Misconceptions Within The Moorish Movement- Abdullah Bey & Yisrael Bey

Start with the flag, not the folklore. We dig into why territorial sovereignty sits at the center of nationality, jurisdiction, and every claim that follows—and why a personal declaration or a stack of papers won’t dissolve U.S. authority. With clear examples and evidentiary standards, we break down how conquest, cession treaties, and the law of succession moved sovereignty over this land, and how that shift legally bound inhabitants through acquisition of nationality by subjugation.

Together we unpack the Sankofa framework: consanguinity and culture endure, but political and legal force only return when sovereignty is restored. That’s why a temple-issued card is culturally meaningful yet not a passport, why a court in a foreign system can’t confer Moorish nationality, and why “nation within a nation” requires a treaty, territory, and operating institutions. We distinguish citizen (domestic) from national (foreign context), walk through the limits of Article III claims about consular courts, and show how passports and consular jurisdiction derive from treaties and legislation, not social media templates.

We also address myths around birth certificates, statelessness, and “status correction,” and explain why expatriation is the wrong tool—reversion to sovereignty is the right process for reviving statehood and independence. If a flag embodies sovereignty, unity, territoriality, and diplomatic presence, the task ahead is to rebuild the institutions that make those elements real. No parroting, no shortcuts—just foundations that can stand before international jurists and genuine governance.

If this helped clarify what’s real and what’s noise, follow the show, share it with someone who needs it, and leave a review with your biggest insight. Your support helps us elevate the conversation and build the knowledge base required for true restoration.

Chapters

• 0:11 Host Welcome And Housekeeping
• 1:16 Setting The Frame: Territorial Sovereignty
• 3:16 The Sankofa Model Of Nationality
• 8:56 Sovereignty Lost And Legal Bonds
• 13:15 Misconception: Moorish Claim Ends U.S. Citizenship
• 18:18 Courts, Jurisdiction, And Nationality Cards
• 24:06 Citizen Vs National: Domestic And Foreign Use
• 27:46 Driving, Licenses, And Territorial Control
• 34:58 Expatriation Vs Reversion To Sovereignty
• 42:10 “Nation Within A Nation” Examined
• 48:57 Birth Certificates And Subjugation Myths
• 54:41 Human Rights Instruments And Their Limits
• 1:00:32 Did Moors Build The U.S. Government
• 1:06:45 Part And Parcel: People Vs The State
• 1:13:27 Passports, Embassies, And Real Authority
• 1:21:28 Consular Courts Require Treaties
• 1:25:45 Are Nationals “Sovereign” Over Laws
• 1:30:45 Audience Q&A: Treaties, Articles, Claims
• 1:45:25 Article IV, Privileges, And 14th Amendment
• 1:51:46 Final Myths And Closing Thanks

Transcript

SPEAKER_03: 0:10

What's going on, everybody out there? It's Ron Brown LMT, the People's Fitness Professional, Reporting for Duty, Soul Brother Number One. Oh, oh, oh. Thank y'all for coming out this evening. I really appreciate y'all. Uh, Brother Abdullah Bay and Israel Bay. Um, we're going to be able to do that.

SPEAKER_01: 0:30

Peace, everyone.

SPEAKER_03: 0:31

Peace. Go back into the misconceptions within the Moorish movement. I want to let everyone know to like, comment, share, subscribe. Uh, also, we are on Buzz Sprout. Buzz Sprout. Uh, you can leave fan mail, fan mail, if you want to leave fan mail uh for my um audio listeners on uh Spotify, Apple Music, and all of that Apple Podcasts. Leave fan mail. Don't forget the uh super chat, uh, whatever, whatever donation you can send us, we would greatly appreciate it. We're trying to grow the platform bigger and bigger and bigger and better. Uh, and that's pretty much it. We're gonna let the brothers take it away. And you got the floor.

SPEAKER_00: 1:13

Right.

SPEAKER_03: 1:13

Peace, peace.

SPEAKER_00: 1:16

Part two to addressing the misconceptions at large within the Moorish movement using evidentiary standards. This is the uh the octopus of territorial sovereignty. The topic is territorial sovereignty. Territorial sovereignty is the head of the octopus. Elements of telet of territorial sovereignty are acquisition of territory, loss of sovereignty, land boundary cession treaties, territorial jurisdiction, law of succession, change of sovereignty of a people and the United States Constitution, acquisition of nationality through subjugation and cession, change of sovereignty and its effects of the nationality of the inhabitants.

SPEAKER_02: 2:06

And these these are these are international law principles as uh territorial sovereignty is the primary uh core principle that are that are interconnected with these these these other principles that we that that affect us as a as a people that that we have to address. So this is um, I had Israel do this, and then then he uh was in black and white and did in a color so that we can give you know the people's uh a snapshot of these international law principles that affect us as dealing with our conquest matters, you know. So this is um, we just want to give to people. We've actually done a lesson on this, uh, on uh was a magnet crystal pyramid, uh, then was on another platform. And so we're gonna be we'll do this on this platform too. Um, uh Ron, we're gonna definitely need two hours for this one. Let me do this one, all right? So usually let us know when you want us to do this this particular lesson.

SPEAKER_03: 3:13

Okay.

SPEAKER_00: 3:16

All right, next we have the Sankofa bird. Sankofa bird is a symbol, is a cultural symbol for of Ghana, and it means to look back and get uh look back and correct what was wrong, or give back, look back and get what was left uh behind. And we have the Sankofa bird standing on nationality. Nationality is interrelated to the following principles. So these are elements of nationality at the top, national sovereignty to the left, self-determination, self-governance, national consciousness, national self-consciousness, national pride, national culture, national character. And on the right side, we have sovereign identity of the state, the state's identity, constitutional identity, constitutional name, national name, national identity, and constitutional self-governance. And also the Sankofa bird, as you see, has a fair zone, uh a Moorish cultural attire, and uh looking back to get the Moorish nationality, which was left behind and forgotten. Alright. On the left side we have national self-consciousness, national consciousness, national pride, national culture, national character, national coat of arms, national seal, national flag, self-governance. On the right side, national sovereignty, constitutional self-governance, constitutional name, diplomatic protection, treaty protection, consular relations, self-determination, national name, and national identity. To the far left, we have the consanguineus aspect of nationality. Consanguinity, ancestry, parentage, descent, genealogy, pedigree, lineage. Then we have the social cultural aspect of nationality. Language, dress, hairdress, ceremonies, holidays, rituals, festivals, dance. Then we have the political framework of nationality. Involves defining the national identity of the people, the constitution, the political, the people of. The political phrase, a term the people of. To the far right, we have legal framework of nationality. Involves the creation of nationality laws and the execution of the nationality laws. Four uh, four primary elements of nationality and internationality. Legal bond, rights and duties.

SPEAKER_02: 6:35

And international and international law.

SPEAKER_00: 6:45

Legal bond, rights and duties, states jurisdiction, and diplomatic protection.

SPEAKER_02: 6:56

All right, so here the the quote, this the consequences aspect of nationality and the social cultural aspect of nationality are protected within the political and legal framework of nationality. Sovereignty is the legal and political framework that recognizes, institutionalizes, and formalizes the nationality of the people. When the sovereignty is lost, the national, the national, the political and legal framework for a nation's nationality is also lost or dormant. So therefore, it doesn't have the legal force anymore. Meaning that I am German. So it doesn't mean that German has a legal bond to Germany. Why? Because the sovereignty is lost. One cannot have a legal bond to a state whose sovereignty is lost. So, but the the course, the consequences aspect is there, but the protection is lost. As I said before, the the the consequences aspect and the social culture aspect is protected within the political and legal framework. For example, you the the synagogue, synagogue's constitution. That means that it's being the language that's being protected within the synagogue's national constitution. That's the political framework. And then you would have legislation, national holidays, national dress, and so forth. So through it's so now it's protected through the legal framework, through the creation of laws that protect the culture of the people. But when the sovereignty is lost, the protection is lost. So our Moorish nationality, because our sovereignty has been lost and yet to be restored, our Moorish nationality does not have the legal and political force because the sovereignty is lost. So it doesn't mean that we have a legal bond to Morocco. Why? Because the sovereignty has been lost and yet to be restored. And so Jouali, 112 years ago, laid the footprint to restore our legal bond, our political and legal frameworks of our Moors nationality. Jouali, what he did, what he did when he displayed the Moors flag, the elements of a flag, sovereignty, national identity, territoriality, diplomatic presence. So Jwali did express sovereignty when he what? Reintroduced us to our mother, the Moors flag. Because embodied in the Moors flag is the Moors nationality, the Moors sovereignty, the pre-existing Moors national unity, pre-existing territoriality. Embodied in the all four of these columns are embodied in the Moors flag. So we have she's dormant now. Our sovereignty is dormant. She can't protect us now, but Duali laid the framework, he laid the footprints to restore the protection. It's not, has yet to be restored due to elements of people not coming to understand what he actually did. But you know, it's been said that Juwali did not say sovereignty. That may be true, but when he displayed what he did, I'm talking about the act, the act of displaying the Moore's flag is just an expression of um restoring a people's sovereignty because the flag represents sovereignty. Like how would one could say, I mean, one says because they lack knowledge. That's my bad. One says because they lack knowledge. So that's how. The how that one says that Duali then talks sovereignty is because they lack knowledge of what a flag is. That's all that is. A German flag represents German sovereignty, Chinese flag, Chinese sovereignty, Russian flag, Russian sovereignty, more flag, more sovereignty. In this case, our pre-existing, but it's still more sovereignty. So once they come to understand the elements of a flag, sovereignty, national unity, territoriality, international diplomatic protection, diplomatic presence, that's all that is. So it's still a lack of study. That's how they come to say. Because anyone who understands any any jurist, any international jurist, any international law professor, any ambassador, any any council general, and any um uh uh uh counsel, any president, any prime minister, they know what I know. They know what a flag is. So if you say, well, and you show them the flag, well, this Juali, you know, 112 years ago, you know, he went to introduce us to our flag, but he didn't talk sovereignty. They're gonna they're gonna look at the they're gonna look at you like you're a fool. How are you gonna say that Juali didn't talk sovereignty when he displayed the flag? It doesn't go. I mean, what it is that you lack knowledge, that's all that is. I'm not insulting anybody, I'm not insulting, you lack knowledge. That's all that is. All right, we continue.

