
sMater
sMater is a learning community 'by clinicians for clinicians', brought to you by Mater, one of Australia's leading healthcare providers.
sMater
sMater - RSV, long COVID and influenza | Prof Paul Griffin
This week on sMater, Mater Director of Infectious Diseases Prof Paul Griffin joins us to talk about RSV, COVID and influenza.
He shares invaluable insights on vaccination rates, evolving virus strains and what the future holds.
GP Education activity log:
- Podcast title - sMater: RSV, long COVID and influenza
- Provider - Mater Misericordiae Ltd
- Date published – 30 May 2025
Certificate of completion: http://www.mater.org.au/files/group/documents/smater-certificate-of-participation-rsv-long-covid.pdf
#healtheducation #healthcare #covid #RSV #influenza #vaccination #smater #mater
To learn more about Mater, visit https://www.mater.org.au/
To learn more about Mater, visit https://www.mater.org.au/
Hello and welcome to this episode of SMater, a podcast by clinicians for clinicians,
brought to you by Mater, an Australian leader in health care for more than a
century. My name is Jillian Whiting and I'm your host, coming to you from Meanjin,
the land on which this podcast is being recorded. And I'm Dr Maria Boulton, GP
specialist and former president of AMA Queensland. Today we're joined by Professor
Paul Griffin, Mater's director of infectious diseases. Paul is a leading infectious
diseases physician and clinical microbiologist who became a trusted authority on
vaccine education and advocacy during the COVID -19 pandemic. We are Mater.
We are Mater. We are Mater. This is SMater.
Paul welcome to SMater. Thanks very much for having me. We're keen to tackle quite
a few topics today including long COVID and the flu but can we start with RSV and
what we're seeing so far this year? Look it's interesting we're seeing quite a lot
from a number of respiratory viruses but RSV in particular we are seeing quite a
lot of cases already and unfortunately quite a few hospitalisations but of course the
biggest thing that's changed with RSV is we now have a lot we can do about it so
that's really the message we're trying to get out there right now. Why is its
prevention so complicated? Look for a few reasons it was a real challenge to make
an RSV vaccine so we discovered RSV in the 50s and it's not like we only just
thought up making a vaccine in the last few years. The first vaccines very crude
caused some problems so that set RSV vaccination back a long way and we needed
quite sophisticated sort of molecular biology techniques to make the kind of really
clever, highly effective vaccine that we now have. But all those things have happened
and we now have a number of different interventions, but at the moment the uptake's
been a little bit slow, so we want to get the message out there. In February we
welcomed the inclusion of the RSV vaccine at Brisbane, the NIP for pregnant women.
It's early days, but are we seeing the desired immunological response in newborns and
what are the long -term benefits of the vaccine? You're too early to see a direct
impact of the the rollout that started. I mean, we were so happy that that
announcement came. We've had these vaccines for a little while, but until that
announcement in February, none of them were funded. So that was a big barrier to
their uptake. So very welcome announcement. We're seeing some reasonable uptake but
not where we want it to be. And in terms of actually translating that into
outcomes, It's a bit early, but we certainly anticipate that will be the case. In
addition to this, we've had the monoclonal antibody treatment, Nosevimab, that's also
been made available for babies and infants at risk of RSV, and Marder, as well as
the other hospitals have been offering to newborns since last April. What do we know
about the impact this is having on RSV cases and admissions to hospital? We know
it's had a huge impact. So us and others are measuring what we've seen and there
was some information put out by the government early on in the season last year
that there'd still been 90 babies admitted to hospital with RSV, but not one had
received a seven MAB. And so that was a reduction of nearly 50 % on what was
expected compared to previous years. So truly having an amazing impact, we've had a
bit of a look at some of the information around the uptake and it's not been as
high as we'd like with that either. And now one of the big challenges is it's a
really complicated system with a sort of national NIP funded vaccine and a state
based funded antibody and who gets what. So, you know, I think we need to do a
lot more to educate everybody about these preventative measures and where they all
fit in. But yeah, when we look at the impact of Necevimab, it's been huge. And so
it's really great that now most states have access to that. Are there any
limitations on stock? My understanding is that there were some challenges early on,
but at the moment, not really. So I think the biggest challenge is knowing who's
giving it and when. We looked at some of the data and some people missed out early
on and then we weren't sure if they got it later on. Are we any closer to having
a vaccine that is approved for babies and infants? Yeah, look, that's a bit of a
tricky one. So, you know, given we have maternal vaccination, now we seven ab and
that's so safe and effective. I think the momentum for developing vaccines for
younger babies is probably slowed down a little bit. So there's nothing imminent as
far as I'm aware. I mean maternal vaccination is such a good strategy because you
kind of get a three or four for one. You protect mum, you protect the baby
directly, it's a bit of cocooning so baby won't get it from mum and then even
maybe some transfer of immunity through breastfeeding. So it's such an effective
strategy that then trying to additionally vaccinate the babies, there's probably a
little bit less momentum to have to do that in addition. Let's talk about trials
and Mater's also part of a first in human trial using an experimental mRNA vaccine
designed to prevent RSV in participants aged 60 to 75.
