159 Safe Today, Unlivable Tomorrow: How Terrain Shapes Long-Term EMF Survival

A practical, real-world case study on finding an EMF-resilient home in a world where long-term safety is shaped by terrain, fixed-wireless infrastructure, and future RF proliferation. We look at why a seemingly perfect country property ultimately failed—and what anyone seeking lower synthetic fields must understand about current and future inhabitability, outdoor living, and the wisdom of long-term planning.

Chapters

• 0:00 Case Study Setup And Stakes
• 3:44 Client Goals And Constraints
• 11:37 Millimeter Wave Surprise Indoors
• 18:12 Fixed Wireless And Wide RF Beams
• 23:05 Terrain As Long-Term Shield
• 26:35 Valley Risks And Box Canyon Ideal
• 30:15 Practical Next Steps And Tools

Transcript

Keith Cutter: 1:55

Welcome to the EMF Remedy Podcast. You know what? I don't know whether there's a higher calling than to help somebody who is sensitive and their life has been marked by that sensitivity and needs a safe place to live. I don't know if there is a higher calling than to try to help that person find the absolute best place possible. So today is a case study. It revolves around an evaluation that I did a few weeks ago for a longtime client looking for a permanent, you know, home where she can be safe in the long term. And I want to take you through that evaluation, some very interesting things about it, like millimeter wave radiation exposures inside the home, not in just one room, but in the adjacent room as well. Really unexpected finding. And how even though I could have addressed all of the EMF issues in that home, I didn't really recommend it. And it had to do with something we talked about way back in episode nine. And that's finding a place safe from radio frequency radiation. So safe today, unlivable tomorrow, how terrain shapes long-term EMF survival coming up. Hi, this is Keith Cutter, host of the EMF Remedy Podcast. It becomes even more so for those who have received the gift of electrical sensitivity or who simply wish to take a reasonable, a precautionary approach to personal or family exposures. Although the best solution is a purpose-built, genuinely EMF resilient structure situated on well protected land, most clients, including this one, want something suitable guess when. Right now. They want a home that is more or less move in ready, where both indoor and outdoor living can be enjoyed without ongoing synthetic field intrusion. Finding such a place is no small task in a time when the long assumed right of quiet enjoyment in one's dwelling has effectively vanished. I'm speaking these words in the shadow of two recent episodes that I recorded, the first with Andrew McAfee and the second one with Theodoros Corrado. So the first was trying to hold on to Greenbank, Radio Quiet Zone. And the other was this horrendous idea that even though we have no legal recourse in the courts right now with regard to actual proven harm to the environment or individuals and cell tower placement, we are battling now for any kind of local influence. So against that backdrop, where this is what where we are right now. So just weeks away from marketing my sorry, marking, celebrating the completion of my forty first year of living with rapidly escalating synthetic field exposures. I was first affected in nineteen eighty five. That's been a long run, my friends. It remains both a challenge and a privilege to help those who are struggling, knowing firsthand what is at stake. The equipment, the techniques, and the experience required for this work draw on all that I have learned and all that I can offer. In other words, my friends, nothing is more important than this. The house under consideration was in a beautiful subdivision where each property rested on a generous, I believe it was five acre lots. It sat in a sparsely populated country setting, check. It remained only ten minutes from the nearest small city, which is the largest in a county, spanning about one thousand eight hundred and fifty one square miles, if you don't include the vast lakes and home to fewer than sixty thousand people. Check, check. For someone unacquainted with EMF realities, it would appear ideal. But in the end, the client, wisely, in my view, decided to keep looking. And it is always the client's decision, not mine. And it wasn't because of choices under control of the homeowner. My discovery of millimeter wave RF exposure in two rooms was concerning, but I was confident the different internet arrangement could eliminate it. The severe magnetic magnetic field exposure at one of the kitchen prep areas was also solvable, I believe, and the unacceptable dirty electricity levels could be substantially reduced. So all of these were in principle correctable problems. Before explaining the true difficulty, it's worth noting how unusual millimeter wave exposure is in a rural home. I often wonder how many consultants are even equipped to measure it or would think to check for it in such a