SPEAKER_00: 13:15

Misconception at large. Once you claim your Moorish nationality, you cease to be a United States citizen.

SPEAKER_02: 13:23

All right, so once you claim your Moorish nationality, you cease to be a United States citizen. All right. Um, this is why we show the octopus. The octopus. United States territorial sovereignty, as you saw, that was at the head of the octopus. Territory sovereignty is a core principle in international law. United States has territorial sovereignty over our land. France transferred, France conquered our land and surveyed our land under Louis XIV, Louisiana territory. France transferred French territorial sovereignty to the United States through the 1818 or Louisiana Purchase Treaty in 1803. United States of Mexico, which was Spain's territorial sovereignty and transferred to the United States of Mexico. United States of Mexico transferred Mexican territorial sovereignty to the United States through the Guadalupe Peace Treaty in 1854. Spain transferred Spanish territorial sovereignty to the United States over East Florida and West Florida through the 1818 treaty. Great Britain transferred territory sovereignty through the through the 13th to the respective 13 states along the Atlantic Sea Coast in the 17 article through Article I of the 1783 Defender Peace Treaty between Great Britain and the United States. Here's what Tadic Majesty, that's which was King George III at the time, relinquished, acknowledged, reckonled the United States viz, viz. all 13, viz. V-I-Z means Latin for namely, all 13 and name to be free, sovereign, and independent states as he treats with them. So he and relinquishes. So King George III is relinquishing the territory to each of the 13 states respectively. That's how the United States gained territorial sovereignty. And as though one of the elements of territory sovereignty is not only do they, not only the state, the secession state gains the territory gains gains jurisdiction or control over defined the transfer territory, but also over the inhabitants. So now you have there's a process. United States forced us. The process of a state forcing a people of a foreign state, meaning the conquering state, forcing a pop conquered population of a state that they're subjugating, is known in international law as acquisition of nationality due subjugation, which means that United States, we would forced us into their legal system and placed us into a new citizenship framework. You declaring who you are, I'm a more doesn't remove the subjugation. You having more paperwork doesn't remove the United States subjugation over you, our people. Why? So you have a legal bond now. So so um, yeah. Um I'm no longer a United, you're so that means I'm no longer United States citizen, which means that you're no longer in this legal system of the United States. Yes, you are. So once again, the our Moorish nationality does not have the political and legal force as the German nationality, French nationality, Senegalese nationality, Russian nationality, Iraqi nationality. Why? One, their sovereignty is intact, our sovereignty has yet to be restored.

unknown: 18:03

Exactly.

SPEAKER_02: 18:04

I understand this is it's because it's wrestling against the misconceptions. As I'm speaking, the misconceptions are taking precedence in your mind. I got you. The misconceptions. So I gotta, and it's gonna take some time, all right? You know, because you've been taught that it does, that this process, not knowing that we have to restore our mother. Our mother has yet to be restored. Our mother is still in the hospital, she's in a coma. She's I mean that our sovereignty is still lost. We have to revive her so that we can what? Come under back under her protection. I mean, Ron, as I said to you and Mike, as I said to you before, is that we have to raise the level of our people so that we can resonate with international, international law professors, we can resonate with international law uh international law jurists, we can resonate with you know uh councils and consul generals and ambassadors. I want to resonate with them. I want to prepare the people, I want to elevate the people to be able to dance with them. That should be our aim. We need the we mean we're developing a curriculum so that we can resonate, we can raise the level of this Moorish movement, the informational base level. It's been too low. It's in quicksand. You cannot restore, rebuild, re-establish reversion to sovereignty and quicksand, mean misconceptions upon misconceptions. We can move, we can move on.

SPEAKER_00: 20:01

Another misconception at large. All right.

SPEAKER_02: 20:18

This is uh the the United States continuing their redefining and reclassifying us that France and Spain and Portugal and Great Britain did by redefining and classifying our people as black, nickel color. We are Moors by consequentity, nothing changes that. That's your blood, that's your ancestry. But the you say to correct the dehumanize and dehumanize and the subjugation status of nickel color, black, all that would mean, all that means is that that you are subjugated. You're still meaning saying if you have you put on record in the United States courts, so let's let's deal with the power, let's deal with jurisdiction now. United States courts don't have the authority to address matters dealing with Moors nationality. That deals with that's that power is invested in the cotton more and an organized government structure. That's more sovereignty. So you so all right, so what does it mean in international law? What does it mean in international law? All right, so the so the French courts, the French courts, so Chinese, Chinese nationals are going to French courts to have the French courts, you know, decide on their nationality or recognize their nationality. The French courts don't have that power. So, but what does it what would it mean in international law? You're going to a foreign power that's still subjugation. You you you're asking a foreign power, foreign United States courts, foreign power foreign to the United States, going into the United States court and declare their Moorish nationality. You're declaring your Moorish nationality in United States courts. Chinese are declaring their Chinese nationality in French courts. What does that mean? What does that act mean in international law for foreign power? Our mother has that power. That's more sovereignty. You're talking about the United States courts exercising more sovereignty. So we just it's just like once again, it's just a lack of knowledge. What Juali did, and one of the elements of reversion to sovereignty is restoring a more a conscious Moorish population. So the Moorish, the Moorish nationality card that is given at the that more science temples give, that doesn't, that doesn't, once again, it doesn't have the the political and legal force of more of nationality because our sovereignty has been lost. But it is an it is an a key, is an element, a key element. That that identification card is a key element for reversion of sovereignty. What it means is that it's and keeping in and developing a national registry, because you're talking about you have to have you develop a national registry of conscious moors. And so those who are carrying the card, you know, are those who are conscious and belong to that body positive. It's an element of reversion to sovereignty, but it doesn't have the political and legal force of nationality because the sovereignty is had to yet to be restored. So it just serves as an element, you know, it's important now. I'm not minimizing importance. I'm just wanting that it doesn't have the political and legal force of nationality.

SPEAKER_03: 24:34

Okay, it doesn't have the political and legal force of nationality. Do you I would say it's because there's not enough conscious Moors who are actively trying to restore the national uh the uh nationality.

SPEAKER_02: 24:50

That means exactly. I mean the mean with it the because is yes, the because is the sovereignty has yet to be restored. That's the the because would be the sovereignty has yet to be restored. And then you say your so the the reason why the sovereignty is yet to be restored is what you just said.

unknown: 25:05

Right.

SPEAKER_02: 25:06

That's that's you just gave the reason why the sovereignty has yet to be restored.

SPEAKER_03: 25:10

Right, right.

SPEAKER_02: 25:11

So how do we that's not that's not why this doesn't have that's not why it doesn't have the legal and political force, it doesn't have the uh Morris nationality doesn't have the legal and political force because the sovereignty has yet to be restored. The reason why the sovereignty has to be restored is what you it's what you said.

unknown: 25:28

Right.

SPEAKER_02: 25:29

So talk about the chain, they're talking about the chain of logic and the chain of logic.

SPEAKER_03: 25:34

Right. So now how do we get everyone on the same page? That's the biggest problem. You you're doing it, you're part of doing it.

