Putin's Warning to "Western Elites". iPhone Zero-Click Vulnerability.

🌍 Global Intelligence Weekly Wrap-Up | February 28, 2025

🔎 This week, we dive into the most pressing intelligence and national security stories shaping the world. From China’s transnational repression to India’s alleged foreign interference in Canada, Taiwan’s undersea cable sabotage, and North Korean troops in Ukraine—these stories reveal the ever-shifting landscape of global intelligence.

🕵️‍♂️ With over 25 years of experience in intelligence and law enforcement, Neil Bisson, Director of the Global Intelligence Knowledge Network, breaks down the key developments you need to know.

📢 In This Episode:

A 19-year-old pro-democracy activist from Hong Kong is wanted by Beijing—despite living in the UK. What does this mean for dissidents abroad?
A new investigation reveals an Indian businessman accused of foreign interference in Canada. How deep does this go?
Taiwan detains a Chinese-crewed ship suspected of sabotaging an undersea internet cable. Is this part of a larger strategy?
The NSA urges iPhone users to enable Apple’s Lockdown Mode. Should you be worried about spyware?
Over 100 U.S. intelligence officers were fired under controversial circumstances. What’s really going on?
North Korea sends troops to Russia—with some reportedly deployed to Ukraine’s front lines. How will this impact the war?
Vladimir Putin warns Western elites against interfering in U.S.-Russia relations—while his regime continues cyberattacks and military aggression.
📌 Chapters:
00:00 - Intro
01:40 - China’s Transnational Repression & the Case of Chloe Cheung
06:15 - Canada Accuses Indian Businessman of Foreign Interference
11:20 - Taiwan Detains Chinese-Crewed Ship Over Undersea Cable Sabotage
15:30 - NSA Warns iPhone Users: Turn On Lockdown Mode
18:45 - 100+ U.S. Intelligence Officers Fired—What’s Going On?
21:30 - North Korean Troops in Ukraine: A Game-Changer?
24:00 - Putin’s Warning to the West
25:30 - Outro & Ways to Support the Show

✅ Support the Show:
Help keep intelligence analysis independent! Support via Patreon patreon.com/NeilBisson or Buzzsprout

Transcript

2025 02 28 Global Intelligence Weekly Wrap Up

Learn about Human source motivations from the online U of Ottawa course I'm teaching. 

https://pdinstitute.uottawa.ca/PDI/Courses/National-Security/The-Psychology-Behind-Human-Sources/Course.aspx?CourseCode=S0236

INTRO: 

Welcome to this week’s Global Intelligence Weekly Wrap-Up, where we break down the most pressing intelligence and national security stories shaping the world.

With over 25 years of experience in intelligence and law enforcement, Neil Bisson—Director of the Global Intelligence Knowledge Network and a retired Intelligence Officer with the Canadian Security Intelligence Service—brings you expert insights into the key developments you need to know.

This week, we examine China’s growing use of transnational repression as a 19-year-old pro-democracy activist from Hong Kong finds herself on Beijing’s wanted list—despite living in the UK. 

What does this mean for dissidents abroad, and how is the UK responding?

Meanwhile, a new investigation reveals an Indian businessman accused of foreign interference in Canada, with alleged ties to intelligence operations aimed at swaying political discourse. 

How deep does this go, and what are the broader implications for Canada-India relations?

We’re also covering Taiwan’s detention of a Chinese-crewed ship suspected of sabotaging an undersea internet cable, the NSA’s urgent advisory for iPhone users to enable Apple’s Lockdown Mode to counter sophisticated spyware threats, and the mass firing of over 100 U.S. intelligence officers under controversial circumstances.

Plus, North Korea has reportedly sent more troops to Russia, with some deployed to Ukraine’s front lines. 

Is this a game-changer for the war?

And finally, Vladimir Putin warns Western elites against interfering in U.S.-Russia relations—while his regime continues cyberattacks, sabotage, and military aggression. 

What’s really at play here?

Stay tuned as Neil unpacks these urgent developments.

Now, let’s get started.


MUSIC

Hello Everyone, and welcome back to another episode of Global Intelligence Weekly Wrap Up.

I’m Neil Bisson, your host and the Director of the Global Intelligence Knowledge Network. 

The world is seeing some major political shifts again this week, that will have unprecedented effects on global security and intelligence sharing. 

But like every week in the world of intelligence, there’s a lot to cover. So let’s get started. 

