Divorce Rich with Jacki Roessler, CDFA
Welcome to the Divorce Rich Podcast! Join your host, highly sought-after speaker and experienced Certified Divorce Financial Analyst, Jacki Roessler, CDFA in this engaging and down to earth show. Along with her guests, Jacki offers clear and detailed advice to improve your financial decisions before, during and after divorce so you can survive divorce rich! New episodes are posted every Thursday! You can reach Jacki through her Michigan-based firm, Roessler Divorce Consulting, located at 600 S. Adams, Suite 300, Birmingham, MI 48009 or by email at jacqueline@roesslerdivorce.com.
Divorce Rich with Jacki Roessler, CDFA
Prenups and Divorce: What a CDFA Actually Looks For
Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.
Everyone assumes a prenup is a legal document you sign once and forget about. But when a marriage ends — five years later, or twenty — someone has to go back and figure out what that agreement actually means in today's dollars, today's assets, today's reality. That's where a CDFA comes in.
In this solo episode, Jacki breaks down what's really inside a prenuptial or post-nuptial agreement from a financial (not legal) point of view — separate property schedules, appreciation clauses, income allocation, spousal support waivers — and walks through a real-world case where a business grew from $300,000 to over $2 million during the marriage, and what that meant for the settlement.
Jacki also busts a couple of myths she hears constantly from clients, explains why a CDFA's role isn't to decide if a prenup is enforceable, and makes the case for bringing a financial professional into the room before the wedding — not just after the divorce filing.
In this episode:
- What's actually inside a typical prenup or post-nup
- The difference between passive and active appreciation (and why it matters)
- Two common myths clients believe about what a prenup can and can't do
- A real case study: a business, twelve years of marriage, and a very different outcome depending on how one clause is interpreted
- Why getting a CDFA involved before the wedding protects both spouses, not just the wealthier one
Whether you're an attorney with an old prenup sitting in a client file, or you're the one about to sign one, this episode will change how you think about that document.
Visit us at https://www.roesslerdivorce.com/ to learn more about Jacki's practice and to find valuable resources for your case.
Center for Financial Planning
The Divorce Rich podcast is proudly sponsored by Center for Financial Planning: Striving to Improve Lives through Financial Planning Done Right! https://www.centerfinplan.com/
DAWN
Divorce Attorneys for Women: Michigan's Original Divorce Attorneys for Michigan
Welcome, Sponsors, And Setup
SPEAKER_01Welcome to the Divorce Rich Podcast. I'm your host, Jackie Ressler, and I've been a certified divorce financial analyst for 28 years, helping clients and their attorneys navigate the financial issues in divorce. If you're in the process of or considering divorce, now is the time for you to take a deep breath and give yourself permission to find clarity on the financial decisions that you're facing. The definition of rich is manifold. The best definition that I found is someone who has access to many resources. Along with my guest on this podcast, I am going to make sure that you have access to all the resources you need to make good decisions for yourself. Hey, if you're recently divorced or still in the middle of it, you already know life can feel like it's been turned upside down. And let's be honest, the financial part is overwhelming, confusing, and often the last thing that you want to deal with. That's why I want to tell you about the independent wealth management team at the Center for Financial Planning. Their team of certified financial planners specializes in helping people just like you navigate life changes with confidence. Whether it's assessing your new financial circumstances, creating or updating your retirement plan, or helping you adjust to the new normal, they'll work with you to get a clear, customized plan to feel in control and move forward with confidence. So if you're interested in working with the financial planner you can trust to have your best interest in mind, and you're ready to take the next step, visit centerfinplan.com. That's centerfinplan.com and schedule a conversation. Center for Financial Planning.
SPEAKER_00Live your plan. Disclosure. Securities offered through Raymond James Financial Services Inc., member FINBRA SIPC. Investment advisory services offered through Center for Financial Planning, Inc. Center for Financial Planning Inc. is not a registered broker dealer and is independent of Raymond James Financial Services. Center for Financial Planning was a sponsor of the Divorce Rich Podcast. The Center for Financial Planning and Raymond James are not affiliated with or endorsed by the Divorce Rich Podcast.