What can you tell us? How's the trial progressing? In terms of some of our vaccine
work, you know, it's always hard to comment too much until the trial is completed
and the data is analysed and that can take up to 12 months after, so make sure we
rigorously put all that together. But our vaccine studies, including that one, are
going really well. We've got a community that's supportive, so we recruit lots of
eager people into our studies and obviously carefully monitor them. So a bit too
early to report on results, but it's looking promising. Older Australians are at risk
of severe disease when it comes to RSV. There is a vaccine available but the cost
is really prohibitive. Is there any moves to fund it? The biggest change with one
of the RSV vaccines is that they were initially both approved for over 60s and
about two and a half weeks ago, one of those was expanded to be available for
people 50 to 59 with risk factors. But in Australia we've got this complex system,
they get approved by the TGA so they're available, they get kind of recommended by
another group, and that adds a layer of complexity. And then the funding piece is
very separate. And there's always a lag. So they never happen one straight after the
other. So to get something funded, there has to be a really detailed, robust
evaluation of cost -effectiveness. And even though we know the vaccine's safe and
effective, it's not always determined that it's cost -effective in that group. So
we're still waiting on that. There's lots of people lobbying really hard to get it
funded because we know that especially at the moment with costs of living etc that
you know the cost of that vaccine is a real challenge but in some of the
discussions we've had around that it's been really interesting some of the anecdotes
so one of the best tips I think I had from a GP was don't you know tell people
not to assume people can't afford it because if they've seen a young baby with RSV
or they've had up themselves or a family member sometimes people who probably can't
afford it will still want to pay for that vaccine so I think still recommending it,
making sure people know that it's out there and how it fits in and how significant
RSV can be is still really important. And Queensland does seem to be ahead of the
game when it comes to funding vaccines, right? Like we fund the flu vaccine for
everyone? Yeah, look it's been incredible and you know shout out to everyone involved
and to the government for doing that and you know we have big meetings where we're
talking about funding of these vaccines in other states and you know they're really
jealous of our situation here at the moment. The flu vaccine as you say funding
that for everyone is amazing. Manager Cockle is another great vaccine funding story
here and of course we were the second state to roll out the antibodies for RSV. So
we're very lucky here in Queensland and I just hope that it continues and we have
certainty about those things moving forward. - On vaccines, what are the current
challenges in developing a universal RSV vaccine? - It's great, we've got three
options. So two options approved in Australia, there is another option approved in
the US that might come here in time. It's like a lot of vaccines, we're really
lucky to have those but there's a big shopping list of additional properties that we
would like potentially so a lot of work still continuing. I think at the moment
what we've got is probably what we're going to have for some time. There's probably
not a lot of movement there other than maybe combination vaccines that I'm sure
we'll get to in a moment. I think just to be aware that the vaccine options we
have now are safe and effective. Biggest barrier, of course, is cost, but we're
really lucky that they're working really well.
RSV became a reportable virus to the National Notifiable Disease Surveillance System
in July 2021, more than a year after COVID -19 was listed on the same register.