For our first story this week, we’re looking at the case of Chloe Cheung, a 19-year-old pro-democracy activist from Hong Kong now living in the UK. 

Once just an A-level student, Chloe has found herself on a Chinese government wanted list, with a $100,000 bounty placed on her by Hong Kong police. 

This raises serious questions about transnational repression—when authoritarian states reach beyond their borders to silence critics.

Chloe’s activism began during the 2019 Hong Kong protests, where she witnessed police crackdowns firsthand. 

She and her family relocated to the UK in 2021 under Britain’s special visa scheme for people from Hong Kong. 

However, even in exile, she has remained outspoken, working for a pro-democracy NGO and advocating for the rights of people from Hong Kong.

In December 2024, Hong Kong police issued arrest warrants for Chloe and four others, accusing them of violating the National Security Law—Beijing’s sweeping legislation that criminalizes dissent, even abroad. 

Chloe now faces serious risks, as China has been known to use intimidation, surveillance, and even violence against dissidents overseas.

This case isn't just about one activist—it’s a clear example of China's broader strategy of transnational repression. 

We've seen similar cases where Hong Kong dissidents abroad have been harassed, attacked, or had their families in Hong Kong targeted as leverage.

The Chinese government has been cracking down on Hong Kong dissidents since the 2019 protests. 

In 2020, Beijing imposed the National Security Law, which severely restricted freedoms in Hong Kong. 

Since then, independent newspapers have been shut down, activists imprisoned, and many forced into exile.

Chloe isn’t alone—her name joins a growing list of activists targeted by Chinese authorities. 

This follows previous arrest warrants for prominent figures like Nathan Law, Simon Cheng, and others who have fled Hong Kong but continue their advocacy abroad.

The UK has responded with a strong retort, with Foreign Secretary David Lammy stating that the government will not tolerate foreign intimidation on British soil. 

However, as UK-China relations evolve—particularly in trade—there’s concern that political pressure to hold China accountable may weaken.

Chloe herself has spoken out, saying she refuses to be silenced despite the risks. 

She’s been actively lobbying in Westminster, recently meeting with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and shadow foreign secretary Priti Patel. 

Patel reinforced the need to push back against transnational repression, stating, “We must not give an inch to any transnational repression in the UK.”

However, there are real concerns that the UK may not be doing enough. 

In recent years, there have been reports of Chinese state-linked intimidation tactics against dissidents abroad. 

Last May, British police arrested three men accused of gathering intelligence on Hong Kong activists in the UK—one of them was later found dead under suspicious circumstances.

This case highlights how authoritarian regimes are expanding their reach beyond their borders. 

The use of arrest warrants and bounties against activists like Chloe Cheung signals Beijing's willingness to intimidate and silence critics, even in democratic nations.

Some key questions come to mind: 

How will countries like the UK respond? 

And although strong statements are one thing, will there be real action to protect dissidents from foreign interference?

MUSIC

We move onto Canada for our next story, where we're delving into a pressing issue that strikes at the heart of national security and sovereignty: foreign interference. 

Our focus is on a recent Global News investigation titled 'Canada accuses Indian businessman of foreign interference, disinformation.' 

This report sheds light on the alleged activities of the Srivastava Group and its attempts to influence Canadian politics and public opinion.

The Global News article reveals that the Srivastava Group, an Indian conglomerate, has been implicated in efforts to sway Canadian politicians and disseminate disinformation. 

According to documents from the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, Ankit Srivastava, the group's vice-chair, was reportedly tasked by Indian intelligence agencies to identify and influence Canadian politicians. 

This involved providing financial assistance and propaganda materials to garner support for issues favorable to India.

Furthermore, the Srivastava Group has been accused of creating fake news websites, some masquerading as Canadian outlets, to propagate pro-India narratives and criticize Pakistan. 

Such actions represent a sophisticated strategy to manipulate public perception and interfere in Canada's democratic processes.

Foreign interference is not a new phenomenon in Canada. 

Historically, nations like China and Russia have been prominent actors in such activities.

However, recent reports indicate that India has become increasingly active in this realm. 

The assassination of Sikh activist Hardeep Singh Nijjar in Surrey, British Columbia, in June 2023, allegedly linked to Indian operatives, has further strained Canada-India relations and underscored the severity of foreign interference threats.

The creation of fake news websites by entities like the Srivastava Group exemplifies modern disinformation tactics. 

