Anthropic had a really, really bad week. So, some context first. When Anthropic released its very popular fable mythos 5 models, they warned the world that they were too dangerous, hyped them for months, released it, got it pulled by the government, fought with the White House, and dragged its reputation with developers through the mud in the process. And its biggest competitor in OpenAI this past week, well, worked with the government to release its new GPT-5. Without months of trumpeting its own horn, it stole all the benchmarks back from Anthropic, and now Anthropic is having to enter the week with its tail between its legs. And what made matters even worse for Anthropic? Yes, OpenAI released even more with its new live voice mode and chat GPT for work, but Anthropic actually got two new serious competitors for its coding API business in Grok 4.5 in Meta's Muse Spark 1.1. Yep, it was one of those busy weeks in AI where positions at the top seemed to shift every day, and your head was probably left spinning trying to keep up. Don't worry, we'll get your head on straight as we unwrap it all on our weekly AI News That Matters segments. All right, welcome to Everyday AI. If you're new here, my name's Jordan, and well, we do this every day. It's your daily, unedited, unscripted live stream podcast and free daily newsletter helping business leaders like you and me not just keep up, but how we can make sense of all these happenings and use that information to get ahead to grow our company and our career. So it starts here, but please, if you haven't already, subscribe to the podcast uh on Apple or Spotify or wherever you're listening and make sure you go to our website at your everydayai.com. We're gonna highlight everything we talk about here as well as everything else that you may have missed today. All right, so y'all just don't don't pin, don't do this every day. I'm just saying that now because it's gonna start really heating up. Acceleration is accelerating. There's only gonna be new models quicker, new features quicker, new drama, new partnerships. Y'all, you have work to do, so just tune in on Mondays and well every day, and we'll keep you up to date. All right. Uh, first story, one that a lot of people didn't see coming. Well, Apple sued OpenAI on Friday, alleging that its consumer hardware team stole trade secrets through two former Apple employees. So Apple says OpenAI encouraged recruits to share confidential information and avoid scrutiny during hiring, according to reports. So its complaints named Tang Tan and uh Chang Luai. So OpenAI uh denies any wrongdoing, and it says the company focused on building its own technology rather than using Apple's secrets. So that leaves the two companies in a strange position. Apple still integrates ChatGPT with OpenAI, uh uh, and while OpenAI is also developing hardware that is likely going to compete at one point with Apple's core interface. So the filing also gave Elon Musk some fresh ammunition against Sam Altman, and Musk quickly turned Apple's allegations into another public attack on X. And for those not keeping score at home, two months earlier, Musk lost his open AI case uh against the company after a jury found that he filed too late and he has promised an appeal. So Musk took the opportunity to call Altman a scammer across several posts. And Altman, while I was grabbing my popcorn reading the uh replies, uh answered by suggesting Musk's renewed fixation showed that GBT-5 must be really good. Uh, neither man, though, is a party to Apple's case. Uh, their exchange, though, is in reaction to the foul filing, not evidence that uh Apple's allegations are true. Uh, the timing obviously adds another layer. Uh, Elon Musk's SpaceX debuted at a whopping and impressive 2.5 trillion valuation as they went public a couple of weeks ago. Well, open AI submitted its confidential IPO paperwork in June. So uh we'll see what happens with this lawsuit. It seems like it's not really anything to do with OpenAI as a company, but just the employees at OpenAI. And it could maybe impact OpenAI's hardware plans. Uh depends on what happens with this suit. And well, it puts also one of Apple's most uh powerful, at least so far, consumer partnerships under the spotlight. So obviously, um Apple's uh Siri moving forward is going to be powered in part by Google's Gemini models, but uh up until now it was powered by Chat GPT. So essentially, any uh query that you talked to the not so smart Siri uh over the past you know year and a half or so got routed to ChatGPT. Essentially, Apple said, Yeah, our Siri can't handle this. We're gonna partner with ChatGPT to give people the answers they need. So, yeah, it's one of those like awkward moments where it's like, wait, you guys are still kind of friends, but definitely enemies. And now this is uh at least the first time that we've seen a public lawsuit going from Apple against Open AI. And we have heard that they've uh open AI has hired quite a few talented uh engineers, not just on the hardware side, uh, from across Apple. All right, our next piece of AI news a big release for Apple, or sorry, that for OpenAI that makes Apple's hardware so much better. Uh my gosh, I probably played just and by played used. I probably used the new GPT live uh feature from OpenAI almost as much as I used the new GPT 5.6 soul model. So let's talk about OpenAI's new launch as they released GPT Live this past week as ChatGPT's new default voice model for paid plans. Uh, and