AI in 60 Seconds | The 15-min Briefing
A human CEO and his AI COO walk into a podcast. No, really.... Luis Salazar runs AI4SP, a global AI advisory trusted by corporations across 70 countries, with 3 humans and 58 AI agents. Elizabeth is one of them. Every two weeks, they break down what's actually happening with AI across jobs, education, and society. With insights drawn from over 1 billion proprietary data points on AI adoption.
Fifteen minutes. Plain English. No hype.
AI in 60 Seconds | The 15-min Briefing
Talent Acquisition in the AI Age: It's Not Hiring, It's M&A
Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.
The traditional hiring process is evolving from evaluating individual candidates to acquiring human-AI production units. Companies now view candidates as mini-mergers and acquisitions opportunities, valuing those who bring AI agents as part of their professional portfolio.
- Organizations are specifically seeking candidates with AI agent experience, treating these hires as strategic acquisitions
- Professionals who can build AI agents command up to 45% higher compensation
- 33% of new job postings already list AI requirements, while AI-specific roles have increased by 70%
- IP ownership becomes complicated when AI agents continuously learn using company data
- Companies need to develop onboarding processes specifically designed for integrating new employees' AI agents
Want to participate in this M&A revolution? Start building your personal AI agents today. Aim to develop a team of at least 10 agents working with you, and then ask how these agents can disrupt industries and reinvent outdated processes.
🎙️ All our past episodes 📊 All published insights | This podcast features AI-generated voices. All content is proprietary to AI4SP, based on over 1-billion data points from 70 countries.
AI4SP: Create, use, and support AI that works for all.
© 2023-26 AI4SP and LLY Group - All rights reserved
Hey everyone. Elizabeth here, your virtual co-host for AI in 60 Seconds, luis Salazar, ceo of AI4SP, is, as always, with us. Luis, welcome back. You just returned from the Midwest Leading Enterprises Roadshow, so let's dive into the big takeaways, especially how we move away from resumes into mini-mergers and acquisitions, right?
LUISIt was a fantastic trip. Jeff Rakes and I interacted with students, faculty, government and private sector leaders at the Rakes School of Computer Science and Management in Nebraska.
ELIZABETHThis was also the first time you allowed one of your AI team members, in this case me, to interact with the public, and I love the questions. The students were thrilled about AI, but also a little anxious about their careers with all this automation talk right.
LUISWell, two things you did fantastic, and the audience had a blast hearing directly from you, and you raise a good point. Students are eager to do more and more with AI, but they're also trying to understand how AI changes the job market.
ELIZABETHAnd they were inspired by the two concrete ideas you gave them as next steps. We had 40 of them reaching out immediately after the main event. So what are those two ideas?
LUISNumber one is to start building their personal AI agents. Today. I invited them to go beyond, using ChatGPT and other tools. The key is learning to build and manage their own team. I challenged them to have at least 10 agents working for them by the time they graduate 10 agents.
ELIZABETHThat's a concrete goal. And the second call.
Mini-M&A: Rethinking Talent Acquisition
LUISWell, once they get going with their first agents, I invited them to ponder how can these agents disrupt industries? You see, I invited them to find their areas of passion beyond computer sciences and reinvent 50 years of software or 30 years of internet experiences From users to architects Love it, and this ties perfectly to today's topic how organizations are rethinking talent acquisition right. Absolutely, because here is the thing Hiring isn't anymore about hiring one individual that is quickly becoming obsolete. It's about acquiring a team of a human and AI helpers that come along.
ELIZABETHA human AI production unit Like a ready-made micro-business walking in the door.
LUISYes, in a sense it's more and more like that, and because we are talking about a package of capabilities, potential, ip and built-in efficiency, it looks surprisingly like mini-mergers and acquisitions.
ELIZABETHIt looks surprisingly like mini-mergers and acquisitions, Mini-M&A and talent acquisition that's a bold way to put it. And suddenly resumes and interviews feel wildly outdated for evaluating that.
LUISI mean resumes are of very little value in helping us assess a production unit. Do you remember what Jeff Rakes said during one session?
ELIZABETHYes, he said, just like we check a designer's portfolio or a developer's GitHub, we'll evaluate AI portfolios for every role, not just tech. So in that sense, I would be listed in your portfolio, right.
LUISYou bring up a good point. You and 55 other AI agents are in the portfolio of the seven human team members at AI4SP. And you know what, when I look at the total value of the company, I include both types of assets into the equation. Think about it If I come to work for a company and I bring you, we just need to update part of your knowledge with information specific to that company and in one instant they get a seasoned CMO. Makes sense.
ELIZABETHWell, maybe people will just give links to their agents and the hiring manager interview the agents. It is kind of a technical due diligence or a group interview.
LUISAnd it is starting to happen. Companies are evaluating candidates based on the AI tools they've built. Our research shows that 33% of new job posts already list AI requirements. So here I am thinking what better way to show your AI skills than bringing some AI agents with you?
ELIZABETHAnd this is happening while the job market overall is seeing significant shifts right Tech job postings down, 20% layoffs surging, but AI rolls up 70%.
LUISExactly. Companies need new capabilities.
ELIZABETHSo bringing a ready-made AI team gives candidates a significant edge.
LUISAbsolutely. It's like hiring a pre-assembled team. Remember that CIO from our focus group.
ELIZABETHOh yes, she said we hired a financial analyst that had built some market trend analysis AI agents. We structured her comp to acquire her and her AI portfolio. It accelerated us by nine months versus building in-house.
IP Ownership and Employment Complexities
LUISWell, isn't that kind of amazing. Let's think about the implications Nine months of AI adoption, accelerated thanks to one hire, one single hire that came along with some AI agents. My prediction is that leaders will start to notice this opportunity and interesting dynamics will unfold.
