Did the United States End Colonization? - Review Part 1

Think colonization ended with American independence? We put that belief on trial by reading the receipts: the 1762 Treaty of Fontainebleau, the 1763 Treaty of Paris, the 1800 Third Treaty of San Ildefonso, the 1803 Louisiana Purchase, and the 1783 Definitive Treaty of Peace. Together we follow how sovereignty over vast territories moved from France to Spain to Britain and ultimately to the United States—without returning land to indigenous nations.

We approach treaties as what they are in international law: title instruments. That lens unlocks a chain of custody usually hidden beneath patriotic myths. Who conquered? Who surveyed and drew boundaries? Which instrument transferred control? By answering these questions directly from the text, we show how “territorial sovereignty” passed through cessions and retrocessions while the status of the land as conquered never changed. You’ll also hear a straight-to-foundation takedown of the “corporate United States” narrative by focusing on a single constitutional keyword: vested. Legislative, executive, and judicial powers are fixed where the Constitution places them, and that clarity dissolves a host of online misconceptions.

Along the way, we connect history to present realities: how river lines became borders, how survey maps became property systems, and how treaties still structure who governs people and resources today. This is education as service—evidence over opinion, documents over hearsay, method over myth. If you’ve ever wondered whether maps tell the truth or just tell a story for the powerful, this conversation gives you the tools to read the legend for yourself.

If this episode sharpened your lens, share it with a friend, subscribe for future deep dives, and leave a review telling us which treaty changed your mind most.

Chapters

• 0:00 Host Intro And Panel Setup
• 0:49 Mission, Movement, And Support Channels
• 1:43 Framing The Core Question
• 3:26 Community Event Promo And Networking
• 6:56 Defining Cession Treaties As Land Title
• 8:58 Treaty Of Fontainebleau: France To Spain
• 13:45 Chain Of Custody And Survey Maps
• 16:36 Conquest Status And Territorial Sovereignty
• 20:12 West Coast, New Spain, And Dutch To British Shifts
• 24:38 Title Search Analogy And Public Misconceptions
• 28:32 Education As Service And Community Standards
• 31:06 Louisiana Purchase And Treaty As Title
• 34:10 Corporate United States Myth And Vested Powers
• 41:20 Treaty Of Paris 1763: Articles And Boundaries
• 47:32 Moderation, Trolls, And Staying On Evidence
• 49:34 Spain Retrocedes Louisiana: San Ildefonso
• 52:24 1783 Peace Treaty: U.S. Recognition And Borders

Transcript

SPEAKER_01: 0:12

What's going on, everybody out there? It's Ron Brown, LMT, the People's Fitness Professional, aka Soul Brother Number One Reporting for Duty. And this is uh another episode of NYP Talk Show. We got Civil Letter in the Building, Abdullah, and Yasra Yes Real. Tonight we're going to review the uh podcast that we did with these brothers prior, based on the United States in colonialization. So here's a review. Before we go into the review, I'm going to run this commercial and we'll go right into it.

SPEAKER_00: 0:49

Peace family. Welcome to NYP Talk Show. This is more than a podcast. It's a conscious platform rooted in truth and culture from the 5% nation, nation of Islam, Moorish movement, and Masonry. Our mission is to reclaim our narrative and uplift the African diaspora with real stories and real conversations. Support us through Super Chats during live shows. Donations on Cash App, GoFundMe, Patreon, or Buzz Sprout. And by refing our official merch, available on our website and right here on YouTube's merch shelf. Every dollar, every super chat, every hoodie builds the movement. This is NYP Talk Show.

SPEAKER_01: 1:38

All right, we're back, we're back, we're back. Did the United States end colonialization? We're going right into the review. I'm going to put the slide up right now, and you brothers can take it, take it away. All right.

SPEAKER_06: 1:53

Peace, everyone. Peace. Peace. So the title for today's presentation is a review of Did the United States End Colonization? First, we have this flyer. Present the 15th annual. Presents the 15th annual. Keynote speaker, Dr. Jesse Fields, Dancers, Drummers, Music, Spoken Words, Special Guests. Please donate at PayPal. C-O-B-I-N-C 216 at A O L dot com. HTTPS GoFundMe. Gofund.me slash 942576 C D D um what's this? Nagu Nguzo Saba.

SPEAKER_03: 3:16

Saba. Yeah.

SPEAKER_06: 3:18

The seven principles. I'm trying to rub out in this fucking screen. Meaning unity. Kuji Chagulia meaning self-determination. Kuji Jagalia. Ujima. Collect meaning collective work and responsibility. Ujama meaning cooperative economics. Nia meaning purpose. Kumba meaning creativity. And Imani, meaning faith. Co-sponsors, Bahami Bahamian, American Association, Big Man in Entertainment, Brothers in Recovery, Harlem Transformation Project, Living Redemption, Man of Purpose, Peacemakers Project, Harmony, Street Corner Resources, TBS, New Directions, You Can Change. Vendors, call Brother Reggie Mitchell at 646-633-7539. And this event takes place Saturday, December 27th, 2025, 2025, at St. Charles Romeo Church at 211-West 141, West 141st. 1009 from 12 to 4 p.m. Um call 212-662-2878 or 646-248-3353 for info in association with the Knights of Peter Clapp Claver.

