ChristiTutionalist (TM) Politics

ChristiTutionalist Politics (S1E17) "Leftists and the 7 D's"

Joseph M. Lenard Season 1 Episode 17

"GIVE FEEDBACK (no-reply-text (2-way comm: https://JosephMLenard.us/contact))"

S1E17 SHOW NOTES  ( listen (Sat Oct 14 2023 and thereafter) at: http://buzzsprout.com/2210487 )...
ChristiTutionalist Politics (S1E17) "Leftists and the 7 D's"
Topic TheLibertyBeacon.com "Leftists and the 7 D's" piece! 
When a Leftist cannot refute evidence/facts someone on The Right lays down a Leftist will always resort to try to dodge, distort, distract, deny, and when all else fails Saul Alinsky style will start name-calling and pretend to have won the argument (like trying to play Chess against a Pigeon, it will just knock over all the pieces and strut around as if the superior).
ALSO discussion with Sardor Akhmedov about Economics, Business, Investing - "Political forces" aside.
Sardor is the managing partner at Jafton.com and an angel investor at Fathom Al. Sardor has experience running a software development agency working with Fortune 500 companies. As for his public speaking background, he's been the youngest speaker ever to perform on the biggest business forum called Synergy Global and the biggest podcast conference called Podcast Movement where he spoke among people like Mark Cuban, Gary Vee, and Richard Branson. He can share his experience bootstrapping tech businesses with minimum to no capital. 

Episode related pieces...
- https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/leftists-the-7-ds/   
- https://beforeitsnews.com/opinion/2018/12/when-they-cant-refute-your-points-they-resort-to-deflection-tactic-of-attempting-to-deligitimize-the-source-2461454.html 
- https://tinyurl.com/TheMighty200Targeted  
- S1E7 8/5 (BiDUMBnomics) buzzsprout.com/2210487/13353222-christitutionalist-politics-s1e7-bidenomics-working-alinsky-and-clowardandpiven-planned-usa-destruction-bideneconomy  
- S1E9 8/19 (BiDUMBnomics 2) https://www.buzzsprout.com/2210487/13433265-christitutionalist-politics-s1e9-bidenomics-part-2 

"ChristiTutionalist Politics" podcast (CTP)   
- CTP: tinyurl.com/ChristiTutionalist  
- CTP: tinyurl.com/ChristiTutionalistBook  
- SUBSCRIBE to CTP: tinyurl.com/SubscribeToCTP  
- FaithCasters Free Newsletter: tinyurl.com/FaithCasterNewsletterSignup  
TRANSCRIPT BONUS - BeforeItsNews.com "When they can't refute your points, they resort to deflection tactic of attempting to attack the Source (or Grammar, or word-choice, or Spelling, or whatever other distraction they can think..." piece 

Support the show

JLenardDetroit SUBSCRIBE-
Author, Blogger, Podcaster

[ChristiTutionalist Politics podcast begin Show intro]

Welcome to ChristiTutionalist Politics podcast a K a CTP in association with savage and filtered podcast The Liberty beacon calm and I am your host Joseph M Lenard and that's L E N A R D   CTP is your no must no fuss just me you And occasional gas type podcast as Graham Norton would say let's get out of the show 

[ChristiTutionalist Politics podcast begin opening - Segment 1] 

