LATEST BLOG POSTS: https://tdwealth.net/articles

Website: 

https://tdwealth.net

Social Media:

https://www.facebook.com/DaviesWealthManagement

https://twitter.com/TDWealthNet

https://www.linkedin.com/in/daviesrthomas

https://www.youtube.com/c/TdwealthNetWealthManagement

Davies Wealth Management

684 SE Monterey Road

Stuart, FL 34994

772-210-4031

DISCLAIMER

Davies Wealth Management makes content available as a service to its clients and other visitors, to be used for informational purposes only. Davies Wealth Management provides accurate and timely information, however you should always consult with a retirement, tax, or legal professionals prior to taking any action.

Transcript

SPEAKER_01 0:00

Imagine opening a bill from the government for like twelve thousand dollars.

SPEAKER_00 0:05

Yeah, not a fun day.

SPEAKER_01 0:06

Right. And it's not a tax error, it's uh it's not a scam. It's a penalty you triggered completely by accident.

SPEAKER_00 0:13

Aaron Powell Just by doing what you were told.

SPEAKER_01 0:15

Exactly. Just by following standard decades-old retirement advice. So if you think your retirement plan is rock solid, you might be overlooking a hidden surcharge that could drain thousands of dollars right out of your cash flow.

SPEAKER_00 0:29

Aaron Ross Powell It really is the ultimate blind spot for high-income earners. If you spend your entire career doing everything you're supposed to do right, you build this highly optimized nest egg and then bam, you get handed this five-figure invoice that you just never saw coming simply because of, well, a bureaucratic math equation.

SPEAKER_01 0:46

Aaron Powell And today we're decoding that exact equation. We are pulling from a really fantastic, highly detailed guide on Medicare, IRMAA planning.

SPEAKER_00 0:55

Aaron Powell It's a great resource.

SPEAKER_01 0:56

It really is. This comes to us from Thomas Dadies at Davies Wealth Management. They're a fee-only fiduciary advisor over in Stewart, Florida. And the mission of this deep dive today is to, well, to decode this bizarre hidden tax trap.

SPEAKER_00 1:12

Aaron Powell And you know, give you the actual proven strategies that high earners use to protect their wealth.

SPEAKER_01 1:16

Aaron Powell Right. Because as the source makes very clear, you just cannot afford to plan for this in the dark. Okay. Let's unpack this. For the uninitiated, we need to talk about what IRMAA actually is and like the completely bizarre mathematics behind it.

SPEAKER_00 1:30

Aaron Powell Sure. So um IRMAA stands for the income-related monthly adjustment amount.

SPEAKER_01 1:35

Okay, quite a mouthful.

SPEAKER_00 1:36

Yeah, very government. To strip away the jargon, it's basically an income-driven surcharge that gets tacked onto your Medicare Part B and Part D premiums.

SPEAKER_01 1:44

Right.

SPEAKER_00 1:45

But the way it functions is entirely different from the tax systems we're usually used to navigating.

SPEAKER_01 1:50

Aaron Powell How so? Like different from federal income tax.

SPEAKER_00 1:53

Exactly. With normal federal income tax, we have a graduated bracket system. So, you know, if you cross into a higher tax bracket by one single dollar, only that specific dollar is taxed at the higher rate.

SPEAKER_01 2:05

Right. Marginal brackets. It's like uh you only pay the higher toll on the actual miles you drive in that new zone.

SPEAKER_00 2:10

Perfect analogy.

SPEAKER_01 2:11

Yeah.

SPEAKER_00 2:12

But see, IRMAA doesn't care about marginal brackets.

SPEAKER_01 2:15

Yeah.

SPEAKER_00 2:15

What's fascinating here is that it operates on what we call the cliff effect.

SPEAKER_01 2:19

Cliff effect. Okay, that sounds dangerous.

SPEAKER_00 2:21

It is. The thresholds are absolute cliffs. Okay. So let's look at the numbers for 2025. If you're a married couple filing jointly, the base tier allows for an income up to$212,000.

SPEAKER_01 2:33

Okay.$212,000.

SPEAKER_00 2:35

Right. And if your income is exactly that,$212,000, you pay the standard premium. But if you earn$212,000 and one dollar.