SPEAKER_03: 5:13

I'll be in the house, and then Rod said Ron said that he'll be in the house too. So I will be there uh vending uh Ron uh uh Raheem Abdullah Bay. Uh there'll be quite a few conscious moors will be there in the house, uh, you know, networking, building. Uh Luisa Flores, she'll be in the house. She works with us. So um I'm excited. I I attended last year. That was my for the first time. I did Vinn. And uh so I'm excited to um to go back to be so I just wanted um Israel to put this up so we can um let people know about the event and that we'll that we will be in the house. Uh we go, we'll we'll do pictures or take pictures and lives and everything. So I'm excited. All right, thank you, Ryan. You're welcome. Market this.

SPEAKER_01: 6:10

Oh no, come on, man. That's what this is for, man. This platform is for everybody. You want to promote whatever you want to promote. If you want to promote your you know, whatever fezes, you're selling fezes, you're selling this, you're selling that, you're venting, you know, but you're welcome. You're welcome.

SPEAKER_03: 6:26

All right, so I can you know tell you know what why we'll actually put my books up there next time, too.

SPEAKER_02: 6:31

All right, yeah, you can yeah, yeah.

SPEAKER_03: 6:33

So we'll make slides for that. Yeah, in fact, I got some for that.

SPEAKER_01: 6:36

Yeah, yeah, the slides and and what whatever you have, you're vending. So you're vending your books and all of that. Yes, uh-huh. Yeah, let's put all that up there. All right, so I'll get it together.

SPEAKER_06: 6:46

Yeah, we'll definitely get those.

SPEAKER_03: 6:47

Yeah, we get that. Thank you, um, Israel.

SPEAKER_06: 6:49

You're welcome. All right, excuse me. So let's get started. Uh review. Did the phrase in the United States, as used in a geographical sense, come about through the various landbound recession treaties with indigenous Moorish tribes, wherein we agreed to transfer our territorial sovereignty rights to our lands to the new extension of colonial powers called the United States? Or did the phrase in the United States as used in a geographical sense come about through the various landbound recession treaties, whereby Great Britain, Spain, France, Russia, and the United States of Mexico transferred their territorial sovereignty over our lands to the new extension of colonial powers called the United States? The answer. The phrase in the United States, as used in a geographical sense, came about through the various land boundary cession treaties, wherein Great Britain, Spain, France, Russia, and the United States of Mexico transferred their territorial sovereignty over our Moorish lands to the United States. Session treaties are land titles in international law. This is a continuation of European discovery, conquest, subjugation, colonization of our lands, and the continued subjugation of our people. Article 4, section three of the United States Constitution is how our land is managed under the authority of the United States Congress. So we're gonna get into uh subsession treaties. We're gonna read articles of uh treaties, you know, uh so we can uh view the same thing that Brother Abdullah and I view in order to make these conclusions, to come to our conclusion, to make these statements, to make these slides, you know, make these claims. So we're gonna review the evidence. This is the 1762 definitive act of cession of Louisiana by the King of France to the King of Spain, and it's also known as the 1762 Secret Treaty of Fontainebleau. Uh Lewis, by the grace of God, King of France and Navarre, to all to whom these presents shall come, greeting. Whereas our very dear and well-beloved cousin, the Duke de Choice, Peer of our Realm, Knight of Our Orders and of the Golden Fleece, Lieutenant General of our Armies, Governor of Touraine, Colonel General of the Swiss and Grissens, Grandmaster and Superintendent General of the Post and Relays of France, our Minister and Secretary of State for the Departments of War, and Marine and the correspondence with the courts of Madrid and Lisbon, did sign in our name with the Marquise de Grimaldi, Knight of Our Orders, Gentleman of the Chamber, in exercise of our very dear and well-beloved brother and cousin, the Catholic King, and his ambassador extraordinary near us, a preliminary convention whereby, in order to give to our said brother and cousin a new testimonial of our tender friendship, of the strongest interest which we take in satisfying him and promoting the welfare of his crown, of our sincere desire to strengthen and render indissoluble the bonds which unite the French the French and Spanish nations. We ceded to him entire and perpetual possession of all the country known under the name of Louisiana, together with New Orleans and the island in which that city stands, which convention had only been signed conditionally and subsparati by the Marquise de Grimaldi. And whereas our said brother and cousin, the Catholic King, animated by the same sentiments towards us, which we have invinced on this occasion, has agreed to the said session and ratified the conditional accept acceptation made by his said ambassador, extraordinary, which convention and ratification are here inserted word for word as follows. Whereas on the third day of the present month, the preliminaries of a peace were signed between the crown of Spain and France on the one part, and those of England and Portugal on the other. And the most Christian king made very dear and well-beloved cousin, pardon, and my very dear and well-beloved cousin, purely from the nobleness of his heart, and the love and friendship in which we live, thought proper to dispose that the Marquis de Grimaldi, my ambassador extraordinary, near his royal person, and the Duke de Choice Choice, his Minister of State, should on the same day sign a convention by which the crown of France ceded immediately to that of Spain, the country known by the name of Louisiana, together with New Orleans and the island in which this that city stands, and by which said ambassador agrees to the session, only conditionally subsperata, subsperati, as he is not furnished with orders to execute it absolutely, the tenor of which convention is the following. Proposes in consequence to act with his Catholic Majesty at all times and all circumstances, in a perfect uniformity of principle, for the common glory of their house and the reciprocal interests of their kingdoms. With this view, his most Christian Majesty being fully sensible of the sacrifices made by the Catholic King and generously uniting him, united with him for the restoration of peace, desires on this occasion to give him a proof of the strong interest which he takes in satisfying him and affording advantages to his crown. The most Christian King has accordingly authorized his minister, the Duke de Choisul, to deliver up to the Marquis de Grimaldi, the ambassador of the Catholic King, in the most authentic form, an act whereby his most Christian Majesty cedes in an entire possession, purely and simply, without exception, to his to his Catholic Majesty and his successors in perpetuity, all the country known under the name of Louisiana, as well as New Orleans and the island in which that place stands. But as the Marquis de Grimaldi is not informed with sufficient precision of the intentions of his Catholic Majesty, he has thought proper only to accept the sad session conditionally and subsperati until he receives the orders, until he receives the orders expected by him from the king his master, which, if conf confirmable, confirm conformable with the desires of his most Christian majesty, as he hopes they will be, will be followed by the authentic act of session of the said country, stipulating also the measures and the time to be fixed by common accord, by the evacuation of Louisiana and New Orleans, by the subjects of his most Christian Majesty, and for the possession of the same by those of his Catholic Majesty. In testimony whereof, we, the respective ministers, have signed the present preliminary convention and have affixed to it the seals of our arms. Done at Fontainebleau on the 3rd of November 1762, the Duke de Choice, the Marc de Grimalda, the Marquis de Grimalda, Grimaldi.