It's season 1, episode 17, The Leftist Seven D's, Dodge Deflect Distract the Door, Denied to Seam, Discret it, let me repeat on them, I mean, in case if I missed one of them, let me check my notes, make sure I got this right. Dodge Deflect Distract Distort Denied to Seam, Discret it. I think you will understand this. And before I go further, full disclosure and admission, normally I would have written my thelibertybeakin.com piece before recording the show. But this time, I'm actually recording this segment while only a rough draft bits and pieces of the article are together. So as we go through this, it will help shape the article. And also, this again, like last week, is going to be a shorter segment. So I highly urge you to go to thelibertybeakin.com. If you're seeing this in the YouTube or Rumble at J. Lunder Detroit behind the Seam sneak beat, it will be coming out Saturday. Look for it then. If you're hearing this via Buzzsprout, the article and season one episode 17 of Christitutionalist Politics will be both dropping Saturday morning, the same basic time. Go to thelibertybeakin.com after the show. Check out that article. There will be a whole lot more there that we don't discuss here. So as I've said before, the show and the articles are meant to compliment each other, not be duplication of each other. So it is important to do both. If you're not catching this the Saturday in October that it drops, then go to thelibertybeakin.com in the search field, put Joseph M. Leonard. Again, it's not Leonard, not French. It's Leonard without an O. That will then of course help you find all my articles, the most recent being at the top of the list so that it's easier to find. Search function there is great. If you're catching this midweek, my article will have rolled off the front page of thelibertybeakin.com and you can search for me. But the leftist seven D's, I already said that I'm gonna say them again. I'm trying to get this to catch obviously, right? I'm entering the seven leftist D's into the nomenclature. Dodge, deflect, distract, distort, deny, deceive, discredit, especially that last one. This is in part based on an older beforeitsnews.com where I am at J. Lerner Detroit. They're titled, when they can't refute your points, they engage in the usual distractions or deflections like blaming or trying to discredit Saul Olinsky ad-hum attack style, either the author, me in this case of a piece, or the site like beforeitsnews.com or thelibertybeakin.com that a piece may be on. And let's just be upfront and honest. Now beforeitsnews.com has everything from ultra left to ultra right. So it's not the site that matters. It is the whom do you read there that matters? Are you finding and reading legitimate sources that are fact based, evidence based, reality based versus left wing delusional unicorn spark? We wish it were this way as opposed to those of us who deal in reality, the way things are. We may not like all the time, certain things the way they are, but you can't address changing something unless you're willing to acknowledge the reality of the way something is. So it's not a source, thelibertybeakin.com is more a right leaning exclusive site. So if you're right leaning, you are more than likely going to find most of the people there you like and agree with. But there will be some that you find you can't get along with. You can't blame thelibertybeakin.com or beforeitsnews or even CNN or MSNBC.com for that. It's the people that are there. Now obviously CNN and MSNBC, their site is pure left wing propaganda and spin. And that's why we're talking about the leftist seven D's. They can't deal in reality based discussions. Instead, they either need to, are then from the notes. So I don't forget one of the seven D's. Dodge, deflect, distract, distort, deny, deceive or discredit others as they've attempted to do to me my whole life. You can go to tinyurl.com slash vmighty two hundred targeted. And that will take you to a beforeix news piece about the endless censorship engaged towards me and my writings. Including in 2016, Politico and Hillary Clinton literally targeting me and 199 other patriots out of the 300 million plus in America to start the whole Russian collusion delusion hysteria. That's right. It didn't start with Trump. They floated it with 200 Americans calling us either Russian agents or Russian bots. And they saw it was red meat to their base. And therefore then indeed went on to the whole steel dossier to create the Russian collusion and Trump is a Russian agent false narratives. That trial balloon, I was part of that trial balloon they floated at any rate. Again, I stated upfront this was just going to be a short segment. So I urge you to go to the Liberty beacon.com put Joseph M Leonard Leonard without a no in the search bar. Check out leftist seven D's. Dodge deflect, distract, distort, deny, deceive, discredit article for much more than we've covered here because I have a very important guest. I want to talk with Sardar Akmadev about economics, business and investing. Putting aside by economics and political pressures on economics, a Milton Friedman style, reality based economics versus a Paul Krugman Marxist. We wish it were this way. It's not that we pretended it is form of economics. Putting all that aside, we deal with business, investments, job markets, consumerism, freedoms. But again, trying to keep aside politics, but it is indeed a reality based discussion. Thank you. And now we will head into that interview. Take care of God bless. I am now joined by Sardar Akmadev and we're going to talk economics to some degree. Now, I know I've already had a couple of shows on BIDUMBnomics. This is not about that. 


[ChristiTutionalist Politics podcast begin opening - Segment 2]
 

JOSEPH M LENARD: I'm not looking to get into politics with Sardar here. But let's just have you go ahead and introduce yourself and your credentials.

