Energy Crue

From the Table: Extended Laterals

Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.

0:00 | 25:20

Send us Fan Mail

We share a raw operator roundtable on extreme extended laterals and the real reasons teams keep pushing beyond three-mile horizontals. We break down the physics, the economics, and the hard calls engineers make when the toolstring, the frac, or the surface plant becomes the limiting factor. 

• how “extreme” laterals become routine and why length keeps rising 
• surface cost amortization and the trade-off of weaker toe performance 
• why M&A rewards operators with proprietary drilling capability and capital depth 
• regional geology differences and how tortuosity drives exponential friction 
• torque and drag limits, model breakdowns, and reliance on empirical real-time data 
• stuck tools, tripping risk, and the shift from well economics to program economics 
• frac chemistry at five miles, polymer shear, and preventing screenouts 
• retraining on-site decision-making and paying premiums for endurance-focused services 
• surface facility bottlenecks and the case for the next efficiency boom above ground 

Let me know what you think.


Why These Roundtables Exist

SPEAKER_00

Welcome to Energy Crew Podcast. I'm your host, JP Warren. I got something excited kind of that we're doing. This is a new project, a new direction, just kind of a new way to get information out there to you, the listeners. One of the things that I do, I host these uh operator roundtables, and these are kind of candid strategic conversations in a room full of primarily operators, 70% decision maker, manager level, or above, and select service providers. And what we do, we host these round table conversations that we discuss industry challenges, where the industry is going, and various other topics. And pretty much what we do, we record every single one. And I was thinking, how do we actually share, showcase this information and disseminate it throughout our listeners, throughout our audience? And the perfect way is through AI, through all these tools out there, I'm able to upload the transcripts from these round tables and it actually come out and spit out a podcast. So actually, if you can't attend the table, you understand what we're talking about. So this is just another tool to under to talk to understand what operators are talking about, what challenges are in their mind, and how we're actually moving forward as an industry. This first episode I have for you, if you're not, if you're listening to the first episode, I just released a quarterly industry pulse, which we took about 10 transcripts and kind of pumped out a podcast. And this one, we're doing a round table specific. And this actually took place in Oklahoma City with Jeremy Ents, who was over at Ascent, who was over at Flywheel Now, led a conversation on extended laterals for drilling. How far could we go and how far should we go? And it was a packed round table. I think we had 22 or 24 people at the table diving in to extended laterals, and it was a great conversation. And I took that transcript, uploaded it, and we now have a podcast, and that's what you're about to listen to. So um I hope you enjoy. Let me know what you think. And uh thanks for tuning in to Energy Crew Podcast.

SPEAKER_01

I mean, just imagine sitting in an office chair, uh a joystick in your hand, and you are steering a drill bit through solid rock.

SPEAKER_02

Right. Literally crushing rock miles away.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. Now that drill bit is five miles away from you, completely horizontal underground. That is roughly the distance from, you know, a downtown office building to your local airport.

SPEAKER_02

Yeah, it's an insane distance to even conceptualize.

SPEAKER_01

And you are doing this entirely blindfolded, just relying on sensor data. Plus, you have to keep that spinning bit within a perfectly straight, like 10-foot window.

SPEAKER_02

Right, because if you veer outside of it, you lose millions.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, millions of dollars. Welcome to the deep dive, everyone. Today we are bringing you inside a closed-door roundtable discussion featuring senior drilling and completions engineers from some of the top operators.

SPEAKER_02

Aaron Powell And we really want to be clear right out of the gate here this isn't some polished corporate PR brochure.

SPEAKER_01

No, definitely not. This is a raw, very grounded look at extreme extended laterals. We're going to explore not just how far they can push that bit, but the intense operational realities of why they are doing it.

SPEAKER_02

And the million-dollar stakes when things go wrong in the dark, which uh happens more than people like to admit.

SPEAKER_01

Okay, let's unpack this because the definition of what actually constitutes an extreme well seems to have completely changed almost overnight.

SPEAKER_02

Aaron Powell What's fascinating here is how quickly the extreme has become routine. I mean, look at the industry just five years ago.

SPEAKER_01

Right, a three-mile lateral was a huge deal.