SPEAKER_01Hi
A Prenup As Financial Time Capsule
SPEAKER_01everyone, and welcome back to the Divorce Rich Podcast. This is Jackie Rustler, and I have a solo episode for you today. So a few years back, I sat across the table from a woman, I'll call her Patricia because that's not her real name. And she had said something to me I will never forget. She said, I signed that prenup 12 years ago. I was so in love, I would have signed anything. Honestly, I don't even remember what it said. 12 years, one business that went from $300,000 to over $2 million, and a piece of paper she barely remembered that was about to determine whether she walked away with a share of that growth or with nothing. That's the thing about prenups. Nobody thinks about them on the wedding day. They think about the flowers, the seating chart. Nobody is thinking, I wonder how this appreciation clause is going to read when I'm 48 and sitting in a mediation. But here's what I've learned after 30 years of doing this work. A prenup isn't just a legal document, it's a financial time capsule. And when a marriage ends, whether it ends in 10 years or 40, somebody has to open that time capsule, read what's inside, and figure out what it actually means in today's dollars, today's assets, today's reality. And that's where a CDFA comes in. So today I want to walk you through prenups and postnups, not from the legal side, because that's not my lane, but from the financial side, what they actually contain, where they get challenged, what myths I hear constantly from clients, including one about child support that I need you to unlearn right now if you believe it. And I want to talk about a role that I think is still underused in this industry, bringing a CDFA in before the wedding, not just after the divorce filing. So let's get into it.
Prenup And Postnup Defined
SPEAKER_01Let's start with some definitions. Because I think people use prenup as this catch-all scary word without really knowing what's inside one. A prenuptial agreement is a contract to people sign before they get married. It lays out how assets, debts, and financial obligations get treated if the marriage ends, whether that's divorce, legal separation, or even death. A post-nuptial agreement does the exact same job, but it's signed after the wedding, once the marriage is already underway. And I want to push back on the idea that these are somehow unromantic or a sign that someone doesn't trust their partner. In my experience, the couples who do this well are doing some of the most mature financial planning of their entire relationship. They're protecting a business, one of them built from nothing. They're preserving inheritance for kids from a first marriage. They're just being honest with each other about what's coming into the marriage and what isn't. When these are drafted well and executed properly, they don't just shape the outcome of a divorce. A lot of the time, they determine it, which is exactly why the financial terms inside them matter so much. Now here's where a CDFA comes in and gets pulled into cases. These documents get handed to me, to us, sometimes years, sometimes decades after they were signed. And we're asked to make sense of them. Not to decide if they're enforceable. That's not our job. And I'll say that about six more times today because it matters that much. Our job is to look at the financial terms and ask: does this still reflect reality? Is the asset schedule accurate? Is the valuation language even usable anymore? Because I promise you, a schedule that was accurate on a wedding day in 2010 is not automatically accurate today. Assets get commingled, businesses get refinanced, retirement accounts get rolled over into new accounts with new names and marital money added to it. The paper doesn't always keep up with the life.