SPEAKER_01 2:43

Wait, literally one single dollar over that line.

SPEAKER_00 2:45

Just one dollar. That one dollar pushes your entire Medicare premium for both you and your spouse completely off the cliff into the next much more expensive tier.

SPEAKER_01 2:54

That is brutal. I mean, so one extra dollar of income could theoretically trigger thousands of dollars in annual surcharges.

SPEAKER_00 3:01

You've hit the nail on the head. And uh if you compound those cliffs and hit the highest tiers, that same married couple could pay over twelve thousand dollars a year just in extra Medicare premiums.

SPEAKER_01 3:14

Oh wow.

SPEAKER_00 3:15

Yeah, that is 12 grand coming directly out of your retirement cash flow post-tax every single year.

SPEAKER_01 3:20

Aaron Powell But you know, the truly mind-bending part of this isn't just the sheer dollar amount, it's the timing.

SPEAKER_00 3:26

Well the look back, yes.

SPEAKER_01 3:27

Yeah, the look back. Because the Social Security Administration bases your premiums on your tax return from two years prior. So your 2025 Medicare premiums are dictated by what you earned in 2023.

SPEAKER_00 3:38

Aaron Powell It's super counterintuitive.

SPEAKER_01 3:40

It really is. I I mean, why on earth does the system operate on a two-year time delay? It's like getting a massive speeding ticket today because of how fast you were driving two years ago. How does anyone successfully plan for a penalty that is basically operating on a two-year time delay?

SPEAKER_00 3:55

Aaron Powell Well, it comes down to a massive administrative bottleneck between two very slow-moving government agencies.

SPEAKER_01 4:00

Aaron Powell Ah, government efficiency. Trevor Burrus, Jr.: Right.

SPEAKER_00 4:03

When the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services say CMS, when they need to calculate your premiums for the upcoming year, they have to ask the IRS for your income data.

SPEAKER_01 4:11

Okay. Makes sense.

SPEAKER_00 4:12

But if they ask the IRS in the fall of, say, 2024 to set your 2025 premiums, well, your 2024 tax return obviously doesn't exist.

SPEAKER_01 4:21

Oh, true. You haven't filed it yet.

SPEAKER_00 4:23

Exactly. And depending on extensions, your 2023 return might have just barely been processed. So by default, the system relies on the most complete, finalized data they have, which is always two years old.

SPEAKER_01 4:36

Aaron Powell So my future premiums are essentially held hostage to an IRS processing lag.

SPEAKER_00 4:42

Basically.

SPEAKER_01 4:42

And that completely changes the timeline for retirement planning. I mean, if you wait until you're 65 and enrolling in Medicare to actually think about these brackets.

SPEAKER_00 4:50

But concrete's already tried.

SPEAKER_01 4:51

Yeah. You've already set a trap for your 65-year-old self based on the income you generated at age 63.

SPEAKER_00 4:57

Which is exactly why the planning has to start in your late 50s. You're playing a game of chess, but with a two-year lag on the board.

SPEAKER_01 5:05

Man, okay. So to avoid stepping over these cliffs, we first have to understand how the government actually measures your income.

SPEAKER_00 5:12

Right. The formula.

SPEAKER_01 5:14

Because they aren't just looking at the bottom line deposit in your checking account, are they? They use this very specific metric called MGI.

SPEAKER_00 5:21

Modified adjusted gross income.

SPEAKER_01 5:23

Yes, M-A-G-I. And reading through this Davies guide, this formula contains a very nasty surprise for retirees.

SPEAKER_00 5:30

Aaron Powell It definitely does. So MGI starts with your standard adjusted gross income, your AGI.

SPEAKER_01 5:36

Okay.

SPEAKER_00 5:36

That includes the usual suspects you'd fully expect to be taxed on, right? Yeah. Like wages, uh taxable distributions from a traditional IRA or 401k, capital gains, rental income, and you know the taxable portion of your Social Security benefits.

SPEAKER_01 5:50

Aaron Powell Okay. All of that makes logical sense. But here's where I need to push back a little, because mistake number three in the text highlights strategy four, which is municipal bond interest.

SPEAKER_00 6:00

Yeah, the muni bond trap.