SPEAKER_02

Exactly. Drilling a three-mile lateral, so about 15,000 feet horizontally was considered incredibly sporty. It raised eyebrows, it was a massive operational risk. And now. Today, the average wells these engineers are discussing are over 16,000 feet. And the real envelope pushers, they are going far beyond that.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, looking at the notes, some operators are pushing past 34,000 feet in total measured depth.

SPEAKER_02

We are talking over six miles of steel pipe rotating in the earth. It's wild.

The Surface Cost Math Driving Length

SPEAKER_01

It really is. But to understand why they are pushing six miles of pipe into the earth, you first have to understand the financial engine driving this kind of extreme engineering.

SPEAKER_02

Right. Because drilling five miles horizontally isn't a vanity project. They aren't doing it for a plaque on the wall.

SPEAKER_01

No, it all comes down to the brutal economics of the surface.

SPEAKER_02

Spot on. The primary driver here is amortizing fixed costs. When an operator drills a well, they have to acquire a surface location, build a heavy-duty pad, and drill the vertical drop.

SPEAKER_01

Just to reach the target reservoir, yeah.

SPEAKER_02

Exactly. And that vertical section plus that surface pad costs the exact same whether the subsequent horizontal lateral is one mile long or five miles long.

SPEAKER_01

I came up with an analogy to visualize the math here while I was prepping for this. Think of it like paying a massive, incredibly expensive toll to get your car onto a restricted highway.

SPEAKER_02

Okay. I like that. The vertical drill is the toll.

SPEAKER_01

Right. The toll is the vertical drill and the surface pad. Once you have paid that massive toll, you want to drive as many miles as physically possible on that single ticket to get your money's worth.

SPEAKER_02

You definitely don't want to take the first exit.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. If you get off the first exit, your cost per mile is just astronomical. You want to drive to the end of the state.

SPEAKER_02

And the toll itself is getting exponentially more expensive, which really forces the issue. Take the Northeast, specifically Ohio, for example.

SPEAKER_01

Oh yeah. The roundtable engineers had a lot to say about Ohio.

SPEAKER_02

They noted that finding surface locations in the Marcellus and Utica is incredibly difficult and shockingly expensive due to population density and topography.

SPEAKER_01

The surface damages alone are insane. The money operators have to pay landowners just to disrupt the surface, can easily run over six figures.

SPEAKER_02

Right, or top$20,000 a week.

SPEAKER_01

A week.

SPEAKER_02

Yeah. So saving yourself from having to permit, lease, and build an entirely new vertical well and surface pad by simply drilling a 5,000 foot longer horizontal hole from your existing pad. It saves an absolute fortune in upfront capital.

SPEAKER_01

But there is a calculated trade-off, though, right? The roundtable notes that operators actually lose a bit of recovery efficiency at the far end of these megawells.

SPEAKER_02

Aaron Powell They do. They mentioned about a 5% drop in recovery per foot at the toe of the well.

SPEAKER_01

So the very end of the pipe.

SPEAKER_02

Right. The physics of drawing oil and gas from five miles away dictates that your pressure drawdown just won't be perfectly uniform. The heel of the, well, the part closest to the vertical drop will produce more efficiently than the toe.

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Powell But they do it anyway because it's a brilliant operational compromise.

SPEAKER_02

Exactly. That 5% loss in reservoir recovery at the toe is completely eclipsed by the massive savings in capital efficiency on the surface.

SPEAKER_01

Because avoiding the cost of a whole new surface pad completely validates sacrificing a tiny fraction of recovery at the absolute end of the lateral.

SPEAKER_02

The economics are so undeniable that it has actually become a major catalyst for mergers and acquisitions across multiple basins right now.

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Powell Wait, if it's just a matter of drilling further to improve the economics, why are companies selling their assets? Why don't the original owners just hire better rigs and drill the longer laterals themselves?

SPEAKER_02

Aaron Powell Well, because executing a four or five mile lateral isn't just about renting a bigger rig. It requires a massive integration of proprietary engineering IP, customized MUD programs, highly specialized telemetry.

SPEAKER_01

And massive capital reserves to absorb the risk.

SPEAKER_02

Exactly. So you have operators looking at a competitor's portfolio of tier two, two-mile inventory. The original owner just lacks the technical capability and the balance sheet to push those wells further.

SPEAKER_01

So the acquiring company buys those assets specifically because their proprietary engineering allows them to turn those two mile wells into three or four mile wells.

