Your world with Dr. Beatrice Hyppolite
Hello,
I am Dr. Marie Beatrice Hyppolite. I hold a doctorate in Health Science with emphasis on Global Health and master’s degree in social work. I have over 14 years of experience in the field of health and human services.
This podcast is primarily focused on mental health and the quality-of-life elements that affect it such as divorce, death, domestic violence, trauma, toxic relationships, and single parenthood to name a few. It is no secret that mental health challenges continue to profoundly impact modern society although not enough discussion is given due to stigma. Research has shown an increase of 25 % in mental health crises after COVID-19. It is important to have honest, uncomfortable conversations about mental health while being supportive. Although we are interdependent, change begins with the individual, hence “your world.”
I welcome you to join me on my journey and look forward to your responses.
Your world with Dr. Beatrice Hyppolite
Guardrails For Speech Online
Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.
A fast post can change a life—sometimes in ways that end in a courtroom. We dig into the real mechanics of defamation on social media, from the moment an unverified claim gets traction to the tests a judge uses to decide whether it crossed the legal line. Along the way, we unpack why certain stories spread, how attention-based monetization tilts creators toward risk, and what practical guardrails keep your voice powerful and safe.
We break down the core elements of defamation in plain language: false statements presented as fact, publication, fault, and damages. Then we draw a bright line between protected opinion and harmful assertions, showing how phrasing, sourcing, and context can flip a post from commentary into liability. You’ll hear why proof of harm goes beyond lost sales to include reputational damage and emotional impact, and how creators can document or mitigate that harm with timely corrections and retractions.
Platforms complicate everything. Automated moderation, mass reporting, and monetization can both amplify and punish the same content. We share straightforward practices to navigate this terrain: verify with multiple sources, disclose uncertainty, separate analysis from claims, and keep notes that demonstrate due diligence. Whether you’re a journalist, a creator, or someone who just wants to post responsibly, you’ll come away with a toolkit for ethical, legally aware communication that builds trust instead of burning it.
If this conversation helps you think differently about what you publish, tap follow, share it with someone who posts a lot, and leave a quick review—what’s the one habit you’ll adopt before you hit post?
Hello everyone, I'm Dr. Beatrice Ipolit and this is your world.
SPEAKER_02:So diagon importance, voilà l'effet besoin preuve. Zou information pour information for justifie. Parce que c'est ABC dans l'information authentifie comme A, B c'est besoin pour preuve, and C A se contextualise l'information. C'est vrai, dommage que mon Johnson Napoleon actor, parce que Johnson Napoleon. Je pense que vous avez des gens qui prennent Johnson Napoleon sur le réseau. Parce que M. comment on fait 1 million de dollars, c'est l'hôpital. Tout le monde recevait des messages. Ce message sur le réseau and information sur le réseau, il faut comprendre ce domaine sur le receptor. Comment les recevoir des messages analyser, vous expliquez que les 1 million sur les Haïtiens. And personnellement, it's apprentice en anglais, you pay, and we pay$350. And if you have deal with l'école plus, you can make it. Mais pas de mort. Au lieu de payer 350$, si vous payez, 250 dollars, vous chargez 200 dollars. C'est une façon de 1 million$. It's confortable, you can expand the bush. I'm going to say it's explicit. It's very normal. Mm-hmm. Florida with nursing school. There are families who are implicit. Don't families. You see, you have several who implies you're going to be here. You see, you see, atonic Florida, there are nurses who are in the family, who are the seuls and dirigent l'école.
SPEAKER_00:You are the réseaux sociaux. Commentel? Oui. So you see that Paola is telling you that we have tomb in a situation côté situation to conduit la justice.
SPEAKER_01:Effectivement en ligne, on apparaît devant un juge Florida. Par rapport à une dame, je ne sais pas, je ne sais pas, verify, veracity, etc. So I estimate that personality attacked who has sorted. They returned. The fact that Attorney General is in the zone, they have don't have to have it. Okay. I think there are sorry at the problem. But it's very present. After timid device, they have a personality. Okay? But they are sorry, it's a dame who has to say they are because they have a breeding. Something like that. You have to exist, and they say that it's a memory etc. No, no, no, no.