SPEAKER_02: 25:41

You're you're part of doing it. New York, New York. I'm I just try to, uh as I know, I just try to keep it, I try to try to keep it practical. You are part of doing it. Your platform, you're not you just one of many, but I'm saying you're this is the how. You mean having us on, clearing up this, you know, you doing you having other people on, but we have to, we they need to have this knowledge though. The others that are on need to have this knowledge, but I'm saying you're doing it, Ron. You're part of doing it. Yeah, the fact that you called me six months ago. I'm I'm that I'm just letting you know that you're part of doing it.

SPEAKER_00: 26:25

Being active, keeping the keeping the torch lit.

SPEAKER_02: 26:27

Yeah, exactly. I'm I don't, I mean, I'm just trying to make it as plain because as opposed to making it all that, because it ain't all that. It's just you being active and you working with us and others. Now we gotta we gotta get the others that's on this platform to be in working together with proper concepts. We have other connections. This ain't no more. We on we we have a larger network, we have a network of other conscious and unconscious boards, educational umbrella of proper concepts.

SPEAKER_00: 26:55

Absolutely.

SPEAKER_02: 26:58

That's what's needed. I try to make it practical, bro. Well, because it is just that. Because if you try to what happen, what happened, Ron? If you try to make it so complicated, then they end up not doing anything. Yeah, you know, oh that's so much, that's too much. You know what I mean? No, you know, you don't want to, no, no, no, no, you know, just kiss it. You want to kiss it. And I I know that from experience. I know that from teaching. I know that from experience of what I'm saying to be true. You gotta keep it, you gotta keep it simple. You gotta give them like a simple task, you know. Uh, yeah, take this stick and then move it to this table. You know what I mean? And you say, I'm just I know I may it may sound overs I'm oversimplifying, but I'm just to make the point. Take this stick and talk, take it to this table. So now, oh they now took the stick and put it on that table. Now you give them another task. That's that's all I'm saying. I just try to keep it, just trying to make it, you know, so you're part of it, of helping. You and we're working together, Ron. And we're connected with other networks. That will you part of the network, Ron. And you have a network of what 10, 20 that you bring on that what uh that are part of organizations. Remember, and you're growing. Look at what the I'm not looking at the effect of you and Mike, Micah having and how you're increasing, you know, with Spotify and other net other outreach you, you know, your networks you're connecting to. You're doing it, brother. I appreciate you. You and my um Mikey. We can go to the next one.

unknown: 28:59

All right.

SPEAKER_00: 29:01

Another misconception at large, individual citizens or nationals can make a proclamation.

SPEAKER_02: 29:08

That is a that is a big misconception. That that that clearly means that they don't know the meaning of proclamation. They never looked up the word, they never looked up the word, they heard it from somebody else, like a Paul Parrot. They never looked the word up themselves. If they just simply look the word up on the on a um on a computer that they hold every day called a cell phone, just google the word proclamation. No, that's all. I'm just trying to, I gotta do it like this, Israel. Keep it simple, but hey, just Google the word proclamation. You won't need to say Abdullah said, Israel said, Ron said anything. Just Google the word proclamation, and you're gonna see that it's gonna be a head of state, a mayor. You know, uh a president, uh a king, it'll be a head of state, not individual citizens. Just Google the word proclamation.

SPEAKER_03: 30:10

A proclamation is an official public announcement, often in the form of documents signed by a government official, like a oh government official, uh signed by office signed by a government official, ain't that something?

SPEAKER_02: 30:26

It is a regular citizen, it's a government official, and all we did was just look the word up. Ain't that something? Just by looking the word up, isn't that something?

SPEAKER_00: 30:39

Yeah, so it's simple.

SPEAKER_02: 30:42

That's this is why I can sing you say that it's not a lot. It's foundational. What it is is that they have they listen to somebody on YouTube or Facebook or whatever it is, right? They ain't looking the words up themselves, or in reality. Don't don't my brothers and sisters, don't view us as no gods, please. Don't view us, check us, fact check us, don't view us. We ain't no challenge us, yeah. But do do you don't do your deal do due diligence?

unknown: 31:16

Yeah, yeah.

SPEAKER_02: 31:17

So thank you, Ron. But you know, we wanted the people to look it up. But thank you, Ron. Appreciate you.

SPEAKER_00: 31:30

All right, another misconception at large. Only a national can lean a person, place, or a thing, not a citizen.

SPEAKER_02: 31:38

All right, this is one of the uh we dealt with this two weeks ago, and and looking at national and citizen from a universal perspective. All right, so we have so we'll we'll start with let me start with citizen. From a from a universal perspective, citizen is domestic. The mock the the Bonaki, the Bonake citizen, Russian citizen, German citizen. So I the example I gave, whereas whereas national is is has a broader meaning in the international arena. So for let me give an example. A Russian citizen in Russia would not be classified as a Russian national in Russia. A Russian in China will be classified as a Russian national. We got they won't say Russian citizens, we got Russian, we got, we don't, they won't say Russian citizens, and some may say that, but Russian is but it's pro is but it's appropriate because the Russian national has a broader, I'm explaining, Russian nationals in China, Russian citizens in Russia. I'm giving the application. German nationals in France, German citizens in Germany. Citizen is domestic. That's why you wouldn't, it's domestic. So you wouldn't say what uh German citizens in France, because the citizen is domestic, it's German nationals. Nationals not nationals, not domestic. That's all nationals not domestic, citizen is domestic. Look it up, look it up themselves. Oh, they are they going by the European freedman group stuff. I'm going, I'm talking international law. I'm talking government structure. I'm talking government structured sovereignty. I'm talking, yeah, I'm coming from that that these European freedmen goes ain't never teach on, never teach on, never teach on. Now look how fundamental this is. Not even all that. It's a lot of the misconceptions following the European Freeman groups. They don't teach nationality, they don't teach sovereignty, they don't teach anything that we've taught on this platform, none.

SPEAKER_00: 34:25

Misconception at large. The current war we are in is nationals versus citizens.

SPEAKER_02: 34:32

All right, so and the reason why Israel phrasing, even though it would be the same answer for, but this is a misconception, though. So he has to he has to lay out all the misconceptions, which he did. So the current war. So once again, citizen is domestic. National is finds up a broader meaning in international arena. It's not a versus, it's that citizen is domestic. You're talking jurisdiction here. Citizens domestic, national is would be used in a a foreign, so so national, foreign, citizen, domestic. As I said before, you would not use citizen for a Chinese, Chinese national in France. They would classify it as Chinese nationals in France. You would not say Chinese nationals, you would not classify Chinese who are in China as Chinese nationals. So it's not a versus it's just understanding that citizen is domestic, and national refers to that which is if they're foreign. It has a much broader meaning in the international arena. Just want to just make it plain, keep it simple.

SPEAKER_00: 35:57

Proper concepts. Another misconception at large. Big one. Moors do not need a driver's license to navigate an automobile on the roadway unless they are conducting business. Driving.

SPEAKER_02: 36:17

So I know I know uh my 33 years of being Moore's conscious and involvement, this has been a lot of time, resources have been uh in this. I'm gonna address it though, but uh in in this area, not community outreach. I've seen individual Moors who spent a lot of time in this, not community outreach now. They don't care a jack about no community outreach. So so that's addressed. Moors need a driver's license to navigate. Moors do not need Moors do not need a driver's license to navigate an autobill, bill, ball bill on the road roadways unless they are conducting all right, business. All right, so you have let me there's conscious Moors who and they are right that we are driving, traveling on our ancestors' roads, that they're correct, but let's go back to the octopus. Let's go back to octopus. Go back to it, you not let's go back to the octopus. All right, you see their territorial sovereignty? Well, United States gained title over our land as the because a treaty, the French treaty, the Louisiana Purchase Treaty, with the survey, the the uh under Louis XIV, he commissioned surveyors to survey out the boundaries of the conquest. So when the treaty was transferred, when territorial sovereignty was transferred to the United States through the Louisiana Purchase Treaty, as well as the survey title or survey. So United States gained territorial sovereignty. So yes, this is our ancestral state roads, but we have United States has through not through conquest on the United States part, United States gained gained territory sovereignty from the conquering power of France and Spain and Great Britain.

unknown: 38:28

Yeah. Yeah.

SPEAKER_02: 38:30

So yes, this is our land, but we don't have we've lost our sovereignty. This this is why on the maps, this is why on the maps. It reads, all right, and um no one in no one in the year 1662 was saying United States. I was I was born in the United States, I'm from the United States, I'm going to United States, I live in the United States. No one in the world was saying that in 1662. Why not? All right, we got it. In 1662, United States didn't didn't exist. Yeah, we have a we have a question. Yes.

SPEAKER_03: 39:09

Do Moors have to expatriate expatriate uh US citizenship in order to become Moors natural national.