SPEAKER_02

You got it. It instantly transforms marginal acreage into highly profitable tier one inventory without the original owner ever realizing the potential they were sitting on.

SPEAKER_01

Here's where it gets really interesting. Because if longer laterals fundamentally rewrite the profitability of a basin, why isn't every operator in the country just automatically drilling five-mile wells everywhere? Trevor Burrus, Jr.

Geology Shifts And Tortuosity Fights Back

SPEAKER_02

Right. It seems like a no-brainer. But the answer, according to the round table, is that the subsurface physics completely changed depending on your zip code.

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Powell The Earth is not a uniform factory floor.

SPEAKER_02

No, not at all. You have to look at regional geological differences to understand the operational nightmares these engineers face.

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Powell Let's start with the Northeast, places like the Marcellus and Utica shales.

SPEAKER_02

Yeah, the engineers describe this as a highly forgiving, relatively flat and benign geological environment. The rock layers are straightforward, with inclination angles usually sitting comfortably between 88 and 92 degrees.

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Powell It's basically a flat layer cake. So in that environment, physics isn't the primary limitation.

SPEAKER_02

Aaron Powell Far from it. In the Northeast, they can push past 20,000 feet with relative ease. Their biggest hurdle is almost entirely above ground.

SPEAKER_01

Land and leasing, right?

SPEAKER_02

Exactly. It's the legal and political nightmare of stitching enough individual property units together to legally drill a five-mile line underground without crossing a boundary they haven't leased.

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Powell But then you transition down to the mid-continent, Oklahoma, the scoop, the stack, and the tone of the roundtable completely shifts.

SPEAKER_02

Aaron Powell Oh, completely. The mid-continent sounds like an absolute drilling nightmare compared to Ohio.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, in the mid-continent, operators are dealing with massive geological faults, unpredictable stress regimes, and major inclination changes.

SPEAKER_02

The rock actively pushes the bit around, forcing angles up to 95 degrees. And this volatile geology introduces the absolute biggest operational enemy of the extended lateral.

SPEAKER_01

Tortuosity. Yes. Tortuosity.

SPEAKER_02

So how does a tiny, say, 15-foot deviation at the very top of the well completely ruin a drilling operation four miles later?

SPEAKER_01

Well, we have to look at the mechanics of well bore friction. If you have ever wrapped a rope around a tree trunk to hold a heavy load, you are familiar with the capstan effect.

SPEAKER_02

Yeah, like tying off a boat on a dock.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. Just one or two wraps of that rope create so much exponential friction that you can hold a massive boat in place with one hand. Tortuosity in a well bore acts the exact same way.

SPEAKER_02

So if the rig drifts 15 feet off the line early in the drill path, the steering tools can easily correct back to the center line.

SPEAKER_01

But they have just created a micro S curve. Right. A little kink in the pipe.

SPEAKER_02

And every single piece of steel that follows has to drag through that S curve. Yeah. And friction in a well bore is exponential, not linear. By the time you are trying to push your drill string, your wire line, or your casing three or four miles down the hole, that tiny kink at the top is gripping the pipe with immense force.

SPEAKER_01

Just like the rope around the tree.

SPEAKER_02

Exactly. The torque and drag become so massive that wire lines will stretch and snap. Casing simply cannot be pushed down to the bottom because the sheer compressive force required exceeds the yield strength of the steel.

SPEAKER_01

It just crushes under its own weight. The engineers explicitly noted that if they hand a 14,000 foot well plan to a rig and the rig drifts 15 feet off the line, they just let the directional drillers correct it.

SPEAKER_02

But if it's a 24,000-foot well plan, they explicitly tell the drillers do not overcorrect.

SPEAKER_01

Right. They say do not put an S curve in this hole early on, or we will never reach the finish line.

SPEAKER_02

And because of this exponential friction, the standard industry friction models the predictive software that engineers have relied on for decades, completely break down at these extreme lengths.

SPEAKER_01

The physics just gets incredibly complex out past 25,000 feet.

SPEAKER_02

Yeah. The drill pipe begins to undergo unpredictable helical buckling under the massive compression. Plus, the thermodynamic shifts in the drilling mud at those depths change the fluid's viscosity.

SPEAKER_01

Which alters the lubricity in ways the software can't accurately map.

