Understanding the Consequences of Our Wireless World: A Japanese Condominium Study

What if the constant exposure to electromagnetic radiation from our cell phones, Wi-Fi routers, and smart appliances is causing serious harm to our health? Join us as we explore a groundbreaking study conducted by Japanese physician Tetsuharu Shinjyo, which documented the health of 122 individuals living in a condominium with cell phone antennas on the roof. Discover the incredible improvements in the residents' health after the antennas were removed, and the staggering implications this study holds for our understanding of electromagnetic pollution.

The episode delves into the controversial stance taken by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications in Japan, which does not recognize any non-thermal effects for non-ionizing radiation. We discuss the increasing prevalence of Wi-Fi routers, smart appliances, and smartphones, considering the potential dangers associated with our constant exposure to RF radiation. Don't miss this essential discussion on the importance of educating ourselves and our loved ones about the potential harm caused by electromagnetic pollution.

Original Scientific Publication:  https://mdsafetech.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/shinjyo-t-and-shinjyo-a.-2014-significant-decrease-of-clinical-symptoms-after-mobile-phone-base-station-removal-e28093an-intervention-study.-.pdf

Transcript

Speaker 1: 0:00

Something happened back in 2009 and it might never happen again. We need to talk about how this situation that was carefully documented by medical personnel revealed just a wonderful insight into how much harm, and the diversity of harm, is being caused in the modern world by exposure to harmful man-made electromagnetic radiation. We're going to talk about it coming up.

Speaker 2: 0:52

EMF Remedy is dedicated to helping you understand which electromagnetic threats are present in your home and whether, in the context of your current home, when you're considering for purchase or building a new home with comprehensive protection designed in, emf Remedy can help you reduce your family's exposure to harmful man-made electromagnetic radiation.

Speaker 1: 1:16

Hi, this is Keith Cutter with EMF Remedycom. You're listening to Reversing Electromagnetic Poisoning, a podcast for people who are serious about taking control of the non-native radiation in their home. I talked about this somewhere in the past and I just couldn't put a finger on it. I keep thinking about this situation over and over again and I think it is so valuable for pointing to the solution to all of this and possibly for helping with loved ones who don't share your understanding and insight into the harmful nature of electromagnetic radiation man-made. I just want to review this again and I want to make it a standalone podcast here so we can refer to it in the future. You can take a listen to this and understand how such diverse medical conditions can be associated with RF, in this case, radio frequency radiation. We need to talk about why we may never again see results like this and we will at the end, but first let's dive in and get an idea of what we're talking about. I want to make sure people know that this is something they can look up themselves. They can research from their own. I'm going to be reading from the book The Invisible Rainbow by Arthur Furstenberg. In particular, this situation is documented in chapter 17, which is called In the Land of the Blind. But more than that, this is also documented in a scientific paper. I will put a link in the description where you can find that original scientific publication. The title of the publication, by the way, is Significant Decrease of Clinical Symptoms After Mobile Phone Base Station Removal and Intervention Study. The authors are in my apologies ahead of time because I'm afraid I'm not skilled in the Japanese language. So I mean no disrespect, i'll give it my best shot. Tetsuharu Shinjo and Akimi Shinjo. All right, so let me read to you what is written in Arthur Furstenberg's book, and it's just a gosh. One paragraph, a long paragraph.

Speaker 1: 4:20

In 2014, japanese physician Tetsuharu Shinjo published a before and after study that is a harbinger of the direction in which the world needs to go. He evaluated the health of the residence of an apartment building Actually, i think it was a condominium building, but anyway a building in which people were living Sorry, back to the text On whose roof cell phone antennas had been operating for a number of years. 122 individuals, representing 39 of the 47 apartments that's 83%, by the way were interviewed and examined Prior to the removal of the antennas. 21 people suffered from chronic fatigue, 14 from dizziness, vertigo or Meniere's disease, 14 from headaches, 17 from eye pain, dry eyes or repeated eye infections, 14 from insomnia, 10 from chronic nosebleeds. Five months after the antennas were removed, no one in the building had chronic fatigue, no one had nosebleeds anymore, no one had eye problems, only two people still had insomnia, one still had dizziness, one still had headaches. Cases of gastritis and glaucoma resolved. Like the residents of that building before the study, the majority of people in the world today do not know what their acute and chronic illnesses are, in large part caused STATE CARES by electromagnetic pollution. They don't talk to each other about their health problems and are unaware that they're shared by many of their neighbors.