I do think that they have some, although very limited, use for free plans as well. So previous voice conversations before this, well, they still felt kind of turn-based, right? It was walkie-talkie, and this was whether it was OpenAI's advanced voice model, Google's Gemini Live, and there's some others, but I would say those were the two leaders, but none were really good because essentially, you know, someone would speak, the model kind of waited, and then it answers. So GPT Live has this uh, you know, kind of dual mode, right? Where it can listen to you and speak at the same time, right? So it feels much more natural, and not only that, but it can actually query things in real time, which is something, right? When Gemini Live first came out, I was super excited that it had that capability, but it was always very delayed. Um, right, it couldn't do it live. So the cool thing about this new uh GPT live voice mode is you can say, like, hey, you know, what what's the biggest, you know, what's happening in my city this weekend? And instantly, you know, within like a second or two, it's gonna start talking, uh, right, about something that's factual. Whereas before, you know, with like Gemini Live as an example, it could do that, but it would take a good like four, five, 10 seconds, uh, right. And you didn't have this ability to have uh the conversation be too dual in tone, uh, right. It this this uh you know, full duplex mode, essentially, where you know you can be talking and it can interrupt you and it doesn't break the flow, and vice versa. So it's been a pretty impressive model so far. So essentially it allows the model to listen while also speaking, it can better handle interruptions, stay quiet while someone thinks, and decide when a tool is needed. But harder questions then move to the GPT-5.5 model in the background without ending the live conversation. So then the interface stays responsive while another model works. So OpenAI says more than 150 people use voice or dictation this uh each week. So this is not just a small audience, this is pretty big. Um, so right now uh it is the paid plans uh that uh have um access, although I believe like uh enterprise and edu counts uh don't have this just yet. And there should be video and screen sharing coming soon to go along with this live conversation mode. So, yeah, like I said, if you've tried the other kind of voice modes, right? So open AI had its standard voice mode, uh, open AI had its advanced voice mode, neither of those were very good. Although when advanced voice mode came out, it seemed better, but you know, for the most part, the you know, AI voice modes that came out in you know 24 and 25 were essentially just sounded more human and the latency was a little less, right? But it they couldn't call tools essentially, right? The thing that I did with this, I had a 60-page document, right? And so I just opened up my phone, I had the document saved in there. I did that, I had to do some driving, and I just talked with Chat GPT live voice for you know the 20 or so minutes that I was in the car and had a really good conversation. And that's something that none of the other voice modes have been able to do, is to consistently, you know, chat over a document, which is one of the big reasons why I always want to use voice mode, right? It's maybe one of the reasons I use the interactive join feature in Notebook LM's audio overview. So if you haven't used that, it's really good, but this is much better, right? Uh that one, it always kind of goes back to the same track, where obviously with GPT Live, right? Think uh the way I use it, I had this 60-page doc, and I'm like, hey, ask me questions, and you know, depending on my answer, you know, go and keep asking me more questions, and then I can go back and use the transcript. And it was actually super helpful. All right, our next piece of AI news. Yeah, we had a lot of releases this week, y'all. So Grok 4.5 from XAI is out. So Cursor and Space XAI. So, yes, it's called SpaceXAI. Uh, and cursor obviously is part of SpaceXAI, but they jointly trained and released Grok 4.5, giving the coding platform a model. It helped shape around its own workflow. So, cursor matters here because it owns the application and controls the model routing, and it doesn't need users to choose grok as a general chatbot. So, Anthropic has built substantial commercial momentum around coding and agentic work. So, this is part of that premium that a cheaper rival can attack. So, yeah, this is another part of the bad news for anthropic that grok 4.5 on a lot of benchmarks because you know, uh, on things like Sui Marathon, uh, there were some other, I think uh T3, um, uh there was uh terminal coding, a couple other benchmarks that Grok either tied Fable in or was actually better than Fable and Opus, obviously, as well. So it's pretty pretty interesting, right? It's not great on all benchmarks, Grok 4.5, but I think for cheap coding tasks, right? Or if your company is just coding software developments, right? I think you know, two years ago, it's like hands down, everyone's using Anthropic. Uh 18 to 12 months ago, right? Google came into the mix. Uh, and then over the past, you know, three to four months, we've seen open models now with you know open AI's uh five six um uh Luna. It's like that's a fantastic model, cost efficient. And now we have Grok 4.5 joining uh the foray. So the price comparison, yeah. So grok is two dollars per million input