SPEAKER_02

Aaron Powell Exactly. Operators literally have to throw out the textbook models. They rely entirely on their own empirical real-time data from the previous extreme wells just to predict if they can physically turn the drill pipe another hundred feet.

Stuck Tools And Killing Sunk Costs

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Powell And because fighting that exponential friction is essentially a losing battle, it forces operators to make a brutal financial calculation when they inevitably get stuck.

SPEAKER_02

Which brings us to arguably the most jarring operational shift discussed in this entire round table.

SPEAKER_01

Right. What happens when a multimillion dollar drilling assembly gets stuck 30,000 feet underground?

SPEAKER_02

Well, the historical instinct in the oil field, the absolute mandate was to go get it. You do not leave a multimillion dollar tool and a thousand feet of untapped reservoir sitting in the dark.

SPEAKER_01

You initiate a fishing operation, you go pull it out.

SPEAKER_02

But fishing requires tripping the pipe. And as the round table pointed out, tripping 30,000 feet of pipe out of a hole isn't just an annoyance. It is a massive operational hazard.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, tripping pipe at 10,000 feet is a standard procedure. Tripping a multi-mile drill string out to fix a tool and then pushing it all the way back in takes days of continuous rig time.

SPEAKER_02

And at 30,000 feet, you are dealing with incredible hydrostatic pressure from 15-pound drilling mud and extreme bottom hole temperatures.

SPEAKER_01

You can surface test an electronic tool and it works perfectly. But then you trip it 28,000 feet down a hole, vibrating the entire way down through a gauntlet of heat and pressure.

SPEAKER_02

The odds of the sensitive electronics inside that tool failing by the time it reaches the bottom again are terrifyingly high.

SPEAKER_01

Not to mention, the rotary steerable tools they use to navigate at the tip of the drill string cost around$1.3 million a piece.

SPEAKER_02

Even with the standard 50% insurance coverage, leaving one stuck at the bottom of the well is a massive financial blow.

SPEAKER_01

Wait, so if the tool is worth that much, are they seriously teaching their engineers to just abandon a million-dollar asset, abandon the remaining lateral, and walk away? That seems entirely counterintuitive for an industry obsessed with capital efficiency.

SPEAKER_02

If we connect this to the bigger picture, it actually represents a massive maturation in the industry's financial philosophy. It is the ultimate defeat of the sump cost fallacy.

SPEAKER_01

Explain the math behind that prioritization, because it's wild.

SPEAKER_02

So the new operator mandate discussed at the roundtable is prioritizing program economics over well economics. Imagine your directional tool fails at 33,000 feet on a planned 34,000 foot well.

SPEAKER_01

Okay, so you are a thousand feet short of your target.

SPEAKER_02

Right. If you stop the entire rig operation to fish that tool out or trip a new and in, you lose at least a week of continuous rig time.

SPEAKER_01

And that week of idle rig time completely cascades through your yearly schedule.

SPEAKER_02

Exactly. It delays the completions crew waiting to frack the well. It delays the production facilities waiting to process the oil.

SPEAKER_01

So that single week of waiting burns millions of dollars in delayed corporate cash flow across multiple departments.

SPEAKER_02

Yeah. One of the engineers made a comment detailing exactly how pragmatic this has become. He noted they are much more willing to abandon a stuck tool and walk away from a well in January than they are in December.

SPEAKER_01

Just simply because losing a week of schedule in January has 12 months to cascade and ruin the entire annual financial program for the whole company.

SPEAKER_02

Exactly. Whereas in December, the yearly targets are already largely baked in. It requires a ruthlessly detached approach to operations.

SPEAKER_01

Management has to train engineers to separate themselves emotionally from the loss of the hardware and look purely at the quarterly cash flow.

SPEAKER_02

Leaving a million dollars in the dirt stings, but halting a massive integrated manufacturing operation for a week damages the balance sheet infinitely more.

SPEAKER_01

They simply make the call, declare the well at 33,000 feet as total depth, cement it in, and move the rig to the next pad.

SPEAKER_02

But because abandoning a well is the ultimate last resort, the drilling teams are highly incentivized to get to total depth successfully.

SPEAKER_01

Right. But reaching total depth just hands the nightmare over to the next group.

SPEAKER_02

Oh, absolutely.

Frac Chemistry Limits And New Playbooks

SPEAKER_01

Let's say you defeat the friction. You don't get stuck. You successfully drill a five-mile hole perfectly inside the window. You have a new, arguably, much harder problem.