The Financial Clauses Inside Prenups
SPEAKER_01First, separate property schedules. This is usually an exhibit, sometimes attached at the back, that lists out specific assets a house, an investment account, a business interest, a retirement account, and designates them as separate non-marital property, meaning off the table, not subject to division in case of a divorce. Here's a real-world wrinkle I see constantly. Let's say a client comes to me with a schedule from 2008 listing a fidelity brokerage account valued at $180,000, designated in the prenup as separate property. Great. Except that account was closed in 2015 and the proceeds were rolled into a joint account with new contributions made throughout the marriage. Is that still separate property? Maybe. Maybe not. That's a tracing question, and it's exactly the kind of thing I flag for the attorney, because the schedule as written doesn't reflect what actually happened to the money. Second, appreciation clauses. This is a big one, and it trips people up constantly. There's a difference between passive appreciation, meaning the asset just grew because the market grew, nobody did anything to make that happen, and active appreciation, meaning the value grew because someone worked at it, invested time and effort and marital energy into growing it. Courts often treat passive appreciation as staying separate, and active appreciation as becoming fair game for division. We'll come back to this with a full case study in a bit, because this is genuinely one of the most financially complex issues that I deal with. Third, income allocation. If someone owns a rental property, let's say, before the marriage, and that property produces $30,000 a year in rental income during the marriage, does that income stay separate or does it become marital income? The agreement should say. A lot of them don't say clearly, and that ambiguity becomes a fight. Fourth, spousal support waivers. Someone can waive alimony fully or partially in a prenup. But, and this is important, courts can still refuse to enforce that waiver if it would leave someone destitute, unable to support themselves, essentially pushed onto public assistance. So a full waiver isn't bulletproof just because it's on paper. Fifth, business ownership protections. Restricting the non-owner spouse's claim on a business, its goodwill, its future appreciation. This overlaps heavily with that appreciation clause issue. And sixth, debt allocation, simply assigning premarital debt, student loans, a business loan, credit card debt to the person who brought it into the marriage. Six categories. Every prenup I've ever reviewed touches at least a few of these. And every single one of them requires a financial professional's eye, not just a legal read.
How Prenups Hold Up Or Fail
SPEAKER_01Okay, let's talk about when these things actually do hold up in court because I get asked this constantly, and I want to be really clear about my lane here. I am not an attorney. I don't render legal opinions, but I've sat next to enough attorneys through enough of these cases to know the general landscape. And it's useful for you to understand it too. Generally, courts uphold the prenup when both people entered it voluntarily, both had the chance to get their own independent legal counsel, both provided full financial disclosure, and the terms aren't unconscionable at the time someone tries to enforce them. Where these get challenged, fraud, meaning someone materially misrepresented their assets or income, duress or coercion, pressure so severe it basically overrodes someone's free will. Undue influence, which shows up a lot in post notes because the power dynamics are just different once you're already married and there's more at stake in the relationship. And severe misrepresentation. The classic example being someone hides a business that's actually worth 10 times what they disclosed. Courts also look hard at how the thing was signed. If someone got handed a 50-page agreement the night before the wedding with zero time to review it, zero opportunity to consult an attorney, that's a procedural problem. And it can sync the whole agreement, regardless of what it says. Now, here's the myth.
The Social Security And Support Myth
SPEAKER_01I want you to really absorb this one because I hear it from clients all the time and it is flat out wrong. Clients believe a prenup can waive their right to social security benefits and child support. It cannot. Full stop. Social security, this is not a gray area. This is not, it depends on the state. This is federal law. A prenuptial agreement cannot waive either party's right to apply for and receive Social Security benefits, including spousal benefits. That right comes from federal statute. Two private individuals signing a contract in front of a notary do not have the authority to override federal law. So if you have a client who says, Well, my prenup says I gave up any claim to his social security, that belief, however sincerely held, is incorrect. And it's worth a general correction because I've seen people make bad settlement decisions based on that exact kind of misunderstanding. Related myth I mentioned a few seconds ago, similar energy. People think you can write child support terms into a prenup and lock them in forever. You cannot. And the reasoning, it makes sense once you think about it for a second. The child isn't a party to the contract. The child never consented to it. So two parents cannot bargain away support that belongs legally to their child. Courts treat this as public policy, plain and simple. No state is going to enforce a clause that waives or caps future child support, even if both spouses signed it with a smile on their face and a lawyer in the room. A judge will look at that clause and just set it aside when the support calculation happens. Courts also always retain jurisdiction over child support. That means it can be modified down the road regardless of what number or formula the prenup tried to lock in. This is different from spousal support, which, as we just talked about, actually can be weight or limited within reason. Child support just is not in that category. Now, some prenups will still include child-related provisions, things like an agreement to split private school tuition or an understanding about who covers college. Those can be meaningful and worth including, but they layer on top of the statutory child support guidelines. They don't replace them. Now we're going to take a quick break and hear from our sponsor, Dawn Divorce Association for Women.