SPEAKER_02:Monsieur Sayo, I'm going to have you attack your hands who can venture to Mr. Sayo, we can just pay you to go. It's like, you did, you have to do that. You're going to verify, but we have to go to Mr. Sayo because it's an influence, you have to, you have to support you. If you have the problem with your person, you can have a solution.
SPEAKER_01:So you can see the march and you can't do it. Because there are sure, there are participants, you have to sortify that. Because therefore, you have an album, you obligate to participate in the album because you have a buzz into the body. A niveau commercial, you have a rules because you plotten.
SPEAKER_00:I'm content to ajout that. Secondly, if you have positive, you have to go to social media, you utilise the platform to a lot of grand, to aide to avancing, and you have a series of bags, for that and we can buy the crédit.
SPEAKER_01:No, that's sort of sauf that we have a sujet and we demand diffamation. But est-ce que social media aspect possible? Certainly. Au niveau education, they dépend de qui. Daphne, la Chine a app who are carried on block parce qu'ils estiment qu'ils apportent a niveau educatif for us. They create you and social media who are carrying. Because you have social, you have following, you have to attend you, there are line, and when you have coin a niveau of TikTok, Google Coin, we have$10,$20,000.
SPEAKER_00:We have to receive$20 million. And you 10 million and$200.
SPEAKER_02:No, but Carol, for example, who is an influence of the resources, you did an emission that you have with Valerio and Saint-Louis sur TV. You judge the resources, Valerio posed the question how many people are. Shakespeare we have around 12 000. Because there are an emission, and they have 12 000 dollars. But you have the three, and you know, there are a million dollars. There are Biden who is there, and your lifestyle, you're still gonna be able to get it. Don't voil it. It's dangerous. But if you have the resources, there are socials you have plus garbage that you have and the boss you prefer.
SPEAKER_00:Also, you are in the sujet that is diffamation, and some people have a position to make an avocate, and you have to say if you have to do it because when you are business for you, and if you have a chance to represent the market, it's appropriate.
SPEAKER_01:No, if you have an approach in many didactic. Est-ce que des gens qui travaillent pour audience and you know what audience has besoined? That's it. Is it garbage publics? But necessarily diffamation, no. Exactly. Parce que diffamation for intention that is not informed. That's false information. So there's an objective that's clearly defined. And we have an example of DJ with dame who finds paraports to music. Parce que l'intention is to move Didier in a situation difficult. You have to feel just créaring it. Parce que Monsieur, I'm attacking it. Exactly. And you're capable of interaction and diffamation content pour le direct parce que you know pertinent false statement. So you're bad. And là encore, nous obligerons de prendre un aspect where the clientele. We have an emission educatively. Dr. Joseph educatives necessarily who are bêtises, etc. 2 million views. Dr. Joseph, scientific, battle to publicize an article.
SPEAKER_02:Malheureusement, comme les réseaux sociaux, nous focus sur la diffamation. Mais des choses créées, nous avons mauvais, mais ce qui utilise problematic. La Chine, par exemple, who blocées because it is Chinois, you're utile. Ou café, vous parlez presque tout sur les réseaux sociaux. Ouais, c'est la plage. Même dans la plage, vous parlez avec ton place. For this, it's not because they're not, but Madame, or this, to attack attention, they will have to do it. Mm-hmm. That exists for personal. Mm-hmm. It's not important.
SPEAKER_00:Because I'm reprints that I'm saying, I don't appreciate the gentleman, and we have to dance, and you have to go to the house. Jeff, you can't say, it's a grandmother who has 5-6 ans. They are not.