SPEAKER_01 6:01

Wait a second. You're telling me I could pay zero federal income tax completely illegally and still get hit with a twelve thousand dollar Medicare penalty. Yeah. How is that even mathematically possible? For decades, investors are told municipal bonds are the holy grail of tax-free income. Why is the government suddenly punishing you for holding them when it comes to Medicare?

SPEAKER_00 6:22

If we connect this to the bigger picture, we have to look at the underlying intent of the policy. The government is trying to means test Medicare. They're aggressively trying to identify who has a high uh capacity to pay so those people can help subsidize the program.

SPEAKER_01 6:39

I see.

SPEAKER_00 6:40

So while Congress agreed a long time ago not to tax municipal bond interest on your standard 1040 income tax return, you know, to encourage local infrastructure investment, CMS takes a completely different view for Medicare.

SPEAKER_01 6:53

Oh wow.

SPEAKER_00 6:54

For the purposes of IRMA, they explicitly add that tax exempt interest right back into your MGI calculation.

SPEAKER_01 7:00

Do they give you a pass on your tax return, but they ambush you at the pharmacy counter?

SPEAKER_00 7:03

Trevor Burrus That is the perfect way to describe it. I mean, you could execute flawless income tax planning. You could legitimately owe the IRS zero dollars because your entire income stream is generated by municipal bonds.

SPEAKER_01 7:14

Right, doing everything by the book.

SPEAKER_00 7:16

But if that tax-free interest pushes your MAGI over that$212,000 cliff for a couple, you trigger the massive surcharges. It completely blindsides people who thought they were being incredibly conservative and tax efficient.

SPEAKER_01 7:30

That is the literal definition of a hidden tax. So if high earners are traditionally using muni bonds for safe, tax-efficient income, but it's secretly blowing up their Medicare premiums. What are the actual alternatives here?

SPEAKER_00 7:44

Aaron Powell Well, you have to run a comparative analysis to see if the tax-free benefit of the muni bond actually outweighs the IMAA penalty costs.

SPEAKER_01 7:51

And does it?

SPEAKER_00 7:51

Frequently it doesn't. So in those cases, the source outlines pivoting to alternatives like tax managed equity funds.

SPEAKER_01 7:58

Okay. How do those help?

SPEAKER_00 7:59

These are funds structured with very low turnover, so they aren't throwing off taxable capital gains every year that would spike your MHGI. You control when you sell, which means you control when the income hits your tax return.

SPEAKER_01 8:10

Oh, smart. Now, the text also mentions cash value life insurance as a strategy here. But uh, how does that actually bypass the calculation? I mean, income is income, right?

SPEAKER_00 8:20

Not to the IRS. Really?

SPEAKER_01 8:21

Yeah. When you utilize cash value life insurance for retirement income, you aren't technically making a withdrawal. You're actually taking a loan against the death benefit of the policy.

SPEAKER_00 8:33

Ah, a loan.

SPEAKER_01 8:34

Right. And under Cruit tax code, a loan is not classified as taxable income.

SPEAKER_00 8:38

So it's invisible.

SPEAKER_01 8:40

Exactly. Because it isn't taxable income, it never appears on your 1040, and therefore it never feeds into your NGI. You can generate substantial cash flow without ever ticking the IRMAA needle.

SPEAKER_00 8:51

Okay, so now we know the mechanics of what counts against you, right? The wages, the force IRA withdrawals, and those sneaky municipal bonds. So if we know what hurts us, how do we actually take control of this MBI number before that two-year look back catches up with us?

SPEAKER_01 9:06

This brings us to what the text calls the critical window, which is basically ages 61 to 63.

SPEAKER_00 9:12

Aaron Powell Right, because your income at 63 directly determines your first year Medicare premiums at 65.

SPEAKER_01 9:17

Exactly. Those are your foundation building years. And the most prominent proactive strategy during this window involves Roth conversions. Strategy one. You know, the way I visualize a Roth conversion strategy, and tell me if this makes sense. It's like organizing a heavily packed closet before a move.

SPEAKER_00 9:33

Okay, I like where this is going.

SPEAKER_01 9:35

If you wait until moving day and try to shove every single box into the new closet at the exact same time, you're gonna break the door right off the hinges. It's a disaster.