SPEAKER_02: 39:19

No, let me explain. No, expatriate. Let's let me explain. So once again, it's just looking the words up. It's expatriate, that's not the proper application for us. Which means expatriate means that you're going back to your sort a sovereignty which is already intact. Like, how you gonna repatriate to Morocco when she is the sovereignty is not intact? That's not the proper application. The proper application is reversion to sovereignty. Reversion to sovereignty is an international legal process by which a people who lost their sovereignty, process of regaining their sovereignty and restore and reviving their statehood and independence. That's the proper application, not expatriate, because our sovereignty has been lost. So when you're talking about loss of sovereignty, expatriate is not the proper application of law, it's reversion to sovereignty. So it's giving them the proper application, reversion to sovereignty based on our condition. So what is so what what is the condition? What is the status? All right, so expatriate would all right, so let's continue with expatriate. That that that would mean, all right, so you have a a a German, a German citizen in Germany, all right, so comes over to say United States uh jurisdiction and uh qualifies for citizenship through number of years of residency and so forth. And so therefore, they go through the United States that they've become a naturalized citizen, which means they renounce their allegiance, they renounce their allegiance to Germany and what uh pledge allegiance to the United States. They want to expatriate. Remember, Germany's Germany's sovereignty is still intact. So they want to patriate to Germany, which they would have to file, you know, there's a process, process going through the State Department, all right, fill out paperwork, um, involved with that. You'll just you look that up, the process. And I so they but the sovereignty is still intact. But our sovereignty is not. So that would not be the proper application. I don't anything you need to add, want to add to that, Israel? I just want to make sure I'm a clear cut with this. It's just understanding the proper application, what what what what our status is, what our status is, how did we how did we become citizens, or how were we brought into the legal framework of the United States? What was our status prior to that? What was our status prior to that? All right, so Duali point displaying the Morse flag indicates that we were of a pre-existing state. We believe that we belong to a state foreign to the United States. Why don't we no longer that we're not what? Governing, being governed, you know, governing under that Morse flag anymore, legislating, you know, uh executing laws, Moore's passports, Moors embassies, you know, Moorish consulates, you know, Moors ambassadors, Moore's consulate generals, where where that was the once the case. Why don't we function like that now? Because we lost our sovereignty due to Spanish, Portuguese, French, Dutch, Argonne, Castile, uh England conquest and colonization and subjugation. That was our that was our that's our original status. We lost our sovereignty. We've been France conquered, France, we was under subjugation of France and England, and that so the United States had maintained our subjugation for over 200 years. The United States forced us into their legal system under the acquisition of national due subjugation and placed us into a new citizen framework. To reverse that, to reverse that act of subjugation, Jouali began the process 112 years ago. It has yet to be completed. That is known as reversion of sovereignty. Jwali displaying the Moore's flag, restoring the uh restoring our Morse national consciousness to our Moore's flag, our Morse fast, our Morse turban, our Morse Bay and eel, our more uh regalia, more scimitar. So now we can look at the European Schreiners. Oh man, these European Schweiners and European mystics, man, they they they renamed and reclassified our Morse fans as the Schwartz fans. Because we're now what? We're now what Morse conscious, right? Could you Ali set the stage to we get to restore our Morse consciousness? Yet we have not restored our Morse sovereignty, though he laid the footprint, and that's because what Ron said. Because of what Ron said earlier is that because you don't because of those who are in those different orders don't lack this knowledge. I'm just trying to make it plain. It ain't all that is that they lack the knowledge of these words and the process and application of the law. We go to the next one.

SPEAKER_00: 45:15

All right, another misconception at large: Moorish Americans are recognized as government. All right.

SPEAKER_03: 45:23

So I've never heard that.

SPEAKER_02: 45:26

Moorish Americans are recognized, I've heard it as government. So we look, we we will look at what China's a government, France is a government, Iraq's a government, German's a government. So Moorish Americans are recognized as government. Well that well, Moorish American is not the name of a governing entity. So, and then you say government, you know, that that would mean that they are operating, legislating, executing, and have judicial power. They have Moorish judicial power, Moorish executive power. They're not that that means they have a defined territory. They're not filed within, you know, so let's so let's look at this. They're not filed, you know, our authority. That our authority is our pre-existing Moorish sovereignty. Our authority is is is inherited, not in Illinois. Our authority is not in Illinois Heritage Vine Statute. Our authority is not in United States codes, our authority is not vested in United States statutes, our authority is not invested, not vested in United States Constitution. Our authority is not vested in the Kentucky State Constitution. Our authority is not invested in Kentucky State Constitution laws, our authority is not invested in Illinois state constitution, our authority is not invested in Hurd's Hermitary by statute. Our authority is not vested in any religious corporation act from Illinois. That's not our authority. You said as a as a government, you remember so we're talking self-government, self-authority, self-rule, self-determination. So if they show you something that reads our authority from Illinois, that's all I need to see. That's that's I'm I'm not looking at the the the evidence that there is not. Does Germany have to file with Burkino Fossil to function as a government? Like Germany has to file paperwork. Yeah, yeah, yo Germany, yo, yo, Ron, Germany filed paperwork. Did you know, Ron, that Germany filed some paperwork and Burkino Faso, you know, so they can be recognized as a government. You didn't know that? You didn't know that Germany filed some Germany, don't tell a jerk told a German Germany's using Germany using it, Germany is using French laws. Germany's using French laws. According to French laws, Germany, German government, according to French laws, we're recognized as a government. I'ma continue saying this, my brothers and sisters. It's not a lot, it's the misconceptions. You're in quicksand. You're not grounded in foundational knowledge, foundational principles, core foundational principles. How do I know this? How am I gonna dance and answer these and break this? Because of going, I'm showing you what foundational core principles. I think we nail that. All right, thank you, Von, for this uh extra time. I greatly appreciate you, brother, you and Mikey.

SPEAKER_00: 49:25

Moors can create a nation within a nation. All right, this is my thing right here.

SPEAKER_02: 49:30

All right, Moors can create a nation within a nation. So see how I want y'all to see. I'm gonna do this. Just hear me out, y'all. Nation, see, I'm doing this nation within a nation. All right, so what would that look like? A nation within a nation. So so that um, so Russia through a treaty uh is granting through through a treaty, Russia is uh going to allow negotiate a treaty with Germany and give a defy portion of Russia to Germany, and Germany say nation within a nation. You said nation within a nation. That means within a nation's border with the preposition. See what I'm doing. Display follow me, y'all. Follow me language, language, the preposition within. I'm using grammar, my brothers and sisters. Nation within a nation, within. So let's follow me. Let's visualize this. We have a box. We have a box. I want y'all to place a smaller box within a larger box. That's a visual, that's follow me. And what that means, the the the preposition within, we have a red box. We have the so we have the red box, is the biggest, bigger, bigger box. We're gonna place the blue box within the red box. So you say the blue box is within the red box. We're talking this. This is grammar, it's prepositions. Understanding prepositions, this is spatial. This is spatial prepositions. Follow me, my brothers and sisters. So the blue box is within the red box. That means it's within the boundaries of the red box. So that means that the red box has to give authority to negotiate a treaty for one that red for the for the blue box to be within the set up within the boundaries of the red box government structure. How would that be done? Do a treaty. That's to be done because you're talking with the foreign state, another so nation within a nation that has to be done. We're talking about within a nation. Wizard that wizards that exist of filing paperwork in Illinois does constitutes that. Under the Hearns V by Statute of Illinois, the Religious Corporation Act of Illinois, Hearns vive Statute. Illinois was was one of the Illinois was one of the five states that was that was that was developed in the Northwest Territory, governed by the Northwest ordinance for a while until they set up a constitutional convention. All right. So they negotiated a treaty with the United States, whereby you remember the United States is exercising territorial sovereignty. So the United States gave them a portion. I'm just saying it's that these just look at the principles. So they now have self-governing, self-governing of power, legislative, executive, judicial power. They can what set up embassies, set up embassies in France and Germany and China, Bikino Faso and Senegalese, Senegal? They can send ambassadors. So don't ask. My thing is, once they say that, don't ask them. Do this. All what is the name? What is the name of your ambassador in Russia? What is the name of your ambassador in Germany? Where is your embassy in China located? Don't ask them that they set nothing up. Just ask him. As if they had. Yes, and then that ask the question according to the elements. And that's gonna be no, no, no, no, no, no, no. But the conscious boys can't do this because they don't know the fundamentals. Once again, it's not a lot, it's fundamentals, it's arithmetic. It's arithmetic. I mean found it's foundational. When I say arithmetic, it's foundational. Foundational to algebra. Arithmetic is foundational to algebra. All right, we go to the next one.

SPEAKER_00: 54:54

Another misconception at large. Our mothers sold us into subjugation of the United States by signing the birth certificate as the informant.

