CTP (S3E114) Drop-Dead Gorgeous vs. Terminally Cute: The Beauty Theory Episode

CTP (S3E114) Drop-Dead Gorgeous vs. Terminally Cute: The Beauty Theory Episode
Exploring more of the fascinating intersection of Activism, Community Engagement, Faith / Religion, Human Nature, Politics, Social Issues, and beyond   
Beauty truly lies in the eye of the beholder, and our perception of attractiveness spans across different categories that explain why people have varied responses to the same individuals.
• Categories of beauty include "drop-dead gorgeous," "terminally cute" like Emma Watson, "intriguing beauty" like Emma Stone, and "plain Jane, kind of pretty"
• Inner beauty can elevate someone from a 6.5 to an 8, while inner ugliness can drop a 10 to a 5
• The Sidney Sweeney controversy demonstrates how politics affects our perception of beauty
• The American Eagle jeans campaign with Sweeney sparked unfounded controversy linking "genes" wordplay to eugenics
• Political polarization increases hatred and division that we must overcome
• We need to look beyond superficial differences and focus on being better to each other  

Chapters

• 0:38 Welcome to CTP Season 3
• 2:01 Beauty Categories Theory Explained
• 7:03 Inner Beauty vs. Outer Appearance
• 10:09 American Eagle Controversy Breakdown
• 19:54 Politics of Hate and Final Thoughts
• 21:46 Closing and Show Information

Transcript

CTP S3E114 before Audio edits 22m 50s...
CTP S3E114 SHOW NOTES ( listen (Sat Aug 23 2025 and thereafter) at: 
https://www.buzzsprout.com/2210487/episodes/17636525-ctp-s3e114-drop-dead-gorgeous-vs-terminally-cute-the-beauty-theory-episode )... 
Exploring more of the fascinating intersection of Activism, Community Engagement, Faith / Religion, Human Nature, Politics, Social Issues, and beyond   
See buzzsprout Transcript for fuller/extended Show Notes (inc. related links) and Transcript Bonus  
Transcript Bonus: Beauty - Eye Of The Beholder BeforeItsNews piece    
CTP (S3E114) Drop-Dead Gorgeous vs. Terminally Cute: The Beauty Theory Episode
Exploring more of the fascinating intersection of Activism, Community Engagement, Faith / Religion, Human Nature, Politics, Social Issues, and beyond   
Beauty truly lies in the eye of the beholder, and our perception of attractiveness spans across different categories that explain why people have varied responses to the same individuals.
• Categories of beauty include "drop-dead gorgeous," "terminally cute" like Emma Watson, "intriguing beauty" like Emma Stone, and "plain Jane, kind of pretty"
• Inner beauty can elevate someone from a 6.5 to an 8, while inner ugliness can drop a 10 to a 5
• The Sidney Sweeney controversy demonstrates how politics affects our perception of beauty
• The American Eagle jeans campaign with Sweeney sparked unfounded controversy linking "genes" wordplay to eugenics
• Political polarization increases hatred and division that we must overcome
• We need to look beyond superficial differences and focus on being better to each other  

Episode related pieces...
- corresponding direct B4IN article link: https://beforeitsnews.com/pictures/2025/08/beauty-indeed-in-eye-of-beholder-2499310.html (general link: https://tinyurl.com/JLDArticles)
- BTS/SP Video of this episode link: https://old.bitchute.com/video/m2psAAwnQOpo/ (see JLenardDetroit BitChute,Brighteon,DailyMotion,Rumble,YouTube, channels)   

"ChristiTutionalist Politics" podcast (CTP) 
[ Some CTP episodes contain additional/separate Copyright materials, Used With Permission ]  
- CTP: tinyurl.com/ChristiTutionalist  
- CTP long-form description: tinyurl.com/ChristiTutionalistPodcast 
- SUBSCRIBE to CTP: tinyurl.com/SubscribeToCTP  
- Get great Promotional Releases via: tinyurl.com/GreatPRPieces    
- CTP Official playlist: tinyurl.com/CTPMusicPlaylist   
- Transcription Services by: Converter.App  
- Joseph M Lenard - linktr.ee/jlenarddetroit  (JosephMLenard.us /\ TerrorStrikes.info/interviews)  
- other podcasts with Joseph M Lenard (partial listing): https://ivy.fm/tag/joseph-m-lenard and https://www.podchaser.com/creators/joseph-m-lenard-107ten9NBc/appearances  
(CTP S3E114 Audio: 22m 19s, Sat Aug 23 2025) 
[ Stomping Rock Four Shots - Alex Grohl and Little Polish Genie - Ted Lenard Jr. & The Polka Kings; Used With Permission Under License ]  

some "Behind-the-Scenes" Video versions found via DailyMotion, BitChute, Brighteon, and mainly...    
YouTube: youtube.com/@jlenarddetroit1082/videos      
Rumble: rumble.com/user/JLenardDetroit   

See too Show transcript on buzzsprout (tinyurl.com/ChristiTutionalist) for addl bonus material  there-in.