location. I'm not casting shade. I'm just wondering out loud. So I will refrain from naming the popular satellite-based internet provider involved, but I was grateful that its up and down link frequencies fell within the detention range of one of my meters, which was the millimeter wave meter from safe living frequency response between twenty and forty gigahertz. So that should narrow things down for you. The larger concern, however, was the county's fixed wireless internet infrastructure. So here we have an abundance of mountains all around us. Fixed internet service relies on directional antennas with integral transmitters powered by POE power over internet. Ethernet, sorry. Operating on either five gigahertz or sixty gigahertz. And those radio slash antenna units all in one, they're selectable. They will run on a post, talking to that distant router in the mountain at five gigahertz or sixty, it's configurable. It's essentially a Wi-Fi router mated to a directional antenna and aimed at a mountaintop Wi-Fi node. Because these links depend on line of sight propagation, the mountaintop transmitter effectively illuminates the entire service area. For the electrically sensitive, this means that every place within reach of that node might be difficult or even impossible to inhabit. And perhaps worse, nonsensitives receive no warning from their bodies at all. So they expose themselves. This is the world we live in now. The burden is compounded further by the close range emissions from the directional antennas mounted on each participating home. You know, I think people look at these antennas and they imagine they're they're magical. And because it's sort of shaped like a dish and it's got a little stinger, a little pointy thing in the middle. I think they imagine that there's like a laser thin beam of radiation that comes out and only touches the remote transmitter they're talking to. And by my testing, uh nothing can be further from the truth. There's certainly directionality, and by the way, side and rear lobes, of course. But um, it isn't like a beam of coherent light. It is the beam widens, I'll just say that. So the system level reality leads directly to the specific problem at the property. The issue isn't simply that neighboring homes sixty gigahertz emissions are undetectable with current EMF survey equipment. The deeper concern is that as time passes, nothing prevents future residents from adopting either the five or sixty gigahertz fixed wireless equipment with a direct bearing through the subject property or even through the home itself. Now my client loves her dogs who frequent the backyard, and the prospect of an unpredictable future RF path crossing her land or her dwelling and or the dwelling was simply unacceptable. And this brings us to the heart, my friends, of the matter for anyone who must take a proactive approach to exposure. Whether by necessity or by wisdom. It is all about the terrain. Something in there too about Bechamp and Louis Pasteur. That was all about the terrain, but a different kind, and I and I digress. Sorry about that. It is all with regard to avoiding terrestrial radio frequency radiation. It is all about the terrain. About making effective use of the natural contours of the earth to guard against present and future RF proliferation. And this is where the property ultimately failed, while unquestionably far better today than her current home. And that's a bit of an understatement. Its relationship to the surrounding landscape was backwards. Rather than using the terrain as a shield, the home was situated in a way that left it open to a range of present and future exposures. We're talking about a house in the bottom of a very broad valley encircled by mountains. Not a strategic place at all. The only long term reliable protection from terrestrial radio frequency radiation sources is the intelligent use of terrain. One effective example, if I could get you to imagine, is a narrow box canyon, provided the homeowner controls not only the canyon floor and walls, but also the portion of the canyon rim that might otherwise host future RF services with a direct bearing on the property. Without such control, long term resilience. Remains uncertain. So can you picture what I'm saying? Imagine a home in a small box canyon, and you own not only the little canyon, but the land just around the lip, so that nobody can put an antenna facing down into the canyon. Of course, you'll need to look at other issues like what's it going to take to access? And, you know, what are the flood conditions? Is it going to be safe from that perspective, or landslide, or whatever it may be? But I'm just saying from an RF perspective, that's like the perfect picture, my friends. So for this client's needs, that uncertainty was simply too great in terms of both current and future inhabitability. The beautiful mountains encircling the valley, part of what makes the property so visually appealing, also provide ideal sites for future