SPEAKER_02: 55:04

That is not true. I know that this has been going around for over about 50, 40, 50, 60, 70 years. This is a misconception. Right. In international, let's go to international law. Let's go back to the let's go back to the um the octopus. To explain this, I gotta go to the octopus. All right, so we have territorial sovereignty, which is a core principle in international law. We see here acquisition of territory. We have loss of sovereignty, land boundary cession treaties, territorial jurisdiction, law of secession, change of sovereignty of a people and the United States Constitution, acquisition of nationality due sub due subjugation and session. We have change of sovereignty and its effects on the nationality of the inhabitants. Oh, here we go. Change of sovereignty and this and its effects on the nationality of the inhabitants, which means that a conquering power, a conquering state has subjugated a state. So we have change, there's a so there's a so that state loses her sovereignty. So you have a change of sovereignty. And what effects would that have on the inhabitant nationality of the inhabitants? What one of the elements of territorial sovereignty is that the conquering state can determine the status of the conquered people of the territory that they conquered. They didn't sign anything, they didn't sign anything, they didn't sign a lick of paperwork. So that the answer lies in understanding the elements here that's that it's in the tentacles of territorial sovereignty. You explain it using this, these elements. Nothing you sign. That meaning that if you rescind all that today, yesterday, you still subjugated on the United States because our sovereignty, United States, our sovereignty has been lost. Our mother, our mother is still in the hospital, our protector, our nourisher is in the hospital in a coma. We must waken our mother. Juali began the process 112 years ago to waken our mother out of a coma. It's because of why what Ron said 15 minutes ago that these consumers lack this knowledge. It's why it's taken so long and we have not restored our more sovereignty. We lack this knowledge. We are operating and functioning quicksand.

unknown: 58:04

Okay.

SPEAKER_02: 58:05

Status correction. Correct your status. I don't hear anything. Correct your status. Your individual purpose visit. Individual, individual stuff, individual. I hear individual pot, individual pot, individual pot, individual pot, individual pot, individual. They never talk, no unity, they never talk no community outreach. They never talk. It's individual, individual. I got mine, satisfied, birth certificate.

SPEAKER_03: 58:36

You know what I mean? I'm gonna go to the questions in the chat. So uh does the Pan American Private International Law Code of 1928 give protections to Moorish Americans within the Americas?

SPEAKER_02: 58:51

Does the Pan American Private International Law Code of 1928 give protection to Moorish Americans within the Americas? All right, our mother, all right, just keep in mind again. I'm gonna go back to this. Our mother is in the hospital. Our mother is our protector. She can't protect us right now because she has yet to be awakened out of her over 200-year period of a coma. That's our protector. I mean, that does the United States, United States has jurisdiction over us. United States has territorial sovereignty. Because United States has territorial sovereignty that they gain through treaties with France and Spain and Portugal, United States, Mexico. United States that gives United States under under international law, subjugation and conquest, the right to govern the affairs and also determine. The status of the inhabitants. We have to restore our mother. Juali had it right. Juali had it right. They don't understand what he did. Duali didn't total sovereignty. That means they don't understand what I said earlier at onset. They don't understand that a mat that a flag embodies what? A nation's sovereignty. That is a grave misconception, right there. Not with that lack of knowledge. They're in leadership position. We got people in leadership positions who lack this knowledge of what a flag represents. I'm talking about what Juali did. You cannot, no one on this planet can challenge me on what Juwali did display the most flag. That that is cannot, that's irresputable. He did display the most flag. That is a fact fact.

SPEAKER_03: 1:01:00

Okay, I want to, I want to, he's he's uh saying it again. Uh being that the Pan-American private international law code of 1928 deals with nationality and territorial sovereignty, give protections to American, uh Moorish Americans within America.

SPEAKER_02: 1:01:18

All right, let me let me say this again. Because we lost our sovereignty, I on I understand, I understand about the Declaration of the Rights of the Child, Principle Three, every child a right to a name and nationality. I understand United Nations Human Rights Proclamation 1948, Article 15, Section 1, every right, everyone has a right to a name and nationality. I'm clear on that. But it's only when you're when you're talking about Moorish nationality. The Moorish nationality can only be defined and be under within a Moorish political legal framework. No international governing body can do that for us. We're talking about Moorish nationality. When I I didn't say nationality, I said Moorish nationality. I didn't say French nationality, I didn't say you have a right to a French nationality. I didn't say French, I said Moorish nationality. Yes, now it doesn't all right. Hear me out that what Von put up, the uh 1928 Pan-American does not have power over China defining Chinese nationality, does not have power or jurisdiction over France defining the French nationality. It does not have jurisdiction over Russia defining Russian nationality, nor does it have jurisdiction over defining Moorish nationality. Now we're talking, now we're talking specific. As nationality is the core foundation of sovereignty. So now, so now you're talking now because now you're talking, we're talking the political. That that can determine to tell the French government to the how to define the French nationality. Now what it does, now what it does now, because there are international human rights laws. So the French government does not have arbitrary power because of the French international because of international law. But now we're talking here defining now. We're talking defining the French nationality. We're talking placing the French nationality within the French political legal framework. No international instrument you can show me can say can dictate that to France or China, Burkina Faso, Russia, Germany. Because that's an indicate that's a product of Russian sovereignty, French sovereignty, German sovereignty. We couldn't be no Bokanabi sovereignty, syndicalist sovereignty. I understand that we're talking Moorish nationality. All right, I want to go. You want to get a German nationality? That's fine. A French nationality, that's fine. But you're talking Moorish nationality. So a sovereignty that has not been restored.

SPEAKER_03: 1:05:21

Okay, did the Moors play a part of setting up this government?

SPEAKER_02: 1:05:25

You see talk that did the new name talking about the United States government. No. Let me explain. I said no. That's that, and then I'm gonna give my findings. So did and we and we then we addressed this in part one.

unknown: 1:05:38

Part one, yeah.

SPEAKER_02: 1:05:39

This was addressed in part one, so I don't know. Should how much what do how many slides we have? Because we did address this um thoroughly. Um we did address this Ron in part one. Okay, I mean, I don't want to because I don't want to spend a whole lot of time doing something we've already done. In fact, we did it by three or four times, right? Because it's like three or four questions, yeah, related questions, right, uh, Israel? Yeah. That's related to that question, and we we addressed it uh extensively in part one.

SPEAKER_04: 1:06:15

Yeah.

SPEAKER_02: 1:06:15

Yeah, so we don't want to, because this is part two, so we don't want to spend a lot of time talking about what we already addressed in part one. I mean, I remember we addressed it extensively three or four different times. Now, if I had done it like you know, just you know, maybe in one 30 seconds, but it was addressed extensively three or four times in part one. Because I'd rather them go to part one so they can actually see, you know, and then hear the more in more detail about it and the findings that I that we that we laid out, you know, so we can let's go to let's continue here.

unknown: 1:06:50

All right.

SPEAKER_00: 1:06:51

So the question that's on the screen now, brother Ryan, uh, is actually the next misconception that we're gonna address.

SPEAKER_03: 1:06:57

All right, cool.

SPEAKER_00: 1:06:58

Misconception at large, more is our part and parcel of the United States.

SPEAKER_02: 1:07:03

All right, so we have part and parcel referring to land, partial land, part of the United States. Now, more is that we are subjugated on the United States. So if there, so if I mean, so there is a part of that meaning that the United States forced us into their legal framework. So I can't say that we're not part of the United States. The question is, how did we become part of the United States? Through the international law process known as acquisition of national due subjugation. What does that mean? United States forced us, we were already subjugated under the United States. United States forced us into the legal system and through legislation placed us into a new citizenship framework that is not United States laws, that is international law. United States applied international law of acquisition of nationality of subjugation means bringing a forcing a conquered population into their legal system. So we're part, I'm explaining the part. How did we become a part? So, yes, part, yes, through subjugation, but not as we the people. We are not we the people of the United States, we are not the sovereign body of the United States Constitution. We are not, we are not the national sovereign body of the United States within the United States Constitution. We are the people of the land. We are the original people of the land, but we are not the people of the United States. Hear me out. United States is not the land. All right, coming out. We are the people of the land and not the people of the United States. Don't they mean the same thing? No, they don't. Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. But go back to the go back to the octopus. Let's go back to the octopus. Oh no, no, no, no. We're talking about the original people of the land. The people of the United States. All right. So how did the United States gain become the use in a geographical sense? Remember, no one, go back, let's go back in. In in 1662, no one was saying, born in the United States, going to the United States, I'm from the United States, I live in the United States, I'm in the United States. No one in the world was saying that in 1662. United States had not been formed. How did that come? What is the international law process by which people have come to say, born in the United States, I'm in the United States, I'm from the United States, I live in the United States. What if the international law, if we're going to be looking at it right now, international law processing? What is that? All right, let's go to international law. So I said before, France conquered, France surveyed, do conquest, all right, under Louis XIV, named the the conquered, the survey land of land named the survey, conquered survey moorish land, Louisiana territory. France, France ceded to Spain in 1662 through the Treaty of Fontaineu. So now you say, I'm I'm in Spain. So 1763, people say, I'm in Spain. Because what France cedes what? Territorial sovereignty to Spain through the Treaty of Fontaineu. All right. So Spain retrofeed cedes it to the United States, to France in 1801. France sells it and therefore cedes the title through the Louisiana Purchase. You have Great Britain. Great Britain in 1783. Article 1. His Patenti Majesty recognizes the United States to be the United States bids all 13 and names to be free, sovereign, and independent states that he treats with them and he relinquishes to all the 13 debates respectively. So now you have uh so now that's there's an there's a new map, 1784 map, United States. Along the Atlanta Seaco, you said you said United States, right? But it uh but a 1760 map says Great Britain, 1770, 1770 map, Great Britain, but 1784 map, United States, 17, 17, 17, 8, 17 um 81 map, it says Spain or France. But 1784 map, 1704 map, where it says what it once says France, New France, New England's territory, and now says United States in 1784. I mean 1704. United, so now because of the territorial sovereignty transfer, the United States is used in a geographical sense. But that doesn't, but that's so that's how the United States acquired the territory. But we are the people of the land. We are not, we the people of the United States. We are not the we are not the national body, the sovereign body within the United States Constitution. We are not the people of the United States. We are the we are the original autochthonous native Aboriginal people of the land. Once again, misconceptions. And I want to thank Israel for deciding to do this lesson and laying out these misconceptions.