------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------

Transcription Services below from: https://converter.app/

[ChristiTutionalist Politics podcast begin Show intro]

Welcome to ChristiTutionalist Politics podcast aka CTP in association with TheLibertyBeacon.com and I am your host Joseph M Lenard and that's L E N A R D   CTP is your no muss no fuss just me you And occasional guest type podcast as Graham Norton would say let's get on with the show 

[ChristiTutionalist Politics podcast - Segment 1] 

Hello everyone, welcome to season 3 episode 114.
Of course, I have multiple hundred episodes.
The numbering of the, that season 3, 114 is now the normal Saturday monologues since the beginning of the show in 2023.
The guest specials during the week, indeed, I run as specials so they don't run up that number.
I don't play those games to try to make it look like, oh I've been around forever and I've got a pavilion, I don't play those games at any rate.
Thank you and shout out to Rusty's dad and Panther 1890 on True Social.
I have been talking about the topic of this show.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder for decades.
I've never officially put it into print anywhere, so I'm doing a show officially on it so that then too,
yes, I'll probably run this through a transcriber or the galaxy AI video summarizer so that I can port it over to beforetsnews.com and my sub backstage.
And probably even savage done filtered dot com in the blogs there, blog spot.
I'll probably blast this everywhere.
Because indeed, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
What brought this out?
Well, let me go back to the screen to True Social.
Panther 1890 said Good grief.
That's the best left can garner double question mark.
My pit ball, pit ball, aka Rusty's dad quoted that with I will pick Cindy Sweeney any day with her without makeup.
Okay, Cindy Sweeney aside, and again, no, if you look at my shirt for the book of Kennedy for those looking behind the scenes, you can also check video exclusive bit you bright on daily motion in France rumble in YouTube.
I have a short three minute video about no, this is not Cindy Sweeney, but thank you for asking gives me a chance to talk about my book because the shirt, the AI generated image of Kennedy resemble Cindy Sweeney a bit.
And I lost my train of thought now.
But anyway, indeed, this feeds into that whole thing on True Social, why I'm doing this now beauty indeed in the eye of the beholder.
We all see beauty kind of differently.
So it's time I officially put my theory of why that is indeed a day computes as a theory, right?
One guy could look at a girl or a girl can look at a guy and think right for men, there's different categories to some of the same categories will apply.
Like before I go into female beauty, back in the day, remember to wonderful life.
There are a lot of people, a lot of women found Jimmy Stewart.
I would call them kind, I would put as a male category a dorky beauty.
A kind of a dorky, sunny looking guy that a lot of females found attractive.
Today, mainly talking male towards what is beautiful in a female.
And indeed, I printed the response I made to Rusty's dad and Panther 1890 over on True Social.
I'll try to remember to put the screenshot of this image in later.
Or I always forget my categories, which is why I needed to write them down indeed, right?
I say I have established now for sure, bah, bah, bah, bah, bah, bah, bah, bah, bah, bah, bah, bah, bah, bah, bah, bah, there are categories like drop dead gorgeous.
That's a category that most men find a particular woman, drop dead gorgeous.
I'm not going to name many names.
You decide what names you think may fit in that category, right?
I'm going to be permanently cute.
And I'll explain shortly, intriguing beauty.
I put like a Stevie Nicks, a Pat Benatar, and others in that category, and I'll explain that further.
And even a plain Jane kind of pretty category, right?
And I'm sure I've already forgotten several of my categories that I've come up with over the years, because I've never officially put it down in writing or in a recording for playback.
But I like to say for two of the categories, let's think about that.
It's the tale of two Emmas.
All right, you have Emma Watson, who when her hair is short, especially has a perpetual younger look, even into her aging years now.
I mean, she's only what in her twenties?
Oh, no thirties. It's the most. I don't know. I don't follow her career closely.
I wasn't ever a big Potter movie fan or book fan.
So anyway, Emma Watson, permanently cute.
I put her in that category.
A lot of people, a lot of male men indeed think she's beautiful, right?
Turmally cute. She's got a perpetual youthful cute appearance, in my opinion.
And indeed, that's what I responded on through social about Sydney Sweeney.
I think she's cute. Not gorgeous.
But with you on what you said, look, I also.
PG-13 now category, right?
I also went on to say, let's be honest, her body helps her overall rating since, you know,
all through time we've been putting numbers on the sex appeal of women, right?
A whole other show to discuss the sexualization and objectification of women.
Whole other story, that being a given still thing on this planet, why I'm doing this here.
So her body helps her overall rating, so to speak, go up from like a 6.5 to an 8.
Okay, if you want to call me rude and crude and sexist for saying that, go right ahead,
right?
I'm just dealing in the real world as it exists and these things, these kind of rankings and
the objectification of women is a thing.
I'm just dealing with that reality here.
So I consider Sydney cute, not gorgeous.
Emma Watson, terminally cute.
Emma Stone, very different looking than Emma Watson.
And intriguing beauty, I put right, her face is very different from what would be in a
drop did gorgeous category, but pretty nonetheless.
So all right, am I digging myself a hole here?
Is this a topic I should not gone into on a Christian show?
But again, the show dealing in reality of the world as it is not as we'd like it.
It would be nice if at any rate, it is what it is.
I've said what I've said.
I'm not taking any of it back.
I'm just giving you my real as a worldly guy perspective here as to what goes on out there,
right?
At any rate.
It's rule of whole stop digging, right?
So I'm going to stop digging my hole here and indeed go over.
Beauty does indeed lie in the eye of the beholder, male or female.
It's not as if women don't objectify a bunch of men too, right?