SPEAKER_03: 15:58

And this this type of study is needed. You know, as we going through the even going through the treaties, this type of study is needed. The chain of custody. When you look at when you read uh treaty cases, when when they're dealing with the case summaries, case summaries of treaty cases. And when they're particularly dealing with sessions or a transfer of land from one state to another, though in the treaties, in the beginning of the treaty summary, I mean a case summary, they'll they'll go through the history of the the chain of custody of that particular property. Right. It's called the chain, the chain of custody or chain of transfer, variance of the of the power, and that's what we that's what we're showing. So so to so to the claim is uh dead to the United States, the question, did the United States in colonization. As Israel said, that we wanted people to look at how we draw the conclusion. So as people won't say Abdullah and Israel said, they don't need to say that. There's no need to say that. So we want to we're gonna because this this type of study is very important. It has not a lot of conscious morals because they don't know it. So they but we have we have to step our game up. We have to raise, we have to raise you know the standard. It's too much, it's too much, so-and-so said. So-and-so said that is weak. That is weak. We cannot continue with that. We cannot pass that down to our children. That cannot be a legacy that we give our children. Cannot leave that legacy. We cannot leave so-and-so say legacy to our children. We must teach our children critical thinking. There's a book called Asking the Right Question: A Guide to Critical Thinking.

SPEAKER_01: 18:20

Yeah, I think we presented that on this.

SPEAKER_03: 18:22

Yeah, we presented yes, yes.

SPEAKER_01: 18:25

Yeah, a few episodes ago, like a while ago, actually, right? Yeah, yeah, yeah.

SPEAKER_03: 18:35

Not not too long ago.

SPEAKER_06: 18:37

Evidentiary standards, the misconception.

SPEAKER_03: 18:39

Evidentiary standard, yeah, misconception. That was about a month ago, yeah.

SPEAKER_02: 18:44

Yeah, yeah.

SPEAKER_01: 18:52

Okay, so the chain of custody. This is where we're so the chain of custody in 1760 62 Spain went from France to Spain, right? Listen, I'm telling you, the brother uh uh Morel Smith L. If you watch his video and you put this video together, and all the videos that you you you you've done here, yes, it'll all tie the information together. I think you and that brother, you two and that brother.

SPEAKER_03: 19:28

No, we we won't look at it. Yeah, we we we got this we and Israel and I will check it out that you now that you're saying that, yeah. Because we might we if that's that the case, Ron, we might uh we want to reach out to him, yeah, and we can do we can collaborate. Ourself, Israel, and we can all we can collaborate. I mean, you know, we we're open to doing that.

SPEAKER_06: 19:54

All right, so we kind of got the concept of this. I'll go to the next or to the question that he had. So the question, you know, we just read the Treaty of Fontainebleau or the uh 1762 definitive act of cession of Louisiana by the King of Spain. Um, so did France return the conquered and colonized land to the indigenous people of the said land through this treaty, or did France continue to keep the conquered lands under colonial occupation by ceding it to Spain in this treaty? And the answer would be France continued to keep the conquered land under colonial occupations by ceding it to Spain, as we all read or view by uh in this treaty, in the 1762 Treaty of Pontaine Blue.

SPEAKER_03: 20:45

So the status of the land never changed. It there still remained France conquered, Spain didn't conquer, Spain did not conquer, so France acquired the land through conquest. Spain acquired the land through cession treaty, meaning transfer of the land through a legal instrument, i.e. treaty. But Spain's France acquired it through conquest. Spain acquired it from France through cession. So Spain is not the conqueror of the land. That that Louisiana territory, Spain is not the conqueror, Spain, uh, France is, and France is the one under King Louis XIV authority.

unknown: 21:38

Yeah.