SARDOR AKHMEDOV:  Absolutely, yep. So yeah, my name is Sardar Akmadev. I'm a tech entrepreneur. I co-own a agency called Jaffdan. We are a software and mobile app development agency specializing mobile more on mobile. So I've been in the US for nine years. I'm an immigrant, came here originally as a student and stayed here after college. Well, halfway through college actually ended up switching to business and dropping out, but that's, you know, and every story I ended up staying here again in my residency here. And yeah, it was one of the best decisions I made. I'm originally from Uzbekistan, Central Asia. It's a former Soviet Union country. So I speak Uzbek, which is similar to Turkish. And I speak Russian as well. English is my third language. And I'm also learning Spanish in a fun fact right now. Yeah, so hopefully that'll be my fourth language. What else? Yeah, that's a little bit about myself. No, I'm a tech enthusiast, AI enthusiast. You know, I love what I do. And my hobby is what I do around work actually.

JOSEPH M LENARD:  Yeah, well, I am a former IT guy. So I was a little closer for everyone in my audience. May not necessarily know or recognize that yet. But yeah, I mean, shocked to hear that somebody named Sardor is an immigrant.

SARDOR AKHMEDOV:  Right.

JOSEPH M LENARD:  Right. Right. Can you mean that's not a new typical American name? Right.

SARDOR AKHMEDOV:  Yeah, you have Sardor's left or right here.

JOSEPH M LENARD:  Just a little bit of fun. Just a little bit of fun. Things are so serious these days, you know, we got to keep a sense of humor.

SARDOR AKHMEDOV:  For sure. For sure.

JOSEPH M LENARD:  And the only thing overtly political I want here is that I will to say that I'm interested in talking to you from an investment perspective and entrepreneurial side of things. Obviously, you are more a free market guy as opposed to pro-capitalism, despite the fact that a Marxist term meant to be derogatory and incite people against free markets. But we are about freedom of association and freedom of property here, right? We are free to accept a job with a firm or not, rather than be told, you're going to do this and you're going to do it for that state-run company, right? We are free to invest our property, money is our property, infirms we so choose, and we are free to associate or not and spend our money with as a consumer the firms of our choice. So clearly, again, to avoid any further politics, I think it's safe to say you're not a Marxist, but talk to us about investment in startups in this day and age.

SARDOR AKHMEDOV:  Yep. That's right. That's a good question. So obviously, yeah, certainly a free market, pro-free market, is operating the free market and I like to stay in the free market. But as far as the investment goes, yeah, I wouldn't say I'm a professional investor, by no means would I try to be at least at this stage of my life, claim myself as a professional investor. I do that just to kind of park some of my cash in companies that I find interesting and I see potential in one of them being the Fathom AI, which is the AI no-takers actually that is on this call right now is built by that company. But my current, I guess, thesis investment is anything that I see big potential in that anything is that is very early stage, that I would like to invest in small checks, then I don't invest in anything huge. But that's my philosophy. But I try also not to do anything that's outside of my expertise, meaning I get a lot of outreach from people that ask me to invest in some of their businesses that are outside of my expertise, in the traditional business, like it could be retail, it could be anything healthcare and whatnot. And if I don't understand it, I can't just even evaluate it properly. Right. They could. It's not my company.

JOSEPH M LENARD:  Right. They could be great opportunities. But as they say, as an author, right about what you know, invest in what you know, you have a clue what's going on there, then it's not a leap of faith on a feeling, right?

SARDOR AKHMEDOV:  Exactly. Exactly. Yes. So I wouldn't go anywhere. I'm not an expert then.

JOSEPH M LENARD:  Yeah. Now, your tag says, at development agency. Now, of course, everything. I mean, I turned 61. So I'm, you know, pretty far away from Gen X, Gen Y, Gen Z, whatever. But I mean, everything is full. I had sprinklers put in the other day. And I chose one firm over another because I could control that system through my laptop, whereas the other firm that the names are unimportant, if you're looking at sprinklers, do your homework like anything, your body, do your homework is only phone at based. And it's like, no, I don't want to be doing all that crap on that little screen. But reality is everything moving that direction, right?