SPEAKER_00 9:44

Total disaster, yeah.

SPEAKER_01 9:45

But if you systematically move things over year by year, sliding a few boxes over at a time and filling up the available space perfectly, the door closes just fine.

SPEAKER_00 9:54

That analogy perfectly illustrates mistake number two in our text, which is doing a massive Roth conversion all at once at age 63.

SPEAKER_01 10:02

Right, shoving all the boxes in at once.

SPEAKER_00 10:04

Exactly. If you decide to convert a million dollar traditional IRA to a Roth in one year, every single dollar of that conversion counts as ordinary income.

SPEAKER_01 10:13

Oh boy.

SPEAKER_00 10:14

You create a massive artificial income spike right inside your two-year look back window. So yes, the money will grow tax-free forever after that, but you've just guaranteed that you will pay the absolute maximum IRMAA surcharges for your first years on Medicare. You broke the door off the hinges.

SPEAKER_01 10:31

So the systematic approach, strategy two, income timing, is about filling up the tax brackets in your late 50s.

SPEAKER_00 10:37

Yes. You take the tax hit early and deliberately. You convert smaller chunks of that traditional IRA to a Roth IRA year by year. By the time you hit that critical window at age 61, your traditional IRA balance is significantly smaller.

SPEAKER_01 10:52

Which means your future forced withdrawals will be smaller.

SPEAKER_00 10:55

Precisely. Meanwhile, you've built this massive bucket of Roth money that you can pull from tax-free, and most importantly, it is completely invisible to the IRMAA calculation.

SPEAKER_01 11:05

That makes total sense for the investment side. But uh the text also details a powerful tool for health care costs specifically. And this one also has a pretty strict expiration date. Strategy six health savings accounts or HSAs.

SPEAKER_00 11:19

The health savings account is arguably the single most efficient investment vehicle in the entire U.S. tax code.

SPEAKER_01 11:24

Wow, really? The single most efficient?

SPEAKER_00 11:27

I'd argue yes. But the catch is that you cannot contribute to it once you are enrolled in Medicare. You have to build it in that pre-Medicare golden window. If you're enrolled in a high deductible health plan, a family can contribute up to$8,550 in 2025, plus an extra thousand dollar catch-up contribution if you're 55 or older.

SPEAKER_01 11:47

The text mentions a triple tax advantage here. Break down the mechanics of how that practically helps us avoid IRMAA.

SPEAKER_00 11:55

Sure. So first, the money goes in pre-tax, meaning it immediately lowers your adjusted gross income in the year you contribute.

SPEAKER_01 12:02

Love that.

SPEAKER_00 12:02

Second, the funds can be invested in the market and grow completely tax-free.

SPEAKER_01 12:06

Even better.

SPEAKER_00 12:07

Third, when you withdraw the money to pay for qualified medical expenses, it comes out tax free. And here is the vital mechanism for our discussion. Because the withdrawal is for a qualified medical expense, it doesn't touch your tax return at all, meaning it completely bypasses the MGI calculation.

SPEAKER_01 12:24

Wait, Medicare premiums are considered a qualified medical expense, right?

SPEAKER_00 12:28

Yes, they are.

SPEAKER_01 12:29

So I can literally build a tax-free bucket of money, let it compound for a decade, and then use that exact bucket to pay the Medicare premiums the government is trying to surcharge me on. And using that bucket doesn't trigger the surcharge.

SPEAKER_00 12:42

It is brilliantly efficient. Many high net worth individuals will actually pay their minor medical expenses out of pocket during their working years, just leaving the HSA untouched so it can compound in the market.

SPEAKER_01 12:54

Yeah, they just save the receipts.

SPEAKER_00 12:56

Exactly. They keep the receipts, and then in retirement, they reimburse themselves tax-free from the HSA to cover those Medicare premiums.

SPEAKER_01 13:04

Man, that is so smart. Now, these multi-year strategies, you know, the systematic Roth conversions, the aggressive HSA compounding these are fantastic if you have a five to 10 year runway.

SPEAKER_00 13:16

Right. If you have time.