SPEAKER_03: 21:38

Spain, France is the one that surveyed France created the survey map, not Spain's. Spain didn't create those the survey map. Spain, France created the survey map. Spain, which is the title, the title for the title for France, um conquest title for France is the survey map. So France transfers now the title for Spain is the treaty. That treat, the treaty we just read, the Fonte Balou treaty is the title for Spain. Along with that, so the survey map, the boundaries are already set by France, artificial boundaries of the conquest. So France, so now Spain acquired territorial sovereignty through the through the treaty, Fontabilou. So on the she was showing that she explains explaining the chain of chain of custody. That the land, the status of the land is still conquered to this day, as of today, to uh November 26th, November 26, 2025, at 723 Eastern Standard Time. The land is still conquered land. It's in the hands of the United States now. The status of the land never changed, it's still conquered land. Abdullah. What would we what will remove it from being conquered land? United States now has to what? Turn it over to the initial the native people.

SPEAKER_06: 23:24

This first part would have to take place.

SPEAKER_03: 23:26

Yeah, it has to, yeah, other than that, it's still conquer land. I mean the United States ain't the native people. The signers of the the uh declaration of independence, the articles of confederation, the uh uh the uh the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, United States Constitution are not the native autochthonous Aboriginal, original people of the land.

SPEAKER_01: 23:58

Right. Okay, so what you're saying right now is that you the United States now own that?

SPEAKER_03: 24:07

And not not um the pop use the proper term, international term. We're gonna use the international term. United States has territorial sovereignty. Has territorial sovereignty, sovereignty through treaty. Territory. So territories, the United States has territorial sovereignty over the lands through the treaty. Yes, that's the that's the term and international law, territorial sovereignty. What that means is the United States has control over the defined territory as well as the inhabitants, yeah. Full control, yeah. Yeah, full control over the defined territory as well as the inhabitants. That includes us. They have control over us, yeah. So United States didn't conquer. United States is not a conqueror, France is, Spain is, Great Britain, the Dutch, they're conquerors. United States is in possession of stolen land, or it was transferred into the hands of the United States, territory sovereignty through treaties.

SPEAKER_01: 25:14

So the brother said, uh, so Spain and Portugal came first, but France was the first to survey the land?

SPEAKER_03: 25:21

No, no, that that portion of the land. That portion of the land, not all that portion. Spain had what is now known as the West Coast. When Spain conquered the West Coast, California, Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, Colorado. That's that was that's New Spain. That Spain conquered that. France had the Louisiana territory and Canada.

SPEAKER_06: 25:54

So Spain, yeah, Spain uh surveyed the land. Yes, for their, you know, for their claim.

SPEAKER_03: 26:01

Yes, for their claim.

SPEAKER_06: 26:03

Portugal surveyed the land for their claim. France would survey the land for their claim.

SPEAKER_03: 26:07

And then the Dutch surveyed the land. The Dutch surveyed the land for their claim, and then Great Britain took over. Great Britain took over the the 1664 when Great Britain defeated the Dutch. So that New York, Harlem. That's that's a Dutch word. When it was Amsterdam, New Amsterdam, Harlem, Harlem is a Dutch word.

SPEAKER_06: 26:27

Dutch, yeah.

SPEAKER_03: 26:28

Yeah, New Amsterdam. So New Amsterdam was changed to York. York, New York, Duke of York. That's the Duke of York. That's Duke of York is um now with King James II. King James II is Duke of York. Wait, was Duke of York when his when his father, when his brother died in 1682, the Duke of York, King James, that's the James II ascended to the throne as King James II in 1682. Of England. Of England, yes. That this is the United States, the very claim that they're making the claim, that this is the United States. The maps, 2025 map. What is their claim based then? We're showing that. We're talking today. This is the basis of their claim that this is the United States. We could talk to it, no matter who they are, because this is the basis of their claim.

SPEAKER_06: 28:01

Yeah, similar to similar to uh to a deed to a house. Once that deed is transferred, you know, one of the things.

SPEAKER_02: 28:08

Yeah, same thing. Chain of custody. Exactly, chain of custody.

SPEAKER_06: 28:13

Name the house what they want to name it.

SPEAKER_03: 28:17

And you go back and use it what they call the title search, title search, and it shows you, you know, a hundred years, you know, it's been transfers exactly through title search.

SPEAKER_02: 28:31

Same, same, same concept. Yeah.

SPEAKER_03: 28:37

Remember, the people aren't people the the that includes the Europeans, are not and are not groomed to think this way because they're groomed colonization no more. Colonization ended. When Great Britain, when the United States defeated Great Britain, no more colonization, colonization is no more. United States is, you know, yeah, this great country, United States, colonization isn't all over. Colonization ended in 17 when in the revolutionary war, colonization ended.

SPEAKER_06: 29:05

When they stopped calling themselves colonies, yeah.

SPEAKER_03: 29:07

That's the thing because they stopped using that word. Right. Exactly. Yeah, you don't go by that. You go by what we what we're how we're presenting it.

SPEAKER_06: 29:19

The elements, the principles.

