David Invest

Rates on Hold: What It Means for Your Wallet & Business

• David (Viacheslav) Davidenko

Share episode

The Federal Reserve's reluctance to cut interest rates has become one of the most hotly debated economic topics of the year. Despite mounting pressure from the White House and financial markets, the Fed has held rates steady at 4.25-4.50% for the fifth consecutive time. What's driving this steadfast position, and what does it mean for your financial future?

At the core of the Fed's cautious approach is a persistent concern about inflation that refuses to fully retreat. While the job market remains relatively stable—with unemployment hovering between 4.0% and 4.2%—inflation data continues to move in the wrong direction. The Fed's preferred measure, the PCE index, actually increased from 2.4% to 2.6% in June, moving further from their 2% target. Adding complexity to this picture are aggressive tariff policies that have directly pushed up prices across imported goods categories. Furniture prices jumped 1.3%, appliances surged 1.9%, and computers rose 1.4%—all in just one month.

Fed Chair Jerome Powell finds himself walking an extraordinary tightrope. On one side, he faces increasingly personal attacks from President Trump, who has even suggested Powell's handling of a building renovation could justify his dismissal. On the other side lies the Fed's institutional commitment to data-driven decision-making rather than political expediency. This tension has even manifested within the Fed itself, with two governors dissenting at the July meeting—the first such dual dissent since 1993. As September's meeting approaches and the Jackson Hole Symposium looms in late August, market expectations fluctuate wildly with each new economic report. The central question remains: How much independence does a central bank need to ensure long-term economic stability? Follow our analysis as we continue tracking this high-stakes economic standoff and its implications for your financial wellbeing.

🔗 Check out our website for more information and valuable resources: https://linkin.bio/davidinvest

📸 Follow us on Instagram for updates and behind-the-scenes content: https://www.instagram.com/davidinvestai/

🔗 Network with me on LinkedIn for professional connections and advice: https://www.linkedin.com/in/vdavidenko/

📧 Subscribe to our newsletter for exclusive investment tips and insights: https://sunrisecapitalgroup.com/subscribe/

📚 Check out my course on Udemy - https://www.udemy.com/course/passive-real-estate-investing/

Disclaimer: The content provided on this channel is intended for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial, or tax advice. We strongly recommend that you consult with qualified professionals before making any financial decisions. Past performance of investments is not indicative of future results. The information presented here is not a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or investments. Our firm may have conflicts of interest, and we do not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of the content provided. Investing involves risks, and you should carefully consid...

Speaker 1:

So here's the big question, right? Why won't the Federal Reserve cut interest rates? I mean, there's immense pressure, especially, you know, coming from the Oval Office. It's something I've been thinking about a lot, particularly now they've decided to hold steady again. That's the fifth time in a row. Rates are still sitting at 4.25 percent to 4.50 percent. So this deep dive, this is our chance to really unpack what's going on behind those Fed decisions. What does it actually mean for you, for your wallet, for your business? Okay, let's try and peel back the layers on this.

Speaker 2:

Well, if you had to boil it down to just one thing, the Fed's cautious approach. It's really all about uncertainty.

Speaker 1:

Uncertainty yeah.

Speaker 2:

Federal Reserve Chair, Jerome Powell. He's been very clear Stubborn inflation is still the main concern. Bill number one Absolutely, and he's actually pointed fingers specifically at that could really damage the job market unnecessarily. It's a tough balancing act.

Speaker 1:

OK. So if inflation is the big worry and they're walking that kind of tightrope, what about the job market? How is it actually looking right now? Does that give them any wiggle room?

Speaker 2:

Actually, the employment side looks pretty solid, as they say. Pretty solid, ok, the employment side looks pretty solid as they say Pretty solid. Ok, yeah, the unemployment rate, it's held steady, been in a pretty narrow range like 4.0 percent to 4.2 percent, basically, since May 2024. Ok Now, job growth has slowed down a bit, sure, but we're definitely not seeing, you know, mass layoffs everywhere. So it's not the side that's setting off immediate alarm bells.

Speaker 1:

Gotcha, so the job market feels relatively stable.

Speaker 2:

Yeah.

Speaker 1:

Which is good news, I guess. But inflation is still, as you said, stickier than anyone hoped, exactly. And that brings us to this other layer, right, the tariffs, the impact of these really aggressive tariff policies. How are they actually messing with the inflation numbers?

Speaker 2:

Right, and this is where it gets you know really insightful President Trump's tariff policies. They've ramped up a lot this year and what's fascinating, or maybe concerning, is how they're directly impacting the very inflation numbers the Fed uses.

Speaker 1:

How so.

Speaker 2:

Well, take the Fed's favorite measure, the PCE index personal consumption expenditures. It basically tracks what you pay for stuff. That jumped. It went from 2.4 percent in May up to 2.6 percent in June. That's moving further away from the Fed's 2 percent target, Not close.

Speaker 1:

Yeah, the wrong direction.

Speaker 2:

Precisely so it makes it harder to tell what's broad economic inflation and what's just well, these policy driven price hikes.

Speaker 1:

And are we seeing that in specific things, like stuff people actually buy every day?

Speaker 2:

Oh, absolutely. You see the price increases exactly where you'd expect goods that are heavily imported.

Speaker 1:

Like what.

Speaker 2:

Well, furniture, for instance, prices up 1.3 percent in just one month. Appliances they jumped 1.9 percent, Computers up 1.4 percent.

