At What Point Must We Speak Out? Examining Washington's Legal System

Washington State Supreme Court committing right rape, King County Prosecutor: Prosecutor Mark Larson, Prosecutor Lisa Johnson, Prosecutor Nicole Weston, Prosecutor Rich Anderson and Prosecutor Jason Simmons. Judge Beth M. Andrus, Judge Lori K. Smith, Prosecutor Leesa Manion, King County Prosecutor's Office, City of Enumclaw, Prosecutor David Seaver who continues to misrepresent the truth, i.e. lie.

www.consider.info

Chapters

• 0:00 Introduction to Legal Brief
• 0:31 Systemic Corruption Claims
• 1:38 Malcolm Fraser Case Evidence
• 3:36 Key Evidence and Resources

Transcript

Speaker 1: 0:06

Sample Legal Brief Motion to Dismiss Charges Systematic Corruption. The following sample legal brief does not constitute legal advice. Rather, it is a recommendation from a layperson suggesting that defense attorneys should move to dismiss all charges at the beginning of each trial citing systemic corruption within the Washington state legal system. This brief aims to present a continuous account of the wrongs, corruptions and absurdities attributed to Washington state. The Washington State Bar Association has eliminated the requirement for bar exams, indicating a shift from upholding constitutional law to fostering oppression against those who do not conform to a specific political agenda. This raises the critical question at what point must an individual in the legal profession unequivocally denounce the corruption? To rephrase the query, as Germany descended into the era of Nazi rule, enacting one oppressive law after another, at what juncture should a judge, police officer or prosecutor have felt compelled to resist, renounce and expose the legal corruption in seattle and king county? That line has been crossed. It's imperative for prosecutor associations, law enforcement and judges to begin shedding light on these corrupt practices. The case of state versus malcolm fraser cause number 12-1-01886-0 exemplifies a profound instance of corruption that can be built upon for renewed objections in the courts of Washington state.

Speaker 1: 1:55

Seven irrefutable facts of the state of Washington versus Malcolm Fraser One. The Washington government hotly refused to investigate clear evidence of a hate crime. 2. From the outset, seattle-king County courts have shielded Enumclaw detective Grant McCall's illegal activities. 3. Despite the abundance of evidence disproving the allegations of sex crimes, an investigation was never pursued. Calls for such an inquiry were systematically blocked.

Speaker 1: 2:27

4. Seattle King County prosecutors misused the law, leveraging Detective Grant McCall and his co-conspirators' hate crime activities to dismantle a church that stood in opposition to Washington state beliefs. This situation reflects Washington state's anti-Christian sentiment, contributing to a severe miscarriage of justice through prosecution. 5. Judge Beth M Andrus, from the very beginning, while ruling that Detective Grant McCall had committed misconduct, made sure to whitewash McCall's illegal activities. Judge Beth M Andrus' whitewash ruling, without any evidence and zero investigation into the hate crime, allowed the legal system to fully corrupt the oppression by future prosecutors and judges. Six Judge Lori K Smith severely corrupted the trial by undermining the defense's rights and obstructing their ability to mount a vigorous defense. In short, like Detective Grant McCall, frame judges in Washington state ensured the trial would result in a conviction for prosecutors.

Speaker 1: 3:37

7. The whole of this trial focused on crushing the rights of a church that Detective Grant McCall and co-conspirators sought to destroy. The sexual allegations were the pretext to permit Washington state to oppress and crush Christianity. In essence, the trial of Malcolm Fraser should never have occurred. Those implicated in the hate crime should be incarcerated, while those who lied to benefit the prosecution should face charges of perjury. To this day, the evidence supporting these claims is overwhelming and can be found at wwwenumclawcom or wwwconsiderinfo, the Consider Podcast Examining today's wisdom, folly and madness. Wwwconsiderinfo.