By mimicking legitimate news sources, these platforms can effectively spread misleading information, making it challenging for the public to discern truth from falsehood.

Justice Marie-Josée Hogue, leading a public inquiry into foreign interference, emphasized the gravity of disinformation, labeling it an 'existential threat' to democracies. 

She highlighted the necessity for governments to act swiftly and transparently to counter such evolving threats.

From my perspective, these revelations underscore the importance of robust counterintelligence measures and public awareness. 

Democracies must be vigilant against covert operations that aim to undermine their institutions and societal cohesion.

The allegations against the Srivastava Group highlight the multifaceted nature of foreign interference, encompassing both direct political influence and sophisticated disinformation campaigns. 

As these threats evolve, so too must our strategies to combat them. 

It's imperative for governments, institutions, and the public to collaborate in safeguarding our democratic values and processes.

MUSIC

In this next story, we turn our attention to a critical infrastructure issue with profound national security implications: the vulnerability of undersea internet cables. 

Our discussion is anchored on a recent CNN report titled 'Taiwan detains Chinese-crewed ship suspected of cutting undersea cable.' 

This incident highlights the fragility of the infrastructure that underpins our global communications and the strategic challenges it presents.

According to the CNN report, Taiwanese authorities have detained a ship with a Chinese crew on suspicion of severing an undersea internet cable. 

This event has significant ramifications, as undersea cables are the backbone of global internet connectivity, carrying over 95% of international data. 

The deliberate or accidental disruption of these cables can lead to substantial communication outages, economic losses, and potential national security threats.

In response to the vulnerabilities exposed by such incidents, Taiwan's space agency has been proactive. 

As reported by CNN in May 2024, the agency is developing its own version of a satellite internet system akin to 'Starlink.' 

This initiative aims to ensure that Taiwan remains connected even if its undersea cable infrastructure is compromised during a conflict. 

This move not only enhances Taiwan's resilience but also serves as a deterrent against potential adversaries contemplating infrastructure sabotage.

Undersea cables have long been recognized as critical yet vulnerable infrastructure. 

Their importance is underscored by the fact that they facilitate global financial transactions, communications, and data transfers. 

The strategic significance of these cables has prompted nations and alliances to take protective measures. 

For instance, in January 2025, NATO launched the Baltic Sentry mission to safeguard undersea cables in the Baltic Sea after incidents of damage. 

This mission reflects a growing awareness of the need to protect these vital assets from both state and non-state actors.

The incident involving the Chinese-crewed ship near Taiwan is not isolated. 

Similar events have raised concerns globally about the security of undersea cables. 

The potential for espionage, data theft, or crippling communication disruptions makes the protection of these cables a priority for national security agencies worldwide.

Experts have long warned about the vulnerabilities associated with undersea cables. 

American journalist and political commentator, Fareed Zakaria stated in a November 2022 segment on CNN that actors like Russia could sabotage global communications by targeting these cables. 

He emphasized that the physical security of these infrastructures is as crucial as cybersecurity measures.

From my professional standpoint, this is another example of the bold recklessness surrounding hybrid warfare that countries like Russia and China are taking against western countries and their allies. 

The detention of the Chinese-crewed ship by Taiwanese authorities underscores the necessity for stringent monitoring and protection of undersea cables. 

Nations must invest in both technological solutions, such as satellite internet systems, and physical security measures to safeguard these critical infrastructures.

In conclusion, the recent incident near Taiwan serves as a reminder of the vulnerabilities inherent in our global communication infrastructure. 

As geopolitical tensions persist, the security of undersea cables becomes increasingly paramount. 

Nations must adopt a multifaceted approach, combining technological innovation with robust security protocols, to protect these vital assets.

MUSIC

Our next story focuses on a critical cybersecurity advisory that affects millions of iPhone users worldwide. 

The National Security Agency, or NSA, has recently recommended enabling Apple's Lockdown Mode to counter sophisticated spyware threats. 

This discussion is based on insights from a Forbes article entitled 'Spy Agency Tells iPhone Users: Turn On Apple Security Feature.’

The Forbes article highlights the NSA's advisory urging iPhone users to activate Apple's Lockdown Mode. 

This feature, introduced to combat advanced spyware attacks, significantly restricts device functionality to minimize potential vulnerabilities. 

By limiting certain features, Lockdown Mode reduces the attack surface available to malicious actors, thereby enhancing the device's security posture.