SPEAKER_01 13:17

Here's where it gets really interesting, though. What happens if you are already at the finish line? Say you just retired, you're 65, your income just fell off a cliff because you stopped earning a salary. Okay. But the government is looking at your tax return from when you were 63, which uh was your absolute peak earning year. Are you just doomed to pay maximum surcharges for two years while the IRS bureaucracy catches up?

SPEAKER_00 13:40

This scenario causes an immense amount of unnecessary panic, but there's actually a specific reactive strategy for this. It's strategy five in the text, the life-changing event appeal.

SPEAKER_01 13:51

The life-changing event, I have to ask about the definition of life-changing here. Does simply deciding to retire actually count as a life-changing event to the federal government, or do you have to experience a true disaster?

SPEAKER_00 14:04

Aaron Powell It's a common misconception that this is some sort of hardship test. It's not.

SPEAKER_01 14:08

Oh, really?

SPEAKER_00 14:08

Right. It's an income projection test. The Social Security Administration explicitly lists work stoppage or a reduction in work hours as a qualifying life-changing event.

SPEAKER_01 14:19

Oh, wow. Okay.

SPEAKER_00 14:20

They also include marriage, divorce, death of a spouse, loss of a pension, or loss of income-producing property due to a natural disaster. If any of those specific events happen and your income drops significantly as a result, you do not have to wait two years for the system to catch up.

SPEAKER_01 14:36

So I just pull an emergency break and tell them to stop the surcharge.

SPEAKER_00 14:39

Well, let's change that analogy. Because an emergency break implies a mechanical guarantee. You are essentially auditing the auditor here. Which brings us to mistake number four. The SSA will not automatically fix your premiums.

SPEAKER_01 14:53

Because they don't know you retired.

SPEAKER_00 14:55

Exactly. They just see the high income tax return from two years ago.

SPEAKER_01 14:59

So the burden of proof is entirely on me.

SPEAKER_00 15:01

Yes. You must proactively file form SSA 44. You have to raise your hand, provide the documentation of your retirement like a letter from your employer or proof of a sold business, and request the reassessment using your current lower estimated income. If you don't, if you don't fight the bureaucratic inertia and file that form, you will pay the surcharge.

SPEAKER_01 15:21

That is incredible to know. Okay, now what about the older listener? Let's talk about the person who is already in their 70s. The villain in their IRMA story is almost always the required minimum distribution, right? The RMD.

SPEAKER_00 15:34

Oh, absolutely.

SPEAKER_01 15:35

You hit 73, the government forces you to pull money out of your massive traditional IRA, that money gets stacked on top of your social security, your MAGI spikes, and you get pushed over the cliff.

SPEAKER_00 15:44

That is the classic unavoidable trap for successful savers. But if you're charitably inclined, strategy three outlines the perfect workaround, which is qualified charitable distributions or QCDs.

SPEAKER_01 15:56

QCDs, okay.

SPEAKER_00 15:58

Once you are 70 and a half, the IRS allows you to transfer funds directly from your IRA to a qualified charity. And for 2024, that's up to$105,000.

SPEAKER_01 16:09

Wait, if I have to take an RD anyway, why not just take the cash, put it in my checking account, write a check to the charity myself, and claim the tax deduction? I still get the deduction, so it washes out, right?

SPEAKER_00 16:20

Not quite. And here's why the mechanics matter so much.

SPEAKER_01 16:23

Okay, tell me.

SPEAKER_00 16:24

If you take the cash yourself, that money is added to your adjusted gross income. Right. Yes, you can claim an itemized charitable deduction later, which will lower your overall taxable income. But IRMAA doesn't care about your taxable income after deductions. Oh. IRMA is based on your MAGI, which is calculated before itemized deductions are applied.

SPEAKER_01 16:44

Oh wow. So taking the cash spikes an MAGI, triggers the Medicare cliff, and the charitable deduction doesn't save you from the penalty at all.

SPEAKER_00 16:51

Precisely why the QCD is so vital. With a QCD, the money moves directly from the IRA to the charity. It never touches your personal checking account, which means it is completely excluded from your adjusted gross income.

SPEAKER_01 17:04

It's invisible again.

