AI Café Conversations | AI for Executives: Leadership Insights | Transforming with AI

AI Feedback for Executives: Understanding the Neuroscience Behind Algorithm Criticism | Executive AI Training

• Sahar the AI Whisperer | Neuroscience Expert in AI and Leadership • Season 2 • Episode 19

Share episode

Send us a text

What if the feedback that could revolutionize your leadership effectiveness is the same feedback your brain is programmed to reject?

Join Sahar, The AI Whisperer, in this groundbreaking episode of AI Café Conversations as she reveals why executive brains process AI feedback through completely different neural pathways than human criticism - and why mastering this difference will separate future leaders from those left behind.

Discover the shocking truth: your evolutionary wiring that made you successful in human hierarchies is now your biggest obstacle to AI-enhanced leadership development. Through real conversations with Fortune 500 CEOs and senior executives, learn why algorithm feedback triggers status threats, defensive responses, and missed growth opportunities.

This isn't about replacing human judgment - it's about accessing unprecedented objectivity that humans can't provide. While your competitors resist AI feedback through outdated neural patterns, you'll learn the integration protocol that transforms algorithmic criticism into competitive advantage.

Key insights include why AI feedback activates threat responses, how to separate detection from decision-making, the objectivity advantage paradox, and the five-step protocol for productive AI feedback integration. All delivered in practical, neuroscience-based strategies designed for executive implementation.

Perfect for senior executives, C-suite leaders, and decision-makers who want to harness AI's most honest insights without losing leadership sovereignty. Learn why the most successful leaders aren't the most talented - they're the most coachable by artificial intelligence.

The choice is yours: continue filtering AI feedback through social threat systems, or develop neural pathways for objective performance optimization. Your competitive relevance depends on which path you choose.

Subscribe to AI Café Conversations for neuroscience insights that prepare executives for the future of leadership development.

Email me at sahar@saharconsulting.com with questions or topic suggestions for future episodes.

 My book "The Coach's Brain Meets AI" is available on Amazon, and I'll send extra guides if you email me after purchasing. Follow me on LinkedIn (Sahar Andrade) and Instagram (Sahar the Reinvent Coach). 

Subscribe now to start transforming your leadership with Human-Centered AI!

If you have any questions Email me at sahar@saharconsulting.com

Connect with me on Linkedin

Connect with me on IG: @saharthereinventcoach

#AI #Artificialintelligence #learningpodcast #DailyAI #leadershipcoach #executivepresence #BrainvsAI #neuroleadership #neuroscienceinleadership #Futureofwork #techtalk #innovation #AIpodcast #AIconversations #AIforeveryone #AIInsights #AItrends  #AICaféConversations #ChatGPT #NewWaveAI #AIExplained #TechSimplified  #AInotechrequired #HumancenteredAI 
#AIForEveryone #OptimizeAI #AIChatbot #TechPodcast #UnderstandingAI #AIInteraction #PersonalizedAI #neuroscience #AIforexecutives #humancenteredai #notechrequired #AItoolsforexecutives #AIandleadership #executivecoachingwithAI #AIcoachingtoolsforexecutives #executiveleadership #AIFeedback #Executivetraining #leadershipdevelopment

Support the show

Speaker 1:

Hello, hello, hello. This is Sahar Indral here, ai Whisperer, and welcome back to the AI Cafe Conversations. Yesterday, a Fortune 500 CEO told me something that stopped me cold. Sahar, when my board gives me critical feedback, I listen and adjust, but when AI tells me my strategic presentations need work, I want to throw my laptop out of the window. What's wrong with me? Actually, nothing is wrong with him. His brain is responding exactly as evolution designed it to, and that response could either unlock unprecedented executive growth or create a massive blind spot that cost him competitive advantage. Spot that cost him competitive advantage. Here is what most leaders don't realize your brain processes AI feedback through completely different neural pathways than human criticism. Understanding this difference isn't just understanding neuroscience. It's the key to whether you will harness AI as your most honest advisor or dismiss it as your most frustrating obstacle. Today we are diving into why algorithm feedback hits your executive brain differently and how to rewire your responses for breakthrough leadership development, because the executives who master this will own the future and will lead it. The ones that don't won't. So let me start by the feedback evolution mismatch.

Speaker 1:

Last month, a pharmaceutical executive shared something fascinating. She said I can handle brutal feedback from investors, tough criticism from my team, even harsh reviews from customers, but when AI grammar tools suggest changes to my writing, I feel personally attacked. Her reactions reveals a fundamental mismatch between how our brains evolve to process feedback and how AI delivers it. Human feedback comes with social context. Your brain reads facial expressions, tone of voice, relationship, history and intent. These social signals help your prefrontal cortex categorize feedback as constructive, malicious or protective. Ai feedback has none of these social markers. It's pure information without emotional wrapper. Your ancient brain doesn't know how to categorize it, so it defaults to what it knows best to threat assessment. A banking CEO described this perfectly. When my CFO questions my numbers, I see strategy discussion. When AI flag errors in my spreadsheet, I see judgment without appeal.