SPEAKER_02

How do you actually frack a hole that long without blowing up your surface facilities?

SPEAKER_01

Oh, exactly. This is the supreme irony of the extended lateral era. The drilling engineers have mastered the physics of making long holes so effectively that they have accidentally created a crisis for the completions teams.

SPEAKER_02

The pumping technology and the chemical engineering simply have not caught up to the capabilities of the drill bit.

SPEAKER_01

To frack these wells, operators pump massive volumes of sand and water down the casing to prop open the microscopic fractures in the rock.

SPEAKER_02

But when the well is five miles long, it takes the sand eight to nine full minutes just to travel from the surface pumps to the toe of the well.

SPEAKER_01

And the chemicals they use to make the water slick enough to carry that sand, the friction reducers, or FR, were never designed for that kind of endurance.

SPEAKER_02

No, we have to look at the chemistry of why they fail. Friction reducers rely on long-chain polymer molecules to reduce the turbulence of the water, allowing it to carry heavy sand at high speeds.

SPEAKER_01

But over a nine-minute journey down a multi-mile pipe under immense sustained pressure, those polymer chains experience severe mechanical shear degradation.

SPEAKER_02

The physical turbulence literally tears the molecules apart.

SPEAKER_01

And when those polymer chains shear and fail, the fluid loses its carrying capacity. The sand drops out of the fluid mid-journey.

SPEAKER_02

Resulting in what the industry calls screening out. A screen out is when the sand completely packs off and clogs the well bore.

SPEAKER_01

And a screen out at 10,000 feet is a bad day. A screen out at 30,000 feet is a multimillion dollar catastrophe.

SPEAKER_02

Yeah, to clean out a multimile pipe clogged with packed sand, you have to bring in coiled tubing units, giant spools of continuous steel pipe to wash it out.

SPEAKER_01

But pushing coiled tubing 30,000 feet introduces the exact same exponential friction and helical buckling problems the drillers faced.

SPEAKER_02

It takes weeks, costs a fortune, and there is a very high probability you might never fully clean it out, effectively abandoning the bottom section of the mega well anyway.

SPEAKER_01

The operators literally cannot afford to have their completions teams screening out these massive investments. So how are they mitigating a chemical limitation they can't engineer their way out of yet?

SPEAKER_02

Well, the solution discussed at the roundtable isn't a new chemical additive. It is a complete shift in human psychology and on-site management.

SPEAKER_01

Because historically, the on-site representatives, the OSRs managing the frack job on the surface, were judged strictly by the design spreadsheets.

SPEAKER_02

Engineering wanted to see that every single pound of sand planned for that stage was pumped into the ground. If you left sand out, you failed the design.

SPEAKER_01

But now, because the financial penalty of a screen out is so devastating at these extreme depths, operators are explicitly retraining their OSRs to watch the surface pressure gauges over the spreadsheet.

SPEAKER_02

If they see a pressure spike indicating the sand is starting to pack off downhole, they are empowered to immediately hit the kill switch.

SPEAKER_01

The mandate from management is crystal clear. Do not pump the sweep. Do not try to force the sand through.

SPEAKER_02

Intentionally leave sand out of the hole, flush the well, call the stage complete, and move on to the next one.

SPEAKER_01

They are evaluating the OSRs now on their ability to prevent catastrophic interventions, not on perfect sand placement.

SPEAKER_02

And in tandem with that, they're also deliberately flooding the well with expensive friction reducer chemicals.

SPEAKER_01

Because the old operational mindset was always focused on saving pennies by optimizing chemical dosage.

SPEAKER_02

Right. But now the operators at the round table essentially stated they're overdosing the FR. The cost of excess chemicals is a rounding error compared to the cost of a catastrophic well intervention.

SPEAKER_01

This represents a massive strategic takeaway for any service companies supporting these operators. The value proposition has fundamentally shifted.

SPEAKER_02

Operators are no longer looking to save pennies on the budget option. They demand a 95 to 98% probability of operational success.

SPEAKER_01

Service companies need to design their entire product lines explicitly for 40,000 foot endurance.

SPEAKER_02

We see that specifically with downhole tools like bridge plugs, right? The plugs they use to isolate sections of the well during fracking.

