Did the U.S. and Morocco merge into ONE NATION??? - Abdullah Bey & Yisrael Bey

People repeat the claim that the United States and Morocco “merged” so often that it starts to feel like history. We slow it down and ask the only question that matters in law: where is the instrument that actually transfers political authority, merges territory, or changes citizenship?

We walk through the difference between a peace and friendship treaty and a unification treaty, using plain-language legal tests you can apply to any big historical claim. If two nations truly consolidate, the paperwork is unmistakable: express intent to unite, a shared constitutional order, a clear territorial effect, citizenship changes, lawful ratification, and transition rules for courts, taxes, debts, and records. That standard is why friendship language, trade cooperation, and “good relations” cannot be stretched into a single government.

From there, we address specific misconceptions that circulate in movement spaces, including readings of the US Constitution’s preamble and symbolic “proof” drawn from the one dollar bill and the Great Seal. We compare the US Morocco treaty record including the 1786 Treaty of Peace and Friendship and the modern US Morocco Free Trade Agreement against real-world unification examples like Yemen and Germany, where treaty text and domestic votes spell out exactly what changes and when.

If you care about international law, treaty interpretation, sovereignty, and evidence-based history, this is a practical framework you can reuse. Subscribe for part two, share this with someone who loves big claims, and leave a review with the strongest document you think supports the merger story.

Transcript

Welcome And Framing The Claim

SPEAKER_03 0:12

What's going on, everybody out there? It is Ron in the building. Uh, of course, fitness professional, you all know that. Uh, uh massage therapist, if you didn't know, massage therapist, blah, blah, blah. Anyway, we're here for uh brother uh Abdullah Bey, Yasrill Bey. Um, I like that he has the Morris Civil letter up there right now. And uh, first off, I haven't seen your brothers in a little while. How y'all doing, man? I was well, brother.

SPEAKER_02 0:43

Oh, absolutely, brother. I brother's an honor, brother. Thank you. We've been what uh we've been riding with you since uh March of last year.

SPEAKER_03 0:51

Yes, sir, yes, sir. Thank you, thank you for uh uh uh joining the channel, man. Um, you know, I've learned a lot from your channel, even though I don't really say it much. I just keep a lot in here, and I just go, all right, now like I just see the world from a different perspective. You get what I'm saying? So so man, and and you know, um I I think that your message should be everywhere, it should be everywhere, you know. Um, linguistics, you know, the different parts of language, and you know, uh uh um what what was the glass of what was the Yaswell? You know this one, you know, this is my favorite one hypoglossal nerve. Hypoglossal nerve, brother. I'm working on this hyperglossal nerve all next week, you know, because I realized that that that nerve would also help me with talking and speech, and you know, uh, I'll be able to articulate myself better for people to understand, you know what I'm saying?

SPEAKER_01 1:54

Indeed.

SPEAKER_03 1:55

Yeah, so um today we're talking about did the US and Morocco merge into one nation. That that's a great topic, uh, because I think there's a lot of misconceptions around that, and uh, you brothers had the floor to clear it up.

SPEAKER_01 2:12

Okay, uh, need you to share the screen, share the presentation. Oh, hold on. Do this. There we go. All right, okay.

Treaty Union Or Merger Defined

SPEAKER_00 2:31

So tonight's presentation lesson topic is treaty union or merger. The legal difference between friendship and political consolidation. So a treaty can create peace, trade, alliance, friendship, protection, or cooperation, but a unification treaty or declaration of merger must clearly transfer political authority, merge territory, create a new state, or place one state under the constitutional order of another. So we're gonna get into the philosophy, principles, and the elements of the unification treaty. So philosophy. The philosophy behind this lesson is simple. A treaty is evidence of consent between governments, but the type of consent determines the legal effect. A peace treaty does not equal a merger, a friendship treaty does not equal one government, a trade treaty does not equal shared nationality. A unification treaty must clearly say that political authority, territory, constitution, government powers, or citizenship structures are being joined. The Vienna Convention principle is that a state's consent to be bound by a treaty is expressed through recognized acts such as signature, ratification, acceptance, approval, accession, or exchange of instruments. United Nations legal affairs. That means legal consequences must be proven by the instrument itself, not assumed from friendship language. So we get into the principles. Number one, sovereignty is not surrendered by implication. Two governments can be friends, allies, trading partners, or treaty partners and still remain separate sovereigns. Two, treaty language controls the legal effect, a treaty of peace creates peace, a treaty of commerce creates commercial rules, a treaty of union creates union.

SPEAKER_03 4:24

Okay, real quick before we continue, I just want to go back and go to the sovereign part. So

Sovereignty Without The Internet Myths

SPEAKER_03 4:30

now when with what when I hear sovereign, the first thing I think of is the sovereign citizen movement. So I just wanted to ask the question uh would you say that your views align with that movement or no or no?

SPEAKER_00 4:46

No, it's nowhere near that the views of that movement. We're actually breaking down sovereignty, we're breaking this stuff down by philosophy, principles, and elements. So sovereignty is the collective of the people. The people's the people could they they group their sovereignty together collectively, invest it into a government in return for protection, right? So that's the sovereignty we're talking about, the popular sovereignty.