SARDOR AKHMEDOV:  100%. 100%. Yeah. So we're living in almost a mobile only world. You know, we used to call it a mobile first world, but that's definitely, you know, the case, but more so even in some cases, just the mobile only some of the apps. You don't even have a web version of it. You know, it's just mobile app, mobile app. Everything is mobile, these things, you know, so for sure. This, that's why we actually pivoted more to word about two years ago. We pivoted to focus only on mobile because we, before that we were doing everything general software development, web development, but now we're all mobile only focused because the market is just bigger and it helps to be more focused on mobile. Yeah. You know, some of these requirements.

JOSEPH M LENARD:  Yeah. Bigger market. And also it's easier if you don't have to develop for all kinds of different platforms and operating systems, right?

SARDOR AKHMEDOV:  Yep. Exactly.

JOSEPH M LENARD:  Yeah, because you know, if in the app world, you really kind of still only dealing, correct me if I'm wrong, Android operating and Apple operating or, well, Microsoft is there. Google's trying to also get into that space and potentially away from Android, but it's still probably less than Microsoft, Linux, Apple, or am I wrong?

SARDOR AKHMEDOV:  You mean like there's less types of platforms on the mobile than on the on the desktop? Yeah. Yeah, you're actually right. I mean, mainly on the, well, it kind of you're right and not right at the same time because on mobile, yes, you have two platforms, but desktop, even if you're whether you're on Mac or Windows right now, what's combining them both is actually what's making them platform agnostic is actually web because most of your applications these days are being built on web as opposed to native. So almost nobody's building native Mac or Windows applications. That's a very rare thing. I'll tell you in the history of our company actually we only had one project that we're building natively and that's for Linux for desktop just because this software is a kiosk machine like an ATM where it has to process the hardware information and the web cannot do that. So we had to do Linux, but that's a super rare case, you know, other than that, all of our projects are actually, you know, web based or mobile based. So what is actually more platform agnostic than mobile in that case?

JOSEPH M LENARD:  You read my mind with the next question and where I was going and to harken it back to my personal example of my sprinkler system. Indeed, it's browser based. It's not independent standalone software. So yeah, in a sense, that is the kind of one platform size fits all to go to. If you go browser based, the browser can run on any platform and your interface just has to work within and a lot of people I hate that they do this though. A lot of things though will say we are only optimized to work on Chrome and if you're using Firefox, Safari, Opera, we probably work but no guarantees, right?

SARDOR AKHMEDOV:  Right. But I would say though that's become a less of a problem as Google has actually won the war on a browser, I think because except Safari, all other browsers have come from to Chromium. So actually what you see now, there is no such thing as Firefox or even Microsoft Edge, which they tried to bring back the Internet Explorer didn't work out. All they are now are just front end shells for Chromium, which is owned by Chrome still. So even if you're using Edge or Opera or Firefox, all of them are actually on Chromium, same engine that the Google Chrome runs on. Everything except Safari, Apple is the only one that's holding up but everybody else has to conform because these guys, they control the web. I mean, Google is where your browsing starts, right? So they control the standards of the web in a lot of ways. So they actually intentionally bend the standards to their own liking so that these web standards, they don't work on other browsers except Chromium. So is there a way to take advantage of that unfair advantage?

JOSEPH M LENARD:  Right. Well, I'm here in the Detroit area, so to liking it to automotive, right? There's a lot of parts now that are, it doesn't matter if you're buying a Ford, GM, whatever Chrysler currently is, a Fiat, a Renault, a Volvo, a BMW, a Porsche. Some of those parts are pretty much all standardized coming from somebody else.

SARDOR AKHMEDOV:  Yeah, exactly, exactly. I mean, yeah, we're living in a global economy where everything is distributed and everybody takes things from each other, which is a beautiful thing about capitalism and globalization that we're able to offset the cost and get access to more resources and get access to more things that we can create co-create with others, you know?

JOSEPH M LENARD:  Yeah, and again, that's a good thing part of the free markets, right? The cream supposedly rises to the top. And if somebody makes a better widget than you're making that goes in your product, you're going to want that better widget to incorporate into your product. And like you alluded to as far as standards-wide, it's, you know, hate the word conformity, I'm going to use it here because in that sense, that sense of conformity creates a sense of stability.

SARDOR AKHMEDOV:  Oh, sure. 100%. Yeah, I mean, because you can then there's no unpredictable things.