SPEAKER_01

Precisely. Standard bridge plugs were not designed to withstand the cyclic pressure and extreme temperature variations of being said five miles deep for extended periods.

SPEAKER_02

When a bridge plug loses isolation during a frack job at those depths, the entire stage is compromised.

SPEAKER_01

If a service company can engineer a plug, a wireline cable, or a chemical suite that they can guarantee won't fail or shear apart at five miles deep, the operators will happily pay a premium for it. Failure is simply too expensive.

SPEAKER_02

It is genuinely incredible to see how a physical limitation downhole totally reshapes the corporate budgeting and management psychology happening in high-rises.

Reliability Premiums And Surface Bottlenecks

SPEAKER_01

We have covered the surface economics, the exponential friction, the defeat of the sunk cost fallacy, and the completions chemistry nightmare. As the roundtable wrapped up, the operators started looking toward the future.

SPEAKER_02

And the consensus was very clear. The era of chasing records, you know, drilling a 35,000-foot well just to get your company's name in a trade magazine is effectively over.

SPEAKER_01

The ego has completely drained out of the engineering. The new operational goal is seamless, boring repeatability.

SPEAKER_02

They want to drill a 24,000-foot well over and over again with zero drama and zero interventions.

SPEAKER_01

But interestingly, as they have mastered the subsurface environment to achieve that repeatability, they are now slamming into a totally different operational ceiling.

SPEAKER_02

And this one is located right back on the surface.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, the surface facility bottlenecks. The production numbers the engineers were throwing around are almost difficult to. Comprehend.

SPEAKER_02

A massively successful extreme lateral can produce 7,000 barrels of oil or 200 million cubic feet of gas every single day from a single hole.

SPEAKER_01

Those volumes are staggering and they completely overwhelm standard surface infrastructure.

SPEAKER_02

You can drill the most mechanically perfect five-mile well in the basin, but if your surface processing facility can only handle half of what the well is capable of delivering.

SPEAKER_01

Or if your environmental error permits legally capped the volume, you can move them.

SPEAKER_02

Right. You have effectively built a massive five-lane highway that leads directly into a one-lane pole booth.

SPEAKER_01

The hydrocarbons literally have nowhere to go, forcing you to choke back the well and delay your return on investment.

SPEAKER_02

So what does this all mean?

SPEAKER_01

Well, we started this deep dive exploring the sheer audacity of steering a drill bit five miles horizontally. We unpacked how the high upfront costs of surface real estate drove the industry to push horizontally.

SPEAKER_02

We detailed how varying geology dictates the extreme physics of torque, drag, and exponential friction.

SPEAKER_01

And how those massive financial risks forced companies to rewrite their operational rulebooks, abandoning their own million-dollar tools to protect their broader schedules.

SPEAKER_02

The drillers pushed the physical limits, the completions teams are scrambling to keep their chemistry intact.

SPEAKER_01

And now, ironically, the massive success of the megawell has bottlenecked the surface.

SPEAKER_02

This raises an important question, and it highlights a fascinating paradigm shift for the broader energy sector.

SPEAKER_01

For the last 20 years, the most intense capital investment and innovation in this industry has been focused downward on the drill bit, the telemetry, the mud motors, and the subsurface mapping.

SPEAKER_02

But if drilling technology has now successfully outpaced the chemical engineering of fracking and completely outpaced the physical processing capacity of our surface penalties.

SPEAKER_01

Is the next great capital boom not going to happen underground at all?

SPEAKER_02

It seems highly likely the next multi-billion dollar frontier in energy efficiency is going to be entirely on the surface.

SPEAKER_01

We are looking at a massive pivot toward utilizing AI-driven facility management, edge computing, to optimize flow rates in real time.

The Next Frontier Moves Above Ground

SPEAKER_02

And advanced modular materials to instantly process, route, and manage the massive tidal wave of energy these megawells are unleashing.

SPEAKER_01

The drilling engineers have unequivocally proven they can find the reservoir and tap it from five miles away. The next time you were driving past an industrial park or an airport, consider the reality that somewhere beneath you, a team of engineers might be confidently steering a drill bit through solid rock, blindfolded, staying within a 10-foot window, all while managing the exact microeconomics of a multimillion dollar operation.

SPEAKER_02

It's an invisible world right under our feet.

SPEAKER_01

Thanks for joining us on this deep dive. We'll see you next time.