SPEAKER_00: 1:13:27

So another misconception at large, Moors can create their own passport. All right.

SPEAKER_02: 1:13:32

At large, that means Moors don't understand government. Moors don't understand sovereign. This is the whole point. All right, so here we go. Passport. All right. Done through legislation. French passport, German passport, Russian passport, German passport. Done through German let German passport is what? Through legislation. All right. So the German passport is control owned by Germany, right? And and how the passport is issued, termination date, that's done through German, German, German parliament. So outside of we've regaining our sovereignty, what passport you creating? Passport? Hold on. So you got so you're gonna what a Morse passport? You got a Morse passport? You in Russia with a Morse passport? You in you in Germany with a Morse passport? You in France with a Morse passport? You in Bikino Fossil with a Morse passport? You in Senegalese with a Morse passport? You haven't reverse me having recovered Lost Morse sovereignty. We use we set up embassies and portalists and send ambassadors, and they don't understand government. I've heard this for 33 years, 33 years. They lack in foundational knowledge of government and sovereignty and nationality, jurisprudence. They don't have a jurisprudence mind. They have what a parrot mind. They're parroting, it's too much parroting, no studying. It's no, there's no study, it's parroting. You got a lot of parroting going on. I'm being hard because I love us, I love our people, I love our people. We're getting not gonna say it, we're getting our you know what kicked. We cannot continue to pass along these misconceptions and pass these misconceptions to our children. We're getting our you know what kicked. We're sinking in quicksand. We're singing, we're sinking in the misconception, quicksand.

SPEAKER_00: 1:16:04

All we gotta do is stop.

SPEAKER_02: 1:16:05

Because you want to sell a package, you want to sell a package. Abdullah don't know what he's talking about. I got a passport for a thousand dollars. Five, I'm not making nothing up. Whenever I say, I'm not exaggerating, my brothers. I'm not, I'm not exaggerating. I'm telling you, I've seen people sell pack for ten thousand, fifteen thousand, five thousand, seven thousand. I'm serious. Um, they're gonna say, Abdullah, get your hands out of my pocket, Malcolm. They got something to sell you, yeah. And then what when it don't work, they ain't gonna they're not answering their phones, they're not gonna answer their phones, they will not answer their phones, they will not answer their phones. Give them five thousand, give it to them, give them ten thousand. They ain't gonna answer their phones, and you're gonna call me Abdullah! We teaching, we teaching found, we teach a foundation. This is I'm telling you, this can move this movement big time. Proper concepts. How far are we going in 112 years? How far have we gone in 112 years? I'm not teaching them, I'm not teaching misconceptions. I'm not I'm not in the popularity content. I don't care about you know people liking me. And I I and what I'm saying is that you're interfering with their money exchanging. That's all. Because they these people selling selling are selling selling these processes and selling these, you know, selling this paperwork thousands, thousands of dollars. All right, now uh uh now we have a um to my stick to the stick to the prophet's teachings, Moslem. I I am thank you, brother. I am I am sure sticking to the prophet's teachings. Ain't that something? I am sure, I sure am. I am sticking, I've not very well I've I am sticking to the prophet's teaching. Thank you. I sure am Juwali displayed the Moore's flag was behind you, was behind you, uh Israel. He displayed that. That's a fact. The elements of a flag, sovereignty, territoriality, national unity, diplomatic presence. He displayed that Moore's flag. That's his teachings. The fact that he displayed his Moors, the Moors flag, restoring our Moors consciousness to the what? Our pre-existing sovereignty, our pre-existing national unity, our pre-existing diplomatic presence, our pre-existing territoriality. I am sticking to the prophet's teachings.

SPEAKER_01: 1:19:31

Thank you. So he was implying that I wasn't.

SPEAKER_03: 1:19:36

I think he was talking about somebody else in the chat. All right, good.

SPEAKER_00: 1:19:48

I think we have about 10 more slides left. All right, we got time. Yeah, we got time. Yeah, we got time. Yeah, that's right. Another misconception at large. Article 3, section two of the United States Constitution authorizes Moors to establish Morocco consulate courts in the United States.

SPEAKER_01: 1:20:09

Yeah, Picola just handed me this picture of Jouale.

SPEAKER_02: 1:20:16

Yeah, I mean, I'm in Chicago now at the home office um 912 South Commercial Avenue, Chicago, Illinois. And uh, I think we're gonna be doing another live Sunday after this. Yeah, we're gonna pretend uh prophetic tea talk. We'll be doing in uh live. Yes. All right, my on my face on my Facebook page, Abdulla Bay's Facebook page.

SPEAKER_03: 1:20:42

Another live after this one?

SPEAKER_02: 1:20:44

Yeah, my on my Facebook page, Abdullah Bay Facebook page. Yeah, yes. I've been I've been I've done about four, five, six live. In fact, I did one earlier, walking down the street. Uh Yusuf had me, you know, on his yeah, I was on a casual phone conversation and he put me on live. Yeah. So um a misconception here. All right, so uh article three, section two of the United States Constitution authorizes Moors to establish Moroccan consular courts in the United States, and the United States. All right, so Article Article Three, Section Two of the United States Constitution. All right, the consular courts are established by treaties. So the French there's no there's no constitution that authorizes another foreign power to establish consular courts. Consulate courts are established by treaty. The authorization is through treaty, not through constitution. They negotiate set up consular courts through treaty. It's not through it's not within that's a that's a that's a grave misconception. Article three, section two of the United States Constitution, and there are there are several clauses within the section now. If you're talking about a United States Consulate Court, that would be article article article two. Article two would be not article three. All right. Article three, section one, and article three, section two. So you're talking about the United States judicial power rested in the Supreme Court in Article III, section one. Article three, section two deals with the type of cases that the courts, United States courts can hear. And uh state, so that's Article III, section two, and six or seven, eight, nine clauses, but it doesn't invest the the United States Supreme Court power to authorize constant courts. That is Article III, not even the United States constant courts. Article two of the United States Constitution for United States constant courts, not for a foreign court, not for a Chinese constant court, not for a French constant court, not for a German constant court. So absolutely not. That is this is a brave misconception. So look at Article 2 of the United States Constitution regarding United States constant courts. But once it's established through, once again, the authorization is through treaty. So it means a treaty has to be negotiated first, a treaty with Siam and United States, which has been done. Treaty with Siam between Siam and United States, which has extraterritoriality jurisdiction. That authorization is what established through treaty first. And then what so now when that is done through treaty for United States to set up a United States constant courts in Siam, all right, so now Article 2 of the United States Constitution now kicks in, where now it'll be it'll be governed. The United States Consulate Court in Siam will be governed under Article II of the United States Constitution, not Article III of Section Two. Article II or Article I, Article II, executive power or Article I of United States legislative power, but not Article II. Article III, Section Two will not have authority uh over the United States Consulate Courts in Siam. It'll be Article I Article II of the United States courts, United States Constitution. Look it up, my brothers and sisters. Well back, I'm gonna post this uh tomorrow. We'll post that that information tomorrow.

SPEAKER_04: 1:25:30

This is good, man.

SPEAKER_00: 1:25:34

Another misconception at large. Nationals are sovereigns, so they don't follow the same laws, rules, regulations, etc., as citizens. All right.