Speaker 1:

But here is what gets interesting. A technology executive told me that she had a breakthrough moment. Breakthrough moment I realized AI feedback is like having a brutally honest advisor with zero agenda, no politics, no fear of offending me, no career concerns, just truth. This is the opportunity most executives miss. Ai feedback represents something your brain has never encountered Completely objective assessment with no social manipulation. It's not trying to please you or impress you or even manage your emotions. However, your brain interprets this objectivity as coldness, which triggers defensive responses. Your amygdala reads no emotional contacts as potential threat and floods your system with cortisol or the stress chemical in your brain. I asked a retail executive to try an experiment. I asked a retail executive to try an experiment. Spend one week treating AI feedback like data from a diagnostic medical test rather than criticism from a person. She reported back game changer. Suddenly, I could hear what it was actually telling me instead of fighting it.

Speaker 1:

Here is what AI feedback gets psychologically complex for executives. A venture capital partner told me I built my career on being right. Ai constantly suggests I could do things better. It feels like it's questioning my competence. This is status threat activation and it's devastating for executive learning. Your brain status monitoring system evolved in social hierarchies where competence challenges could literally threaten survival. When AI suggests improvements, your brain doesn't think oh, that's helpful optimization. In contrary, it thinks competence under attack. The neuroscience is clear Status threats activate the same brain regions as physical pain. That's why AI feedback often feels like criticism hurts, even when it's objectively helpful.

Speaker 1:

Even it happened with me one day. I was using Claude and it reversed the table on me and started showing me what I was doing wrong. I got so offended that I actually wrote a complaint to Anthropic. That's how bad it got, okay. So a manufacturing CEO described the sensation when AI rewrites my emails part of me feels diminished, like it's saying I can't communicate effectively. His brain was interpreting enhancement as replacement. But here is what forward thinking executives are discovering. A financial services leader told me I reframed ai feedback as having a world-class consultant available 24-7. Now it feels like privilege and not critique.

Speaker 1:

The key insight here is that your brain reactions to AI feedback reveals more about your relationship with learning than AI's actual value. Executives comfortable with continuous improvement adapt quickly. Those who see expertise as fixed struggle intensely. I worked with another executive who initially resisted AI writing assistance. After six months of practice, she said AI feedback taught me more about clear communication than 20 years of human feedback. Humans were too polite to tell me my writing was unclear. This reveals AI feedback's hidden superpower. It's not limited by social politeness or correctness or relationship management. It tells you truth that humans often want. However, there is a critical caveat here. A consulting firm partner warned me AI feedback can become addictive. I started second guessing every decision, waiting for AI validation instead of trusting my judgment and, by the way, that happens a lot and you have to be extremely, extremely aware of that because we can get into the comfort of that.

Speaker 1:

The balance here is crucial. Ai feedback should inform your thinking, not replace it. Your executive intuition remains irreplaceable for context, relationships and strategic vision. There is something called the objectivity advantage paradox. The most successful executives I work with have discovered something counterintuitive. Ai feedback's lack of emotional intelligence is actually its greatest strength. So to explain this breakthrough, a team can give feedback filtered to an executive or a leader through their career concerns, their relationship with them, or with him or her and their mood that day.

Speaker 1:

Ai gives executives feedback based purely on effectiveness. It's like having a truth serum for their work. The objectivity creates unprecedented learning opportunities, but only if your brain can process it correctly. Most executives initially resist because we are hardwired to expect feedback to come with emotional scaffolding. When humans give feedback, they often cushion criticism with praise, often soften language to preserve relationships or avoid sensitive topics altogether. Ai has done none of this social editing. Remember there is something called when you give feedback, do like a sandwich, or do a kiss, slap, kiss or SBI. We always try to soften the landing right Because we care about other people's feelings, and this is something that AI is basically missing, and that's why AI has done none of this social editing.

Speaker 1:

So a real estate executive actually told me AI told me my presentation was confusing, repetitive and lacked clear conclusions. A human would have said, maybe consider tightening the focus. Both were right, but AI was more useful. However, this objectivity creates what I call the context gap. Ai can identify what's ineffective, but can't explain why it matters in your specific situation, and it's easy to discover these limitations. Ai, for example, can have a pitch that is tailored to whoever you want to, versus you creating creating, for example, a pitch to investors that is too technical, but AI cannot tell you that your investors, for example, specifically value deep scientific details. So you need actually both perspectives yours and AI. This reveals the optimal approach. Use AI feedback for objective assessment, then apply your contextual intelligence to determine relevance and implementation.