SPEAKER_01:There are different social media, there are certain policies that are in place. Mm-hmm. AI will automatically retirate or flag on channel that you publicize. There are chances to block the channel. So many people who have TikTok in particular who have grandmothers who have chances that you flagged the channel. So that's the procedure. So you have a procedure, we have a grandmother who have someone. But we arrived with connaissance, tromping, so we have two people who have. That's the case. We have a store, we have, etc. We have to report in the resources. Because there are people who have reported the reporter page. The fact that you reported by joy, TikTok that does have a mesure to block, there are people who reported. We reported for different reasons. And we do a store, we say we want to TikTok. There's a problem. So we report the marchandises that you want to do. We have a cup of cristal or plastic. The fact that the page reports and there are the possibilities that you block. In principle, what we are supposed to do is if you have to correspond to how the policies have en place. You have norms that you are supposed to support. And you can contour, we're going to pay for the sujet.
SPEAKER_00:Okay, in the Dr. Joseph, what is display for causing diffam to the resources?
SPEAKER_01:Well, you have the point that we have the reality. He has a problem. We are capable of continuing the avocado. Because for him, he has to make that. It's a false statement. We have intention to do that. It's just some information that we have an analysis in function of it. We think it's a reality. And now we're doing our point. We have a statement of fact. Ah, we're here, Madame Tell, or Mr. No. After the Assembly, the qualified, which is a good idea.
SPEAKER_02:We can assume it's an opinion that you have to make.
SPEAKER_01:It's extremely important to opinion. It's an analysis that you have in the situation. So there are different factors. The three is that we're going to say that we have victims, it's public. It's a code. It's just that there are people. So if you have a publication that is information, automatically we can say that you have victims. And we can prove that there are damage. It's a damage.
SPEAKER_02:It's obligatory material or something. Because if we have a reputation, we're saying damage.
SPEAKER_01:It's emotional. Because we can prove to matter what emotional victims of that. It's difficult. Because we have psychological, people who prove effectively, for example, what are you saying to this? We think to tangent that can exist. We don't know it's emotional that it's affected. It's very emotional. But because of that, we are encouraging to work. Automatically, the financier will affect it. It's very that we come in emotional, but we can join the tangent to what it implies.
SPEAKER_00:Or in a situation that can rent your phase depressive access. But when the depression is in a situation who has to be able to do it, they can retiren socially. Mais là, dans une étude qui est faite en 2018, you disagree 70% dans le jugement sur la diffamation impliquée sur les social media. Vous pensez que vous avez une verità. Comme you say, c'est pas une étude, c'est pas de la vie.
SPEAKER_01:On journalistes, you have ethics that you have suived. Et s'il affecte une institution, il ne peut pas dire licence libre, il ne peut pas perdre. clientele, etc. Because the social media, we party of influencers, we party of those who have accessibility and it's normal plus social media implications than the media traditional. Because automatically if we publicize an article in journal, we have an article in the world. And if you have a chance to publicize it, and if you have a rapport, it is insertion demand totally. Yeah. You have some réponse, etc.
SPEAKER_00:The institutions who respect to pretty mesure possible for each implicit dans l'intéressant pendant aux Etats-Unis, Haiti, qui comprend les gens dans les sociétés, mais il est intéressant pour les études côté Australie, c'est pourcentage dans la déformation sur les sociétés qui ont doublé la quantité de la parce que la liberté de la parole nous empiété sur ce que nous gagne sur la loi.
SPEAKER_02:La loi de la parole, par exemple, le premier amendement sur la liberté de la parole. Parfois, l'on a liberté de la parole, nous utilisons plus que ce café ou overuse. Nous avons dit, nous avons des influenceurs austriens, nous avons d'influenceurs australiens, cependant, vous avez des lois qui régissent l'utilisation des sociétés. Cela veut dire que c'est facile pour si les gens font des diffamations ou des informations qui ne sont pas pour la justice. Et la justice sanctionne de justifier les informations comme la vraie justice. Donc c'est deux marches, côté liberté, liberté commencer, même les gens qui ont des informations de liberté pour protéger la tête. Et la justice est le même espace légal qui peut trancher dans deux. Et l'Australie c'est un continent, pays qui prend ça très sérieux et information sur les gens. Et c'est ce que ce n'est pas étonné que le pourcentage de diffamation devant la justice, c'est parce que la justice est très focus sur ça. Vous ne pouvez pas faire des informations sur les gens que intentionnellement la réputation.