SPEAKER_03: 29:26

And that and that's deliberate, though. This the way how we're teaching this, it's deliberate because they don't want people to have this this this concept that we're presenting. And then another thing point I want to make in uh I want to say to you, Ron, I want I wanted to say at this beginning, is that there this is a this is a service to the people. People conscious that all right, that's conscious more, unconscious more as Europeans. They only, some people only only, there's some that's includes Europeans. Conscious and unconscious more. They only see offering service to the people as giving them food. But this is a service. Educating people is a service. You're providing a service, Ron. We be clear. Only like because you ain't giving out food. This is food. This is mental food. This is a service. You're providing services. This is services. Education is a service. And then you know what I mean.

SPEAKER_04: 30:44

No, no, we don't accept they don't know what I mean. Education is a service.

SPEAKER_03: 30:51

Meaning, you mean I'm putting this on equal footing and people giving their food. I'm putting this on equal footing and that to that.

SPEAKER_01: 31:02

We got a creator of boundaries universe. Thank you for the two dollars. Much appreciated. Any any anything given to us, we we appreciate it. Absolutely. A dollar to 20 cents. It doesn't matter. Just, you know, your eyes, your ears, whatever. The brother said uh fraudulent conveyance of title or deed. Okay.

SPEAKER_03: 31:27

I guess he's talking about uh this is not a I mean, what um what that's not a this is not a fraudulent conveyance of title or deed.

unknown: 31:35

Yeah.

SPEAKER_01: 31:37

That's not I don't think that's going on right now, brother.

SPEAKER_03: 31:40

Yeah, yeah. I'm trying to because he put that up there for I'm trying for some reason, but this is not a fraudulent fraud. No, no, I'm saying that we're talking about conquest now. This is not it's conquest, but it's not a it wouldn't be all right, meaning that for from from France to Spain, it's not a fraud and conveyance of title of deed.

SPEAKER_01: 32:07

Now I want to ask you this. I want to okay, so let me go ahead. France and Spain, how was the uh United States able to acquire territorial sovereignty of that area? Was it done through paperwork? Was it done through a deal?

SPEAKER_03: 32:24

The Louisiana Purchase Treaty, Louisiana Purchase Treaty, 1803, yes, session treaties, those types of treaties, session treaties. Yeah, session treaties, the session, transfer of one transfer of land uh from one state to another, session. And those treaties become the titles. Treaties become title. That's not a fraudulent conveyance of title, not from one, not from one to them. It's still it's conquest, but from France to the United States is not a fraudulent conveyance of title. That transfer is not a fraudulent conveyance of title from United States from France to the United States. Now, if he's talking the conquest, yes, we explained that. We explained that it's conquest that France conquered. We explained all that, but we will make it clear that the transfer from France to Spain is not a fraudulent conveyance of um conveyance of title or deed. Right. We'll make that very clear.

SPEAKER_01: 33:24

Okay. Now, uh this says, can you speak briefly on the United States versus the corporate United States, the relationship, the difference, the significance or lack thereof? All right. Let me yes, yes.

SPEAKER_03: 33:41

Um Israel, we're gonna have to do something, a presentation, because the the concepts, they don't have their concept, proper concepts.

SPEAKER_01: 33:50

Uh can could we could do it on that?

SPEAKER_03: 33:53

Yeah, we're gonna, yeah. I'm gonna give about a minute or two discussion, and then we'll do a whole presentation on it.

unknown: 33:58

Okay.

SPEAKER_03: 33:59

It's not you know, we'll do a whole presentation on this. All right. What they're calling, that's so 1871. This is where he's going. 1871, 1913, uh Delaware, uh uh Florida, you know. All right, so an act of Congress, the act of Congress of 1871. So you say corporate United States. Congress is a creature of the Constitution. Clear on that. So Congress was drafted in the 1787, yeah. Congress was drafted in the Constitution. For the government, yeah. Yes, and that it's a creature of the Constitution. Any legislation, a a the corporate United States, 1871, is a creature of Congress. The Constitution does not give Congress the power to delegate United States legislative power, United States judicial power, United States executive power, Article I, Section One of the United States Constitution. That's United States legislative power shall be vested. United States legislative power shall be vested. BES, they don't know where the word vested. That's the key is they don't know the word vested. BES, the key is understanding the word vested. That means fixed. Not invested, vested. It means fixed, fixed. So Congress cannot create another United States and transfers that vested power that lies with that's that lies within the United States Congress. The Article 2 section is not all that. It's not all that. They don't know the principles. That's all. Ron, what I'm saying ain't all that. They don't understand principles. They're not grounded in principles. I'm not saying anything's complicated.

SPEAKER_06: 36:34

I didn't comprehend it until I started comprehending the principles.

SPEAKER_03: 36:38

Tell them, Israel. Yeah, that's how you got it. Yeah, foundation.

SPEAKER_01: 36:45

Yeah.

SPEAKER_03: 36:45

Thank you. That's the found that's the foundation. They don't, they're not grounded in the foundation, Ron. It ain't hard. They ain't stupid. They ain't dumb. They ain't slow. They have been taught misconceptions, and they have not been grounded in the foundation. That's all. They can learn it like that. They can learn it like that. Focus on the foundation. So we the word is vested. It means fixed, inherited. So you have the Article 2, Section 1 of the United States Constitution. The executive power of the United States executive power shall be vested in the presidency of the United States of America. Article 3, section one. The United States judicial power shall be vested in one Supreme Court. The word is vested. That's the key word. So I want to go to the Constitution in the highlight, circle, red, whatever you need to do, the word vested. That the most important word in Article One, Section One, Article One, Section, Article 2, Section 1, Article 3, the most important word is vested. If they understand vested, they got it.