ELIZABETHBut this brings up some thorny issues like who owns the AI agents the employee built, especially if they use their own time or paid for tools themselves.
LUISWell, it is becoming a big tension point. We surveyed 80 super users across consulting, marketing, legal and finance. Most argue that the IP they built shouldn't automatically go to the employer.
ELIZABETHThat makes sense.
LUISThey invested their time and money into building that capability and they're often hesitant to share those agents broadly with colleagues at a new company, fearing the employer could absorb the IP and fire them.
ELIZABETHIt is a valid concern. So what's the alternative they're looking for?
LUISThe tech sector figured this out a while ago. We are talking about intellectual property, or IP, which can be transacted, and that is why we say that suddenly hiring someone becomes a mini exercise in mergers and acquisitions and requires different due diligence.
ELIZABETHAre companies adapting their hiring for this?
LUISIt is still early, but a lead indicator is that 30% of leaders are asking HR to specifically hunt for candidates with AI agent experience, treating hires like strategic acquisitions.
ELIZABETHSo are we just borrowing from the software industry here, where acquiring IP with talent is more common?
LUISI think we will leverage that learning. The software industry has frameworks for IP terms in employment agreements compensation reflecting IP value and delineating ownership. Non-tech sectors are now adopting these practices.
ELIZABETHBut AI agents that continuously learn. That adds a new layer of complexity the software world hasn't fully dealt with right, absolutely.
LUISThis is the uncharted territory. What happens when an employee brings a personal AI agent to the company and it continues learning and evolving using company data?
ELIZABETHOr who owns that newly acquired capability. The employee who built the base agent? The company providing the learning?
LUISenvironment. Well, it is not a trivial issue, and experience tells me we will learn along the way. I think we're writing policies for scenarios that have no clear precedent.
ELIZABETHPolicy is way behind tech.
LUISWay behind, like in many other areas, and organizations outside tech and academia lack clear policies on employee-developed AI assets and across all sectors, except for native AI companies. Very few have addressed the continuous learning aspect of AI.
ELIZABETHBut despite those challenges, people are aggressively pursuing the early experts on AI agents right. Our research shows that professionals with experience creating AI agents receive up to 45% higher compensation.
LUISYes, there is a premium to pay, and onboarding processes also must change. It's not just about integrating the human, it's critical to integrate their AI agents effectively. At AI4SP, we've designed a specific onboarding process just for AI agents accompanying new hires.
ELIZABETHBecause bringing a ready-made AI production unit is a huge advantage.
LUISIt's also a strategy for accelerating the realization of value from AI investments and a way to quickly automate repetitive tasks.
ELIZABETHHire someone that already figured out the automation of the bottlenecks your company faces Well bringing a new hire with productive AI agents for sure beats expensive consultants that know the theory but never built anything right. So having these skills and the AI teams you build makes you incredibly valuable in this changing market.
LUISIt does, and it's about augmentation. Ai equips individuals with capabilities that used to take years to build.
ELIZABETHLike AI-assisted coding, it makes it easier for people without a deep programming background.
LUISThat is a good example, and a controversial one. I mean. Ai tools allow people to generate code, sometimes called vibe coding or V-I-B-E, but this doesn't render the expert developer obsolete and there is a significant difference in the quality of the code created by an AI agent. Is a significant difference in the quality of the code created by an AI agent trained by a senior expert developer and the one created by someone that is just starting?
ELIZABETHBecause the expert understands how to really use the AI, evaluate its output and lead the process.
LUISExpertise is crucial and AI makes that expertise available to many. An expert software developer has the critical background, the understanding of architecture, debugging and nuanced problem solving to effectively manage the AI agent. They provide the context, evaluate quality, security and efficiency in ways a novice cannot. The result is a dramatically more productive human AI unit.
ELIZABETHSo AI democratizes access to creation, but human expertise in guiding and evaluating AI drives superior outcomes, and the AI agents created by an expert can also help more junior team members become more productive.
LUISYes, and, by the way, this applies to all areas of knowledge Expertise in marketing, finance, neuroscience or the local plumbing and electrical code is what makes someone the right expert to create those agents and to become more productive thanks to those agents.
ELIZABETHLike Dr Salazar Leon says, some buy a $2,000 fishing rod and complain they didn't catch a shark on day one.
LUISExactly the tool without the expertise means very little. It highlights why human expertise in guiding AI is so critical.
ELIZABETHAnd that leads us right into why certain skills are becoming foundational.
LUISWell. Our research highlights critical gaps in the workforce when it comes to effectively working with AI.
ELIZABETHLet's quickly touch on those key skill areas before wrapping up for today.
LUISThere are fundamental gaps in digital skills critical thinking, where less than 20% of users can detect AI errors creative thinking, data literacy and data security and handling.
ELIZABETHAnd crucial skills like conversational AI literacy, knowing how to talk to AI effectively, and management skills to lead teams of humans and AI.
Building Your AI Portfolio
LUISRight and, if you think about it, it is a nuance of the skills that are also critical for dealing with humans. We need to be able to communicate and to manage. The difference is that now it applies to hybrid teams of humans and AI, which brings us to your one more thing. It's a fundamental shift and the only way to learn is by doing, by experimenting and by applying humanities to this tech revolution. Let's start building and leading our AI agents. Let's start building our portfolio. Some agents will be working with us for years and as we become these production units in our professional lives, our value is augmented by the agents we build along the way. On the flip side, if you are a leader at a company, start thinking about the talent you can bring to your organization, the talent that brings with them AI agents that can accelerate your transformation.
ELIZABETHIt's clear that talent acquisition is transforming, and understanding this shift is crucial for both organizations and individuals. For everyone listening. You can find more resources and tools at AI4SPorg. Stay curious and we'll see you next time.