Look at a George Clooney who, you know, I don't like personally as a person because,
you know, he's a communist, right?
As opposed to this show being about biblical community, right?
But men do it towards women, women do it objectification of men, for men too.
So it's not like I'm not dealing in reality here.
I'm dealing in the world as it exists here.
So to recap and to wrap it up, this is going to be a short one.
I could go much longer, but as they say, just stop digging the hole, right?
Because drop dead gorgeous, terminally cute, intriguing beauty and even plain Jane kind
of pretty.
There's something for everyone, right?
Come bring to mind, speaking of the maybe if things weren't this way, life could be better.
And in some respects, it would be think of the movie shallow how, right?
The Jack Black where he always objectified all women and what was it that someone put
a spell on him or God sapped him or whatever.
I mean that movie is so old now to where he saw inner beauty rather than exterior beauty.
And that matters.
Like let me go back to let me change it from her body helps her overall rate, so to speak,
from a six point five to an eight.
Inner beauty also can take a six and a half to an eight, but it can also take a 10 to
a five the inner ugly, so to speak.
Like women, you know, some men might look great on the outside, but are ugly on the
inside and that certainly detracts from what you would call their handsomeness, right?
Same with women.
Some women might be considered drop dead gorgeous 10 on the outside, but then opens her mouth
in that inner ugly fuse and she quickly drops to a five.
So indeed, I am going to wrap this up now.
Not quite a topic you would expect for this show, but again, this show does not always
deal in Christianity or politics.
This is a issue of reality and having come across all this Sydney Sweeney stuff and the
hate she gets from some less than attractive folks will just say makes it a topic do sure
of the time, right?
I'm sorry.
I'm dealing in the news.
What the what's happening in the news and Sydney Sweeney is getting in some respects
from the right, maybe a little more love than she deserves and certainly getting a heck
of a lot of hate from the worldly communists because it's been outed at that she's a registered
Republican and she's on board with Magga.
So the Trump arrangement syndrome is certainly factoring in here too.
And let me the American Eagle.
I ran into someone at an eatery the other day.
I will extend this a little bit.
Who have tedious just never ending to right American Eagle Sydney Sweeney and the jeans
as which yes, you could find a video exclusive show at Bit Shoe Friday on Daily Motion rumble
YouTube also on the whole American Eagle ad campaign dust up this idiocy of all what's
eugenics.
No, it's actual DNA science real science.
Not your leftist demo KKK rats Margaret Sanger eugenics nonsense that the Nazis bought into
and picked up.
It is you on the left that created that fake science of eugenics.
The ad is talking a play on G E N E S which we all either have good DNA or not.
Like me, I wouldn't say I've got great jeans.
My family genealogy has a history on my dad's side of heart issues.
It's why I have on May 1st.
Haver, heartfelt replacement surgery.
I wish my jeans I hope and pray most other people have better jeans actually than I.
And that's coming from someone of German descent.
I don't buy into the eugenics nonsense.
Not all Germans do.
The Nazi idiocy.
You on the left are the Nazis that created the eugenics.
But yet you're trying to call Sydney Sweeney a Nazi for her good jeans G E N E S versus
J E A N S joke play on words there and American Eagle.
The PDF person at the eatery the other day.
Oh, did you hear American Eagle is dropped by Sydney Sweeney.
So person solely responsible for tanking American.
They have record sales, but her TDS has to mean she I'm pointing to my shirt.
That's not Sydney Sweeney.
I already told you that.
But yeah, trying to equate Sydney Sweeney and American Eagle jeans with Trump because Sydney
voted for Trump.
The two don't go hand in hand.
They are separate issues, but her and her TDS is trying to revel in the thought that American
Eagle dipped 8% one day while of course because she doesn't understand the economics and how
the stock market works.
People bought in some of them decided to then sell after it gone up 15% then another 10%.
To take a profit.
So then they dipped 8%.
It's still at the time of this recording up.
26.5% over last month.
But no, oh, blinders focus on the 8% drop.
We can't look at the overall actual chart.
People people.
So anyway, now I've touched on several issues.
Thought that I needed to go under the American Eagle, right?
Record sales.
Their stock is still way up.
They're doing great.
They're loving it.
Sydney Sweeney, you know, put them way into the stratosphere on the maps as far as gene
sales go.
And this indeed does tie to beauty is in the eye of the holder.
I think she's cute.
I don't think she's gorgeous.
But hey, whatever floats your ball.
And the jeans has has nothing to do with eugenics.
And indeed the sex cells, right?
Again, back to object.
I'm who I can't say that objectification of women, right?
Pat Benatar, I mentioned, right?
In the intriguing beauty category, she eventually came out with a song called Stop Using Sex as
a Weapon.
Well, Pat, I'm sorry, I've got to call you out for your hypocrisy.
For years, you let the record company convince you and Neil to play down your relationship
to give the illusion that you were available so they could use your sex to sell albums.
And you were fine with that.
But years later, all of a sudden, stop using sex as a weapon.
Well, you're a hypocrite for what you allowed for years to help sell your music, your albums.
So now I've really tied a whole bunch of stuff into this.
They do all relate.
I am going to do now.
Thank you all for those of you who managed to make it through this whole show of rambling
of related topics.
Take care.
God bless.
Be good to each other.
Can we please be better to each other?
And that's part of the book.
Oh, this left is hate.
Hate hate hate Trump derangement syndrome.
Hate that people that hates in people or people that hate rich people, blacks and white,
whites and heat spots.
You know, this, there is none more hateful, spiteful, envious, jealous, covellous than
a person on the left of the political spectrum.
And this has got to stop.
Thank you all.
Take care.
God bless.
Thank you for having me.
Thank you for having tuned in for a Christopher