JOSEPH M LENARD:  Yeah. Right. Right. It's all window dressing, like you said, like Firefox still has its basic window dressing interface, but and I didn't know this because I've been out of IT for a while, but Mozilla basically caved and they've got their window dressing on Google Chrome, you're saying.

SARDOR AKHMEDOV:  Yep. Yeah, 100%.

JOSEPH M LENARD:  Unfortunately, you know, yeah, some would say for better. Some would better in a way.

SARDOR AKHMEDOV:  Yeah.

JOSEPH M LENARD:  Because in a sense that eliminates a certain degree of competition, right? It's not good. Competition drives innovation.

SARDOR AKHMEDOV:  Exactly. Yes. To expand on that, actually, yeah, you're right. And the way, yeah, it makes it easier for developers to use launch standard of web and built for web, but I actually don't like where the browser like industry has been stuck on. It's chromium is actually very difficult to build on. Very, very difficult to build on from a developer standpoint. There's only been a few browser startups that have succeeded in building on it. Like one of them is Brave. Brave browser is what I use and it's amazing. Yeah. But extremely hard, like so hard to build your own browser because of all the complexity of the chromium and that actually stagnates the market and stops the innovation. Like I think browsers are outdated. There's so much more innovation that you could bring to browsers. Like, you know, by the very least, the lowest thing you could is like combining your tabs into one. Like some of the tabs you'll have like everybody struggles with this. I think like having 20 tabs open, you know, there's no categorization. There's no sporting of tabs. Guilty. Yeah. Everybody is. Yeah. See? Yeah. In fact, I'm like more than 20 tabs open right now.

JOSEPH M LENARD:  Yeah. But I'm looking at the bottom of my screen going across. I have five three different firebox windows open with multiple tabs in each window. I have four different Chrome windows open with multiple tabs in each of those windows. I also have two versions of edge running with multiple tabs and opera. Only one version of opera with a few tabs. And same with brave two brave windows with multiple because I multitask being for a variety. I'm always multitasking doing different things. And I want, you know, I don't want all of that in one thing being unmanageable. But to you will alluded to this off of what I said about the lack of competition breeds pushes people to compete to innovate to become that next thing. And then once a standard is reached, there becomes a degree of complacent. See, my word not yours, but I think that's what you were alluding to.

SARDOR AKHMEDOV:  Yeah, I agree. Complacency definitely is one of the outcomes of it. Unfortunately, that happens in the market. And the same thing, I think it was a lot of Google products that they have an entire advantage on like Google Maps also, not enough innovation. And you know, it's so hard to switch out like or HubSpot. I hate HubSpot CRM actually because it's so clunky. But guess what? I cannot switch out of it easily because I could migrate my data to other CRMs like this, close CRM, other CRMs. But the amount of integrations they have is the biggest. Everybody builds for HubSpot. There's a lot of consulting firms that cater around HubSpot. They have the winners advantage. It's like actually switching off a little bit to philosophical and religion. In the Bible, there's this verse that said, I think something along the lines of to those who have more will be given and to those who don't have more will be taken, something along those lines. And this is true in a lot of these big firms because they have so much and they get more. But that in terms creates complacency in their processes, you know, and they don't innovate.

JOSEPH M LENARD:  Yeah. Yeah. I wanted to say about browsers and I forgot. I'm always, I don't do a scripted thing, but I'm always doing notes, right? Gotta have notes. And I wrote down showing my age here, Netscape. I love Netscape that Microsoft stole in my opinion, allegedly. They did get a dollar in the court settlement. So I guess I don't have to say allegedly. I guess it was present in court, right? But I so would love to have Netscape back. Yeah. But anyway, and as far as Google Maps, I mean, that was definitely the go to at one time. But my GPS go to and everyone I know now is giving away from Google Maps and directions and GPS to get around Waze.

SARDOR AKHMEDOV:  Which is also owned by Google though.

JOSEPH M LENARD:  Oh, is it really? See, they're, ah-ha, they got me.

SARDOR AKHMEDOV:  Yeah. Yeah, for sure. I mean, Waze, I was thinking on the back of my head. Yeah, Waze innovated. They did a great job. But then it was acquired by Google. And again, yet again, hasn't innovated since they were acquired. No. You see, acquisitions are also deadly sometimes. Like Slack also hasn't innovated since it's been acquired by Salesforce. You know, when you become a part of this big corporation, like you're not much. Yeah, monopoly. Innovation and housing. Yeah.