and six dollars per million output versus fable that is uh literally five times cheaper on the inputs and nearly 10 or sorry, five times more expensive. Uh so fable is five times more expensive than grok. Uh, and on the output side, it is nearly 10 times more expensive. So yeah, grok 4.5, $2 per million in, $6 per million out versus Fables, $10 per million in, $50 per million out. So SpaceX also reports four plus times fewer output tokens than Opus 4.8 on one test. So saying it's not only a lot cheaper, well, it's also just way more token efficient. So uh we'll see what happens here because one thing I've I've I've always said, I don't think the general public is really ever gonna use Grok. I don't think that. Um, will they use uh cursors, composer models? Maybe, but I do think that certain um types of organizations, certain people within certain departments will use groc's models, and I think maybe we'll see the first kind of mass uh enterprise adoption with Grok 4.5 just for this, for people who are just refactoring entired code bases, right? When you're talking about in those cases burning billions of tokens an hour, probably way more, right? That's when you have to start looking at like, hey, maybe our team should be off this, you know, this expensive model and be looking at something like maybe a Grok 4.5. All right, speaking of models and routing them to other places, this one's interesting. According to reports, Microsoft is now starting to use its own internal models, the Microsoft AI models, for some Excel and Outlook features, according to a Bloomberg report. So, uh, according to the report, for many employees, Copilot is not just one among several. It may be the only AI that their company can use. That's not according to reports, that's just in general, right? Because so many enterprises out there, if they just use Copilot, that's all that's approved, right? And luckily, uh, right, because Microsoft's own models aren't very good yet, they're getting better. Um, right, but the the reason I think Copilot has still been fairly uh decent to above average versus you know the dozens of other competitors out there as well, because they've been able to use the anthropic and open AI models, right? Powering Copilot. But now, yeah, according to reports, they're starting to try to save money and swap it out and use their own MAI models. So Microsoft can still switch the intelligence underneath the product. So most employees will never know whether it's an MAI, open AI, or whether it's anthropics that answered. So tens of thousands of Excel and Outlook prompts already are reportedly running through MAI each week, making this a production change rather than a future promise. So the likely architecture, though, is tiered. Microsoft can still use kind of this cheaper internal models for routine prompts and then reserve, you know, GPT-5. Quality is also the unresolved issue here. Uh, right. So one recent large government trial found that 44% of participants using other generated generative eye gen AI tools preferred them versus co-pilot. Yeah, Kat's got my tongue today, apparently. So essentially, here's what it means, right? Uh, I think Microsoft, we've seen reports that they're looking at potentially uh using Deep Seek models for some of their um co-pilot co-work. So it's not surprising necessarily that they're gonna start to use some of their own internal models. But I think ultimately what this is, which I've been talking about this now for a couple of months, it's kind of this this overhang, right? Like 90-ish percent of what these models, right? GPT 5.6, Claude Fable 5, 90 of their capabilities. Most people don't need it, right? Until our day-to-day work catches up with where the models are. A lot of what these more frontier models are, well, it's overkill, right? That's why even within the own systems, right? One thing I set up over the week is well, I set up a lot of fun things, by the way. Now I'm you know, using um, you know, using uh soul, uh 5.6 soul inside of codex. I'm using fable inside of or wait, I'm using, let me get this right, uh, right, using Claude Code and then pulling in uh GPT 5.6 soul and then vice versa inside codex, um, you know, using Fable 5. But I think this is also why now internally people are setting up skills using the same models within one company, right? Where it's hey, we're just gonna use Fable in Claude Code or in Claude Cowork as the planner, and then we're gonna use something like Sonnet 5 or something like that. So, even not just for people that are paying for the tokens via the API, but also people, you know, if you're on a $20 a month plan, you're gonna have to start using these things because as the models become more and more powerful, well, all that means is they're just using more tokens, they're calling more tools, they're becoming more agentic. So, you know, six, nine months ago, a $20 a month AI plan subscription felt great. So it's these two things happening at once. All these companies, you know, cutting costs, and they're saying, well, the token subsidy is over, and the fact that, well, agentic systems are using more tokens, and obviously those things go hand in foot. But uh it goes to tell you here that Microsoft, both looking at Deep Seek and their own internal models, but I think this is actually indicative of a bigger shift moving ahead. So, you know, if you're a Microsoft copilot organization, I wouldn't look at this in a bad way necessarily, because I'm