[ChristiTutionalist Politics podcast begin Show outro]

Thank you for having tuned into ChristiTutionalist Politics show. Please be sure to check out more about today's discussion at TheLibertyBeacon.com where my articles drop every Saturday in addition to seeing the corresponding TheLibertyBeacon.com piece referenced in the episode of ChristiTutionalist podcast see to the show transcript on podcast platforms that provide access to it like buzzsprout at tinyurl.com/ChristiTutionalist for additional bonus material therein the transcript. Thank you. Take care. God bless


[Like, Share, Subscribe]

Like and subscribe to ChristiTutionalist Politics Podcast. Share episodes. We need your help to grow the show. 


Transcription Services above from: https://converter.app/


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



BONUS MATERIAL BELOW from:  TheLibertyBeacon "Beauty - Eye Of The Beholder" article   [See original piece at: https://beforeitsnews.com/pictures/2025/08/beauty-indeed-in-eye-of-beholder-2499310.html , for referenced links, images, and embedded videos.]





Pardon for posting this in PICTURES, but not really other B4IN category as this has to do with LOOKS!


[following from Galaxy AI YouTube Video Summarizer]
Exploring the Concept of Beauty: A Deep Dive into Perception and Reality
By Albert Harmon Published August 8, 2025 4 min read Lifestyle

In this episode of ChristiTutionalist Politics, Joseph M. Lenard discusses the subjective nature of beauty, categorizing it into various types and exploring societal perceptions. He reflects on public figures like Sydney Sweeney and Emma Watson, and how inner beauty can influence perceptions of attractiveness.



The conversation also touches on the objectification of women and the impact of political views on public perception.



CTP is a straightforward podcast where it's just me, you, and occasionally a guest. Thank you for tuning in.