SPEAKER_02: 1:25:45

There are different types of sovereignties. The word sovereignty has taken on different meanings over the period of uh centuries, for a period of four centuries. There are different types of sovereignty. You have a most ancient sovereignty that's going back over 10,000 years, that sovereignty dealing with divine sovereignty, where that the authority comes from the divinity. That is the most that's the sovereignty that the Pope is operating on. You know what I mean? So it's called ecclesiastical law or religious law. But the most ancient part of the sovereignty is divine dealt from the divine sovereignty. Then you have another type of sovereignty where the sovereignty is vested in a royal house, house of Windsor, House of Hanover, uh, house of Ottoman or Osman, the Osmond House, and it's and it's spot and it's what through secession. All right, so that's through that. So you have that type of sovereignty that's vested in the house or or or king or or queen, and that's through secession. And you have a another type of sovereignty, a most the most modern type of sovereignty is known as popular sovereignty, where the sovereignty is vested in the people. So the phrase, the political phrase, we the people, or the people, refers to the most modern type of sovereignty, popular sovereignty. So we have so now you say nationals are sovereigns. So they so they're so they what they are kings or they're emperors, so that so they so sovereignty is vested, so within, so they have a royal house. So that these Moors claiming to be sovereigns, they have a they have a royal house, prevy council, royal house. So but yet, hold on. So but they raising the Moors flag though. They say, I am sovereign. You're raising the Moors flag, and you say, I am sovereign. That's a that refers to a pre-existent sovereignty. So all the all of y'all are sovereign, but that's the European freedman group crap. That's the European freedman group crap that's been out there for a while.

SPEAKER_03: 1:28:17

Is it is the freeman group and the patriarch group the same group?

SPEAKER_02: 1:28:20

Yes, yes. The patriot freedom, yes, patriot, freedom, yes, yes. Someone called them freemen, you know, right? Back like 30 years ago, they were freemen. And then the word patriot came out a little later, yeah, patriot groups, yeah, same same group. Yeah, that they got that from them. Remember, they don't teach nationality though. They don't that that those that that that that four columns, they don't teach that. They don't teach the four columns I had, you know, the consequences aspect of nationality, the the social culture aspect, the political framework, the legal framework, they don't teach that. They don't teach the truth of Morse history.

SPEAKER_03: 1:28:53

No, of course not. So, uh the brother Yashra, what happened to the slide? Okay, here we go. Uh the brother, what happened to the slide?

SPEAKER_00: 1:29:08

Oh, my hand. Yeah, what thing went out.

SPEAKER_02: 1:29:13

You say what? Everything went out. He said everything went out. You still you're breaking up still. Are you better? Oh, good, good. You focus. Yeah, put the step. Waiting for the slides to come back up. So I touched that uh this is clearing up a lot of misconceptions, my brothers and sisters. Please look at part one that was done two weeks ago. We did part one addressing misconceptions of the in this moorish movement at large with using evidentiary standards. We're using evidentiary standards and foundational principles. Israel. He's frozen. Hey Ryan, he's frozen. He's yeah, he's frozen. All right. Come on back in. Alright.

SPEAKER_03: 1:30:27

Alright, alright. So let's let's move right along. I mean, we could conclude now and then come back. Ah wait, this take give give one more chance.

SPEAKER_02: 1:30:36

One more chance. Wow, man.

SPEAKER_03: 1:30:38

How many more slides does he have?

SPEAKER_02: 1:30:40

We got things seven more.

SPEAKER_03: 1:30:42

Seven more. Okay.

SPEAKER_02: 1:30:44

Yeah.

SPEAKER_03: 1:30:44

Damn. Let's go to let's go to the questions.

SPEAKER_02: 1:30:48

Let's go to some questions. Let's go ahead. Let's go to some questions.

SPEAKER_03: 1:30:50

So we can. All right. Uh the 14th to 15th amendments puts us in slavery by giving us granted privileges, calling us black when we were already declared free under the national constitution of 17 uh uh seventy-four. That's not a question.

SPEAKER_02: 1:31:11

All right, one, we were not declared free under the Constitution, National Constitution of 1774. We once again, the remedy to our subjugation is the international law legal process known as reversion to sovereignty. To declare, to be declared free is to restore our mother. To be declared free is to go back to our original status, our original condition of self-governance, more statehood. That is to be declared free. If we're still being subjugated on the if the United States is still dictating to us, and you say United States, and the United States starts banging banners everywhere, United States exists, you know, and you mean that we're not the free a people is to revert, is to restore them to their original status and condition before slavery, before conquest, before subjugation, before captivity, before bondage. That is freeing a people, that is declaring a people free, restoring their more state, our more statehood, restoring us to self-authority, self-rule, self-determination, solidarity, self-governance, reversion to sovereignty, restoring us to independence, we're still reviving our more statehood. We don't know what constitutes freedom. We have to know your original status, our indemnity. We talk about insurance now. We restoring a dignity, meaning making a person whole. We have not been made whole. Have the elements been restored of freedom? Why are we still having these classes? Oh, you know what, Ryan? You know what? We're free, Ryan. You don't you're wasting your time, Ryan. Ryan, you wasting your time having this platform this platform, because we're free already.

SPEAKER_01: 1:33:45

My lord, increase me in knowledge. All right, another one.

SPEAKER_02: 1:33:56

Moores must go, you can read it.

SPEAKER_00: 1:33:58

Yeah, sometimes another next misconception at large, Moores must challenge the judge's jurisdiction in court by requesting the delegation of authority order.

SPEAKER_02: 1:34:08

All right, so let's go to the um let's go to the 1783, 1787 um peace treaty between um his impure majesty, Emperor Morocco, and the United States. All right. So let's so what does that does the treaty read that? Does the treaty of the peace and friendship treaty read that? So what so in fact the the treaty, as I mentioned last and week part one, that the treaty of peace and friendship between his impure majesty, Emperor Morocco, and the United States in 1787 conveys a private rights of action. I mean, doesn't convey a private rights of action, conveys a non-private rights of action, which means that it's delicate the power is delegated to a Moors consul or a United States council for United States citizens, but a Moorsh council. So does the treaty all right, does the treaty read what what does the treaty read Moors must challenge the United States judges to jurisdiction and court by requesting where's that where's where's that in the treaty? Show me that, show me that substantial language in the treaty. It's not all that. Show me the substantive language in the treaty. That's it. Show it to me. Give me the article, so type put in the chat. Type the article, type article in the chat of the of the treaty, 1786 or 1836 treaty. So type in the chat. Sound simple sounds simple how cut and dry am with it. All right, go to it, go to the next one.

SPEAKER_00: 1:36:09

Another misconception at large. The etymological meaning of the word education means to train like animals. All right.

SPEAKER_02: 1:36:20

All right, you have the the the root word du cad. You have the prefix e you have the suffix a-t-i-o-n. We're gonna start there. I mean how's I'm not gonna start. That's how you start. You said that it means that, so we're gonna see that. All right, so du c means lead, e means out, a t-a-ti-o-en, which is a suffix now ending, means process of, state of, or condition of. Where's animal training in the etymology? Lead out. Where's where why how does one I based on the etymology, lead out the process or conditional state of leading out? How does one derive that it means animal training? How did that come about? That someone derived that the they from the etymology that it means animal training. We gotta start there. That's the starting point. Then you give me something else that's connotative. So now, how does how is it that the connotative meaning takes precedent over the mother? What is that called? Cultural identity theft, uh subjugation, uh cultural genocide, or I mean what what so that's really pretty, that's really what it is. I mean, that's I I'm giving the etymology of the word. They can look it up themselves. Look up the etymology of the word education. They don't need to say Abdullah said anything. Where does animal training come in and the meaning? The true meaning. Yeah, not meaning, not meaning, but true meaning meaning refers deals with semantics, true meaning we deals with some etymology. So we go to the next one.

SPEAKER_00: 1:38:30

Another misconception at large, Moors can create allodial titles because they are indigenous to the land.

SPEAKER_02: 1:38:36

All right, because United States, just go back to the the the uh octopus, because United States is exercising territorial sovereignty over our land through the that they came from France and United States of Mexico, from Russia, from uh uh from Spain, from England slash Great Britain. As long as United States has territorial sovereignty, which means that United, that that that element is United States has control over the territory as well as the inhabitants. You're gonna do what? What what you're gonna create what? Where you're gonna create what? Do you know this was in operation, my brothers and sisters? Change of sovereignty and its effects on the nationality of the inhabitants, acquisition of nationality due to subjugation to session, change of sovereignty of the pe of a people and the United States Constitution, law of secession, territorial jurisdiction, land boundary cession treaties, loss of sovereignty, acquisition of territory. That's what we're dealing with here on our land. And United States has it under law of secession. So we're talking about law of secession, where whereby France or Spain, the predecessor state, transfers territory sovereignty to the secession state under the law of secession. And then so gain what? So if so if if the if the the status of the inhabitants is not determined in the treaty, the United States can determine the status, because the United States is now gained territory sovereignty. That's why what that's is why the United States can what have that's why they have these different maps. United States, yeah, United States, yeah, United States on the map. So United States is used in the geographical sense because United States what gained territorial sovereignty. That's why you're gonna create what? Why the United States has territorial sovereignty? All right, where you get that from? European freemans, patriots, patriots told y'all that did the patriots teach that the oh did this European patriots teach you this? Was this on this on this um on this uh octopus? Did they teach y'all the the the the the the consequenic aspect of nationality, the cultural aspect of nationality, the political framework of national of nationality, the legal framework of nationality? Did they teach y'all about these misconceptions and how to analyze them? Did they teach y'all what I have in Moses May Street part one, Moses May Street Part two, then Lamasonic copy square in the connection management of time keeping? No. They have tips, they have not taught y'all foundational anything. They haven't taught y'all any foundational anything. They certainly have taught y'all about nationality. We go to the next one. Y'all gonna be further, y'all gonna be further in dick quicksand.