JOSEPH M LENARD:  Because of the problem, because again, you eliminate competition and with innovation goes away. Exactly. That's what. And whenever I hear any merger or acquisition, my first thought is to be skeptical and opposed. Now, with every role, there's an exception, obviously. Sure. You know, you want economy of scale also though. Yep. Right?

SARDOR AKHMEDOV:  Yeah, more efficiency for sure.

JOSEPH M LENARD:  So address that.

SARDOR AKHMEDOV:  Yeah. For sure. Yeah, it is more efficient. I think M&As are actually a very good idea to grow. You know, like that's actually something that's top of mind for us right now. Like we want to do a lot of M&As for ourselves to grow our business, you know, on a small large scale, of course, we can't decline like huge companies, but some of our smaller competitors, you know, to roll them up. That's our goal.

JOSEPH M LENARD:  Absolutely. Acquisition is a lot easier than complete startup.

SARDOR AKHMEDOV:  Oh, 100%. That was the biggest relation. Basically, acquiring a stable business gives you so much more advantage over taking your risk. I mean, it's simple stats, right? Like new businesses, 75% of small businesses, I think they called down within the first three years, I think, was something like that versus stable businesses. The longer something has been in existence, the longer it is likely to exist even more, I think it's called the Lindy effect, actually. It applies to everything that's non-perishable. The longer it is something that has been in existence, the more longer it is likely to exist.

JOSEPH M LENARD:  Okay. Well, as I set up front, my show is not a long one. I just recently started it, so I can't expect people to listen for an hour, two hours, three hours. So I don't even try to push the envelope and full disclosure, so everyone understands. I was reluctant at first to even have Sardar come on, right? Because we are a more Christitutionalist, politics-oriented. And as I said, had done Bidenomics episodes, but the more I thought about it, the more important I thought it was to bring Sardar on, avoid the politics, talk economics, investment, business in general, without that dichotomy. So thank you for coming on. What else would you like to impart before we go?

SARDOR AKHMEDOV:  No, I really enjoyed it. Thanks for having me on this podcast. And yeah, to me, what I love about these podcasts is being able to talk to different topics. I mean, I enjoy talking to Joe, having a conversation, casual conversations like this, they're not scripted, they're the best for me. And at a great time, I hope if whoever listened got some new information for themselves, got some inspiration for themselves. And I really hope to come back again in the future and talk more about some of the new updates in life. And if you found this valuable, reach out to me with any questions if you want. I'm more active on LinkedIn than anywhere else. So I'll let you get my name on Twitter.

JOSEPH M LENARD:  I'm buying where I was going next. Now, those who are seeing this video behind the scenes sneak peek @JLenardDetroit YouTube or Rumble, but this is a mostly audio podcast. So verbally indeed, tell us where people can find and reach out to you.

SARDOR AKHMEDOV:  Yep. It's all socials. It's interesting to hear on Rumble. I should probably get it under as well. But that's probably the only social network I'm not on right now. But yeah, find me anywhere on socials most active on LinkedIn. I'm sort of the Oric meadow of my first and last name. Search for me. You should probably see me. My company name is Jaffan.com. If you need a mobile application, come and acquire to us, we can help you out. And if you're in Florida, we have weekly AI events every Tuesday in our office that you can come in at 10. So yeah, I really enjoyed being here. Thanks for having me on.



[ChristiTutionalist Politics podcast begin Show outro]


Thank you for having tuned into Chrystitutionalist politics show Please tune into savages and filtered podcasts of which I am a co-host and be sure to check out more about today's discussion at the Liberty beacon calm where my articles drop every Saturday in addition to seeing the corresponding the Liberty beacon calm piece referenced in the episode of ChristiTutionalist podcast see to the show transcript on podcast platforms that provide access to it like bus bro at tinyurl.com/ChristiTutionalist for additional bonus material therein the transcript. Thank you. Take care. God bless



