Bite-Sized Business Law
Looking for the latest in legal business news?
Get a breakdown of the top stories in business law from industry leaders on the front lines with Bite-Sized Business Law. Host Amy Martella takes a closer look at the latest corporate happenings through interviews with the attorneys, legal experts, public figures, and scholars behind the news to distill business law’s biggest stories into bite-sized portions.
This is your chance to go further into the world of business law and stay up to date with legal cases and industry trends.
Corporations impact us all, leading changes that extend far beyond business to shape the economy, public policy, technology, and beyond. Looking at the big picture, Amy discusses not only the underlying issues in business ethics and legal cases leading the biggest stories but also sparks thought-provoking discussions on where the law should be headed.
Amy is the Executive Director of the Corporate Law Center at Fordham University School of Law. Her background ranges from big law to government to tech startups, allowing her to offer an insider’s perspective of the issues that shape corporate actions, large and small. Covering crypto regulation to securities fraud, AI’s impact to Elon Musk’s pay package, Bite-Sized Business Law covers it all with guests of varying viewpoints to provide the nuanced analysis needed to tackle complex problems.
Whether you're looking for the latest in legal insight on intellectual property, mergers and acquisitions, business ethics or legal cases in the business law world, you’ll find it here. Enjoying a thoughtful perspective on the news stories of the moment, Bite-Sized Business Law examines big issues and delivers them in small doses.
Bite-Sized Business Law is a project by the Corporate Law Center at Fordham Law. The Center serves as a hub for scholars, professionals, policymakers, and students to engage in the study, discussion, and debate of current issues in corporate law. The Center focuses on aspects of corporate law, corporate compliance, antitrust law, and securities regulation. Through initiatives like the Mergers and Acquisitions seminar and the Securities Litigation and Arbitration Clinic, students actively engage in real-world research and cases, bridging the gap between classroom learning and practical application in the legal field.
Bite-Sized Business Law
A Tale of Two Cases: The Shared Stakes in Musk's Appeal and SB21
Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.
Today, the long-running legal battle over Elon Musk’s Tesla pay package reaches its final chapter. In this episode of Bite-Sized Business Law, Amy Martella is joined by Richard Squire, Professor of Business Law at Fordham and faculty director of the Corporate Law Center, to unpack two pivotal Delaware Supreme Court decisions: ‘Tornetta v. Musk’ and ‘Rutledge v. Clearway Energy Group LLC’. Together, these cases bring the Musk saga to a close while reshaping the broader landscape of Delaware corporate law. The conversation begins with the Chancery Court ruling in ‘Tornetta’ that struck down Musk’s multibillion-dollar pay package and the failed attempt to reinstate it through a second shareholder vote. Richard explains how on appeal, the Delaware Supreme Court took a narrower path, focusing on the remedy sought by plaintiffs rather than the breach of fiduciary duties, ultimately restoring the pay package while awarding only nominal damages. From there, the discussion turns to ‘Rutledge’ and the constitutional challenge to Delaware’s controversial SB21 legislation. The episode explores how the Court upheld the law, what it means for controlling shareholders, and how both decisions reflect the legal and political forces shaping Delaware’s role as the leading jurisdiction for corporate law. Listen in for a clear breakdown of these intertwined cases and what they mean for corporate governance going forward!
Key Points From This Episode:
- ‘Tornetta v. Musk’ and the final chapter of the Musk pay package saga.
- A breakdown of Musk’s Tesla pay package and its extreme performance targets.
- Why the Chancery Court struck down the package for fiduciary breaches.
- Explanation of rescission and what it means to rescind an agreement.
- The second shareholder vote and attempt to ratify the pay package.
- Why the Chancery Court rejected the second vote as ineffective.
- How the case reached the Delaware Supreme Court on appeal.
- The Court’s focus on the remedy sought by the plaintiff.
- Why rescission was deemed impossible after years of Musk’s work.
- Outcome: Musk keeps the pay package with only nominal damages awarded.
- How SB21 created safe harbors for controlling shareholders.
- ‘Rutledge v. Clearway Energy Group LLC’ and its challenge to SB21.
- Why the Supreme Court upheld SB21 as fully constitutional.
- How political and economic pressures shape Delaware’s decisions.
- Insights on SB21’s ambiguity and its broader impact on Delaware law.
- Reflections on the outcome and questions about fairness and shareholder benefit.
Links Mentioned in Today’s Episode:
Tornetta v. Musk (Supreme Court)
Tornetta v. Musk (Chancery Opinion II)
Tornetta v. Musk (Chancery Opinion I)