SPEAKER_02 5:10

That's popular sovereignty, yeah.

SPEAKER_00 5:13

Okay, okay. So, yeah, we're not talking about sovereignty in the sense of no government has authority of anyone. That's that's the sovereign citizen aspect. Gotcha. All right, so well yeah, number three, merger requires express political language. A true merger normally uses language such as shall be united into one kingdom, shall form a united republic, shall accede to the federal republic, shall form a sovereign federal state, shall be represented in one parliament. Number four, separate parties mean separate governments. The Morocco U.S. treaties repeatedly treat Morocco and the United States as two separate parties with separate citizens, subjects, vessels, ports, consuls, and governments. You can see the Evelyn project. Number five, trade cooperation is not political consolidation. The U.S. Morocco Free Trade Agreement improves market access and commercial opportunity. It does not create one legislature, one court system, one citizenship, or one territorial government. So now we're gonna get into the elements.

The Merger Checklist That Matters

SPEAKER_00 6:30

Elements of a true unification treaty or merger declaration. To prove a real governmental merger, look for these elements. Number one, name parties, two or more existing governments or states. Number two, express intent to unite. Language saying they merge, unite, accede, or form one state. Number three, political structure, one parliament, one executive, one constitution, or one federal system. Number four, territorial effect, a clear statement that territory is joined or placed under one constitutional order. Number five, citizenship or subject status effect. People become citizens or subjects of the new or enlarged state. Number six, ratification, approval by lawful political bodies, parliaments, councils, referendum or authorized representatives. And number seven, transition rules, laws, courts, debts, taxes, military property, offices, and records are recognized. The Morocco U.S. relationship lacks those merger elements. So core question. Do you want to build on that, brother? We get into the question.

SPEAKER_02 7:45

Let's go. You got this. We can go. Yes. Well, yes. Um

The Constitution Misread In Movements

SPEAKER_02 7:51

in the what's been taught as the misconception and the preamble to the United States Constitution is that we the people of the United States refers to the Moors in Morocco. And a do and do ordain and more and more perfect union refers to with as far as the misconception is concerned, it refers to a unification between Morocco and the United States. More perfect union. These are misconceptions. Do ordain this constitution for the United States of America. So the misconception in this Moorish movement regarding the United States Constitution is that the Moors created this constitution, established the United States Constitution, or they call quote unquote Moorish Constitution for the United States to operate in our land. So that is a clear misconception. So what that would mean is that the 13 original states did not form into a union. That the 13 original states did not, that this that the that the treaty, that the constitution was not drafted alone by the 13 original states. So this is a clear misconception. And I taught this misconception for 27 years. That is a thinking process. I went through parody.

SPEAKER_00 10:41

The clear

What The US Morocco Record Shows

SPEAKER_00 10:42

answer: no. Based on the known public treaty record, the United States and Morocco have a treaty relationship, not a governmental merger. The major instruments are treaties of peace, friendship, commerce, protection, consul relations, and trade, not instruments creating one shared government. The 1786 Morocco-United States Treaty expressly calls itself a treaty of peace and friendship and refers to both sides as separate parties. It deals with war, commerce, ships, protection, consuls, and disputes, not a merger of sovereignty. The 1836 Treaty likewise calls itself a treaty of peace with the Americans and again treats the United States and Morocco as separate parties. The modern U.S. Morocco Free Trade Agreement, signed in 2004 and effective in 2006, is a trade agreement reducing barriers and expanding commercial opportunities, not a political union. Lesson thesis: Unification Treaty. An international agreement between states to replace conflict conflict and legal rules with a single uniform set of laws or to merge two or more states into one political and legal entity. See applications of Unification Treaty below. So application of unification treaty for two or more nations to merge into one single new nation, to merge into a single new nation is generally a multi-stage task involving both internal domestic legal changes and external international legal agreements. Because there is no overarching governing body setting specific rules for this process, sovereign states must create their own legal framework for unification. In other words, both or all parties must pass domestic legislation, such as a merger act, within their respective legal framework to voluntarily relinquish their separate international personality and establish a common constitution, followed by a unification treaty signed between the two or more independent states.

SPEAKER_02 13:16

Does that exist? That the United States and Congress assemble have a legislation that they were going to a unification or declaration or merger legislation that they would agree to merge with the Moroccan Empire as one country. Did the Moroccan Empire, Emperor, Muhammad ibn Abdullah draft the same? That's to be done first. So Ron, I must again, there was no thinking on my part for 27 years. I'm thinking about it now. I didn't think about, I didn't know this. I didn't even know to think about this. I didn't even know to. I just all I was doing was re and what I'm repeating it or parenting. These conscious boys are doing what I did. They're still doing it. They're parenting. They're not thinking. They don't know this. This is why we're doing this. Is why this is a major in fact. This is this is an excerpt from um from a book that uh um one of the books that Israel are working on addressing the misconceptions in the Morse movement. And we've done we've done part of that on this platform as well as others.