SPEAKER_06: 38:15

Somebody put the definition of vested in the in the comments. They got it. Just vested.

SPEAKER_03: 38:25

Just focus on that vested. You understand that you got it. Because you know, by understanding that, vested, you know that Congress cannot legislate anything, nothing, and then delegate that power because Congress is a creature of the Constitution.

SPEAKER_04: 38:48

I mean, that's it. I just gave foundation.

SPEAKER_03: 38:51

I don't even say anything else. The key is foundation. Once you go to the foundation, you kill everything else. I killed it by going to the foundation. See how simple that is? I'm showing them that ain't all that. They're reading all that because they don't have the found, they don't, they don't understand principles. Congress is a creature of the Constitution. So those article, the the the act of Congress of 1871 is a creature of the Cost, it's a creature of Congress. I don't need to read it. What I'm gonna read it for. That const that United States ain't got more power than the United States than the that which is in that we like, we the people of the United States. Here we go. We the people of the United States. All right, here we go. Then the preamble, we the people of the United States, you got United States there. Article one, Article one, section one, you have the United States there. In the legislative of the United States, you have the United States there. Article two, section one, you got the United States there. Uh the uh the uh executive power of the United States executive power should be vested in the presidency of the United States of America. You have the United States there, United States of America. You have uh Article III, these letter things, judicial power shall be invested in one Supreme Court in the United States, you got United States there. So what so and the other United States don't have constitutional authority. You have you have the you have United States in the Articles of Confederation, United States of America, the style name should be United States of America. You have United States in Article I of the 1783 Defending the Peace Treaty, United States, all 13 in name. Got United States there. So you mean to tell me that these other United States that created by Congress has more authority than that which is vested, that's vested power? Then you once you understand Congress. Oh no. Yeah, yeah, it's I don't care nothing about I don't care nothing about those other United States. Why should I care? Why should you care? You should care about the one that has constitutional power, authority. That's the why y'all worrying about these other United States because y'all don't have foundation. That's why. Shouldn't you want to be worried about the one that has constitutional authority? Huh? Like, why would you worry about the other United States?

SPEAKER_02: 41:53

Who gives a crap?

SPEAKER_06: 41:54

You're gonna worry about congressional authority.

SPEAKER_03: 42:07

See, once you step off of that foundation, then you can be had. Once you don't, because you don't have that, they don't have foundation, um Israel. Yeah, so they get they're caught up with all the other stuff. They can be, you can you can tell they can be easily misled. You can tell. They can be easily be misled, they can just say anything, they can just say anything. Yeah, and that's what the problem is. Yeah, we'll definitely uh zoom in on that. Yeah, we'll zoom in on that, yeah. But yeah, we can we we can move on. I just wanted to go straight to foundation. I don't I don't know why I was the teacher because it's the only way.