RSV's addition to the list was driven by a combination of enhanced surveillance
capacity, greater recognition of its health burden and the emergence of new
preventative strategies, all of which gained momentum in the wake of COVID -19.
I don't need to tell you this but COVID arrived five years ago, I don't know
whether it feels like yesterday or a lifetime ago, what about you? Look in some
ways it feels like we've been doing it forever and in some ways it feels like
we're just getting started and you know the discussion around COVID is fascinating, I
mean it's really clear, so many people describe it as post -pandemic or post -COVID
but it's not going to go away and it's going to keep being a problem forever and
I think that's really the mindset change that we have to bring in now is that we
want people just to incorporate this into what they do sensibly and practically to
keep themselves and everyone safe every year just like we've been encouraging people
to do for the flu and now we're doing for RSV as well. So much has changed really
in that five years and including the variants presenting. So what's the next variant
that we're keeping an eye on? How does it present differently to those that we're
seeing at the moment? It's funny, I think for most people they don't need to know
what variant we're talking about. We can encourage people to leave that for a small
number of people who are responsible for coming up with recommendations because this
virus is going to keep changing. There's thousands of Omicron sub variants. Now The
latest one, LP 8 .1 is dominant globally, not yet dominant in Australia, but will
be. And the same discussion we've had probably 50 times now, we don't know whether
that's gonna mean we get a rise in cases from that sub variant or one in the
future. But what we do know, inevitably COVID will increase again. We're probably at
the lowest numbers of COVID right now that we've seen, which is great, but that's
not zero. And that's not gonna stay that way forever. So COVID will keep coming and
we've got great interventions but they're just being so dramatically underutilised.
What are the latest insights into how long COVID presents and presents differently
across different demographics? Yeah that's a really challenging one and you know I
think in the end we'll discover there's lots of different types of long COVID and
basically it's different for individuals. You know if you look at sources in the
literature they'll say there's 200 or 250 symptoms of long COVID, but basically it's
anything. I think that the commonest ones are sort of general things like fatigue
and lethargy, and it's people that just can't do what they used to do. They're
fatigued. Like running a marathon would have been before. Daily activities, fatigue
them and leave them washed out. And then there's a lot of different organ systems
involved. I think probably the next common ones, and it depends on which source you
use, respiratory, want us a breath even on doing things that wouldn't have been
considered activity before talking or walking, cardiovascular, chest pain, fast heart
rate is really common, neurological things and I think everyone's familiar with brain
fog but you know that means different things to different people and then from there
it's anything. Some people can have musculoskeletal things, other neurological things
and even gastrointestinal things so changes in bowels is something as well. Has there
been a shift in how long COVID presents? Because it seems that at the beginning, at
the start of the pandemic, we're getting a lot of people with chest pain and
shortness of breath, whereas now we get more the fatigue and the gut issues. Yeah,
I think so. Part of it's also a recognition thing as well, and the types of people
we're seeing. And, you know, obviously, and, you know, certainly not suggesting COVID
is not a problem, as we've already said, but the risk from COVID has declined. The
number of people in hospital and dying is less, which is fantastic. So how we're
talking about and thinking about COVID is a little bit different. So I think part
of that is, you know, maybe we're not finding a lot of them these days as well.
And for so many, it's hard for them, you know, we don't have the long COVID
clinics like we did. It's not talked about as much. So there's probably an under
recognition which might be skewing some of those presentations. So yeah, it's
complicated. - What are the current evidence -based guidelines for treating long COVID?