SPEAKER_03 14:52

Right.

SPEAKER_00 14:57

All right, so let's look at a couple of examples of the unification treaties. So Yemen's

What Real Unification Treaties Include

SPEAKER_00 15:06

April 22nd, 1990, unification treaty agreement establishing a union between the state of Yemen, Arab Republic, and the state of the People's Democratic Republic of Yemen. This agreement establishing a union culminated in the full unification of North Yemen, Yemen Arab Republic, and South Yemen, People's Democratic Republic of Yemen, declared on May 22, 1990, to form the Republic of Yemen, creating a transitional period for political and economic integration, establishing a unified parliament and presidential council, and laying groundwork for multi-party democracy. Single state with shared legislative, executive, and judicial powers establishing an interim presidential council and setting the stage for the first multi-party elections in 1993. And then we have Germany. Germany's August 31st, 1990 Treaty on the final settlement with respect to Germany, the core agreement of this unification treaty in Egens Wertrag between East and West Germany that detailed the process of East Germany joining the Federal Republic, adopting West German laws, and establishing the new federal states, which was followed by the two plus four agreement. East Germany and West Germany, the two, and the four World War II Allied powers, US, UK, France, Soviet Union, the four, signed on September 12, 1990, in Moscow, which granted full sovereignty and ended the occupation rights. On October 3rd, 1990, German reunification officially took effect. German Unity Day. See Germany's Unification Treaty of August 31st, 1990, articles below. So I took a couple articles out of there so we can see the language. This is the abstract of it, though, uh, first. The unification treaty was the result of intense negotiations between the GDR and the FRG. It provided for the recognization of the GDR's administrative districts, Berserk, and into five federal states, Bundesländer, that would accede to the Federal Republic of Germany under the terms of Article 23 of the basic law. The treaty also addressed a mirage, a myriad of legal and financial issues entailed in the introduction of the federal republic's political, economic, and social structures in the new eastern states. So Article 1, lander, uh Article 1, Section 1, upon the accession of the German Democratic Republic to the Federal Republic of Germany, in accordance with Article 23 of the basic law, taking effect on 3rd October 1990, the lander of Brandenburg, Mecklenburg, Western, Pomerania, Saxony, Saxony, Anhalt, and Thuringia shall become lander of the Federal Republic of Germany. Number two, the 23 boroughs of Berlin of Berlin shall form Land Berlin. Article 4. Amendments of the basic law resulting from a session. The basic law of the Federal Republic of Germany shall be amended as follows. Number one, the preamble shall read as follows, conscious of their responsibility before God and men, animated by the resolve to serve world peace as an equal partner in the un in a united Europe. The German people have adopted, by virtue of their constituent power, this basic law. The Germans in the lander of Baden, Wurttemberg, Bavaria, Berlin, Brandenburg, Bremen, Hamburg, Hesse, Lower Saxony, Mecklenburg, Western Pomerania, North Rhine, Slash Westphalia, Rhineland, Palatinate, Saarland, Saxony, Saxony Anhalt, Schleswig, Holstein, and Thuringia have achieved the unity and freedom of Germany and free self-determination. This basic law is thus valid for the entire German people. Yeah, it's kind of out of place, but yeah.

The One Dollar Bill Seal Misconception

SPEAKER_00 19:25

You want to go ahead and touch on this, Brother Abdullah? The one Federal Reserve note would act as a commemoration after the unification treaty between the United States and Morocco. Yes.

unknown 19:44

Yeah.

SPEAKER_02 19:45

And once again, all I was doing was parroting the pyramid underneath the pyramid. I'm just this is my parroting. Underneath the pyramid, you see the phrase the great steel. Underneath the eagle, you see the purposive phrase of the United States. So I would ask, and I did this over 500 times, pull it out on the you know, at work, you know, you name it, different people. And so I would ask, which one is the great seal of the United States? And they would point to the eagle. And I would say, Well, where does the phrase the great seal appear under the pyramid? And I would ask again, which one is the great seal of the United States? They point to the pyramid, I mean the eagle, and I'll ask again, well, where does the phrase the great seal appear under the pyramid? I've just gone through the lesson that I did for, you know. And so we do, so we were put, I was taught to place the folded to show so that it's actually one seal with two sides. The averse, which is the chief side, is the pyramid, and the reverse, which is the back or subordinate side, the eagle. One one nation, two sides. This is the lesson I gave. This is my spill that I did for 27 years. Keep in mind, I parried that. The lesson I just gave, I parroted it. This was this was taught, this was presented to me, and I just parroted it over and over and over and over and over again. No evidence, keep in mind, no evidence. I just parried it. I have to come like this, hoping that. Conscious morse who are listening to me that us now or listen to us later. That that would ring the bell that they're parenting they did on Abdullah Bay, that they're still doing Abdullah Bay, that they're parenting as I did for 27 years. Where's the evidence to support it? This is not evidence. The evidence would be a unification treaty or declaration of merger. This would represent a commemoration, which is not because meaning this graphic work is not evidence. So that means that they don't understand evidence. What type of evidence? This is you have to first, you have to show first show the unification treaty or declaration of merger. If that does exist, then this would represent a commemoration. But this alone.