sure they're doing it extremely meticulously and strategically. So ultimately, users don't notice, right? Because if all of a sudden people that don't already, right, the general consensus around copilot is it's not the best, right? A lot of people, you know, that at least I talk to at larger organizations, once they get approval for something like you know, Claude or OpenAI, they're usually happy because you know, uh Copilot, Microsoft Copilot, as good as it is, it's just the learning curve is outrageous just because of the permissions and the security, right? It's so hard where things like you know, Claude and um oh you know, open AI, ChatGPT codecs are kind of like plug and play and very easy, less of a learning curve. Uh, but yeah, even within their own ecosystem, I think you're gonna start seeing you know people setting up these model routers, right? Like, yeah, using Fable Five as the you know front-end strategist and then kicking some of the actual work to like a sonnet or an Opus or maybe even a haiku. All right. Our next piece of AI news, a new study, is saying that well, most Americans don't think AI companies should own their own companies. So a new VeraSite survey found that 69% of those surveyed supported requiring major AI companies to transfer half of their stock into a publicly owned fund. Uh, so decent size survey, it covered about 1700 US adults, and it ran uh this past June. So a fairly recent poll, and it did support different party lines. So uh this was interesting because I thought originally seeing these kind of studies, I'm like, oh, this is gonna be across party lines, and it wasn't. So supports crossed party lines as 82 percent of those respondents were Democrats, 77 independents, and 59 of Republicans initially backed the proposal. Uh, then you know, when they uh survey people told people a little bit more information when they attached Bernie Sanders' name. Uh overall, the support fell to 64, uh, although nearly half of the Republicans still supported it. So, yeah, former uh presidential candidate, Democrat, uh Democrat independent uh Bernie Sanders. So, Sanders did introduce that related legislation about a month and a half ago, but forcing companies to surrender half their equity obviously faces enormous political, legal, and implementation barriers. And this new survey arrives as Frontier Labs prepare for public markets and technology companies cut jobs and the public debates who will capture AI's financial upside as they're looking to move into people's backyards for the needed data centers. So, also Sanders bill that he put out, it's not gonna pass, right? Uh, this is right. I used to cover politics like 95% of the stuff that you read about uh you know in the news, it never actually comes to a vote, right? Um, it's a way for Politicians to you know kick some dust and to you know push certain agendas. But you know what's interesting here is although I think that the 50% thing will never happen, right? Uh what's interesting is we talked about this on the show, I think last week is well, reportedly there might be uh some sort of a deal between open AI uh and the White House, giving the White House slash maybe the American people a cut of open AI when the company goes public. So, I mean, if employment disruption grows, a wealth distribution fund could become a recurring part of AI policy rather than just a fringe idea. But if you're thinking that, you know, uh Americans are gonna own 50% of AI companies, I'm gonna tell you that's not gonna happen. Might there be one of these smaller sovereign wealth funds uh where certain companies either uh voluntarily or are forced into giving a small percentage, you know, maybe uh, you know, one to five percent. It's a possibility, and we've seen that so far uh with open AI, according to reports, going to the table uh with the White House and seemingly being in favor of something like this, right? Not necessarily, there was no report saying uh that they were agreeable to the terms that were uh reported, but at least that they're in talks. All right, let's go to our next AI news story. A big week for Meta, and well, another uh maybe punch in the gut for anthropic with this one as well. So Meta compressed its year-long AI catch up into three days as the company released Muse Image, a Muse video preview, then its Muse Spark 1.1 model, and also its first public API. So Muse Image can search, write code, refine its own work, and coordinate with Muse Spark. So it launched across Meta AI, Instagram stories, and select what apps markets, uh, what app markets. So one rollout choice though, immediately backfired uh because meta previously include the ability to use AI to uh essentially kind of like the cameo feature feature that openai had in Sora, where you could use AI to just make uh any photos of you know public Instagram accounts, and meta pulled that out after a few a few days. All right, so that's meta or sorry, muse image. It actually looked pretty impressive with the uh kind of results that I saw. Then they have Muse Video, so this remains an early preview, so this is not a broad release, unlike the uh Muse image. So meta says it supports uh Muse Video supports native audio while acknowledging gaps in synchronization and fast motion. So, but the samples they did show looked pretty good, right? But uh it looks like it might be a while until there's a public-facing product on the video side, and then meta followed it up with Spark 1.1, uh, their newest