Speaker 1: 6:39

Okay, so the scientific publication that I mentioned goes into quite a bit more detail on this. I'm not going to read through it. It's like 17 pages long, but it's easy reading and I would recommend it for anybody who wants to learn about such things. But what happened is the cell phone technology. The antennas whether you call them masks or towers or whatever you want to call them were placed on top of the building and in the scientific paper they go into a little bit more detail, stating that at the time this was written back in 2014.

Speaker 1: 7:24

The author says presently there is little concern about the possibility of adverse health effects from mobile phones and mobile phone base stations, and mentions that in Japan, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications does not recognize any non-thermal effects for non-ionizing radiation. Hey, does that sound familiar? I mean, is that not the greatest dodge in history, the strategy for kicking the can down the road, so to speak, with regard to any concern for health effects? Oh well, it doesn't heat, it doesn't harm. How amazing that you can use a slogan, essentially propaganda, to divert all reasonable curiosity about a topic. So the author further mentions that the possibility of adverse health effects is not accepted by that ministry when power densities are below a thousand microwatts not per square meter, like we're talking about normally in this podcast, but when power densities are below a thousand microwatts per square centimeter. That's a lot smaller. So I mean ridiculous. No official reports, possible adverse health effects not officially recognized in Japan, seldom in the Japanese print and broadcast media, and the author notes a reason for this could be the mobile phone company's media sponsorship. Do you think so?

Speaker 1: 9:14

Anyway, in January 2009, medical examinations were and interviews were done while the Bay Station was fully operational And then a second set. By the way, these these examinations were done by a physician and a nurse, each having more than 20 years of clinical experience. So anyway, it goes on and it talks about exactly the numbers that I mentioned before, and there's much more than what's mentioned in First and Berg's book. But here's the point People had no idea that there might be harm being caused by the RF radiation. Let me see if I can find in this report the scientific report where it says let's see, the residents had no prior knowledge about possible adverse health effects of RFEMF. That is such an important point. This is not just going to people who think there may be a problem. And can you validate my concern? These people didn't know that there might possibly be any connection between their exposure to RF radiation and then actually removing that source. So what a wonderful little situation this is. People were living in a condominium.

Speaker 1: 10:57

We have the exposure to RF radiation for a very long time. What was it? 11 years And then that's not wonderful. I mean, i can only imagine the agony, possible Lives lost, the suffering that happened during that course of time. The residents who had to leave because of their health, maybe lost their job maybe lost. Everything like happened with me and my exposure to RF radiation in my job no less. But I digress. Anyway, that's not the wonderful part.

Speaker 1: 11:35

The wonderful part is that a cell phone facility was taken out of operation and in that day and in that time, you see, there weren't that many sources of RF radiation in the world. We had cell phones, but they were not owned by the majority of people. That didn't really. That transition didn't begin until well, it was the first iPhone that was introduced by Apple. I think that really fueled the growth of so-called smart meaning radiation emitting phones that had enhanced convenience, amusement and stimulation built in, as well as the social media companies that have offerings designed to increase personal exposure by increasing time spent on the devices. That all really started, i would say, in January of 2007.

Speaker 1: 12:49

So now we're clearly in epoch in history where almost everybody has a smartphone And if you think about it, what an incredibly dangerous thing I mean. Forget that most people enjoy their smartphone. For most people, it's the most important thing in their whole life. If they get in the car to drive to work and they realize 10 minutes out that they forgot their smartphone, they'll turn back to go get it rather than saying, well, it's okay, i'll go through the day without it. Anyway, putting aside all of that, all the convenience, amusement, all the stimulation that it gives to people, what folly to have anything in a small population, nevermind the entire world, that we suddenly go to a point where everyone has this And I'm talking about epidemiology, right, how do we establish a contrast? How do we hope to have a control group if everyone has a smartphone? Ridiculous, just ridiculous. Anyway, my point here is that it was a different world when this cellphone tower was taken out of service And what a difference it made in the health of the residents of the condominium. What a huge difference it made And those results I shared with you. From what I read in Firstenberg's book, you can see a bit more detail in the scientific publication, the reason I think it's likely that we won't see something as dramatic in the future. Well, i'll tell you what let's do it this way.