SPEAKER_03 23:58

So that is not a great the great seal.

SPEAKER_04 24:03

Okay, all right.

SPEAKER_02 24:04

All right, let's put the whole let's put the whole lesson. The lesson is we gotta let's put it in got to put it in context. The lesson is that this is evidence that the Morocco and the United States merge as one country, merge into one country or nation. That the word one, let me I find incomplete. The word one means that this is a merger between the Moroccan Empire, which is the pyramid, and the United States, which is the ego, merging as a single, one single nation.

SPEAKER_03 24:52

Okay, so you said Morocco, this is evidence.

SPEAKER_02 24:55

No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. I just I'm saying that this is what I was taught. This is what I taught. Okay, gotcha. This is what I taught for 27 years as evidence, yeah. As evidence. I've this is what I'm not saying it is, I'm saying this is what I'm I have to, this is what I taught for 27 years. But it goes under the misconceptions. This is part of the misconception, that's the misconception framework. So I'm doing, I'm giving the people the misconception framework. That's not evidence. The evidence would be the unification treaty or declaration of merger, which it doesn't exist. Right. I was presenting this, Ryan, as that this is the evidence.

SPEAKER_01 25:43

Gotcha.

SPEAKER_02 25:44

All right, I just want to thank you for that. You know, any anything, you know, any point that you questions you have, Ron, please ask for clarification.

SPEAKER_03 25:53

So I have another one. So, what is that seal? Uh, and uh, what is the pyramid in which the eagle now?

SPEAKER_02 26:02

Well, I'm saying gray seal or what?

SPEAKER_03 26:04

Yeah, what is it?

SPEAKER_02 26:06

No, I don't know. Oh, okay. I have to I have to support the claim. Wow, whatever I say to you as a claim, whatever claim I make, you should ask me to support it. So if I say if I say Ron, that pyramid is the great seal of the Moroccan Empire, then you would ask me why you should ask me, Ron, Ron Abdullah, support your claim. Whatever I say, Ron, you should ask me to support my claim with with the with the with the evidence.

SPEAKER_03 26:38

Indeed. So that that's why I'm coming with the the extra questions.

SPEAKER_02 26:41

I don't have the evidence.

SPEAKER_03 26:43

Right, right. So that that's why I'm coming with the extra questions.

SPEAKER_02 26:46

Yeah, that's right. I don't have the evidence. I can't I can't make the claim. I I can't make the claim as I've done in the past that that pyramid is the great seal of the rock and empire. Ron, I don't have any evidence to support that claim.

unknown 27:06

Gotcha.

SPEAKER_02 27:07

I just want, like I said, I want conscious moons to hear me. I hope to wake them up out of the zomminess. I hope to wake them up out of that parody. Whatever your claim you make, support it so someone saw me that that pyramid is the great seal of the Moroccan Empire. That's all there's so many. I don't I don't want no Sammy Davis Jr., I don't want no Fred Esther, I want, I don't want no Dregory Hines, it ain't all that. It ain't all that. All I want is the documentary evidence to support the claim that that pyramid is the great seal, the governmental seal of the Moroccan Empire. Not no Fred Esther, not no Gregory Hines.

SPEAKER_03 28:12

Gotcha, got you. All right, we can continue on to the next slide.

SPEAKER_02 28:21

For those who don't know the reference to Fred Esther, Gregory Hines, Sammy Davis Jr., they were tap dancers. So they tap danced too. They sang, but they were also tap dancers.

SPEAKER_03 28:36

King L Base said that's uh copyright protections. Those are copyright protections.

SPEAKER_02 28:42

Yes, but it but make it clear that it's not evident that it's the great seal of the Moroccan Empire.

unknown 28:51

Right.

SPEAKER_02 28:51

That we would have that is that what was taught that I taught to thousands of people for 27 years is that pyramid is the great seal of the Moroccan Empire. All I did for 27 years to thousands of people is parried it. I didn't show a shred of documentary evidence the first. I'm keeping it real. I want the people to rise, my brothers and sisters. I want the people to rise. And I know that they can't rise if they don't for if they do not grow in epistemological reasoning. Epistemology is a branch of philosophy of how one knows knowledge. We must stimulate, we must stimulate critical thinking and epistemological reasoning. We don't want a bunch of parrots. You can't help us. You can't help us liberate our people by being a bunch of parrots.

SPEAKER_03 30:00

All right,

Evidence Standards And International Law

SPEAKER_03 30:01

now what's that? The uh Case Western Reserve University School of Law, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law.