mountaintop cell tower installations, or worse, turning today's seemingly reasonable exposures into untenable conditions over time. Likewise on the valley floor, even if no neighbors fixed internet dishes illuminate the home today, the future remains uncertain. And even if the house itself could be shielded, outdoor living for dogs and people alike could become impossible. My advice is simple don't spend another day without knowing your in-home exposure levels. If relocation becomes necessary, think long term. If you can't afford a box canyon with control over surrounding land and who can, then with the help of a trusted guide, carefully consider only those properties that minimize future exposures or pursue the design and construction of an EMF resilient home in an area that you can afford that will at least in some large part because of terrain minimize the potential challenges of the future. If none of this is within reach, consider a specially designed, trailer mounted, resilient tiny house and move as needed. Staying ahead of the burn as best you can. Proverbs twenty two, three The prudent sees danger and hides himself, but the simple go on and suffer for it. If you do not yet have a safe and sound millimeter wave meter, I'm gonna encourage you to consider getting one for your kit. No, it won't give you a complete look into the radio frequency spectrum. It is so vast you can barely imagine it, and we can only see a part of it, but for so long, having something that went up to as high as three gigahertz would show you ninety-nine percent of all the RF, or I don't know what the number is. Some huge portion because the really common bits were all on the ISM bands instrumentation, medical, and science bands. Those are the unlicensed portions where Wi-Fi and Bluetooth and microwave ovens, weather uh wireless weather stations, a number of other things lay. And then you add in the cell phone towers and whatnot. All of that up to about three gigahertz was pretty much everything you had to worry about. But we're getting crazy with what we're doing. We're getting into the millimeter wave stuff, which kind of begins around 20 to 40 gigahertz. Now we have a nice meter for that. But we got a big blank spot between 10 and 20. Safe Living is ostensibly working on that, but not fast enough for my likes. But even if we had all of that, everything on my Christmas list, we would still have emissions above 40 gigahertz, which are increasing. This is a mad, mad world we live in. But we can do the best that we can. A trained eye and the ability to ask reasonable questions is going to get you far in terms of understanding what the exposures m might be. So find a trusted guide, get help, give help if you are if you are doing this for a living in a way that uh is God honoring, I'll just say it that way. Consider the safe and sound millimeter wave meter. I don't think you need the expensive horn. I found these exposures, which by the way, were, if I remember correctly, more than 400 microwatts per square meter. Can you believe that? In a house. Coming from this uh satellite internet system that they had. So um, yeah, consider getting one of those if you don't already have it. I am not one of these guys that is trying to sell you something um almost ever, certainly not often, and I'm not trying to sell you one of these, but if you do decide to get one, I do make a portion of my living through affiliate uh relationships. So if you want to use my discount code, which is REMEDY RE-M-E-D-Y-5, you should get a 5% discount. I will get a small something from Safe Living Technology. And if because they're prone to do this, once you become a customer of theirs, when they have sales, they'll give you uh a discount that's much greater than 5%. And I understand, yeah, take that, do it. Um, even if it means letting me, you know, out of the loop. But if if you've learned about it from me or I've inspired you to get one, here's what's fair. Uh I've agreed with uh Safe Living. Go ahead and get whatever discount they're offering, but let me know what you purchased from them, and then I can I can speak to them directly, and they will honor the fact that you learned about the product from me. So I might get some little compensation from that. All right, I hope that this has been helpful. Thank you for letting me be your trusted guide today. Join me as I pray that this episode may be a blessing to many. Keith Cutter, EMFremedy.com. See you next time.

Announcement: 31:47

The EMF Remedy Podcast is a project of EMF Remedy LLC. We'd like to be your trusted guide for achieving a better EMF environment in your home. The contents on this podcast are provided for informational purposes only and are not intended to substitute for the advice provided by your doctor or other healthcare professional. It is not intended to be, nor does it constitute healthcare or medical advice. Opinions of guests on this podcast do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the EMF Remedy Podcast.