Speaker 1: 14:59

Let me ask you some questions. When is the last time you heard about a cellphone tower or a mast being taken out of service? When is the last time you heard about that happening? And is it in the midst of a metropolitan area where there's 110 other cell phone towers surrounding, or is it in an area where one tower being taken out means no more service for a chunk of the population? Have you heard of such a thing? I mean, if it did and I'm just unaware was an objective health study documented? I mean, did a passionate doctor and nurse go in and interview and examine the people before and then after the removal and carefully document the changes in health for those people? Was such a thing shared by the media? So let me give you a piece of information here.

Speaker 1: 16:19

I don't know how many people are aware of this, but cell phone stand-alone cell phone towers have backup generators. I'm talking about the larger towers, not the little ones being deployed, the small cells, necessarily, but there's big backup generators to make sure that there is no gap in service. If the entire grid goes down because of a thunderstorm or windstorm or something like that, the cell towers just keep right ongoing. It's seamless for people who are using it because it goes from operating on grid power to operating on batteries and then generators kick on to charge those batteries for, it's my understanding, a number of days. So the reason I bring this up is that, oh my goodness, i feel so much better experience we would all otherwise understand with power outages. It's been taken away from us, right? If you live in an area where your cell towers have backup generators and I would argue that's probably most of us we won't have. That contrast is the way I've spoken about it in the past That, oh my goodness, i feel so much better experience. By the way, in times not too distant past, people would regularly report that, oh my goodness, i feel so much better when the world just had the big three the magnetic fields, the electric fields and the dirty electricity. And when the power goes out in an area, as I say, based on a windstorm or a thunderstorm or some kind of natural situation, you'll hear people talking about oh, i felt so great, i slept wonderfully, whatever. So my point is I don't think we're going to be able to experience in that in the future to the extent that these people experienced a huge contrast in 2009.

Speaker 1: 18:42

In the recent past 2009, when cell phone antennas were removed, there were fewer sources of RF in the environment close to people.

Speaker 1: 18:53

So if you haven't already heard the podcast on the good news and the bad news of the inverse square law, i'll just say in passing, and maybe you would like to look into those two episodes.

Speaker 1: 19:09

But the really big deal about exposures to harmful man-made electromagnetic radiation is that proximity matters a really large amount. In other words, your Wi-Fi router can be giving you more RF radiation than a cell phone tower just down the boulevard. So the way that enters in here is, if you have filled your condominium with Wi-Fi routers, smart appliances and you've got a smart phone and a smart watch on your person, maybe you wouldn't notice at all when a cell phone installation on the roof of your building was stopped, because you have elected, either by ignorance or by choice, to really concentrate your personal exposure to radio frequency radiation. So again, my point is we may not have the opportunity for that clear contrast. And you say well, keith, if the tower went off, the cell phone facility went off on top of the roof, then my smartphone would stop radiating me. No, that's not correct. In fact, for a while you would be radiated much more Well how?

Speaker 2: 20:47

does that?

Speaker 1: 20:47

work. When your so-called smartphone senses that it doesn't have a connection to a tower any longer, it begins broadcasting at increasingly higher levels of RF radiation, trying desperately to find another tower. And if you were blessed to live in an area where there was not another tower nearby, then it's going to go higher and higher until it reaches its maximum power output. Now, unfortunately, that's close to you, so from an RF exposure standpoint, you're going to have continuous high-intensity exposure to RF radiation, if and when your local tower should ever go down. For the younger crowd, it bears mentioning that. What was different in 2009,? I mentioned that the smartphone. People will argue about blackberries and whatever, but I don't think the current incarnation of a smartphone. That really began until the iPhone introduction in January of 2007. And in January of 2007, there were no smart appliances. When you went to this door to buy a washer or a dryer or a range or an oven or a dishwasher, you could be pretty well certain that it wasn't going to be spewing RF radiation into your home. Now, not so much the case. You might want to check out our recent podcast on smart appliances and dealing with those. And back in 2009, there was much less Wi-Fi proliferation, so that's why we have this wonderful contrast And these wonderful researchers who understood what was likely to happen, even though the residents had no idea that their health effects might be correlated with their exposure to RF. And we were able to see the results that we saw in this study, going from, as I mentioned earlier, 21 people with chronic fatigue, 14 dizziness, vertigo or Meniere's disease, 14 from headaches, 17 from eye pain, dry eyes, repeated eye infections, 14 from insomnia, 10 from chronic nosebleeds, and then, five months later, no one had chronic fatigue. Well, going from 21 people to zero, that's pretty startling. No one had nosebleeds anymore, no one had eye problems, only two still had insomnia, one still had dizziness. And, wow, 14 down to one on the dizziness And then one still having headaches. And then the odd comments here about gastritis and glaucoma. Wow, would we not think of those as very separate conditions and to imagine that they had potentially a common root? Amazing. So I don't think in the future we're going to see such a clear distinction. Because of the smart appliance initiative, because so many people have smartphones, they will continue to radiate, looking for that lost cell phone, a cell tower signal. People are putting RF emators actually on and in their bodies with not only the smartphone on their body, a smart watch on their body or a Fitbit type of a fitness tracking device on their body, hearing aids or wireless earbuds in their ear canals.