Transcription Services above from: https://converter.app/



------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


S1E17 SHOW NOTES  ( listen (Sat Oct 14 2023 and thereafter) at: http://buzzsprout.com/2210487 )...
ChristiTutionalist Politics (S1E17) "Leftists and the 7 D's"
Topic TheLibertyBeacon.com "Leftists and the 7 D's" piece! 
When a Leftist cannot refute evidence/facts someone on The Right lays down a Leftist will always resort to try to dodge, distort, distract, deny, and when all else fails Saul Alinsky style will start name-calling and pretend to have won the argument (like trying to play Chess against a Pigeon, it will just knock over all the pieces and strut around as if the superior).
ALSO discussion with Sardor Akhmedov about Economics, Business, Investing - "Political forces" aside.
Sardor is the managing partner at Jafton.com and an angel investor at Fathom Al. Sardor has experience running a software development agency working with Fortune 500 companies. As for his public speaking background, he's been the youngest speaker ever to perform on the biggest business forum called Synergy Global and the biggest podcast conference called Podcast Movement where he spoke among people like Mark Cuban, Gary Vee, and Richard Branson. He can share his experience bootstrapping tech businesses with minimum to no capital. 

Episode related pieces...
- https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/leftists-the-7-ds/   
- https://beforeitsnews.com/opinion/2018/12/when-they-cant-refute-your-points-they-resort-to-deflection-tactic-of-attempting-to-deligitimize-the-source-2461454.html 
- https://tinyurl.com/TheMighty200Targeted  
- S1E7 8/5 (BiDUMBnomics) buzzsprout.com/2210487/13353222-christitutionalist-politics-s1e7-bidenomics-working-alinsky-and-clowardandpiven-planned-usa-destruction-bideneconomy  
- S1E9 8/19 (BiDUMBnomics 2) https://www.buzzsprout.com/2210487/13433265-christitutionalist-politics-s1e9-bidenomics-part-2 

"ChristiTutionalist Politics" podcast (CTP)   
- CTP: tinyurl.com/ChristiTutionalist  
- CTP long-form description: tinyurl.com/ChristiTutionalistPodcast 
- CTP: tinyurl.com/ChristiTutionalistBook  
- TLB articles: thelibertybeacon.com/?s=Joseph+M+Lenard  
- SUBSCRIBE to CTP: tinyurl.com/SubscribeToCTP  
- FaithCasters Free Newsletter: tinyurl.com/FaithCasterNewsletterSignup  
- Join Faithcaster (Podcaster or Guest):  tinyurl.com/FaithCasterConnections  
- Broadcast your thoughts w/ buzzsprout: tinyurl.com/BuzzsproutSignup   
- CTP Official playlist: tinyurl.com/CTPMusicPlaylist  
- Joseph M Lenard - linktr.ee/jlenarddetroit  (JosephMLenard.us /\ TerrorStrikes.info/interviews)  
(S1E17 Audio: 36m 35s, Sat Oct 14 2023)
TRANSCRIPT BONUS - BeforeItsNews.com "When they can't refute your points, they resort to deflection tactic of attempting to attack the Source (or Grammar, or word-choice, or Spelling, or whatever other distraction they can think..." piece 

In addition to seeing corresponding TheLibertyBeacon piece referenced in episodes of CTP, see too Show transcript on Podcast platforms that provide access to it (like buzzsprout (tinyurl.com/ChristiTutionalist)) for addl bonus material  there-in.



---------------------------------------------------------------------------------


BONUS MATERIAL... [ BeforeItsNews.com "When they can't refute your points, they resort to deflection tactic of attempting to attack the Source (or Grammar, or word-choice, or Spelling, or whatever other distraction they can think..." piece - https://beforeitsnews.com/opinion/2018/12/when-they-cant-refute-your-points-they-resort-to-deflection-tactic-of-attempting-to-deligitimize-the-source-2461454.html ]


When they can't refute your points, they resort to deflection tactic of attempting to attack the Source (or Grammar, or word-choice, or Spelling, or whatever other distraction they can think...