SPEAKER_02When you're facing divorce, you deserve an advocate who understands what you're going through and who's dedicated to protecting your future. At Dawn, Divorce Attorneys for Women, our mission is simple: to help women move forward with clarity, confidence, and strong legal guidance. Whether you're just starting the process or feeling overwhelmed by what comes next, our team is here to support you every step of the way. Schedule a free consultation today and learn how we can help you take back control of your life. Visit women's rights.com slash free consultation video to get started.
How I Analyze Prenups In Divorce
SPEAKER_01Okay, we're back. So let's say a divorce is already underway and there's a prenup sitting on the table. What am I actually doing with it? Four things really. One, I review every financial term in the document. I'm not skimming it. I'm reading every asset schedule, every valuation methodology, every income definition, every debt allocation clause, every support provision. Two, I assess the impact on equitable distribution. Which assets does this agreement appear to pull outside of marital division? Which ones does it leave on the table for the court to allocate or the parties? Three, I flag financial terms that look materially unfair given where things stand today. If a schedule says a business was worth $300,000 and it's now worth $2.1 million, it's not my job to argue about. That's the attorney's job, but it is absolutely my job to make sure the attorney sees that number and understands the magnitude of the gap. Four, I identify data gaps, old valuations that were never updated, assets that have since been commingled into joint accounts or marital funds contributed, assets that literally don't exist anymore in the form the agreement describes, terms that are just undefined and vague. All of that gets flagged for further digging when I look through a prenup. And through every bit of this, I'm using scope-limited language. I say things like based on the financial terms of the agreement or consistent with the asset schedules attached. Or this analysis does not constitute a legal opinion on enforceability. That's not me covering myself. That's me staying in my lane as a financial professional, which if you've listened to this podcast before, you know I take very seriously. I am not a lawyer. I'm a financial expert, giving clear numbers so you and your attorney can make informed decisions.
Case Study: $0 Or $900,000
SPEAKER_01Patricia and David sign a prenup before their wedding. Standard separate property language, each person keeps what they brought into the marriage, plus whatever that property appreciates in value, as long as it stays separate. At the time of the wedding, David owns a business. It's appraised right around the wedding at $300,000. Small operation, handful of employees. Fast forward 12 years. David has worked in that business full-time every single day, the entire marriage. He's reinvested the profits back into it instead of taking them out and using it as income during the marriage. He's grown the client base, hired more people, expanded the service lines. Today, that business is appraised at $2.1 million. That's a $1.8 million increase. And now the question on the table is whose $1.8 million is that? Patricia's attorney says that's active appreciation. That growth exists because David poured his labor, his marital labor, into that business for 12 years. That's not passive market growth. That's Patricia's husband showing up every day and building something. And Patricia was right there as his spouse the entire time, supporting that effort, running the household, maybe even contributing unpaid labor to the business itself. That appreciation should be treated as marital property, says her attorney, prenup or not. David's attorney says, no, the prenup separate property clause covers this. The business itself was separate property, and its appreciation, however it happened, is covered by that same separate property language. It stays David's. Now, I want to be really clear again about where I sit in this fight. I don't decide who's right. That's genuinely not my role. And honestly, it's way above my pay grade as a financial professional. That's a legal question about how this specific state interprets active versus passive appreciation clauses. And it's going to come down to case law and how a judge might read the specific language of this specific agreement. What I do is build the numbers on both sides of that fight so the humans involved can actually make a decision. So the first scenario that I would run, the prenup is fully enforced as written. Patricia walks away with zero dollars of that business, zero, 12 years of marriage, and on paper, none of that 1.8 million touches her settlement. And I model out what she looks like financially and what her husband looks like financially based on that division of assets, taking into consideration their other assets, their future income, and their future living expenses. Scenario two, I show what happens if Patricia's challenge succeeds and the court were to treat that appreciation as marital, subject to a 50-50 split. That puts roughly $900,000 in Patricia's column. Zero dollars or $900,000. That's not a small gap. That's the entire difference between walking away from a 12-year marriage with almost nothing or walking away with real financial security. And when I lay both of those numbers out cleanly, side by side, in a financial projection or model, both attorneys can look at, that's when real settlement conversations can start happening. Because now everybody's negotiating against real numbers instead of vague legal theory. That's the value that a CDFA brings in. Not an opinion on who wins, but a clear picture of what winning or losing actually costs both people. And of course, a CDFA in this situation would also flag that a business appraiser needs to come in to be consulted about putting a current value on the business, even though it is covered by the prenup. And that would be a call that the attorney and client and business appraiser would make together.