SPEAKER_01:Compléter ça, Dr. Joseph Dia, avec information, ancien premier ministre, vous faites des informations sur lui. Alors, implementer des lois to assure that. It's difficult to assure this. But there's a lois diminution to manage positive. We have a chapter of Valerie Numan.
SPEAKER_02:They say the videos who are positive and long videos and n'importei mais Valerie Duma, je dis la kommunication en pile et d'ailleurs étudie et journalisme dans l'école Valérie Duma et toujours de très bonne relation qui a plusieurs décennies. En général, si vous avez Valérie, vous avez positif negative pour moi, comme Vision 2000, pas même Vision 2000, longtemps avec Monsieur Vision, Monsieur Bas. Non, on fait positif. Et vous avez dit, il y a une positivité dans le camp de la vie avec Jean-Laprenville. Je pense que c'est bien. Nous avons une plateforme sur les réseaux sociaux, vous avez trop positifs. Il y a des gens qui font des choses positifs. Par exemple, les réseaux sociaux, si vous avez sur YouTube, vous cherchez sur YouTube. Il y a des gens qui mangerent manger sur les réseaux sociaux. Comment vous andi, mais comment it's possible. You have problems. You can appare assembly. There are two positives and you have to do it. But there's respect to people than people who are intentional to destroy the social. There are problems.
SPEAKER_01:I think recently an approach that I feel who are in IT and the views that are at the point where YouTube, Mr. Channel who's going to be arrived. Parallel, what the clientele auditors are intéressed, or educatif, extrêmement, but nous avons chance pour nous faire des choses, mais nous ne sommes pas des challenges extrêmement difficiles forces and résoudre la base de problem.
SPEAKER_00:Mais it's important and tapbling avocados, professionnel. Dr Joseph, en plus comme si je embrasse les social media pour nous faire des activités personnelles, nous remetons des professionnels qui ont des assets importants pour une société que nous vivons là-dedans. D'abord, nous avons une image que nous présentons pour nous.
SPEAKER_01:Comme professionnels, nous présentons and si nous avons des choses pour nous offrir la communauté, si nous avons positivity, nous engagons notamment aspect par rapport, but the most attack and we have the sujet we have emissions, we talked about social media, we have positive negativity, etc. Because if we have done it, it's done and we have to talk about two years on social media. We have live we have live we have to do the context but we can get to what we interest is capacity in professionals to the police who are going to get them interesting. Let's say it's after the verity because he is entertained but it's a big example.
SPEAKER_02:You know, you have to say influence I'm going to say some journalists the journalists are an influence and the journalists directly but haïtiens qui ont d'informations qui dénonce en Haïti qui ont des informations sur les bandits et les amis nous avons fait sixième ensemble en Haïti et je parle avec tout et je suis en réunion d'habitude je ne parle pas souvent mais je suis en réunion je suis réunion je parle de M. Jean Monsieur Florent c'est un tel information sur le bon repos qui est track même que M. Prends patata même ensemble Florent si M. Mais parfois les informations aux Etats Unis who are en Haitian en Haiti justement in the sense whoin avec nous qui nous règlement avec exemple information immediately information but for it. Because if there are reputation but the information because they are both information because it's responsible if you have information there's information and two utilisons est un deuxième ou troisième source pour verifier si vous avez information geniale correcte and prove c'est une retraction it's very important and critic and we basically ethical information we are dansaly and respecter ethics scientific three fondamental responsibility esprit and ethics this is fondamental n'importe pour mettre retraction we have result and those reproductive reproductive and recherche I can say no information we can do okay I will experience in 2023 I'm going to saut in the Merciless Separation and late version française with Espagn I travail surplus accurate normal français anglais I effaced if you have two information français but so we corrige professional for exercises that we have very bad exercises to create if you have this pages and we have to capture it important to recognize it difficult to society.
SPEAKER_01:But there are publications movies for example lives as soon as you eviter the person fictifying true story basic story fictify and photo for authorization to retiring the problem because there are problems there are prevention prevention in the reality assure that is very important.