Thursday, December 20, 2018 22:42

Article shortcut: https://tinyurl.com/NothingButDeflections
aka: The Alinsky tactics of the Left

[New book from Joseph M. Lenard TERROR STRIKES:
http://terrorstrikes.info / http://terrorstrikes.info/synopsis / http://terrorstrikes.info/about-the-book]

September 2023 note: an updated version of this will be coming soon (likely in October) to TheLibertyBeacon.com – ”Leftist’s and the 7 D’s”… “Dodge, Deflect, Distract, Distort, Deceive, Discredit, Deny”

Whether it be BeforeItsNews or any Internet site (even established MSM sites) that people use to anchor their Articles, when they can’t defeat your arguments they try to deligitimize the Source location (or, in general, can’t refute provided facts directly maybe even not shared via an Article – out of desperation SLANDER, the last resort of the Scoundral – my just launch baseless ad hominem Alinskly style attacks (DuckDuckGo search him if you are clueless who he is and the Fascicrats’ (related: http://tinyurl.com/Fascicrats) never-ending use of his “Rules For Radicals” outline))…

[ Sat Feb 19 2022 brief update: brief companion article added:
Getting FLAK? You know you're over the target!!!
/opinion-conservative/2022/02/as-the-saying-goes-incoming-flak-clear-indication-youre-over-the-target-you-know-youre-effective-when-they-start-trying-to-smear-you-again-3619573.html ]

Any given “PIECE” depends upon the CREDIBILITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL AUTHOR not necessarily the Platform on which it is posted! This particular post, as are many of my pieces, are either posted or cross-posted on #B4IN Platform (yes, I am well aware of, and steer clear of (several, discredited, out-right) MORONS that do indeed also post here – they have nothing to do with MY FACTUAL POSTS and I nothing to do with their GARBAGE) but the whole Platform becomes a convenient DODGE/DEFLECTION when a #Libtard cannot refute my FACTUAL and/or REASONED THOUGHTS (not FEELINGS) pieces!

Ever notice how people who are incapable of putting together any coherent refutation of what someone says in an Article have to resort to the usual tactic of #deflection by trying to attack the source location (or inpune the grammar or something else) of any such Article?!?! Often, they probably hadn’t even bothered to read what it is they insist has to be invalid (just, cuz, you know, they don’t like the Source) after just reading the headline and it upset their feelings and therefore try to keep others from engaging in actual thought and discussion about the content of said Article!

And, Heaven forbid, don’t accidentally spell a word incorrectly… Some will be so enraged at your words but know they cannot refute them but be unable to resist to lash-out and attack the incorrect spelling… If you ever do, and the Trolls respond – reply: ” Note that there is always someone that knows they cannot refute the SUBSTANCE of the words of something, but is so enraged they cannot resist having to attack an accidental incorrect spelling of a word instead to try and be dismissive of the overall thoughts/points/substance they know to be valid and therefore deem “dangerous” if others were to read them that they have to try and convince others to not read said words! lol “

And, now you have this Article to share and bolster any responses you choose to make versus their desperate dismissive assaults!

———————————————————————

April 2023 update: Like I say in http://beforeitsnews.com/books/2022/12/how-to-write-a-book-and-get-it-published-want-to-really-influence-discussions-publish-your-thoughts-its-easier-now-than-ever-2551972.html you don’t want to be a Grammar-NAZI online, but you want one editing your book (see the part about Mallies Sports Bar and Grill)!!!

———————————————————————

TERROR STRIKES book … 

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: 
Joseph M. Lenard (a/k/a: JLenardDetroit)
Born 1962. Lifelong resident Wyandotte Michigan.
Former information technology professional.
Political issues blogger/vlogger/speaker/writer.

more: http://TerrorStrikes.info 

———————————————————————

Appreciate this or other Joseph M. Lenard pieces?
Joseph M Lenard is on @buymeacoffee! 🎉
You can support by buying a coffee ☕️ here — 
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/jlenarddetroit 

———————————————————————



END BONUS MATERIAL... [ BeforeItsNews.com "When they can't refute your points, they resort to deflection tactic of attempting to attack the Source (or Grammar, or word-choice, or Spelling, or whatever other distraction they can think..." piece - https://beforeitsnews.com/opinion/2018/12/when-they-cant-refute-your-points-they-resort-to-deflection-tactic-of-attempting-to-deligitimize-the-source-2461454.html ]


People on this episode