Destination Dawgs: Where Opportunity Meets Inclusion

When the University of Georgia (UGA) launched Destination Dawgs in January 2017, the vision was clear: create a fully inclusive program where students with intellectual disabilities could learn, grow, and thrive alongside their peers. What began as an idea from a 2014 exploratory grant has since become a nationally recognized program that places students at the heart of campus life.

Unlike some programs that offer separate classes, Destination Dawgs was built to be fully integrated. Staff explained that this was a very intentional choice: “Destination Dawgs is unique in that we do not offer any segregated or specialized classes that are just for IPSE [Inclusive Post Secondary-Education] students. We were intentional about not reinforcing beliefs that students with intellectual disabilities should be in separate classes.” Instead, students enroll in regular UGA courses, join clubs, cheer on the Bulldogs at game days in Athens, and take part in internships that help them prepare for meaningful careers. From the start, UGA students themselves supported this vision, even passing a Student Government resolution in 2015 to welcome peers with intellectual disabilities into the Bulldawg Nation.

The Georgia Council on Developmental Disabilities (GCDD) is driven by its Five Year Strategic Plan goals to improve services and supports for people with intellectual and other developmental disabilities (I/DD). The Council, charged with creating systems change for individuals with developmental disabilities and family members, will work through various advocacy and capacity building activities to build a more interdependent, self-sufficient, and integrated and included disability community across Georgia.

This project was supported, in part by grant number 2001GASCDD-03, from the U.S. Administration for Community Living, Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C. 20201. Grantees undertaking projects with government sponsorship are encouraged to express freely their findings and conclusions. Points of view or opinions do not, therefore, necessarily represent official ACL policy.