SPEAKER_00 30:14

All right, so this is volume 13, issue two, article nine, nineteen eighty-one. Consensual merger as a means of state secession in its relation to treaty obligations. And this is by Ronald J. Klein. So consensual merger as a means of state secession in its relation to treaty obligations by Ronald J. Klein. Introduction. Modern-day states have become increasingly affected by various nations' implementation of social, economic, and military aid and subsequent regulation. As a result, maintenance of internationally agreed upon rights and obligations has become a vital goal, achievement of which should be sought through daily intergovernmental contact. This need for international stability has been threatened by the accelerated rate of state secession. The 20th century has witnessed consecutive decolonization and self-determination efforts fostered by various nationality groups. Each time a state secession occurs, the new state exhibits a completely new identity. This factor raises the question of how international relations can progress without a guarantee of bilateral or multilateral compliance with established rights. This note will examine some of the various forms of state secession, with particular emphasis on consensual merger. In addition, the analysis will specifically examine successor states' treaty rights in relation to customary international law and the newly drafted Vienna Convention on the Secession of States in respect of treaties. The United Arab Republic, UAR, a past consensual merger between Egypt and Syria, will be used as an example for the purpose of analysis throughout the note. The UAR, which was established in 1985, 1958, with the intent of creating a pan-Arab Empire, has been the most successful of the many Mideast merger attempts and will therefore serve as a help as a helpful model. Okay, yeah, yeah, okay. So state secession and its variations. That was part one. Introduction. So this is part two, state secession and its variations. The term secession of states is commonly used to describe the evolution of a state into a new or already established sovereign containing a sovereign containing an increased or diminished landmass. Personal unions, real unions, federations, confederations, and consensual mergers are but a few of the catalysts through which state secession occurs. Personal unions exist when states are independent, self-governing entities, but linked by the same ceremonial leader or ruler. A modern example of this form is the aggregate of Commonwealth countries under the British Crown. Both Canada and Australia, although separate states, owe allegiance to the crown of England because of their common historical tradition. Alternatively, real unions consist of two or more states possessing an intertwined governmental structure. The states share a leader, and many of their institutions are merged to deal as a single unit at the international level. For example, the Austria-Hungar Hungar, the Austria-Hungary-Hungary Empire during the years 1867 to 1918 was ruled, was ruled by a monarch monarch monarchical leader. However, the two states maintain separate legislatures, which were required to grant authority for the states to act jointly. A confederation exists between two or more states, remains separate. A confederation exists when two or more states remain separate and independent, but aggregate under a common central body to which they delegate certain limited powers. As a whole, the local units retain international acceptance as individual entities. The European Economic Community, which unites Western Europe and beyond, is an example of a successful economic confederation. On the other hand, the necessary elements of a federation are one division of powers between the central and the regional governments, and two, well, two, a certain degree of independence between the central and regional governments, three, direct action on the people by the central and regional governments, and four, some means of preserving the constitutional division of power. The central or federal government usually retains complete authority over foreign policy. In other words, an individual component of a federation cannot represent or bind the entire federation under a treaty. One scholar, Dr. James A. Crawford, explicitly requires a fifth criterion that the central government's powers include jurisdiction over all foreign affairs as well as autonomous authority, integrating aspects of the local states' internal policies. By stipulating this element, more structure is added to the federal to the federated unit. The United States is a working example of this theory and practice. So then we have University of Nebraska, Lincoln Digital, uh Digital Commons at University of Nebraska, uh Space Cyber and Tech Telecommunications Law Program for Faculty Publications, College of Law, The Unification of Germany and International Law. Franz von der Dunck, University of Nebraska, uh, and Peter H. Kuijman. Kuijemans.

SPEAKER_03 36:15

Hey brothers, I just realized my mic was off. I I was saying something. Um this document right here just it gives you it gives it to you. It explains it. It explains this whole subject pretty much in a nutshell, right? So um can you go up that the beginning? It was uh yeah, yeah, all the way to the top, just in case people want to go look for this. Okay, yeah. Yeah, there we go. Case wet. Let me uh take a picture of that right there.

SPEAKER_00 36:48

Yeah, the audience can definitely screenshot this and do further, you know, extensive research.

SPEAKER_03 36:55

Yeah, this is a good document right here.

SPEAKER_00 36:58

All right. Okay, so the unification of Germany and international law. It's number one, introduction, one Germany. The process of German unification, at least as far as its international legal aspects are concerned, is almost complete now. After the first staats verstrag, creating as of July 1, 1990, a monetary union between the Federal Republic of Germany, FRG, and the German Democratic Republic, GDR, the second stat uniting the two states as of October 3, legally sealed the inter-German aspects of the unification. At the same time, the September 12th treaty between the four former occupation powers, the United States, the Soviet Union, Great Britain, and France, and the two former occupied German states took care of the remaining international aspects, along with the treaty of friendship between the FRG and the Soviet Union, and the German Polish, the German-Polish Treaty on Boundaries and Friendly Relations. Then on December 2nd, the first all German free election elections were held. Number two, part two. Another important question is the legal significance of the Unification Treaty after October 3rd, 1990, when the German Democratic Republic no longer exists. The Unification Treaty is a treaty under public international law. When one party of such a bilateral treaty vanishes, who then is entitled to claim the rights given by the treaty against the other party? Article 44 of the Unification Treaty tries to tackle this problem by saying that the lander to be restored within the territory of the German Democratic Republic are entitled to assert the rights flowing from the Unification Treaty. The old traditional lander within the territory of the German Democratic Republic, Brandenburg, Mecklenburg, Western Pomerania, Saxony, Saxony-Anhalt, and Thuringia were abolished in 1953. They were restored on October 3, 1990. Ultimately, this means that those lander can sue the Federal Republic of Germany before the federal constitutional court for an alleged breach of the treaty. However, it is not altogether clear to what extent the provisions of Article 44 of the Unification Treaty preserve the rights of the German Democratic Republic as a party to the treaty. Article 45 of the Unification Treaty says that after German unification, the treaty continues to be valid as federal law. It can then be changed in principle by the legislative bodies of the Federal Republic of Germany. Otherwise, these provisions would stand eternally as a barrier against the sovereignty of Parliament.

