A Psychologist looks at Scripture
In this 8-10 minute podcast, I as a psychologist and a priest use my training and skills to examine the Gospels. I will present alternative interpretations and insights into the meaning of Scripture for men and women in the 21st century.
I can be reached at peter.dohertyomi@gmail.com.
A Psychologist looks at Scripture
Mt 4.1-11 Feb 22-26 Stones to Bread: When Desire Hijacks Your Divine Calling
Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.
In today’s podcast we focus on Matthew’s account of Jesus completing 40 days in the desert. It is not clear whether Matthew is drawing a connection between Jesus’ time in the desert and the Israelites wandering around in the desert for 40 years. What is noteworthy is that we have Jesus being tempted by the devil. The temptations give us insight into the heart and mission of Jesus.
The first one is the devil suggesting that Jesus turn the stones into bread. Jesus is clearly hungry. He had fasted for a long time. It would make sense, at least superficially, to use his power to regain his strength. Jesus is not seduced by this reasoning and realized the ends did not justify the means.
Greetings and welcome to my regular listeners and to those joining us for the first time—thank you for being here!
I'm Peter Doherty, a Catholic priest and psychologist, passionate about the rich relationship between psychology and spirituality. For too long, these two fields have eyed each other with mistrust, which is ironic: healthy psychology strengthens our spirituality, and true spirituality, grounded in solid psychological health, becomes a profound source of meaning and resilience.
In this short podcast, I explore the Gospel reading for the coming week. The podcast is designed as a resource for preachers preparing their homilies, sermons as well as for anyone teaching or studying Scripture. I draw from published articles in psychology and Scripture scholarship, and I provide anthropological background to help put the Gospel in context.
I see the Scriptures as primarily focused on guiding us in faith and spirituality. The biblical writers understood history differently from modern historians, and these texts are richly multi-layered—there's always more wisdom to uncover.
If you find this podcast helpful, please subscribe! Don't hesitate to share a question or comment—I love the conversation. And if you're listening on YouTube, drop me a message letting me know where you're tuning in from.
In today’s podcast we focus on Matthew’s account of Jesus completing 40 days in the desert. It is not clear whether Matthew is drawing a connection between Jesus’ time in the desert and the Israelites wandering around in the desert for 40 years. What is noteworthy is that we have Jesus being tempted by the devil. The temptations give us insight into the heart and mission of Jesus.
The first one is the devil suggesting that Jesus turn the stones into bread. Jesus is clearly hungry. He had fasted for a long time. It would make sense, at least superficially, to use his power to regain his strength. Jesus is not seduced by this reasoning and realized the ends did not justify the means. Jesus would be using his own power for his own personal needs. This temptation highlights the role of rationalization in our sin life. To reduce anxiety, one can rationalize their actions to justify the choices they made. Research shows rationalization, a classic defence mechanism, can be used to justify behaviors conflicting with moral or religious standards, including sinful actions, by creating logical excuses that reduce guilt. In “moral disengagement theory” developed by the psychologist Albert Bandura, proposes that rationalization overlaps with mechanisms like moral justification, where harmful acts are reframed as serving a higher purpose, enabling sinful or immoral conduct without self-condemnation. The defence mechanism of rationalization is not bad and is actually one of the more mature defences against anxiety. It’s useful when it is temporary; it becomes a problem when it is used to justify sinful behaviour.
Jesus is then lead to the temple tower where again the devil encourages Jesus to prove to himself that he is the son of God. Jesus is again not tricked. Jesus teaches us about faith and challenges us when we want proof of God’s existence or direction. It’s natural to want some proof but faith is not about proof. James Fowler's stages of faith describe progression from literal acceptance to "Individualize" faith (adolescence/young adulthood), where people critically question traditions and demand personal evidence for truths previously taken on authority. Faith involves choice and develops an openness to seeing the world as more than just the physical. Faith requires us to be humble to recognize that reality is on multiple levels.
I want to point out that discernment of God’s will for our life is not asking for proof, its discernment. Looking for signs of God’s Will for us is good. The issue is what type of signs are you looking for? Dramatic signs of God’s will are rare. It is more useful to look for the subtle patterns in our life for direction.
The third temptation is Jesus being shown all the kingdoms of the earth, and the devil has offered them to Jesus if He simply pays homage to the devil. It might have been initially tempting. Jesus would take a short cut and quickly achieve his goals. What might be missed here is the cost of the short cut, it would result in Jesus surrendering his values and his beliefs. Psychologically, the response of Jesus models resisting rationalized shortcuts to power, avoiding moral disengagement where evil offers "a quick fix" to justify the compromise. The lesson here is it’s not just about the goals but the process. As a psychologist I’ve come to believe that it is the process that brings about personal growth and helps in developing spirituality. Being aware of process and the resulting challenges can help us be more resilient to dangerous justification and lead to personal growth.
This Gospel points out that temptations by themselves are not sin. Temptations may be the first step towards a decision to do evil but by themselves they are not sinful. Sin is often taking short cuts to achieve goals and thus depriving us from learning and growing. Sin is also violating our own beliefs and values. We also would be wise to focus on how we rationalize our behaviour to justify our actions.
Thank you for joining me today.
Next Sunday, March 1, 2026, I’ll be sharing a new podcast episode from Matthew 17:1-9, where we will hear about Jesus being transfigured before Peter, James and John. This Gospel will invite us to take a look at the mystical side of Jesus.
As I mentioned earlier, new episodes are published every Sunday, focusing on the next week’s Gospel.
A big thank you to Heather Patel Doherty and Richard Coulombe for their wonderful help in preparing each episode.
If you have any questions or comments, feel free to email me at peter.dohertyomi@gmail.com.
May God richly bless you!