The NSA's recommendation stems from increasing concerns over sophisticated spyware capable of infiltrating devices without user interaction, known as zero-click attacks. 

Such malware can access sensitive data, monitor communications, and compromise personal and professional information. 

Enabling Lockdown Mode serves as a proactive measure to protect against these advanced threats.

Zero-click attacks have become a prominent concern in the cybersecurity landscape. 

Unlike traditional malware that requires user interaction, these attacks exploit vulnerabilities to gain control over devices silently. 

Notable incidents, such as Operation Triangulation, have demonstrated the potential for widespread compromise of devices through such methods.

In response to these threats, Apple introduced Lockdown Mode as part of its ongoing efforts to enhance user security. 

This feature is designed for individuals at heightened risk of targeted attacks, including journalists, activists, and government officials. 

By enabling Lockdown Mode, users can add an extra layer of defense against sophisticated cyber espionage tools.

Cybersecurity experts emphasize the importance of proactive measures in safeguarding personal devices. 

The NSA's advisory aligns with best practices for individuals who may be targets of advanced persistent threats. 

While Lockdown Mode imposes certain limitations on device functionality, the trade-off is a substantial increase in security.

From the perspective of a retired intelligence professional, enabling Lockdown Mode is a prudent step for those who handle sensitive information or believe they may be targets of sophisticated cyber-attacks. 

It's essential to balance usability with security, and in high-risk scenarios, prioritizing protection is paramount.

The NSA's recommendation to activate Apple's Lockdown Mode underscores the evolving nature of cyber threats and the necessity for robust security measures. 

As attackers develop more advanced techniques, users must adopt proactive strategies to protect their data and privacy. 

Enabling Lockdown Mode is a significant step in mitigating the risks associated with zero-click spyware attacks.

MUSIC

Our next story delves into a significant development within the U.S. intelligence community.

Recent reports indicate that Director of U.S. National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard has terminated over 100 intelligence officers. 

The official reason provided centers on allegations that these individuals participated in inappropriate discussions on a secure government messaging platform. 

This action has sparked discussions about the underlying motivations and broader implications of such a substantial dismissal.

The administration cites misconduct related to "obscene" and sexually explicit discussions on Intelink, a secure platform designated for operational communications. 

Engaging in such discussions on a professional platform raises legitimate concerns about professionalism and the appropriate use of government resources.

However, this event occurs within a broader context of the current administration's efforts to reshape federal agencies. 

It also does not account for any consideration of the rights of workers.

There has been a notable pattern of dismissals in the United States across various sectors, including intelligence, law enforcement, and the military. 

Many of these actions have been justified on grounds of eliminating inefficiencies, addressing perceived corruption, and dismantling Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion programs. 

Federal agencies have been directed to submit plans for significant staff reductions, with the goal of removing underperforming employees and reducing non-essential roles.

Additionally, the administration has faced scrutiny due to legal challenges involving President Trump. 

Notably, there have been indictments related to the alleged mishandling of classified documents at the Mar-a-Lago estate and charges concerning hush money payments to adult film actress Stormy Daniels. 

These legal challenges have shaped many of the administration’s decisions regarding personnel and agency restructuring.

The dismissal of over 100 intelligence officers is unprecedented in its scale. 

While the official justification pertains to misconduct, it is essential to consider the broader pattern of personnel changes within federal agencies. 

The administration has actively worked to dismantle DEI programs, advocating for a shift towards "merit-based" systems. 

This approach has led to significant restructuring and the removal of individuals associated with previous initiatives.

Moreover, the legal challenges facing President Trump have intensified the administration's focus on loyalty and alignment within federal agencies. 

The intersection of these legal issues with the recent dismissals raises questions about potential motivations beyond the stated reasons.

Critics argue that the mass firings may serve dual purposes: addressing misconduct and facilitating the replacement of personnel with individuals more aligned with the administration's current policies and perspectives. 

This perspective suggests a strategic effort to reshape the intelligence community in a manner consistent with the administration's objectives.

Conversely, supporters contend that maintaining professionalism and appropriate conduct within secure platforms is paramount. 

From this viewpoint, the dismissals are a necessary measure to uphold the integrity and operational security of intelligence activities.

The termination of over 100 intelligence officers under the pretext of misconduct presents a complex scenario. 

While the official reasons highlight concerns about professionalism, the broader context of administrative restructuring and ongoing legal challenges suggests additional layers of motivation. 

This development prompts critical questions about the balance between ensuring professional conduct and potential political influences within the intelligence community.