Building Better Prenups Before Marriage
SPEAKER_01I want to spend our last few minutes on something I think our industry doesn't talk about enough, which is everything I just described happens on the back end. A divorce is already filed, a prenup already exists, and we're picking through it after the fact. But there's an entire other role for a CDFA, and it happens before any of that, during the actual drafting of the prenup, before the couple is even married. At that stage, my job isn't to find the weaknesses in a document. It's to help build the foundation that doesn't have weaknesses in the first place. That starts with a genuinely thorough accounting. Every asset, every debt, every income source, every piece of separate property, all organized into a real spreadsheet that becomes the actual exhibits attached to the agreement. And I can't stress enough how much the accuracy of that baseline matters. That's the date of marriage snapshot. 20 years from now, if someone's trying to trace whether an asset stayed separate, that baseline is the entire foundation the tracing argument stands on. Sloppy work at this stage creates exactly the mess we just walked through with Patricia and David. Beyond disclosure, I can also actually model out how these provisions play out. If there's an appreciation clause in there, I can build projections, five years, 10 years, 20 years down the line, showing both parties in real numbers what that clause actually means in practice. Not legal theory, actual dollars. This is especially valuable with business owners, executive compensation situations, anyone with real premarital wealth, because formulas are really abstract until you attach numbers to them, and then suddenly everyone in the room understands exactly what they're agreeing to. And I will argue this benefits both people in the relationship, not just whoever's wealthier walking in. There's almost always some imbalance in financial sophistication between two people negotiating a prenup. A CDFA can sit in that room as a neutral party and make sure both people understand what they're signing, not just the wealthier spouse's version of the story. That's real informed consent, not a one-sided negotiation dressed up to look fair. And here's the bonus: an agreement built this way, thorough, well organized, grounded in real numbers, isn't just more likely to survive a future legal challenge. It also gives the marriage itself a foundation of financial clarity and transparency from day one. Whether that prenup ever gets pulled out of a drawer again or not. So if you're an attorney and you're listening to this and you've got a prenup sitting in a client's file that's 10, 15, 20 years old, don't assume the numbers still hold up. Get a CDFA to actually look at it before you build a strategy around it. And if you're someone getting married or already married and thinking about a post knob, don't let this be one of the financial document in your the one financial document in your life that nobody ever double checks. Bring in a neutral financial professional or a CDFA as your advocate. Get real numbers on the table, and then go into that agreement with your eyes open. Patricia's story didn't have to end with her wondering what she'd signed 12 years earlier. It could have started with her fully understanding it. And that's the difference that a CDFA can make in this work on the front end and on the back end.
Closing Thoughts And Next Steps
SPEAKER_01Thank you for spending this time with me. If this episode was useful, share it with an attorney, a colleague, or a friend who needs to hear it. And I will see you next time on Divorce Rich. Thank you so much for taking time out of your day to listen to Divorce Rich Podcast. If you like this podcast, please follow us on Apple or anywhere that you download podcasts and share this link with any friends or family that you think might benefit from this information.
Podcasts we love
Check out these other fine podcasts recommended by us, not an algorithm.
HerMoney with Jean Chatzky
Jean Chatzky Her Money
The Hardcore Therapist
Sarah