Because we know that I mean these patients they'll try anything but where is the
evidence? Yeah look at a tricky one and you know it's great there's a lot of
research happening in long COVID I'm part of the group assessing a whole lot of
grants that are coming through for for all sorts of different things with long
COVID. I mean what we really need we need to understand the mechanism better we
need to be able to diagnose it better and of course what we want that to translate
into is better management and at the moment we're really wanting in all of those
areas. So, you know, I think in terms of what's causing it, there's probably a
whole host of different things. And maybe, you know, a lot of it is an
immunological thing, maybe a bit of an exaggerated immune response. And part of it
is probably also a direct viral thing. So we're still working on it there. But in
terms of approved therapies, basically we don't have any. There's emerging evidence
that if people get met foreman early on in their COVID, it probably reduces the
chance of getting long COVID. But again, there's some controversy around that, so not
suggesting we prescribe that. I guess the simple answer there is keep an eye out
for guidelines when they come, when we do have approved therapies. But at the
moment, no pharmacological therapies. But I think there's been a whole host of things
that can help in my experience. And I think, first of all, having an understanding
and appreciation that it's real because a lot of these patients bounce between
different people getting told there's nothing wrong with you and I think that
frustration and that need to be validated and have someone who can just listen to
them is really important. I think making sure there's not something else going on,
not just assuming that's long COVID, you know, because we don't want to miss things
like PEs or thyroid issues, diabetes for example, but then there's a whole host of
multidisciplinary people that really help, whether it's exercise, physiology,
physiotherapists, et cetera, there's a whole host of people that can help. And I
think involving as many of those as possible, ideally with a long COVID clinic, but
they're so hard to get into. But just making sure that you understand and listen to
those patients and do as much as you can to help them. Is there any evidence for
vitamins and supplements?
Obviously, if you're deficient in something, it will make a difference. So we
certainly want to make sure people aren't B12 for later on. Deficient, for example,
but if you're not deficient taking all of those things, unfortunately, doesn't have a
role necessarily. Are we getting any closer to an effective long COVID treatment?
Look, I think we will get something, but I think because long COVID is probably so
many different things, we might have treatments that work for some people and not
others. And part of that will be working out who's got what type of long COVID or
what's driving there long COVID to be able to address it more specifically. So I
think we will get some therapies. But at the moment, nothing that's approved. I
guess the one thing I will remind everybody is there's really good evidence that if
you're vaccinated, you're less likely to have long COVID. It obviously changes the
acute presentation. They're likely to getting more severe disease in the short term,
but it also has really good evidence for reducing your chance of long COVID. And,
you know, we know as So, severity indicator, for example, if you're hospitalised with
COVID and get long COVID, you're likely to have long COVID longer, so probably nine
or 10 months. If you're not, then your long COVID is likely to be shorter, so on
average maybe four or five months. So, again, the benefits of vaccination are really
clear there, too. Is there any research going into the use of monoclonal antibodies
in the treatment of long COVID? There's lots of things, and if we look at
potentially having an immunological mechanism. We've got so many great ways of
modulating the immune response with monoclonals now and there's some work specifically
looking at all types of monoclonals there. Again it's relatively early though and I
think one of the things we need to do is be able to diagnose it better, maybe
classify it into certain types and then look at more specific interventions there and
you know there's lots of great work happening in Australia as well as elsewhere into
a lot of those things. hopefully we'll have some progress soon. - You mentioned
before that COVID numbers are down currently. Does that translate to the chance of
developing long COVID? Were we seeing more people developing long COVID early on in
the pandemic than we do now? - Yeah, it's a bit complicated. So, you know, it's
fascinating. We talk about our case numbers now, but we know we're probably only
scratching the surface with the real numbers that are out there. So you know one of
the ways we look at that is the proportion of tests that are positive and we used
to freak out when I got to sort of six or seven before because that told us we
were missing a lot of cases and it's you know usually 10 to 14 at the moment so
we know we're only finding a small proportion so you know while we've had you know
60 odd thousand cases across the country this year it's probably many times that and
then the proportion that go on to long COVID is very different depending on how you
define it and what source of data you use. So, you know, most people would suggest
it's probably around six to ten percent of acute COVID goes on to long COVID. But
if we're not finding a lot of the acute COVID, it's very hard to know. So, you
know, the actual prevalence of long COVID is really hard to determine. What advice
can we give patients who have symptoms of long COVID? Well, I think the first one
is to just provide reassurance that you will get better. Most people get better from
long COVID. most people it's within a matter of months and for the vast majority
it's within a year. So be optimistic about recovery. There's some work coming out
about some other ways of approaching long COVID and it's the the three P's which is
pace, plan and prioritise which really is about not overdoing it.