SPEAKER_00: 1:42:07

Another misconception at large. People who are labeled as Negro, black uh negro colored and black are considered to be stateless.

SPEAKER_02: 1:42:15

That is not true. You already addressed this, but now just a quick all right. Once again, more is classified as niggle colored black, redefined as niggas colored black, main that by France, Spain, Great Britain, and that maintained that redefining status been maintained by the United States for over 200 years, are been forced into the United States legal system. They're not stateless, they're subjugated on the United States. That's not they're not stateless, they are tied to a state through subjugation. Stateless means they would not be tied to the state a state at all. But they are tied to the United States through subjugation. Do not United States not through United States process, through international law process known as acquisition of nationality through subjugation. United States applied that international law process through through the 14th Amendment, through forcing us into their legal system and placing us into a new citizenship framework. So, no, we're not sub they're not subjugated. I mean stateless. They are tied to the United States through subjugation. Or in unconscious mores.

SPEAKER_04: 1:43:46

Yeah.

SPEAKER_00: 1:43:48

All right. Another misconception at large, the word confederacy, as mentioned in the articles of confederation, refers to the Hadanasani Confederacy.

SPEAKER_02: 1:43:58

All right, so let's go to both instruments. So we're gonna so I want y'all to later on look at both instruments. Show me the substantive language in the instrument. I'm but I'm my brothers and sisters, I'll have a subtitle evidentiary standards, using evidentiary standards. It's not complicated, it's not all that. Go to the instruments. Does the instrument read what he was on here? Does the instrument read that? Does the honor does the aircore confederation constitution or and or how does the signs how does the signing constitution and the articles of confederation does it do they read what's that that does they read the word confederacy as mentioned in the articles of confederation refers? Does it read that? Does show me the identify the article in the hard night shiny constitution that reads just that it's just that simple, my brothers and sisters. It ain't all that, it's not all that. Go to the instrument, yeah.

SPEAKER_04: 1:45:07

Source.

SPEAKER_03: 1:45:13

Yeah, it is.

SPEAKER_02: 1:45:16

Just go to the instrument. That's all show me in the instrument. Well, don't do me no Freddy's stare. Don't give me no Sammy, don't do no Sammy Davis Jr. Just go to the instrument. What? He threw me off with that. That was the first time. Tap dancing. Freddy stare, you know, Sammy tap dancers, you know what I mean? Just don't tap dance around it. Straight to the point with it. To the point. That's yeah, that's yeah, straight to the point.

unknown: 1:45:45

Yep.

SPEAKER_00: 1:45:47

All right. Next one, uh, another misconception at large. Article four section two is the citizenship clause distinct from the 14th amendment.

SPEAKER_02: 1:45:59

Article 4 section two is the citizenship clause distinct from the fourth to remember?

unknown: 1:46:05

Yeah.

SPEAKER_02: 1:46:07

Is that they're asking uh Article 2 is the is the United States Constitution. Yeah, Article 4, Section 2 of the United States Constitution, is the citizenship clause distinct from the fourth to remember? Yeah, is that a misconception?

SPEAKER_00: 1:46:23

Yes, misconception, yeah.

SPEAKER_02: 1:46:25

What do they think they mean by that, yeah? Because I've never I've never heard that before, but what I'm talking about.

SPEAKER_00: 1:46:34

I don't know how to the citizenship clause distinct from the 14th amendment. Um article four, section two speaks on the uh the citizens of the of each state shall be guaranteed, uh was it the privileges or what or the immunities or whatnot of the six of the several states. And uh the misconception is that that's supposed that's supposedly that clause is a citizenship clause. But article four, when you get into article four, that's dealing with uh the admittance of new states.

SPEAKER_02: 1:47:08

So the admission of new states, right? Article four. Is that article section three or is Article 4?

SPEAKER_00: 1:47:15

This this is saying Article 4, Section 2.

SPEAKER_02: 1:47:20

But that dealing with the admission of new states. Yeah, I don't know how to answer. I mean, I don't know how to because I I don't know how to address this one. That this is distinct from the four to remember because I mean it will be distinct from the fourth because it's two different. This is uh that's this is uh this was agreed upon uh article four section by the states, um and the northwest ordinance. Yes, so yes, it will be distinct. Is that what we asking?

SPEAKER_00: 1:47:50

Yes, but I still don't so it wasn't it wasn't to bring in citizens, it was to bring in states, to bring in the state as a whole, right?

SPEAKER_02: 1:47:59

All right, all right, yes, yes. So I got you. All right, I didn't see. I still all right. I want to just click clear it up for the people, brother.

SPEAKER_00: 1:48:10

Okay, so let me find the uh all right. So article four, section two reads the citizens of each state shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of citizens in the several states. So what it's saying is that the citizens of each state, like one state, like the citizens of Kentucky, right, shall be entitled to the to all privileges and immunities of the citizens of New York, California, Philadelphia, you know, all the rest of the states that exist.

SPEAKER_02: 1:48:45

All right, yeah, yeah, I got you. All right, I understand that. So that's even that's even those um uh Article 4, Section Four, uh the uh United States shall guarantee a Republican former equal footing, that's the equal footing clause. Equal footing clause, article four section four, uh the United States shall guarantee a Republican former government, all states in the Union. That's an equal footing clause. That was that was one of the agreed upon that they were discussing when they were ironing out the Northwest ordinance, and that that to bring in that was part to bring in new states, all right. They have to guarantee that that that they would be on equal footing with the 13 parent original states. That would that's tied to that. That that principle was related, yeah. Yeah, all right.

SPEAKER_00: 1:49:35

Okay, but distinct from the 14th are still uh yeah, they're actually it is the 14th amendment is dealing with uh naturalization and all right, yeah.

SPEAKER_02: 1:49:45

So, yes, it's distinct from the 14th amendment. Absolutely, absolutely. Now I understand where you're coming from.

SPEAKER_00: 1:49:50

I got you, but like the claim is that Article 4, Section 2 is like uh, I guess that was the citizenship clause before the 14th Amendment.

SPEAKER_02: 1:49:58

All right, I got you. That's the claim. All right, I still we'll we'll we'll we'll you know what we're gonna come, we'll come back to you and I will discuss that and then we'll um we're gonna come back to that to give it, you know, give them a much clearer, you know, explanation as far as this that's concerned. So we're let's move on.

SPEAKER_00: 1:50:17

So another mixed misconception at large of the Continental Congress was established by the indigenous people of the continent. Kind of really already cleared that up in the yeah, we already cleared that up. All right, so yeah, that that was it, right? That's it.

SPEAKER_02: 1:50:31

That was it. All right, good, man. Thank you, Von, for this extra time, man. I greatly appreciate you, man, for that. Uh, you see, we needed it. We got two.

SPEAKER_03: 1:50:42

Well, well, I'm gonna just let you know every anytime you come up here, yeah. You know, you got the two hours, so that's that's gonna be all right.

SPEAKER_02: 1:50:50

So now we know all right, we you know, we know, all right. That's good.

SPEAKER_03: 1:50:53

Yeah, much peace, yeah.

SPEAKER_02: 1:50:55

Yeah, much peace. Yeah, no doubt.

SPEAKER_03: 1:50:57

Indeed, on that note, thank you, brothers, for coming out this evening. Thanks for all of the viewers. I really appreciate y'all. Um, uh, don't forget to like, comment, share, subscribe. I'm getting a commercial made right now, so I don't have to say this. I'm just gonna so I'm just letting y'all brothers know every 15 to 20 minutes. I'm gonna click on the commercial just to let you know. You know, we we need we need the uh no, you need to do that.

SPEAKER_02: 1:51:22

No, that's fine. You need to do the commercial, absolutely.

SPEAKER_03: 1:51:26

So again, thank you guys for coming out this evening, and we'll see you, I guess, next month, right? That next month, yeah.

SPEAKER_02: 1:51:33

Next uh next month, the second, second, second Wednesday of November. Yep, second Wednesday November.

SPEAKER_03: 1:51:38

The Moors would be up here. Peace out to everybody in the chat, and we are out of here. Peace.

SPEAKER_01: 1:51:45

Peace. Peace.