SPEAKER_06: 42:54

So uh so this is the 1763 Treaty of Paris between France and Great Britain. Article 4. His most Christian Majesty renounces all pretensions which he has heretofore formed or might have formed to Nova Scotia or Acadia in all its parts and guarantees the whole of it and and with all its dependencies to the King of Great Britain. Moreover, or moreover, his most Christian Majesty cedes and guarantees to his said Britannic Majesty in full right Canada with all its dependencies, as well as the island of Cape Breton, and all the other islands and coasts in the Gulf and River of St. Lawrence, and in general, everything that depends on the said countries, lands, islands, and coasts, with the sovereignty, property, possession, and all rights acquired by treaty or otherwise which the most Christian king and the crown of France have had have had till now over the said countries, lands, islands, places, coasts, and their inhabitants, so that the most Christian king seeds cedes and makes over the whole to the said king and to the crown of Great Britain, and that and that in the most ample ample manner and form, without restriction, and without any liberty to depart from the said session and guarantee under any pretense or to disturb Great Britain in the possessions above mentioned. His Britannic Majesty on his side agrees to grant the liberty of the Catholic religion to the inhabitants of Canada. He will, in consequence, give the most precise and most effectual orders that his new Roman Catholic subjects may profess the worship of their religion according to the rights of the Roman church as far as the laws of Great Britain permit. His Britannic Majesty father agrees that the French inhabitants or others who have been subjects of the most Christian king in Canada may retire with all safety and freedom wherever they shall think proper, and may sell their estates, provided it be to the subjects of his Britannic Majesty, and bring away their effects as well as the prep their persons without being restrained in their immigration under their under any pretense whatsoever, except that of debts or of criminal prosecutions. The term limited for this immigration shall be fixed to the space of 18 months to be computed from the day of the exchange of the ratification of the present treaty. Continuation, 1763, Treaty of Paris between France and Great Britain, but this is Article 6. So we just read Article 4. Now we're reading Article 6 of the same treaty. The King of Great Britain seized the islands of Saint Pierre and Maculin, Maculin, in full right to his most Christian Majesty to serve as a shelter to the French fishermen. And his said most Christian Majesty engages not to fortify the said islands, to erect no buildings upon them, but merely for the conveniency of the fishery and to keep upon them a guard of fifty men only for the police. This is Article 7 of the same treaty. In order to re-establish peace on solid and durable foundations and to remove for forever all subject of dispute with regard to the limits of the British and French territories on the continent of America, it is agreed that for the future, the confines between the dominions of his Britannic Majesty and those of his most Christian Majesty in that part of the world shall be fixed irrevocably by a line drawn along the middle of the river Mississippi, from its source to the river Iberville, and from thence by a line drawn along the middle of this river, and the lakes Marepis, Maurapas, and the Pontchart Ponchartrin, the Ponchartrain, Ponchartrain to the sea. And for this purpose, the most Christian king sees in full right and guarantees to his Britannic Majesty the river and port of the Mobile and everything which he possesses or ought to possess on the left side of the river Mississippi, except the town of New Orleans and the island in which it is situated, which shall remain to France, provided that the navigation of the river Mississippi shall be equally free, as well to the subjects of Great Britain as to those of France, and in its whole breadth and length, from its source to the sea, and expressly that part which is between the said island of New Orleans and the right bank of that river, as well as the passage both in and out of its mouth. It is farther stipulated that the vessels belonging to the subjects of either nation shall not be stopped, visited, or subjected to any pay to the payment of any duty whatsoever. The stipulations asserted in the fourth article in favor of the inhabitants of Canada shall also take place with regard to the inhabitants of the countries ceded by this article. Then we have Article 6, where the most Christian King cedes and guarantees to his Britannic Majesty and for right the islands of Grenada and the Grenadade Grenadines with the same stipulations in favor of the inhabitants of this colony, inserted in the fifth in the fourth article of for those of Canada, and the part and the partition of the islands called neutral as is agreed and fixed so that the so that those of St. Vincent, Dominico, and Tobago shall remain in full right to Great Britain, and that of St. Lucia shall be delivered to France to enjoy the same likewise in full right, and the high contracting parties guarantee the partition so stipulated. This is Article 10, same treaty, his Britannic Majesty shall restore to France the island of Gori and the condition it was and when it was in when conquered, and his most Christian Majesty cedes in full right and guarantees to the King of Great Britain the River Senegal with the forts and factories of St. Louis, Podor, and Galaam, and with all the rights and dependencies of the sad river Senegal.

SPEAKER_01: 49:41

Peace, y'all hear me?

SPEAKER_06: 49:43

Yeah, okay.

SPEAKER_01: 49:45

Yeah, uh my my internet just I don't know what happened. Oh man, just a just a lot of people on my internet right now. Anyway, go ahead. My bad. Sorry about that.

SPEAKER_06: 49:59

Good. So yeah, so this is article 20 of the same treaty in consequence of the restitution stipulated in the.

SPEAKER_01: 50:06

Oh, and I forgot to say, I just want to say this real quick. I got trolls in the chat who um just want to troll because I know what they're trolling about. You can't do nothing, man. You're a hater. Stop it. You gotta stop, man. You're not gonna stop. You're not gonna stop me what I'm doing. You're a hater. Keep it going. Do your uh uh do keep going and keep just keep trolling. You can troll as long as you can, as long as you want. I'ma just keep blocking you. You know, when you have a when you have when when when you have a channel and when you're out in the public, people will like troll you and it's like come on now.

SPEAKER_02: 51:04

Yeah, yeah.

SPEAKER_01: 51:05

Come on now.

SPEAKER_03: 51:08

They don't have anything to anything positive to offer. I mean, add value to what we're doing. I mean, like you tearing, what are you tearing down for? We trying to use we build it.

SPEAKER_06: 51:19

Yeah, right. Any claims, just use evidence to support your claims.

SPEAKER_01: 51:24

That's you know please, please. If you have if you have any, if you have any evidence to support your claim, please put it up there because uh my name is my name Ron Brown is on the internet like crazy. I've been with the same people for years, doing the same thing for years. So keep going, man, with that. Come on, man. What happens is people get uh stuff happens. Yeah, hold on. Yeah, I hold on. Okay, okay. Drop a link and I will post the information. Post it right in the comments. I don't even know why I'm entertaining this. It doesn't even make sense because uh I know me and my history, and everybody around me know me and my history, so this foolishness about being an agent is stupid.

SPEAKER_03: 52:18

Yeah, you ain't no agent, brother. You ain't no agent. Hell with that.

SPEAKER_06: 52:21

I don't think an agent's gonna let us present this much uh information. Hell no, hell no, leaving it down like this in auto, no way, no way, no way.

SPEAKER_03: 52:35

We've been on this platform, we've been on this platform since April of this year.

SPEAKER_06: 52:39

We didn't make the information up, you know.

SPEAKER_03: 52:41

Yeah, we've been Ron has opened his platform. In fact, Ron reached out to me in the in March of this year. He reached out to me and offered the platform.

SPEAKER_06: 52:50

What you say in the last the last episode of do leave said, bring the FBI on, we can teach them, they can learn something.

SPEAKER_03: 52:55

Oh, yeah, yeah. Oh, don't know. They will learn, they don't know this. Oh, they don't know this. Oh, yeah, they're gonna learn.