SPEAKER_02 40:20

So

How Conjecture Becomes A Teaching

SPEAKER_02 40:21

where's this type of language in the United States Constitution? That will indicate between the that the Moroccan that the United States Constitution is a unification treaty between the Moroccan Empire and the United States.

SPEAKER_03 40:38

Like we're just making stuff up. Where did that come from, those teachings?

SPEAKER_02 40:49

I it is stated. I gotta answer it. Article six, article of the act was act five or act six of the constitution and bylaws of the Moore Science Temple of America. Being Moorish American, I think maybe Act Five, being Moorish American, you're part and parcel of this said government and must live the life accordingly. He asked me the question, that's the language. That's he asked me where it comes from. Like how where they like where they come from, like how you know, as far as all right, he said don't you know where where it come from um the that the the language? Like how did they conjecture that? How did where did where the conjecture come from?

SPEAKER_03 41:46

Hold on one second. So uh act five or act six. Being most American. All right, read it. Act six with us. All members must proclaim their nationality, and we are teaching our people their nationality and their divine creed, that they may know that they are part and partial of this said government, and know that they are not negroes, colored folks, black people, or Ethiopians, because these names were given to slaves by slaveholders in 1979 and lasted until 1865 during the time of slavery. But this is a new era of time now, and all men must and all men now must proclaim their free national name to be recognized by the government in which they live and the nations of the earth. This is the reason why Allah, the great God of the universe, ordained Nobu Jali, the prophet, to redeem his people from their sinful ways. The Moorish Americans are descendants of the ancient Moabites whom inhabited northwestern and southwestern shores of America. What's Act 5? Act before that. Read the Act before that. Act five, this organization uh this organization of Moorish Science Temple of America is not to cause any confusion or to overthrow the laws and constitution of the said government, but to obey hereby. Uh let me look at what you may be saying. Yeah, I think that's it. Um unless you're talking about the additional laws.

SPEAKER_02 43:29

It says, and must live the life accordingly. There's nothing that reads that must live the life accordingly. You read act five, you read act six. All right, let me see. Uh what about four? Is it four?

SPEAKER_03 43:53

All my all members must preserve the holy and divine laws, and all members must obey the law. Of the government because being a Moorish American. There we go. There you go. Act four. There you go. Act four. Correct. Okay. So Act Four, all members must preserve the holy and divine laws, and all members must obey the laws of the government because by being a Moorish American, you are part and parcel of the government and must live the life accordingly. So you see what you're saying is these teachings come that they conjecture. The conjecture. Okay, so what I'm trying to figure out is where did who pulled this from this?

SPEAKER_02 44:42

No, no, what started you started teaching. I'm just saying where others since then, like what how all right, how did the conjecture come? That's where the like the one who taught me, the one who taught me, yeah, the one who taught me, all right, the one through New York and others, where did they conjecture that from? Where did they, you know, like it has to be something that they read, and I'm pointing, we you read it, you just read it. What did they read? You would ask me, Abdullah, the one who taught you, Abdullah, and others. What did they read where they conjecture? Where they conjecture, remember, that's not evidence now, so that that's not evidence. It's so they're conjecturing, they're conjecturing from some point, a reference. You read it. You read it. What I'm saying is the conjecture's not out of thin air. You read the conject, you read where they conjecture from. Like they didn't look in the sky and conjecture. You just read the where they conjecture from.

SPEAKER_03 46:03

Right. So so conjecture, if you can give me the definition of what conjecture is.

SPEAKER_02 46:08

All right.

SPEAKER_03 46:09

Yeah.

SPEAKER_02 46:10

When you have you have another what's called supposition, hypothetical. So that's part, let's just let's put let's put let's put it where they hypothesize or they suppose the supposition or they conjecture. It's not where they they read what you just read, what you just read, that we're part and parcel of this said government, and they they from there they leap, leap to a conclusion. That's called leaping, that's called leaping to a conclusion without any evidence. Yeah, they jump, like they call jump to conclusion, they leap to conclusion without any evidence, right? And then they oh yeah, we the people of the United States do a thing, so they're conjecturing, oh yeah, so because we we are rate that we're part and parcel, oh yeah, and then they look at the back of the one note, all right. So it's all conjecture, it's no that's not based in evidence, yeah.