So many times I get the story recounted that they feel really flat they have a
better day so they go to the gym, mow the lawns, do the shopping and then get off
the couch or out of bed for two days. So it's about pacing yourself, holding back
a little bit, planning your activities so that you can have breaks and spread things
out and prioritising. Just understanding that you have some limitations, you're not
going to be able to do everything. So pick the top things, get those done whilst
planning and pacing yourself and appreciating you can't do everything and just giving
yourself time to recover. Do you have any advice for people who want to return to
exercise, you know, particularly those people who are avid exercises like people who
do triathlons, etc. Yeah, the way I'll describe it to them is for a lot of those
people doing a normal thing that you used to do, a day -to -day activity, will be
like doing whatever event it was you used to do and just think about it that way.
So in essence, almost train to get back to having a full day, whether that's work
or just doing normal things, don't overdo it early 'cause that'll set you back just
like it would have when you started training for your marathon or your rowing event,
et cetera. So think of your daily activities almost as an event to train for and
have a long -term plan in terms of getting back to what level of function you had
before. - The thing that concerns me, Paul, is that it seems that people aren't
aware that there are antiviral treatments for COVID and particularly those people who
are high at risk. But it seems that people aren't Yeah, absolutely. And you know,
that that's a great question and a really important point. So first of all, testing
has become much harder to access. So early on, you know, I think it was great. It
was one of the big strengths of Australia's response was that we just let people
get tested without needing to see a GP first and waiting for the referral and then
paying extra for that, the drive -through clinics. They were great innovations that
made a huge difference. And of course, we've undone all of that now. So many people
recount to me that it's just really hard. You've got a CGP get a referral that
there's a bit of a delay and then there's a delay getting that test and you know
The single biggest determinant of how effective antivirals are is how quickly they're
initiated. So on that point I encourage high risk people to have a plan for how
they get tested and get access to the antivirals Head of their infection if they're
in that risk category that they might benefit from that because that way they can
do that quickly And it's going to make a huge difference. And the other thing about
testing is with, you know, laboratory based PCR, those no swabs we all can to know
and love that major eyes water, we can find all sorts of things at once. And we
have excellent antivirals for COVID, excellent antivirals for the flu again, if
they're started early in high risk people. And then we have antibiotics for some of
the bacterial things that can look similar, microplasma and whooping cough. All of
those things are indistinguishable early on. So you don't know what someone's got,
but we can do something about those. And then kind of a secondary gains. We also
know what's out there. We can do excellent surveillance. That's how we know what
subverance of COVID is circulating. That's how we know what type of flu is around.
So there's heaps of benefits to testing. And I think people have lost sight of a
lot of that as well. And just also on the rapid -angent test, just so people know,
there's actually combination rapid -angent tests as well, so they'll do COVID flu and
RSV so they're really helpful and especially if there's delays or people can't access
a laboratory the challenge with those is the sensitivity and when we've looked at
some of those for flu B for example sensitivity of those combo ones you do at home
it's probably 30 or 40 percent so the big message there is they're great do them
and if they're positive get your antivirus isolated etc but if they're negative don't
assume you find to go and visit your sick relative in a nursing home or go to a
hospital because you could still have COVID flu or RSV. - Yes, and I do have some
of those in my drawer. What we do at our clinic, and what some GPs do, is that
basically, if somebody's at risk of severe disease with COVID, we put it in the
comments section in the file. So if they ring up with respiratory symptoms, we know
that they need to be fitted in, we know that they need to be tested, and we know
that they need to be considered for the antiviral treatment as well. - Yeah, that's
great. And I think the other message there as well. And one of the things that's
probably contributing to the high numbers of all these things we're seeing is either
way, if people have symptoms, we want them to stay home. And that was a message
that was really effective during COVID. And people probably remember if you went on
a bus or in a public place and coughed or sneezed, everyone would look at you. And
so people were doing the right thing for a variety of reasons. But we used to say
this every year for the flu. And people think they're doing the right thing
soldiering on. But there's great evidence that doing that and spreading your COVID
flu or RSV in the workplace has a massive impact on productivity, so it's better if
you do the right thing, stay home till you're not shitting and potentially spreading
those things around and then go back to work.