large language model, which adds stronger coding, computer use, multi-agent orchestration, and a 1 million token context window. And that version now powers Meta AI's thinking mode. So here we go again. Zuck came out and essentially said, All the other companies are milking you when you're paying for tokens. We're gonna offer you a good model for very cheap. So yeah, uh, this is very much in the Grok 4.5 price range. So uh right now you can access it in public preview for a dollar twenty-five per million input tokens and four twenty-five per million output tokens. So yeah, uh very much uh they're in line uh with the grok prices at two and six, uh, right. So even a little less than that at a dollar twenty-five and four dollars and twenty-five cents. So uh I think overall, right, if you're just comparing the two, because if you're a company that just as an example, right, software development company, uh something in um you know, financial analysis, right? But essentially, if your company has become a uh token burning institution, but on the dev side, writing code, you know, you might be looking at some of these models licking your chops. I do think, at least according to most benchmarks, that it seems like Rock 4.5 is a little bit better on the coding side, uh, but at least Meta's new Muse Spark 1.1 is a viable alternative, which I most people were not expecting uh Meta to be on the bingo card of you know top four or five uh coding agents in mid-2026. But here we are, at least when it comes to price per performance, because like I said, it seems like the rest of 2026 and heading into 2027, price per performance is going to be the big factor, not just what is the best benchmark that they can throw out there. And speaking of uh Meta's good week, uh meta investors also learned that Meta plans to begin producing Iris, its first proprietary AI chip this September. So it will supplement rather than replace NVIDIA's A and AMD's GPUs. Uh so yeah, uh Meta is obviously one of NVIDIA's biggest customers, so they said that they just need more compute. So Wall Street liked the combined picture of the new photo model, the new video model, uh, the new text model, and the new iris chip, as their shares gained more than five percent on Friday, and they've already erased their 2026 losses, and Meta finished the week about 15 higher, so an overall huge week for Meta, but their week was not the best week, and that was open AI. So uh, we already alluded to the new GPT 5.6 soul, and we already kind of talked a little bit about the GPT live one model, and we did FYI do a dedicated episode on the new GPT 5.6 soul and the chat GPT work on Friday. So make sure you just go listen to that. That's episode 816. But let's do the quick recap here of what open AI introduced, and it is good. So open AI launched GPT 5.6 across three different varieties, as well as Chat GPT work, pairing a frontier model release with a new desktop agent for everyday knowledge work. So GPT 5.6 comes in three tiers. Soul is the flagship, while Terra is the medium model, and then low Luna is the cheaper and faster version. So Soul leads, uh, I mean, in just pretty much every single benchmark. So uh LM Arena, it's tied with Fable 5 at the top. If you look at artificial analysis, they have three main uh indexes. So yeah, GPT-5 Seoul leads in two of the three, and the other three, it's like one point behind. Uh so at least if you look at the uh four kind of major indexes that bring all these different votes and benchmarks together. Uh, open AI is tied or leading in three of the four. In the other one, they're only behind by one point. But the surprising thing here is right, GPT-5. Which is crazy because right, everyone said, Oh, it's gonna take years for you know open AI to ever catch anthropic when it comes to design. So, in a third party, uh, the most respected third party uh model where the people uh and experts vote on it. Yes, uh GPT 5.6 is uh great at front-end design. Uh so open AI's pricing, though, is the bigger pressure points because they list it at five dollars per million input and thirty dollars per million token output, uh, versus that 10 in 50 for Fable. So, yeah, it's about half of the price for more of the performance. So, yeah, that's why I said Anthropics had a really bad week. So, not only did they get knocked off at the frontier, uh, right, and we'll see. I'm sure Fable 5-1 uh or Opus 5 is going to be here any hour. And I have a guess on when that's actually going to be coming. So, not only did they get knocked off at the top end of their business, well, they also got maybe not knocked off, but they got chipped away at the bottom end because uh the last couple of months, uh, open weight models have actually become good enough for a lot of production use, and then you came in with the proprietary options that are very cheap and very good in Grock 4.5 and Muse Spark 1.1. So then all also from OpenAI is Chat GPT Work. So this turns the same model family, right? So the GPT 5.6 models into finished documents, right? Spreadsheets, presentations, analysis, websites, and other professional work. So uh the simplest way to put it, chat GPT work, because there is a little bit of confusion. I was confused as well. So essentially, the if you go to download the chat GPT desktop app, now you get well, it's called Chat GPT Work, which is essentially like codex light. Okay, so uh ChatGPT work is just codex, but a little simpler, right? It doesn't have you know as