SPEAKER_00 47:24

And when you Google the word conjecture, it says a conjecture is an educated guess, opinion, or conclusion formed on the basis of incomplete or uncertain evidence. Right.

SPEAKER_02 47:37

Well, I don't see any evidence, yeah. Certain certain evidence.

SPEAKER_03 47:44

That'd be one thing. The question is the question is where okay, they got this conjecture from I don't know where Juali got it from. I can't no no no. What I'm saying is they got they got I I I see where they got it from. Now, the motive behind this conjecture is what is that that's that's the only thing that that I can.

SPEAKER_02 48:06

All right, so all right, the all right, let me so all right, the motive based on my 20s 27 years in that in that frame of mind, and telling talking to a lot of people, even dealing with conscious morse before me, all right, and talking to them, the motivation is that you know, we want to feel that like that we have some power with this constant United States Constitution that is ours. Like we want to take the motivation is to claim ownership of the United States Constitution. The motivation is that we are the superior party, all right, to the United States Constitution. The motivation is that we are the power, you know, so of the United States Constitution, the drafters, the founders, and all right. So that's the that's the drive, the motivation. You know, we we got this, you know, we got a one-up on the Europeans. You know, we got this one up on the Europeans, and that that, you know, we gave this constitution to the Europeans and to to to settle on our land, all right. That's the motivation. I'm not remembering this is 27 years now. This is 27 years. People came before me. I've been in the many discussions I had offer with this.

SPEAKER_03 49:26

Yep. This is this one, this one was a good one right here, brother. I I I gotta that's why I say I gotta talk about experience.

SPEAKER_01 49:36

Yep.

SPEAKER_03 49:40

All right, so uh we can move on to the next slide.

SPEAKER_00 49:49

Okay, so this is Cardozo, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, uh, volume 14, issues three to four, article nine. The title is Constitution Making by Treaty and German Unification, a comment on Arado, Elster, Prius, and Richards by Peter E. Quint, University of Maryland Law School. I will respond to these extra not extraordinarily rich and vote evocative articles by seeking to employ certain principles that they suggest to analyze a form of constitution, making that they do not specifically consider constitution making by treaty as exemplified in the recent unification of West and East Germany, the Federal Republic of Germany, and the German Democratic Republic. In this process, I assume a proposition that I think few will deny, the coalescent coalescence of two separate and previously hostile political bodies of such size, 60 million and 16 million inhabitants, respectively, is a fundamental constitutional act and involves a constitutional settlement, regardless of the extent to which applicable constitutional documents are altered or not altered in the process. In the case of German unification, one national constitution, the constitution of the German Democratic Republic, GDR, went out of effect, and the two German states adopted three separate treaties: the State Treaty, the Unification Treaty, and the 2 plus 4 Treaty. The latter, together with the victorious allies of World War II, which must also be considered part of the constitutional settlement. These treaties not only set forth fundamental political guidelines for unification, and for the period following unification, the state treaty and the unification treaty also affected certain actual constitutional amendments in West and in East and West, and the treaties were adopted by the two-thirds majorities necessary to enact these amendments. One, constitution making without a constituent assembly. In his article, Professor John Elster analyzes certain characteristics of the constituent assemblies in America in 1787 and in France in 1789. One of the most notable features of the German constitutional settlement of 1990 is that it was achieved without the convocation of a constituent assembly, or indeed anything that resembled a constituent assembly at all. There was no self-conscious recurrence to the singular and unitary constituent power, carefully analyzed by Professor Ulrich Prius, and there was no recourse to a unique body representing the people, which, in Elster's words, would have been suspended between the past and future, unbound by earlier generations, yet binding the later ones. The failure to convene a constituent assembly was a deliberate choice. The West German basic law of constitution clearly possessed a mechanic a mechanism for unification that could have involved calling a convention drawn from the populations of West and East Germany, a body that in some ways might have been analogous to the American Constitutional Convention or the French Assembly, Constituent, Constituente. Article 146 of the Basic Law, discussed in this context by Professor Prius, provided that unification could have been achieved by the adoption of a new all-German constitution to replace the basic law. According to the prevailing view, this constitution could have been proposed by a national convention and then perhaps submitted to the people for ratification in a plebiscite. This method, however, was not chosen. Rather, due to eastern pressure for rapid unification of the basic law, fueled by a continuing migration of Eastern citizens to the West, as well as the clear preference of the conservative coalition governing West Germany, the prevailing political groups agreed that unification should occur under Article 23 of the basic law, through which the GDR would join or accede to the Federal Republic. This process required a two-thirds vote of the GDR Parliament, Volkskimmer, for accession to the Federal Republic. Ratification of accompanying treaties also required a two-thirds vote of that chamber, as well as a two-thirds vote of the Bundestag and the Bundes Bundesrat, the two houses of the West German Parliament.

SPEAKER_01 54:52

We got five minutes left.