SPEAKER_02:This is what we're normal to attack on other people who are menacing with victims and I will pay for cause and we can Dr Joseph Daniel for Amen if we have der opinion sur diffamation society parce que Daniel écoute les réseaux sociaux sont extrêmement importants que vous utilisez les seuls c'est comment utiliser les réseaux sociaux ce ne sont pas les réseaux sociaux en soi qui sont bons mais ce sont des réseaux sociaux pour les gens qui ont des téléphones qui publient n'importe qui la seule question fondamentale que je vous pose si les informations pour détruire les moi qui pour détruire vous pertinemment les informations ou des informations ou attaquer la réputation si c'est moi qui ai attaqué la réputation que vous faites comment vous recevez poser des questions et puis je pense que c'est ça poser les questions plusieurs avant de publier les informations de la réputation.
SPEAKER_01:C'est extrêmement important pour chaque personne qui met en position to partage des informations ou pour influencer l'autre personne toute action. Est-ce que vous influence de manière positive or influencer de manière negative information c'est parce que vous informez pour eviter ou contrôler un problème or just informer so influencer parce que decision or agreement it's extrêmement fail de manière responsable facile to utilise accessible but responsibility if there are factors that we are capable of exercises that we have responsability with decisions that we prend to même influence journalist ou social media but conséquences are also dramatic and analysis what are conséquences
SPEAKER_00:You know, who are playing with grandmother who are racing comments encouraging parallel and veracité de l'autre personnel, they dépliez. Les gens comme si vous avez un moment pour déplorer et que il n'y a pas de necessité pour déplumer, ce qui fait pour ramasser les plies et pour mettre sur l'immigration pour ne pas arriver à la collecter. Et que alors c'est pour d'accord avec l'opinion de Dr. Joseph, ni l'opinion Daniel. Nous avons des informations. Les réseaux sociaux sont des importants. Et tous les deux et les experts dépendent de quelle fain nous choisissons d'utiliser. C'est important que nous utilisons les gens. Parce que nous, nous parler.
SPEAKER_01:Exactly.
SPEAKER_00:Je vais prendre tes moments pour vous remercier Dr. Joseph. Dr. Joseph, je ne vous aime pas. Je ne sais pas ce n'est pas facile pour vous. Mais je ne fais pas de couteau en examination. Je ne vais pas faire ça. Je vous réponds, Dr. Joseph, nous avons fait un homme. Je vous dis, je cherche pour moi ce qui est bon. C'était vraiment un plaisir pour nous faire ensemble avec Daniel. Sans hésiter, je te dis. Je vous prends merci pour vous, merci pour la dedication, et merci pour tous les gens qui supportaient avec Dr. Beatrice Hippolyte.
SPEAKER_02:D'abord, je vous remercie Dr. Hippolyte parce que c'est avec un peu de humilité que je vous invite à l'émission. Je vous dis oui, je participe. D'ailleurs, qui suis-je pour decliner une invitation ou l'opportunité de partager une même plateforme avec Daniel? Qui suis-je pour dire non à une invitation? Donc, je ne peux pas dire non parce que l'information nous fait eduquer and comprendre, même si c'est une green person, même si Jean Bonjour pour destruction, Sudan and Goum, même si it's the seul person who are loyal or seul person qui beneficient de sandia, it is Daniel.
SPEAKER_00:Non seulement. Je dis merci.
SPEAKER_02:C'est suffisant.
SPEAKER_00:Non seulement, toujours disponible, mais vous avez encore voyage de l'autre et à l'autre et que je pense que tout ça est impeyable. Je vous dis que je vous encourage ou bien indiquer.
SPEAKER_01:J'aime finir pour tous les gens qui ont une opportunité pour les messages. De manière responsable, it's pleasure to participate for you. Responsability and facility. It's a good thing.
SPEAKER_00:Okay, so pretty for you guys, merciful encouragement pour nous abonner, partage and opinion. Encore une fois, c'est avec nous dans le show préféré avec Dr. Preféré, Beatrice Hippolyte. Ciao!