Speaker 1:

Wow, those are pretty significant jumps for one month. They really are, and Fed Chair Powell to you. Know your checkout receipt. But here's something I wonder about If the tariffs are so clearly pushing up prices and maybe skewing the data, why isn't the political heat more on the tariffs themselves instead of just on the Fed for how they react to the inflation? Is the Fed kind of taking the fall here?

Speaker 2:

That's a really sharp question and it perfectly highlights this political tightrope Powell is forced to walk. Yeah, he's facing these attacks from President Trump getting more and more personal, demanding immediate rate cuts. I mean, trump even suggested, ridiculously, that how Powell handled a building renovation could be grounds for firing him.

Speaker 1:

Yeah, a building renovation, seriously, yeah, that's pretty extraordinary. It really shows the level of pressure, that very personal kind of attack. How does the Fed even operate? How does it maintain credibility facing that kind of direct challenge?

Speaker 2:

It's an incredibly difficult position but Powell and you know the rest of the FOMC they're sticking to their strategic reasoning. As Powell himself put it, if you move too early you might end up not getting inflation all the way back down.

Speaker 1:

Right, the first risk.

Speaker 2:

If you move too late, you do unnecessary damage to the labor market. That's the other side of it, the balance Exactly, and this is where that institutional independence becomes so vital. It lets the Fed make these hard calls, often unpopular ones, based on the economic data, not political wins. It shields the economy from well potentially damaging short-term political moves. Their core message seems to be look, they'd rather be criticized for moving too slowly than risk unleashing inflation again. And maybe, just maybe, despite all the frustration from politicians and markets, that cautious approach is what the economy actually needs for stability right now.

Speaker 1:

OK, so that cautious approach brings us to what's next, the September suspense, you could call it. The next big meeting for the Fed's policy committee, the FOMC, is in September. It's interesting because there's a longer gap than usual between the July meeting and this one, that longer gap.

Speaker 2:

it definitely allows more time for new data to come in, but yeah, it also creates a lot more uncertainty in this one. Right, that longer gap. It definitely allows more time for new data to come in, but, yeah, it also creates a lot more uncertainty in the meantime.

Speaker 1:

Has it affected what markets expect?

Speaker 2:

Oh, absolutely. Market expectations for a September rate cut. They've been all over the place. Before Powell's last press conference, odds were maybe around 65 percent, afterwards dropped closer to 40 percent.

Speaker 1:

Wow, quite a swing.

Speaker 2:

Yeah, and there's something else brewing internally too, suggesting maybe growing pressure inside the Fed. Two Fed governors, both appointed by Trump, actually dissented at the July meeting. They voted for a rate cut.

Speaker 1:

Two dissenters Is that common?

Speaker 2:

No, not at all. It's actually the first time since 1993 that two governors have opposed a rate decision at the same time. So it signals, you know, some real disagreement bubbling up.

Speaker 1:

Okay. So despite that internal pressure, Powell keeps saying he's data dependent. What specific data points are they really watching? What would give him the cover he might need to actually start cutting?

Speaker 2:

Well, it really comes down to two main things the jobs reports and the core inflation data.

Speaker 1:

Right.

Speaker 2:

And, interestingly, the July jobs report which came out after the last Fed meeting. It showed things slowing down a bit. Job growth came in at one hundred forty seven thousand down from June, and the unemployment rate was expected to maybe tick up slightly to four point two percent.

Speaker 1:

So a bit softer.

Speaker 2:

Exactly that's the kind of softening that could potentially give Powell the justification the cover, as you put it to start cutting rates. It lets him say see, the data is showing some weakness. Now's the time, rather than looking like he's just giving in to political pressure.

Speaker 1:

So what are the odds now? What's the smart money saying about cuts later this year? Is September still on the table?

Speaker 2:

You know, the smart money does seem to still be betting on cuts before the year is out. But the exact timing, that's still pretty murky. Goldman Sachs economists, for example they still see a chance, maybe somewhat above 50%, for a cut in September. Others are thinking maybe October or even later.

Speaker 1:

So still quite uncertain.

Speaker 2:

Very much so. The key things everyone's watching are unemployment trends Does it keep ticking up? Core inflation Does it start moving down again? And those tariff driven price hikes Was that just a one month blip or is it sticking around? And one more thing to keep an eye on the Jackson Hole Symposium that's coming up August 21st to 23rd. Powell often uses that speech to send some pretty important signals about policy direction.

Speaker 1:

Right. Jackson Hole is always closely watched. Yeah, OK so pulling it all together. What does this all mean for you? Listening right now?

Speaker 2:

Well, it means you're watching this ongoing pretty high stakes standoff. Really it's the Fed's data driven approach versus some really intense political pressure. And, worth remembering, powell's term as chair is up in May 2026. President Trump has already made it clear he plans to replace him, so the future of the central bank itself is kind of in play. Yeah, absolutely. For now, though, the Fed seems really determined. They're signaling they'll let the economic data, and not political tweets, guide their hand.

Speaker 1:

Stick into their guns.

Speaker 2:

Right. That message is clear Better to be criticized for being slow than to risk letting inflation run wild again, which you know leaves us with a pretty big question for you to think about how much independence does a central bank really need for economic stability, especially when that independence frustrates markets, frustrates politicians? When should economic policy be insulated from politics? And well, when should it maybe be more responsive? It's a fundamental tension.

People on this episode

Head Shot

David (Viacheslav) Davidenko

Host