The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare reports that from the limited data
available, current prevalence estimates of long COVID, defined as 12 weeks or greater,
in Australia range from 5 % to 10 % of COVID -19 cases.
- Focusing on the flu now, our vaccination rates have been described as dire. Our
flu case numbers are tracking above the average for the past five years. So what
does that mean for the flu season ahead and what should GPs be preparing for? - The
simple answer there in terms of what it means is worse than it should otherwise be.
So first of all, on the numbers. So we've seen about one and a half to two times
the number of cases we would see for January, February, March and April. So a
really big inter -seasonal period with flu. Now, a lot of people say, what does that
mean for the season? Simple answer is we don't know what the season is going to
bring until after and we can reflect and look back. But it is a bit concerning,
especially when you then factor in our vaccination rates. And, you know, we've
touched on how great our job Queensland has done in terms of funding flu vaccines
for everybody, unfortunately, that hasn't translated into an increase, which is what
we'd really like to see. And, you know, if we look at our highest risk groups, so
people over 65 and young children, we're tracking along on about a third of those
people being vaccinated, which is really concerning. And, you know, as I mentioned,
that means that whatever the flu season brings, the impact will be greater than it
should have been. we know flu vaccines aren't perfect, we know you can still get
the flu after you've had a flu vaccine but what we do know is that flu will be
different in terms of your trajectory. You'll be sicker probably for a shorter
period, you're less likely to go to hospital, less likely to die from the flu and
probably less likely to spread it as well. So if people want to know what the
benefits of those vaccines are it's really clear and the fact that people can still
get the flu is not a failure of those vaccines And I think people need to
understand that there's so much misinformation about flu vaccines and vaccines in
general that I think that's part of what's impacting those rates. I am concerned
that it's quite an early season, but also it seems that those patients who are
becoming sick with the flu who are unvaccinated are actually reporting really severe
symptoms and it's spreading quite easily amongst the family members, which is not
good. I was just wondering, when it comes to vaccines, is there any research on
what is best when combating misinformation about vaccines? We haven't solved this,
otherwise we'd have better vaccine rates. I think, you know, part of it is
understanding what people's concerns are. And you know, I think there's a, there are
those people that are what would have previously been labelled as true anti -vaxxism.
We probably can't change their opinion and that's fine because I think they're the,
they're actually the minority. But I think there's a lot of people that are a
little bit confused because it's really complicated. You know, we've got more vaccines
for the elderly now. I often say that for older adults, it's a bit like being in
the pediatrics space 'cause there's now a whole host of quite complicated vaccines
that we recommend for that group. Pediatrics, we know, has always been complicated.
And in pregnancy, there's now three vaccines we recommend for every pregnant woman.
So it's just more complicated. So for many people it's overwhelming I think that's
part of it. I think the amount of information that's out there is hard for a lot
of people to digest and I think for a lot of people they're probably sick of
talking about infections as well that and it gets called fatigue although some people
said we don't want to describe it as fatigue but it's just been too much maybe so
you know I think that's a role that a lot of people involved in this space can
really have in just reminding people telling them how important these things are and
you know our GPs do a great job of doing that every day, but we know that they're
busy and time poor, so it's hard to just rely on them. Pharmacists have a bigger
role these days, but I think everybody just needs to know how important these
vaccines are and do a better job of reminding people and encouraging them to get
them every year. - Well, we heard earlier this season about the risk of the
quodemic, RSV, COVID, influenza and Norovirus all striking at once,
is it still a risk and what are the implications of these co -infections? That's the
thing that makes every winter more challenging now is we used to have, you know, we
used to struggle with the flu season every year and we had a bit of a bad flu
season. That by itself was enough to make our hospitals more stretched than they are
at baseline, make it really hard for our GPs. We know that, you know, there's
millions of primary care presentations from the flu alone potentially every year. Then
we add RSV to that and now we've added COVID to that and every year COVID is
going to be something we consider in addition to the flu and RSV. But we're seeing
lots of other things. Norovirus is one. In the last couple of years we've seen a
lot of microplasma and whooping cough or pertussis as well. And now we've got
measles and all sorts of other things as well. So it's a really crowded space and
so that means in a resource constrained environment where we want people to come and
get advice about vaccines and get access to get tested etc it's really hard and so
you know we are in for a tricky winter I think. Speaking of combos is there any
progress being made on a combo vaccine you know COVID flu maybe COVID flu RSV.