Today, we are diving into a topic I have contemplated for decades: "Beauty is in the Eye of the Beholder."



This episode marks Season 3, Episode 114 of the podcast. I have been discussing the subjective nature of beauty for years but have never officially documented my thoughts. Today, I aim to articulate my theory on why beauty is perceived differently by everyone.



The discussion was sparked by a comment from Panther 1890 on Truth Social, questioning the attractiveness of certain public figures. This led to a broader conversation about how we perceive beauty and the categories we create around it.


Categories of Beauty


I have established several categories to classify beauty, particularly in women. Here are the main categories I have identified:

Drop Dead Gorgeous: This category includes women who are universally considered stunning. The specifics of who fits into this category can vary based on personal opinion.
Terminally Cute: This category features women who possess a youthful and endearing appearance. For example, Emma Watson is often seen as terminally cute, especially with her short hair, which gives her a perpetual youthful look.
Intriguing Beauty: This category includes women whose beauty is unique and captivating, even if they do not fit the traditional standards of attractiveness. Emma Stone is an example of someone who falls into this category.
Plain Jane Pretty: This category encompasses women who may not stand out but possess a certain charm and attractiveness.
Elegant beauty.

The Role of Inner Beauty


While discussing these categories, it is essential to recognize that inner beauty plays a significant role in how we perceive attractiveness. A person's character and personality can elevate their perceived beauty or diminish it. For instance, someone who may be considered a 10 in looks can drop to a 5 if their personality is unpleasant. Conversely, someone who is a 6 can rise to an 8 with a kind and engaging personality.


The Impact of Public Figures


The conversation also touched on public figures like Sydney Sweeney, who has received both admiration and criticism for her looks and political views. Some may find her attractive, while others may not, and this perception is often influenced by societal standards and personal biases.



Sweeney's situation highlights how beauty can be politicized, especially when public figures express their political beliefs. Her support for certain political ideologies has led to polarized opinions about her attractiveness, showcasing how beauty is not just a personal perception but also a societal construct.



Objectification and Reality
The discussion of beauty inevitably leads to the topic of objectification. Both men and women engage in objectifying others based on physical appearance. This reality is often uncomfortable but is a part of how society operates. It is crucial to acknowledge that while beauty can be subjective, the objectification of individuals based on their looks is a pervasive issue that affects both genders.



Conclusion


In conclusion, beauty is indeed in the eye of the beholder. We all have different perceptions and categories that influence how we view attractiveness. Whether it is through the lens of societal standards or personal experiences, beauty remains a complex and multifaceted topic.

As we navigate discussions about beauty, it is essential to consider both external and internal factors that contribute to our perceptions. Let us strive to be kinder and more understanding towards one another, recognizing that everyone has their unique perspective on beauty.

Thank you for joining me in this exploration of beauty. If you enjoyed this episode, please like and subscribe to the Constitutionalist Politics podcast and share it with others. Take care and God bless.


[above from GalaxyAI VidSumm]



RELATED:
https://savagedunfiltereddotcom.wordpress.com/2025/08/05/left-wont-let-it-go-american-eagle-update/


IMAGE below from TruthSocial, and my response to the MEME (remember, B4IN moves articles to ARCHIVES after 1 year time and ALL images get stripped as they try save Server space)...


A good #MEME, Thx 4 sharing,
related...
I gotta say, despite my LOVE for #SydneySweeney CUZ she actually has a FUNCTIONAL #BRAIN*... I think She is #CUTE not #GORGEOUS. But, though, as I discuss in following, her #BODY (us Straight Adult #MALES actually admire such) raises her in many minds, IMO, from 6.5 to 8. LOL
more in...
Beauty (indeed) In Eye Of Beholder...
Pictures | Aug 08 2025 15:40
[I put the THEORY to SOUND #THESIS TEST]
//beforeitsnews/pictures/2025/08/beauty-indeed-in-eye-of-beholder-2499310html
https://beforeitsnews.com/pictures/2025/08/beauty-indeed-in-eye-of-beholder-2499310.html

* unlike a #CharlizeTheron who used to be a 8.5 but as she opens her mouth more and more and the inner #IDIOT and #UGLY spews forth, that causes her to drop to a 5.







BONUS MATERIAL ABOVE from:  TheLibertyBeacon "Beauty - Eye Of The Beholder" article   [See original piece at: https://beforeitsnews.com/pictures/2025/08/beauty-indeed-in-eye-of-beholder-2499310.html , for referenced links, images, and embedded videos.]