S2 Episode 7: Alcatraz!

Richie and Erica explore the Trump administration's plan to reopen world-famous Alcatraz Prison. Serious plan, or just major-league trolling by the President? In either case, the announcement is really upsetting local politicians.

THANKS FOR LISTENING

If you'd like to make a sustaining donation in support of this podcast, feel free to make a contribution online: Click here

Transcript

Really, San Francisco? 

Season 2

Episode 7: Alcatraz!

Alcatraz Prison Renovation

Richie and Erica discuss the recent news about potentially turning Alcatraz back into a functioning prison. They note the media's reporting of a $2 billion renovation cost, which Richie questions as potentially inflated. The hosts plan to approach the topic with humor, highlighting the absurdity of the situation. They mention that while some politicians like Scott Weiner are strongly opposed to the idea, moderates seem less concerned, believing it unlikely to happen. Richie, however, suggests that the Trump administration's love for challenges might actually make it possible.

Erica and Richie discuss the feasibility of reopening Alcatraz as a prison. Erica argues it's impractical due to the island's deteriorating condition and high costs, while Richie suggests modern technology could make it viable. They also debate local politicians' responses to the Trump administration's interest in the idea, with Erica interpreting Mayor Daniel Lurie's statement as dismissive of the proposal and focusing on more pressing local issues.

Trump's Alcatraz Proposal Critique

Richie and Erica discuss California State Senator Scott Wiener's response to Trump's idea of reopening Alcatraz. They criticize Wiener's use of the term "fascist" and his characterization of Trump's administration. Richie and Erica agree that Trump's Alcatraz proposal is likely not feasible and may be trolling, rather than a serious plan. They express disapproval of Wiener's rhetoric and mention that he is unpopular, suggesting they should further discuss his controversial bills in the future.

 Erica believes the increased attention could boost tourism to the island, while Richie mentions Nancy Pelosi's statement calling it a diversionary tactic. They debate the economic impact on San Francisco and the costs involved in renovating the facility. Richie raises questions about the jurisdiction and logistics of operating a federal prison on Alcatraz, wondering if the city could interfere with supplying resources to the island.

 Erica strongly opposes the idea, viewing it as an impractical and unnecessary move, given Alcatraz's current role as a tourist attraction and historical landmark. Richie suggests that the proposal is more of a symbolic gesture by the Trump administration to pressure San Francisco on its criminal justice policies. They both agree that the likelihood of the plan coming to fruition is very low, with Richie pointing out several potential obstacles, including the need for congressional approval to modify Alcatraz's historic landmark status.

Richie and Erica discuss the economic impact on San Francisco's tourism against its symbolic value. They consider the island's historical significance, its unique location near the city, and the challenges of renovating or rebuilding the existing structures. Erica shares a poignant anecdote about prisoners' experiences on the island, highlighting its proximity to the city's vibrant life.

Alcatraz Reopening: A Political Distraction

Richie and Erica discuss recent reports about the potential cost of reopening Alcatraz as a prison, ranging from $300 million to $2 billion. They view the proposal as unnecessary and likely a political tactic to provoke reactions from local leaders. The conversation shifts to criticizing San Francisco politicians and highlighting more pressing issues in the city, such as homelessness and drug addiction. They conclude by reflecting on the current state of Union Square and emphasizing the need to focus on real problems facing San Francisco rather than the Alcatraz distraction.