Speaker 1:

But here is where many executives make a critical error. They dismiss AI feedback when it conflicts with their assumptions, instead of investigating why the disconnect exists. So someone told me. One of them told me AI keeps flagging my leadership emails as too directive. They initially ignored it because their industry required clear commands. Then they realized that AI was detecting actually something else. The tone that they used was creating resistance, even when their content was right. The investigation led to a communication breakthrough that improved team responses rate by 40%. This shows AI feedback unique value. It can detect patterns you are blind to because you are inside the system. Your brain filters your own performance through unconscious biases. Ai doesn't have those filters. So how do we do integration protocol? So how do you train your executive brain to receive AI feedback productively? Here is a protocol I have developed through working with hundreds of leaders.

Speaker 1:

Step number one reframe the source. Instead of AI is criticizing me, think I'm getting a free performance audit from an objective system. Your brain needs a new category for this type of input, for example, trying to reframe and report on what happens. I heard someone tell me suddenly AI feedback felt like data instead of judgment. I could analyze it without defending myself. Step number two separate detection from decision. Ai excels at identifying patterns and gaps. You excel at understanding context and implications. Use AI for what it sees, not what it recommends. Step number three create feedback protocols.

Speaker 1:

An AI technology CEO told me I designated specific times for AI feedback review instead of constant correction throughout the day. I batch process insights weekly. This prevents feedback overwhelm while ensuring nothing important gets missed. Step number four track correlation, not causation. Ai can show you what's not working, but often can't explain why. Your job is connecting AI observation to business outcomes. Ai can flag client presentations, for example, as low engagement indicators and if you investigate that, you can discover, for example, that the data heavy slides, can lose audience attention. Ai detected the symptom, but as a human being and a human brain, you can find the cause. Now, step number five maintain decision sovereignty.

Speaker 1:

The biggest risk with AI feedback is not rejection, it's over dependence. Your executive judgment must remain primary. A venture capital executive warned I started deferring to AI feedback so much that I lost confidence in my own instincts. I had to recalibrate to use AI input without becoming AI dependent. The goal isn't replacing your judgment with AI's, but informing your judgment with AI objectivity. Your brain brings context, relationships, strategic vision and wisdom that AI cannot replicate. However, ai brings pattern detection, consistency analysis and bias-free assessment that your brain can't match. The combination is powerful, but only when properly integrated.

Speaker 1:

What about the competitive advantage reality? Here is the truth. Most executives are not ready to hear. Your relationship with AI feedback will determine your competitive relevance in the next five years. Leaders who master AI feedback integration will have unprecedented self-awareness and improvement velocity. Those who remain defensive will be operating with increasingly outdated information about their own effectiveness. A financial services CEO put it blindly my competitors who embrace AI feedback are getting real-time performance optimization. I'm getting feedback quarterly from humans who are afraid to tell me her truth. Who do you think will adapt faster?

Speaker 1:

But there is a deeper opportunity here. Ai feedback can help you develop skills that humans can teach, because humans can detect them. It can help you identify micro patterns in your communication that are created or is creating, unintended team dynamics. No human will ever notice these patterns because they are, or they might be too subtle. The micro-improvements compound over months and years into significant leadership advancement, but only if your brain can receive and integrate AI feedback without defensive filtering. The executives who will thrive are not necessarily the most talented. They are the most coachable by artificial intelligence.

Speaker 1:

This requires rewiring neural responses, that evolution designed for social feedback systems. Let me tell you this the payoff is extraordinary. Imagine having a completely honest, highly analytical advisor, available 24-7, with no agenda except improving your effectiveness. That's what AI feedback represents if your brain can access it. Ai feedback represents if your brain can access it. Your brain's resistance to AI feedback isn't personal failing. It's an evolution response to a novel situation. But resistance is optimal. Once you understand the neuroscience, the choice is yours at the end Continue processing AI feedback through social threat detection systems or develop new neural pathways for objective performance optimization. The executives who made this shift and I have seen it will have access to unprecedented self-awareness and improvement velocity. Those who don't will be competing with outdated information about their own capabilities. Remember, AI feedback is not trying to replace your judgment. It's trying to inform it. Your wisdom, context and strategic vision remain irrepressible. Context and strategic vision vision remain irrepressible, but they become more powerful when combined with objective bias free assessment. Next week, we are exploring the neuroscience of AI delegation how executive brains learn to trust anonymous systems with high stakes decision. Until then, experiment with AI feedback as data, not criticism. Your future leadership effectiveness may depend on it.

Speaker 1:

This is Sahar, your AI whisperer, signing off from AI cafe conversations. Sometimes the most valuable feedback comes from sources that don't care about our feelings. This was the end of this episode. Show me some love like it. Save it, subscribe to my podcast, share it with other people. If you have any questions, you can reach me at sahar, at saharconsultingcom, on my LinkedIn profile, sahar Andrade, or on my Instagram, sahar D Reinvent Coach. Let me know what you think. Leave some comments here until I see you next time, and don't forget, I added a coffee flavor on Fridays. Now that is a podcast based on my Forbes articles. See you then. One, two, three, four.