The Consider Podcast

Updated: Follow The Finger

The Consider Podcast Hosts Timothy & Jacob

Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.

0:00 | 6:31

Send a text

Police and Prosecutors are producing false allegations and impossible crimes.
Seattle, King County Prosecutors, City of Enumclaw, Washington State

www.consider.info

SPEAKER_00:

Quote. Every allegation comes from the detective. Dr. John Ewell, forensic psychologist. End quote. More information with the transcript statements can be found at www.consider.click slash two G Z. Follow the finger. Follow the finger. Prosecutors. Police and scripted accusations. Enum Claw Detective Grant McCall and his co-conspirator had been grooming false accusations for over a year. The hostile effects of the hate crime had been going on long before this scripted accusation. In short, Enum Claw Detective Grant McCall terminated the recording, and upon resuming, the testimony of the manipulated accuser had undergone a complete transformation. The follow-the-finger testimony serves as compelling evidence of an orchestrated hate crime. In a solitary meeting, sitting alone with the manipulated accuser, City of Enum Claw detective Grant McCall engages with the manipulated accuser, introducing inappropriate suggestions involving both the vagina and anus. When the manipulated accuser hesitates, McCall abruptly stops the recording to take a break. It's important to note that McCall has previously deleted evidence and ignored the actual allegations to the point of refusing to investigate the location where the alleged abuse had taken place. Detective Grant McCall knew that if the home had been examined, the crime would have been impossible to commit. With the approval of King County prosecutors and judges, Detective McCall prompts the accuser for specific responses and pauses the recording to take a little break. When there is no immediate reply regarding the anal suggestion, McCall calls for a break, shutting off the recorder once again, keeping in mind that McCall had already deleted crucial evidence. During the break, the narrative of accusations miraculously alters. Detective Grant McCall switches off the recorder, influences the false accuser, and upon resuming, the story has transformed. The transcript reads as follows. Detective Grant McCall. And you're certain his fingers didn't penetrate your vagina? Manipulated accuser. Yes. Detective Grant McCall. What about your anus? It's alright if you want to take a little break. Manipulated accuser? Unintelligible. Just moments after the recording restarts, Detective McCall simply says, okay. No further commentary from McCall. But now, post-break, the manipulated accuser has crafted a narrative that aligns perfectly with McCall's objectives. Instantly, upon McCall's okay, the manipulated accuser begins fabricating a story about conspiring events. The manipulated accuser explicitly stated, never like penetrated me or anything. King County prosecutors in Seattle subsequently misrepresented the assertion before a jury that the manipulated accuser had always claimed penetration by a finger. City of Enum Clause Grant McCall coordinated the false accusations while his accomplice groomed the situation, creating a multi-tiered scenario surrounding a hate crime. Prosecutor Jason Simmons and his team embraced these fabricated claims and reshaped them into a harmful narrative aimed at a righteous Christian church they aimed to undermine. Judge Laurie K. Smith colluded with the prosecutors to systematically obliterate truth and violate the rights of the accused. In his closing arguments, prosecutor Jason Simmons claimed the manipulated accuser had previously disclosed abuse to social services. This disinformation tactic distorted the truth to an egregious extent. The manipulated accuser merely indicated to social services that she had been abused, lacking any specific details other than that no penetration occurred again definitively. No penetration had taken place. To elevate the allegations to a felony status, Detective McCall needed to introduce an assertion of penetration. Detective Grant McCall suggested and guided the accuser to assert that a finger had been inserted. At that instant, the manipulated accuser displayed hesitation, stumbling over her words. Detective McCall then halted the recording to claim they would take a break. Upon resuming, the fabricated narrative regarding finger insertion began to take shape. Judge Lori K. Smith and prosecutor Jason Simmons solidified this contrived falsehood during the trial as if the manipulated accuser had consistently maintained this story from the outset. In reality, the claim of a finger event originated entirely from Enum Claw detective Grant McCall. This is not a mere questionable allegation. It represents a criminal act concealed by the King County prosecutors of Seattle, Washington.

SPEAKER_02:

And every allegation comes from the detective. Well, my uh my overall uh comment was that this is uh an absolutely terrible interview.

SPEAKER_01:

Did Detective McCall ever give an opportunity for a narrative response?

SPEAKER_02:

No.

SPEAKER_01:

Does this interview adhere to the basic tenets of the Washington state guidelines?

SPEAKER_02:

No. I mean, this entire interview is not acceptable. Every single act, alleged act, is is suggested first by the officer and um every act? Yes, every act. So the act that just talks about touching the chest and touching the crotch first. He talks about uh him touching, or excuse me, the complainant touching the accused first.