As this situation continues to evolve, it remains imperative to monitor how these actions impact the effectiveness and impartiality of intelligence operations.

MUSIC

We head to South Korea for our next story where we’re examining reports from their intelligence agency that North Korea has deployed more troops to Russia, with some being repositioned to the frontlines in Ukraine’s western Kursk region. 

The exact number remains uncertain, but estimates suggest at least 1,000 additional troops.

This deepens the military collaboration between Moscow and Pyongyang, raising concerns over battlefield dynamics and the broader geopolitical consequences.

According to South Korean intelligence, North Korean troops have been engaged in combat operations alongside Russian forces for at least four months. 

These troops reportedly suffered heavy losses, with estimates suggesting at least 1,000 North Korean soldiers have been killed. 

Despite early reports of their absence from the battlefield, they were recently redeployed to the front lines in February.

This raises some important questions:

• How effective are these North Korean troops in modern warfare?

• What does their presence signal about Russia’s military needs and strategy?

• How does this impact the ongoing war in Ukraine?

From an intelligence perspective, North Korea’s involvement provides insight into its growing military alliance with Russia. 

Both nations have historically been isolated from the West, and their partnership appears to be deepening—not just through military collaboration but also through security agreements.

North Korea’s participation in the war follows a series of high-level engagements between Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong Un. 

In October, reports surfaced of North Korean troops arriving in Russia, coinciding with the signing of a security and defense treaty between the two nations.

However, there are serious doubts about their effectiveness. 

Early intelligence assessments suggest these troops are ill-prepared for modern battlefield conditions, particularly against Ukrainian drone warfare. 

Still, they shouldn't be underestimated—North Korean forces are known for their discipline, endurance, and ability to operate under harsh conditions.

Russia’s strategic use of foreign troops, including those from the Wagner Group and now North Korea, highlights its struggle to maintain manpower while sustaining heavy casualties.

Defectors and military analysts caution against dismissing the capabilities of North Korean soldiers. 

While they may lack experience with advanced Western weaponry, they are battle-hardened and accustomed to extreme conditions. 

Additionally, their deployment signals an increasing reliance on unconventional alliances by Moscow, which could further complicate the war.

Meanwhile, Ukraine continues to hold ground in the Kursk region despite Russia’s attempts to push them back. 

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has acknowledged the return of North Korean troops to the front line, reinforcing concerns about escalating foreign involvement in the war.

North Korea’s growing military engagement in Ukraine is another example of how global alliances are shifting. 

This isn’t just a war between Russia and Ukraine—it’s increasingly drawing in other nations, whether through direct military assistance or strategic partnerships.

Looking ahead, key questions remain:

• Will North Korea continue sending more troops, and at what cost?

• How will Ukraine and its allies counter this development?

• Could this set a precedent for other nations to get further involved?

I’ll be keeping a close eye on these developments.

MUSIC

For our last story this week, we're heading to the Kremlin where we’re critically examining recent statements by Russian President Vladimir Putin. 

Russia’s President has cautioned “Western elites” against undermining a potential rapprochement between Russia and the United States. 

Given Russia's track record of suppressing dissent, engaging in sabotage operations, and conducting cyberattacks against Western nations, it's imperative to scrutinize the implications of Putin's remarks.

President Putin's assertions come against a backdrop of Russia's own aggressive actions. 
Domestically, his administration has systematically stifled dissent through severe human rights abuses. 

Internationally, Russia has been implicated in sabotage operations, particularly in the Baltic Sea, targeting infrastructure of neighboring countries that oppose its nationalistic and oppressive policies.

Moreover, Russia's unprovoked invasion of Ukraine has destabilized the region, leading to significant geopolitical tensions. 

Concurrently, the United States has signaled to Ukraine that NATO membership is not forthcoming, while expressing interest in Ukraine's critical mineral resources. 

This juxtaposition raises questions about the broader strategic objectives at play.

Additionally, Russia's extensive history of cyberattacks against Western countries further undermines its credibility. 

These actions have targeted critical infrastructure, electoral processes, and private enterprises, posing significant threats to national security and democratic institutions.

Historically, Russia has employed a dual strategy of internal repression and external aggression to consolidate power. 

The resurgence of Soviet-era tactics, such as punitive measures to silence political dissenters, exemplifies the lengths to which the Kremlin will go to maintain control.