much of the uh coding tools accessible, it's just a cleaner, sleeker look. So it's if you're just used to the web version of Chat GPT, uh, it might be like 10% overwhelming at first. But what's strange, y'all know I'm a huge codecs lover, and I'm like Codecs is still available, FYI. There's been a lot of confusion on that, but essentially when you download the new Chat GPT desktop app now, ChatGPT Work, or if you go to download codecs, they're the same thing, and then there's a toggle at the top, right? So you either choose Chat GPT Work, and that gives you all the same features, just in a more uh minimal, non-technical interface. So it does all the same things, or you can choose codecs in the same app and then get some of those more technical views, right? So, as an example, in codecs now, there's a dedicated tab for pull requests, right? You don't have that in uh in in chat GPT work, and or you don't have the the diff view, right? So you can look at the difference between two generated pieces of codes. Uh, so there's a lot of actually since this was released on Thursday, there's actually been a handful of updates, and the team did announce that another big update is coming to the desktop app on Monday. This is great timing, it just so happens I'm doing a uh training on this, you know, a couple hours after this next big release is coming out. But uh, regardless, if you haven't checked out the new Chat GPT Work desktop app, it's really good because it is essentially just an easier, simpler version of Codex. All right, so that is a wrap for the big stories, but let's quickly go over the what's new and what's next. So uh Meta withdrew their Muse Image Instagram account reference feature, like I referenced, uh, after privacy backlash and criticism. Uh Infropic updated Claude Code with an in-app browser. All right. So took them a while to bring that after Codex has had it for a couple of months. Uh OpenAI's GPT-5.6 soul model set an ARC AGI3 benchmark record. Uh Meta Muse, uh, we talked about that already, but to recap, new image and video models. Uh rumors are suggesting that OpenAI will fast track GPT 6 with a new pre-train for potentially a summer launch to uh counter Anthropic's upcoming Fable 5 Mythos 5.1. Uh Meta discontinued. Oh, talked about that. I got some duplicates here. This is how you know this is put together by a human, and AI would never put together duplicates, right? Uh, CNBC reported a China-linked backdoor security threat tied to Claude Code. Uh OpenAI and new OpenAI entry solved all five at coder algorithm contest problems, outperforming top human competitors. Yes, the first time that's ever happened. It's a little above my head, but uh pretty impressive that OpenAI was able to solve all five at coder algorithm contest problems. All right, next, open AI also released their new GPT real-time 2.1. So kind of a version of the GPT live one that they released for ChatGPT. Um Notion Agents uh came out. That's a standalone iPhone app where you can use Notion Agents. Uh Google Voice AI, that's Gemini powered automatic call transcription and summary for businesses. Uh Bite Dances, C Dream 5.0 Pro. That's their new advanced image model with design, infographics, and layer editing. It is out, and their new video model should be coming out any day. Uh Anthropics 5, yeah, Enthropics Fable 5 got the access extended through July 19th. Oh, weird. What happened there? Well, that's a good place to end the show. And you know, I kind of alluded to this, I think, on the podcast um on Thursday and Friday, and I posted something on Twitter because originally the uh anthropic's Fable 5 was only supposed to be in uh subscription plans through yesterday, through Sunday, July 12th, and after GBD56 Soul came out, I said there's a zero percent chance that Anthropic gets rid of Fable Five in subscriptions. They will be bleeding eight figures a day. There's literally a zero percent chance, and sure enough, they extended it through next week. So, what does that mean? Well, that means this. This is my bold prediction. Join me next week, and we'll see if I was right or not. They're gonna do one of a couple of things, which is gonna be exciting to watch. You're either gonna come out with a mythos uh fable 5.1, which I would put a low probability, a higher probability is we see maybe an Opus 5 that would be at that GPT 5.6 soul level. Um, or we're gonna see a price cut for uh Fable 5 because I've heard like respected people in the industry essentially say that Fable 5 is a dead model, right? Not me saying it. Literally, I've heard it and seen it from a lot of respected people that are said we're never gonna touch Fable Five again because of the pricing, right? The capabilities are there, but when open AI comes and they undercut it, and you say, Oh, Fable Five, this 5.6 soul is as good, but actually better, and it costs like half. And depending on what benchmark you look at, right? Like the artificial analysis cost index, it's like a third. Yeah, it's not gonna that's what I said. Very bad week for anthropic. But what makes that fun is we do know that we're gonna get either new models or cheaper prices from anthropic probably in the next week. That would be my guess. All right, so that's a wrap. I hope this was helpful. If so, if you haven't already, please subscribe to the podcast and then go to your everydayai.com. Sign up for the free daily newsletter. We'll see you back tomorrow in every day for more everyday AI. Thanks, y'all.