SPEAKER_00 17:06

Exactly. It satisfies the government's requirement that you draw down the IRA, but because it bypasses AGI entirely, it artificially suppresses your MAGI, potentially dropping you into a lower IRMAA tier.

SPEAKER_01 17:19

That's brilliant.

SPEAKER_00 17:21

This raises an important question. Are you letting your required distributions dictate your tax bracket, or are you telling your distributions where to go?

SPEAKER_01 17:29

I love that framing. Are you telling your distributions where to go? You're basically taking a forced bureaucratic tax event and turning it into a lever to control your own healthcare costs.

SPEAKER_00 17:38

Absolutely.

SPEAKER_01 17:39

And, you know, looking at all these pieces, the QCDs, the HSAs, the life insurance loans, the Roth conversions, it really highlights the ultimate conclusion of this Davies guide, which is why holistic planning matters so much.

SPEAKER_00 17:50

You absolutely cannot look at any of this in a vacuum. Mistake number five in the guide is planning in isolation. You can't have a tax professional who only focuses on minimizing your April 15th tax bill, and then an investment manager who only chases market returns while you try to figure out Medicare on an island.

SPEAKER_01 18:08

Aaron Powell Because pulling a lever in one area drops a trapdoor in another.

SPEAKER_00 18:11

Exactly.

SPEAKER_01 18:12

Like, for example, deciding to delay Social Security until age 70 to maximize your monthly check. On paper, it's a great strategy. But if you do that and suddenly you have a massive Social Security benefit stacking on top of your forced IRA distributions at age 73, you've just engineered an enormous income spike late in life. You could easily lock yourself into maximum IRMAA surcharges for the rest of your retirement.

SPEAKER_00 18:38

And let's look at the sheer magnitude of what that isolated planning actually costs you. The source spells it out clearly. Over a 20-year retirement, if a married couple sustains those higher IRMA tiers because they didn't coordinate their income, those surcharges can easily total over$125,000.

SPEAKER_01 18:56

$125,000 in stealth taxes, just directly cannibalizing the wealth you spent 40 years building.

SPEAKER_00 19:03

And remember, that is post-tax money.

SPEAKER_01 19:05

Oh, right.

SPEAKER_00 19:06

You had to earn significantly more than$125,000 just to clear the taxes, to pay that$125,000 penalty.

SPEAKER_01 19:15

Man, that hurts to think about.

SPEAKER_00 19:16

It does. And this challenges a fundamental assumption that a lot of diligent savers have. We've been trained our whole lives to prioritize saving a dollar in taxes today, assuming we'll be in a lower bracket tomorrow. But ask yourself, are your current tax-free or tax-deferred investment strategies actually setting a trap that will cost you$2 in mandatory healthcare premiums tomorrow?

SPEAKER_01 19:39

That is the exact mindset shift required.

SPEAKER_00 19:42

True wealth preservation isn't just about what you keep from the IRS, it's about what you keep from the system as a whole.

SPEAKER_01 19:48

You want your retirement plan engineered with precision, but IRMAA operates in the shadows. It punishes you for holding tax-free municipal bonds, it operates on a two-year delay, and it triggers massive financial cliffs based on a single dollar of income. You just cannot afford to be passive.

SPEAKER_00 20:06

And I want to leave you with one final provocative thought to ponder, looking beyond just today's numbers.

SPEAKER_01 20:11

Let's hear it.

SPEAKER_00 20:12

We tend to treat these IRMAA thresholds as fixed rules of physics, but they are political levers. As the Medicare Trust Fund faces increasing pressure and potential insolvency in the coming decade, what is politically easier? Raising baseline taxes on every single working American, or quietly lowering these IRM and A thresholds so that more and more quote unquote high earners fall over the cliff into the penalty tiers.

SPEAKER_01 20:39

Oh, wow. That is a chilling thought. It's so much easier to just move the goalposts on the high earners.

SPEAKER_00 20:44

Exactly.

SPEAKER_01 20:44

So if they move the goalposts tomorrow, does your plan survive? Check your Magi projections. Look closely at your 63 year old self if you aren't there yet, and map out your RMD schedule if you are. Don't let a hidden surcharge break the financial fortress you spent decades building. Thank you for joining us on this deep dive. We'll see you next time.