I'd like to think there are some upsides from what we went through with COVID and
I think it has advanced a lot of vaccine development and so now there are heaps of
combination vaccines. And here at the Mata, we're trialing a few of those. So COVID
flu, COVID flu, RSV, and even some with human metonymivirus in it, where we haven't
had an approved vaccine. And that's probably the virus severity wise. It's just below
those other three. So it'd be great to have a vaccine for that. So yeah, there
will be combination vaccines. Like all these vaccines, we can't recommend them or say
they'll be available until we've got the data to approved that and they're approved
by our regulators so that's not the case yet whether it's this year or next year
or the year after it's hard to say but I think that'll make a big difference the
biggest thing of course and we'll be talking about that a lot at the time is it's
gonna be really hard to know when to recommend those because the seasonality of all
those things doesn't overlap exactly so yeah we're gonna have some interesting
conversations but yeah the combination vaccines will come. So much work being done in
this area. What about a universal flu vaccine? You know lots of really good work
being done and I think we're getting much more advanced in some of our techniques
with vaccines that you know that might be something we're getting closer to but
that's been tried for a long time. It's a really really difficult thing to do so I
don't know if we'll ever get a true universal vaccine. I think you know the next
big steps forward with flu is we're going to have combinations. We're probably going
to have very soon vaccines that don't need to be given by a needle and syringe so
patches things you can put on the skin which will be a big step forward and then
maybe an intranasal vaccine so we've kind of got one of those but that's going to
improve so again we can spray it rather than having to inject it so lots of great
work happening you know locally and here at the martyr even on a lot of these
things but you know for now the main focus I think has to be on recommending the
vaccines we have because they're already excellent but just underutilised. And that's
something that you've been doing very publicly for the past few years. We've been
talking about your public role and talking about all of this just from a personal
perspective. You do a lot of talking about it. How are you feeling about it and
how much work do you actually do sharing this message with the broader population?
Yeah, thanks. Look, there's so many important messages that I think aren't easy to
find for people and this is feedback that I get often is that you know there's a
lot of noise so I you know I guess my approach and whether I do this or not I
guess it's up for other people to to decide but I just try and get the what I
think are the important messages out there in a way that hopefully most people can
can understand and you know as I mentioned we've got great vaccines they are safe
and effective or we just can't use them in this country and the utilization of
these interventions has a direct impact on what we see, whether it's COVID flu,
measles, etc. And so we do have to try and combat a lot of the misinformation and
lack of information by trying to get good things out there. And I try and help in
a really small way in that regard. Well, thank you for all the work that you do.
And thank you so much for joining us on SMater Today. Before we go, though, we
have a little segment called The Checkup. So, surprise, we have five quick questions
to ask you and Maria will ask you and they're just questions about you to give us
an insight into the man you are, so are you ready to go? Let's go. Quick five.
Great. Alrighty. What was your first concert? Oh, probably Pearl Jam.
If you could impart one piece of knowledge on a medical medical student what would
it be. I think just to let them know it is a hard road ahead but it's a really
enjoyable one and if you put the work in it's an amazing career. Who was the last
person you FaceTimed? FaceTime? Oh I'm Android so I don't have FaceTime.
You Android. I guess Skype which now doesn't work but my parents my parents live
interstate so I virtual call them all the time. And what TV show best portrays your
profession? Look, it probably reflects a bit of my nerdy approach,
but I like Scrubs. That's a great show. What's your secret superpower? Oh,
gosh, secret superpower? I don't know. That's a hard one.
Never thought about it like that. Might Just like a rain check on that question,
I'm not sure. Yeah, to be discovered. To be discovered, yeah, exactly, exactly. Paul,
thanks again so much for joining us on SMater. It's a pleasure, thanks for having
me, guys. For our listeners at home or in the car or having a well -deserved break
between patients, thanks for tuning in. See you next time on SMater.