SPEAKER_02 55:00

This is good. This is good. What was the question? What did you ask me? Plebisite, what you were talking to me about earlier. Yes. All right. Yeah,

Referendum Versus Plebiscite Explained

SPEAKER_02 55:07

I'm going to explain the difference real quickly on the different between a referendum and a plebiscite. All right. That means what that means is the repository or storehouse of the collective sovereignty of the people is vested in a national constitution and exercised through the qualified elected representatives, whereby the people are the sovereign and their sovereignty is exercised through their qualified is embodied in a national constitution and exercised through their qualified elected representatives. So that populist sovereignty is played out in a plebiscite, which means a ref a referendum explain different. A referendum past the process. A plebiscite comes from the people, not from Congress. A plebiscite, the people through a national petition, can bring forth a bill to be voted for in a national convention outside of Congress. That's a plebiscite. The processes are different. So plebiscite embodies the principle of popular sovereignty. You also have jury notification. You have it is said that the judge deals with law, jury deals with area of law, and the jury deals with area of fact. Not in all cases. Not in the case of jury notification. In the case of jury notification, the jury deals with area of law. That is embodied in the principle of popular sovereignty. It's called jury notification.

SPEAKER_03 58:12

On

Part Two Plans And Where To Find Them

SPEAKER_03 58:13

that note, brothers, thank you guys for coming out this evening. I really appreciate this. Um, I think we should do this again. The same, can we stick on this topic for the next one?

SPEAKER_02 58:24

Uh, yes, yeah, we do absolutely part two.

SPEAKER_03 58:27

Yes, yes, sir, yes, sir.

SPEAKER_02 58:28

Part two. We'll be up, we'll be ready.

SPEAKER_03 58:30

Thank you for everybody that came out this evening watching and participating. I really appreciate everyone here. Uh, we're back on track with the schedule. Um, I've been saying it, just just so many people want to be on the podcast. We're just trying to, you know, and it's we're understaffed. There's only two people running the state. Well, it's only two of us doing this, man.

SPEAKER_02 58:51

So I know, I know. Y'all doing a great job. You and Michael doing a great job. Mikey D, where is he?

SPEAKER_03 58:59

He only he does on uh Thursdays and another day, Monday.

SPEAKER_02 59:02

Oh, done Monday and Thursday. All right, I got you.

SPEAKER_03 59:05

So uh yeah, and also for those who are Instagram, this show will go live. This show is going live on use YouTube, Instagram, Rumble, and Facebook. So oh wow, you gotta you got the hookup, bro. You're doing the thing, yeah. Yeah, yeah. Yeah, yeah. We're on Rumble too.

SPEAKER_02 59:25

Yeah, all right. You gotta give me those other links. We gotta give me the Rumble link, and um, I can go I can look up you up on um I can look you up on Rumble like that, right? The New York perspective, yes, sir. By name, all right. I'll find it.

SPEAKER_03 59:38

I'll find it nyp talk show.

SPEAKER_02 59:40

MYP talk, NYPTP talk show, myp talk show.

SPEAKER_03 59:43

Yes, yes, yes. So you brothers uh give give your uh social media's books or what have you that's that's coming out or that's out already for people to find out.

SPEAKER_02 59:52

My website is Morrismace.org. I already have books out on my website, Morrisonmace.org. Is right now working on several books again. Israel also has books. What give me your books, right?

SPEAKER_00 1:00:07

A reconstruction of words and historical sound changes. So I'm getting that together. This is a little preview. Uh also letters with power. I'm working on something for the for the children and the youth as well. You know, I got a couple other books I'm working on as well. Uh that's what I want to hear. I love it.

SPEAKER_01 1:00:26

Yeah, I got playing.

SPEAKER_00 1:00:27

Inspire others.

SPEAKER_02 1:00:27

There we go. Yeah, indeed. See what he's doing, y'all. See what he's doing.

SPEAKER_03 1:00:32

Now you see at the bottom is more's and masonry.org.

SPEAKER_02 1:00:36

It's my website. You want to get my books, Moores and Masonry Part One, Moores Mason Part Two, How Miss Masonic Copper Square, the connection to mentionment, kind keeping etymology vocabulary, etymology vocabulary, many something you want, and the illumination, illumination, and how are Venus and Moon Google. Go to Mooresandmastery.org. Father, thank you again. I'm looking forward to doing part two. And uh what the second Wednesday of next month.

SPEAKER_03 1:00:59

Second Wednesday of next month of August.

SPEAKER_02 1:01:02

Yep.

SPEAKER_03 1:01:02

Indeed. Again, thank you guys for coming out this evening. I really appreciate everyone tuning in also on Spotify, Apple Music, Apple's podcast everywhere. And uh see you guys uh, I think tomorrow. Tomorrow, Mikey Fever's on with the Nation of Islam, Kevin Ali, to talk about uh the mother plane and things like that. And then we're back on Sunday. Oh man, we got we got episodes all this week, man. All right, that's great.

SPEAKER_02 1:01:34

Peace, peace, y'all spending big time, man. Love it, man. All right, right on. Y'all do all the things.

SPEAKER_03 1:01:40

Indeed. Peace. Peace. Peace, everybody.