Speaker 1: 25:34

Going back to that observation about the close sources of radiation are the most meaningful in terms of the intensity of exposure to you as an individual. The things close by have a disproportionate effect. Alright, so I'm going to go ahead and we're going to move towards the end of our podcast today, but, as I said when we got started with this I know I mentioned this situation in Japan once before. It is so significant, though, because there was a paper written, there were people who were proactive, there was a population who didn't understand the correlation And, most importantly, there was a cell phone facility taken out of service in a time when that was the big RF exposure. Alright, i hope this has been helpful.

Speaker 1: 26:41

Perhaps, if you have a loved one who does not understand the correlation between harmful man-made electromagnetic radiation and health effects, maybe this would be a good first step in their journey. I would recommend, if people are interested in pursuing that further. There are some excellent books out there. I'm thinking of Overpowered, going Somewhere, wifi, refugee, cross Currents or the Body Electric, not to mention the Invisible Rainbow, as good books For looking at scientific research. I can't think of anything better than the Bioinitiative Report and the summaries by I believe his first name is Henry Lai. Those would be good places to continue.

Speaker 1: 27:47

Just for those of you who are electrically sensitive and as I said in the beginning, that just means you've been able to establish a correlation, by the way, by creating a contrast, by getting to a pristine place and all of a sudden your medical problems go away, or, conversely, going from a pristine environment to an EMF-rich environment and then observing illness. But those of you who are going through that transition and maybe you can't work anymore, maybe you've lost all your money and you can't afford to live where you were living I hope that today's podcast would be a help to you, just in reaffirming, helping you to really solidly understand. No, there are other people that are suffering from this. You won't see it in the news, of course, and it won't be promoted broadly, but don't let that dissuade you. Take action If you haven't already had an assessment and the development of a custom remediation plan for you and your particular living situation, boy, i just highly recommend that And no, i'm not talking about something I'm going to benefit from, because the majority of listeners to this podcast don't live anywhere near where I, as an EMF consultant, practice. And my encouragement as you already know from the episode on how to find a great EMF consultant in your area, my heart is with the sort of support your local farmer aspect. Find somebody who's qualified in your local area. Now don't misunderstand if that person doesn't exist or they're a charlatan, they don't, you know. If they're inappropriate to do the work, i'm not saying that you would work with them. Your option then would be you're going to need to acquire certain skills yourself. But anyway, i still recommend, as the greatest thing that you can do if you haven't done it already, is get a comprehensive EMF assessment done by a qualified individual in your home and follow through with the remediation plan. Otherwise, you know, certainly understand understanding the problem is a benefit, but without the follow through and actually reducing your exposures, not going to be any benefit there. So thanks very much for your time and your attention.

Speaker 1: 30:57

If you are getting benefit from these podcasts, we would be grateful if you would consider becoming a supporter. There's a link in the description. We have a new YouTube channel. As you may have suspected by now, i've intimated a bit here and there If you'd like to consume information in that way. It's been up for oh gosh, i don't know a month and a half maybe, and there's six or eight different items there that you can take a look at. So help yourself to that. It would be a great help if you would post a review either wherever you are accessing this podcast. Putting a review in there somehow helps other people find this resource, and I want to help as many people as I can with this information. So consider that and then pray for our success, that we would be a blessing to many who are suffering at this time from the reckless spread of harmful man-made electromagnetic radiation. Thanks for spending time with us. We'll look forward to seeing you next time.