SPEAKER_01: 53:02

Yo, and whoever is that you you do the clowns, you got nothing else better to do. You don't have a life, you're a loser, you're a loser with the L like this on your head. Oh my god, woman, do something with your life, you clown. Uh yeah, my bad. Go ahead, y'all.

SPEAKER_02: 53:24

Sorry, yeah, yeah.

SPEAKER_06: 53:27

Okay, all right, back to the scheduled program. Well, article 20 of the same treaty, you know, 1763 Treaty of Paris between France and Great Britain. Uh, in consequence of the restitution stipulated in the preceding article, his Catholic Majesty cedes and guarantees in full right to his Britannic Majesty, Florida, with St. with Fort St. Augustine and the Bay of Pensacola, as well as all that Spain possesses on the continent of North America, to the east or to the southeast of the River Mississippi, and in general, everything that depends on the said countries and lands with the sovereignty, property, possessions, and all rights acquired by treaties or otherwise, which the Catholic King and the Crown of Spain have had till now over the said countries, lands, places, and their inhabitants, so that the Catholic King cedes and makes over the whole to the said king and to the crown of Great Britain, and that in the most ample manner and form. His Britannic Majesty agrees on his side to grant to the inhabitants of the countries above seated the liberty of the Catholic religion. He will consequently give the most expressed and the most effectual orders to his new Roman Catholic subjects, may that his new Roman Catholic subjects may profess the worship of their religion according to the rights of the Roman church as far as the laws of Great Britain permit. His Britannic Majesty's father agrees that the Spanish inhabitants or others who have been subjects of the Catholic King in the said country may retire with all safety and freedom wherever they think proper, and may sell their estates, provided it to be provided it be to his Britannic Majesty's subjects, and bring away their effects as well as their persons without being restrained in their immigration under their pretense whatsoever whatsoever, except that of debts or of criminal prosecutions, the term limited for this immigration being fixed to the space of 18 months to be computed from the day of the exchange of the ratifications of the present treaty. It is moreover, was it moreover stipulated that his Catholic Majesty should have power to cause all the effects that may belong to him to be brought away, whether it be artillery or other things? So, question Did France and Great Britain return conquered and colonized land to the indigenous people of the said land, or did France and Great Britain continue to keep the conquered lands under colonial occupation by ceding and retroceding lands to each other in Articles 4, 6, 7, 9, 10, and 20, which is what we just what I just read, of the 1763 Treaty of Paris between France and Great Britain? The answer is the second part. France and Great Britain continue to keep the conquered lands under colonial occupation by ceding and retroceding lands to each other in Articles 4, 6, 7, 9, 10, and 20 of the 1763 Treaty of Paris between France and Great Britain. So we're reading in the treaties that like we're seeing it with our own eyes that France, Great Britain, you know, none of these colonial powers ceded the land or retroceded uh ceded the land back to the uh indigenous people. They kept it amongst themselves. 1800 third treaty, uh, third treaty of San Adefonso. Article III, his Catholic Majesty promises and undertakes on his part to retrocede to the French Republic six months after the full and entire execution of the of the above conditions and provisions regarding his royal highness, the Duke of Parma, the colony of province of Louisiana, with the same extent that it that it now has in the hands of Spain and that it had when France possessed it, and such as it ought to be, according to the treaty, subse subsequently concluded between Spain and other states. So did Spain return the conquered and colonized land to the indigenous people of the said land, or did Spain continue to keep the conquered land under colonial occupation by retroceding it to France in Article III of the 1800 third Treaty of San and Defenso? And the answer is the second part Spain continued to keep the conquered land under colonial occupation by retroceding it to France in the Article III of the 1800 Third Treaty, in the 1800, the third treaty of San Edifonso. So this is 1783 definitive peace treaty between Great Britain and the United States. Article one. His Britannic Majesty acknowledges the said United States, viz. New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Bay, Rhode Island, and Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia to be free and independent states that he treats with them as such, and for himself, his heirs, and successors relinquishes all claims to the government propriety and territorial rights of the same and every part thereof.

SPEAKER_04: 58:57

And this is 1783.

SPEAKER_06: 59:00

Yeah. Continuation, this is Article 2 of the same treaty, and that all disputes which might arise in future on the subject of the boundaries, the boundaries of the said United States may be prevented. It is hereby agreed and declared that the following are and shall be their boundaries, viz. From the northwest angle of Nova Scotia, viz. that angle which is formed by a line drawn due north from the source of St. Croix River to the highlands along the said highlands, which divided those rivers that empty themselves into the river St. Lawrence, from those which fall into the Atlantic Ocean to the northwesternmost head of Connecticut River, thence down along the middle of the river to the 45th degree of north latitude, from thence by a line due west on said latitude until it strikes the river Iroquois or Ketterquit. Along the middle of Said River into Lake Ontario, through the middle of Said Lake until it strikes the communication by water between the lake and Lake Erie. Then along the middle of said communication into Lake Erie, through the middle of said lake until it arrives at water at the water communication between that lake and Lake Huron. Thence along the middle of said water communication into the Lake Huron, thence through the middle of said lake to the water communication between the lake and Lake Superior, thence through Lake Superior northward.