In the Baltic region, a series of undersea cable disruptions have been reported, with investigations suggesting potential Russian involvement through their “shadow fleet”. 

These incidents have prompted NATO to enhance surveillance and security measures to protect vital infrastructure.

The invasion of Ukraine shows Russia's willingness to violate international law to achieve its geopolitical aims. 

This aggression has not only led to widespread human suffering but has also strained Russia's relations with the global community.

While President Putin portrays himself as a defender against Western interference, his actions tell a different story. 

The suppression of dissent within Russia, characterized by the detention of political activists and the enactment of repressive laws, highlights a regime intolerant of opposition.

International security analysts have raised alarms over Russia's sabotage activities in the Baltic Sea, viewing them as deliberate attempts to destabilize the region and intimidate neighboring countries. 

These actions are consistent with a broader strategy of hybrid warfare designed to exploit vulnerabilities and sow discord among Western allies.

Cybersecurity experts have documented numerous instances of Russian-sponsored cyberattacks, emphasizing the sophisticated nature of these operations and their potential to disrupt critical systems. 

Such activities reflect a broader strategy to undermine the security and stability of Western nations.

President Putin's warnings about Western elites sabotaging US-Russia relations appear disingenuous when contrasted with Russia's own actions. 

The Kremlin's suppression of internal dissent, engagement in sabotage operations, unprovoked military aggression, and persistent cyberattacks collectively pose a significant threat to Western freedoms and global stability.

This, taken in consideration with veiled threats that Putin would use the FSB to strike back against any Western Elites who sabotage the rapprochement, is a clear indication that his totalitarian approach to diplomacy has not changed. 

As we navigate these complex geopolitical dynamics, it's crucial to remain vigilant and critically assess the narratives presented by authoritarian regimes. 

Understanding the broader context of these actions enables us to better protect our democratic institutions and uphold the values of freedom and human rights.


Well, that’s it for this week. 

As always, the links to the open-source stories are in the transcript. 

If you appreciate getting the world of intelligence in 30 minutes or less, think about becoming a supporter of the show through Buzzsprout, or Patreon. 

Thanks for listening and be sure to share, like and leave a comment. 

Until next week, stay curious, stay informed and stay safe. 

MUSIC:

OUTRO:

That’s a wrap for this week’s Global Intelligence Weekly Wrap-Up.
From China’s transnational repression and India’s alleged foreign interference in Canada to Taiwan’s undersea cable concerns, North Korean troops in Ukraine, and Putin’s latest warnings—today’s stories reveal the complex and ever-shifting landscape of global intelligence.

Delivering these in-depth analyses takes time, expertise, and a commitment to uncovering the intelligence stories that matter most. 

Each episode is built on extensive research, careful analysis, and decades of experience in intelligence and law enforcement.

If you found today’s insights valuable, consider liking, sharing, or leaving a comment—it helps expand the conversation and grow the podcast’s reach.

And if you’d like to support the show and help keep these intelligence briefings coming, you can do so through Patreon or Buzzsprout. 

Whether it’s a one-time contribution or ongoing support, every bit helps us continue delivering expert analysis on the security issues shaping our world. You’ll find the links in the show notes.

Thank you for listening.

And as Neil always says: stay curious, stay informed, and stay safe. See you next week.

Support: 

Links: 
Story 1: The A-Level Student Who Became an Enemy of the Chinese State
Link: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c93lp2wd0qzo 

Story 2: Canada accuses Indian businessman of foreign interference, disinformation
Link: https://globalnews.ca/news/11015090/india-canada-foreign-interference-disinformation/

Story 3: Taiwan Detains a Chinese-Crewed Ship After Undersea Cable Severed
Link: https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/25/asia/taiwan-detains-ship-undersea-cable-intl-hnk/index.html

Story 4: Spy Agency Tells iPhone Users—Turn On Apple Security Feature
Link: https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/2025/02/25/spy-agency-tells-iphone-users-turn-on-apple-security-feature/

Story 5: Tulsi Gabbard fires more than 100 intelligence officers over messages in a chat tool
Link: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/gabbard-fires-100-intelligence-officers-messages-chat-tool-rcna193799

Story 6: North Korea has sent more troops to Russia, South's spy agency says
Link: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2rreg04dpo

Story 7: Putin warns Europe against sabotaging US-Russia rapprochement
Link: https://www.reuters.com/world/russias-putin-says-first-contacts-with-us-inspire-hope-2025-02-27/?utm_source=chatgpt.com